Warning
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•901 views
The document contains a trigger warning for the presentation, noting that some content or elements may upset some audience members. It advises anyone who finds such warnings distressing or feels unable to cope with techniques like empathy, diversity of viewpoints, or differing experiences to leave and find a safe place to avoid such experiences.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
UKSG Conference 2016 Breakout Session - Discovery and linking integrity – do ...
UKSG Conference 2016 Breakout Session - Discovery and linking integrity – do ...UKSG: connecting the knowledge community
How serendipitous is discovery for users? Like many a teenager, OpenURL linking can behave inappropriately. What can we do to smooth out the bumps on the road and what other tools are available? This breakout session will walk swiftly through linking to discovery targets, from OpenURL 0.1/1.0, to Index-Enhanced Direct Linking, Link 2.0 and beyond …UKSG webinar: Making scholarly communication great again. Do institutional re...
UKSG webinar: Making scholarly communication great again. Do institutional re...UKSG: connecting the knowledge community
It is not new to say that the scholarly communication system is sick. One way to put it is that the publishers have built a paywall around the papers written by our faculty and make us librarians pay for it.
For years, Open Access via the green and gold route have been touted as a joint solution. To this end, as academic librarians, we focused on building institutional repositories and getting open access mandates. However, recently, many prominent members of the open access community have begun to express doubts about the viability of institutional repositories as a solution given the lack of success.
Some, like Stevan Harnad self-dubbed “Open Access Archivangelist” for Green Open access, claim to have given up, while others, like Eric Van de Velde, suggest that we rethink other ways to accomplish Green Open access beyond just institutional repositories. In this webinar, we will summarise all the arguments and attempt to give a librarian’s point of view about the future of IRs.Sustainable Futures for Research Communication
Slides for a talk given at Duke University on 7 October 2016. The talk focusses on political economics of scholarly publishing and routes forward to finding equitable and affordable ways to shift to Open Access.
OA Advocacy Today
Talk given to the OASPA Conference in Riga in 2013. Discusses adoption patterns and communities and modes of advocacy.
Open Knowledge Institutions: Is there a future for the university in a networ...
Public and static slides for a presentation on Open Knowledge Institutions at Exeter University Egenis Centre on 13 January 2020
Research Excellence is a Neo-Colonial Agenda
Talk given at the On Think Tanks meeting in Geneva in February 2019. Discusses the way in which research excellence is constructed and tends to 'internationalise' networks. Using the Sabato-Botana triangle as a model it argues for the importance of localism and the need for contextualised conceptions of excellence if research is to deliver value for the communities that support it.
Network Enabled Research: Connectivity, groups and growth in the production o...
We often talk about “research networks” for projects. Our measures of research quality are often based on networks of citations. Social media networks are increasingly important in internal and external communications of research. Usually we think about these things as external technologies that have affected how we do things. Social technologies of funding intended to drive collaboration, data collection technologies that let us think about not just one link between articles but the characteristics of the whole system, communications technologies with new possibilities. But to think of these as external effects is to miss the fact that the networks have always been there. What has changed is their density and interconnection. We can actually turn the question around. Rather than ask what impact social media networks have had on research, we should ask what changes were occurring that required something like social media to be developed? For science to continue growing, it needs more complex and larger networks to be formed. What are the characteristics of systems that support that? How do we design scholarship as networks so that it can continue to grow?
Recommended
UKSG Conference 2016 Breakout Session - Discovery and linking integrity – do ...
UKSG Conference 2016 Breakout Session - Discovery and linking integrity – do ...UKSG: connecting the knowledge community
How serendipitous is discovery for users? Like many a teenager, OpenURL linking can behave inappropriately. What can we do to smooth out the bumps on the road and what other tools are available? This breakout session will walk swiftly through linking to discovery targets, from OpenURL 0.1/1.0, to Index-Enhanced Direct Linking, Link 2.0 and beyond …UKSG webinar: Making scholarly communication great again. Do institutional re...
UKSG webinar: Making scholarly communication great again. Do institutional re...UKSG: connecting the knowledge community
It is not new to say that the scholarly communication system is sick. One way to put it is that the publishers have built a paywall around the papers written by our faculty and make us librarians pay for it.
For years, Open Access via the green and gold route have been touted as a joint solution. To this end, as academic librarians, we focused on building institutional repositories and getting open access mandates. However, recently, many prominent members of the open access community have begun to express doubts about the viability of institutional repositories as a solution given the lack of success.
Some, like Stevan Harnad self-dubbed “Open Access Archivangelist” for Green Open access, claim to have given up, while others, like Eric Van de Velde, suggest that we rethink other ways to accomplish Green Open access beyond just institutional repositories. In this webinar, we will summarise all the arguments and attempt to give a librarian’s point of view about the future of IRs.Sustainable Futures for Research Communication
Slides for a talk given at Duke University on 7 October 2016. The talk focusses on political economics of scholarly publishing and routes forward to finding equitable and affordable ways to shift to Open Access.
OA Advocacy Today
Talk given to the OASPA Conference in Riga in 2013. Discusses adoption patterns and communities and modes of advocacy.
Open Knowledge Institutions: Is there a future for the university in a networ...
Public and static slides for a presentation on Open Knowledge Institutions at Exeter University Egenis Centre on 13 January 2020
Research Excellence is a Neo-Colonial Agenda
Talk given at the On Think Tanks meeting in Geneva in February 2019. Discusses the way in which research excellence is constructed and tends to 'internationalise' networks. Using the Sabato-Botana triangle as a model it argues for the importance of localism and the need for contextualised conceptions of excellence if research is to deliver value for the communities that support it.
Network Enabled Research: Connectivity, groups and growth in the production o...
We often talk about “research networks” for projects. Our measures of research quality are often based on networks of citations. Social media networks are increasingly important in internal and external communications of research. Usually we think about these things as external technologies that have affected how we do things. Social technologies of funding intended to drive collaboration, data collection technologies that let us think about not just one link between articles but the characteristics of the whole system, communications technologies with new possibilities. But to think of these as external effects is to miss the fact that the networks have always been there. What has changed is their density and interconnection. We can actually turn the question around. Rather than ask what impact social media networks have had on research, we should ask what changes were occurring that required something like social media to be developed? For science to continue growing, it needs more complex and larger networks to be formed. What are the characteristics of systems that support that? How do we design scholarship as networks so that it can continue to grow?
Excellence is a neo-colonial agenda...and what we can do about
Slides from a keynote at the meeting 'Perspectives of Research Excellence in the Global South' - argues that considering research excellence as a neo-colonial agenda helps to defuse the dangers that a North Atlantic attitude to 'biblio-excellence' creates but also offers opportunities for developing and transitional countries to take a leadership role on the future of research policy
The Power of Infrastructures and the Infrastructures of Power
Talk given at the CASRAI 2015 meeting in Toronto on the Principles for Scholarly Infrastructures
Will we still know ourselves? Identity and Community in a Transforming Knowle...
Keynote given at the NFAIS 2018 meeting in Alexandria, Virginia, USA on 28 February 2018
The world of information is transforming at a bewildering pace. The assumptions of yesterday, the stable institutions and cherished practices increasingly seem to be vanishing before our eyes. The first assumption of any new strategy seems to be “what would this look like if we built it from scratch, today”. And yet continuity matters, we don’t build new tools, institutions and practices from scratch, they evolve in a messy and contingent way from what we have available to us in the moment.
In this talk, Neylon unpicks the underlying drivers of change, and how they are coupled to a long history of how we manage information. Neylon will discuss how the different perspectives of important groups—scholars, publishers, funders, platform providers and the myriad of information professionals—lead to a partial focus that can make us simultaneously fearful of the change we see and blind to the shifts that actually matter.
If the arc of history bends towards justice then it follows that the arc of our knowledge and information environment necessarily bends towards greater scale and greater diversity. At the same time it is the values that underpin scholarship and the various ways in which we identify with the project of building knowledge, that drive us forward. If we are to take advantage of change, we need to understand what it is that must stay the same.
Beyond Open: Culture and Scaling in the Making of Knowledge
Open Access, Open Science, Open Government, Open Education. We often see these as new movements, set against an old world of broken – and closed – systems of scholarship and education. New technologies, primarily the web, have lifted the veil from our eyes to let us see this new world. If only we could build the right technology...mandate the right behavior then a new utopia of open scholarship will be upon us! The problem with this view is that it sees the disruption of the web as a one-off event that once worked through will provide a solution for all time. Framed that way this is obviously not true, but the challenge goes deeper than that. Scholarship, in its western institutionalized forms, has increased in scale continuously for at least 400 and possibly 2000 years. No social or institutional system can scale continuously over several order of magnitude. Therefore we must expect structural historical breaks.
The question is not how to fix scholarship, but how on earth it has managed to last this long? I will argue that what sits at the core of this survival is a set of normative cultural values that privilege openness. Their application has been far from perfect but the concepts of communication, criticism, civility and inclusion have deep roots in our institutions and communities. At the same time community and identity are critical to scholarship, and both of these imply exclusion and boundary work to define community. My argument is that the culture, forms and values of western scholarship have held these two tendencies in productive tension, allowing the academy to address the ongoing scaling (and consequent inclusion) problem through social, technical and economic innovation. Our challenge is not simply to solve today's problems, but to re-imagine our institutions so that they continuously generate and are able to adopt the innovations necessary to continue to solve the scaling problem into the indefinite future.
Excellence is Bullshit
One variant of the "Excellence is Bullshit" talk about evaluation, rankings etc. Builds on "Excellence R Us" Moore et al Palgrave Communications, 2017
From Cycles to Networks
Slides for a presentation to the SCONUL conference in 2015. Focusses on the idea that there is an ongoing shift from working within life cycles to networks in the research world
Where next for Open Scholarship?
Slides for a talk given at the Centro Cultural de la Ciencia in Buenos Aires on 4 September 2017. The opportunities and challenges for open research practices become more complex as those practices become common. Is open research just “good research” or is it a fundamental change in our approach? I will argue that seeing open research in oppositional terms is not productive, and that thinking of it as an ongoing process of opening up practice that has been ongoing for centuries may make implementation and adoptions easier and more rapid.
Openness in Scholarship: A return to core values?
The debate over the meaning, and value, of open movements has intensified. The fear of co-option of various efforts from Open Access to Open Data is driving a reassessment and re-definition of what is intended by “open”. In this article I apply group level models from cultural studies and economics to argue that the tension between exclusionary group formation and identity and aspirations towards inclusion and openness are a natural part of knowledge- making. Situating the traditional Western Scientific Knowledge System as a culture-made group, I argue that the institutional forms that support the group act as economic underwriters for the process by which groups creating exclusive knowledge invest in the process of making it more accessible, less exclusive, and more public-good-like, in exchange for receiving excludable goods that sustain the group. A necessary consequence of this is that our institutions will be conservative in their assessment of what knowledge-goods are worth of consideration and who is allowed within those institutional systems. Nonetheless the inclusion of new perspectives and increasing diversity underpins the production of general knowledge. I suggest that instead of positioning openness as new, and in opposition to traditional closed systems, it may be more productive to adopt a narrative in which efforts to increase inclusion are seen as a very old, core value of the academy, albeit one that is a constant work in progress.
Interpreting Shadows on the Elephant in the Room
Talk on the economics of sustainability models for scholarly communication given at ScienceEurope/LIBER workshop in Antwerp on 27 April 2017. Focuses on very fundamental issues of what happens in economic terms with scholarly communication and how cultural institutuions as well as formal institutions play a key role in supporting groups, clubs in economic terms, that take knowledge and covert to being more public like.
Sustaining Scholarly Infrastructures through Collective Action: The lessons t...
Talk given at OECD workshop on sustaining scholarly data infrastructures
Investing in Scholarly Futures
How can we invest in future development of scholarly communications. Whose role is it and who is paying? In this talk, given at the UKSG meeting in 2016 I use the lens of culture to ask how scholarly communications needs to change, and where the opportunities lie for researchers and publishers.
Excellence, Innovation, Evaluation: Collaboration x Innovation
Slides for my talk at Calsberg #cix working in Copenhagen on 30 June 2015. Covers evaluation and questions of identifying "excellence"
No stories without evidence, no evidence without stories
Talk given at Sydney University on 4 August 2015.
Across many parts of our lives we are faced with the increasing availability of data to support decision making. With every element of the research process moving online, there are many new sources of data, as well as improved old sources of data, that can provide information on the performance, value and use of research and researchers.
But there is a problem. The proliferation of proxy data, and their naive equation with such weakly defined concepts as “quality” and “excellence”, have lead to a reliance on rankings and quantitative measures as institutional targets. More than this the adoption of these instrumental targets has lead us away from a critical discussion of institutional values, indeed of what the institution is for.
I will argue that it is only by moving away from such vague terms as “quality”, “excellence” and “impact” and focussing on institutional values and a well articulated mission that institutions of scholarship will continue to be relevant for the future. It is through interrogating the goals of the institution that the enormous potential resource of data on the research enterprise can be realised. Using the data effectively will allow us a window on how knowledge actually moves and is used. In combination with a clear sense of institutional goals this provides great opportunities for institutions to differentiate themselves from the pack.
From research life cycle to networks: The role of the library
Google for "research life cycle" and you'll find a million images. Everyone has their own cycle, not all of them compatible. In this talk I argue that we need to move from a cycle conception of research information flows towards one based on networks. The library has the skills and values to act as a professional guide to this terriroty.
CENDI - Impact
Talk given to the CENDI group in May 2015. Discusses impact, mission and the effective use of the rich data available on the use of research.
Project Credit - Overview and Summary
Slides for a summary to the Project Credit Workshop held in Washington DC on 10 December 2014.
Real Choices, False Colors
Clearer with the notes available from the notes tab below.
From a talk given at Harvard on 2 October 2014 discussing the choices needed for developing new scholarly communication platforms. The talk focusses on the institution perspective, seeing preservation and dissemination as a core part of the institutional mission. It discusses how the artificial divide between repositories and publishing as routes to wider access are disguising the real questions on resource allocation and preparation for the future
Managing a (different) Data Deluge - SPARC OA conference
Presentation from the Implementation Panel of the SPARC OA conference in Kansas City.
The talk discusses the challenges that arise when Open Access publishing rises to be a majority of scholarly publishing. Different systems are required to manage payments, metadata transfer and funder compliance for institutions, researchers, funders and publishers.
Network Enabled Research - The role of open source and open thinking
Keynote talk given at the Bioinformatics Open Source Conference at the ISMB in Berlin on 19 July 2013. Discussed from the perspective of Open Source and open definitions how to think about networks and the potential for discontinuities and phase transitions as places where the expansion of networks can lead to significant changes in scientific capacity.
Research Assessment to Support Research Impact
A talk given at the SCAP Symposium on August 12 2012. The talk focuses on the question of how new tools for tracking the use and re-use of research provide new mechanisms by which we can demonstrate and investigate research impact with a particular focus on those papers published from the University of Cape Town with PLOS.
Modern Database Management 12th Global Edition by Hoffer solution manual.docx
https://qidiantiku.com/solution-manual-for-modern-database-management-12th-global-edition-by-hoffer.shtml
name：Solution manual for Modern Database Management 12th Global Edition by Hoffer
Edition：12th Global Edition
author：by Hoffer
ISBN：ISBN 10: 0133544613 / ISBN 13: 9780133544619
type：solution manual
format：word/zip
All chapter include
Focusing on what leading database practitioners say are the most important aspects to database development, Modern Database Management presents sound pedagogy, and topics that are critical for the practical success of database professionals. The 12th Edition further facilitates learning with illustrations that clarify important concepts and new media resources that make some of the more challenging material more engaging. Also included are general updates and expanded material in the areas undergoing rapid change due to improved managerial practices, database design tools and methodologies, and database technology.
More Related Content
More from Cameron Neylon
Excellence is a neo-colonial agenda...and what we can do about
Slides from a keynote at the meeting 'Perspectives of Research Excellence in the Global South' - argues that considering research excellence as a neo-colonial agenda helps to defuse the dangers that a North Atlantic attitude to 'biblio-excellence' creates but also offers opportunities for developing and transitional countries to take a leadership role on the future of research policy
The Power of Infrastructures and the Infrastructures of Power
Talk given at the CASRAI 2015 meeting in Toronto on the Principles for Scholarly Infrastructures
Will we still know ourselves? Identity and Community in a Transforming Knowle...
Keynote given at the NFAIS 2018 meeting in Alexandria, Virginia, USA on 28 February 2018
The world of information is transforming at a bewildering pace. The assumptions of yesterday, the stable institutions and cherished practices increasingly seem to be vanishing before our eyes. The first assumption of any new strategy seems to be “what would this look like if we built it from scratch, today”. And yet continuity matters, we don’t build new tools, institutions and practices from scratch, they evolve in a messy and contingent way from what we have available to us in the moment.
In this talk, Neylon unpicks the underlying drivers of change, and how they are coupled to a long history of how we manage information. Neylon will discuss how the different perspectives of important groups—scholars, publishers, funders, platform providers and the myriad of information professionals—lead to a partial focus that can make us simultaneously fearful of the change we see and blind to the shifts that actually matter.
If the arc of history bends towards justice then it follows that the arc of our knowledge and information environment necessarily bends towards greater scale and greater diversity. At the same time it is the values that underpin scholarship and the various ways in which we identify with the project of building knowledge, that drive us forward. If we are to take advantage of change, we need to understand what it is that must stay the same.
Beyond Open: Culture and Scaling in the Making of Knowledge
Open Access, Open Science, Open Government, Open Education. We often see these as new movements, set against an old world of broken – and closed – systems of scholarship and education. New technologies, primarily the web, have lifted the veil from our eyes to let us see this new world. If only we could build the right technology...mandate the right behavior then a new utopia of open scholarship will be upon us! The problem with this view is that it sees the disruption of the web as a one-off event that once worked through will provide a solution for all time. Framed that way this is obviously not true, but the challenge goes deeper than that. Scholarship, in its western institutionalized forms, has increased in scale continuously for at least 400 and possibly 2000 years. No social or institutional system can scale continuously over several order of magnitude. Therefore we must expect structural historical breaks.
The question is not how to fix scholarship, but how on earth it has managed to last this long? I will argue that what sits at the core of this survival is a set of normative cultural values that privilege openness. Their application has been far from perfect but the concepts of communication, criticism, civility and inclusion have deep roots in our institutions and communities. At the same time community and identity are critical to scholarship, and both of these imply exclusion and boundary work to define community. My argument is that the culture, forms and values of western scholarship have held these two tendencies in productive tension, allowing the academy to address the ongoing scaling (and consequent inclusion) problem through social, technical and economic innovation. Our challenge is not simply to solve today's problems, but to re-imagine our institutions so that they continuously generate and are able to adopt the innovations necessary to continue to solve the scaling problem into the indefinite future.
Excellence is Bullshit
One variant of the "Excellence is Bullshit" talk about evaluation, rankings etc. Builds on "Excellence R Us" Moore et al Palgrave Communications, 2017
From Cycles to Networks
Slides for a presentation to the SCONUL conference in 2015. Focusses on the idea that there is an ongoing shift from working within life cycles to networks in the research world
Where next for Open Scholarship?
Slides for a talk given at the Centro Cultural de la Ciencia in Buenos Aires on 4 September 2017. The opportunities and challenges for open research practices become more complex as those practices become common. Is open research just “good research” or is it a fundamental change in our approach? I will argue that seeing open research in oppositional terms is not productive, and that thinking of it as an ongoing process of opening up practice that has been ongoing for centuries may make implementation and adoptions easier and more rapid.
Openness in Scholarship: A return to core values?
The debate over the meaning, and value, of open movements has intensified. The fear of co-option of various efforts from Open Access to Open Data is driving a reassessment and re-definition of what is intended by “open”. In this article I apply group level models from cultural studies and economics to argue that the tension between exclusionary group formation and identity and aspirations towards inclusion and openness are a natural part of knowledge- making. Situating the traditional Western Scientific Knowledge System as a culture-made group, I argue that the institutional forms that support the group act as economic underwriters for the process by which groups creating exclusive knowledge invest in the process of making it more accessible, less exclusive, and more public-good-like, in exchange for receiving excludable goods that sustain the group. A necessary consequence of this is that our institutions will be conservative in their assessment of what knowledge-goods are worth of consideration and who is allowed within those institutional systems. Nonetheless the inclusion of new perspectives and increasing diversity underpins the production of general knowledge. I suggest that instead of positioning openness as new, and in opposition to traditional closed systems, it may be more productive to adopt a narrative in which efforts to increase inclusion are seen as a very old, core value of the academy, albeit one that is a constant work in progress.
Interpreting Shadows on the Elephant in the Room
Talk on the economics of sustainability models for scholarly communication given at ScienceEurope/LIBER workshop in Antwerp on 27 April 2017. Focuses on very fundamental issues of what happens in economic terms with scholarly communication and how cultural institutuions as well as formal institutions play a key role in supporting groups, clubs in economic terms, that take knowledge and covert to being more public like.
Sustaining Scholarly Infrastructures through Collective Action: The lessons t...
Talk given at OECD workshop on sustaining scholarly data infrastructures
Investing in Scholarly Futures
How can we invest in future development of scholarly communications. Whose role is it and who is paying? In this talk, given at the UKSG meeting in 2016 I use the lens of culture to ask how scholarly communications needs to change, and where the opportunities lie for researchers and publishers.
Excellence, Innovation, Evaluation: Collaboration x Innovation
Slides for my talk at Calsberg #cix working in Copenhagen on 30 June 2015. Covers evaluation and questions of identifying "excellence"
No stories without evidence, no evidence without stories
Talk given at Sydney University on 4 August 2015.
Across many parts of our lives we are faced with the increasing availability of data to support decision making. With every element of the research process moving online, there are many new sources of data, as well as improved old sources of data, that can provide information on the performance, value and use of research and researchers.
But there is a problem. The proliferation of proxy data, and their naive equation with such weakly defined concepts as “quality” and “excellence”, have lead to a reliance on rankings and quantitative measures as institutional targets. More than this the adoption of these instrumental targets has lead us away from a critical discussion of institutional values, indeed of what the institution is for.
I will argue that it is only by moving away from such vague terms as “quality”, “excellence” and “impact” and focussing on institutional values and a well articulated mission that institutions of scholarship will continue to be relevant for the future. It is through interrogating the goals of the institution that the enormous potential resource of data on the research enterprise can be realised. Using the data effectively will allow us a window on how knowledge actually moves and is used. In combination with a clear sense of institutional goals this provides great opportunities for institutions to differentiate themselves from the pack.
From research life cycle to networks: The role of the library
Google for "research life cycle" and you'll find a million images. Everyone has their own cycle, not all of them compatible. In this talk I argue that we need to move from a cycle conception of research information flows towards one based on networks. The library has the skills and values to act as a professional guide to this terriroty.
CENDI - Impact
Talk given to the CENDI group in May 2015. Discusses impact, mission and the effective use of the rich data available on the use of research.
Project Credit - Overview and Summary
Slides for a summary to the Project Credit Workshop held in Washington DC on 10 December 2014.
Real Choices, False Colors
Clearer with the notes available from the notes tab below.
From a talk given at Harvard on 2 October 2014 discussing the choices needed for developing new scholarly communication platforms. The talk focusses on the institution perspective, seeing preservation and dissemination as a core part of the institutional mission. It discusses how the artificial divide between repositories and publishing as routes to wider access are disguising the real questions on resource allocation and preparation for the future
Managing a (different) Data Deluge - SPARC OA conference
Presentation from the Implementation Panel of the SPARC OA conference in Kansas City.
The talk discusses the challenges that arise when Open Access publishing rises to be a majority of scholarly publishing. Different systems are required to manage payments, metadata transfer and funder compliance for institutions, researchers, funders and publishers.
Network Enabled Research - The role of open source and open thinking
Keynote talk given at the Bioinformatics Open Source Conference at the ISMB in Berlin on 19 July 2013. Discussed from the perspective of Open Source and open definitions how to think about networks and the potential for discontinuities and phase transitions as places where the expansion of networks can lead to significant changes in scientific capacity.
Research Assessment to Support Research Impact
A talk given at the SCAP Symposium on August 12 2012. The talk focuses on the question of how new tools for tracking the use and re-use of research provide new mechanisms by which we can demonstrate and investigate research impact with a particular focus on those papers published from the University of Cape Town with PLOS.
More from Cameron Neylon (20)
Excellence is a neo-colonial agenda...and what we can do about
Excellence is a neo-colonial agenda...and what we can do about
The Power of Infrastructures and the Infrastructures of Power
The Power of Infrastructures and the Infrastructures of Power
Will we still know ourselves? Identity and Community in a Transforming Knowle...
Will we still know ourselves? Identity and Community in a Transforming Knowle...
Beyond Open: Culture and Scaling in the Making of Knowledge
Beyond Open: Culture and Scaling in the Making of Knowledge
Sustaining Scholarly Infrastructures through Collective Action: The lessons t...
Sustaining Scholarly Infrastructures through Collective Action: The lessons t...
Excellence, Innovation, Evaluation: Collaboration x Innovation
Excellence, Innovation, Evaluation: Collaboration x Innovation
No stories without evidence, no evidence without stories
No stories without evidence, no evidence without stories
From research life cycle to networks: The role of the library
From research life cycle to networks: The role of the library
Managing a (different) Data Deluge - SPARC OA conference
Managing a (different) Data Deluge - SPARC OA conference
Network Enabled Research - The role of open source and open thinking
Network Enabled Research - The role of open source and open thinking
Recently uploaded
Modern Database Management 12th Global Edition by Hoffer solution manual.docx
https://qidiantiku.com/solution-manual-for-modern-database-management-12th-global-edition-by-hoffer.shtml
name：Solution manual for Modern Database Management 12th Global Edition by Hoffer
Edition：12th Global Edition
author：by Hoffer
ISBN：ISBN 10: 0133544613 / ISBN 13: 9780133544619
type：solution manual
format：word/zip
All chapter include
Focusing on what leading database practitioners say are the most important aspects to database development, Modern Database Management presents sound pedagogy, and topics that are critical for the practical success of database professionals. The 12th Edition further facilitates learning with illustrations that clarify important concepts and new media resources that make some of the more challenging material more engaging. Also included are general updates and expanded material in the areas undergoing rapid change due to improved managerial practices, database design tools and methodologies, and database technology.
一比一原版杜克大学毕业证(Duke毕业证)成绩单留信认证
毕业原版【微信:41543339】【杜克大学毕业证(Duke毕业证)】【微信:41543339】成绩单、外壳、offer、留信学历认证（永久存档真实可查）采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【我们承诺采用的是学校原版纸张（纸质、底色、纹路），我们拥有全套进口原装设备，特殊工艺都是采用不同机器制作，仿真度基本可以达到100%，所有工艺效果都可提前给客户展示，不满意可以根据客户要求进行调整，直到满意为止！】
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信41543339】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信41543339】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
留信网服务项目：
1、留学生专业人才库服务（留信分析）
2、国（境）学习人员提供就业推荐信服务
3、留学人员区块链存储服务
→ 【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）】
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
选择实体注册公司办理，更放心，更安全！我们的承诺：客户在留信官方认证查询网站查询到认证通过结果后付款，不成功不收费！
Founder-Game Director Workshop (Session 1)
A workshop about video game directors who are also studio founders.
TCS AI for Business Study – Key Findings
Artificial intelligence (AI) offers new opportunities to radically reinvent the way we do business. This study explores how CEOs and top decision makers around the world are responding to the transformative potential of AI.
SOCIO-ANTHROPOLOGY FACULTY OF NURSING.....
Deals with people living and how they are taken care of bu health care workers
Oprah Winfrey: A Leader in Media, Philanthropy, and Empowerment | CIO Women M...
This person is none other than Oprah Winfrey, a highly influential figure whose impact extends beyond television. This article will delve into the remarkable life and lasting legacy of Oprah. Her story serves as a reminder of the importance of perseverance, compassion, and firm determination.
W.H.Bender Quote 65 - The Team Member and Guest Experience
The Team Member and Guest Experience - Lead and Take Care of your restaurant team. They are the people closest to and delivering Hospitality to your paying Guests!
Make the call, and we can assist you.
408-784-7371
Foodservice Consulting + Design
Recently uploaded (9)
Modern Database Management 12th Global Edition by Hoffer solution manual.docx
Modern Database Management 12th Global Edition by Hoffer solution manual.docx
Leadership Ethics and Change, Purpose to Impact Plan
Leadership Ethics and Change, Purpose to Impact Plan
Oprah Winfrey: A Leader in Media, Philanthropy, and Empowerment | CIO Women M...
Oprah Winfrey: A Leader in Media, Philanthropy, and Empowerment | CIO Women M...
W.H.Bender Quote 65 - The Team Member and Guest Experience
W.H.Bender Quote 65 - The Team Member and Guest Experience
Warning
- 1. Trigger Warning This presentation may contain warnings about content or elements that some audience members may find upsetting. If you find such warnings distressing or threatening or if you are unable to cope with a presenter seeking to support their argument through techniques such as displaying empathy, reflecting on a diversity of view points, or engaging with differing experiences then you may wish to leave the presentation and find a ”safe place” where you will be able to avoid such experiences.