Downloaded 12 times
Uploaded byREDERESÍDUO
Wastecosmart - Semana Lixo Zero SP 2014
1. AEB video with subtitles (12 min): Shows the different waste streams being processed at an Amsterdam waste facility, from collection through sorting and recycling or energy recovery. 2. Plastic mapping: Presents a project that mapped the flow of plastic waste in Amsterdam to identify leakage points and improve recycling. 3. Visit statesecretary to Sims Recycling solutions: Takes viewers on a tour of a large electronics recycling facility to see the advanced sorting technologies used to recover materials.
More Related Content
Similar to Wastecosmart - Semana Lixo Zero SP 2014
Wastecosmart - Semana Lixo Zero SP 2014
- 1. WASTECOSMART Semana Lixo Zero Brazil November2014 Berit, Anna and Inge
- 2. Presentation outline Introduction tous/SP/our European partners Innovative and resource efficient waste management in Europe and the WASTECOSMART toolbox (from interviews, to SWOT to MCA, alternatives and implementation) Interactive excerise: ”corners” Examples from the European regions: their main challenges for innovative resource efficient waste management towards zero waste and their planned way forward Interactive exercise: Plenum interview with color-code and quick SWOT
- 3.
- 4. Who are we? IngeJohansson Berit Gullbransson Anna Sager Łukasz Kruszyński
- 5. SP Technical ResearchInstitute of Sweden The SP Group is wholly owned by RISE Subsidiaries 9 Employees 1 400 Revenues SEK 1 300 Million Customers > 10 000
- 6. What is ””? THE INNOVATION PROCESS – WITH YOU EVERY STEP OF THE WAY > 10 000 customers Leading edge expertise Experimental resources Technical scope Interdisciplinary working method
- 7.
- 8.
- 9. Chat with ourEuropean Partners already today! @WASTECOSMART #WASTECOSMART Visit our webpage http://www.wastecosmart. eu/ Or send an email to anna.sager@sp.se
- 10. Innovative and resource efficientwaste management
- 11. Broadening strategy workby adding more perspectives to an integrated approach! Recycling (energy recovery) Reuse Minimisation Technology/ Waste chain Processes Business models Organisation Institutions Zero Waste Prevention Modification Redesign CreationAlternatives Landfill/disposal Source: OECD, adapted
- 12. WASTECOSMART concept New innovationand new thinking – Understanding the process and act and influence the direction and speed The speed and direction of innovation is the result of complex interaction between many actors The aim to work out specific strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities Self assessment tools – Close cooperation with regional partners
- 13. Networks Technology Actors Institutions Structured focus onInnovation Processes Key Innovation Processes 1. Knowledge development / diffusion 2. Direction of search 3. Legitimation 4. Resource mobilization 5. Entrepreneurial experimentation 6. Market formation 7. Positive externalities Exogenous factors
- 14. Visions & Goals Point of departure DecisionSupport Framework (DSF)/Multi criteria Analysis Actions How to cooperate Benchlearning Joint Action Plan (JAP) Waste streams Institutions / regulations Technology / infrastructure Actors / network SWOT/Value Trees Policies and regulations Resources and Markets Knowledge Development Entrepreneurial experimentation Creation of legitimacy Dynamics WASTECOSMART toolbox
- 15. Prevention Minimisation Transport Pretreatment Material recovery Post treatment andhandling of hazardous waste Sorting Energy recovery Collection Figure 3: Waste Management Chain WASTECOSMART focuses on all steps of the waste-chain Landfill
- 16.
- 17. SWOT Results Creation oflegitimacy Strengths and opportunities • Deeper knowledge helps to address societal challenges such as preventing and minimizing waste. • Various actors can work together to raise awareness about waste. • NGOs are very active in disseminating information. • Opportunity of good cooperation and involvement of citizens. • Strong involvement of the government. Weaknesses and threats • Lack of support from citizen for waste policy. • Lack of awareness • Involvement of many government authorities creates conflicts and delays. • Communities with different goals. • Short-term decisions. • Individuals and companies are not interested in patriating positively in the environmental work if they do not have personal or financial gain In return.
- 18. Paphos Budapest Piedmont LiverpoolAmsterdam Stockholm
- 19.
- 21. Examples from the Europeanregions
- 22. Exampleas from theEuropean regions Amsterdam Stockholm West Pomeriana
- 23.
- 24. The municipality ofSundbyberg A municipality in the Stockholm region Approx 43 000 inhabitants 9 km2 Fastest growing Municipality in Sweden (+1.3% between 2012- 2013)
- 25. Waste management Regional wastemanagement company SÖRAB, owned by 10 municipalities Common strategy (Waste plan) towards 2020
- 26. The process… Determining stateof play, including Visions and goals Interviews, summarized in SWOT where the main challenges were identified: 1. Urban collection systems 2. Food waste 3. Waste prevention
- 27. Challenge: How canthe city work with waste prevention? Set a good example Change of behaviour Innovation
- 28.
- 29. Two set ofalternatives; Y The municipality own operation (own facilities and organisations; schools, administrations etc.) X Municipal Solid Waste (households)
- 30. Alternatives; X Municipal SolidWaste XA. Business as usual XB. Re-use and repair center XC. Use collection system as tool to prevent waste XD. Awareness raising program XE. Yearly innovation competition
- 32. Alternatives; Y The municipalityown operation YA. Business as usual YB. Implementation of Off2off e-service promoting re-use YC. Education to prevent food waste YD. Innovative public procurement to prevent waste YE. Monitoring and visualization to prevent food waste
- 34. Feedback from theparticipants Generally they thought it to be an interesting tool with potential to use in evaluating different strategies in the waste plan Large interest to follow the continuation – to se what it ends up with
- 35.
- 36. Interactive session: “The PlenumInterview”
- 37. State of play,requirementsand conditions in Southeast Brazil Legislation/Legitimacy – new national law was implemented on the 2nd of August 2010, “National Policy for Solid Waste” (PNRS): “the following priority shall be observed: non-generation, reduction, reutilization, recycling, solid waste treatment and final environmentally-adequate waste disposal” – minimize the amount of waste to landfills, – all open dumps should be closed in 2014 Describe the nature of regions waste management as well as strategies and plans ( 3 main) – Throughout the years landfill has been the dominating waste handling – Before the end of 2012, all federal states in Brazil should present “State plans on Solid waste” and all municipalities should present a corresponding “Municipal Plans on Integrated Management on Solid Waste”. Resource efficiency ambitions with regards to waste management Waste streams – Total amount of municipal solid waste i (”RSU”): 373 kg/capita/year – Total amount to Landfill
- 38. Transport Pretreatment Material recovery Post treatment andhandling of hazardous waste Sorting Energy recovery Collection Prevention Minimisation Technology and infrastructure in some Brazilian regions Status and investments plans Landfill
- 39.
- 40. Important areas forinnovation Policy and regulations – Interventions Resources and markets – Interventions Knowledge development and entrepreneurial experimentation – R&D results, demonstration projects, creation of new business Creation of legitimacy – Industry organisations, lobby organisations, non- profit organisations, NGO, etc.
- 41. Policy and regulations 1.Do you have formal policy regarding waste management? 2. Does the articulated vision fit in the existing legislation? 3. Does the policy drive towards Zerowaste? 4. Is it supported by specific programs? Is the objective inducing government activities? What are the technological expectations (negative/positive)? 1 2 3 4 Disagree Agree
- 42. Resources 1. Are theresufficient financial resources for change? 2. Are there sufficent human resources? 3. Do they correspond with system needs? 4. Is there adequate public funding? Is there sufficient risk capital? Do they correspond with the system’s needs? Can companies easily access the resources? 1 2 3 4 Disagree Agree
- 43. Markets 1. Do youhave Market for recycled/reused products? 2. Does the public take the lead? 3. Are there fiscal insentives? What is its size (niche/developed)? Who are the users (current and potential)? Must a new market be created or an existing one be opened up 1 2 3 Disagree Agree
- 44. Knowledge development anddissimination 1. Do you have high quality in the knowledge base 2. Does waste management receive attention in national and regional research and technology programmes? 3. Which actors are particularly active and do they communicate? Are there many projects, research, patents and articles? Is the knowledge basic or applied? Is there a leading international position, trigger programmes, many cited patents? Who finances the knowledge development? Are there enough knowledge users? 1 2 3 Disagree Agree
- 45. Entrepreneurial experimentation 1. Arethere enough entrepreneurs? 2. To what extent do entrepreneurs experiment? What are the products/services What is the quality of entrepreneurship? What types of businesses are involved? What variety of technological options are available? Are any entrepreneurs leaving the system? Are there new entrepreneurs? 1 2 Disagree Agree
- 46. Creation of legitimacy 1.Is investment in waste management seen as a legitimate decision? 2. Is there much resistance to change? Where is resistance coming from? How does this resistance manifest itself? What is the lobbying power of the actors in the system? Is coalition forming occurring? 1 2 Disagree Agree
- 47.
- 48. Broadening strategy workby adding more perspectives to an integrated approach! Recycling (energy recovery) Reuse Minimisation Technology/ Waste chain Processes Business models Organisation Institutions Zero Waste Prevention Modification Redesign CreationAlternatives Landfill/disposal Source: OECD, adapted
- 49.
- 50. List innovative waste managementvideos Techreturns/closing the loop: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJGWk_bBq0U Concept to refurbish and reuse old cellphones and recycle them at the real end of life. AEB video with subtitles (12 min): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubyzbNFO9Oo , Short version on different streams: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdfCnEDQuK0 Plastic mapping: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35e5HqBTDEE Plastic whale: (dutch) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kyy- voYWtno Visit statesecretary to Sims Recycling solutions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCrQPsgKROE#t=92 E-waste race (awareness campaign while collecting E-waste) http://ewasterace.nl/video (however video is in Dutch) Here a link to one more video from Amsterdam district East: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qajoH0MOkcMhttps://www.yo utube.com/watch?v=qajoH0MOkcM
- 51. List innovative waste managementvideos Link to the MRWA YouTube channel. There you will find a range of films and animation about waste management on Merseyside(Get It Sorted + time lapse build of our Gillmoss MRF, recycling , re-use of textiles (East Meets West/My T-Shirt) and Love Food Hate Waste. You can use any of these for the project visits: http://www.youtube.com/user/MerseysideWDA Link to the Bulky Bob’s film you saw on their You Tube channel as well: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cr5x39VL2P g
Editor's Notes
- #6 The SP Group comprises nine technical units and six subsidiaries. We have a presence throughout Sweden with around 600 people in Borås, where our head office and a large number of our laboratories are located. We have around 200 people in Stockholm, mainly at YKI, CBI and Sp Trä, but other parts of the Group also have staff working in Stockholm. There are around 150 staff in Gothenburg at companies such as SIK, SP Energiteknik and SP Bygg och Mekanik. We have a presence in Uppsala (JTI, SMP), Skellefteå (SP Trä), Växjö (Glafo, SP) and in Skåne, mainly Lund, where we are now making additional investments in wider establishment.
- #7 We are involved in the entire innovation chain, from research to development and evaluation, right the way through to market. Major organisational expertise and the experience to make the most of research results. SP's technical scope is unique and means that we can take on complex projects and issues requiring both scope and depth.
- #8 Sp is coordinator for and working together with…
- #10 Different regions with different conditions but all have the same goal
- #13 Här tar vi upp vart vill vi komma och hur vi kan komma dit. Genom samarbete på alla nivåer. Ge exempel. It means a systematic approach to cross-sector collaboration internally and externally, involvement and influence on institutions ie government agencies, laws, standards, etc. structural changes in organizations in both municipalities and companies business models that integrate sustainability parameters: economy, ecology and social adjustment, and thus create value outside the economic framework Processes that overlap, parallel, and do not follow each other and function as watertight bulkheads A well analyzed and residential area that shows what the needs are and how many different ways these can be solved.
- #21 The actors have been categorized into five categories. The table presents the main actors who have been highlighted most of the regions in each category.
- #23 Regional Spider Charts
- #25 Anna tar hand om detta
- #31 This section could take up a whole session but we should just hi-light a couple of points that came out of the analysis. Do we build on strengths focus on opportunities, address our weakness or try to defuse the threats.
- #49 Och vad sa SWOT när det gällde avfallsprevention? Saknas incitament för att jobba avfallsförebyggande, möjligt legitimitet – stort allmänintresse Fokuserar vi för mycket på källsortering – glömmer bort det viktiga avfallsförebyggande arbetet
- #51 Att jobba avfallsförebyggande är ju huvudmålet – både om vi ser till de nationella miljömålen, nationella avfallsplanen och kommunernas egna planer (..även kommunernas branschorganisation Avfall Sverige satsar ju stort inom detta område). Measures aimed at reducing food waste generation by 30 % by 2025 Recycling and preparing for re-use of municipal waste to be increased to 70 % by 2030
- #52 Något som har varit svårt och som vi därför identifierat som en utmaning i projektet är hur kommunen kan arbeta för att förebygga avfall! How can the city with its own facilities and organisations (schools, administrations etc.) set a good example? By comparing different levels of ambition of the city council regarding waste prevention measures we want to evaluate the benefits of a focus on waste prevention that permeates the whole organisation. Can the city be an engine for creating innovations to prevent waste?
- #54 Två grupper av alternativ
- #57 För båda grupperna ligger det ett
- #60 Ska behåller några bilder bara annars bara Sietses video
- #81 Svaren blir olika om man fokuserar på prevention eller ny teknologi. Var tydlig
- #87 Här tar vi upp vart vill vi komma och hur vi kan komma dit. Genom samarbete på alla nivåer. Ge exempel. It means a systematic approach to cross-sector collaboration internally and externally, involvement and influence on institutions ie government agencies, laws, standards, etc. structural changes in organizations in both municipalities and companies business models that integrate sustainability parameters: economy, ecology and social adjustment, and thus create value outside the economic framework Processes that overlap, parallel, and do not follow each other and function as watertight bulkheads A well analyzed and residential area that shows what the needs are and how many different ways these can be solved.