This document discusses using the Financial Valuation Tool (FV Tool) to estimate the expected net present values of sustainability investments for Newmont Ghana Gold's Ahafo mine project. The tool helps answer questions about determining the right portfolio of sustainability investments and their potential financial returns. It also supports alignment across different business functions. The document provides examples of sustainability scenarios analyzed in the tool and discusses indirect value protection from mitigating project risks. Quotes from Newmont Ghana Gold employees note improvements in cross-functional collaboration and the sustainability team's ability to articulate business cases in financial terms since using the FV Tool.
Etude PwC "Bridging the gap" sur les investisseurs institutionnels (mai 2015)PwC France
Selon la dernière étude du cabinet d’audit et de conseil PwC, intitulée « Bridging the gap », sept investisseurs institutionnels sur dix (70 %) – parmi les 60 qui ont été interrogés par PwC au plan mondial – affirment qu’ils refuseraient de participer à une levée de fonds de private equity ou à un co-investissement si ceux-ci présentaient un risque environnemental, social ou de gouvernance.
Méthodologie :
Pour réaliser cette étude, PwC a mené des entretiens individuels avec 60 commanditaires de 14 pays, totalisant quelque 500 milliards USD d’allocation aux gérants ou general partners (GP) de fonds de private equity. Les participants à l’enquête ont répondu sur la base du volontariat, d’où une surreprésentation probable des investisseurs relativement avancés dans leur approche de l’investissement responsable. Le panel était composé à 30 % de fonds de pension, à 20 % de gestionnaires d’actifs et à 7 % de fonds souverains ou publics. Parmi les répondants figuraient de grands fonds de pension du monde entier, comme le CalSTRS (caisse de retraite de l’enseignement public de Californie), l’USS (caisse de retraite de l’enseignement supérieur britannique), la caisse de retraite de BT, le West Midlands Pension Fund, le Wellcome Trust, un fonds de pension suédois et des fonds confessionnels aux États-Unis et en Finlande. Parmi les principaux gestionnaires d’actifs figuraient les sociétés Aberdeen, Hermes GPE, F&C et BlackRock. 7 investisseurs français ont aussi participé à cette étude comme par exemple BPI France, Ardian ou OFI Asset Management (devenu depuis SWEN Capital Partners).
Responsible investment is rapidly becoming a mainstream concern within the investment industry. The dramatic growth in the number of investors who have adopted the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is only the latest indicator of the increased attention the sector is paying to the integration of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into investment management.
Governance & integrated thinking….through a responsible investor lens: The ch...Dr Raj Thamotheram
This presentation identifies that academic/practitioner collaboration could be the catalyst for a more integrated approach to governance and how this could address the failure of traditional corporate governance thinking to deliver value even its narrow frame of reference, leave aside taking account of wider mega-trends. The presentation also considers what academics can do differently to realise this potential.
Insights, a product of the ongoing work of The Rockefeller Foundation’s strategic research team, identifies compelling and emerging problem trends and areas of dynamism where there might be opportunities for intervention.
Etude PwC "Bridging the gap" sur les investisseurs institutionnels (mai 2015)PwC France
Selon la dernière étude du cabinet d’audit et de conseil PwC, intitulée « Bridging the gap », sept investisseurs institutionnels sur dix (70 %) – parmi les 60 qui ont été interrogés par PwC au plan mondial – affirment qu’ils refuseraient de participer à une levée de fonds de private equity ou à un co-investissement si ceux-ci présentaient un risque environnemental, social ou de gouvernance.
Méthodologie :
Pour réaliser cette étude, PwC a mené des entretiens individuels avec 60 commanditaires de 14 pays, totalisant quelque 500 milliards USD d’allocation aux gérants ou general partners (GP) de fonds de private equity. Les participants à l’enquête ont répondu sur la base du volontariat, d’où une surreprésentation probable des investisseurs relativement avancés dans leur approche de l’investissement responsable. Le panel était composé à 30 % de fonds de pension, à 20 % de gestionnaires d’actifs et à 7 % de fonds souverains ou publics. Parmi les répondants figuraient de grands fonds de pension du monde entier, comme le CalSTRS (caisse de retraite de l’enseignement public de Californie), l’USS (caisse de retraite de l’enseignement supérieur britannique), la caisse de retraite de BT, le West Midlands Pension Fund, le Wellcome Trust, un fonds de pension suédois et des fonds confessionnels aux États-Unis et en Finlande. Parmi les principaux gestionnaires d’actifs figuraient les sociétés Aberdeen, Hermes GPE, F&C et BlackRock. 7 investisseurs français ont aussi participé à cette étude comme par exemple BPI France, Ardian ou OFI Asset Management (devenu depuis SWEN Capital Partners).
Responsible investment is rapidly becoming a mainstream concern within the investment industry. The dramatic growth in the number of investors who have adopted the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is only the latest indicator of the increased attention the sector is paying to the integration of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into investment management.
Governance & integrated thinking….through a responsible investor lens: The ch...Dr Raj Thamotheram
This presentation identifies that academic/practitioner collaboration could be the catalyst for a more integrated approach to governance and how this could address the failure of traditional corporate governance thinking to deliver value even its narrow frame of reference, leave aside taking account of wider mega-trends. The presentation also considers what academics can do differently to realise this potential.
Insights, a product of the ongoing work of The Rockefeller Foundation’s strategic research team, identifies compelling and emerging problem trends and areas of dynamism where there might be opportunities for intervention.
The PMBOK Guide 7th Edition Exposure Draft is built around a Value Delivery System, of which projects are a fundamental component. Value is the foundation of successful change initiatives which include strategic initiatives, programs, projects, innovation and continuous improvement.
Value can be defined as a ratio between the alignment with stakeholders’ expected benefits and the achievability of the proposed solutions. The Value ratio is also the basis for business analysis techniques like the ROI (Return vs Investment), NPV (Net Present Value) SWOT analysis, and the project management’s Scope and Quality vs Time and Cost. Value management is also strongly linked to creativity and innovativeness which are essential in today’s VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Complex and Ambiguous) context.
To support this approach, Benefits Realization Management (Alignment) will be considered as one aspect of the value ratio and Risk Optimization (or Achievability) as the other aspect of that ratio.
The presentation shows how to calculate the value index and use it to prioritise change initiatives, not only on their alignment to objectives, but also on their achievability, or overall risk.
Thus enabling , sponsors, portfolio, program and project managers to define, measure and deliver value to the business.
Speaker - Dr. Michel Thiry
Michel has an extensive worldwide experience and has worked in many cultural environments. He is recognized as a worldwide authority in strategic applications of project, program and value at organizational level and has supported the development and implementation of numerous strategic programs for major corporations in various fields.
He has written and lectured widely and been invited to sit on expert panels in international Academic and Practitioner forums and is the author of “A Framework for Value Management Practice” and of the best-seller “Program Management”. He is currently preparing a book titled 'Making Sense of Value' to published in 2021
This key note speech at a recent Rutgers conference on innovation was focused on opening the aperture of the participants thinking. Its title, "???", provoked interest even before the talk was delivered.
What is your pension plan doing to educate trustees?sharingmyideas
"What is Your Pension Plan Doing to Educate Trustees?" was presented in Phila on Wednesday, September 19, 2012 for the PA Association of Public Employee Retirement Systems where I described the principles of engagement for attendees to take it back to their plans and begin to build high performance boards. The takeaway is, “engage your trustees and you won’t be able to contain their energy to learn and act.” Attched is my Powerpoint.
Best-in-Class in Methodologies for Putting a Monetary Value on Social ImpactSustainable Brands
Bea boccalandro, SROI Thought Leader, Georgetown university
Witold Henisz, Deloitte & Touche Professor of Management, The Wharton School, Univeristy of Pennyslvania
Lise Laurin, Director & Founder, EarthShift
What are the most pragmatic methodologies for converting various measures of social impact into monetary terms? Why have 'Social ROI' models seen both ups and downs over the last several years? How are smart brands turning SROI results into powerful communications pieces?
SUSTAINABLE INVESTING STRATEGIES: WHY INVESTOR INTEREST CONTINUES - Michael L...IFG Network marcus evans
Michael Lent, VERIS WEALTH PARTNERS - Speaker at the 2013 IFG Wealth Management Forum held in Phoenix, AZ, April 22-23, delivered his presentation entitled SUSTAINABLE INVESTING STRATEGIES: WHY INVESTOR INTEREST CONTINUES
Frank Mantero, director of corporate citizenship at General Electric, discussed corporate social responsibility (CSR) and it's role in PR and driving business growth.
RESEARCH II Grade Sheet Agency Assessment Paper Part I D.docxverad6
RESEARCH II Grade Sheet
Agency Assessment Paper Part I Description of the Program
Name of Student _________________________________________________
1.An overview of the program (Heading)
2. History of the organization?
3. Mission statement in the organization
4. Organization Structure
5. History of the program within the organization
6. Program’s rationale /
definition. General purpose of the program
7..Social problems addressed by the Program (Explain in full detail with statistics) (Heading)- 1pg.
8.Intervention Methods (Heading)
9. Methods proposed to achieve the
program’s results
10. Theories that underlie the proposed
Interventions
11.Logic within the program in using these
interventions to achieve its goals
12 Describe the length of services
13.Program Funding and Cost –cost per day in hospice in New Jersey.
(Subheadings)
14. Method for Program Funding
(Public, private, state, federal, or
Local money? Public or private
Organization/) This is a private company
15.Characteristics of the staff providing services –(Heading)
16.Professional and non-professional
staff Role and credentials
(What are professional and non-
professional staff background? Are
they trained in the type of
intervention being utilized by the
program? What are the
professionals’ perspectives on
the model of intervention being
utilized?
17.What standardized method is used to
evaluate the staff performance and
client satisfaction? (Provide
SAMPLEs)
Implementation issues –(Heading)
(Subheadings)
18. Successes and Challenges in the program?
19.Do the intervention methods seem
appropriate?
20. Are people coming for services?
21.Are they the types of clients expected to come?
22.Has the amount of outreach work been underestimated and has this delayed program implementation?
Conclusion: The students demonstrate knowledge and skills by writing a summary of the evaluation process. Describe the successes and limitations of the program and the difficulties you encountered in writing this paper? What do they think needs to be changed in order to enhance this program? How would implement these changes? How does this program evaluation paper relate to social work policy, practice and research?
What Constitutes Graduate Level Writing.pdf
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
Source: Unknown
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
Dy.
Stephen Jenner designed, implemented and operated the Criminal Justice System (overseeing a £2 billion investment in modernising justice) IT approach to Portfolio & Benefits Management that has been recognised internationally (in reports to the OECD and European Commission and in a case study published by Gartner) and which won the 2007 Civil Service Financial Management Award. He was infamously described by the UK Government CIO as, "the Rottweiler of benefits management." Steve will outline the research evidence, the possible explanations and solutions which call for a radically different approach to the way organisations approach the realisation of benefits from their investments in change.
Good Measures: The Case for Quantification in Impact InvestmentPabloVerra
The impact investment sector has duly recognized that impact measurement is central to legitimizing the practice of impact investing. Increasingly, investors want to have more detailed social and environmental performance data so they can scrutinize it as they do with financial data. This enables investors to have a better understanding of social returns on investment and re-allocate investment capital accordingly.
A Seed/Startup Venture Fund & Collaboration Community working with, supporting and compensating Incubators, Universities and Economic Development Agencies
The PMBOK Guide 7th Edition Exposure Draft is built around a Value Delivery System, of which projects are a fundamental component. Value is the foundation of successful change initiatives which include strategic initiatives, programs, projects, innovation and continuous improvement.
Value can be defined as a ratio between the alignment with stakeholders’ expected benefits and the achievability of the proposed solutions. The Value ratio is also the basis for business analysis techniques like the ROI (Return vs Investment), NPV (Net Present Value) SWOT analysis, and the project management’s Scope and Quality vs Time and Cost. Value management is also strongly linked to creativity and innovativeness which are essential in today’s VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Complex and Ambiguous) context.
To support this approach, Benefits Realization Management (Alignment) will be considered as one aspect of the value ratio and Risk Optimization (or Achievability) as the other aspect of that ratio.
The presentation shows how to calculate the value index and use it to prioritise change initiatives, not only on their alignment to objectives, but also on their achievability, or overall risk.
Thus enabling , sponsors, portfolio, program and project managers to define, measure and deliver value to the business.
Speaker - Dr. Michel Thiry
Michel has an extensive worldwide experience and has worked in many cultural environments. He is recognized as a worldwide authority in strategic applications of project, program and value at organizational level and has supported the development and implementation of numerous strategic programs for major corporations in various fields.
He has written and lectured widely and been invited to sit on expert panels in international Academic and Practitioner forums and is the author of “A Framework for Value Management Practice” and of the best-seller “Program Management”. He is currently preparing a book titled 'Making Sense of Value' to published in 2021
This key note speech at a recent Rutgers conference on innovation was focused on opening the aperture of the participants thinking. Its title, "???", provoked interest even before the talk was delivered.
What is your pension plan doing to educate trustees?sharingmyideas
"What is Your Pension Plan Doing to Educate Trustees?" was presented in Phila on Wednesday, September 19, 2012 for the PA Association of Public Employee Retirement Systems where I described the principles of engagement for attendees to take it back to their plans and begin to build high performance boards. The takeaway is, “engage your trustees and you won’t be able to contain their energy to learn and act.” Attched is my Powerpoint.
Best-in-Class in Methodologies for Putting a Monetary Value on Social ImpactSustainable Brands
Bea boccalandro, SROI Thought Leader, Georgetown university
Witold Henisz, Deloitte & Touche Professor of Management, The Wharton School, Univeristy of Pennyslvania
Lise Laurin, Director & Founder, EarthShift
What are the most pragmatic methodologies for converting various measures of social impact into monetary terms? Why have 'Social ROI' models seen both ups and downs over the last several years? How are smart brands turning SROI results into powerful communications pieces?
SUSTAINABLE INVESTING STRATEGIES: WHY INVESTOR INTEREST CONTINUES - Michael L...IFG Network marcus evans
Michael Lent, VERIS WEALTH PARTNERS - Speaker at the 2013 IFG Wealth Management Forum held in Phoenix, AZ, April 22-23, delivered his presentation entitled SUSTAINABLE INVESTING STRATEGIES: WHY INVESTOR INTEREST CONTINUES
Frank Mantero, director of corporate citizenship at General Electric, discussed corporate social responsibility (CSR) and it's role in PR and driving business growth.
RESEARCH II Grade Sheet Agency Assessment Paper Part I D.docxverad6
RESEARCH II Grade Sheet
Agency Assessment Paper Part I Description of the Program
Name of Student _________________________________________________
1.An overview of the program (Heading)
2. History of the organization?
3. Mission statement in the organization
4. Organization Structure
5. History of the program within the organization
6. Program’s rationale /
definition. General purpose of the program
7..Social problems addressed by the Program (Explain in full detail with statistics) (Heading)- 1pg.
8.Intervention Methods (Heading)
9. Methods proposed to achieve the
program’s results
10. Theories that underlie the proposed
Interventions
11.Logic within the program in using these
interventions to achieve its goals
12 Describe the length of services
13.Program Funding and Cost –cost per day in hospice in New Jersey.
(Subheadings)
14. Method for Program Funding
(Public, private, state, federal, or
Local money? Public or private
Organization/) This is a private company
15.Characteristics of the staff providing services –(Heading)
16.Professional and non-professional
staff Role and credentials
(What are professional and non-
professional staff background? Are
they trained in the type of
intervention being utilized by the
program? What are the
professionals’ perspectives on
the model of intervention being
utilized?
17.What standardized method is used to
evaluate the staff performance and
client satisfaction? (Provide
SAMPLEs)
Implementation issues –(Heading)
(Subheadings)
18. Successes and Challenges in the program?
19.Do the intervention methods seem
appropriate?
20. Are people coming for services?
21.Are they the types of clients expected to come?
22.Has the amount of outreach work been underestimated and has this delayed program implementation?
Conclusion: The students demonstrate knowledge and skills by writing a summary of the evaluation process. Describe the successes and limitations of the program and the difficulties you encountered in writing this paper? What do they think needs to be changed in order to enhance this program? How would implement these changes? How does this program evaluation paper relate to social work policy, practice and research?
What Constitutes Graduate Level Writing.pdf
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
Source: Unknown
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
slevin
Typewritten Text
Dy.
Stephen Jenner designed, implemented and operated the Criminal Justice System (overseeing a £2 billion investment in modernising justice) IT approach to Portfolio & Benefits Management that has been recognised internationally (in reports to the OECD and European Commission and in a case study published by Gartner) and which won the 2007 Civil Service Financial Management Award. He was infamously described by the UK Government CIO as, "the Rottweiler of benefits management." Steve will outline the research evidence, the possible explanations and solutions which call for a radically different approach to the way organisations approach the realisation of benefits from their investments in change.
Good Measures: The Case for Quantification in Impact InvestmentPabloVerra
The impact investment sector has duly recognized that impact measurement is central to legitimizing the practice of impact investing. Increasingly, investors want to have more detailed social and environmental performance data so they can scrutinize it as they do with financial data. This enables investors to have a better understanding of social returns on investment and re-allocate investment capital accordingly.
A Seed/Startup Venture Fund & Collaboration Community working with, supporting and compensating Incubators, Universities and Economic Development Agencies
5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice 24-28 August 2014 in Davos, Switzerland
5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice 24-28 August 2014 in Davos, Switzerland
Conference featuring leading companies, investors, NGOs and other experts on how to measure and value corporate sustainability and what that means in practice.
IHP 420 Ethical Theories Worksheet Guidelines and Rubric .docxalanrgibson41217
IHP 420 Ethical Theories Worksheet Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: When you are considering responses to healthcare situations, it is important to be able to quickly identify the underlying ethical and bioethical
theories driving a proposed solution. While completing the worksheet, consider the core elements of the theory that must be addressed in the solution.
Prompt: In this activity, you will utilize the main ethical and bioethical theories in solutions to a proposed scenario.
Part One: Propose a solution to the following scenario using each of the five ethical theories presented in this module. Explain how your solution aligns
with the major ideas within each theory.
Scenario: There is a pandemic of a contagious disease. In the United States, there is only enough of a vaccine to cover 70% of the population. How do you
determine who gets the vaccine?
Part Two: Consider the same scenarios, but explain what process you would need to add to your solution to protect the bioethics principles.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Complete the Ethical Theories Worksheet using complete sentences. If you use resources, cite them according to APA formatting.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Part One Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
explanation demonstrates
complex grasp of the theories
Explains a solution to the
scenario and applies the ethical
theories from the worksheet
Explains solutions to the
scenario but applies the
theories incorrectly or
incompletely
Does not provide explanation of
how ethical theories apply to
the provided scenario
50
Part Two Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
explanation demonstrates
complex grasp of the bioethics
principles
Explains a solution to the
scenario and applies the ethical
theories from the worksheet
Explains solutions to the
scenario but applies the
theories incorrectly or
incompletely
Does not provide explanation of
how ethical theories apply to
the provided scenario
45
Articulation of
Response
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization and is presented in
a professional and easy-to-read
format
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact
readability and articulation of
main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas
5
Total 100%
http://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/course_repository/undergraduate/ihp/ihp420/ihp420_ethical_theories_worksheet.docx
one vulcan, locally led
201 7 ANNUAL REPORT
from
our chairman
Dear Shareholders & Friends
The past year was one of solid performance
by our employees, as they worked together
to levera.
Similar to Vitold Henisz slides: “Financial Returns to Stakeholder Capital: Tying Community Investment Back to the Balance Sheet” (20)
where can I find a legit pi merchant onlineDOT TECH
Yes. This is very easy what you need is a recommendation from someone who has successfully traded pi coins before with a merchant.
Who is a pi merchant?
A pi merchant is someone who buys pi network coins and resell them to Investors looking forward to hold thousands of pi coins before the open mainnet.
I will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi merchant to trade with
@Pi_vendor_247
how to sell pi coins on Bitmart crypto exchangeDOT TECH
Yes. Pi network coins can be exchanged but not on bitmart exchange. Because pi network is still in the enclosed mainnet. The only way pioneers are able to trade pi coins is by reselling the pi coins to pi verified merchants.
A verified merchant is someone who buys pi network coins and resell it to exchanges looking forward to hold till mainnet launch.
I will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi merchant to trade with.
@Pi_vendor_247
BYD SWOT Analysis and In-Depth Insights 2024.pptxmikemetalprod
Indepth analysis of the BYD 2024
BYD (Build Your Dreams) is a Chinese automaker and battery manufacturer that has snowballed over the past two decades to become a significant player in electric vehicles and global clean energy technology.
This SWOT analysis examines BYD's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats as it competes in the fast-changing automotive and energy storage industries.
Founded in 1995 and headquartered in Shenzhen, BYD started as a battery company before expanding into automobiles in the early 2000s.
Initially manufacturing gasoline-powered vehicles, BYD focused on plug-in hybrid and fully electric vehicles, leveraging its expertise in battery technology.
Today, BYD is the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer, delivering over 1.2 million electric cars globally. The company also produces electric buses, trucks, forklifts, and rail transit.
On the energy side, BYD is a major supplier of rechargeable batteries for cell phones, laptops, electric vehicles, and energy storage systems.
how can i use my minded pi coins I need some funds.DOT TECH
If you are interested in selling your pi coins, i have a verified pi merchant, who buys pi coins and resell them to exchanges looking forward to hold till mainnet launch.
Because the core team has announced that pi network will not be doing any pre-sale. The only way exchanges like huobi, bitmart and hotbit can get pi is by buying from miners.
Now a merchant stands in between these exchanges and the miners. As a link to make transactions smooth. Because right now in the enclosed mainnet you can't sell pi coins your self. You need the help of a merchant,
i will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi merchant below. 👇 I and my friends has traded more than 3000pi coins with him successfully.
@Pi_vendor_247
Empowering the Unbanked: The Vital Role of NBFCs in Promoting Financial Inclu...Vighnesh Shashtri
In India, financial inclusion remains a critical challenge, with a significant portion of the population still unbanked. Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) have emerged as key players in bridging this gap by providing financial services to those often overlooked by traditional banking institutions. This article delves into how NBFCs are fostering financial inclusion and empowering the unbanked.
how to sell pi coins at high rate quickly.DOT TECH
Where can I sell my pi coins at a high rate.
Pi is not launched yet on any exchange. But one can easily sell his or her pi coins to investors who want to hold pi till mainnet launch.
This means crypto whales want to hold pi. And you can get a good rate for selling pi to them. I will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi vendor below.
A vendor is someone who buys from a miner and resell it to a holder or crypto whale.
Here is the telegram contact of my vendor:
@Pi_vendor_247
when will pi network coin be available on crypto exchange.DOT TECH
There is no set date for when Pi coins will enter the market.
However, the developers are working hard to get them released as soon as possible.
Once they are available, users will be able to exchange other cryptocurrencies for Pi coins on designated exchanges.
But for now the only way to sell your pi coins is through verified pi vendor.
Here is the telegram contact of my personal pi vendor
@Pi_vendor_247
If you are looking for a pi coin investor. Then look no further because I have the right one he is a pi vendor (he buy and resell to whales in China). I met him on a crypto conference and ever since I and my friends have sold more than 10k pi coins to him And he bought all and still want more. I will drop his telegram handle below just send him a message.
@Pi_vendor_247
2. IntroducAon
to
the
FV
Tool
(www.fvtool.com)
2
§ Es0mates
expected
net
present
values
(NPV)
of
local
investments
§
Answers
two
cri0cal
ques0ons:
§ “what”
is
the
right
porDolio
of
sustainability
investments?
§ “what”
is
the
financial
return
they
will
likely
bring?
§
Supports
alignment
across
finance,
risk,
opera0ons,
social,
HR
3. FV Investment Scenarios
Scenario
B
:
• Health:
expanding
mi+ga+on
for
broader
popula+on
• Water
&
Sanita2on:
expanding
mi+ga+on
for
broader
popula+on
Scenario
A:
• Health:
mi+ga+on
only
for
workers
&
community
• Water
&
Sanita2on:
mi+ga+on
only
for
workers
&
community
Difference
between
Scenario
A
and
B
4. Value
Driver
Examples
§ More
Conciliatory
Land
Acquisi0on
Process:
§ $2.87
per
square
foot
less
than
expected
leading
to
$230,000
savings.
§
Four
months
faster
than
expected
leading
to
$700,000
more
revenue.
§ Malaria
Eradica0on:
§ Reduc0on
from
3,195
cases
of
malaria
to
0
§ 3
days
of
absence
from
work
or
$120
of
lost
produc0vity
§ Savings
of
$30
worth
of
treatment
§ Addi0onal
lost
work
an
produc0vity
for
family
illness
§ Higher
recruitment
and
reten0on
costs
for
most
skilled
workers
§ $850,000,
two-‐year
program
§ Distributed
bed
nets,
instructed
and
monitored
use
§ Sprayed
insec0cide
&
improved
drainage
to
eliminate
breeding
pools.
5. Indirect Value Protection Based on Six Project Risks!
• Roadblocks that disrupted production which were expected to
occur once every other year, last one week and cost a fixed $3m
plus one week of lost revenue."
• Serious complaints which are expected to occur 12 times per year
with an expected average cost of $50,000. "
• Exploration protests which were expected to occur every other
year, last two weeks and cost $5m plus two weeks of lost revenue."
• Fines and legal judgments which were expected to occur every
third year with an average cost of $3m."
• Water protests which were expected to occur every other year with
an average cost of $200,000"
• The risk of expropriation which was estimated at a 1 in 1,000
probability in any given year."
5
8. FVTOOL, NPV of sustainability!
Dashboard
-‐
Total
Sustainability
Value
Added
For
$2billion
CAPEX
project,
sustainability
investments
returned
as
much
as
$187
million
of
NPV.
8
9. Notable Quotes: Sustainability Team
When
we
first
heard
of
it,
those
of
us
on
the
social
side
were
happy
to
get
something
that
would
help
Finance
understand
us.
We
are
more
confident
in
cos+ng
the
programs
that
we
do.
This
puts
us
in
a
much
be@er
posi+on
with
finance.
In
previous
mee+ngs,
other
departments
had
figures
and
we
had
to
talk
to
explain.
Now
we
are
puDng
figures
to
our
words
just
like
other
departments.
The
change
within
the
ESR
team
is
marked.
What
are
these
risks
that
we
are
trying
to
mi+gate?
Are
their
costs
jus+fied
in
terms
or
risk
mi+ga+on?
Previously
program
owners
were
not
connec+ng
the
dots
to
risk
mi+ga+on
or
value
crea+on.
Now
we
challenge
the
numbers.
Previously,
we
had
no
framework
to
evaluate.
People
are
now
trying
to
highlight
the
value
of
their
ini+a+ves
for
the
business
not
just
for
stakeholders.
10. Notable Quotes: Finance Team
My
biggest
surprise
was
that
it
is
possible
for
the
ESR
team
to
have
a
conversa+on
in
financial
terms.
Every
conversa+on
I
had
with
them
before,
…
they
never
could
ar+culate
their
assump+ons
and
acknowledge
costs
and
benefits.
Now
they
can
and
do.
They
have
their
act
together
and
can
explain
a
business
case
…
Previously,
they
were
not
able
to
see
their
business
case.
…
Finance
and
[Environment
and
Social
Responsibility]
are
now
working
together
much
be@er
than
before.
Just
those
changes
alone
jus+fy
the
effort
put
into
the
pilot.
Ebenezer
Kyere-‐Buabeng
,
Finance
Newmont
Ghana
Gold
In
the
last
business
planning
mee+ng,
I
saw
a
huge
improvement
in
SR's
presenta+on
of
budget
and
supported
by
data
of
the
business
benefits
of
SR
programs.
The
mee+ng
went
very
smoothly
compared
to
previous
mee+ngs.
Lester
Ampong,
Senior
Business
Planning
Analyst,
Newmont
Ghana
Gold
11. Notable Quotes: Group Executive
Quan+fying
the
net
present
value
of
sustainability
ini+a+ves
at
Newmont’s
Ahafo
mine
in
Ghana
had
finally
allowed
the
company
to
get
“Beyond
NPV.”
Nick
Cocs,
Group
Execu0ve,
ESR
12. Key Findings of FV Ahafo Pilot and
Developments over Last 9 Months!
• Value creation swamped by value protection!
• Estimates of latter mostly qualitative in FVTOOL!
• Need better quantification of stakeholder preferences
within FVTOOL!
• Who wants what how badly?!
• Who has power?!
• Who influences whom?!
• Jan 2013 add-on incorporates stakeholder influence into
risk mitigation consequence but how to sequence
stakeholder mapping & analysis and financial valuation?!
• Cross-functional conversations and collaboration swamped
value of npv calculation!
! 12
13. 4.
STRATEGIC
RECOMMENDATIONS
&
SCENARIO
ANALYSIS
• Ini+a+ves:
Around
which
issues?
• Coali+on-‐building:
With
which
partners?
• Performance:
How
might
specific
inita0ves
play
out?
3.
STRATEGIC
PRIORITIZATION
OF
STAKEHOLDERS
&
ISSUES
• Power:
Who
influences
whom?
• Salience:
How
much
do
they
care?
• Effec+ve
power
=
Power
×
Salience
2.
OPINION
&
ISSUE
IDENTIFICATION
• Social
License:
Opinion
of
company
and
project?
• Preoccupa+ons:
Key
issues
of
concern?
1.
STAKEHOLDER
CENSUS
• Coverage:
All
local
&
na0onal
stakeholder
organiza0ons
• Method:
Field
interviews
by
trained
local
teams
• Data
collected:
Opinions,
issues
of
concern,
rela0onships
Ø A
“stakeholder”
is
any
external
group
or
organiza0on
that
can
significantly
affect
a
company
or
project’s
opera0ons,
or
that
is
significantly
affected
by
these
opera0ons.
Ø We
begin
an
engagement
by
compiling
data
on
stakeholders’
concerns
and
priori0es,
opinions
toward
the
company
or
project,
and
rela0ons
with
each
other.
Ø A
stakeholder
census—in
which
specially
trained
teams
acempt
to
interview
representa0ves
from
all
of
a
company
or
project’s
stakeholders—provides
the
most
reliable
data.
Ø When
a
census
is
imprac0cal
or
infeasible,
we
employ
secondary
sources
such
as
tradi0onal
news
media,
“social”
media,
expert
assessments,
and
internal
client
data.
Stakeholder Mapping and Analysis:!Workflow!
14. Social License:
*
Adapted
from
Thomson
&
Bou+lier
(2011)
Four Levels!
Ø Psychological
iden2fica2on.
Stakeholders
feel
a
sense
of
“co-‐
ownership”
and
advocate
on
behalf
of
company
proposals.
Ø Approval.
Stakeholders
perceive
company
proposals
as
credible.
Ø Acceptance.
Stakeholders
evaluate
company
proposals
on
a
case-‐by-‐case
basis.
Ø Withheld/withdrawn.
Stakeholders’
nega0ve
percep0ons
result
in
ac0ons
that
compromise
access
to
finance,
legal
license,
material,
labor,
markets,
supply
chain,
etc.
Social
license
to
operate
(SLO):
stakeholder
percep+ons
of
the
acceptability
of
a
company
&
its
local
opera+ons
at
a
point
in
+me.
15. Social
contract
Stakeholders
perceive
the
company
to
respect
their
culture
&
customs,
meet
their
expecta0ons
about
its
role
in
society,
and
act
fairly.
Legi2macy
of
benefits
Stakeholders
perceive
net
economic
benefit
from
project.
Ins2tu2onalized
trust
Stakeholders
perceive
the
company
to
have
an
enduring
regard
for
their
interests,
which
they
reciprocate.
Social
capital
Stakeholders
perceive
the
company
to
listen,
respond,
keep
promises,
engage
in
dialogue,
and
exhibit
reciprocity.
Four Components!Social License:
16. Social
contract
Stakeholders
perceive
the
company
to
respect
their
culture
&
customs,
meet
their
expecta0ons
about
its
role
in
society,
and
act
fairly.
Ins2tu2onalized
trust
Stakeholders
perceive
the
company
to
have
an
enduring
regard
for
their
interests,
which
they
reciprocate.
Social
capital
Stakeholders
perceive
the
company
to
listen,
respond,
keep
promises,
engage
in
dialogue,
and
exhibit
reciprocity.
Legi2macy
of
benefits
Stakeholders
perceive
net
economic
benefit
from
project.
Four Components!Social License:
17. Social
contract
Ø The
company
contributes
to
our
well-‐being
in
the
long
run.
Ø The
company
treats
everyone
fairly.
Ø The
company
respects
our
ways.
Ø Our
organiza0on
and
the
company
have
a
similar
vision
for
the
future.
Social
capital
Ø The
company
honors
its
word
to
us.
Ø We
are
very
sa0sfied
with
our
rela0ons
with
the
company.
Ø The
presence
of
the
company
is
a
benefit
to
us.
Ø The
company
listens
to
us.
Ins2tu2onalized
trust
Ø The
company
gives
more
support
to
those
it
nega0vely
affects.
Ø The
company
shares
decision-‐making.
Ø The
company
considers
our
interests.
Ø The
company
openly
shares
relevant
informa0on
with
us.
Legi2macy
of
benefits
Ø We
can
gain
from
a
rela0onship
with
the
company.
Ø We
need
the
company’s
coopera0on
to
meet
our
goals.
Measurement!
We
measure
the
four
components
of
the
social
license
by
asking
interviewees
to
rate
their
level
of
agreement
or
disagreement
with
a
series
of
statements.
Social License:
This
methodology
has
been
validated
in
more
than
1,500
stakeholder
interviews
at
mining
and
construc0on
sites
located
on
four
con0nents.
18. Capital City of Country A
Mine Site A
Mine Site B
Country
A
Capital
City of
Country B
Mine 1 Mine 2 Mine 3
Score
(out
of
5.0)
Stakeholder
Support
for
Two
West
African
Mines
Stakeholder
support
in
capital
ci+es
is
significantly
higher
than
at
mine
sites.
Score
(out
of
5.0)
5
=
strongly
agree
with
3
=
neither
agree
nor
disagree
1
=
strongly
disagree
Country
B
19. 2.
OPINION
&
ISSUE
IDENTIFICATION
• Social
License:
Opinion
of
company
and
project?
• Preoccupa+ons:
Key
issues
of
concern?
Stakeholder Mapping and Analysis:!Workflow!
Ø To
iden0fy
the
issues
contribu0ng
to
the
gran0ng
or
withdrawal
of
the
social
license,
we
ask
interviewees
what
the
most
important
concerns
for
their
community
or
organiza0on
are.
Ø We
parse
interviewees’
responses
to
this
open-‐ended
ques0on
and
assign
a
numeric
code
to
each
dis0nct
issue
men0oned.
Ø We
group
individual
issues
into
global
categories
such
as
“environment”
and
“health,”
as
well
as
intermediate
categories
within
the
global
categories.
20. CMTY
Country
A
Mine
Site
A
Top
stakeholder
concerns
by
socioeconomic
group
(bubbles
indicate
average
menAons
per
stakeholder)
Ø The
ver0cal
axis
iden0fies
global
issue
categories.
Ø The
horizontal
axis
classifies
stakeholders
by
socioeconomic
group.
Ø The
number
inside
each
bubble
represents
the
average
number
of
0mes
the
corresponding
issue
was
men0oned
per
stakeholder
in
the
relevant
group.
Ø Larger
bubbles
indicate
higher
men0on
frequencies.
Wide
agreement
among
socioeconomic
groups
on
top
three
issue
categories.
21. 4.
STRATEGIC
RECOMMENDATIONS
&
SCENARIO
ANALYSIS
• Ini+a+ves:
Around
which
issues?
• Coali+on-‐building:
With
which
partners?
• Performance:
How
might
specific
inita0ves
play
out?
3.
STRATEGIC
PRIORITIZATION
OF
STAKEHOLDERS
&
ISSUES
• Power:
Who
influences
whom?
• Salience:
How
much
do
they
care?
• Effec+ve
power
=
Power
×
Salience
Stakeholder Mapping and Analysis:!Workflow!
2.
OPINION
&
ISSUE
IDENTIFICATION
• Social
License:
Opinion
of
company
and
project?
• Preoccupa+ons:
Key
issues
of
concern?
Ø For
purposes
of
developing
a
stakeholder
engagement
strategy,
stakeholders
and
issues
must
be
priori0zed.
Ø Emphasizing
the
issues
of
the
most
nega0vely
disposed
or
loudest
stakeholders
creates
perverse
incen0ves
and
may
be
an
inefficient
use
of
company
resources.
Ø Similarly,
addressing
the
most
commonly-‐cited
issues
rests
on
the
unwarranted
assump0on
that
all
stakeholders
merit
equal
acen0on.
Ø To
priori0ze
stakeholders
and
issues,
we
use
interview
data
to
assess
each
stakeholder's
power
to
influence
other
stakeholders,
as
well
as
the
extent
to
which
each
stakeholder
regards
company
or
project-‐
related
issues
as
salient.
Ø We
use
the
measures
of
salience
and
power,
along
with
a
combined
measure
labeled
“effec0ve
power,”
to
apply
a
series
of
weigh0ng
schemes
to
the
raw
data
on
issues
and
priori0es.
1.
STAKEHOLDER
CENSUS
• Coverage:
All
local
&
na0onal
stakeholder
organiza0ons
• Method:
Field
interviews
by
trained
local
teams
• Data
collected:
Opinions,
issues
of
concern,
rela0onships
22. Cmty
Country
A
Mine
Site
A
Top
stakeholder
concerns
by
socioeconomic
group
(bubbles
indicate
average
menAons
per
stakeholder
weighted
by
effec2ve
power)
Rela0vely
more
important
now
No
longer
broadly
important
23. • Supporters must be given real
responsibilities and authority to sway
waverers. "
• Cheerleaders must be managed with care
so as not to damage other relationships."
• Waverers are targets (for both sides)."
• Bystanders are allies with low salience.
Keep them informed so that they feel
consulted."
• Ignore disinterested skeptics.!
• Strategize to defeat interrogators and
challengers, but in a way that allows them
a face-saving way out. " ""
• Not much one can do about unpredictable
opponents—watch them carefully."
Adapted from D’Herbemont & César
(1998), Managing Sensitive Projects
Stakeholder Mapping and Analysis:!Prioritization!
−
−
+
+
Social
License
Salience
In
addi0on
to
priori0zing
specific
issues
of
concern
according
to
different
socioeconomic
groups’
effec0ve
power,
we
also
classify
stakeholders
into
“strategic
groups”
based
on
acributes
such
as
level
of
social
license
and
salience.
We
use
these
groupings
to
differen0ate
approaches
for
engaging
with
specific
stakeholders.
24. strategic
group
weighted
by
effecAve
power)
3.9
3.8
3.6
5.2
4.4
7.2
6.9
5.3
7.0
6.4
7.0
4.6
6.2
4.7
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
7.2
4.5
4.5
7.9
11.7
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
5.5
6.5
7.5
8.5
9.5
10.5
11.5
12.5
13.5
14.5
0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5
sanitation/hygiene
rates
and
payments
education
infrastructure
water
community
infrastructure
negative
health
concerns
Education/skills
training
information
provision
wa-‐
ver-‐
ers
(n=30)
cheer
lea-‐
ders
(n=24)
sup-‐
por-‐
ters
(n=22)
disint.
skep-‐
tic
(n=19)
by-‐
stan-‐
ders
(n=18)
inter-‐
roga-‐
tors
(n=17)
chal-‐
len-‐
gers
(n=6)
oppo-‐
nents
(n=2)
#N#N/A
#N/A
unemployment
0
0
0
0
transport
infrastructure
land
use
and
waste
Country
A,
Mine
Site
A
Top
stakeholder
concerns
by
(bubbles
indicate
average
menAons
per
stakeholder)
SOCIAL
LICENSE:
SALIENCE:
MED
SOCIAL
LICENSE:
SALIENCE:
HI
SOCIAL
LICENSE:
SALIENCE:
HI
SOCIAL
LICENSE:
SALIENCE:
HI
The
fact
that
“cheerleaders”
and
“supporters”
share
the
same
issues
of
concern
as
“opponents”
represents
an
opportunity.
Members
of
the
first
two
groups,
whose
numbers
are
greater,
could
exert
social
pressure
on
opponents
to
adopt
less
nega+ve
views.
According
to
the
same
logic,
the
fact
that
challengers
and
opponents
share
issues
of
concern
without
being
exposed
to
the
poten+al
modera+ng
influence
of
more
posi+vely
disposed
groups
represents
a
source
of
sociopoli+cal
risk.
25. Nat’l Police
Nat’l Health Service
Site A MuniAsy
Nat’l FireSrv
Site A_ChfNat’lDptUrbRds
Rdo Sta A
Rdo Sta B
Nat’l Health
Asy 3
CEO
Wms Grp
Enterprise A
Rdo Sta C
Rdo Sta D
Investigation
Nat’lMilitary
Youth Grp
Education
Nw_Asy
Nwspr A
QnM
CityHth
Town Asy
LandCom
T&C Plans
CvcEduc
EmplCom
Nat’l Minerals
Most
InfluenAal
Stakeholders,
Mine
Site
A
The
Na+onal
Police
and
the
Na+onal
Health
Service
are
the
two
most
influen+al
stakeholders
in
the
network,
due
to
the
large
number
of
other
stakeholders
to
which
they
are
+ed
as
well
as
the
“brokering”
role
that
each
plays
for
otherwise
unconnected
groups.
In
this
case,
the
level
of
social
license
granted
by
the
Na+onal
Health
Service
is
in
the
“approval”
range.
When
combined
with
the
agency’s
substan+al
influence
in
the
network,
its
posi+ve
orienta+on
suggests
the
poten+al
for
a
partnering
arrangement
that
could
raise
the
company’s
level
of
social
license
among
the
others.
The
interviews
also
provide
informa0on
about
the
“social
capital”
in
the
rela0onships
among
stakeholders.
We
convert
this
informa0on
into
network
graphs.
We
also
calculate
various
measures
of
social
influence
to
gain
insight
into
relevant
influence
dynamics,
and
ul0mately
into
engagement
strategies
that
leverage
these
dynamics.
26. RdoStaA
RdoStaB
Nat’lPolice
MediaSiteA
Nat’l FireSvc
Nat’lHealthSvc
Nat’l EPA RdoStaC
RdoStaD
RdoStaE
WmsGrp
NBSS IndustryChf_A
YouthChair City A Asy
City B Asy
Site A MuniPlans
MiningCo A
NatlDptUrbRds
TownAUnit
TownBUnit
Chf_B
City C Asy
City D Asy
XYZSvcs
Important Media Sector Links, Mine Site A!
Hypothe+cal
issue:
cholera
outbreak
a@ributed
to
mine
Engagement
Strategy
Ø Partner
with
Na+onal
Health
Service
Ø Use
Health
Service’s
influence
over
radio
sta+ons
to
customize
messaging
based
on
the
sta+ons’
divergent
opinions
of
the
company
28. 4.
STRATEGIC
RECOMMENDATIONS
&
SCENARIO
ANALYSIS
• Ini+a+ves:
Around
which
issues?
• Coali+on-‐building:
With
which
partners?
• Performance:
How
might
specific
inita0ves
play
out?
3.
STRATEGIC
PRIORITIZATION
OF
STAKEHOLDERS
&
ISSUES
• Power:
Who
influences
whom?
• Salience:
How
much
do
they
care?
• Effec+ve
power
=
Power
×
Salience
Stakeholder Mapping and Analysis:!Workflow!
2.
OPINION
&
ISSUE
IDENTIFICATION
• Social
License:
Opinion
of
company
and
project?
• Preoccupa+ons:
Key
issues
of
concern?
1.
STAKEHOLDER
CENSUS
• Coverage:
All
local
&
na0onal
stakeholder
organiza0ons
• Method:
Field
interviews
by
trained
local
teams
• Data
collected:
Opinions,
issues
of
concern,
rela0onships
Ø Using
the
insights
provided
by
the
various
analyses,
we
develop
alterna0ve
sets
of
ac0on-‐oriented
recommenda0ons,
or
“engagement
scenarios.”
Ø In
a
typical
scenario,
the
company
forms
coali0ons
with
selected
stakeholders
to
address
key
issues
of
concern
and,
ul0mately,
to
improve
its
overall
social
license.
Ø We
simulate
the
likely
socio-‐poli0cal
dynamics
of
each
scenario
using
a
dynamic
expected
u0lity
model
that
incorporates
social
preferences
and
structure.
The
model
resembles
those
used
by
the
World
Bank,
the
European
Commission,
and
U.S.
intelligence
agencies.
Ø Each
stakeholder
in
the
model
seeks
to
acain
their
preferred
outcome
and
to
maximize
their
chance
of
being
on
the
winning
“team”
by
influencing
other
stakeholders’
opinions
of
the
company
or
project.
Ø The
simula0on
predicts
how
the
company
or
project’s
overall
social
license
is
likely
to
evolve
under
each
engagement
scenario
versus
the
status
quo.
29. Strategic
RecommendaAons
&
Scenario
Analysis
Narrow initiative:
Transportation"
Partners
Municipal Council
Nat’l Health Service
Land Ministry"
Broad initiative:
Unemployment & Skills Training"
Partners
NGOs
National Government
Multi-stakeholder forum"
current:
3.11
Predicted
Social
License
Score
3.77
4.03
Both
scenarios
in
the
example
are
predicted
to
increase
the
company’s
social
license,
but
the
broader
ini+a+ve
focusing
on
unemployment
and
skills
training
is
predicted
to
have
a
larger
impact
than
that
of
the
narrow
ini+a+ve
focusing
on
transporta+on.
The
cumula+ve
impact
on
the
final
social
license
score
in
both
cases
reflects
an
ini+al
shin
of
opinion
among
certain
stakeholders
and
a
subsequent
shin
of
opinion
among
others
resul+ng
from
social
influence
dynamics
30. • Stakeholder
mapping
&
analysis
Due
Diligence
• Integra0ng
stakeholder
data
into
financial
&
opera0onal
performance
Integra0on
• Stakeholder
rela0onships
are
personal
rela0onships
Personal
• Humbly
adap0ng
to
nega0ve
feedback
in
a
necessarily
imperfect
system
Learning
• Strategically
communica0ng
to
reinforce
trust
&
reputa0on
Openness
• Cul0va0ng
an
externally
facing
long-‐
term
organiza0onal
culture
Mindset