Sharad Ghamande, MD, FACOG
Professor and Director of Gynecologic Oncology
Augusta University Cancer Center
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
www.gacommissiononwomen.org
Nicole S. Carlson, PhD, CNM
President, Georgia Affiliate of American College of Nurse-Midwives
Assistant Professor, Emory University School of Nursing
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
November 9, 2015
Nancy M. Paris, President and CEO
Angie Patterson, Vice President
Georgia CORE Center for Oncology Research and Education
Presentation to Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
www.gacommissiononwomen.org
Dr. Brenda Fitzgerald, Commissioner and State Health Officer, Georgia Department of Public Health
Presentation to the Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
www.gacommissiononwomen.org
Pat Cota, Executive Director
Georgia Obstetrics and Gynecology Society
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
November 9, 2015
Adrienne D. Zertuche, MD, MPH
Georgia Maternal and Infant Health Research Group
Georgia Obstetrical and Gynecological Society
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
www.gacommissiononwomen.org
Lucy Marion, PhD, RN
Dean, College of Nursing
Augusta University
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
www.gacommissiononwomen.org
Nicole S. Carlson, PhD, CNM
President, Georgia Affiliate of American College of Nurse-Midwives
Assistant Professor, Emory University School of Nursing
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
November 9, 2015
Nancy M. Paris, President and CEO
Angie Patterson, Vice President
Georgia CORE Center for Oncology Research and Education
Presentation to Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
www.gacommissiononwomen.org
Dr. Brenda Fitzgerald, Commissioner and State Health Officer, Georgia Department of Public Health
Presentation to the Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
www.gacommissiononwomen.org
Pat Cota, Executive Director
Georgia Obstetrics and Gynecology Society
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
November 9, 2015
Adrienne D. Zertuche, MD, MPH
Georgia Maternal and Infant Health Research Group
Georgia Obstetrical and Gynecological Society
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
www.gacommissiononwomen.org
Lucy Marion, PhD, RN
Dean, College of Nursing
Augusta University
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
www.gacommissiononwomen.org
James R. Zaidan, MD, MBA
Associate Dean, Graduate Medical Education
Emory University School of Medicine
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
November 9, 2015
Lucy Marion, PhD, RN, FAAN, FAANP
Dean, College of Nursing, Augusta University
Chair, APRN Task Force of Georgia Nursing Leadership Coalition
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
Paul C. Browne, MD
Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Medical College of Georgia
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
www.gacommissiononwomen.org
D. Stephen Goggans, MD, MPH
District Health Director - East Central District
Georgia Department of Public Health
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
www.gacommissiononwomen.org
Well Care Health Plans, Inc.
Presentation to Georgia House Children's Mental Health Study Committee
October 20, 2015
Dauda Griffin, MD
Behavioral Health Medical Director
Remedios Roderiguez, Senior Director
Behavioral Health Operations
MaryJane Lewitt, PhD, APRN, CNM, FACNM
Nurse-Midwifery Program Director
Emory University Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
November 9, 2015
Seema Csukas, MD, PhD
Medical Director, Maternal and Child Health
Georgia Department of Public Health
Presentation to Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
November 9, 2015
Global Partnership for Telehealth
Shea Ross
Georgia House Study Committee on Health, Education, and School-Based Healthcare
www.gacommissiononwomen.org
Amerigroup Georgia
Presentation to the Georgia House Children's Mental Health Study Committee
October 20, 2015
Earlie Rockette, Regional Vice President
Special Programs
GA House Study Committee on Health, Education, and School-Based Health Centers
Dr. Veda Johnson , Director of Partners for Equity in Child & Adolescent Health, Emory Univ School of Medicine
www.gacommissiononwomen.org
This is the abstract presentation by Maria Persson, which took place as part of 8th session of 10th Asia Pacific Conference on Reproductive and Sexual Health and Rights (APCRSHR10) Virtual, on 28th September 2020, on the theme of "Safe abortion and sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in Asia and the Pacific". 28 September is also observed as International Safe Abortion Day.
C H A I R
Amy Williamson, Country Director, Marie Stopes International, Cambodia
P L E N A R Y S P E A K E R S
* Dr Suchitra Dalvie, coordinator, Asia Safe Abortion Partnership (ASAP) | "Abortion and Reproductive Justice: The Unfinished Revolution"
* Sivananthi Thanenthiran, Executive Director, ARROW | "Right to Safe Abortion: putting women at the centre of the discourse and practice"
A B S T R A C T P R E S E N T E R S
* Katherine Gambir | Is Self-Administered Medical Abortion as Effective as Provider-Administered Medical Abortion? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
* Aryanty Riznawaty Imma | Challenges in Recording Abortion Related Complications at Health Facilities in Setting Where Abortion is Highly Restricted
* Dr Yaghoob Foroutan | Abortion’s Patterns and Determinants in Iran: Attitudinal Dynamics
* Maria Persson | A Qualitative Study on Healthcare Providers’ Experiences of Providing Comprehensive Abortion Care in the Humanitarian Setting in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh
For more information on this session go to www.bit.ly/apcrshr10virtual8
#SRHR #sexualhealth #reproductiverights #familyplanning #womenshealth #genderequality #SDGs #abortion #MyAbortionMyHealth #28Sept #InternationalSafeAbortionDay #SafeAbortion #BodilyAutonomy
Georgia Department of Community Health
Presentation to the Georgia House Children's Mental Health Study Committee
October 20, 2015
Marcey Alter, Assistant Chief
Medicaid
About this webinar:
Breast radiologist Dr. Paula Gordon will discuss the optimal strategy for achieving early detection of breast cancer. She will also describe the flawed process used in making Canadian breast screening guidelines, impacting millions of women. Patient advocate Jennie Dale from Dense Breasts Canada will look at the inequities in breast cancer screening and surveillance practices in Canada. She will also explore ways to advocate for better screening and surveillance.
About the presenters:
Dr. Paula Gordon is a Clinical Professor in the Department of Radiology at the University of British Columbia, and has been practicing for over 35 years. She is Founding Medical Director of the Sadie Diamond Breast Program at BC Women’s Hospital, and a founding member of the Canadian Society of Breast Imaging. She’s given hundreds of lectures at meetings around the globe. She received a Queen Elizabeth Diamond Jubilee Medal, and was invested in the Order of British Columbia. She was named one of Canada’s 100 Most Powerful Women by the Women’s Executive Network.
Jennie Dale is the Co-founder and Executive Director of Dense Breasts Canada (DBC). She was diagnosed with breast cancer in October 2014. Inspired by the successful advocacy and education efforts of similar American organizations, Jennie co-founded DBC with Michelle Di Tomaso in 2016. They teamed up with breast cancer survivors, dedicated individuals, and health care professionals nationwide to raise awareness of the risks of dense breasts and advocate for patient notification of breast density and access to supplemental screening. She is fighting for necessary revisions to the current Canadian Task Force breast cancer screening guidelines, which put women's lives at risk. In 2021, Jennie was named a top 5 finalist in Charity Village's awards in the category of Most Outstanding Impact by a Volunteer.
James R. Zaidan, MD, MBA
Associate Dean, Graduate Medical Education
Emory University School of Medicine
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
November 9, 2015
Lucy Marion, PhD, RN, FAAN, FAANP
Dean, College of Nursing, Augusta University
Chair, APRN Task Force of Georgia Nursing Leadership Coalition
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
Paul C. Browne, MD
Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Medical College of Georgia
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
www.gacommissiononwomen.org
D. Stephen Goggans, MD, MPH
District Health Director - East Central District
Georgia Department of Public Health
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
www.gacommissiononwomen.org
Well Care Health Plans, Inc.
Presentation to Georgia House Children's Mental Health Study Committee
October 20, 2015
Dauda Griffin, MD
Behavioral Health Medical Director
Remedios Roderiguez, Senior Director
Behavioral Health Operations
MaryJane Lewitt, PhD, APRN, CNM, FACNM
Nurse-Midwifery Program Director
Emory University Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing
Presentation to the Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
November 9, 2015
Seema Csukas, MD, PhD
Medical Director, Maternal and Child Health
Georgia Department of Public Health
Presentation to Georgia Senate Women's Adequate Healthcare Study Committee
November 9, 2015
Global Partnership for Telehealth
Shea Ross
Georgia House Study Committee on Health, Education, and School-Based Healthcare
www.gacommissiononwomen.org
Amerigroup Georgia
Presentation to the Georgia House Children's Mental Health Study Committee
October 20, 2015
Earlie Rockette, Regional Vice President
Special Programs
GA House Study Committee on Health, Education, and School-Based Health Centers
Dr. Veda Johnson , Director of Partners for Equity in Child & Adolescent Health, Emory Univ School of Medicine
www.gacommissiononwomen.org
This is the abstract presentation by Maria Persson, which took place as part of 8th session of 10th Asia Pacific Conference on Reproductive and Sexual Health and Rights (APCRSHR10) Virtual, on 28th September 2020, on the theme of "Safe abortion and sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in Asia and the Pacific". 28 September is also observed as International Safe Abortion Day.
C H A I R
Amy Williamson, Country Director, Marie Stopes International, Cambodia
P L E N A R Y S P E A K E R S
* Dr Suchitra Dalvie, coordinator, Asia Safe Abortion Partnership (ASAP) | "Abortion and Reproductive Justice: The Unfinished Revolution"
* Sivananthi Thanenthiran, Executive Director, ARROW | "Right to Safe Abortion: putting women at the centre of the discourse and practice"
A B S T R A C T P R E S E N T E R S
* Katherine Gambir | Is Self-Administered Medical Abortion as Effective as Provider-Administered Medical Abortion? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
* Aryanty Riznawaty Imma | Challenges in Recording Abortion Related Complications at Health Facilities in Setting Where Abortion is Highly Restricted
* Dr Yaghoob Foroutan | Abortion’s Patterns and Determinants in Iran: Attitudinal Dynamics
* Maria Persson | A Qualitative Study on Healthcare Providers’ Experiences of Providing Comprehensive Abortion Care in the Humanitarian Setting in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh
For more information on this session go to www.bit.ly/apcrshr10virtual8
#SRHR #sexualhealth #reproductiverights #familyplanning #womenshealth #genderequality #SDGs #abortion #MyAbortionMyHealth #28Sept #InternationalSafeAbortionDay #SafeAbortion #BodilyAutonomy
Georgia Department of Community Health
Presentation to the Georgia House Children's Mental Health Study Committee
October 20, 2015
Marcey Alter, Assistant Chief
Medicaid
About this webinar:
Breast radiologist Dr. Paula Gordon will discuss the optimal strategy for achieving early detection of breast cancer. She will also describe the flawed process used in making Canadian breast screening guidelines, impacting millions of women. Patient advocate Jennie Dale from Dense Breasts Canada will look at the inequities in breast cancer screening and surveillance practices in Canada. She will also explore ways to advocate for better screening and surveillance.
About the presenters:
Dr. Paula Gordon is a Clinical Professor in the Department of Radiology at the University of British Columbia, and has been practicing for over 35 years. She is Founding Medical Director of the Sadie Diamond Breast Program at BC Women’s Hospital, and a founding member of the Canadian Society of Breast Imaging. She’s given hundreds of lectures at meetings around the globe. She received a Queen Elizabeth Diamond Jubilee Medal, and was invested in the Order of British Columbia. She was named one of Canada’s 100 Most Powerful Women by the Women’s Executive Network.
Jennie Dale is the Co-founder and Executive Director of Dense Breasts Canada (DBC). She was diagnosed with breast cancer in October 2014. Inspired by the successful advocacy and education efforts of similar American organizations, Jennie co-founded DBC with Michelle Di Tomaso in 2016. They teamed up with breast cancer survivors, dedicated individuals, and health care professionals nationwide to raise awareness of the risks of dense breasts and advocate for patient notification of breast density and access to supplemental screening. She is fighting for necessary revisions to the current Canadian Task Force breast cancer screening guidelines, which put women's lives at risk. In 2021, Jennie was named a top 5 finalist in Charity Village's awards in the category of Most Outstanding Impact by a Volunteer.
Report Back from SGO 2023: What’s New in Cervical Cancer?bkling
Curious about what’s new in cervical cancer research? Join Dr. Evelyn Cantillo, gynecologic oncologist at Weill Cornell Medicine, as she shares the latest updates from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2023 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer. Dr. Cantillo will also highlight what the research presented at the conference means for you and answer your questions about the new developments.
Report Back from SGO 2024: What’s the Latest in Cervical Cancer?bkling
Are you curious about what’s new in cervical cancer research or unsure what the findings mean? Join Dr. Emily Ko, a gynecologic oncologist at Penn Medicine, to learn about the latest updates from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2024 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer. Dr. Ko will discuss what the research presented at the conference means for you and answer your questions about the new developments.
A prospective study of breast lump andclinicopathologicalanalysis in relation...iosrjce
IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences is one of the speciality Journal in Dental Science and Medical Science published by International Organization of Scientific Research (IOSR). The Journal publishes papers of the highest scientific merit and widest possible scope work in all areas related to medical and dental science. The Journal welcome review articles, leading medical and clinical research articles, technical notes, case reports and others.
Cervical cancer global burden and where do we stand todayNiranjan Chavan
Cervical cancer is the 4th most common cancer in women worldwide but most common cause of cancer related death in India.
All over the world, including India, there is decreasing trend of cervical cancer.
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice toward Cervical Cancer and Cervical Cancer S...ijtsrd
BACKGROUND Invasive Cervical Cancer ICC has been identified as the second most common cause of morbidity and mortality compared to other cancers among women in Cameroon. Cervical cancer can be treated e ectively if diagnosed early. Less than half the number of participants presented with good practice.The correlation between participants’ knowledge, attitude and practice showed that there was a significant association which therefore provides sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. The result obtained in this study indicates how useful it will be to establish health education programs to increase women’s awareness and knowledge about cervical cancer. Fongang Che Landis | Enow-Orock George | Njajou Omer | Ngowe Ngowe Marcelin "Knowledge, Attitude and Practice toward Cervical Cancer and Cervical Cancer Screening and Its Associated Factors among Women in the City of Bamenda, Cameroon" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-5 | Issue-4 , June 2021, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.compapers/ijtsrd43667.pdf Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.commedicine/other/43667/knowledge-attitude-and-practice-toward-cervical-cancer-and-cervical-cancer-screening-and-its-associated-factors-among-women-in-the-city-of-bamenda-cameroon/fongang-che-landis
How general internists can participate in the continuum of care for patients with cancer. (Talk given at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds, St. Elizabeth Hospital, General Santos City, 10 Feb 2021.)
Ca cervix epidemiology,screening and preventionDrAnkitaPatel
CA CERVIX IS PREVENTABLE AND CURABLE IF DETECTED AT EARLY STAGE .VACCINATION, PAP SMEAR AND HPV VACCINATION ARE KEY COMPONENTS FOR PREVENTION AND EARLY DETECTION.
We understand the unique challenges pickleball players face and are committed to helping you stay healthy and active. In this presentation, we’ll explore the three most common pickleball injuries and provide strategies for prevention and treatment.
CRISPR-Cas9, a revolutionary gene-editing tool, holds immense potential to reshape medicine, agriculture, and our understanding of life. But like any powerful tool, it comes with ethical considerations.
Unveiling CRISPR: This naturally occurring bacterial defense system (crRNA & Cas9 protein) fights viruses. Scientists repurposed it for precise gene editing (correction, deletion, insertion) by targeting specific DNA sequences.
The Promise: CRISPR offers exciting possibilities:
Gene Therapy: Correcting genetic diseases like cystic fibrosis.
Agriculture: Engineering crops resistant to pests and harsh environments.
Research: Studying gene function to unlock new knowledge.
The Peril: Ethical concerns demand attention:
Off-target Effects: Unintended DNA edits can have unforeseen consequences.
Eugenics: Misusing CRISPR for designer babies raises social and ethical questions.
Equity: High costs could limit access to this potentially life-saving technology.
The Path Forward: Responsible development is crucial:
International Collaboration: Clear guidelines are needed for research and human trials.
Public Education: Open discussions ensure informed decisions about CRISPR.
Prioritize Safety and Ethics: Safety and ethical principles must be paramount.
CRISPR offers a powerful tool for a better future, but responsible development and addressing ethical concerns are essential. By prioritizing safety, fostering open dialogue, and ensuring equitable access, we can harness CRISPR's power for the benefit of all. (2998 characters)
Telehealth Psychology Building Trust with Clients.pptxThe Harvest Clinic
Telehealth psychology is a digital approach that offers psychological services and mental health care to clients remotely, using technologies like video conferencing, phone calls, text messaging, and mobile apps for communication.
Medical Technology Tackles New Health Care Demand - Research Report - March 2...pchutichetpong
M Capital Group (“MCG”) predicts that with, against, despite, and even without the global pandemic, the medical technology (MedTech) industry shows signs of continuous healthy growth, driven by smaller, faster, and cheaper devices, growing demand for home-based applications, technological innovation, strategic acquisitions, investments, and SPAC listings. MCG predicts that this should reflects itself in annual growth of over 6%, well beyond 2028.
According to Chris Mouchabhani, Managing Partner at M Capital Group, “Despite all economic scenarios that one may consider, beyond overall economic shocks, medical technology should remain one of the most promising and robust sectors over the short to medium term and well beyond 2028.”
There is a movement towards home-based care for the elderly, next generation scanning and MRI devices, wearable technology, artificial intelligence incorporation, and online connectivity. Experts also see a focus on predictive, preventive, personalized, participatory, and precision medicine, with rising levels of integration of home care and technological innovation.
The average cost of treatment has been rising across the board, creating additional financial burdens to governments, healthcare providers and insurance companies. According to MCG, cost-per-inpatient-stay in the United States alone rose on average annually by over 13% between 2014 to 2021, leading MedTech to focus research efforts on optimized medical equipment at lower price points, whilst emphasizing portability and ease of use. Namely, 46% of the 1,008 medical technology companies in the 2021 MedTech Innovator (“MTI”) database are focusing on prevention, wellness, detection, or diagnosis, signaling a clear push for preventive care to also tackle costs.
In addition, there has also been a lasting impact on consumer and medical demand for home care, supported by the pandemic. Lockdowns, closure of care facilities, and healthcare systems subjected to capacity pressure, accelerated demand away from traditional inpatient care. Now, outpatient care solutions are driving industry production, with nearly 70% of recent diagnostics start-up companies producing products in areas such as ambulatory clinics, at-home care, and self-administered diagnostics.
Navigating Challenges: Mental Health, Legislation, and the Prison System in B...Guillermo Rivera
This conference will delve into the intricate intersections between mental health, legal frameworks, and the prison system in Bolivia. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current challenges faced by mental health professionals working within the legislative and correctional landscapes. Topics of discussion will include the prevalence and impact of mental health issues among the incarcerated population, the effectiveness of existing mental health policies and legislation, and potential reforms to enhance the mental health support system within prisons.
Leading the Way in Nephrology: Dr. David Greene's Work with Stem Cells for Ki...Dr. David Greene Arizona
As we watch Dr. Greene's continued efforts and research in Arizona, it's clear that stem cell therapy holds a promising key to unlocking new doors in the treatment of kidney disease. With each study and trial, we step closer to a world where kidney disease is no longer a life sentence but a treatable condition, thanks to pioneers like Dr. David Greene.
R3 Stem Cells and Kidney Repair A New Horizon in Nephrology.pptxR3 Stem Cell
R3 Stem Cells and Kidney Repair: A New Horizon in Nephrology" explores groundbreaking advancements in the use of R3 stem cells for kidney disease treatment. This insightful piece delves into the potential of these cells to regenerate damaged kidney tissue, offering new hope for patients and reshaping the future of nephrology.
Women's Access to Healthcare - GRU Cancer Center Presentation
1. Cervix Cancer and GA
Sharad Ghamande, MD FACOG
Professor and Director Gynecologic Oncology, GRU
Associate Director Clinical Affairs , GRU Cancer Center, Augusta GA
Principal Investigator Minority NCORP GA Cares
2.
3. 64,928
Europe
67,078
Africa
49,025
South America
14,845
United States/
Canada
1,077
Australia/
New Zealand
39,648
Southeast
Asia
51,266
Eastern Asia
21,596
Central America
151,297
Southcentral
Asia
Cervical Cancer: Worldwide Prevalence,
Incidence, and Mortality Estimates
Prevalence: 2,274,000 women have cervical cancer
Incidence: 510,000 new cases each year
80% in developing countries
Mortality: Second leading cause of female cancer-related deaths (288,000 annually)
Estimated individual loss of life: 25.9 years
(Breast Cancer: 19 years, Ovarian Cancer: 17.4 years)
4. Cervix Cancer in US
• American Cancer Society 2015
• 12,900 cases of cervix cancer a year, 4100
patients will die of it this year
• Additionally there are 300,000 cases of CIN2/3
which are true cancer precursors
• Another 1.2 million women in US have a low
grade dysplasia (CIN 1)
• Total health care costs of screening and treating
cervix cancer are estimated at 6 billion dollars a
year
5. 1. Jemal A et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225-49.
2. Saslow D et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:7-28.
3. ACS. Facts & Figures. 2009.
High Impact of Cervical Cancer & Precancerous
Lesions in the United States
Every minute a woman is diagnosed with a precancerous lesion2,a,b
Every 2 hours a woman dies of cervical cancer3,a
Every hour a woman is diagnosed with cervical cancer3,a
aEstimated
bPrecancerous lesion = cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2/3
In the United States, cervical cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in women between the
ages of 20 and 391
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. GA Racial Distribution
• According to the 2010 U.S. Census, Georgia had a population of 9,687,653.
In terms of race the population was:
• 59.7% White American (55.9% Non-Hispanic White, 3.8% White Hispanic),
• 30.5% Black or African American (including Hispanics)
• 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native (including Hispanics)
• 3.2% Asian American (including Hispanics)
• 0.1% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander (including Hispanics)
• 4.0% from Some Other Race (including Hispanics)
• 2.1% Multiracial American (including Hispanics)
• 8.8% Hispanics and Latinos of any race.[5]
11. How can we make an impact ?
1) Prevention
- Widespread use of Pap smears
- Improve Vaccination
2) Treat CIN 2/3 and prevent invasive cancers ( Insurance and access
barriers)
3) Improve the care and outcomes of women with cervix cancer
12. Cervical Cancer: Have We Decreased the Incidence
in the U.S.?
• The curve has been
stable for the past
decade in part because
we are not reaching the
unscreened population.
With the advent of the Pap
smear, the incidence of
cervical cancer has
dramatically declined.
74% decline in death from
1955 to 1992
Reprinted by
permission of the
American Cancer
Society, Inc.
13.
14. CIN 2-3 rates
• Annual incidence of CIN 1 is 1.6, CIN 2/3 is 1.2 per 1,000 women
• Incidence is highest
• women aged 21 – 30 years with CIN 1 is 3.3 per 1000 and CIN 2/3 is 3.6 per
1000
• women aged 31 – 40 years with 2.9 per 1000 for CIN1 and CIN 2/3 is 2.7 per
1000
• Costs per episode of care was higher for CIN 2/3 than for CIN 1
• $ 1,634 for CIN 2/3 vs $ 1,084 for CIN 1
• Estimated 412,000 women are diagnosed with CIN annually with an
associated cost of approximately $570 million [1]
[1] Henk et al.: Incidence and costs of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a US commercially insured population.
J lower tract dis, 2010, Vol 14, 29-36
15. Costs of Treating Cervical Cancer
• Cost of cervical cancer treatment: implications for providing coverage to low-income women under the Medicaid
expansion for cancer care. Subramanian S1, Trogdon J, Ekwueme DU, Gardner JG, Whitmire JT, Rao C.
• BACKGROUND:
• To date, no study has reported on the cost of treating cervical cancer among Medicaid beneficiaries
younger than 65 years of age. This information is essential for assessing the cost effectiveness of
screening interventions for low-income women and the funding required for treatment programs
established by the Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act of 2000.
• METHODS:
• Administrative data from the North Carolina Medicaid program linked with cancer registry data were used
to analyze total Medicaid costs for these patients and the incremental costs of cervical cancer care at 6
and 12 months from diagnosis. We compared 207 beneficiaries diagnosed with cancer during the years
2002 to 2004 with 414 controls.
• FINDINGS:
• Total Medicaid costs at 6 months after diagnosis were $3,807, $23,187, $35,853, and $45,028 for in situ,
local, regional, and distant cancers, respectively.
• The incremental cost of cancer treatment for local and regional cancers was $13,935 and $26,174 and by
12 months increased to $15,868 and $30,917, respectively
• 2010 Nov-Dec;20(6):400-5. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2010.07.002.
16. Cervical Cancer – Risk Factors
• Multiple sexual partners
• Early age onset intercourse
• Parity
• H/O STD’s
• Smoking
• Low socioeconomic status
• Use of Oral Contraceptives
• High risk male partner
17. Cervical Cancer - Risk Factors
• HIV
• RR 5.2-6.5 of cervical cancer
• 1993 CDC: AIDS defining illness
• mean age at diagnosis 40
• HPV
• OR 158.2 for HPV
• High risk 16,18,45,31,33,52,58,35
18. 0 20 40 60 80 100
16
18
45
31
HPV X
33
52
58
35
59
56
57.6%
71.7%
77.4%
81.3%
85.%
87.9%
90.1%
91.8%
93.3%
94.6%
95.7%
HPV types from 3,045 Women with Cervical Cancer in 23 countries
19. HPV vaccination
• HPV 4
• Approved for females and males 9 – 26
• Contains HPV 16/18/6/11
• HPV 2
• Approved for females and males 9 – 25
• Contains HPV 16/18
• A 9-valent vaccine licensed in December 2014
• Contains additional 5 HPV types 31/33/45/52/58
20. HPV vaccination in GA adolescents
Year Females Males
> 1 HPV (
95%CL)
> 2 HPV (
95%CL)
> 3 HPV (
95%CL)
> 1 HPV (
95%CL)
> 2 HPV (
95%CL)
> 3HPV (
95%CL)
2014 65.4 56.3 47.1 41.2 28.0 21.0
2013 53.7 42.3 33.2 40.5 31.0 15.3
2012 52.3 36.8 29 19.5 8.7 N/A
2011 48.4 N/A 30.0 7.3 N/A N/A
2010 All adolescences 43.5 % received > or = 1 HPV, 22.8 % received > or = to 3 HPV
2009 All adolescences > or = to 1 HPV 38.6 %
2008 All adolescences > or = to 1 HPV 18.5 %
Estimated vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13--17 years,* by state and selected areas and selected vaccines
and doses --- National Immunization Survey--Teen, United States, 2008 – 2014, MMWR – CDC, cdc.gov/mmwr/review
21. Estimated vaccination coverage with ≥1 dose of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine* among females aged
13–17 years. (United States, National Immunization Survey–Teen, 2014)
22. Estimated vaccination coverage with ≥1 dose of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine* among males aged
13–17 years (United States, National Immunization Survey–Teen, 2014)
23. HPV Vaccination
• CDC
• If we increase vaccination rates to 80%, an additional 53,000 new
cases of invasive cervix cancers could be prevented in the life time of
those younger than 12 years
• For very additional year increase, an additional 4400 women will go
on to have cervical cancer
24. HPV vaccine recommendations
• ACIP recommends routine vaccination at age 11 or 12 with HP4 for
males and females and HPV 2 for females
• Vaccination schedule is 0,1-2, 6 months
• ACOG and CDC proclaim that “the current vaccination rates are
unacceptable”
25. Can we create centers of excellence for
cancer care ?
• Impact of facility volume on therapy and survival for locally advanced
cervical cancer
• Jeff F. Lin a,⁎, Jessica L. Berger a, Thomas C. Krivak a,b, Sushil Beriwal
a, John K. Chan c, Paniti Sukumvanich a, Bradley J. Monk d,e, Scott D.
Richard
• Gynecologic Oncology 132 (2014) 416
26. Lin et al
• Methods: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients
with stage IIB – IIIB cervical cancer from 1/1998 through 12/2010.
Facility volumes were tallied. Overall survival was estimated using
Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariable analyses were
performed to determine variables affecting survival, receiving
standard therapy, and total duration of radiotherapy.
• Results. Total of 27,660 patients were treated at 1361 facilities.
Thirty of the facilities (2.2%) treated the highest quartile volume of
patients (9.4 patients annually) while 1072 facilities (78.8%) treated
(2.4 patients annually).
• The median age of patients was 53, the majority were Caucasian,
treated in a metropolitan area, and of squamous cell histology.
27. Lin et al
• Median survival of patients treated at lowest- and highest volume
centers were 42.3 months (95% CI 39.8–44.8) and 53.8 months (50.1–
57.5), respectively (p b 0.001).
• The proportions of patients receiving brachytherapy and chemotherapy
were 54.8% and 79.9%, respectively.
• On multivariable analysis, higher facility volume independently predicted
improved survival (p = 0.022), increased likelihood of receiving
brachytherapy (p b 0.0005) and chemotherapy (p = 0.013), and shorter
time to radiotherapy completion (p b 0.0005).
• Conclusions. Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated at high
volume centers are more likely to receive standard therapy, complete
therapy sooner, and experience better survival.
28. Paradigm Shift in Care ?
• Encouragement towards shifting care towards High Volume /
subspeciality staffed institutions ?
• Emerging survival data
• Clinical trials participation
• Multi Disciplinary team approach
• Technological advances ( PET/CT’s, Robot assisted radical surgeries)
• Individualization of care