The document analyzes and ranks US states based on various energy consumption metrics from 2004. It provides data on each state's ranking for industrial energy consumption as a percentage of total, total energy consumption per capita, primary fuels used for electricity generation, and rankings for economic and demographic factors like median income and age. Louisiana had the highest percentage of energy consumption by the industrial sector, while Wyoming had the second highest consumption per capita. States relied primarily on coal, natural gas, and nuclear power for electricity generation.
Pesquisa - Equipamentos para transmissão e distribuição de energia [Revista O...atitudeeditorial
Linhão de Belo Monte deve aquecer setor de transmissão
Levantamento da Abinee afirma dependência do mercado de GTD de encomendas de leilões de transmissão e de geração. Já os agentes do setor de distribuição continuam apreensivos
Pesquisa - Equipamentos para transmissão e distribuição de energia [Revista O...atitudeeditorial
Linhão de Belo Monte deve aquecer setor de transmissão
Levantamento da Abinee afirma dependência do mercado de GTD de encomendas de leilões de transmissão e de geração. Já os agentes do setor de distribuição continuam apreensivos
Republican Leaning States With ResourcesBruce LaCour
States that have voted for Republican candidate for president at least 8 out of last ten elections have the majority of United States resources. As conditions worsen in the big cities and the realization that the welfare state is bankrupt beyond repair, splitting with the rest of the states is a definite future possibility.
The global market for revenues from electronic waste materials recycling is projected to grow from $8.5 billion in 2009 to nearly $13 billion in 2014, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.9%.The fastest-growing segment of the E-waste market is recycled plastics, valued at $976 million in 2009 and projected to reach $1.6 billion by 2014, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10%.
Linking the energy crisis with climate change, Ritu Mathu, TERI University, I...ESD UNU-IAS
This lecture is part of the 2016 ProSPER.Net Young Researchers’ School on sustainable energy for transforming lives: availability, accessibility, affordability
Datamonitor's Electricity: Global Industry Guide is an essential resource for top-level data and analysis covering the Electricity industry. It includes detailed data on market size and segmentation, textual analysis of the key trends and competitive landscape, and profiles of the leading companies. This incisive report provides expert analysis on a global, regional and country basis.Scope of the Report * Contains an executive summary and data on value, volume and segmentation * Provides textual analysis of the industry's prospects, competitive landscape and profiles of the leading companies* Incorporates in-depth five forces competitive environment analysis and scorecards * Covers the Global, European and Asia-Pacific markets as well as individual chapters on 5 major markets (France, Germany, Japan, the UK and the US). * Includes a five-year forecast of the industryHighlightsThe global electricity market grew by 2.1% in 2009 to reach a value of $1,601.6 billion.In 2014, the global electricity market is forecast to have a value of $2,693.2 billion, an increase of 68.2% since 2009.The global electricity market shrank by 0.7% in 2009 to reach a volume of 15,302.5 Twh (Terawatt-hour).In 2014, the global electricity market is forecast to have a volume of 19,908.5 Twh (Terawatt-hour), an increase of 30.1% since 2009.Industry is the largest segment of the global electricity market, accounting for 37.9% of the market's total value.Asia-Pacific accounts for 40.4% of the global electricity market value.China Southern Power Grid is the leading player in the global electricity market, generating a 12.2% share of the market's volume.Rivalry in the global electricity market is moderate overall, although country-to-country variations are considerable. Why you should buy this report * Spot future trends and developments * Inform your business decisions * Add weight to presentations and marketing materials * Save time carrying out entry-level researchMarket DefinitionThe electricity market consists of the sale of electricity to industrial, commercial, household, transportation, and other end-users, including agricultural. The volume of the market is calculated as the total volume of electricity consumed (in billions of kilowatt hours, kWh), and the market value has been calculated according to average annual electricity prices. Note that 1 TWh is identical to 1 billion kWh, or 1 million MWh. Market shares are calculated on the basis of retail sales to end-users in all segments. Any currency conversions used in the creation of this report have been calculated using constant 2009 annual average exchange rates.
Republican Leaning States With ResourcesBruce LaCour
States that have voted for Republican candidate for president at least 8 out of last ten elections have the majority of United States resources. As conditions worsen in the big cities and the realization that the welfare state is bankrupt beyond repair, splitting with the rest of the states is a definite future possibility.
The global market for revenues from electronic waste materials recycling is projected to grow from $8.5 billion in 2009 to nearly $13 billion in 2014, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.9%.The fastest-growing segment of the E-waste market is recycled plastics, valued at $976 million in 2009 and projected to reach $1.6 billion by 2014, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10%.
Linking the energy crisis with climate change, Ritu Mathu, TERI University, I...ESD UNU-IAS
This lecture is part of the 2016 ProSPER.Net Young Researchers’ School on sustainable energy for transforming lives: availability, accessibility, affordability
Datamonitor's Electricity: Global Industry Guide is an essential resource for top-level data and analysis covering the Electricity industry. It includes detailed data on market size and segmentation, textual analysis of the key trends and competitive landscape, and profiles of the leading companies. This incisive report provides expert analysis on a global, regional and country basis.Scope of the Report * Contains an executive summary and data on value, volume and segmentation * Provides textual analysis of the industry's prospects, competitive landscape and profiles of the leading companies* Incorporates in-depth five forces competitive environment analysis and scorecards * Covers the Global, European and Asia-Pacific markets as well as individual chapters on 5 major markets (France, Germany, Japan, the UK and the US). * Includes a five-year forecast of the industryHighlightsThe global electricity market grew by 2.1% in 2009 to reach a value of $1,601.6 billion.In 2014, the global electricity market is forecast to have a value of $2,693.2 billion, an increase of 68.2% since 2009.The global electricity market shrank by 0.7% in 2009 to reach a volume of 15,302.5 Twh (Terawatt-hour).In 2014, the global electricity market is forecast to have a volume of 19,908.5 Twh (Terawatt-hour), an increase of 30.1% since 2009.Industry is the largest segment of the global electricity market, accounting for 37.9% of the market's total value.Asia-Pacific accounts for 40.4% of the global electricity market value.China Southern Power Grid is the leading player in the global electricity market, generating a 12.2% share of the market's volume.Rivalry in the global electricity market is moderate overall, although country-to-country variations are considerable. Why you should buy this report * Spot future trends and developments * Inform your business decisions * Add weight to presentations and marketing materials * Save time carrying out entry-level researchMarket DefinitionThe electricity market consists of the sale of electricity to industrial, commercial, household, transportation, and other end-users, including agricultural. The volume of the market is calculated as the total volume of electricity consumed (in billions of kilowatt hours, kWh), and the market value has been calculated according to average annual electricity prices. Note that 1 TWh is identical to 1 billion kWh, or 1 million MWh. Market shares are calculated on the basis of retail sales to end-users in all segments. Any currency conversions used in the creation of this report have been calculated using constant 2009 annual average exchange rates.
Waste heat recovery dynamics an analogy of electricity generation & emiss...Arya Jena
This blog concentrates on discussing the untapped energy potential in waste heat recovery in Industries in India. And it's potential benefits in achieving energy efficiency, negawatt (Negative Watt) capacity addition and positive impact on the environment.
Study on Implementation of LED Lights for Industrial Lighting to optimize pow...Rahmatul Alam Ivan
World requires optimization in every sectors of energy utilization to decrease natural resource consumption in an industrial sector and other end user sectors. For an efficient and optimized industrial power management system, optimized lighting power sector will be a key fact. This comprehensive and contemporary study shows a path towards optimization of lighting power utilizing LEDs and some optimized proposals for the industries. It will make an impact over traditional Lighting power consumption. It will help to compare the current lighting standards utilized in an industry.
Similar to US Energy Consumption by State as of 2005 (20)
The Petrochemical Industry Can No Longer Guarantee Permanent EmploymentBruce LaCour
We are in a economic transition where economic growth will slow significantly and competition will increase in all economic arenas.
No company can promise permanent employment under these circumstances. All you can promise is that if everyone performs at maximum ability, then they will be compensated according to their contribution to the overall operation, as long as it lasts. Anything else is a fairy tale, and the time for Baby Boomer generated fairy tales is over.
Future Trends - Recycling - Demolished Construction MaterialsBruce LaCour
This transition where many essentials become less abundant and more expensive won’t be accepted as permanent by many; however, those that make the transition swiftly will quickly move to many areas of recycling. These will be some of the business survivors I have referred to in earlier articles. One of the biggest recycling movements will be deconstruction and using recovered materials for different uses.
Part of the future of recycling will be innovative efforts to use the recycled materials. The trash-throw-away society has to make the transition from the Age of Growth into the Age of Survival before that happens to any great extent. The younger generations will lead the way once they realize the past cannot be revived.
Recycling electrical wire may not be a multi-million dollar market in the future, but it will be a living!
Even if the value of recycled glass increased in the future, there would still be the technical problem of separating glass from other recyclables at the Material Recovery Center. If glass ever becomes a significant recyclable, it will be done by companies that specialize in collecting and recycling glass separately from the bulk of the trash generated by the trash society.
Future Trends - Recycling - Metals - Part IBruce LaCour
Mining has to return to the United States. The U.S. is not just running low on economically recoverable oil and gas, but also vital minerals at an even faster rate.
The U.S. Baby Boomer mirage has been kept the importers of “stuff” into the United States with positive trade deficits happy. That is coming to an end.
Future Trends - Recycling - Material Recycling FacilitiesBruce LaCour
Eventually, non-organic waste will be a big business, and recycling will be one of the ways to recover the cost of creating, collecting, and sorting the waste created by communities. The launching point for this business will be the Material Recovery Facility.
how to swap pi coins to foreign currency withdrawable.DOT TECH
As of my last update, Pi is still in the testing phase and is not tradable on any exchanges.
However, Pi Network has announced plans to launch its Testnet and Mainnet in the future, which may include listing Pi on exchanges.
The current method for selling pi coins involves exchanging them with a pi vendor who purchases pi coins for investment reasons.
If you want to sell your pi coins, reach out to a pi vendor and sell them to anyone looking to sell pi coins from any country around the globe.
Below is the contact information for my personal pi vendor.
Telegram: @Pi_vendor_247
Falcon stands out as a top-tier P2P Invoice Discounting platform in India, bridging esteemed blue-chip companies and eager investors. Our goal is to transform the investment landscape in India by establishing a comprehensive destination for borrowers and investors with diverse profiles and needs, all while minimizing risk. What sets Falcon apart is the elimination of intermediaries such as commercial banks and depository institutions, allowing investors to enjoy higher yields.
USDA Loans in California: A Comprehensive Overview.pptxmarketing367770
USDA Loans in California: A Comprehensive Overview
If you're dreaming of owning a home in California's rural or suburban areas, a USDA loan might be the perfect solution. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) offers these loans to help low-to-moderate-income individuals and families achieve homeownership.
Key Features of USDA Loans:
Zero Down Payment: USDA loans require no down payment, making homeownership more accessible.
Competitive Interest Rates: These loans often come with lower interest rates compared to conventional loans.
Flexible Credit Requirements: USDA loans have more lenient credit score requirements, helping those with less-than-perfect credit.
Guaranteed Loan Program: The USDA guarantees a portion of the loan, reducing risk for lenders and expanding borrowing options.
Eligibility Criteria:
Location: The property must be located in a USDA-designated rural or suburban area. Many areas in California qualify.
Income Limits: Applicants must meet income guidelines, which vary by region and household size.
Primary Residence: The home must be used as the borrower's primary residence.
Application Process:
Find a USDA-Approved Lender: Not all lenders offer USDA loans, so it's essential to choose one approved by the USDA.
Pre-Qualification: Determine your eligibility and the amount you can borrow.
Property Search: Look for properties in eligible rural or suburban areas.
Loan Application: Submit your application, including financial and personal information.
Processing and Approval: The lender and USDA will review your application. If approved, you can proceed to closing.
USDA loans are an excellent option for those looking to buy a home in California's rural and suburban areas. With no down payment and flexible requirements, these loans make homeownership more attainable for many families. Explore your eligibility today and take the first step toward owning your dream home.
how can I sell pi coins after successfully completing KYCDOT TECH
Pi coins is not launched yet in any exchange 💱 this means it's not swappable, the current pi displaying on coin market cap is the iou version of pi. And you can learn all about that on my previous post.
RIGHT NOW THE ONLY WAY you can sell pi coins is through verified pi merchants. A pi merchant is someone who buys pi coins and resell them to exchanges and crypto whales. Looking forward to hold massive quantities of pi coins before the mainnet launch.
This is because pi network is not doing any pre-sale or ico offerings, the only way to get my coins is from buying from miners. So a merchant facilitates the transactions between the miners and these exchanges holding pi.
I and my friends has sold more than 6000 pi coins successfully with this method. I will be happy to share the contact of my personal pi merchant. The one i trade with, if you have your own merchant you can trade with them. For those who are new.
Message: @Pi_vendor_247 on telegram.
I wouldn't advise you selling all percentage of the pi coins. Leave at least a before so its a win win during open mainnet. Have a nice day pioneers ♥️
#kyc #mainnet #picoins #pi #sellpi #piwallet
#pinetwork
If you are looking for a pi coin investor. Then look no further because I have the right one he is a pi vendor (he buy and resell to whales in China). I met him on a crypto conference and ever since I and my friends have sold more than 10k pi coins to him And he bought all and still want more. I will drop his telegram handle below just send him a message.
@Pi_vendor_247
The European Unemployment Puzzle: implications from population agingGRAPE
We study the link between the evolving age structure of the working population and unemployment. We build a large new Keynesian OLG model with a realistic age structure, labor market frictions, sticky prices, and aggregate shocks. Once calibrated to the European economy, we quantify the extent to which demographic changes over the last three decades have contributed to the decline of the unemployment rate. Our findings yield important implications for the future evolution of unemployment given the anticipated further aging of the working population in Europe. We also quantify the implications for optimal monetary policy: lowering inflation volatility becomes less costly in terms of GDP and unemployment volatility, which hints that optimal monetary policy may be more hawkish in an aging society. Finally, our results also propose a partial reversal of the European-US unemployment puzzle due to the fact that the share of young workers is expected to remain robust in the US.
how to sell pi coins effectively (from 50 - 100k pi)DOT TECH
Anywhere in the world, including Africa, America, and Europe, you can sell Pi Network Coins online and receive cash through online payment options.
Pi has not yet been launched on any exchange because we are currently using the confined Mainnet. The planned launch date for Pi is June 28, 2026.
Reselling to investors who want to hold until the mainnet launch in 2026 is currently the sole way to sell.
Consequently, right now. All you need to do is select the right pi network provider.
Who is a pi merchant?
An individual who buys coins from miners on the pi network and resells them to investors hoping to hang onto them until the mainnet is launched is known as a pi merchant.
debuts.
I'll provide you the Telegram username
@Pi_vendor_247
how to sell pi coins on Bitmart crypto exchangeDOT TECH
Yes. Pi network coins can be exchanged but not on bitmart exchange. Because pi network is still in the enclosed mainnet. The only way pioneers are able to trade pi coins is by reselling the pi coins to pi verified merchants.
A verified merchant is someone who buys pi network coins and resell it to exchanges looking forward to hold till mainnet launch.
I will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi merchant to trade with.
@Pi_vendor_247
What price will pi network be listed on exchangesDOT TECH
The rate at which pi will be listed is practically unknown. But due to speculations surrounding it the predicted rate is tends to be from 30$ — 50$.
So if you are interested in selling your pi network coins at a high rate tho. Or you can't wait till the mainnet launch in 2026. You can easily trade your pi coins with a merchant.
A merchant is someone who buys pi coins from miners and resell them to Investors looking forward to hold massive quantities till mainnet launch.
I will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi vendor to trade with.
@Pi_vendor_247
US Economic Outlook - Being Decided - M Capital Group August 2021.pdfpchutichetpong
The U.S. economy is continuing its impressive recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and not slowing down despite re-occurring bumps. The U.S. savings rate reached its highest ever recorded level at 34% in April 2020 and Americans seem ready to spend. The sectors that had been hurt the most by the pandemic specifically reduced consumer spending, like retail, leisure, hospitality, and travel, are now experiencing massive growth in revenue and job openings.
Could this growth lead to a “Roaring Twenties”? As quickly as the U.S. economy contracted, experiencing a 9.1% drop in economic output relative to the business cycle in Q2 2020, the largest in recorded history, it has rebounded beyond expectations. This surprising growth seems to be fueled by the U.S. government’s aggressive fiscal and monetary policies, and an increase in consumer spending as mobility restrictions are lifted. Unemployment rates between June 2020 and June 2021 decreased by 5.2%, while the demand for labor is increasing, coupled with increasing wages to incentivize Americans to rejoin the labor force. Schools and businesses are expected to fully reopen soon. In parallel, vaccination rates across the country and the world continue to rise, with full vaccination rates of 50% and 14.8% respectively.
However, it is not completely smooth sailing from here. According to M Capital Group, the main risks that threaten the continued growth of the U.S. economy are inflation, unsettled trade relations, and another wave of Covid-19 mutations that could shut down the world again. Have we learned from the past year of COVID-19 and adapted our economy accordingly?
“In order for the U.S. economy to continue growing, whether there is another wave or not, the U.S. needs to focus on diversifying supply chains, supporting business investment, and maintaining consumer spending,” says Grace Feeley, a research analyst at M Capital Group.
While the economic indicators are positive, the risks are coming closer to manifesting and threatening such growth. The new variants spreading throughout the world, Delta, Lambda, and Gamma, are vaccine-resistant and muddy the predictions made about the economy and health of the country. These variants bring back the feeling of uncertainty that has wreaked havoc not only on the stock market but the mindset of people around the world. MCG provides unique insight on how to mitigate these risks to possibly ensure a bright economic future.
Currently pi network is not tradable on binance or any other exchange because we are still in the enclosed mainnet.
Right now the only way to sell pi coins is by trading with a verified merchant.
What is a pi merchant?
A pi merchant is someone verified by pi network team and allowed to barter pi coins for goods and services.
Since pi network is not doing any pre-sale The only way exchanges like binance/huobi or crypto whales can get pi is by buying from miners. And a merchant stands in between the exchanges and the miners.
I will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi merchant. I and my friends has traded more than 6000pi coins successfully
Tele-gram
@Pi_vendor_247
BYD SWOT Analysis and In-Depth Insights 2024.pptxmikemetalprod
Indepth analysis of the BYD 2024
BYD (Build Your Dreams) is a Chinese automaker and battery manufacturer that has snowballed over the past two decades to become a significant player in electric vehicles and global clean energy technology.
This SWOT analysis examines BYD's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats as it competes in the fast-changing automotive and energy storage industries.
Founded in 1995 and headquartered in Shenzhen, BYD started as a battery company before expanding into automobiles in the early 2000s.
Initially manufacturing gasoline-powered vehicles, BYD focused on plug-in hybrid and fully electric vehicles, leveraging its expertise in battery technology.
Today, BYD is the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer, delivering over 1.2 million electric cars globally. The company also produces electric buses, trucks, forklifts, and rail transit.
On the energy side, BYD is a major supplier of rechargeable batteries for cell phones, laptops, electric vehicles, and energy storage systems.
how to sell pi coins in South Korea profitably.DOT TECH
Yes. You can sell your pi network coins in South Korea or any other country, by finding a verified pi merchant
What is a verified pi merchant?
Since pi network is not launched yet on any exchange, the only way you can sell pi coins is by selling to a verified pi merchant, and this is because pi network is not launched yet on any exchange and no pre-sale or ico offerings Is done on pi.
Since there is no pre-sale, the only way exchanges can get pi is by buying from miners. So a pi merchant facilitates these transactions by acting as a bridge for both transactions.
How can i find a pi vendor/merchant?
Well for those who haven't traded with a pi merchant or who don't already have one. I will leave the telegram id of my personal pi merchant who i trade pi with.
Tele gram: @Pi_vendor_247
#pi #sell #nigeria #pinetwork #picoins #sellpi #Nigerian #tradepi #pinetworkcoins #sellmypi
Abhay Bhutada Leads Poonawalla Fincorp To Record Low NPA And Unprecedented Gr...Vighnesh Shashtri
Under the leadership of Abhay Bhutada, Poonawalla Fincorp has achieved record-low Non-Performing Assets (NPA) and witnessed unprecedented growth. Bhutada's strategic vision and effective management have significantly enhanced the company's financial health, showcasing a robust performance in the financial sector. This achievement underscores the company's resilience and ability to thrive in a competitive market, setting a new benchmark for operational excellence in the industry.
Abhay Bhutada Leads Poonawalla Fincorp To Record Low NPA And Unprecedented Gr...
US Energy Consumption by State as of 2005
1. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
1 LOUISIANA 3 63.3 23 24 22
OIL, NATURAL
GAS,
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR,
AND
PETROCHEM 18 2
NATURAL
GAS
(47.0%)
COAL
(24.9%)
NUCLEAR
(16.9%) 33 38 4 49 42 51 43 51
2 WYOMING 2 56.2 50 1 49
OIL, NATURAL
GAS,
URANIUM,
AND COAL 5 0
COAL
(95.1%) 3 48 20 24 10 15 30 9
3 TEXAS 5 53.5 29 16 2
OIL, NATURAL
GAS, COAL,
PETROCHEM,
URANIUM,
NUCLEAR,
ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
AND WIND
ENERGY 25 2
NATURAL
GAS
(49.4%)
COAL
(37.4%)
NUCLEAR
(9.6%) 37 28 18 29 50 28 41 17
4 ALASKA 1 50.5 51 31 47
OIL, NATURAL
GAS, AND
HYDROELECT 6 0
NATURAL
GAS
(56.6%)
HYDROE
(22.3%) 46 50 35 19 49 18 16 49
5 INDIANA 7 47.6 17 27 13
COAL,
ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
AND
PETROCHEM 2 0
COAL
(94.2%) 5 1 27 45 37 33 38 47
Page 1 of 12
2. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
6 NORTH DAKOTA 4 46.7 48 8 45
OIL,
ETHANOL,
SYNFUELS,
WIND
POWER, AND
HYDROELECT 1 0
COAL
(94.8%) 7 42 16 7 9 35 48 13
7 ALABAMA 6 46.3 27 17 21
BIODIESEL,
HYDROELECT
, COAL, OIL,
NUCLEAR,
AND
PETROCHEM 4 3
COAL
(56.6%)
NUCLEAR
(23.0%)
NATURAL
GAS
(10.1%) 12 12 46 48 21 42 46 28
8 WEST VIRGINIA 9 44.1 30 41 34
COAL AND
PETROCHEM 1 0
COAL
(97.6%) 4 33 8 51 3 48 49 27
9 ARKANSAS 13 41.7 35 21 32
HYDROELECT
, NATURAL
GAS,
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR,
AND
PETROCHEM 2 1
COAL
(48.2%)
NUCLEAR
(28.6%)
NATURAL
GAS
(12.6%) 9 5 24 47 27 49 51 32
10 IOWA 15 41.2 34 7 30
ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR,
AND WIND
ENERGY 0 1
COAL
(77.6%)
NUCLEAR
(10.3%) 18 8 45 26 11 29 44 40
11 SOUTH CAROLINA 14 38.6 22 3 24
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR,
AND
HYDROELECT 0 4
NUCLEAR
(51.8%)
COAL
(38.7%) 15 9 32 44 26 44 35 25
Page 2 of 12
3. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
12 IDAHO 23 38.0 45 34 39 HYDROELECT 0 0
HYDROE
(78.9%)
NATURAL
GAS
(14.3%) 2 21 16 33 45 45 29 4
13 MONTANA 10 37.9 49 12 43
OIL, NATURAL
GAS, COAL,
WIND
POWER, AND
HYDROELECT 4 0
COAL
(63.8%)
HYDROE
(34.3%) 19 47 5 28 4 40 31 8
14 KENTUCKY 8 37.5 24 20 25
COAL,
BIODIESEL,
ETHANOL,
AND
HYROELECT 2 0
COAL
(91.1%) 1 7 34 46 19 43 42 33
15 OKLAHOMA 11 37.3 36 2 28
OIL, NATURAL
GAS,
PETROCHEM,
BIODIESEL,
HYDROELECT
, AND WIND
ENERGY 5 0
COAL
(53.0%)
NATURAL
GAS
(41.6%) 22 24 10 39 33 41 47 30
16 MISSISSIPPI 12 37.3 33 6 31
OIL, NATURAL
GAS,
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR
AND
PETROCHEM 4 1
COAL
(36.9%)
NATURAL
GAS
(34.1%)
NUCLEAR
(22.4%) 30 9 12 50 41 50 50 46
Page 3 of 12
4. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
17 KANSAS 16 36.9 41 22 33
OIL, NATURAL
GAS,
NUCLEAR,
COAL,
ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
GEOTHERM,
AND WIND
ENERGY 3 1
COAL
(75.2%)
NUCLEAR
(19.2%) 17 23 29 23 38 26 40 19
18 WISCONSIN 28 36.6 25 37 19
NUCLEAR
BIODIESEL,
AND
ETHANOL 1 2
COAL
(67.4%)
NUCLEAR
(16.0%)
NATURAL
GAS
(10.3%) 25 3 44 32 17 21 26 39
19 DELAWARE 19 35.8 8 14 44
BIODIESEL
AND
PETROCHEM 1 0
COAL
(59.4%)
NATURAL
GAS
(19.6%)
FUEL OIL
(15.0%) 36 29 47 14 16 12 18 45
20 TENNESSEE 17 33.8 20 9 14
NUCLEAR,
BIODIESEL,
ETHANOL,
AND
HYDROELECT 1 2
COAL
(61.0%)
NUCLEAR
(28.6%)
HYDROE
(9.6%) 13 4 39 41 23 36 37 42
Page 4 of 12
5. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
21 OHIO 25 33.8 10 36 7
COAL,
BIODIESEL,
ETHANOL,
NUCLEAR
AND
PETROCHEM 4 2
COAL
(87.2%)
NUCLEAR
(9.4%) 26 6 19 35 18 27 28 48
22 NEW MEXICO 21 33.4 46 23 40
OIL, NATURAL
GAS,
URANIUM,
AND WIND
ENERGY 3 0
COAL
(85.2%)
NATURAL
GAS
(11.9%) 31 46 3 40 35 47 36 12
23 PENNSLYLVANNIA 30 32.5 11 47 5
NUCLEAR,
OIL,
BIODIESEL,
AND COAL 5 5
COAL
(55.5%)
NUCLEAR
(35.0%) 38 14 32 34 5 19 34 36
24 MAINE 20 32.1 39 4 38
WOOD AND
HYDROELECT 0 0
NATURAL
GAS
(44.6%)
HYDROE
(21.7%)
RENEW
(21.6%) 41 30 11 42 1 32 25 43
25 ILLINOIS 34 31.6 12 46 6
NUCLEAR,
ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
COAL, AND
PETROCHEM 4 6
NUCLEAR
(48.0%)
COAL
(47.7%) 24 16 27 18 40 16 19 35
26 NEBRASKA 18 31.5 43 30 37
NUCLEAR,
BIODIESEL,
ETHANOL,
HYDROELECT
, AND WIND
ENERGY 0 2
COAL
(66.2%)
NUCLEAR
(28.0%) 6 36 25 10 34 23 39 41
Page 5 of 12
6. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
27 GEORGIA 24 30.6 19 15 9
BIODIESEL
AND
NUCLEAR 1 2
COAL
(63.8%)
NUCLEAR
(23.1%) 23 18 48 17 48 34 27 11
28 MINNESOTA 22 30.6 32 18 20
BIODIESEL,
ETHANOL,
AND
NUCLEAR 2 2
COAL
(62.1%)
NUCLEAR
(24.2%) 17 13 42 11 31 10 15 44
29 UTAH 36 28.7 42 32 36
OIL, NATURAL
GAS,
URANIUM,
COAL, AND
GEOTHERM 5 0
COAL
(94.2%) 8 32 49 36 51 46 20 6
30 MICHIGAN 35 28.3 16 29 8
NUCLEAR,
ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
AND WOOD 1 3
COAL
(57.8%)
NUCLEAR
(27.0%)
NATURAL
GAS
(11.2%) 27 2 14 38 30 25 24 50
31 WASHINGTON 31 27.9 26 43 16
NUCLEAR,
HYDROELECT
, BIODIESEL,
AND
PETROCHEM 5 2
HYDROE
(70.7%)
COAL
(10.3%)
NATURAL
GAS
(8.4%) 10 31 26 16 32 17 12 21
32 OREGON 37 27.5 40 44 29
ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
AND
HYDROELECT 1 0
HYDROE
(62.7%)
NATURAL
GAS
(26.7%) 14 17 23 31 28 30 14 5
Page 6 of 12
7. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
33 COLORADO 39 26.9 38 41 26
OIL, NATURAL
GAS,
ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
URANIUM,
AND COAL 2 0
COAL
(71.7%)
NATURAL
GAS
(24.0%) 29 40 37 5 44 9 11 18
34 NEVADA 40 26.8 44 49 35
BIODIESEL,
HYDROELECT
, URANIUM
AND
GEOTHERM 1 0
NATURAL
GAS
(46.6%)
COAL
(45.7%) 40 45 1 42 43 13 13 2
35 NORTH CAROLINA 33 26.6 18 25 10
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR,
AND
HYDROELECT 0 3
COAL
(60.5%)
NUCLEAR
(30.8%) 28 11 31 37 35 38 32 20
36 CALIFORNIA 49 24.6 12 45 1
OIL,
PETROCHEM,
HYDROELECT
, ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR,
AND
GEOTHERM 21 2
NATURAL
GAS
(46.7%)
HYROE
(19.8%)
NUCLEAR
(18.1%) 49 27 21 13 47 11 1 16
37 MARYLAND 41 24.1 6 38 18
BIODIESEL
AND
NUCLEAR 0 1
COAL
(55.7%)
NUCLEAR
(27.9%) 32 44 41 3 25 5 10 22
Page 7 of 12
8. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
38 SOUTH DAKOTA 27 24.0 47 5 46
BIODIESEL,
ETHANOL,
WIND
ENERGY,
AND
HYDROELECT 0 0
HYDROE
(47.2%)
COAL
(46.0%) 20 37 17 9 29 37 45 24
39 VIRGINIA 26 23.1 15 19 12
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR,
COAL, AND
HYDROELECT 0 2
COAL
(44.9%)
NUCLEAR
(35.4%)
NATURAL
GAS
(10.5%) 21 35 50 4 24 8 17 7
40 HAWAII 45 21.4 14 50 51
BIODIESEL
AND
ETHANOL 2 0
FUEL OIL
(78.8%)
COAL
(14.2%) 51 49 2 25 12 20 2 10
41 MISSOURI 32 21.1 28 10 15
NUCLEAR,
HYDROELECT
, BIODIESEL,
AND
ETHANOL 0 1
COAL
(85.3%)
NUCLEAR
(8.8%) 11 21 22 30 22 31 33 34
42 VERMONT 42 18.6 31 11 48
NUCLEAR
AND
HYDROELECT 0 1
NUCLEAR
(71.2%)
HYDROE
(21.2%) 47 25 30 15 2 24 21 29
43 NEW JERSEY 38 18.4 2 28 11
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR,
AND
PETROCHEM 6 3
NUCLEAR
(51.8%)
NATURAL
GAS
(25.1%)
COAL
(19.2%) 43 34 43 6 15 4 5 37
Page 8 of 12
9. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
44 RHODE ISLAND 51 17.8 3 35 42 BIODIESEL 0 0
NATURAL
GAS
(99.0%) 45 20 13 22 13 14 6 38
45 NEW HAMPSHIRE 44 16.5 21 13 41
NUCLEAR
AND
HYDROELECT 0 1
NUCLEAR
(38.6%)
NATURAL
GAS
(27.7%)
COAL
(16.6%) 48 15 51 12 7 7 9 15
46 ARIZONA 47 16.1 37 48 23
HYDROELECT
, COAL,
URANIUM,
AND
NUCLEAR 0 1
COAL
(39.6%)
NATURAL
GAS
(28.5%)
NUCLEAR
(25.4%) 34 39 9 20 46 39 23 1
47 CONNECTICUT 43 13.3 5 40 27
BIODIESEL
AND
NUCLEAR 0 1
NUCLEAR
(46.4%)
NATURAL
GAS
(26.4%)
COAL
(11.9%)
FUEL OIL
(9.4%) 42 18 38 2 7 2 7 23
Page 9 of 12
10. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
48 MASSACHUSETTS 48 13.3 4 33 17 NUCLEAR 0 1
NATURAL
GAS
(42.7%)
COAL
(25.3%)
FUEL OIL
(15.0%)
NUCLEAR
(11.5%) 44 26 36 8 14 3 4 31
49 NEW YORK 50 12.6 7 50 4
BIODIESEL,
HYDROELECT
, AND
NUCLEAR 0 4
NUCLEAR
(28.9%)
NATURAL
GAS
(21.7%)
HYDROE
(17.6%)
FUEL OIL
(16.4%) 50 41 7 21 20 6 8 26
50 FLORIDA 46 12.4 9 26 3
BIODIESEL
AND
NUCLEAR 0 2
NATURAL
GAS
(38.0%)
COAL
(28.4%)
FUEL OIL
(16.9%)
NUCLEAR
(13.1%) 39 43 6 27 6 22 22 3
51 WASHINGTON DC 29 0.2 1 51 50 "HOT AIR" 0 0
FUEL OIL
(100%) 35 51 40 1 39 1 3 14
UNITED STATES
AVERAGE 33.0% 31.7 148 66 12.1% 16.3% 13.6% 36.4 $33,847 $151,366 3.4%
US VIRGIN
ISLANDS 1 (Owned jointly by Hess Co. and PDV (Venezuela's National Oil Co.)
Page 10 of 12
11. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
PUERTO RICO 1
ENERGY
CONSUM
RANKING STATE
TOTAL
ENERGY
(TRILLIO
N BTU
2005)
PER
CAPITA
CONSUMP
RANKING
1 TEXAS 11971.4 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 5 VERY HIGH LEVEL OF ENERGY INTENSIVE MANUFACTURING BUT ALSO A LOT OF PEOPLE
2 CALIFORNIA 8364.6 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 49 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION!
3 FLORIDA 4452.5 PEOPLE 46 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION!
4 NEW YORK 4254.0 PEOPLE 50 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION!
5 PENNSYLVANIA 4049.4 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 30 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION!
6 OHIO 4022.8 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 25
7 ILLINOIS 3960.5 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 34 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION!
8 LOUISIANA 3816.3 PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY 3 VERY HIGH LEVEL OF ENERGY INTENSIVE MANUFACTURING
9 GEORGIA 3141.1 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 24
10 MICHIGAN 3119.4 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 35 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION!
NOTE 1: Highest rankings have the greatest energy consumption by the industrial sector as a percentage of total energy consumption making them the most industrialized areas in the United States.
TEN LARGEST CONSUMERS OF ENERGY IN THE UNITED STATES - PEOPLE ARE THE PROBLEM, NOT INDUSTRY!
MAIN REASON FOR ENERGY CONSUMPTION
NOTE 2: Highest rankings have greatest energy consumption by the residental sector as a percentage of total energy consumption making them the least industrialized areas of the United States. The least
industrialized areas are occupied by the least productive in the energy and manufacturing areas and are red.
Industrial sector: An energy-consuming sector that consists of all facilities and equipment used for producing, processing, or assembling goods. The industrial sector encompasses the following types of activity:
manufacturing (NAICS codes 31-33); agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting (NAICS code 11); mining, including oil and gas extraction (NAICS code 21); and construction (NAICS code 23). Overall energy use in this
sector is largely for process heat and cooling and powering machinery, with lesser amounts used for facility heating, air conditioning, and lighting. Fossil fuels are also used as raw material inputs to manufactured
products. Note: This sector includes generators that produce electricity and/or useful thermal output primarily to support the above-mentioned industrial activities.
Page 11 of 12
12. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
NOTE 5: 2004 American Community Survey: Highest rankings have highest percentage of service workers. Service workers generally do not produce any products; therefore, highest rankings are red.
BLUE = ABOVE AVERAGE ENERGY USE EFFICIENCY STATISTIC (TOP 15)
RED = BELOW AVERAGE ENERGY USE EFFICIENCY STATISTIC (LOWEST 15)
ORANGE = MATT SIMMONS NEW ENGLAND STATES WITH LITTLE OR NO FOSSIL FUEL ENERGY RESOURCES + HAWAII
VIOLET = MATT SIMMONS ENERGY PARASITE STATES + DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Revised based on % industrial sector consumption data)
DARK BLUE = ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE WITH LITTLE OR NO FOSSIL FUEL RESOURCES BUT NOT CONSUMING ALOT OF GASOLINE OR NATURAL GAS ON A PER CAPITA BASIS
NOTE 10: 2004 Census Bureau data. Highest rankings have the highest economic growth rates. These areas are the areas generally people are moving to and are the areas where energy consumption is increasing,
usually residential energy consumption. The highest rankings are red.
NOTE 4: 2004 American Community Survey : Highest rankings have the highest percentage of manufacturing workers. Manufacturing workers produce chemicals, energy resources, food, and products in general:
therefore, highest rankings are blue.
NOTE 6: 2004 American Community Survey: Highest rankings have highest percentage of business, management, and financial sector workers. These workers generally produce few products; therefore, highest
rankings are red.
NOTE 9: 2004 Census Bureau data. Highest rankings have the highest median monthly cost for owner-occupied housing. Those areas are ususally the areas with highest population density, highest electricity cost,
highest per capita income, the highest median age populations, and usually the least amount industrial activity; therefore, the highest rankings are red.
NOTE 3: Highest rankings have the lowest retail electricity prices. Highest ranks usually mean that the cost of producing the electricity is lower than the average; therefore, highest rankings are blue.
NOTE 7: 2004 Census Bureau data. Highest rankings have the highest median age. Older workers are less productive than younger workers; therefore, highest rankings are red.
NOTE 8: 2004 Census Bureau data. Highest rankings have the highest per capital personal income. Those areas with the highest personal per capita income are usually the areas that personally consume the
largest amounts of energy; therfore, the highest rankings are red.
Page 12 of 12