This document discusses the important role of victim advocates in supporting victims throughout the legal process. It outlines the duties of victim advocates, including ensuring victims are informed of their rights and updates on their case. Victim advocates also provide emotional support, refer victims to counseling services, and help victims feel involved in the legal process. The document examines different aspects of the legal process that victim advocates are involved in, such as the role of law enforcement and prosecutors, victim impact statements, no-drop prosecution policies, and restorative justice programs. It emphasizes the importance of advocates communicating with and supporting victims, as crimes can have long-lasting psychological and emotional impacts.

1. VICTIM ADVOCATE 1
The Importance and Duties of a
Victim/Witness Advocate
By: Alejandro Colon
Written in May 2015

2. VICTIM ADVOCATE 2
When talking about victims and their right to know what is going on in the judicial
process, they should know everything. Over the years, law enforcement and prosecutors have
been working together to achieve this goal. It is hard to work toward a goal like this when there
is so much crime going on around us. Talking in more specific terms, the Springfield District
Court has one of the heaviest workloads of them all. People are constantly entering and
reentering the court system in the city of Springfield. The murder rate per 1,000 is 0.14 which is
more than three times higher than the rest of the United States at 0.04 (neighborhoodscout.com).
This makes Springfield safer than only 5% of the rest of the cities in the United States. Rape,
robbery, and assault are also way higher than the national average. This means there are more
victims in Springfield than there are in 95% of the rest of the cities in the United States. It is
important and necessary for the victims of these crime to be involved in the entire process.
Making sure they know if they have to be in court, if the defendant is released from jail, and if
there are any types of counseling or services they can take are some of the primary jobs of victim
advocates.
Law Enforcement Involvement
The judicial process starts with law enforcement. Police officers are the first to the scene
and they are the individuals who write the report about what happened. Parsons and Bergin
(2010) believe law enforcement should immediately address the needs of the victim including
emergency services, inform them of all their rights, explain the process for prosecuting a case,

3. VICTIM ADVOCATE 3
and make referrals to victim services. Maintaining a comfortable relationship with police officers
is the first step to recovery for the victims. A poor record of responding to victims’ needs,
especially in rape and domestic violence cases, can and has corroded the reputation of law
enforcement (Jordan, 2001, as cited in Parsons & Bergin, 2010). Police officers are faced with
several judgmental decisions every day. They choose what is important and what is to be left
alone. When it comes to violent crimes, it doesn’t matter what the scenario is, it should be
addressed effectively and correctly. Police officers’ decision to pursue or drop a case can be
influenced by factors such as the victim’s level of distress, their age, race, socioeconomic status,
and history with drugs and alcohol (Baldry, 1996; Brown, Hamilton & O’Neill, 2007; Campbell
& Raja, 1999; Frazier & Haney, 1996; Howerton, 2006; Rose & Randall, 1982, as cited in
Parson & Bergin, 2010). These factors should not matter because knowing how a person is really
feeling inside is impossible unless you talk to them or have another professional talk to them.
Using discretion in these situations tend to result in negative long-term opinions about law
enforcements as a whole, therefore it should no longer exist.
Prosecutor Involvement
Previous research shows that violent crimes are becoming more popular, but at the same
time, more sensitive to the public. The victim’s involvement in the criminal procedures was
scarce for a long time. Previous studies have shown that victims are often displeased with the
information they received from prosecutors on what to expect in court (Bennett, Goodman &
Dutton 1999; Frazier & Haney, 1996; Konradi, 1997, as cited in Parsons & Bergin, 2010).
Thanks to victims’ right advocates, efforts to give victims of violent crimes a voice within the
system has increased (Anderson, 2015). Goodrum (2013) claims that when she was first hired as
a prosecutor in the eighties, they didn’t spend a lot of time with the victims and their families.

4. VICTIM ADVOCATE 4
The focus was mainly on winning the case and not the emotional despair the families were going
through if it were a homicide case. Goodrum (2015) states that they are responsible for the case,
but the victims have rights and they have to make sure they are provided their rights. The victims
are just as involved with the case as the defendant and it is imperative that they feel this way. As
mentioned earlier, changes are being made to the system. The legal rights of victims of violent
and sexual assault crimes now include the right to be informed about the victims’ rights law, the
right to provide a victim witness impact statement, the right to have support of a victim advocate
during the interviews and trials, and the right to be informed about the final disposition of the
case (Anderson, 2015). Many times in court, the victim will be very upset about the situation. In
order to make them feel more involved in the process, we ask what they would like to see happen
with the verdict. Although this does not have an effect on the outcome, it is important for us as
advocate’s to forward this information to the prosecutor.
Impact Statement
The victim impact statement is a way for the victim to express how they really feel in
court. It gives them the opportunity to let all of their feelings out for the defendant, judge, jury,
and prosecutor to hear. They tell them how this experience has personally effected them
physically and emotionally. While this may seem like an extremely helpful and effective way to
get the victim’s point across, Erez, Roeger, and Morgan (1997) found no improvement in
victims’ satisfaction with the system following their participation in a victim impact statement.
Goodrum (2013) adds that victim impact statements may not give victims the type of
involvement they want. On the contrary, in one survey, a large majority of victims who were
informed of their right to submit an impact statement chose to do so in order to feeling like they
have a symbolic value (Kilpatrick, Beatty & Howley, 1998, as cited in Parsons & Bergin, 2010).

5. VICTIM ADVOCATE 5
Hirsch (2008), as cited in Goodrum (2013), believes receiving recognition and support from
government officials is the best way to bring order to their sense of self. This seems to be a more
effective way to help someone because people who are vulnerable need to feel that type of
comfort. When you are feeling alone, a simple one to two minute statement is not going to bring
a solution to that feeling. Victim impact statements have not been around for a while because
some believe it could tamper with the system. Barker, 2007; Erez & Rogers, 1999; Herman,
2005, as cited in Anderson 2015, claims the legal system has previously minimized the victims
power and choice within the criminal justice system due to fears that victims’ desires for
vengeance will compromise the neutrality of the system and the protection of defendant’s
constitutional rights. This is definitely something to consider when talking about presenting a
victim impact statement to the jury or the judge. People who ultimately make the decision on the
case can make a biased decision based on being sympathetic for the victim. This would throw off
the balance that the court system bases their principles off of. If the statement was done more
privately, maybe it could still have an impact. My experience with victim impact statements is it
works well in some cases but not all. There was a case where the defendant, who was a female,
physically assaulted another female because of an ex-boyfriend problems. The victim read her
impact statement and she expressed how the experience has hurt her physically and emotionally.
While she was reading this, I was peaking over at the defendant to see her reaction of what the
victim was saying. The defendant was very angry and had both fists balled up like she wanted to
assault her again. The defendant was found guilty and sentenced to 90 days in jail. Although she
was sentenced, the defendant is still going to have that rage built up inside of her when she’s
released and possibly retaliate. In another case, the victim impact statement was very helpful. It
was a domestic violence case where the defendant was a male and the victim was a female. She

6. VICTIM ADVOCATE 6
was extremely hurt by the situation because this was the first time it had ever happened and she
loved him dearly. She expressed that he needs to stop drinking because he turns into a different
person when he does. The victim’s impact statement brought the defendant to tears and it was
easy to tell that he regretted what he did. He was found guilty and sentenced to 90 days in jail
along with drug and alcohol classes. It was nice to see the victim explain herself and for the
defendant to understand why she felt that way. This was definitely a relationship that could be
rebuild into what it was before the incident.
No-Drop Prosecution
As a victim advocate, you see many cases where the person does not want to press
charges on the defendant for a number of reasons. One of these could be they are scared when
they get out of jail/prison, they will seek revenge against the victim and harm them once again.
This is a very common fear for a person to have whether they know them or not. In domestic
violence situations, the couple might get into a fight and the neighbors end up calling the police.
Whether it was a man hitting a woman, or a woman hitting a man, the person that hit their spouse
must be arrested and brought to jail. After this occurs, the case is out of the victims hands.
Nichols (2014) explains the no-drop policy requires state prosecution of any perpetrator of
domestic violence, regardless of the survivor’s desire to prosecute. In other words, the defendant
is now in the hands of the commonwealth and has to defend him or herself against the state.
Woman advocates feel that this is a great way to stop domestic violence. They believe it helps
women prosecute domestic violence as a public crime against the state, rather than the victim,
and send a message to society that opposes violence against women (Cassidy, 2006; Hanna,
1996, as cited by Nichols, 2014). This takes away the intimidation factor that was mentioned
earlier about the victim not wanting to press charges because they were scared of retaliation. This

7. VICTIM ADVOCATE 7
can also spark a problem because it is common for obsessive men or women to hold a grudge
against the person that sent them to jail, even though it wasn’t actually them that did it.
Kruttschnitt (2008) believes we are a long way from an agreement on the correct way of
addressing this problem. A study that Kruttschnitt (2008) talked about that was conducted by
Davis, O’Sullivan, Farole, and Rempel (2008) explains the difference between Bronx and
Brooklyn court systems. Brooklyn has a strict no-drop prosecution policy and about 99% of the
domestic violence arrests are filed with the court (Kruttschnitt, 2008). While the Bronx does not
have a policy and about 20% of domestic violence cases are filed with their court. While the two
boroughs are extremely different when it comes to their domestic violence policies, the findings
show that they isn’t a significant difference in the rearrest rates (Kruttschnitt, 2008). Dixon
(2008), as cited in Kruttschnitt (2008), explains:
“Victim safety, offender accountability, and specific deterrence take a back seat to
the issue of the increasing intrusion of crime-control measures into the lives of
“socially marginal” populations who, Dixon argues, need a much wider range of
social services than domestic violence courts and police can provide.”
She believes although the findings may show one thing, there are many other things that we need
to consider. She also believes there needs to be more domestic violence programs that are
available for those who need it.
Restorative Justice
Restorative justice gives the victim and the defendant an opportunity to talk under the
supervision of the court. The aims are to lessen the victim’s fear and tension toward the
defendant, for the victim to explain how the crime has affected them, for the offended to admit
his wrongdoing and apologize, and for the offended to possibly make up for what they did

8. VICTIM ADVOCATE 8
(Fawley and Daly, 2005). Parsons and Bergin (2010) believe restorative justice is possibly the
most widely researched alternative to adversarial court hearings. Restorative justice provides a
great opportunity for the victim to participate more in mediation and sentencing than the
traditional adversarial model because it allows them to confront the offender in a controlled
environment that is free from the court room (Umbreit, 1998, as cited in Parsons and Bergin,
2008). As for domestic violence cases, Astor (1991) as cited by Fawley and Daly (2005),
believes restorative justice is counterproductive. The reason for this is because she believes
restorative justice is a type of mediation, and to her, mediation in domestic violence cases does
not work. All it does is bring up the facts that the victim already knows, but presents it to a larger
crowd of people (Astor, 1991, as cited in Fawley and Daly, 2005). Restorative justice also occurs
when the victim is deceased because of the offender. This happens a lot when a mourning family
wants to talk to the person who killed their loved one. It helps with the grieving process because
the defendant can explain why it happened. Fawley and Daly (2005) believe it encourages a
more holistic understanding of the offense, rather than one confined to legal relevancies. Overall,
restorative justice gives the victim a better understanding of the legal process as a whole. The
main goal of this kind of mediation is to provide comfort to the victim and ensure them that they
are not the one to blame in the situation. It also helps the offender express their feelings which
might provide closure for the both of them.
Effects
Being a victim of any type of crime can have a huge impact on someone’s life. As a
victim advocate, you see victims of all types of crimes every single day. Therefore, it could be
common to not show sympathy to every victim because you have dealt with this type of crime
before. This is where you have to stay focused and keep in mind that this may be the victim’s

9. VICTIM ADVOCATE 9
first time experiencing something like this and making sure they are fine is the main priority.
This is important especially when the crime involves some sort of physical force being brought
upon the victim. Campbell and Raja (1999) as cited by Parson and Bergin (2010) believes that a
negative interaction with the legal system is a direct important predictor of post rape traumatic
stress symptoms. After completing an entire summer as an advocate, I learned that
communicating with the victim’s is the first step to their recovery. When something like a rape
or an assault occurs, the victim can feel lonely and possibly have self-esteem problems. These set
backs are extremely common with these types of crimes. You could never know exactly how a
person feels or what they have been through so it is important to try to understand as much as
you can. The only way of doing this is gaining the trust of the victim so you can ensure them that
they will be safe. Remaining focused throughout the entire court process is also important
because many court cases take months to resolve. A victim may think they are over the situation
because it happened months ago. This is until they have to see the defendant, responding police
officer/ambulance, etc. all over again which will cause them to relive the experience. Observing
the victim’s behavior after this has happened is necessary so you know if they reacted well or
not.
Conclusion
After completing a summer internship and conducting research on other courts, I’ve
learned that victim advocates are very important in the rehabilitation process. Although they are
not really powerful lawyers or judges and barely ever get recognized, they are extremely
important to the victim and their rights. As mentioned before, the victim’s advocate does not
come in contact with them until the crime is already going through the court process. First
responders are also very important to the victim and the rehabilitation process because they are

10. VICTIM ADVOCATE 10
the first people the victim talks to. I think we need to make it a requirement for law enforcement
and EMT to provide the victim with a step by step guide that will let them know what is going to
happen in the next few days or weeks. This would change the opinion about law enforcement
and first responders much more because they victim will leave the scene feeling much more
informed. Being a victim advocate is a tough job because you never know how the person is
going to react to their situation. Staying open minded and understanding is the best way to
approach each and every victim.

11. VICTIM ADVOCATE 11
Reference Page
Anderson, K. L. (2015). Victims’ Voices and Victims’ Choices in Three IPV Courts. Violence
Against Women, 21(1), 105-124. doi:10.1177/1077801214564166
Baldry, A. C. (1996). Rape victims’ risk of secondary victimization by police officers. Issues in
Criminological and Legal Psychology, 25, 65–68.
Bennett, L., Goodman, L., & Dutton, M. A. (1999) Systemic obstacles to the criminal
prosecution of a battering partner. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 761–772
Brown, J. M., Hamilton, C., & O’Neill, D. (2007). Characteristics associated with rape attrition
and the role played by skepticism or legal rationality by investigators and prosecutors.
Psychology, Crime & Law, 13, 355– 370.
Campbell, R., & Raja, S. (1999). Secondary victimization of rape victims: Insights from mental
health professionals who treat survivors of violence. Violence and Victims, 14, 261–275.
Cassidy, R. M. (2006). Reconsidering spousal privileges after Crawford. American Journal of
Criminal Law, 33, 339-375

12. VICTIM ADVOCATE 12
Curtis-Fawley, S., & Daly, K. (2005). Gendered Violence and Restorative Justice: The Views of
Victim Advocates. Violence Against Women, 11(5), 603-638. doi:10.1177/1077801205274488
Davis, Robert C., Chris S. O’Sullivan, Donald J. Farole, Jr., and Michael Rempel. 2008. A
comparison of two prosecution policies in cases of intimate partner violence: Mandatory case
filing versus following the victim’s lead. Criminology & Public Policy. This issue
Erez, Edna, Leigh Roeger, and Frank Morgan. 1997. Victim Harm, Impact Statements, and
Victim Satisfaction with Justice: An Australian Experience. International Review of Victimology
5:37–60.
Frazier, P. A., & Haney, B. (1996). Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor,
and victim perspectives. Law and Human Behavior, 1, 607– 628.
Goodrum, S. (2013). Bridging the Gap Between Prosecutors' Cases and Victims' Biographies in
the Criminal Justice System Through Shared Emotions. Law & Social Inquiry, 38(2), 257-287.
doi:10.1111/lsi.12020
Hanna, C. (1998). The paradox of hope: The crime and punishment of domestic violence.
William and Mary Law Review, 39, 1505-1584.

13. VICTIM ADVOCATE 13
Hirsch, Susan F. 2008. In the Moment of Greatest Calamity: Terrorism, Grief, and a Victim’s
Quest for Justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Howerton, A. (2006). Police response to crime: Differences in the application of law by race.
Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 4(3), 51–66.
Jordan, J. (2001). Worlds apart? Women, rape, and the police reporting process. British Journal
of Criminology, 41, 679–706
Kilpatrick, D. G., Beatty, D., & Howley, S. S. (1998). The rights of crime victims— does legal
protection make a difference? Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice
Programs
Konradi, A. (1997). Too little, too late: Prosecutors’ pre-court preparation of rape survivors. Law
& Social Inquiry, 22, 1–54.
KRUTTSCHNITT, C. (2008). THE EFFECT OF “NO-DROP” PROSECUTION POLICIES ON
PERPETRATORS OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE. Criminology & Public Policy, 7(4),
629-632. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2008.00531.x
Nichols, A. J. (2014). No-Drop Prosecution in Domestic Violence Cases: Survivor-Defined and
Social Change Approaches to Victim Advocacy. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(11),
2114-2142. doi:10.1177/0886260513516385

14. VICTIM ADVOCATE 14
Parsons, J., & Bergin, T. (2010). The impact of criminal justice involvement on victims' mental
health. Journal Of Traumatic Stress,23 (2), 182-188. doi:10.1002/jts.20505
Rose, V. M., & Randall, S. C. (1982). The impact of investigator perceptions of victim
legitimacy on the processing of rape/sexual assault cases. Symbolic Interaction, 5, 23–36.
Umbreit, M. S. (1998). Restorative justice through victim-offender mediation: A multi-site
assessment. Western Criminology Review, 1. Retrieved August 3, 2007, from
http://wcr.sonoma.edu/v1n1/umbreit.html