User Centered Design Presentation
•
0 likes•126 views
The document summarizes a usability study of a university's digital media website. In phase 1, participants sorted website cards to evaluate the information architecture. In phase 2, participants completed tasks on the current website and a prototype to evaluate ease of use. Analysis found some individual tasks were easier on the prototype. Neither website was consistently faster. The study will continue with a larger sample size and qualitative data collection. Recommendations include changes to improve specific pages and navigation.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Creating a Virtuous Cycle - The Research and Design Feedback Loop
This document discusses the importance of an effective research and design feedback loop to create thoughtful and user-centered products. It outlines common pitfalls when research and design teams do not collaborate well, such as communicating findings, engaging with each other's work, and believing research results. It then provides a step-by-step "virtuous loop formula" to facilitate collaboration between research and design, including prioritizing research questions, jointly reviewing prototypes, evaluating findings together, and continuously revisiting questions and designs based on new insights. Following this process can help avoid reactive "patchwork" solutions and instead lead to thoughtful designs informed by user needs.
Graham Thomas - The Testers Toolbox - EuroSTAR 2010
EuroSTAR Software Testing Conference 2010 presentation on The Testers Toolbox by Graham Thomas. See more at: http://conference.eurostarsoftwaretesting.com/past-presentations/
Guerrilla (or Agile) Evaluation for Learning
Workplace Learning & Development professionals have a problem -- too often they don't get enough (or any) feedback on the efficacy of their designs. What can we do to fix that?
test_slides
The document summarizes the results of a think-aloud usability test of an idea sharing website. Key findings from the test included: 1) Many buttons were not distinguishable enough; 2) The descriptions and text in the "Add idea form" could be switched; and 3) The test confirmed how much was considered in the design. Errors noted were testing in a group room versus privately and assistants providing too much guidance. Overall, participants liked the concept but some had biases.
Motivation & Procrastination
William Knaus estimates that 90% of students procrastinate, with 25% being chronic procrastinators. Chronic procrastinators are more likely to drop out of college. The document then discusses causes of procrastination, including using faulty thinking to justify behavior, being overwhelmed by large projects, poor time management, and perfectionist expectations. It suggests breaking large projects into smaller parts with deadlines and focusing on priority tasks to overcome procrastination.
Designing simulations and games_design tips and tricks
A presentation hosted by Lyr Lobo on Friday, March 18, 2011 at the Virtual Worlds Best Practices in Education.
Recommended
Creating a Virtuous Cycle - The Research and Design Feedback Loop
This document discusses the importance of an effective research and design feedback loop to create thoughtful and user-centered products. It outlines common pitfalls when research and design teams do not collaborate well, such as communicating findings, engaging with each other's work, and believing research results. It then provides a step-by-step "virtuous loop formula" to facilitate collaboration between research and design, including prioritizing research questions, jointly reviewing prototypes, evaluating findings together, and continuously revisiting questions and designs based on new insights. Following this process can help avoid reactive "patchwork" solutions and instead lead to thoughtful designs informed by user needs.
Graham Thomas - The Testers Toolbox - EuroSTAR 2010
EuroSTAR Software Testing Conference 2010 presentation on The Testers Toolbox by Graham Thomas. See more at: http://conference.eurostarsoftwaretesting.com/past-presentations/
Guerrilla (or Agile) Evaluation for Learning
Workplace Learning & Development professionals have a problem -- too often they don't get enough (or any) feedback on the efficacy of their designs. What can we do to fix that?
test_slides
The document summarizes the results of a think-aloud usability test of an idea sharing website. Key findings from the test included: 1) Many buttons were not distinguishable enough; 2) The descriptions and text in the "Add idea form" could be switched; and 3) The test confirmed how much was considered in the design. Errors noted were testing in a group room versus privately and assistants providing too much guidance. Overall, participants liked the concept but some had biases.
Motivation & Procrastination
William Knaus estimates that 90% of students procrastinate, with 25% being chronic procrastinators. Chronic procrastinators are more likely to drop out of college. The document then discusses causes of procrastination, including using faulty thinking to justify behavior, being overwhelmed by large projects, poor time management, and perfectionist expectations. It suggests breaking large projects into smaller parts with deadlines and focusing on priority tasks to overcome procrastination.
Designing simulations and games_design tips and tricks
A presentation hosted by Lyr Lobo on Friday, March 18, 2011 at the Virtual Worlds Best Practices in Education.
User Testing: Adapt to Fit Your Needs
EffectiveUI's Ari Weissman (Lead Experience Architect) and Lys Maitland (Senior Experience Planner) spoke at Denver Startup Week 2016. Discussion description:
Test early, test often.
It’s a mantra that’s been proven successful time and again when it comes to innovation and design. So why aren’t you doing it? In the start-up world, when everything is moving so quickly, it can be easy to overlook or postpone collecting feedback from real people because of cost, time, or lack of preparation. Don’t let those things stop you. Valid data can be captured cheaply, quickly, and with half-finished products and strategies.
This talk will cover:
What is user testing and why is it important
How to plan for user testing
What are ways to make testing cheaper
What are ways to make testing quicker
How to test with different fidelities of concept and design
How to collect data more frequently
Opportunities for getting the whole team engaged
What to do with the insights/outcomes of research
Software Testing Using Mindmap Technique
The document discusses how mind mapping can be used to make software testing more organized and effective by providing a visual way to plan test cases and strategies, document requirements, and report on testing in a lean way. It explains what mind mapping is, how to create mind maps, and specific ways they can be applied in testing like test planning, requirement analysis, and reporting. The document advocates for using mind maps instead of traditional documentation as they allow for more creative thinking, flexibility, and focus during the testing process.
Users are Losers! They’ll Like Whatever we Make! and Other Fallacies.
Presented at CodeMash 2013.
If this sounds familiar it is time to make big changes or look for a new job. Failing your users will only end badly. In this session we look at the assumptions that are all-too-often made about users, usability and the User Experience (UX). In response to each of these misguided statements Carol will provide a quick method you can conduct with little or no resources to debunk these myths.
Faster Usability Testing in an Agile World presented at Agile2011
The sheer speed of an Agile project can be frightening to even the most experienced UX practitioner. This talk covers testing in short, quick, repetitive sessions, without sacrificing quality. The presentation covers strategies and techniques that can be used for speeding up traditional usability testing, on-site, remote and Rapid Iterative Testing and Evaluation (RITE) methods. Topics from planning through analysis, and ways to provide useful and usable recommendations to the team will be covered.
Denver Startup Week 2019: Choosing a Direction Learning How to Test Ideas and...
As part of Denver's 2019 Startup Week, Crownpeak's Director of UX, Ari Weissman and Lys Maitland, Experience Research Manager at a national healthcare organization, presented a joint session on "Choosing a direction: Learning how to test ideas and designs."
Establishing best practices to improve usefulness and usability of web interf...
Establishing best practices to improve usefulness and usability of web interfaces providing atmospheric data.
Seda post its surveys vs focus groups vs ngt
The document summarizes the results of a workshop on evaluation techniques for teaching. The top five challenges identified were: 1) Evaluating the impact of educational development work, 2) Getting staff to attend sessions, 3) Recognizing the value of teaching within institutions, 4) Engaging staff who need the most development, and 5) Being pulled in too many directions. The document also compares the advantages and disadvantages of using nominal group techniques, surveys, and focus groups to evaluate teaching.
Rapid turnaround usability testing: not just a pipe dream
This document describes a method for rapid-turnaround usability testing that allows product teams to get customer feedback more quickly without the time and expense of traditional usability testing. Key aspects of the method include conducting short usability tests with 1-3 participants over 3 days, improvising tasks based on interviews with participants, debriefing with the product team immediately after each test, and revising prototypes based on findings within 2 weeks to start the next iteration. The rapid approach aims to keep product teams and decision makers aligned through involvement in testing and debriefing, and provides quick feedback to guide design iterations.
More Than Usability
This document discusses 7 methods for conducting user research: field studies, desirability studies, surveys and polls, usability studies, remote testing, A/B testing, and researching without users. It provides an overview of when each method should be used, how to implement it, and tips/tools for each. The document emphasizes that user research is important because designers are not users, and it should be conducted at different stages of the product development process to inform, optimize, and assess the user experience.
Pilot study
A pilot study is a small preliminary study conducted before a larger research study to test feasibility, reliability, and validity. It helps identify potential problems in design or methodology. Key reasons for conducting a pilot study include assessing the feasibility of processes, resources, human/data management, and scientific aspects like response and variance. Pilot studies allow researchers to test hypotheses, gain insights, and reduce risks of problems in the full study.
Denver Startup Week 2018: Just Enough Research
This document discusses approaches for conducting just enough product research with limited time and resources. It begins with establishing the importance of research for building inclusive, high-quality products. It then provides examples of quick qualitative and quantitative research methods like meeting with one customer per week and conducting moderated Kano sessions. The document also recommends facilitating internal feedback through sharing designs for comments. For synthesis, it suggests debriefing after sessions and using tools like empathy maps and rainbow sheets to identify themes. Finally, it proposes implementing passive user panel growth and tracking assumptions as a backlog for testing.
AS Unit 2 Student Guide
This document provides guidance for students on the Unit 2 Geographical Investigations exam. It includes an overview of the exam structure, advice on time management and fieldwork questions. Key points covered are:
- The exam consists of two questions based on the two topics studied, with no choice.
- Fieldwork, research and enquiry skills are core to the exam.
- Fieldwork questions are worth 15 marks and require the most time to think and organize a response focused on the specific question.
- A fieldwork audit and 'virtuous circle' of fully writing up fieldwork are recommended to best prepare for exam questions.
ConductingOnlineSurveys_Sue_ch1
An online survey can be a useful data collection method when the sample is large and geographically dispersed, the timeline is tight, the topic is sensitive, respondents have necessary technology, a sampling frame exists, a convenience sample is adequate, and staff capabilities allow for online survey design and administration. Key steps in the survey process include defining objectives, reviewing literature, pretesting the questionnaire, launching the survey, analyzing responses, and reporting findings. The advantages of online surveys include low cost, speed, and the ability to ask complex contingent questions, though coverage bias and survey fatigue are potential disadvantages.
2.1 Quant Intro
This document discusses quantitative research methods for museum projects. It covers when quantitative data is needed, such as for audience profiling, trends analysis, and reporting to funders. It also discusses common quantitative methods like interviews, surveys, and online/mail surveys. The document provides guidance on designing effective questionnaires, including determining what to ask, question wording and order, and sample sizes. It concludes with an exercise to design a questionnaire to understand usage of a museum coffee cart.
Introduction to Usability Testing for Survey Research
This document provides guidance on planning and preparing for usability testing of surveys. It discusses determining what aspects of a survey to test, who to recruit as participants, and where to conduct the testing. Key recommendations include deciding what to test at least a month before testing, recruiting 5-10 participants to represent intended users, and conducting testing in rounds with revisions between rounds rather than one large test. Locations for testing can either be at the organization conducting the test or in participants' natural environments.
Research Process
This document outlines the 8 key steps in the research process: 1) selecting a topic, 2) reviewing literature, 3) developing theoretical and conceptual frameworks, 4) clarifying the research question, 5) designing the research, 6) collecting data, 7) analyzing data, and 8) drawing conclusions. It provides details on each step, emphasizing that research involves systematically working through each interlinked step to effectively answer the research question.
AECT 2016 Multimedia
This experiment investigated the effectiveness of five different video design techniques on learning, perception of the instructor, and cognitive load. The designs included instructor-only, slides-only, video-switching between instructor and slides, dual windows with instructor and slides displayed simultaneously, and superimposed slides over the instructor video. The results showed no significant differences in learning outcomes between the designs. Designs including both the instructor and slides received higher ratings for instructor credibility and nonverbal immediacy. There were no significant differences found for general immediacy, cognitive load, or desired to continue the course. Future research could explore more interactive designs or varying the content difficulty.
Primary research methods presentation.
This document outlines various primary research methods that could be used for a project on non-wovens and composite materials for automotive parts. It discusses questionnaires, interviews, focus groups, surveys, observations, prototypes/experiments, and online research. The author indicates they will use questionnaires, focus groups, and prototypes as their main methods through triangulation. Questionnaires will gather technical data from experts, focus groups will provide different perspectives, and prototypes will allow testing ideas and identifying errors. Personal reflection on methods and a pilot study are also recommended to strengthen the research.
Open Design Research
This document discusses open and collaborative design research. It notes that academics tend to have slower but higher quality research while practitioners have faster but more variable quality research. The document proposes a collaborative model where researchers from both groups could work together openly online. This would allow for fast, high quality, practical research projects with opportunities for collaboration. Some potential issues with the model like intellectual property, quality control, and getting buy-in are also discussed.
Formative Evaluation for Educational Product Development
This document discusses formative evaluation for educational product development. Formative evaluation involves testing an educational product with users during development to inform the product's direction. It can be conducted at any time during development. Some key methods discussed include interviews, think-aloud protocols, focus groups, questionnaires, and click-testing. Conducting formative evaluation with target users for around a week can help identify usability issues, measure user appeal and engagement, and test user comprehension to improve the educational product.
Practical eLearning Makeovers for Everyone
Welcome to Practical eLearning Makeovers for Everyone. In this presentation, we’ll take a look at a bunch of easy-to-use visual design tips and tricks. And we’ll do this by using them to spruce up some eLearning screens that are in dire need of a new look.
More Related Content
Similar to User Centered Design Presentation
User Testing: Adapt to Fit Your Needs
EffectiveUI's Ari Weissman (Lead Experience Architect) and Lys Maitland (Senior Experience Planner) spoke at Denver Startup Week 2016. Discussion description:
Test early, test often.
It’s a mantra that’s been proven successful time and again when it comes to innovation and design. So why aren’t you doing it? In the start-up world, when everything is moving so quickly, it can be easy to overlook or postpone collecting feedback from real people because of cost, time, or lack of preparation. Don’t let those things stop you. Valid data can be captured cheaply, quickly, and with half-finished products and strategies.
This talk will cover:
What is user testing and why is it important
How to plan for user testing
What are ways to make testing cheaper
What are ways to make testing quicker
How to test with different fidelities of concept and design
How to collect data more frequently
Opportunities for getting the whole team engaged
What to do with the insights/outcomes of research
Software Testing Using Mindmap Technique
The document discusses how mind mapping can be used to make software testing more organized and effective by providing a visual way to plan test cases and strategies, document requirements, and report on testing in a lean way. It explains what mind mapping is, how to create mind maps, and specific ways they can be applied in testing like test planning, requirement analysis, and reporting. The document advocates for using mind maps instead of traditional documentation as they allow for more creative thinking, flexibility, and focus during the testing process.
Users are Losers! They’ll Like Whatever we Make! and Other Fallacies.
Presented at CodeMash 2013.
If this sounds familiar it is time to make big changes or look for a new job. Failing your users will only end badly. In this session we look at the assumptions that are all-too-often made about users, usability and the User Experience (UX). In response to each of these misguided statements Carol will provide a quick method you can conduct with little or no resources to debunk these myths.
Faster Usability Testing in an Agile World presented at Agile2011
The sheer speed of an Agile project can be frightening to even the most experienced UX practitioner. This talk covers testing in short, quick, repetitive sessions, without sacrificing quality. The presentation covers strategies and techniques that can be used for speeding up traditional usability testing, on-site, remote and Rapid Iterative Testing and Evaluation (RITE) methods. Topics from planning through analysis, and ways to provide useful and usable recommendations to the team will be covered.
Denver Startup Week 2019: Choosing a Direction Learning How to Test Ideas and...
As part of Denver's 2019 Startup Week, Crownpeak's Director of UX, Ari Weissman and Lys Maitland, Experience Research Manager at a national healthcare organization, presented a joint session on "Choosing a direction: Learning how to test ideas and designs."
Establishing best practices to improve usefulness and usability of web interf...
Establishing best practices to improve usefulness and usability of web interfaces providing atmospheric data.
Seda post its surveys vs focus groups vs ngt
The document summarizes the results of a workshop on evaluation techniques for teaching. The top five challenges identified were: 1) Evaluating the impact of educational development work, 2) Getting staff to attend sessions, 3) Recognizing the value of teaching within institutions, 4) Engaging staff who need the most development, and 5) Being pulled in too many directions. The document also compares the advantages and disadvantages of using nominal group techniques, surveys, and focus groups to evaluate teaching.
Rapid turnaround usability testing: not just a pipe dream
This document describes a method for rapid-turnaround usability testing that allows product teams to get customer feedback more quickly without the time and expense of traditional usability testing. Key aspects of the method include conducting short usability tests with 1-3 participants over 3 days, improvising tasks based on interviews with participants, debriefing with the product team immediately after each test, and revising prototypes based on findings within 2 weeks to start the next iteration. The rapid approach aims to keep product teams and decision makers aligned through involvement in testing and debriefing, and provides quick feedback to guide design iterations.
More Than Usability
This document discusses 7 methods for conducting user research: field studies, desirability studies, surveys and polls, usability studies, remote testing, A/B testing, and researching without users. It provides an overview of when each method should be used, how to implement it, and tips/tools for each. The document emphasizes that user research is important because designers are not users, and it should be conducted at different stages of the product development process to inform, optimize, and assess the user experience.
Pilot study
A pilot study is a small preliminary study conducted before a larger research study to test feasibility, reliability, and validity. It helps identify potential problems in design or methodology. Key reasons for conducting a pilot study include assessing the feasibility of processes, resources, human/data management, and scientific aspects like response and variance. Pilot studies allow researchers to test hypotheses, gain insights, and reduce risks of problems in the full study.
Denver Startup Week 2018: Just Enough Research
This document discusses approaches for conducting just enough product research with limited time and resources. It begins with establishing the importance of research for building inclusive, high-quality products. It then provides examples of quick qualitative and quantitative research methods like meeting with one customer per week and conducting moderated Kano sessions. The document also recommends facilitating internal feedback through sharing designs for comments. For synthesis, it suggests debriefing after sessions and using tools like empathy maps and rainbow sheets to identify themes. Finally, it proposes implementing passive user panel growth and tracking assumptions as a backlog for testing.
AS Unit 2 Student Guide
This document provides guidance for students on the Unit 2 Geographical Investigations exam. It includes an overview of the exam structure, advice on time management and fieldwork questions. Key points covered are:
- The exam consists of two questions based on the two topics studied, with no choice.
- Fieldwork, research and enquiry skills are core to the exam.
- Fieldwork questions are worth 15 marks and require the most time to think and organize a response focused on the specific question.
- A fieldwork audit and 'virtuous circle' of fully writing up fieldwork are recommended to best prepare for exam questions.
ConductingOnlineSurveys_Sue_ch1
An online survey can be a useful data collection method when the sample is large and geographically dispersed, the timeline is tight, the topic is sensitive, respondents have necessary technology, a sampling frame exists, a convenience sample is adequate, and staff capabilities allow for online survey design and administration. Key steps in the survey process include defining objectives, reviewing literature, pretesting the questionnaire, launching the survey, analyzing responses, and reporting findings. The advantages of online surveys include low cost, speed, and the ability to ask complex contingent questions, though coverage bias and survey fatigue are potential disadvantages.
2.1 Quant Intro
This document discusses quantitative research methods for museum projects. It covers when quantitative data is needed, such as for audience profiling, trends analysis, and reporting to funders. It also discusses common quantitative methods like interviews, surveys, and online/mail surveys. The document provides guidance on designing effective questionnaires, including determining what to ask, question wording and order, and sample sizes. It concludes with an exercise to design a questionnaire to understand usage of a museum coffee cart.
Introduction to Usability Testing for Survey Research
This document provides guidance on planning and preparing for usability testing of surveys. It discusses determining what aspects of a survey to test, who to recruit as participants, and where to conduct the testing. Key recommendations include deciding what to test at least a month before testing, recruiting 5-10 participants to represent intended users, and conducting testing in rounds with revisions between rounds rather than one large test. Locations for testing can either be at the organization conducting the test or in participants' natural environments.
Research Process
This document outlines the 8 key steps in the research process: 1) selecting a topic, 2) reviewing literature, 3) developing theoretical and conceptual frameworks, 4) clarifying the research question, 5) designing the research, 6) collecting data, 7) analyzing data, and 8) drawing conclusions. It provides details on each step, emphasizing that research involves systematically working through each interlinked step to effectively answer the research question.
AECT 2016 Multimedia
This experiment investigated the effectiveness of five different video design techniques on learning, perception of the instructor, and cognitive load. The designs included instructor-only, slides-only, video-switching between instructor and slides, dual windows with instructor and slides displayed simultaneously, and superimposed slides over the instructor video. The results showed no significant differences in learning outcomes between the designs. Designs including both the instructor and slides received higher ratings for instructor credibility and nonverbal immediacy. There were no significant differences found for general immediacy, cognitive load, or desired to continue the course. Future research could explore more interactive designs or varying the content difficulty.
Primary research methods presentation.
This document outlines various primary research methods that could be used for a project on non-wovens and composite materials for automotive parts. It discusses questionnaires, interviews, focus groups, surveys, observations, prototypes/experiments, and online research. The author indicates they will use questionnaires, focus groups, and prototypes as their main methods through triangulation. Questionnaires will gather technical data from experts, focus groups will provide different perspectives, and prototypes will allow testing ideas and identifying errors. Personal reflection on methods and a pilot study are also recommended to strengthen the research.
Open Design Research
This document discusses open and collaborative design research. It notes that academics tend to have slower but higher quality research while practitioners have faster but more variable quality research. The document proposes a collaborative model where researchers from both groups could work together openly online. This would allow for fast, high quality, practical research projects with opportunities for collaboration. Some potential issues with the model like intellectual property, quality control, and getting buy-in are also discussed.
Formative Evaluation for Educational Product Development
This document discusses formative evaluation for educational product development. Formative evaluation involves testing an educational product with users during development to inform the product's direction. It can be conducted at any time during development. Some key methods discussed include interviews, think-aloud protocols, focus groups, questionnaires, and click-testing. Conducting formative evaluation with target users for around a week can help identify usability issues, measure user appeal and engagement, and test user comprehension to improve the educational product.
Similar to User Centered Design Presentation (20)
Users are Losers! They’ll Like Whatever we Make! and Other Fallacies.
Users are Losers! They’ll Like Whatever we Make! and Other Fallacies.
Faster Usability Testing in an Agile World presented at Agile2011
Faster Usability Testing in an Agile World presented at Agile2011
Denver Startup Week 2019: Choosing a Direction Learning How to Test Ideas and...
Denver Startup Week 2019: Choosing a Direction Learning How to Test Ideas and...
Establishing best practices to improve usefulness and usability of web interf...
Establishing best practices to improve usefulness and usability of web interf...
Rapid turnaround usability testing: not just a pipe dream
Rapid turnaround usability testing: not just a pipe dream
Introduction to Usability Testing for Survey Research
Introduction to Usability Testing for Survey Research
Formative Evaluation for Educational Product Development
Formative Evaluation for Educational Product Development
Recently uploaded
Practical eLearning Makeovers for Everyone
Welcome to Practical eLearning Makeovers for Everyone. In this presentation, we’ll take a look at a bunch of easy-to-use visual design tips and tricks. And we’ll do this by using them to spruce up some eLearning screens that are in dire need of a new look.
ARENA - Young adults in the workplace (Knight Moves).pdf
Presentations of Bavo Raeymaekers (Project lead youth unemployment at the City of Antwerp), Suzan Martens (Service designer at Knight Moves) and Adriaan De Keersmaeker (Community manager at Talk to C)
during the 'Arena • Young adults in the workplace' conference hosted by Knight Moves.
Revolutionizing the Digital Landscape: Web Development Companies in India
Discover unparalleled creativity and technical prowess with India's leading web development companies. From custom solutions to e-commerce platforms, harness the expertise of skilled developers at competitive prices. Transform your digital presence, enhance the user experience, and propel your business to new heights with innovative solutions tailored to your needs, all from the heart of India's tech industry.
Timeless Principles of Good Design
Timeless Principles of Good Design from my 2015 Presentation at TYPO SF
Maximize Your Content with Beautiful Assets : Content & Asset for Landing Page
Figma is a cloud-based design tool widely used by designers for prototyping, UI/UX design, and real-time collaboration. With features such as precision pen tools, grid system, and reusable components, Figma makes it easy for teams to work together on design projects. Its flexibility and accessibility make Figma a top choice in the digital age.
Technoblade The Legacy of a Minecraft Legend.
Technoblade, born Alex on June 1, 1999, was a legendary Minecraft YouTuber known for his sharp wit and exceptional PvP skills. Starting his channel in 2013, he gained nearly 11 million subscribers. His private battle with metastatic sarcoma ended in June 2022, but his enduring legacy continues to inspire millions.
一比一原版(UW毕业证)西雅图华盛顿大学毕业证如何办理
UW毕业证学历书【微信95270640】做UW文凭、办UW文凭、买UW文凭Q微信95270640买办国外文凭UW毕业证买学历咨询/代办美国毕业证成绩单文凭、办澳洲文凭毕业证、办加拿大大学毕业证文凭英国毕业证学历认证-毕业证文凭成绩单、假文凭假毕业证假学历书制作仿制、改成绩、教育部学历学位认证、毕业证、成绩单、文 凭、UW学历文凭、UW假学位证书、毕业证文凭、、文凭毕业证、毕业证认证、留服认证、使馆认证、使馆证明 、使馆留学回国人员证明、留学生认证、学历认证、文凭认证、学位认证
(诚招代理)办理国外高校毕业证成绩单文凭学位证,真实使馆公证（留学回国人员证明）真实留信网认证国外学历学位认证雅思代考国外学校代申请名校保录开请假条改GPA改成绩ID卡
1.高仿业务:【本科硕士】毕业证,成绩单（GPA修改）,学历认证（教育部认证）,大学Offer,,ID,留信认证,使馆认证,雅思,语言证书等高仿类证书；
2.认证服务: 学历认证（教育部认证）,大使馆认证（回国人员证明）,留信认证（可查有编号证书）,大学保录取,雅思保分成绩单。
3.技术服务：钢印水印烫金激光防伪凹凸版设计印刷激凸温感光标底纹镭射速度快。
办理西雅图华盛顿大学西雅图华盛顿大学毕业证假文凭流程：
1客户提供办理信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
-办理真实使馆公证（即留学回国人员证明）
-办理各国各大学文凭（世界名校一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度）
-全套服务：毕业证成绩单真实使馆公证真实教育部认证。让您回国发展信心十足！
（详情请加一下 文凭顾问+微信:95270640）欢迎咨询！实伙伴平时山娃上学阿黑也摇头晃脑地跟去暑假用不着上学阿黑更是天天围着山娃转山娃上山除了察看埋下的野兽铁夹子看护早上逐上山的大黄牛外也觅着采草药摘红菇积攒起来拿到镇上卖山娃知道母亲身体不好家里盖新房也欠了不少钱总想趁假期赚点钱在校寄宿时用不着老向爷爷奶奶要盛夏的乡村仍旧清凉清清爽爽的山娃也过得自由自在不知为啥山娃总情不自禁地思念起城里的父亲每年暑假瞅见远乡近邻的小伙伴都争先恐后地往城里跑山娃就更思片
Connect Conference 2022: Passive House - Economic and Environmental Solution...
Passive House: The Economic and Environmental Solution for Sustainable Real Estate. Lecture by Tim Eian of TE Studio Passive House Design in November 2022 in Minneapolis.
- The Built Environment
- Let's imagine the perfect building
- The Passive House standard
- Why Passive House targets
- Clean Energy Plans?!
- How does Passive House compare and fit in?
- The business case for Passive House real estate
- Tools to quantify the value of Passive House
- What can I do?
- Resources
Impact of Fonts: in Web and Apps Design
Fonts play a crucial role in both User Interface (UI) and User Experience (UX) design. They affect readability, accessibility, aesthetics, and overall user perception.
一比一原版(LSBU毕业证书)伦敦南岸大学毕业证如何办理
学校原件一模一样【微信：6496090 】【(LSBU毕业证书)伦敦南岸大学毕业证成绩单】【微信：6496090 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微6496090
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微6496090】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微6496090】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理(LSBU毕业证书)伦敦南岸大学毕业证【微信：6496090 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理(LSBU毕业证书)伦敦南岸大学毕业证【微信：6496090 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理(LSBU毕业证书)伦敦南岸大学毕业证【微信：6496090 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理(LSBU毕业证书)伦敦南岸大学毕业证【微信：6496090 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
International Upcycling Research Network advisory board meeting 4
Slides used for the International Upcycling Research Network advisory board 4 (last one). The project is based at De Montfort University in Leicester, UK, and funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council.
UNIT V ACTIONS AND COMMANDS, FORMS AND CONTROLS.pptx
Actions and Commands:
Tap, Swipe, and Pinch
Rotate and Shake -Buttons -Menu Bars – Menus
Toolbars - Links- Action Panels
Hover Tools - Keyboard Actions- Drag-and-Drop
Typed Commands-Affordance-Direct Manipulation.
Forms and Controls:
Basics of Form Design
Patterns.
Game Concept Presentation for Ukrainian Mythology Based Game With Designs
The Game Concept created as a Final Project piece for college. Creative Media year 2 student
Heuristics Evaluation - How to Guide.pdf
This guide helps identify potential issues related to navigation, clarity, consistency, and other factors that can affect user experience.
Storytelling For The Web: Integrate Storytelling in your Design Process
In this slides I explain how I have used storytelling techniques to elevate websites and brands and create memorable user experiences. You can discover practical tips as I showcase the elements of good storytelling and its applied to some examples of diverse brands/projects..
PDF SubmissionDigital Marketing Institute in Noida
https://www.safalta.com/online-digital-marketing/advance-digital-marketing-training-in-noidaTop Digital Marketing Institute in Noida: Boost Your Career Fast
[3:29 am, 30/05/2024] +91 83818 43552: Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida also provides advanced classes for individuals seeking to develop their expertise and skills in this field. These classes, led by industry experts with vast experience, focus on specific aspects of digital marketing such as advanced SEO strategies, sophisticated content creation techniques, and data-driven analytics.
哪里办理美国中央华盛顿大学毕业证双学位证书原版一模一样
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【美国中央华盛顿大学毕业证双学位证书】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Recently uploaded (20)
ARENA - Young adults in the workplace (Knight Moves).pdf
ARENA - Young adults in the workplace (Knight Moves).pdf
Revolutionizing the Digital Landscape: Web Development Companies in India
Revolutionizing the Digital Landscape: Web Development Companies in India
Maximize Your Content with Beautiful Assets : Content & Asset for Landing Page
Maximize Your Content with Beautiful Assets : Content & Asset for Landing Page
Connect Conference 2022: Passive House - Economic and Environmental Solution...
Connect Conference 2022: Passive House - Economic and Environmental Solution...
International Upcycling Research Network advisory board meeting 4
International Upcycling Research Network advisory board meeting 4
UNIT V ACTIONS AND COMMANDS, FORMS AND CONTROLS.pptx
UNIT V ACTIONS AND COMMANDS, FORMS AND CONTROLS.pptx
Game Concept Presentation for Ukrainian Mythology Based Game With Designs
Game Concept Presentation for Ukrainian Mythology Based Game With Designs
Storytelling For The Web: Integrate Storytelling in your Design Process
Storytelling For The Web: Integrate Storytelling in your Design Process
PDF SubmissionDigital Marketing Institute in Noida
PDF SubmissionDigital Marketing Institute in Noida
User Centered Design Presentation
- 1. Dinu Chacko Michael Dawson Sean Everett Elizabeth Freeman Usability of the DIGITAL MEDIA Website
- 2. PURPOSE
- 3. Phase 1 - Card Sorting Technique METHOD
- 4. Phase 2 - Prototype Testing METHOD
- 5. ❏ Mann-Whitney test was used in SPSS to analyze the medians. ❏ P-values were used to reject or accept the null hypothesis. ❏ Some individual tasks were easier to navigate on the prototype website than on the current website. ❏ Outliers and failures ANALYSIS
- 6. ANALYSIS
- 7. ANALYSIS
- 8. Neither website was consistently faster overall. Focus on the individual tasks and change the ones that were significantly different. Human error could have played a part in stopping and recording the time. Discussion
- 13. DISCUSSION
- 14. DISCUSSION
- 15. DISCUSSION
- 16. DISCUSSION
- 17. ADVANTAGES
- 18. ADVANTAGES
- 19. ADVANTAGES
- 20. ADVANTAGES
- 21. ADVANTAGES
- 23. Larger sample size. Collecting qualitative data. RECOMMENDATIONS
- 24. Standardized prototype construction. Time for reviewing the qualitative data. Time for conducting tests and getting participants. Recommendations
- 25. OUR FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Change the Explore Courses page so that it includes when and the class is offered. 2. Divide the Current Students page into Sugar Land Resources, Main Campus Resources, and Class Resources. 3. Merge the content from Instructional Materials into the newly created Class Resources. 4. Move the library resource guide to the Class Resources page. 5. Merge the content from Areas of Emphasis pages to BS in Digital Media using Ashley’s submenu. 6. Move Orientation Modules to the Prospective Students submenu. 7. Move Contact Us to the main menu (previously an option in a drop-down). 8. In Explore Courses, add the 2 non-DIGM classes to the emphasis when searching.