A best practices approach to cognitive interviewingRoller Research
The Total Quality Framework (TQF) offers a conceptual foundation from which qualitative researchers are able to think about the quality of their cognitive interviewing designs. The TQF is rooted in the belief that cognitive interviewing and all qualitative research methods must be: credible, analyzable, transparent, and useful.
Qualitative Research: What is the Total Quality Framework?Roller Research
A brief discussion of the Total Quality Framework, a paradigm-neutral, flexible approach utilizing quality principles to develop qualitative research designs that are credible, analyzable, transparent, and useful
The document summarizes the Prior Learning Assessment and Recognition (PLAR) process for internationally-educated dietitians (IEDs) in Canada. The multi-phase process assesses applicants' academic education, practical training, and language proficiency. Eligible applicants complete a Knowledge and Competency Assessment Tool (KCAT), Performance-Based Assessment (PBA), and Jurisprudence Knowledge and Assessment Tool (JKAT). The process aims to be transparent, objective, impartial and fair while avoiding unnecessary costs and assessments for applicants.
Project output versus influence in practice: impact as a dimension of resea...Hazel Hall
This keynote presentation discusses research impact and its measurement in the field of library and information science (LIS). The presentation makes several key points: LIS impact takes many forms; measuring research impact is challenging due to issues like attribution of outcomes; research impact matters and is increasingly being used to measure research quality; and various strategies can be used to extend the reach of research outcomes, like employing action research approaches and targeting dissemination. The presentation also discusses themes around measuring impact found in the LIS literature and provides examples of approaches that can improve research impact in practice based on preliminary findings from the RiLIES research project.
Money, Money, Money, Money – Grant Writing Tips to Help Make Your World Go Roundccpc
Nikki Siercks
Monroe High School/LAUSD (Retired)
Grant writing should not be a mystery. This workshop will show you where to find a grant application, how to successfully approach the application, break it down, and understand what the grantor is looking for, and how to tell your story in a clear, compelling manner.
This document provides tips for successful grant writing, including reading the request for proposal carefully, doing research on the funding agency, tying your proposal to student outcomes, keeping writing concise and error-free, collaborating with other organizations, including detailed budgets and sustainability plans, and providing any requested supplementary materials.
The document provides tips for grant writing, including how to prepare by knowing your organization, customers/audience, and potential funding sources. It outlines key elements of a successful grant proposal such as the summary, introduction, problem statement, objectives, methods, evaluation, future funding plan, and budget. The tips advise grant writers to present their organization's mission and needs in a compelling way to the specific funding source and ensure all elements of the proposal support and are consistent with each other.
A best practices approach to cognitive interviewingRoller Research
The Total Quality Framework (TQF) offers a conceptual foundation from which qualitative researchers are able to think about the quality of their cognitive interviewing designs. The TQF is rooted in the belief that cognitive interviewing and all qualitative research methods must be: credible, analyzable, transparent, and useful.
Qualitative Research: What is the Total Quality Framework?Roller Research
A brief discussion of the Total Quality Framework, a paradigm-neutral, flexible approach utilizing quality principles to develop qualitative research designs that are credible, analyzable, transparent, and useful
The document summarizes the Prior Learning Assessment and Recognition (PLAR) process for internationally-educated dietitians (IEDs) in Canada. The multi-phase process assesses applicants' academic education, practical training, and language proficiency. Eligible applicants complete a Knowledge and Competency Assessment Tool (KCAT), Performance-Based Assessment (PBA), and Jurisprudence Knowledge and Assessment Tool (JKAT). The process aims to be transparent, objective, impartial and fair while avoiding unnecessary costs and assessments for applicants.
Project output versus influence in practice: impact as a dimension of resea...Hazel Hall
This keynote presentation discusses research impact and its measurement in the field of library and information science (LIS). The presentation makes several key points: LIS impact takes many forms; measuring research impact is challenging due to issues like attribution of outcomes; research impact matters and is increasingly being used to measure research quality; and various strategies can be used to extend the reach of research outcomes, like employing action research approaches and targeting dissemination. The presentation also discusses themes around measuring impact found in the LIS literature and provides examples of approaches that can improve research impact in practice based on preliminary findings from the RiLIES research project.
Money, Money, Money, Money – Grant Writing Tips to Help Make Your World Go Roundccpc
Nikki Siercks
Monroe High School/LAUSD (Retired)
Grant writing should not be a mystery. This workshop will show you where to find a grant application, how to successfully approach the application, break it down, and understand what the grantor is looking for, and how to tell your story in a clear, compelling manner.
This document provides tips for successful grant writing, including reading the request for proposal carefully, doing research on the funding agency, tying your proposal to student outcomes, keeping writing concise and error-free, collaborating with other organizations, including detailed budgets and sustainability plans, and providing any requested supplementary materials.
The document provides tips for grant writing, including how to prepare by knowing your organization, customers/audience, and potential funding sources. It outlines key elements of a successful grant proposal such as the summary, introduction, problem statement, objectives, methods, evaluation, future funding plan, and budget. The tips advise grant writers to present their organization's mission and needs in a compelling way to the specific funding source and ensure all elements of the proposal support and are consistent with each other.
This presentation will walk you through the basics of grant writing, from researching funders to signing the gift agreement.
Presented on April 6, 2011 by Victoria Lebron at Teachers College Columbia University's Gottesman libraries in Russell Hall.
This is a challenging task indeed. Many organisations are faced with the prospect of hiring a grant writer as part of their staffing complement or in engaging a professional grant writer on a contract basis.
This document summarizes a workshop on grant writing. It provides an overview of the grant writing process, including identifying mentors, developing a timeline, understanding the various sections of a grant such as specific aims and research strategy, and common pitfalls. It also describes the NIH K43 Emerging Global Leader Award, a mentored career development award for early career scientists from low and middle income countries. The workshop aims to demystify grant writing and provide insights on what grant reviewers look for in a successful proposal.
This session is all about efficient grant writing and how to make the most of the proposals you write. First, we’ll look at the broad concepts of grant writing – what to do and what not to do in terms of background, writing style, timing, etc. Then we’ll take an in-depth look at each of the proposal’s sections with an eye toward creating content that puts your agency in the best light.
The document discusses the grant writing and proposal submission process. It covers the initial steps such as identifying needs, potential funders, and drafting the proposal. It then describes the typical elements of a grant proposal like the cover letter, abstract, goals/objectives, budget, and evaluation plan. The document concludes by discussing the competitive review process, potential rejection, and using feedback to improve future proposals.
This document provides tips for successful grant writing. It outlines preparing to write a grant by knowing your organization, customers, and audience. This includes understanding your organization's mission, programs, staff, as well as the demographics and needs of those served. It also suggests researching the grant funding source by understanding their goals and past funding. The document provides a checklist of essential grant elements like a summary, problem statement, objectives, methods, evaluation, and budget. It concludes with tips for following up after applying for a grant.
Find out how to go "behind the curtain" and capture the attention of grant funders. These tips are guaranteed to improve your grant writing skills! | www.YourGrantAuthority.com
This document provides tips for writing successful grant applications. It recommends defining the need you want the grant to address, researching how funding would help solve the problem, and modeling your program after ones with proven results. For the greatest chance of success, clearly outline the issue being addressed, how the need was determined, and how activities will impact the community while allowing results to be measured and the project sustained after funding ends. Research potential funders using the websites listed to find opportunities that align with your proposed work.
The document provides statistics on the representation of African American and Latino students and workers in STEM fields. It shows that only 13% of 4th grade African American students and 12% of 4th grade Latino students score proficient or above in science and math. It also notes that African Americans and Latinos make up only 33% of the STEM workforce despite earning 70% above the national income average in those fields.
Class assignment designed to engage students about grant proposals. This presentation, coupled with Grant Proposal Synopsis(other attached file), details a grant proposal I constructed that aids in the health of low-income children from the Appalachian region.
The document provides tips for writing an effective grant proposal, including following an ideal flow and structure. It recommends stating the need, identifying your solution and project plan, and backing it up with details. Key components of the proposal narrative are the statement of need, project plan with goals and objectives, activities, timeline, evaluation plan, project and organizational budgets, and conclusion. The document emphasizes thinking like the funder, clearly presenting outcomes, and developing relationships with funders over time.
This document provides tips for writing a successful grant application. It recommends starting with a clear idea or problem to address, preparing goals and a project plan, asking others for help, carefully reading guidelines, using clear and concise language, being realistic in scope but ambitious in vision, considering sustainability, catching the reader's attention with the title, and being prepared to revise and resubmit applications if not funded initially. Past examples of both failed and successful grant attempts are also listed.
The document provides an overview of LinkedIn and tips for using the professional networking platform. It discusses why LinkedIn is a useful tool, its key features for personal, professional, and marketing uses. These include building profiles, finding jobs, recruiting employees, advertising and generating leads. Best practices are outlined such as optimizing profiles with relevant keywords, engaging with groups, and keeping ads concise. The presentation aims to help users maximize their LinkedIn experience.
This document provides an overview of how to write a winning grant proposal. It discusses the key components of a proposal including an abstract, statement of need, objectives, methods, evaluation plan, future funding sources, budget, and management plan. It emphasizes that grant proposals require thorough research on the problem and solution, clear and measurable objectives, and a detailed budget and evaluation plan. Successful proposals stand out from others by demonstrating a strong understanding of the issues and how the proposed project will address them.
How to Make Awesome SlideShares: Tips & TricksSlideShare
Turbocharge your online presence with SlideShare. We provide the best tips and tricks for succeeding on SlideShare. Get ideas for what to upload, tips for designing your deck and more.
The document outlines the DECIDE framework for guiding evaluations. The framework consists of 6 steps: 1) Determine goals, 2) Explore questions, 3) Choose approach and methods, 4) Identify practical issues, 5) Decide how to deal with ethical issues, and 6) Evaluate, analyze, interpret and present data. Key aspects of each step are discussed such as determining evaluation goals, choosing appropriate evaluation designs that consider threats to validity, and ensuring reliability, validity and scope when analyzing and presenting results.
This document summarizes the results of a mapping study about methods for capturing usability requirements. The study analyzed 150 publications and selected 29 based on inclusion criteria. Most methods elicit usability requirements after functional requirements, and guidelines are not defined in a way that end-users can understand. Few approaches deal with usability at early stages or provide precise notations. The quality of selected publications was generally good, though more work is needed on usability in model-driven development contexts. The authors plan to develop a framework and transformation rules to elicit usability requirements earlier and integrate them into analysis and design models.
Measuring the impact of integrated systems research
Panel Speakers: Vincent Gitz, Natalia Estrada Estrada Carmona, Monica Biradavolu and Karl Hughes. Measuring the Impact of Integrated Systems Research (September 27, 2021 – September 30, 2021). Three-day virtual workshop co hosted by the CGIAR Research Programs on Water Land and Ecosystems (WLE); Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA); Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM); and SPIA, the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment of the CGIAR. The workshop took stock of existing and new methodological developments of monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment work, and discussed which are suitable to evaluate and assess complex, integrated systems research.
The overlaps between Action Research and Design ResearchSandeep Purao
Cole, R. , Purao, S., Rossi, M., Sein, M. 2005. Being Proactive: Where Action Research meets Design Research. International Conference on Information Systems. (ICIS) Las Vegas, NV, December 11-14. Originally presented at ICIS.
This document provides an introduction to standards-based curriculum integration. It recognizes that integrated curriculum can tap into student motivation and engage students in meeting aligned standards and assessments. Project-based learning is discussed as engaging students in complex, real-world problem solving. The continuum of integration is explained, from single subject to complex conceptual integration. Quality criteria for integrated lessons and projects are shared. Effective integrated planning principles are outlined, including defining essential questions, performance assessments, and industry partnerships. Integrated projects should be standards-driven, inquiry-based, authentic, and personalized. The importance of unpacking standards and using verbs that indicate mastery is emphasized. Performance mapping is introduced as a way to create integrated lessons that align to scope and sequence.
This presentation will walk you through the basics of grant writing, from researching funders to signing the gift agreement.
Presented on April 6, 2011 by Victoria Lebron at Teachers College Columbia University's Gottesman libraries in Russell Hall.
This is a challenging task indeed. Many organisations are faced with the prospect of hiring a grant writer as part of their staffing complement or in engaging a professional grant writer on a contract basis.
This document summarizes a workshop on grant writing. It provides an overview of the grant writing process, including identifying mentors, developing a timeline, understanding the various sections of a grant such as specific aims and research strategy, and common pitfalls. It also describes the NIH K43 Emerging Global Leader Award, a mentored career development award for early career scientists from low and middle income countries. The workshop aims to demystify grant writing and provide insights on what grant reviewers look for in a successful proposal.
This session is all about efficient grant writing and how to make the most of the proposals you write. First, we’ll look at the broad concepts of grant writing – what to do and what not to do in terms of background, writing style, timing, etc. Then we’ll take an in-depth look at each of the proposal’s sections with an eye toward creating content that puts your agency in the best light.
The document discusses the grant writing and proposal submission process. It covers the initial steps such as identifying needs, potential funders, and drafting the proposal. It then describes the typical elements of a grant proposal like the cover letter, abstract, goals/objectives, budget, and evaluation plan. The document concludes by discussing the competitive review process, potential rejection, and using feedback to improve future proposals.
This document provides tips for successful grant writing. It outlines preparing to write a grant by knowing your organization, customers, and audience. This includes understanding your organization's mission, programs, staff, as well as the demographics and needs of those served. It also suggests researching the grant funding source by understanding their goals and past funding. The document provides a checklist of essential grant elements like a summary, problem statement, objectives, methods, evaluation, and budget. It concludes with tips for following up after applying for a grant.
Find out how to go "behind the curtain" and capture the attention of grant funders. These tips are guaranteed to improve your grant writing skills! | www.YourGrantAuthority.com
This document provides tips for writing successful grant applications. It recommends defining the need you want the grant to address, researching how funding would help solve the problem, and modeling your program after ones with proven results. For the greatest chance of success, clearly outline the issue being addressed, how the need was determined, and how activities will impact the community while allowing results to be measured and the project sustained after funding ends. Research potential funders using the websites listed to find opportunities that align with your proposed work.
The document provides statistics on the representation of African American and Latino students and workers in STEM fields. It shows that only 13% of 4th grade African American students and 12% of 4th grade Latino students score proficient or above in science and math. It also notes that African Americans and Latinos make up only 33% of the STEM workforce despite earning 70% above the national income average in those fields.
Class assignment designed to engage students about grant proposals. This presentation, coupled with Grant Proposal Synopsis(other attached file), details a grant proposal I constructed that aids in the health of low-income children from the Appalachian region.
The document provides tips for writing an effective grant proposal, including following an ideal flow and structure. It recommends stating the need, identifying your solution and project plan, and backing it up with details. Key components of the proposal narrative are the statement of need, project plan with goals and objectives, activities, timeline, evaluation plan, project and organizational budgets, and conclusion. The document emphasizes thinking like the funder, clearly presenting outcomes, and developing relationships with funders over time.
This document provides tips for writing a successful grant application. It recommends starting with a clear idea or problem to address, preparing goals and a project plan, asking others for help, carefully reading guidelines, using clear and concise language, being realistic in scope but ambitious in vision, considering sustainability, catching the reader's attention with the title, and being prepared to revise and resubmit applications if not funded initially. Past examples of both failed and successful grant attempts are also listed.
The document provides an overview of LinkedIn and tips for using the professional networking platform. It discusses why LinkedIn is a useful tool, its key features for personal, professional, and marketing uses. These include building profiles, finding jobs, recruiting employees, advertising and generating leads. Best practices are outlined such as optimizing profiles with relevant keywords, engaging with groups, and keeping ads concise. The presentation aims to help users maximize their LinkedIn experience.
This document provides an overview of how to write a winning grant proposal. It discusses the key components of a proposal including an abstract, statement of need, objectives, methods, evaluation plan, future funding sources, budget, and management plan. It emphasizes that grant proposals require thorough research on the problem and solution, clear and measurable objectives, and a detailed budget and evaluation plan. Successful proposals stand out from others by demonstrating a strong understanding of the issues and how the proposed project will address them.
How to Make Awesome SlideShares: Tips & TricksSlideShare
Turbocharge your online presence with SlideShare. We provide the best tips and tricks for succeeding on SlideShare. Get ideas for what to upload, tips for designing your deck and more.
The document outlines the DECIDE framework for guiding evaluations. The framework consists of 6 steps: 1) Determine goals, 2) Explore questions, 3) Choose approach and methods, 4) Identify practical issues, 5) Decide how to deal with ethical issues, and 6) Evaluate, analyze, interpret and present data. Key aspects of each step are discussed such as determining evaluation goals, choosing appropriate evaluation designs that consider threats to validity, and ensuring reliability, validity and scope when analyzing and presenting results.
This document summarizes the results of a mapping study about methods for capturing usability requirements. The study analyzed 150 publications and selected 29 based on inclusion criteria. Most methods elicit usability requirements after functional requirements, and guidelines are not defined in a way that end-users can understand. Few approaches deal with usability at early stages or provide precise notations. The quality of selected publications was generally good, though more work is needed on usability in model-driven development contexts. The authors plan to develop a framework and transformation rules to elicit usability requirements earlier and integrate them into analysis and design models.
Measuring the impact of integrated systems research
Panel Speakers: Vincent Gitz, Natalia Estrada Estrada Carmona, Monica Biradavolu and Karl Hughes. Measuring the Impact of Integrated Systems Research (September 27, 2021 – September 30, 2021). Three-day virtual workshop co hosted by the CGIAR Research Programs on Water Land and Ecosystems (WLE); Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA); Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM); and SPIA, the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment of the CGIAR. The workshop took stock of existing and new methodological developments of monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment work, and discussed which are suitable to evaluate and assess complex, integrated systems research.
The overlaps between Action Research and Design ResearchSandeep Purao
Cole, R. , Purao, S., Rossi, M., Sein, M. 2005. Being Proactive: Where Action Research meets Design Research. International Conference on Information Systems. (ICIS) Las Vegas, NV, December 11-14. Originally presented at ICIS.
This document provides an introduction to standards-based curriculum integration. It recognizes that integrated curriculum can tap into student motivation and engage students in meeting aligned standards and assessments. Project-based learning is discussed as engaging students in complex, real-world problem solving. The continuum of integration is explained, from single subject to complex conceptual integration. Quality criteria for integrated lessons and projects are shared. Effective integrated planning principles are outlined, including defining essential questions, performance assessments, and industry partnerships. Integrated projects should be standards-driven, inquiry-based, authentic, and personalized. The importance of unpacking standards and using verbs that indicate mastery is emphasized. Performance mapping is introduced as a way to create integrated lessons that align to scope and sequence.
Class 6 research quality in qualitative methods 3 2-17tjcarter
This document discusses key ethical issues and methodological considerations for conducting Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) research. It outlines assumptions of qualitative research designs, including that they seek to understand meaning and experience rather than generate generalized knowledge. It also discusses eight stages of formative research to generate options and assess interventions. The document emphasizes rigor in qualitative research through credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. It explores mixed methods approaches and priorities for integrating qualitative and quantitative methods.
The document provides an overview of key concepts in research methodology. It discusses definitions of research, objectives of research such as gaining new insights or testing hypotheses. It covers research design principles like defining variables and controlling for extraneous factors. It also outlines different research designs for exploratory, descriptive and experimental studies. Sample design concepts involving probability and non-probability sampling are presented. Methods of primary data collection like observation, interviews and questionnaires are explained. Finally, it provides guidance on constructing questionnaires and successful interviewing techniques.
Systems analysis involves separating a business system into subsystems and examining the parts in detail. A systems analyst performs tasks grouped into 5 areas as part of analyzing a system. These include planning the approach, gathering information, interpreting the information, specifying requirements, and producing reports. The analysis aims to understand objectives, constraints, potential problems, and information needs to prepare an effective analysis.
The document discusses software project management. It defines what a project and project management are, and describes the key characteristics of a software project. It outlines several software development lifecycles and methodologies including waterfall, prototype, spiral, agile, Scrum, extreme programming (XP), and rapid application development (RAD). It also discusses software project roles, risk management, project monitoring, defining a lifecycle model, software team organization structures, communication and coordination practices, and factors to consider when selecting a lifecycle model.
The document describes a design study methodology for developing interactive visualizations to support personalization of health data for patients and users. It involves 3 phases - a pre-condition phase to understand the domain through literature review and expert input, a condition phase to design and implement visualization prototypes through an iterative user-centered process, and a post-condition phase to deploy and validate the solutions. The methodology supports achieving the objectives of understanding healthcare needs, designing interactive visualizations, and validating the solutions with experts.
This document provides an overview of quantitative research, including its key characteristics, strengths, weaknesses, and types. It discusses how quantitative research uses numbers and statistical analysis to make generalizations about variables. The strengths include reliability and validity, while weaknesses include cost, time requirements, and limiting results to what is proved or unproved. The types of quantitative research designs covered are experimental (pre-experimental, quasi-experimental, true experimental) and non-experimental (survey, correlational, ex-post facto, comparative, evaluative, methodological). Examples of different quantitative research methods are also provided.
AGU Evaluation Impact Workshop - December 2015Bradford Davey
Technology for Learning Consortium presents their Evaluation Impact Workshop at the AGU Fall Meeting in conjunction with the NASA Astrobiology E/PO Lead
What is program evaluation lecture 100207 [compatibility mode]Jennifer Morrow
The document discusses what program evaluation is, including defining it as the systematic collection of information about program activities, characteristics, and outcomes to improve effectiveness and inform decision making. It also outlines the types and purposes of evaluation, how to prepare for and conduct an evaluation by developing a logic model and methodology, and important considerations around data collection, analysis, and ethics.
The document discusses various models for assessing learning outcomes and evaluating educational programs, including the CIPP, Kirkpatrick, Moore, and Miller models. It summarizes the key aspects of each model and notes their strengths and limitations. For example, it indicates that outcome-based models may provide limited usefulness on their own and that new models are needed that incorporate both processes and outcomes. The document also discusses the importance of rigorous assessment instruments to the success of evaluations and notes attributes such as reliability, validity, and responsiveness that high-quality instruments should possess.
Microsoft power point makingsenseofsensemakerGlobalGiving
This document summarizes a project that used SenseMaker, a participatory storytelling and analysis method, to evaluate development initiatives in Kenya funded by the GlobalGiving crowdfunding platform. Over 2,700 stories were collected from community members about their experiences. Analysis of these stories using SenseMaker software revealed stark differences compared to self-reports and expert perspectives, providing new insights. GlobalGiving and participating organizations aim to refine this approach and use it as an ongoing feedback and learning tool.
This document describes a challenge to develop a system to connect patients and stakeholders with researchers. It provides criteria for evaluating proposed conceptual models or prototypes for a matching system. The challenge aims to facilitate meaningful engagement throughout the research process, as required by PCORI funding announcements. Winners will receive $10,000 or $40,000 to further develop their proposal. The submission deadline is April 15th, with winners to be announced at a spring conference. The evaluation will focus on technical feasibility, usability, scalability, and maximizing patient-centeredness and scientific rigor.
SMART Learner FormPSL Scientific Merit Action Research Te.docxrosemariebrayshaw
SMART: Learner Form
PSL Scientific Merit Action Research Template (SMART) Form (Research Plan)Scientific Merit Process
Learners who are doing action research for their dissertation will use this form to go through the process of scientific merit review. The goals of this process are: (1) to facilitate the planning of the details of your action research project, (2) to ensure that the proposed project has rigor and allows for scientific merit review, and (3) to facilitate your progress through the dissertation. This is not an addition to your dissertation but a step to assist you in obtaining mentor, committee, school, and IRB approval more efficiently. You must obtain mentor, committee, and school approval of your research plan before submitting your IRB application.Scientific Merit Criteria The following criteria will be used to establish scientific merit. The purpose of the review will determine if the proposed project: 1. Contributes to society by improving a practice.2. Documents need for change by utilizing evidence-based needs assessment.3. Meets certain “hallmarks” of a good action research project including:· Action research design:· Practical.· Participatory.· Defined action plan.Scientific Merit ApprovalYour completed SMART form will be approved, not approved, or deferred for major or minor revisions. Your committee will use a checklist to determine if the study meets the criteria for scientific merit and the committee will provide specific feedback designed to identify any issues related to the scientific merit that must be resolved. You will have up to three opportunities to submit this form for committee approval.
Obtaining scientific merit approval does not guarantee you will obtain IRB approval. The IRB review will focus on ethical issues. A detailed ethical review will be conducted during the process of IRB approval.Recommendations for How to Use This FormThe SMART form is intended to help you and your mentor plan the design and details of your dissertation. Once your mentor approves your SMART form, your entire committee will review the form for scientific merit. After the entire committee approves your SMART form, it will be submitted for school approval. It is recommended that you use this form in a step-by-step way to help plan your design. Expect that you will go through a few revisions before your mentor and committee approve this form.
Tips for filling out the SMART form:
· Prepare your answers in a separate Word document for ease of editing and revision.
· Copy and paste items into the right-hand fields when they are ready.
· Retain the descriptions in the left column.
· Keep the form unlocked for ongoing editing and revision.
· Leave no blank spaces in the form. If an item does not apply to your study, type “NA” in its field.
· Read the item descriptions carefully. Items request very specific information. Be sure you understand what is asked (Good practice for your IRB application!).
· Use primary sources to the .
Similar to Grant Writing Lecture, Style and Composition (20)
What Next: When You are not Funded on the First Round - 2023UCLA CTSI
CTSI R Workshop: What Next: When You are not Funded on the First Round.
Scott G. Filler, MD
Professor of Medicine at Lundquist Institute/Harbor-UCLA and UCLA
Leader, CTSI Pilot Translational and Clinical Studies Program
Co-Leader, CTSI KL2 Institutional Development Core
How to Write the “Specific Aims” Section - 2023UCLA CTSI
CTSI R Workshop: How to Write the “Specific Aims” Section of a Grant Application.
Tannaz Moin, MD, MBA, MSHS
Associate Professor of Medicine at UCLA
AssociateDirector, UCLA Specialty Training and Advanced Research (STAR) Program
How to Structure the “Approach” Section (Basic Science)UCLA CTSI
CTSI R Workshop: How to Structure the “Approach” Section of a Grant Application
Scott G. Filler, MD
Professor of Medicine at Lundquist Institute/Harbor-UCLA and UCLA
Leader, CTSI Pilot Translational and Clinical Studies Program
Co-Leader, CTSI KL2 Institutional Development Core
How to Craft the "Significance” & "Innovation" [Filler] - 2023UCLA CTSI
CTSI R Workshop: How to Craft the "Significance” & "Innovation" Sections of a Grant Application.
Scott G. Filler, MD
Professor of Medicine at Lundquist Institute/Harbor-UCLA and UCLA
Leader, CTSI Pilot Translational and Clinical Studies Program
Co-Leader, CTSI KL2 Institutional Development Core
How to Craft the "Significance” & "Innovation" - 2023UCLA CTSI
This document provides guidance on key sections of an NIH R01 grant application, including Significance, Innovation, and review criteria. It discusses that Significance refers to how the project will advance scientific knowledge or improve clinical practice if successful, not just the importance of the disease topic. Reviewers evaluate the rigor of prior research supporting the project and the applicant's plans to address weaknesses. Innovation can involve novel concepts, approaches, technologies, or new applications of existing methods. The simplified NIH review framework focuses on whether the proposed research should be conducted based on Significance and Approach.
A Tactical Approach to Writing Your Grant Application (HSR) - 2023UCLA CTSI
CTSI R Workshop: A Tactical Approach to Writing Your Grant Application (HSR)
Tannaz Moin, MD, MBA, MSHS
Associate Professor of Medicine at UCLA
Associate Director, UCLA Specialty Training and Advanced Research (STAR) Program
A Tactical Approach to Writing Your Grant Application - 2023UCLA CTSI
CTSI R Workshop: A Tactical Approach to Writing Your Grant Application
William Parks, PhD
Professor of Medicine at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and UCLA
Associate Dean for Graduate Research Education
Scientific Director, Women’s Guild Lung Institute
How to Write the “Specific Aims” Section of a Grant Application (Basic Scienc...UCLA CTSI
CTSI R Workshop: How to Write the “Specific Aims” Section of a Grant Application (Basic Science
Scott G. Filler, MD
Professor of Medicine at Lundquist Institute/Harbor-UCLA and UCLA
Leader, CTSI Pilot Translational and Clinical Studies Program
Co-Leader, CTSI KL2 Institutional Development Core
How to Anticipate and Plan for an R Grant Application - 2023UCLA CTSI
CTSI R Workshop: How to Anticipate and Plan for an R Grant Application.
Presented by Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH
Barbara A. Levey MD & Gerald S. Levey MD Endowed Chair
Chief, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research
Professor of Medicine and Public Health at UCLA
Leader, UCLA CTSI Workforce Development
NIH Loan Repayment Program (LRP) Info Session - 9/26/23UCLA CTSI
The UCLA CTSI and DGSOM Office of Physician Scientist Career Development held this webinar to provide information on the NIH Loan Repayment Program (LRP). This funding is designed to recruit and retain highly qualified health professionals into biomedical or biobehavioral research careers. The LRPs counteract financial pressure by repaying up to $50,000 annually of a researcher's qualified educational debt in return for a commitment to engage in NIH mission-relevant research.
Writing the NIH K Award – Research Plan
Presented by
Sumeet S. Chugh, MD
Price Professor and Associate Director, Smidt Heart Institute
Director, Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Considerations in Applying for a K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence"...UCLA CTSI
Considerations in Applying for a K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence"
Presented by Christopher Evans, PhD
Professor of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences at UCLA
Co-Director, UCLA CTSI KL2 Program
Navigating the NIH K Award Process and Choosing Your Mentorship Team (2023)UCLA CTSI
Navigating the NIH K Award Process and Choosing Your Mentorship Team
Presented by
Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH
Barbara A. Levey MD & Gerald S. Levey MD Endowed Chair
Professor of Medicine and Public Health at UCLA
Chief, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research
Leader, UCLA CTSI Workforce Development
K Awards – Common Pitfalls and UCLA CTSI KL2 Resources (2023)UCLA CTSI
K Awards – Common Pitfalls and UCLA CTSI KL2 Resources
Presented by Elizabeta Nemeth, PhD
Professor of Medicine at UCLA
Director, UCLA Center for Iron Disorders
Co-Director, UCLA CTSI KL2 Program
Writing the NIH K Award – Candidate Information and Career Development Plan, ...UCLA CTSI
Writing the NIH K Award – Candidate Information and Career Development Plan,
How Reviewers Evaluate K Awards, and Common Critiques from NIH K Study Sections
Presented by O. Kenrik Duru, MD, MSHS
Professor of Medicine at UCLA
Investigator (Disparities), UCLA CTSI Special Populations
How to Anticipate and Plan for an R Grant Application. (2022)UCLA CTSI
Carol Mangione provides strategies for early career researchers to successfully transition from a K award to an R01 grant. She emphasizes building relationships at NIH, identifying the best fitting funding opportunities, and making the most of preliminary K award research. Researchers should publish findings, present at conferences, and collaborate with senior scientists. When preparing an R01 application, researchers should clearly outline the proposed project based on significant preliminary findings and check that the research aims have not already been funded.
K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence"UCLA CTSI
UCLA CTSI K Workshop - July 28, 2022
Considerations in Applying for a K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence" presented by Dr. Christopher Evans, PhD
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
The chapter Lifelines of National Economy in Class 10 Geography focuses on the various modes of transportation and communication that play a vital role in the economic development of a country. These lifelines are crucial for the movement of goods, services, and people, thereby connecting different regions and promoting economic activities.
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxEduSkills OECD
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
This presentation was provided by Racquel Jemison, Ph.D., Christina MacLaughlin, Ph.D., and Paulomi Majumder. Ph.D., all of the American Chemical Society, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
3. The Three C’s
Clear
Don’t make reviewers work to understand you
Complete
Some reviewers may not be experts in your
field. Don’t assume knowledge.
Convincing
Reviewers believe your proposal is important,
and that you can do it.
5. Getting Started
Understand what grant-making entity
wants to know
–Read RFA/PA
–Note review criteria
• Special review criteria, if any
• Key phrases
6. Basic Structure of
NIH Research Project
– Specific Aims
• 1 page
– Research Strategy
• 6 or 12 pages
7. Standard Review Criteria
Significance: Why is this important?
Innovation: How is this different from
everything else that has
been done or tried?
Investigators: Can you pull this off?
Approach: How do you plan to do this?
Environment: Can you do it here?
8. Location of Review Criteria
in Proposal
• Narrative
– Specific Aims Page
• Summarize significance, innovation, investigator, approach
– Research Plan
• Significance
• Innovation
• Approach
• Other components of the application
– Biosketches (Investigators)
– Facilities/Resources/Support (Environment)
9. Excerpt of NIH U54 Instructions
A. Overview of the Proposed Center (12 pages)
Provide the overall objectives of the Center, including the short-
and long-term goals. Describe how the Center's expertise,
capabilities, partnerships, and resources will enable it to have
a significant influence on accelerating the pace and increasing
the probability of success for discoveries and innovations being
developed into commercial products. Provide a detailed
description of the Center’s leadership team.
Describe the criteria used to select the partners and the
qualities and strengths that each Partner brings to the Center.
Describe how the Center will facilitate and promote interaction
with existing institutional and government programs.
The application should include a plan for transition of the
Center to a self-sustainable architecture.
10. Outline with Expanded
Review Criteria
• Short- and Long-Term Goals
– (really Specific Aims)
• Significance
• Innovation
• Leadership
– Expertise & Capabilities
• Partnerships
– Expertise, Capabilities and Resources they bring
• Interactions with Existing Entities
– Capabilities and Resources they bring
• Approach: Methods to Achieve the Goals
11. Hierarchy:
Numbering and Fonts
C. APPROACH
C.1. AIM 1: DEFINE THE STRUCTURAL
VARIATION IN PARVOVIRUS CAPSIDS
C.1.1. Brief summary of the literature and
preliminary results
NIAID
13. Specific Aims
• Do the aims address interesting and
significant issues?
• Are they hypothesis-based?
• Are they "win-win" — will an outcome
consistent with the null hypothesis still be
a contribution to the field?
NINDS Checklist
14. Specific Aims Example
Aim 1: Develop algorithms for C. elegans viability assays to
identify modulators of pathogen infection
Aim 2: Develop algorithms for C. elegans lipid assays to identify
genes that regulate fat metabolism
Aim 3: Develop algorithms for gene expression pattern assays to
identify regulators of the response of the C. elegans host to
Staphyococcus aureus infection
Aims are related, but not dependent
Each aim is a concrete objective
http://www.niaid.nih.gov/researchfunding/grant/documents/wahlbyresplan.pdf
16. Specific Aims Page Outline
Introductory paragraph
– Summarize knowledge
– Identify gap/need
– Identify problem associated with gap/need
Second paragraph
– Introduce project designed to address gap
– Identify long-range goal
– Introduce qualifications of team
Specific Aims
– Summarize what they will do and exactly what they will
expect to find
Conclusion
– Emphasize significance and goals
17. Specific Aims Page:
Introductory Paragraph
Microscopy has emerged as one of the most
powerful and informative ways to analyze cell-based,
high-throughput screening samples in experiments
designed to uncover novel drugs and targets. (1) However,
many diseases and biological pathways can be better
studied in whole animals—particularly diseases that
involve organ systems and multicellular interactions, such
as metabolism and infection. (2) The worm C. elegans is a
well-established and effective model organism that can be
robotically prepared and imaged, but existing image-
analysis methods are insufficient for most assays. (3)
1) Summarizes knowledge
2) States a need
3) Identifies a problem to be solved
Source: NIAID
18. Specific Aims Page Outline
Introductory paragraph
– Summarize knowledge
– Identify gap/need
– Identify problem associated with gap/need
Second paragraph
– Introduce project designed to address gap
– Identify long-range goal
– Introduce qualifications of team
Specific Aims
– Summarize what they will do and what they expect to find
Conclusion
– Emphasize significance and goals
19. Specific Aims Page:
Second Paragraph
We propose to develop algorithms for the analysis of
high-throughput C. elegans images, validating them in three
specific experiments to identify chemicals to cure human infections
and genetic regulations of host response to pathogens and fat
metabolism. (1) Novel computational tools for automated image
analysis of C. elegans assays will make whole-animal screening
possible for a variety of biological questions not approachable by
cell-based assays. (2) Building on our expertise in developing
image processing and machine learning algorithms for high-
throughput screening, and on our established collaborations
with leaders in C. elegans research, (3) we will carry out the
following aims:
1) Project designed to address gap
2) Long-range goal
3) Introduce qualifications of team Source: NIAID
20. Specific Aims Page Outline
Introductory paragraph
– Summarize knowledge
– Identify gap/need
– Identify problem associated with gap/need
Second paragraph
– Introduce project designed to address gap
– Identify long-range goal
– Introduce qualifications of team
Specific Aims
– Summarize what they will do and exactly what they expect
to find
Conclusion
– Emphasize significance and goals
21. Specific Aims Page:
Aim 1
Aim 1: Develop algorithms for C. elegans viability assays to
identify modulators of pathogen infection
Challenge: To identify individual worms in thousands of
two-dimensional brightfield images of worm populations
infected by Microsporidia, and measure viability based on worm
body shape (live worms are curvy whereas dead worms are
straight) What expect to find
Approach: We will develop algorithms that use a probalistic
shape model of C. elegans learned from examples, enabling
segmentation and body shape measurements even when worms
touch or cross. What they plan to do it
Impact: These algorithms will quantify a wide range of
phenotypic descriptors detectable in individual worms, including
body morphology as well as subtle variation in reporter signal
levels.
Source: NIAID
22. Specific Aims Page Outline
Introductory paragraph
– Summarize knowledge
– Identify gap/need
– Identify problem associated with gap/need
Second paragraph
– Introduce project designed to address gap
– Identify long-range goal
– Introduce qualifications of team
Specific Aims
– Summarize what they will do and exactly what they expect
to find.
Conclusion
– Emphasize significance and goals
23. Specific Aims Page:
Concluding Paragraph
In addition to discovering novel anti-infectives and genes
involved in metabolism and pathogen resistance, (1) this
work will provide the C. elegans community with (a) a versatile,
modular, open-source toolbox of algorithms readily usable by
biologists to quantify a wide range of important high-
throughput whole-organism assays, (b) a new framework for
enhancing morphological features from C. elegans populations
for quantitative analysis of this organism, and (c) the capability
to discover disease-related pathways, chemical probes, and
drug targets in high-throughput screens relevant to a variety of
diseases. (2)
1) Goals
2) Significance and Innovation
Source: NIAID
24. Location of Review Criteria
Introductory paragraph (Significance)
– Summarize knowledge
– Identify gap/need
– Identify problem associated with gap/need
Second paragraph (Significance, Innovation,
Investigators)
– Introduce project designed to address gap
– Identify long-range goal
– Introduce qualifications of team
Specific Aims (Approach)
– What will do and exactly what they expect to find.
Conclusion (Significance, Innovation)
– Emphasize significance and goals
25. Summary Statement
• Impact Score: 10
• Comments:
– Reviewers are confident the project will be
implemented as planned
– Will result in a very useful tool
– Significant and timely questions are posed
– Plan includes many challenging and innovative
components
– Very strong team with complementary expertise
and record of successful collaboration
– Open source tools add value to the project
26. Emphasis & Readability
• Use bold, italics and underlining for
emphasis
• Use white space for readability
• Use graphics to illustrate concepts
28. Voice
• Active Voice
– Actor-Action-Object of action
–Trainees attend meetings about clinical
trials.
• Passive Voice
–Object of action-Action-Actor
–Meetings about clinical trials are
attended by trainees.
29. Active Voice
• Livelier and easier to read
• Often uses fewer words
• Science Magazine guidelines
–Use active voice when suitable
–“We constructed a λZap library “ not “A
λZap library was constructed”
• It is OK to use “I” or “We”
– See handout
30. Passive Voice
• When the actor is not important
–“Design effects are used to create an
effective sample size.”
• Draw attention to the object of the
action
–“The victim was struck in the early
morning hours.”
32. Voice
Joseph Williams, Columbia University lecture, 2008
Analyses for the effects reported in this
study are of two kinds. (Passive; 12
words)
We can analyze our results in one of two
ways. (Active; 10 words)
33. Clarity: Antecedent Problem
Ambiguous
My sandwich was in my lunchbox, but now it’s
gone.
Clear
My sandwich was in my lunchbox, but now my
sandwich is gone.
The Elements of Style
Solution: Replace the pronoun with the noun
35. Clarity: Antecedent Problem
Ambiguous
The lab has tissue samples from 20 women frozen
in a tank.
Clear
The lab has tissue samples from 20 women. The
samples are frozen in a tank.
The Elements of Style
Solution: Make two sentences
36. Parallel Structure
Pairs of ideas joined by “and,” “or,” or “but,” should have the
same pattern.
• Mary likes swimming, running and jumping.
– Same verb form
• Job growth is up, and the deficit is down.
– Subject-verb
• Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo is expected to seek changes
to teacher evaluations and to charter school limits
– Prepositional phrase
37. Parallel Structure
The Elements of Style
Formerly, science was taught by the textbook
method, while now the laboratory method is
employed.
38. Parallel Structure
Before
After
-Subject-verb-phrase
The Elements of Style
Formerly, science was taught by the textbook method,
while now the laboratory method is employed.
Formerly, science was taught by the textbook method; now
science is taught by the laboratory method.
39. First Draft
Either the congeners (1) themselves have
direct and permanent effects upon the
central nervous system, or there (1) may be
a retardation of the metabolism of ethanol
by the congeners (2) so that it (3) has a
stronger effect.
Joseph Williams, Columbia University lecture, 2008
40. First Draft
Either the congeners (1) themselves have
direct and permanent effects upon the
central nervous system, or there (1) may be
a retardation of the metabolism of ethanol
by the congeners (2) so that it (3) has a
stronger effect.
(1) No parallel structure
(2) Passive voice
(3) Ambiguous antecedent
Joseph Williams, Columbia University lecture, 2008
41. Edits
Either the congeners themselves have
directly and permanently affect effects upon
the central nervous system, or there may be
a retardation of the metabolism of the
congeners (1) cause the body (2) to
metabolize ethanol more slowly by the
congeners so that the ethanol (3) has a
stronger effect affects the nervous system
more strongly.
(1) Establish parallel structure
(2) Change to active voice
(3) Antecedent is clear
Joseph Williams, Columbia University lecture, 2008
42. Revised Text
Either the congeners themselves directly
and permanently affect the central nervous
system, or the congeners (1) cause (2) the
body to metabolize ethanol more slowly so
that the ethanol (3) affects the nervous
system more strongly.
(1) Parallel structure
(2) Active voice
(3) Clear antecedent
Joseph Williams, Columbia University lecture, 2008
45. Omit Needless Words*
In the event that we envision only positive future selves, we
may not accurately gauge our chances at success, or
properly prepare ourselves for obstacles. (25 words)
* William Strunk Jr.
46. Edits
Before
In the event that we envision only positive future selves, we
may not accurately gauge our chances at success, or
properly prepare ourselves for obstacles. (25 words)
If n the event that we envision only positive future selves,
we may inflate not accurately gauge our chances for at
success, or and fail to properly prepare ourselves for
obstacles.
After
If we envision only positive future selves, we may inflate our
chances for success and fail to prepare for obstacles. (20)
47. Example #2
There is growing evidence to suggest that there are
unique risk factors that are unique to truants. (17
words)
48. Edits
Before
There is growing evidence to suggest that there are unique
risk factors that are unique to truants. (17 words)
There is g Growing evidence to suggests truants that there
are face unique risk factors that are unique to truants.
After
Growing evidence suggests truants face unique risk factors.
(8 words)
*William Strunk Jr.
49. Avoid Alphabet Soup
CTSI, a research partnership of UCLA,
CSMC, CDU and LA Biomed, is funding
pilots with LAC DHS and LAC DPH.
NLRs, analogous to TLRs, contain LRRs for
sensing PAMPs.
51. Commas and Semi-colons
Separate words, phrases or clauses in a series with
commas
Please record subjects’ age, race or ethnicity, gender,
and blood pressure.
Semi-colons bring order to lists that contain
commas
Study sites are Olive View, a county hospital; UCLA;
Methodist, a community hospital; and USC.
Avoids ambiguity
52. Amplify a thought in a sentence
Los Angeles is the largest county in the U.S.— it is
larger than 42 states.
Set off parenthetical phrase
Young adults ages 18–24—a group known as
“Young Invincibles”—face a high risk of motor
vehicle fatalities.
Makes sentence easier to read
The Dash
53. Hyphens
Hyphens are connectors
• List your long- and short-term goals.
• Team-based approach
Hyphens affect meaning
• Spanish-language interpreter vs. Spanish
language interpreter
No hyphen with words that end in -ly
• Publicly traded company
54. Odds & Ends
No apostrophe for plural numbers & abbreviations
• I’ve been working on this problem since the early
1970s.
• These courses are for MDs.
Apostrophes indicate possession
• The PhD’s notebook is on the counter.
Commas in dates
• May 10, 2013 (comma between day and year)
• May 2013 (no day, no comma)
55. Effective Grant Writing
• Clear: Your writing conveys exactly
what you mean to reviewers
• Complete: Your writing completely
expresses your idea and
responds to the RFA
• Convincing: Your writing excites
reviewers about the value
of your proposal
59. For Your Bookshelf
• “Eats, Shoots & Leaves” by Lynne Truss
– Punctuation
• “On Writing Well” by William Zinsser
– General writing advice
• “Elements of Style” by William Strunk and E.B. White
– Grammar and usage
• “10 Lessons in Clarity and Grace” by Joseph Williams
– Sentence construction
• Chicago Manual of Style
– Authoritative technical guide
• Purdue Owl
– Online grammar, punctuation and usage guide