This document provides information about power generation and distribution in Uttar Pradesh. It details the installed capacity of various power plants in the state run by entities like UPRVUNL, NTPC, and private operators. It also lists upcoming power projects. Distribution is handled by four state-owned discoms and two private discoms. The document performs SWOT analyses of the generation and distribution sectors and describes the UDAY scheme aimed at improving discom efficiency. Overall, it comprehensively outlines the power infrastructure and key entities involved in the sector in Uttar Pradesh.

1. PRESENTED BY:-
1. ADARSH GUPTA
2. SHUBHAM KUMAR
3. ROHIT VERMA
4. B.N. MAURYA

2. POWER GENERATION COMPANY
STATE GOVT.  UPRVUNL
UPJVNL
4933 MW
76.2 MW
CENTRAL GOVT. NTPC
NPCIL
9790 MW
440 MW
PRIVATE SECTOR RELIANCE POWER 1200 MW

3. UPRVUNL
Sr. No. NAME OF PLANT LOCATION EST. NO. OF
UNIT
INSTALLED
CAPACITY
(MW)
1. ANPARA TPS SONEBHADRA 1986 05 1630
2. OBRA TPS SHAKTI
NAGAR
1967 09 1288
3. PARICHHA TPS JHANSI 1985 06 1140
4. PANKI TPS KANPUR 1977 02 210
5. HARDUAGANJ
TPS
ALIGARH 1977 04 665
TOTAL 4933

4. NTPC
Sr. No. NAME OF
PLANT
LOCATION EST. NO. OF
UNIT
INSTALLED
CAPACITY
(MW)
01. SINGRAULI TPS SONEBHADRA 1982 07 2000
02. RIHAND TPS SONEBHADRA 1988 06 3000
03. UNCHAHAR
TPS
RAEBARELI 1988 05 1050
04. TANDA TPS AMBEDKAR NAGAR 2000 04 440
05. DADRI (COAL) GAUTAM BUDHA
NAGAR
1991 06 1820
06. DADRI (GAS) GAUTAM BUDHA
NAGAR
1992 06 817
07. AURAIYA (GAS) DIBIYAPUR 1989 06 663.36
TOTAL 9790.36

5. NUCLEAR & PRIVATE
Sr.
No.
PLANT NAME LOCATION EST. NO. OF
UNIT
INSTALLED
CAPACITY(MW)
01. NARORA APS
(NPCIL)
BULANDSAHAR 1991 02 440
02. ROSA TPS
(RELIANCE
POWER)
SHAHJANPUR 2010 02 1200

6. SWOT ANALYSIS
STRENGTH
R & D Support from CEA.
Largest no. of technical man-power.
Reduces the risk of liquidation.
Most plants are depriciated leads to less strain
on the balance sheet.
WEAKNESS
Slow decision making process.
Cost,quality & schedule for “works” lowers
efficiency in O&M and projects.
Promotions are not based on competence.
OPPORTUNITY
Increase the PLF close to national average of
75%.
Productivity improvements through usage of IT
applications.
Using automated equipments/super critical
plants reduces price of power.
THREATS
Integrity of employees, suppliers as mafias with
political linkage.
BHEL has taken advance money for R&M but
may not start work even in future.
Due to demand pressure ,R&M can’t be done at
schedule.

7. UPCOMING POWER PLANTS
Sr.
No.
Unit Company Capacity
(MW)
Location
01. Amauli fatehpur UPPCL & NEYVELI 1980 Fatehpur
02. Anpara ext. UPRVUNL 1000 Sonebhadra
03. Bara TPS JAYPEE GROUP 3300 Allahabad
04. Barabanki power project PAREKH
ALUMINEX
250 Barabanki
05. Bhoginipur TPS LANCO 1320 Ramabai
nagar
06. Bilhaur STPS NTPC 1320 Kanpur nagar
07. Churk TPS JAYPEE 240 Sonebhadra
08. Unchahar TPS NTPC 500 Raebareli
09. Ghatampur TPS UPRVUNL &
NEYVELI
1980 Kanpur nagar
10. Gonda power project NMDC, IL & FS 500 Gonda
11. Harduaganj ext. UPRVUNL 660 Aligarh

8. Distribution
Power Discoms. are as follows :-
1.State Gov. Owned:
 Pu.V.V.N Ltd.
 D.V.V.N Ltd.
 P.V.V.N Ltd.
 M.V.V.N Ltd.
2. Pvt Owned:
 K.E.S. Co.
 N.P.C. Ltd.

9. Si.
No.
Company Head
Quarter
ESTD. Area of
operation
AT & C
Losses
( FY 2012-13)
01. PURVANCHAL
VIDYUT VITRAN
NIGAM Ltd.
Varanasi Jan-2000 21 Districts 23%
02. DAKSHINANCHAL
VIDYUT VITRAN
NIGAM Ltd.
Agra Jul-2003 22 Districts 29%
03. PASCHIMANCHAL
VIDYUT VITRAN
NIGAM Ltd.
Meerut Jul-2003 11 Districts 25.39%
04. MADHYANCHAL
VIDYUT VITRAN
NIGAM Ltd.
Lucknow Jul-2003 19 Districts 24%
05. KANPUR ELECTRIC
SUPPLY COMPANY
Ltd.
Kanpur Jan-2000 500 sq.km 42.94%
06. NOIDA POWER
COMPANY Ltd.
Greater
Noida
Dec-1993 355 sq.km 8%
DISCOMS COMPANIES

10. SWOT Analysis of DISCOMS
STRENGTH
I. Robust legal, regulatory and policy
framework
II. Power market infrastructure to match
suppliers and buyers
III. heavy man power
OPPORTUINITY
I. Large market availability
II. Improve distribution
infrastructure through central
schemes
WEAKNESS
I. Lot’s of distribution losses
II. Multiple stakeholder
III. Competing set of objectives
THREATS
I. Risk of delayed
projects
II. Delays in equipment
availability

11. UDAY SCHEME
(UJWAL DISCOM ASSURANCE YOJNA)
 Established on 20th nov. 2015.
 Its objective is to improve the financial and operational efficiency of State
Discoms.
 AT & C Losses (2013-14) is about 25% which is to be decreased upto 15% by FY
2018-19 thus potential savings are 5227Cr.

13. REFERENCES
 WWW.CEA.NIC.IN
 WWW.NTPC.CO.IN
 WWW.UPRVUNL.ORG.IN
 WWW.UPPCL.ORG.IN
 https://en.wikipedia.org.in