CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: HISTORY OF THE USA. SECTIONAL TENSIONS IN THE UNITED ST...George Dumitrache
CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: HISTORY OF THE USA. SECTIONAL TENSIONS IN THE UNITED STATES. Slavery, economic and social differences, cultural differences, political issues, the revolution.
CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: HISTORY OF THE USA. THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 AND ITS BREA...George Dumitrache
CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: HISTORY OF THE USA. THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 AND ITS BREAKDOWN. Key issues, the compromise of 1850, the Kansas-Nebraska Act 1854, formation of the Republican Party.
The 2nd and 3rd lectures for 1st year's students of English are devoted to the history of immigration to the United States from the Pilgrim Fathers to most recent legislation on immigration
CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: HISTORY OF THE USA. SECTIONAL TENSIONS IN THE UNITED ST...George Dumitrache
CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: HISTORY OF THE USA. SECTIONAL TENSIONS IN THE UNITED STATES. Slavery, economic and social differences, cultural differences, political issues, the revolution.
CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: HISTORY OF THE USA. THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 AND ITS BREA...George Dumitrache
CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: HISTORY OF THE USA. THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 AND ITS BREAKDOWN. Key issues, the compromise of 1850, the Kansas-Nebraska Act 1854, formation of the Republican Party.
The 2nd and 3rd lectures for 1st year's students of English are devoted to the history of immigration to the United States from the Pilgrim Fathers to most recent legislation on immigration
The Age of Jackson - GSE SSUSH7a: explain Jacksonian Democracy, including expanding suffrage, the Nullification Crisis & states' rights, and the Indian Removal Act of 1830.
Ch 13THE IMPENDING CRISIS· LOOKING WESTWARD· EXPANSION AND WMaximaSheffield592
Ch 13
THE IMPENDING CRISIS
· LOOKING WESTWARD
· EXPANSION AND WAR
· THE SECTIONAL DEBATE
· THE CRISES OF THE 1850s
LOOKING AHEAD
1. How did the annexation of western territories intensify the conflict over slavery and lead to deeper divisions between the North and the South?
2. What compromises attempted to resolve the conflicts over the expansion of slavery into new territories? To what degree were these compromises successful? Why did they eventually fail to resolve the differences between the North and the South?
3. What were the major arguments for and against slavery and its expansion into new territories?
UNTIL THE 1840s, POLITICAL TENSIONS between the North and the South remained relatively contained and, other than African American writers and clerics, few predicted that sectional tensions could ever lead the country into a civil war.
But midcentury brought a rash of explosive issues that politicians struggled—and ultimately failed—to resolve peacefully. In the North the abolitionist movement picked up steam and inspired legions of supporters, the most aggressive of whom sought to fight slavery with the sword as well as the pen. The South birthed a generation of militant pro-slavery spokesmen who brooked no compromise over a state’s right to embrace slavery and the society based on it. From the West emerged raging controversies over the political fate of the territories and whether they would enter the Union as either slave or free states. Partisans recruited sympathizers from across the nation and even took up arms to win their point.LOOKING WESTWARD
More than a million square miles of new territory came under the control of the United States during the 1840s. By the end of the decade, the nation possessed all the territory of the present-day United States except Alaska, Hawaii, and a few relatively small areas acquired later through border adjustments. Many factors accounted for this great new wave of expansion, but one of the most important was an ideology known as Manifest Destiny.
Manifest Destiny
Manifest Destiny reflected both the growing pride that characterized American nationalism in the mid-nineteenth century and the idealistic vision of social perfection that fueled so much of the reform energy of the time. It rested on the idea that America was destined—by God and by history—to expand its boundaries over a vast area.
By the 1840s, publicized by the rise of inexpensive newspapers dubbed “penny press,” the idea of Manifest Destiny had spread throughout the nation. Some advocates of Manifest Destiny envisioned a vast new “empire of liberty” that would include Canada, Mexico, Caribbean and Pacific islands, and ultimately (for the most ardent believers) much of the rest of the world. Countering such bombast were politicians such as Henry Clay and others, who warned that territorial expansion would reopen the painful controversy over slavery. Their voices, however, could not compete with the enthusiasm over expansion in the 18 ...