Download to read offline
![[INC 281 MULTIDISCIPLINARY WORKSHOP WEEKLY REPORT] January 19, 2012
Name-Surname Krongkaew Saowaros
Student ID. 53211802
Group Name 361 Degree Happiness Company
Baitong 53211802
Engineering
Toey 53211807
Team Members
Bank 53211814
P’Earth
Product Design P’Ka-tai
Team Members P’Klao
P’Chompoo
Weekly Progress
Today in the morning, our group has participated in listen teaching by Aj. Wuthichai
about Basic Electronics. To guide their work product design between our students and his
architecture. And then listen to the presentation of ID students of what he thought and his
ideas. In the afternoon, have to listen to comment's the professor of architecture. I have
found that the model is designed, Not yet reached the concept of the blank. It is only
superficial. The professor of architecture and to help brainstorm ideas together must be the
choice over this. This time the engineer and wait. Involved in thinking about his architecture
We think that in life we do, what to do daily. And what we do is find the problem. We
wanted to create a new product to meet their needs and solve those problems.
Figure 1. The thinking of my group Figure 2. Group’s discussion
Engineering Analysis
Strong Point
- The relationship in my group is good relationship so in the work that easy and
smooth.
- Group members have different ideas; make it a variety of formats.
Week Point
- We can't understand the core of concept, making it impossible to reach the goal.
Next Week Job
- We need to understand the core of concept, have been concluded together. And a
summary of ideas into products.
Department of Control System and Instrumentation Engineering
KING MONGKUT’s UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY THONBURI](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/weeklyreport2-120124131007-phpapp02/85/Weekly-report-2-1-320.jpg)
Uploaded byBaiTong BaiTong
Weekly report 2
This weekly report summarizes the progress of a multidisciplinary student group working on a product design. It discusses their participation in lectures on basic electronics and architecture. The group received feedback from architecture professors that their initial model did not fully realize the design concept. Moving forward, they plan to brainstorm more with their architecture mentor to better understand the core concept and transform their ideas into a product that solves real problems.
More Related Content
Weekly report 2
- 1. [INC 281 MULTIDISCIPLINARYWORKSHOP WEEKLY REPORT] January 19, 2012 Name-Surname Krongkaew Saowaros Student ID. 53211802 Group Name 361 Degree Happiness Company Baitong 53211802 Engineering Toey 53211807 Team Members Bank 53211814 P’Earth Product Design P’Ka-tai Team Members P’Klao P’Chompoo Weekly Progress Today in the morning, our group has participated in listen teaching by Aj. Wuthichai about Basic Electronics. To guide their work product design between our students and his architecture. And then listen to the presentation of ID students of what he thought and his ideas. In the afternoon, have to listen to comment's the professor of architecture. I have found that the model is designed, Not yet reached the concept of the blank. It is only superficial. The professor of architecture and to help brainstorm ideas together must be the choice over this. This time the engineer and wait. Involved in thinking about his architecture We think that in life we do, what to do daily. And what we do is find the problem. We wanted to create a new product to meet their needs and solve those problems. Figure 1. The thinking of my group Figure 2. Group’s discussion Engineering Analysis Strong Point - The relationship in my group is good relationship so in the work that easy and smooth. - Group members have different ideas; make it a variety of formats. Week Point - We can't understand the core of concept, making it impossible to reach the goal. Next Week Job - We need to understand the core of concept, have been concluded together. And a summary of ideas into products. Department of Control System and Instrumentation Engineering KING MONGKUT’s UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY THONBURI