I've spent the last 2 weeks without TV news and newspapers. I relied solely on my social networks of peers to gather my information on what's going on in the world.
This is a preliminary look at how this affected me.
10. Alone, no one would
consider me a professional
journalist.
Me
Professional
11. But together with a group of individuals, an
observer could get as good, or better information
than that of a professional.
Professional
= My Network
14. Opinions are better than objectivity
News isnāt as bad as I thought
People are coordinated
News benefits from many sources
15. Opinions are better than objectivity
People that feel free to voice their opinions often provide the emotion required to
completely understand a story. Large networks usually provide a number of passionate
people who feel differently about issues. Listening to them is a great way to understand
more about a story than a objective news report.
News isnāt as bad as I thought
People are coordinated
News benefits from many sources
16. Opinions are better than objectivity
People that feel free to voice their opinions often provide the emotion required to
completely understand a story. Large networks usually provide a number of passionate
people who feel differently about issues. Listening to them is a great way to understand
more about a story than a objective news report.
News isnāt as bad as I thought
Some news agencies sensationalize bad news to evoke a stronger emotional reaction
(among other reasons). Peer-News often (at least in my experience) focuses on positive
news. (upcoming events, cool thoughts, new gadgets, useful tools, etc)
People are coordinated
News benefits from many sources
17. Opinions are better than objectivity
People that feel free to voice their opinions often provide the emotion required to
completely understand a story. Large networks usually provide a number of passionate
people who feel differently about issues. Listening to them is a great way to understand
more about a story than a objective news report.
News isnāt as bad as I thought
Some news agencies sensationalize bad news to evoke a stronger emotional reaction
(among other reasons). Peer-News often (at least in my experience) focuses on positive
news. (upcoming events, cool thoughts, new gadgets, useful tools, etc)
People are coordinated
With the introduction of social networking tools like Twitter, Facebook, Blogs, Podcasts,
Youtube, and the like; uncoordinated individuals have the ability to coordinate on issues.
News benefits from many sources
18. Opinions are better than objectivity
People that feel free to voice their opinions often provide the emotion required to
completely understand a story. Large networks usually provide a number of passionate
people who feel differently about issues. Listening to them is a great way to understand
more about a story than a objective news report.
News isnāt as bad as I thought
Some news agencies sensationalize bad news to evoke a stronger emotional reaction
(among other reasons). Peer-News often (at least in my experience) focuses on positive
news. (upcoming events, cool thoughts, new gadgets, useful tools, etc)
People are coordinated
With the introduction of social networking tools like Twitter, Facebook, Blogs, Podcasts,
Youtube, and the like; uncoordinated individuals have the ability to coordinate on issues.
News benefits from many sources
They key to the rise of the professional network is that a network can have āsleeper
participantsā who might rarely participate, but live outside the spectrum of normal news,
and have connections that might provide unique insight when they do participate.