2. Outline of Presentation
1. Identification
2. History and Physical Examination
3. Progress of the patient
4. Circumstance of the death
5. Comments
6. Discussion
7. Take home message
8. References
3. Identification
NAME - T.Z
AGE - 45
SEX - MALE
ADDRESS - OROMIA,GOBA
MARTIAL STATUS - MARRIED
DOA - 06/02/2010 E.C
DOD - 19/02/2010 E.C
4.
5. Medical History at ER [02-03/02/2010]
This is a 45 y/o M patient who is a diagnosed patient with SCC of the right inguinal
region with vertebral bone Metastasis on his 3rd Chemo [cisplatin/paclitaxel -
Q21days] and Radiotherapy (palliative) @ TASH over the past year; Paraplegic
patient 20 to Compressive Myelopathy 20 to Vertebral Metastasis 08 month.
Presented with change in mentation of 02 weeks duration, with failure of
communication, Low Grade Intermittent Fever, Easy fatigability, Loss of appetite and
Unquantified amount of weight loss.
Associated with a Gradual Decrease in Urine output and generalized body swelling
starting from legs and involving abdomen in 03 days.
He was being treated at home by a local health professional, Given 2 Liters of
Parenteral fluids daily for 03 days for a complaint of difficulty of taking oral meals.
6. Medical History…
Otherwise:
No abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation or yellowish eye discoloration.
No trauma hx, abnormal body movement, loss of consciousness or body weakness.
No reddish discoloration of urine, dysuria, urgency, frequency prior to obstructive symptoms
No bleeding sites, body rash or joint pain
No known chronic illness.
No Previous TB treatment or contact with TB patient
No history of smoking or alcohol intake.
No family history of bleeding disorder or similar illness.
7. Physical Examination
General Appearance : Acutely sick on Chronic basis.
Vital Sign: BP: 108/70 PR:112 RR: 20 T:36.70c SpO2: 97%,on ambient air
HEENT: Pale conjunctivae, Non-icteric sclera, Prominent Zygoma
LGS: No LAP, Thyroid not enlarged
CHEST: Decreased air entry on the lower 1/3 bilaterally with Coarse creps on post 1/3 chest.
CVS: Heart sounds (S1/S2) are well heard, no murmur or gallop.
8. Physical Examination…
Abdomen: Distended abdomen with slit umbilicus, soft, moves with respiration. No
Organomegally There is a 4*3 cm fungating mass at RLQ region, Suprapubic transverse surgical
scar from previous operation. Distended bladder.
GUS: No CVAT.
INT/MSS: Grade 3 Pedal/Pretibial/Sacral edema.
CNS: Conscious but disoriented, GCS 15/15
No cranial nerve deficit
Hypotonic Lower extremities with 0/4 Power.
Meningeal signs- absent
9. Cont..
Initial ASST:
◦ ?Pyonephrosis with Urosepsis
◦ AKI 20 to ?Septic ATN
◦ Anasarca 2o to ? Fluid Overload
◦ Uremic Encephalopathy
◦ SCC on Chemo radio Rx
10. Cont..
Plan:
CBC with Blood Group , OFT, Electrolytes, UAs, Occult Blood, Urine Culture, Blood
Culture, ESR, HBsAg, PICT.
◦ Abdominal U/s, CXR
◦ Catheter inserted drained 2 Liters of Turbid Urine.
◦ Ciprofloxacillin 400mg IV BID and Vancomycin 1gm IV BID initiated.
◦ PCM 1gm Po PRN
12. Investigations (03/02/2010)
Abdominal U/s:
• Liver has normal size, sharp edges and smooth contour, Normal homogenous echo pattern.
• Right kidney measures 9.7*4cm with Normal Corticomedullary Differentiation and cortical
echogenicity.
• Left Kidney measures 10.1*5.2 cm with dilated pelvis and calyces, with echo debris on dilated
pelvis.
• Index_ Left side minimal hydronephrosis with ?Pyonephrosis.
13. Emergency Resident Note [05/02/2010]
History: SAME + 2 weeks history of change in behavior where he talks irrelevant words and
subsequently became less communicable. For last 1 week prior to admission he had decrease in
urine amount, generalized body swelling starting from legs and involving the abdomen, LGIF,
Sweating, Loss of appetite
P/Ex: O - Acutely Sick Looking
◦ V/s: BP: 70/40 PR: 102 Weak RR: 20/min To: 36.4 Sao2: 91% with Atm Air
◦ GUS: UOP 500ml of clear concentrated urine/20hrs: no CVAT
◦ MSS: Left Inguinal healed scar/Right inguinal 4*2 cm fungating mass + HOMANS Sign –ve
◦ CNS: GCS [E4/V4/M5] 13/15
14. Cont..
REASST:
◦ SAME + Septic Shock with Urosepsis + Anasarca 20 to Severe Hypoalbuminemia.
Plan:
◦ Resuscitate with 500ml of NS fast then initiate Adrenaline Drip 50>>150 drops/min [2mg/500ml]
◦ Continue Ciprofloxacillin/Vancomycin + Ceftazidime with renal dose adjustment.
◦ GI Prophylaxis; NG tube feeding 300ml/4hrs ; RBS QID
◦ DVT Prophylaxis UFH 7,500 SC BID
◦ Consult Urology side and Renal side
15. Investigations (05/02/2010)
15
RFT
Cr 1.49 mg/dl
BUN 79.1 mg/dl
LFT
ALP 102.6 IU/L
GPT 14.3 IU/L
GOT 39.1 IU/L
Albumin 1.81gm/dl
DB 0.16
TB 0.1629
Serum Electrolytes
Na+ 138.2
K+ 3.94
Cl- 104.2
Total Ca+ 3.88
Serum
Phosphate
1.17
16. Ward Admission Note [06/02/10]
P: Same + Aspiration Pneumonia + ? Neurogenic Bladder + Chronic Left Leg DVT not on OAC [TASH
Historically]
S: Uncommunicative
O: G/A: ASL
◦ BP: 90/50 PR: 104 (Full) T: 37.7℃ Spo2: 93% with Atm air
Chest: Bilateral diffuse coarse Crepitations and transmitted sound
CNS: GCS [E3/V3/M5] 11/15 ; -ve Meningeal Signs
Plan :Continue resuscitation until BP>90/60 ; Added Metronidazole; NG tube Feeding planned but patient
refused and was put on Maintenance Fluid. CBC, CXR.
22. Investigations (12/02/2010)
Left Leg Doppler U/s:
• The common femoral veins are not completely compressible with anechoic content and have
no flow bilaterally.
• There is Significant subcutaneous edema of both Legs (More on the Left Leg).
• Impression_ Bilateral Acute DVT of the Common Femoral Veins.
28. Progress Note [17/02/2010]
P: SAME + Impending T1 Respiratory failure 20 Massive PE
S: Fast Breathing
O: G/A: ASL
◦ BP: 80/50 PR: 104 RR:32 T: 37.7℃ Spo2: 83% with 15 L Of Facemask.
Chest: Bilateral diffuse coarse Crepitations and transmitted sound
CNS: GCS [E3/V5/M6] 14/15 ; -ve Meningeal Signs
A: Deteriorating
Plan : Continue resuscitation until BP>90/60
29. Death Circumstance [19/02/2010]
Despite max dose of Dopamine and epinephrine, BP was low and He became bradycardic.
CPR was tried *4 Cycles with 3 doses of Adrenalin
At 12:45 Am, Death Confirmed, he had no cardiac activity, Pupils dilated and Fixed.
Cause of Death:
◦ Cardiorespiratory Arrest 20 to Massive PE
◦ Refractory Septic Shock of Pulmonary Focus
35. Comments
Good Chart keeping
Adequate progress notes
Orders revised timely
V/s & Sao2 followed closely
Good antibiotic coverage
Management Pitfalls
Serial Monitoring Platelets; D dimer;
Antithrombin 3; Protein C; Fibrinogen
levels.
Enoxaparin Initiation?
Delayed Consideration of DVT?
ICU Admission?
Hematology Consultation?
36. THE PATIENT CASE
A 45 y/o M patient with Squamous Cell Cancer of the right inguinal region with vertebral bone
Metastasis on his 3rd Chemo [cisplatin/paclitaxel - Q21days] and Radiotherapy (palliative) @
TASH over the past year
Paraplegic patient 20 to Compressive Myelopathy 20 to Vertebral Metastasis 08 month.
Obstructive Uropathy 20 to ?Neurogenic Bladder with Urosepsis.
On UFH 7500 IU SC BID for 04 days; Platelets dropped from baseline 254,000>>>34,000.
Heparin stopped for 04 days Platelets recovered from 34,000>>193,000.
New onset Thrombosis diagnosed and started treatment with Enoxaparin.
Succumbed at 19/02/2010 with cause of death being CRA 20 to Massive PE + Refractory
Septic Shock.
46. HEP SCORE [HIT Expert Probability Score]
The HIT expert probability score (HEP) is a more detailed system developed
to improve on the diagnostic utility of the 4Ts score.
Testing in a validation cohort showed that the HEP model was 100% sensitive
and 60% specific for determining the presence of HIT at Cutoff of [2]
But at Cutoff of [5] 86% Sensitivity and 88% Specific , and demonstrated
better correlation with serologic HIT testing and better inter observer
agreement than the 4Ts score.
Nevertheless, the researchers cautioned that prospective multicenter
validation is warranted.
The Patient’s HEP SCORE = 5
54. Take Home Message
Immediate discontinuation of ALL HEPARIN PRODUCTS in HIT
suspected cases.
Treating clotting with the Use of Alternative OAC (Novel Agents)
that are available in our setup like [Rivaroxaban].
More stringent probability testing like HEP in addition to 4T Score
to further Investigate or Change Anticoagulation.
Early suspicion of Thromboembolism in HIT Suspected cases.
Have a Flow Diagram for HIT Management in our Setup.
56. Reference
Harrison’s Principles of Internal medicine 19th ed.
Up-to-date 21.6
Warkentin TE, Kelton JG. Interaction of Heparin with Platelets, Including Heparin-Induced
Thrombocytopenia. Bounameaux: Marcel Dekker, 1994:75±127.
University of Virginia Pharmacological Paper on HIT
Patient’s Chart
Editor's Notes
08 months prior started to have a swelling at right inguinal area, went to black lion and was dx to have SCC:
Has history of surgery 1 and half years back at ras-desta hospital.
2 liters of NS everyday for 3 days started to develop body swelling
Not fit for 4th chemo told to recuperate at home.
14 days Prior on 12/01/2010 @ TASH Bun/cr [103/2.1]; Platelet Before Initiation of UFH.
Communicated for Pyonephrosis but did not come.
Low Albumin In high catabolic state and poor intake; Fluid overload;
Inc. Capillary permeability due to sepsis.
Low Albumin In high catabolic state and poor intake.
Wells Score is less useful in Hospitalized patients. Best for Outpatient and emergency department setting[Silveria PC,2015]
If Leg is diffusely Edematous DVT Unlikely; ?Venous Insufficiency.
Low Prevalence of DVT in cases with Low <25% clinical suspicion patients.
.
Platelet First Day after Initiation of UFH.
Metronidazole
HIT Suspected DVT Prophylaxis Stopped
Platelet 4th Day after Initiation of UFH.
4TScore
If EDTA induced Platelet Clumping suspected Repeat Platelet count again with Heparin/ NA+ Citrate anticoagulant tubes.
Wells is not meant to diagnose PE but to guide workup by predicting pretest probability of PE and appropriate testing to rule out the diagnosis.
Complications
Possible complications of HIT include the following:
Deep venous thrombosis
Pulmonary embolism
Myocardial infarction
Occlusion of limb arteries (possibly resulting in amputation)
Transient ischemic attack and stroke
Skin necrosis
End-organ damage (eg, adrenal, bowel, spleen, gallbladder, or hepatic infarction; renal failure)
Death
TOOL to rule out HIT.
<=3 Low (5% Probability)
4-5 Intermediate Probability for HIT (14% Probability)
6-8 High Probability for HIT (64% Probability)
If a patient is Suspected with HIT: Direct Thrombin Inhibitors Expensive/Non reversible unlike heparin.
Low SN/SP/PPV for 4Ts & CPB Surgery pts with thrombocytopenia [Leylo Layla way]
HEP Score only used in pts with KNOWN HIT but near 90% NPV.
After stopping heparin administration in patients with HIT, the median time to achieving a platelet count of >150,000 per microliter is about four days. DR BAEUR
In one report, eight patients with deep vein thrombosis developed venous limb gangrene and full-thickness skin necrosis after heparin was stopped in response to a diagnosis of HIT and initiation of warfarin
It should be pointed out that the efficacy of non-heparin anticoagulants for HIT and their approval by the U.S. FDA was not based on prospective, randomized controlled clinical trials. Vitamin K antagonists have been used for the treatment of HIT for many years and adopted by evidence-based guidelines after initial treatment with a non-heparin anticoagulant, as they have up until recently been the only class of oral anticoagulants available. Based on our mechanistic understanding of venous-induced limb gangrene in HIT, a strong case can be made that we should be moving away from using warfarin in the initial phase of HITT (and HIT) treatment (up until 30 days after diagnosis) given that alternative oral anticoagulants that do not lower protein C levels are available.6 These oral agents selectively target thrombin or factor Xa, have a rapid onset of action, and do not require coagulation monitoring; however, there is not yet any reported experience with these agents in this patient population, and they have no specific antidote. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban have gained FDA approval for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation7, 8 and rivaroxaban is approved for the prophylaxis of VTE following total hip or knee replacement9; they have shown promising result for the treatment of symptomatic VTE but have not yet been approved for this indication in the United States. Thus, caution should be exercised if either dabigatran or rivaroxaban is used in a patient such as this; if chosen, they should be used at therapeutic doses and limited to adult patients with satisfactory renal function (creatinine clearance >30 mL/min). Furthermore, given that HIT can result in serious complications including limb loss and subsequent litigation against health-care providers, hematologists choosing to use any of the new anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or fondaparinux) should carefully document in the medical record their rationale for choosing the new agent.
Both the infrequent occurrence of HIT confirmed by validated platelet-activation assays and the clinical heterogeneity of affected patients make it difficult to perform trials of new agents in HIT. It is therefore unlikely that the new oral anticoagulants will be studied in controlled trials so as to gain FDA approval for management of this disorder in the near future. Hopefully, the reporting of well-characterized cohorts of patients with HIT (or HITT) treated with these agents will lead to favorable outcomes that will improve, as well as simplify, management of this disorder.
Currently, the non-heparin anticoagulants approved in
most countries to treat HIT are parenteral, costly and
require laboratory coagulation monitoring [8]. Rivaroxa-
ban is an ideal potential alternative for treatment of HIT
because it is administered orally by fixed dosing, requires
no routine coagulation monitoring and has been proven
to be effective in the treatment of venous and arterial
thromboembolism in other settings
To prevent HIT-related thrombotic complications,
guidelines recommend that patients with at least a moder-
ate suspicion of HIT (4Ts score ≥ 4)[6,7] should have
heparin discontinued and a non-heparin anticoagulant
started as soon as possible [8]. If a patient truly has HIT
and a non-heparin anticoagulant is not started, the
thrombotic risk may be as high as 5% per day
Choosing Wisely® is a multi-year effort led by the ABIM Foundation to support and engage physicians in being better stewards of finite health care resources. As part of Choosing Wisely, ASH and other medical societies have developed evidence-based recommendations to prompt conversations between patients and clinicians about the necessity and potential harm of certain procedures. In 2016, ASH introduced the Choosing Wisely Champions initiative to recognize the efforts of practitioners who are working to eliminate costly and potentially harmful overuse of tests and procedures.