SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Unit testing in embedded environments
         with Parasoft C++test
Agenda
 Introduction
    What are the embedded systems
    What is Unit Testing
 Unit Testing With C++test
    General flow
    Test cases generation
 Unit Testing in Embedded Environments
    General flow
    Runtime requirements
    Building test executable
    Pros, Cons, limitations
 Questions ....
Introduction
What is an embedded system ?



An embedded system is a combination of computer
hardware and the software, and perhaps additional
mechanical or other parts, designed to perform a
specific function.


                   (Michael Barr - Programming Embedded Systems)
A generic embedded system



                 Memory




                                       Functional devices
      Inputs     Processor   Outputs
Example 1 - VCR
                  VCR can be made of:
                   8 bit processor
                   ROM and RAM
                   Mechanical
                    components
                   Analog modules
                    for signal
                    processing
                   Platform targeted
                    operating system
Example 2 - Opportunity
                          Opportunity:
                           CPU RAD6000
                            (RISC)
                           128 MB DRAM
                           3 MB EEPROM
                           256 MB FLASH
                           Running on
                            VxWORKS
                            (WindRiver)
                            operating system
Example 3 - Pendolino
                        Composed of many
                        sub systems running
                        on different
                        hardware platforms
                        and different
                        operating systems
Development process




    Host Machine                     CPU
                       deployment
   Cross development
      environment                   Target Platform


                                     MEM
Unit Testing


In computer programming, a unit test is a
procedure used to validate that a particular module
of source code is working properly. The procedure is
to write test cases for all functions and methods so
that whenever a change causes a regression, it can
be quickly identified and fixed.

                                     (www.wikipedia.org)
Unit testing with C++test
-test flow
-test harness architecture
-test cases
-regression testing
Unit Testing with C++test


   Automatic test cases generation
   Test cases in a form of source code
   Coverage metrics
   Post-Conditions recording for regression testing
   Automatic Stubs configuration
   Automatic test flow management
   Command line mode
   Convenient reporting system
From source code to test results

                                test results

            C++test
                                instrumented
 source          Parser          user source
  code
             Instr Generator


               Test Cases        test cases      Test
               Generator           source      Executable

                                                runtime
                                                 library
libraries   Libraries Scanner       stub
                                   source
             Stub Manager
Tests architecture - example



  #include <header>

  int funcB();

  int funcA(int b)
  {
     int a = funcB();
     return a + b;
  }
Tests architecture - example
                                      Test Executable

   test runner
       main() {             instrumented code
           call_test_case   Int funcA(int a) {
      .....}                   instr_callback();
                               int b = funcB_stub();
                               instr_callback();
                               return a + b;
                            }
   test_case
   {
     pre_cond                    Stubs
     funcA()                     funcB_stub() {
     post_cond                      return 0;
   }                             }
Test cases
Test cases architecture
                                       Test case is composed of
TestSuite_MyClass::test_foo_0()          three sections:
{
  //PreCondition initialization
  int arg_1 = 0;
  MyClass testObject();                 Pre conditions setup
    //Tested function call
                                        Tested function call
    int ret = testObject.func(arg1);    Post conditions
    //PostConditions validation          validation
    CPPTEST_ASSERT(ret == 1)

}
Automatic test cases generation
C++test's test cases generator automatically
produces source elements for:

Initializing pre-conditions like: function arguments,
global variables, 'this' object for tested function

Calling the tested function or method

Validating post-conditions (achieved test result)
Initialization strategies
 Simple (built-in) types:
    Integers (-1,0,1, min, max value)
    Floating point (-1.0, 0.0, 1.0, max, min positive, max,
     min negative)
    Heuristic values



 Complex types (user defined types) C++test will
  use available constructors and generate code
  necessary to initialize constructors arguments.
Initialization strategies
 Pointer types:
    NULL pointer
    address of a local object created on stack
    address of an object created with “new” (on heap)
 Reference types:
    local object created on stack
    object created using operator “new”
 Heuristic values for simple types:
    int
    float
    char *
Post conditions
C++test provides macros and routines for controlling
how source code test results are collected and
validated:

Test case post-conditions are controlled via
assertion macros (similar to CppUnit)
    CPPTEST_ASSERT_INTEGER_EQUAL(expected,actual)


Assertions perform a condition validation and send
results back to C++test
Test case example with post-conditions


      /* CPPTEST_TEST_CASE_BEGIN test_bufLen_0 */
      void TestSuite_bufLen_0::test_bufLen_0()
      {
         /* Pre-condition initialization */

          /* Initializing argument 0 (this) */
              /* Initializing constructor argument 1 (fill) */
              char _fill_0 = '001';
          ::Data _cpptest_TestObject (_fill_0);

          /* Tested function call */
          int _return = _cpptest_TestObject.bufLen();

          /* Post-condition check */
          CPPTEST_ASSERT_INTEGER_EQUAL(4, ( _return ))
          CPPTEST_ASSERT(( _cpptest_TestObject._data ) != 0)
      }
Regression test cases generation

   subsequent test runs


               generation                      Test results


       Test cases                Validation              Testing
       generation

                                         First test execution
                            Test cases




                            Regression
                            test cases
Stubs
Stubs – handling missing definitions

                                    Instrumented
     Libraries                       source code
         &
    object files
                                   Auto generated
                                        stubs

                                  int func2()
                                  {
                                     return 0;
                                  }
extern int func2();

int func1(int b)                    User defined
{                                      stubs
   int a = func2();
   return a + b;
}
Stubs in C++test
 Stubs are used:
   when testing in separation from other modules
   when application module is not yet ready
   when hardware module is not yet ready
 C++test provides three modes for stubbed
  function:
   original
   user-defined
   auto-generated
 Stubs configuration is managed from C++test GUI
  and persisted in C++test project
Unit Testing in embedded environments
-test flow
-runtime library
-problems & limitations
-why to unit test on target ?
Unit testing in embedded environment
C++test
                                  runtime



           Cross Compiler
runtime




                                                          linker/locator
library                            library
 source
                                                                              Test
                                                                           executable
                                    Test
 Test                             harness
harness                           binaries
source




                                                                           deploy
 code



                            host - target communication

                                       results
Unit testing in embedded environment

   Host
    Development env                               Target


           C++test              deploy
                                                  Test executable

                                                 Runtime library
             Listening                           communication
               agent     communication channel      module
C++test runtime library
C++test runtime library


 Provided in form of source code
 Implemented in plain C
 Needs to be cross-compiled for specific target
  platform
 Contains definition of communication channel
  Provided implementations:
   file
   TCP/IP sockets
 Designed to be easily customizable
C++test runtime library
Communication module
Target-to-host communication module
 Custom implementation of communication channel
  can be plugged in
 Defining communication channel requires
  implementing four methods:
   cpptestInitializeCommunication(...);
   cpptestFinalizeCommunication(...);
   cpptestSendData(const char* data, unsigned size);
 All data transfer operations, performed inside C+
  +test runtime library are implemented in terms of
  above interface
Collecting results on target
  Host
                                       Target
           C++test

                                       Test executable

                     Manual results   Runtime library
                       transfer
   File                               communication
  System                                 module




                                           Local
                                          Storage
“On the fly” results transfer

  Host
                                                   Target
           C++test

                             TCP/IP Sockets        Test executable
                                RS 232
                                RS 485
                                   I2C
                                  ICE             Runtime library
   File       Listening                           communication
  System        agent     communication channel      module
C++test runtime library
Exceptions handling module
Exceptions handling
                                           C++test uses
  Test cases execution
        sequence                            exceptions handling
                                            facilities (try, catch,
                    Test                    setjmp, longjmp,
                   case 1                   signal) to recover if
                                            exception is thrown
                            exception
                                            during test sequence
handling enabled




                    Test
With exceptions




                   case 2
                            (e.g divide
                            by zero)       If target platform does
                                            not provide exceptions
                                            handling, test sequence
                    Test
                                            is broken on first
                   case n                   exception and needs to
                                            be restarted
Test flow automation
Test flow automation
 Test sequence can be automatically performed in
  C++test GUI as well as in command line mode
 Test sequence consists of test harness
  preparation, building test executable, deploying
  test executable, starting it, and collecting results
 Limitations in automation of testing process can be
  imposed be development environment
 C++test provides easy to use XML-based format
  for defining test framework operations
Problems & Limitations
Problems & limitations
 Not enough memory on the target device to store
  test harness and tested code may block or limit
  testing capabilities


                    Compilation without debug information

                Original file     Min Instr       Med Instr     Max Instr
 GNU GCC 3.2       22 KB         22 KB (0%)      29 KB (30%)   41 KB (80%)
 MSVC++ 7.1        33 KB         33 KB (0%)      41 KB (24%)   69 KB (100%)
Tornado simpc      23 KB         23 KB (0%)      30 KB (30%)   41 KB (78%)
Problems & limitations


 Lack of communication channel may effect in weak
  test automation

 Missing support for exceptions handling may
  increase the number of runs necessary to execute
  test cases scheduled for test session.

 Additional amount of work required during
  development process
Why to unit test on target ?
Pros of unit testing on target
 All well known positives from host-based unit
  testing (early bugs detection, increased code
  robustness, ...)
 Possibility of detecting hardware problems
 Possibility of detecting software/hardware
  interaction problems
 Easy stubbing of missing software (also hardware)
  modules
 Quick and automated generation of regression
  suites
Unit testing in embedded environment - example
static int iTemperatures[2];
                                            “Critical section”
void interrupt vReadTemperatures(void) {     related bugs are hard
    ITemperatures[0] = /*Read sensor 1*/     to detect during host-
    ITemperatures[1] = /*Read sensor 2*/     based unit testing
}
                                            Target-based unit
bool testSensors() {                         testing highly increases
    int iTemp0, iTemp1;                      probability of catching
    iTemp0 = ITemperatures[0];
                                             this kind of problems,
    iTemp1 = ITemperatures[1];
    if (iTemp0 != iTemp1) { // Alarm !!!
                                             however it does not
        return -1;                           provide 100% certainty
    }                                        of catching them.
    return 0;
}
Unit testing in embedded environment - example
                          Module for driving the position
                           of functional mechanical
                           equipment
 servo                    Hardware contains “stuck-at-
          encoder          zero” problem between the
                           encoder and board interface

                       int set_position(int angl)
                       {
                           if (angl < MIN || angl > MAX)
                           {
                               return INCORRECT_ANGL;
                           }
                           return run_servo(angl);
                       }
Epilog


 C++test offers a high level of automation for tasks
which are usually performed manually, especially in
embedded environments, therefore very often it lets
    us give the positive answer for a question:


          “to test ? or not to test ?”

More Related Content

What's hot

Unit testing best practices
Unit testing best practicesUnit testing best practices
Unit testing best practicesnickokiss
 
Understanding Unit Testing
Understanding Unit TestingUnderstanding Unit Testing
Understanding Unit Testing
ikhwanhayat
 
Keyword-driven Test Automation Framework
Keyword-driven Test Automation FrameworkKeyword-driven Test Automation Framework
Keyword-driven Test Automation Framework
Mikhail Subach
 
Test driven development in C
Test driven development in CTest driven development in C
Test driven development in CAmritayan Nayak
 
Mocking in Java with Mockito
Mocking in Java with MockitoMocking in Java with Mockito
Mocking in Java with MockitoRichard Paul
 
CppUnit using introduction
CppUnit using introductionCppUnit using introduction
CppUnit using introduction
Iurii Kyian
 
Acceptance Test Driven Development and Robot Framework
Acceptance Test Driven Development and Robot FrameworkAcceptance Test Driven Development and Robot Framework
Acceptance Test Driven Development and Robot Framework
Steve Zhang
 
Software testing and process
Software testing and processSoftware testing and process
Software testing and process
gouravkalbalia
 
Software devops engineer in test (SDET)
Software devops engineer in test (SDET)Software devops engineer in test (SDET)
Software devops engineer in test (SDET)
Sriram Angajala
 
Formation jmeter
Formation jmeterFormation jmeter
Formation jmeter
Abdelhaq El-Aibi
 
Présentation de Robot framework
Présentation de Robot frameworkPrésentation de Robot framework
Présentation de Robot frameworkgilleslenfant
 
UNIT TESTING
UNIT TESTINGUNIT TESTING
UNIT TESTING
Marius Crisan
 
Introduction to Software Test Automation
Introduction to Software Test AutomationIntroduction to Software Test Automation
Introduction to Software Test Automation
Amr Ali (ISTQB CTAL Full, CSM, ITIL Foundation)
 
BDD with SpecFlow and Selenium
BDD with SpecFlow and SeleniumBDD with SpecFlow and Selenium
BDD with SpecFlow and Selenium
Liraz Shay
 
Unit Test Presentation
Unit Test PresentationUnit Test Presentation
Unit Test PresentationSayedur Rahman
 
Unit Testing (C#)
Unit Testing (C#)Unit Testing (C#)
Unit Testing (C#)
Prashant Cholachagudd
 
Introduction to Robot Framework (external)
Introduction to Robot Framework (external)Introduction to Robot Framework (external)
Introduction to Robot Framework (external)
Zhe Li
 
Load Testing Best Practices
Load Testing Best PracticesLoad Testing Best Practices
Load Testing Best Practices
Apica
 
AngularJS $Provide Service
AngularJS $Provide ServiceAngularJS $Provide Service
AngularJS $Provide Service
Eyal Vardi
 
Test case writing
Test case writingTest case writing
Test case writing
Afsarah Jahin
 

What's hot (20)

Unit testing best practices
Unit testing best practicesUnit testing best practices
Unit testing best practices
 
Understanding Unit Testing
Understanding Unit TestingUnderstanding Unit Testing
Understanding Unit Testing
 
Keyword-driven Test Automation Framework
Keyword-driven Test Automation FrameworkKeyword-driven Test Automation Framework
Keyword-driven Test Automation Framework
 
Test driven development in C
Test driven development in CTest driven development in C
Test driven development in C
 
Mocking in Java with Mockito
Mocking in Java with MockitoMocking in Java with Mockito
Mocking in Java with Mockito
 
CppUnit using introduction
CppUnit using introductionCppUnit using introduction
CppUnit using introduction
 
Acceptance Test Driven Development and Robot Framework
Acceptance Test Driven Development and Robot FrameworkAcceptance Test Driven Development and Robot Framework
Acceptance Test Driven Development and Robot Framework
 
Software testing and process
Software testing and processSoftware testing and process
Software testing and process
 
Software devops engineer in test (SDET)
Software devops engineer in test (SDET)Software devops engineer in test (SDET)
Software devops engineer in test (SDET)
 
Formation jmeter
Formation jmeterFormation jmeter
Formation jmeter
 
Présentation de Robot framework
Présentation de Robot frameworkPrésentation de Robot framework
Présentation de Robot framework
 
UNIT TESTING
UNIT TESTINGUNIT TESTING
UNIT TESTING
 
Introduction to Software Test Automation
Introduction to Software Test AutomationIntroduction to Software Test Automation
Introduction to Software Test Automation
 
BDD with SpecFlow and Selenium
BDD with SpecFlow and SeleniumBDD with SpecFlow and Selenium
BDD with SpecFlow and Selenium
 
Unit Test Presentation
Unit Test PresentationUnit Test Presentation
Unit Test Presentation
 
Unit Testing (C#)
Unit Testing (C#)Unit Testing (C#)
Unit Testing (C#)
 
Introduction to Robot Framework (external)
Introduction to Robot Framework (external)Introduction to Robot Framework (external)
Introduction to Robot Framework (external)
 
Load Testing Best Practices
Load Testing Best PracticesLoad Testing Best Practices
Load Testing Best Practices
 
AngularJS $Provide Service
AngularJS $Provide ServiceAngularJS $Provide Service
AngularJS $Provide Service
 
Test case writing
Test case writingTest case writing
Test case writing
 

Similar to Unit testing on embedded target with C++Test

Full Stack Unit Testing
Full Stack Unit TestingFull Stack Unit Testing
Full Stack Unit Testing
GlobalLogic Ukraine
 
How to fake_properly
How to fake_properlyHow to fake_properly
How to fake_properly
Rainer Schuettengruber
 
Infrastructure testing with Molecule and TestInfra
Infrastructure testing with Molecule and TestInfraInfrastructure testing with Molecule and TestInfra
Infrastructure testing with Molecule and TestInfra
Tomislav Plavcic
 
In search of JavaScript code quality: unit testing
In search of JavaScript code quality: unit testingIn search of JavaScript code quality: unit testing
In search of JavaScript code quality: unit testingAnna Khabibullina
 
Comparative Development Methodologies
Comparative Development MethodologiesComparative Development Methodologies
Comparative Development Methodologieselliando dias
 
Automation Using Marvin Framework by Sowmya Krishnan
Automation Using Marvin Framework by Sowmya KrishnanAutomation Using Marvin Framework by Sowmya Krishnan
Automation Using Marvin Framework by Sowmya KrishnanRadhika Puthiyetath
 
Unit testingandcontinousintegrationfreenest1dot4
Unit testingandcontinousintegrationfreenest1dot4Unit testingandcontinousintegrationfreenest1dot4
Unit testingandcontinousintegrationfreenest1dot4
JAMK
 
Performance and Scalability Testing with Python and Multi-Mechanize
Performance and Scalability Testing with Python and Multi-MechanizePerformance and Scalability Testing with Python and Multi-Mechanize
Performance and Scalability Testing with Python and Multi-Mechanize
coreygoldberg
 
QTP Training
QTP TrainingQTP Training
QTP Training
G.C Reddy
 
QTP Online Training
QTP Online Training QTP Online Training
QTP Online Training
G Chandra Reddy
 
Measurement .Net Performance with BenchmarkDotNet
Measurement .Net Performance with BenchmarkDotNetMeasurement .Net Performance with BenchmarkDotNet
Measurement .Net Performance with BenchmarkDotNet
Vasyl Senko
 
Unmanaged Parallelization via P/Invoke
Unmanaged Parallelization via P/InvokeUnmanaged Parallelization via P/Invoke
Unmanaged Parallelization via P/InvokeDmitri Nesteruk
 
Tdd with python unittest for embedded c
Tdd with python unittest for embedded cTdd with python unittest for embedded c
Tdd with python unittest for embedded c
Benux Wei
 
Matlab isim link
Matlab isim linkMatlab isim link
Matlab isim link
Mohamed Abdelsalam
 
Static code analysis: what? how? why?
Static code analysis: what? how? why?Static code analysis: what? how? why?
Static code analysis: what? how? why?
Andrey Karpov
 
Node.js behind: V8 and its optimizations
Node.js behind: V8 and its optimizationsNode.js behind: V8 and its optimizations
Node.js behind: V8 and its optimizations
Dawid Rusnak
 
JavaScript Robotics
JavaScript RoboticsJavaScript Robotics
JavaScript Robotics
Anna Gerber
 
Hadoop: Code Injection, Distributed Fault Injection
Hadoop: Code Injection, Distributed Fault InjectionHadoop: Code Injection, Distributed Fault Injection
Hadoop: Code Injection, Distributed Fault Injection
Cloudera, Inc.
 
Property Based Testing in PHP
Property Based Testing in PHPProperty Based Testing in PHP
Property Based Testing in PHP
vinaikopp
 

Similar to Unit testing on embedded target with C++Test (20)

Full Stack Unit Testing
Full Stack Unit TestingFull Stack Unit Testing
Full Stack Unit Testing
 
How to fake_properly
How to fake_properlyHow to fake_properly
How to fake_properly
 
Infrastructure testing with Molecule and TestInfra
Infrastructure testing with Molecule and TestInfraInfrastructure testing with Molecule and TestInfra
Infrastructure testing with Molecule and TestInfra
 
In search of JavaScript code quality: unit testing
In search of JavaScript code quality: unit testingIn search of JavaScript code quality: unit testing
In search of JavaScript code quality: unit testing
 
Comparative Development Methodologies
Comparative Development MethodologiesComparative Development Methodologies
Comparative Development Methodologies
 
Automation Using Marvin Framework by Sowmya Krishnan
Automation Using Marvin Framework by Sowmya KrishnanAutomation Using Marvin Framework by Sowmya Krishnan
Automation Using Marvin Framework by Sowmya Krishnan
 
Unit testingandcontinousintegrationfreenest1dot4
Unit testingandcontinousintegrationfreenest1dot4Unit testingandcontinousintegrationfreenest1dot4
Unit testingandcontinousintegrationfreenest1dot4
 
Performance and Scalability Testing with Python and Multi-Mechanize
Performance and Scalability Testing with Python and Multi-MechanizePerformance and Scalability Testing with Python and Multi-Mechanize
Performance and Scalability Testing with Python and Multi-Mechanize
 
QTP Training
QTP TrainingQTP Training
QTP Training
 
QTP Online Training
QTP Online Training QTP Online Training
QTP Online Training
 
Measurement .Net Performance with BenchmarkDotNet
Measurement .Net Performance with BenchmarkDotNetMeasurement .Net Performance with BenchmarkDotNet
Measurement .Net Performance with BenchmarkDotNet
 
Unmanaged Parallelization via P/Invoke
Unmanaged Parallelization via P/InvokeUnmanaged Parallelization via P/Invoke
Unmanaged Parallelization via P/Invoke
 
Tdd with python unittest for embedded c
Tdd with python unittest for embedded cTdd with python unittest for embedded c
Tdd with python unittest for embedded c
 
Matlab isim link
Matlab isim linkMatlab isim link
Matlab isim link
 
Static code analysis: what? how? why?
Static code analysis: what? how? why?Static code analysis: what? how? why?
Static code analysis: what? how? why?
 
Node.js behind: V8 and its optimizations
Node.js behind: V8 and its optimizationsNode.js behind: V8 and its optimizations
Node.js behind: V8 and its optimizations
 
JavaScript Robotics
JavaScript RoboticsJavaScript Robotics
JavaScript Robotics
 
Hadoop: Code Injection, Distributed Fault Injection
Hadoop: Code Injection, Distributed Fault InjectionHadoop: Code Injection, Distributed Fault Injection
Hadoop: Code Injection, Distributed Fault Injection
 
Beyond Unit Testing
Beyond Unit TestingBeyond Unit Testing
Beyond Unit Testing
 
Property Based Testing in PHP
Property Based Testing in PHPProperty Based Testing in PHP
Property Based Testing in PHP
 

More from Engineering Software Lab

FDA software compliance 2016
FDA software compliance 2016FDA software compliance 2016
FDA software compliance 2016
Engineering Software Lab
 
המדריך לכוון חיישן מצב מצערת באופנועי קטמ דגמי הזרקת דלק
המדריך לכוון חיישן מצב מצערת באופנועי קטמ דגמי הזרקת דלקהמדריך לכוון חיישן מצב מצערת באופנועי קטמ דגמי הזרקת דלק
המדריך לכוון חיישן מצב מצערת באופנועי קטמ דגמי הזרקת דלק
Engineering Software Lab
 
המסדרת הפכה למגוהצת
המסדרת הפכה למגוהצתהמסדרת הפכה למגוהצת
המסדרת הפכה למגוהצת
Engineering Software Lab
 
Amran Tuberi - the damage of cycling to the desert ecosystem
Amran Tuberi - the damage of cycling to the desert ecosystemAmran Tuberi - the damage of cycling to the desert ecosystem
Amran Tuberi - the damage of cycling to the desert ecosystemEngineering Software Lab
 
Parasoft Concerto A complete ALM platform that ensures quality software can b...
Parasoft Concerto A complete ALM platform that ensures quality software can b...Parasoft Concerto A complete ALM platform that ensures quality software can b...
Parasoft Concerto A complete ALM platform that ensures quality software can b...
Engineering Software Lab
 
Palamida Open Source Compliance Solution
Palamida Open Source Compliance Solution Palamida Open Source Compliance Solution
Palamida Open Source Compliance Solution
Engineering Software Lab
 
Code coverage in theory and in practice form the do178 b perspective
Code coverage in theory and in practice form the do178 b perspectiveCode coverage in theory and in practice form the do178 b perspective
Code coverage in theory and in practice form the do178 b perspective
Engineering Software Lab
 
Code Coverage in Theory and in practice form the DO178B perspective
Code Coverage in Theory and in practice form the DO178B perspective   Code Coverage in Theory and in practice form the DO178B perspective
Code Coverage in Theory and in practice form the DO178B perspective Engineering Software Lab
 
WPF/ XamDataGrid Performance, Infragistics Seminar, Israel , November 2011
WPF/ XamDataGrid Performance, Infragistics Seminar, Israel , November 2011WPF/ XamDataGrid Performance, Infragistics Seminar, Israel , November 2011
WPF/ XamDataGrid Performance, Infragistics Seminar, Israel , November 2011Engineering Software Lab
 
Parasoft .TEST, Write better C# Code Using Data Flow Analysis
Parasoft .TEST, Write better C# Code Using  Data Flow Analysis Parasoft .TEST, Write better C# Code Using  Data Flow Analysis
Parasoft .TEST, Write better C# Code Using Data Flow Analysis
Engineering Software Lab
 
Nunit C# source code defects report by Parasoft dotTEST
Nunit  C# source code  defects report by Parasoft dotTEST Nunit  C# source code  defects report by Parasoft dotTEST
Nunit C# source code defects report by Parasoft dotTEST
Engineering Software Lab
 
Parasoft fda software compliance part2
Parasoft fda software compliance   part2Parasoft fda software compliance   part2
Parasoft fda software compliance part2
Engineering Software Lab
 
Parasoft fda software compliance part1
Parasoft fda software compliance   part1Parasoft fda software compliance   part1
Parasoft fda software compliance part1
Engineering Software Lab
 
Introduction to Parasoft C++TEST
Introduction to Parasoft C++TEST Introduction to Parasoft C++TEST
Introduction to Parasoft C++TEST
Engineering Software Lab
 
Perforce עשרת היתרונות המובילים של מערכת ניהול התצורה
Perforce עשרת היתרונות המובילים של מערכת ניהול התצורהPerforce עשרת היתרונות המובילים של מערכת ניהול התצורה
Perforce עשרת היתרונות המובילים של מערכת ניהול התצורהEngineering Software Lab
 

More from Engineering Software Lab (17)

FDA software compliance 2016
FDA software compliance 2016FDA software compliance 2016
FDA software compliance 2016
 
המדריך לכוון חיישן מצב מצערת באופנועי קטמ דגמי הזרקת דלק
המדריך לכוון חיישן מצב מצערת באופנועי קטמ דגמי הזרקת דלקהמדריך לכוון חיישן מצב מצערת באופנועי קטמ דגמי הזרקת דלק
המדריך לכוון חיישן מצב מצערת באופנועי קטמ דגמי הזרקת דלק
 
ועד בית דב כרמי 1
ועד בית דב כרמי 1ועד בית דב כרמי 1
ועד בית דב כרמי 1
 
המסדרת הפכה למגוהצת
המסדרת הפכה למגוהצתהמסדרת הפכה למגוהצת
המסדרת הפכה למגוהצת
 
Amran Tuberi - the damage of cycling to the desert ecosystem
Amran Tuberi - the damage of cycling to the desert ecosystemAmran Tuberi - the damage of cycling to the desert ecosystem
Amran Tuberi - the damage of cycling to the desert ecosystem
 
Parasoft Concerto A complete ALM platform that ensures quality software can b...
Parasoft Concerto A complete ALM platform that ensures quality software can b...Parasoft Concerto A complete ALM platform that ensures quality software can b...
Parasoft Concerto A complete ALM platform that ensures quality software can b...
 
Palamida Open Source Compliance Solution
Palamida Open Source Compliance Solution Palamida Open Source Compliance Solution
Palamida Open Source Compliance Solution
 
Code coverage in theory and in practice form the do178 b perspective
Code coverage in theory and in practice form the do178 b perspectiveCode coverage in theory and in practice form the do178 b perspective
Code coverage in theory and in practice form the do178 b perspective
 
Code Coverage in Theory and in practice form the DO178B perspective
Code Coverage in Theory and in practice form the DO178B perspective   Code Coverage in Theory and in practice form the DO178B perspective
Code Coverage in Theory and in practice form the DO178B perspective
 
WPF/ XamDataGrid Performance, Infragistics Seminar, Israel , November 2011
WPF/ XamDataGrid Performance, Infragistics Seminar, Israel , November 2011WPF/ XamDataGrid Performance, Infragistics Seminar, Israel , November 2011
WPF/ XamDataGrid Performance, Infragistics Seminar, Israel , November 2011
 
Parasoft .TEST, Write better C# Code Using Data Flow Analysis
Parasoft .TEST, Write better C# Code Using  Data Flow Analysis Parasoft .TEST, Write better C# Code Using  Data Flow Analysis
Parasoft .TEST, Write better C# Code Using Data Flow Analysis
 
Nunit C# source code defects report by Parasoft dotTEST
Nunit  C# source code  defects report by Parasoft dotTEST Nunit  C# source code  defects report by Parasoft dotTEST
Nunit C# source code defects report by Parasoft dotTEST
 
A Scalable Software Build Accelerator
A Scalable Software Build AcceleratorA Scalable Software Build Accelerator
A Scalable Software Build Accelerator
 
Parasoft fda software compliance part2
Parasoft fda software compliance   part2Parasoft fda software compliance   part2
Parasoft fda software compliance part2
 
Parasoft fda software compliance part1
Parasoft fda software compliance   part1Parasoft fda software compliance   part1
Parasoft fda software compliance part1
 
Introduction to Parasoft C++TEST
Introduction to Parasoft C++TEST Introduction to Parasoft C++TEST
Introduction to Parasoft C++TEST
 
Perforce עשרת היתרונות המובילים של מערכת ניהול התצורה
Perforce עשרת היתרונות המובילים של מערכת ניהול התצורהPerforce עשרת היתרונות המובילים של מערכת ניהול התצורה
Perforce עשרת היתרונות המובילים של מערכת ניהול התצורה
 

Recently uploaded

Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
DianaGray10
 
SAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdf
SAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdfSAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdf
SAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdf
Peter Spielvogel
 
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and Sales
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesThe Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and Sales
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and Sales
Laura Byrne
 
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR EventsMonitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Ana-Maria Mihalceanu
 
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 daysPushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Adtran
 
The Future of Platform Engineering
The Future of Platform EngineeringThe Future of Platform Engineering
The Future of Platform Engineering
Jemma Hussein Allen
 
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
Neo4j
 
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge Graph
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge Graph
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge Graph
Guy Korland
 
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdfFIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdf
FIDO Alliance
 
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
DianaGray10
 
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Passkeys at Amazon.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Passkeys at Amazon.pdfFIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Passkeys at Amazon.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Passkeys at Amazon.pdf
FIDO Alliance
 
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectDevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
Kari Kakkonen
 
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software Fuzzing
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software FuzzingRemoving Uninteresting Bytes in Software Fuzzing
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software Fuzzing
Aftab Hussain
 
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
DanBrown980551
 
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
SOFTTECHHUB
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
Neo4j
 
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 preview
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewState of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 preview
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 preview
Prayukth K V
 
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
KatiaHIMEUR1
 
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practicesNational Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
Quotidiano Piemontese
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
Neo4j
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
 
SAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdf
SAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdfSAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdf
SAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdf
 
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and Sales
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesThe Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and Sales
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and Sales
 
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR EventsMonitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events
 
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 daysPushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
 
The Future of Platform Engineering
The Future of Platform EngineeringThe Future of Platform Engineering
The Future of Platform Engineering
 
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
 
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge Graph
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge Graph
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge Graph
 
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdfFIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdf
 
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
 
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Passkeys at Amazon.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Passkeys at Amazon.pdfFIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Passkeys at Amazon.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Passkeys at Amazon.pdf
 
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectDevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
 
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software Fuzzing
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software FuzzingRemoving Uninteresting Bytes in Software Fuzzing
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software Fuzzing
 
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
 
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
 
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 preview
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewState of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 preview
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 preview
 
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
 
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practicesNational Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
 

Unit testing on embedded target with C++Test

  • 1. Unit testing in embedded environments with Parasoft C++test
  • 2. Agenda  Introduction  What are the embedded systems  What is Unit Testing  Unit Testing With C++test  General flow  Test cases generation  Unit Testing in Embedded Environments  General flow  Runtime requirements  Building test executable  Pros, Cons, limitations  Questions ....
  • 4. What is an embedded system ? An embedded system is a combination of computer hardware and the software, and perhaps additional mechanical or other parts, designed to perform a specific function. (Michael Barr - Programming Embedded Systems)
  • 5. A generic embedded system Memory Functional devices Inputs Processor Outputs
  • 6. Example 1 - VCR VCR can be made of:  8 bit processor  ROM and RAM  Mechanical components  Analog modules for signal processing  Platform targeted operating system
  • 7. Example 2 - Opportunity Opportunity:  CPU RAD6000 (RISC)  128 MB DRAM  3 MB EEPROM  256 MB FLASH  Running on VxWORKS (WindRiver) operating system
  • 8. Example 3 - Pendolino Composed of many sub systems running on different hardware platforms and different operating systems
  • 9. Development process Host Machine CPU deployment Cross development environment Target Platform MEM
  • 10. Unit Testing In computer programming, a unit test is a procedure used to validate that a particular module of source code is working properly. The procedure is to write test cases for all functions and methods so that whenever a change causes a regression, it can be quickly identified and fixed. (www.wikipedia.org)
  • 11. Unit testing with C++test -test flow -test harness architecture -test cases -regression testing
  • 12. Unit Testing with C++test  Automatic test cases generation  Test cases in a form of source code  Coverage metrics  Post-Conditions recording for regression testing  Automatic Stubs configuration  Automatic test flow management  Command line mode  Convenient reporting system
  • 13. From source code to test results test results C++test instrumented source Parser user source code Instr Generator Test Cases test cases Test Generator source Executable runtime library libraries Libraries Scanner stub source Stub Manager
  • 14. Tests architecture - example #include <header> int funcB(); int funcA(int b) { int a = funcB(); return a + b; }
  • 15. Tests architecture - example Test Executable test runner main() { instrumented code call_test_case Int funcA(int a) { .....} instr_callback(); int b = funcB_stub(); instr_callback(); return a + b; } test_case { pre_cond Stubs funcA() funcB_stub() { post_cond return 0; } }
  • 17. Test cases architecture Test case is composed of TestSuite_MyClass::test_foo_0() three sections: { //PreCondition initialization int arg_1 = 0; MyClass testObject();  Pre conditions setup //Tested function call  Tested function call int ret = testObject.func(arg1);  Post conditions //PostConditions validation validation CPPTEST_ASSERT(ret == 1) }
  • 18. Automatic test cases generation C++test's test cases generator automatically produces source elements for: Initializing pre-conditions like: function arguments, global variables, 'this' object for tested function Calling the tested function or method Validating post-conditions (achieved test result)
  • 19. Initialization strategies  Simple (built-in) types:  Integers (-1,0,1, min, max value)  Floating point (-1.0, 0.0, 1.0, max, min positive, max, min negative)  Heuristic values  Complex types (user defined types) C++test will use available constructors and generate code necessary to initialize constructors arguments.
  • 20. Initialization strategies  Pointer types:  NULL pointer  address of a local object created on stack  address of an object created with “new” (on heap)  Reference types:  local object created on stack  object created using operator “new”  Heuristic values for simple types:  int  float  char *
  • 21. Post conditions C++test provides macros and routines for controlling how source code test results are collected and validated: Test case post-conditions are controlled via assertion macros (similar to CppUnit)  CPPTEST_ASSERT_INTEGER_EQUAL(expected,actual) Assertions perform a condition validation and send results back to C++test
  • 22. Test case example with post-conditions /* CPPTEST_TEST_CASE_BEGIN test_bufLen_0 */ void TestSuite_bufLen_0::test_bufLen_0() { /* Pre-condition initialization */ /* Initializing argument 0 (this) */ /* Initializing constructor argument 1 (fill) */ char _fill_0 = '001'; ::Data _cpptest_TestObject (_fill_0); /* Tested function call */ int _return = _cpptest_TestObject.bufLen(); /* Post-condition check */ CPPTEST_ASSERT_INTEGER_EQUAL(4, ( _return )) CPPTEST_ASSERT(( _cpptest_TestObject._data ) != 0) }
  • 23. Regression test cases generation subsequent test runs generation Test results Test cases Validation Testing generation First test execution Test cases Regression test cases
  • 24. Stubs
  • 25. Stubs – handling missing definitions Instrumented Libraries source code & object files Auto generated stubs int func2() { return 0; } extern int func2(); int func1(int b) User defined { stubs int a = func2(); return a + b; }
  • 26. Stubs in C++test  Stubs are used:  when testing in separation from other modules  when application module is not yet ready  when hardware module is not yet ready  C++test provides three modes for stubbed function:  original  user-defined  auto-generated  Stubs configuration is managed from C++test GUI and persisted in C++test project
  • 27. Unit Testing in embedded environments -test flow -runtime library -problems & limitations -why to unit test on target ?
  • 28. Unit testing in embedded environment C++test runtime Cross Compiler runtime linker/locator library library source Test executable Test Test harness harness binaries source deploy code host - target communication results
  • 29. Unit testing in embedded environment Host Development env Target C++test deploy Test executable Runtime library Listening communication agent communication channel module
  • 31. C++test runtime library  Provided in form of source code  Implemented in plain C  Needs to be cross-compiled for specific target platform  Contains definition of communication channel Provided implementations:  file  TCP/IP sockets  Designed to be easily customizable
  • 33. Target-to-host communication module  Custom implementation of communication channel can be plugged in  Defining communication channel requires implementing four methods:  cpptestInitializeCommunication(...);  cpptestFinalizeCommunication(...);  cpptestSendData(const char* data, unsigned size);  All data transfer operations, performed inside C+ +test runtime library are implemented in terms of above interface
  • 34. Collecting results on target Host Target C++test Test executable Manual results Runtime library transfer File communication System module Local Storage
  • 35. “On the fly” results transfer Host Target C++test TCP/IP Sockets Test executable RS 232 RS 485 I2C ICE Runtime library File Listening communication System agent communication channel module
  • 37. Exceptions handling  C++test uses Test cases execution sequence exceptions handling facilities (try, catch, Test setjmp, longjmp, case 1 signal) to recover if exception is thrown exception during test sequence handling enabled Test With exceptions case 2 (e.g divide by zero)  If target platform does not provide exceptions handling, test sequence Test is broken on first case n exception and needs to be restarted
  • 39. Test flow automation  Test sequence can be automatically performed in C++test GUI as well as in command line mode  Test sequence consists of test harness preparation, building test executable, deploying test executable, starting it, and collecting results  Limitations in automation of testing process can be imposed be development environment  C++test provides easy to use XML-based format for defining test framework operations
  • 41. Problems & limitations  Not enough memory on the target device to store test harness and tested code may block or limit testing capabilities Compilation without debug information Original file Min Instr Med Instr Max Instr GNU GCC 3.2 22 KB 22 KB (0%) 29 KB (30%) 41 KB (80%) MSVC++ 7.1 33 KB 33 KB (0%) 41 KB (24%) 69 KB (100%) Tornado simpc 23 KB 23 KB (0%) 30 KB (30%) 41 KB (78%)
  • 42. Problems & limitations  Lack of communication channel may effect in weak test automation  Missing support for exceptions handling may increase the number of runs necessary to execute test cases scheduled for test session.  Additional amount of work required during development process
  • 43. Why to unit test on target ?
  • 44. Pros of unit testing on target  All well known positives from host-based unit testing (early bugs detection, increased code robustness, ...)  Possibility of detecting hardware problems  Possibility of detecting software/hardware interaction problems  Easy stubbing of missing software (also hardware) modules  Quick and automated generation of regression suites
  • 45. Unit testing in embedded environment - example static int iTemperatures[2];  “Critical section” void interrupt vReadTemperatures(void) { related bugs are hard ITemperatures[0] = /*Read sensor 1*/ to detect during host- ITemperatures[1] = /*Read sensor 2*/ based unit testing }  Target-based unit bool testSensors() { testing highly increases int iTemp0, iTemp1; probability of catching iTemp0 = ITemperatures[0]; this kind of problems, iTemp1 = ITemperatures[1]; if (iTemp0 != iTemp1) { // Alarm !!! however it does not return -1; provide 100% certainty } of catching them. return 0; }
  • 46. Unit testing in embedded environment - example  Module for driving the position of functional mechanical equipment servo  Hardware contains “stuck-at- encoder zero” problem between the encoder and board interface int set_position(int angl) { if (angl < MIN || angl > MAX) { return INCORRECT_ANGL; } return run_servo(angl); }
  • 47. Epilog C++test offers a high level of automation for tasks which are usually performed manually, especially in embedded environments, therefore very often it lets us give the positive answer for a question: “to test ? or not to test ?”