Tudorza Pressair®
  (aclidinium bromide)

By Katrina Korn
3rd-Year Professional Pharmacy Student
kkorn@purdue.edu
Learning Objectives
   State the mechanism of action for
    Tudorza Pressair® (aclidinium bromide)
   Provide information on indication, dosing
    and side effects for aclidinium to patients
    and professionals
   Discuss advantages and disadvantages
    of aclidinium with reference to clinical
    trials results
   Formulate an opinion regarding this
    drug’s impact on clinical practice.
   List important patient counseling points
    for aclidinium
Background1,2
   Dry-powder inhaler

   Marketed by Forrest Labs, Inc.

   Indication: FDA-approved in July 2012
    for maintenance treatment of COPD
    bronchospasms
Mechanism of Action1,2
 Reversible, long-acting muscarinic
  antagonist (anticholinergic)
 Blocks M3 receptors in bronchiolar
  smooth muscle
 Leads to enhanced bronchodilation
 Decreased bronchospasms
Dosing1
   400 mcg twice daily via oral inhalation

   Each puff delivers 400 mcg of
    medicine
Side Effects1
 Paradoxical bronchospasm
 Dry mouth
 Constipation
 Worsening narrow-angle glaucoma
 Worsening urinary retention
ACCORD COPD 13
   Phase III, 12-week, double-
    blind, randomized multicenter clinical trial
   Compared twice-daily 200 mcg
    aclidinium, daily 400 mcg aclidinium, and
    placebo
   Outcomes: change from baseline in
    trough FEV1, COPD symptoms
   Results: both active groups showed
    improvement in FEV1, similar adverse
    events compared to placebo
   Comments: mean age 64 years, smoking
    status unknown, longer studies needed
ATTAIN4
   24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled
    trial
   Compared twice-daily 200 mcg aclidinium vs.
    twice-daily 400 mcg aclidinium vs. placebo
   Outcomes: mean change in trough
    FEV1, COPD symptoms
   Significant improvement in FEV1 and
    symptoms compared to placebo
   SE were low and similar to placebo for both
    groups
   Comments: Smoking status unknown, not
    comparative
Clinical trial comparing Spiriva®
(tiotropium) to aclidinium5
   Phase IIa randomized, double-blind, double-
    dummy crossover trial
   Tiotropium 18 mcg vs. aclidinium 400 mcg vs.
    placebo
   15-day trial
   Outcomes included change in peak FEV1 and
    change in FEV1 AUC
   Showed greater improvement in FEV1 AUC
    values for aclidinium over tiotropium
   COPD symptom scores improved with
    aclidinium but not tiotropium
   Comments: short, small study, symptom
    scoring system unknown, FEV1 AUC not
    standard
Clinical trial comparing
 Spiriva® to aclidinium2,3,4,5
               aclidinium          Spiriva®      ipratropium
 Advantages Improved FEV1 more studies,            Cost, well-
              over Spiriva,    currently first-   studied and
                  lower      line long-acting characterized,
              incidence of       cholinergic      available in
             Anticholinergic antagonist for combination with
               side effects    COPD, once           albuterol
              compared to       daily dosing
                   both
Disadvantage cost ($261 for         more        anticholinergic
     s        one device),    anticholinergic side effects, four
               twice daily       side effects     times daily
              dosing, 400       compared to          dosing
             mcg twice daily      aclidinium
               vs. 18 mcg
             once daily for
Impact on Practice
 Currently would argue against
  formulary so it is not used as first-line
  agent
 Consider using in patients who are on
  combo therapy including
  corticosteroids who are not
  experiencing relief
 Consider using in patients who cannot
  tolerate anticholinergic side effects
 High cost, generic a possibility
Patient Counseling1
 Inhalation technique – dry-powder
  inhaler
 Dose counter decreases by ten
 Not a rescue inhaler – use twice every
  day
 Smoking cessation
 Difficult urination, blurry vision,
  bronchospasm
 Discard after 45 days
 Pregnancy category C
References
1. CenterWatch. Drug Information. Available at:
http://www.centerwatch.com/drug-information/fda-approvals/drug-
details.aspx?DrugID=1211. Accessed September 13, 2012.

2. TUDORZA PRESSAIR®. [package insert]. St. Louis, MO: Forrest Labs, Inc. ;
2012.

3. Kerwin EM, D’Urzo AD, Gelb AF, et al. Efficacy and safety of a twelve-week
treatment with twice-daily aclidinium bromide in COPD patients. (ACCORD
COPD 1). [abstract]. COPD 2012 Apr;9(2):90-101.
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.ezproxy.lib.purdue.edu/pubmed/2232014>.
Accessed September 15, 2012. PMID:22320148.

4. Jones PW, Singh D, Bateman ED, et al. Efficacy and safety of twice-daily
aclidinium bromide in COPD patients: The ATTAIN study. [abstract]. Eur Respir J
2012 Mar 22. [Epub ahead of print].
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.ezproxy.lib.purdue.edu/pubmed?term=efficacy%20
of%20aclidinium%20bromide%2024-week>. Accessed September 15, 2012.
PMID: 22441743.

5. Fuhr R, Magnussen H, Sarem K, et al. Efficacy of aclidinium bromide 400 μg
twice daily compared with placebo and tiotropium in patients with moderate to
severe COPD. [abstract]. Chest 2012 Mar;141(3):745-52.
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.ezproxy.lib.purdue.edu/pubmed/21903737>.
Questions?

Tudorza Pressair® (Aclidinium Bromide)

  • 1.
    Tudorza Pressair® (aclidinium bromide) By Katrina Korn 3rd-Year Professional Pharmacy Student kkorn@purdue.edu
  • 2.
    Learning Objectives  State the mechanism of action for Tudorza Pressair® (aclidinium bromide)  Provide information on indication, dosing and side effects for aclidinium to patients and professionals  Discuss advantages and disadvantages of aclidinium with reference to clinical trials results  Formulate an opinion regarding this drug’s impact on clinical practice.  List important patient counseling points for aclidinium
  • 3.
    Background1,2  Dry-powder inhaler  Marketed by Forrest Labs, Inc.  Indication: FDA-approved in July 2012 for maintenance treatment of COPD bronchospasms
  • 4.
    Mechanism of Action1,2 Reversible, long-acting muscarinic antagonist (anticholinergic)  Blocks M3 receptors in bronchiolar smooth muscle  Leads to enhanced bronchodilation  Decreased bronchospasms
  • 5.
    Dosing1  400 mcg twice daily via oral inhalation  Each puff delivers 400 mcg of medicine
  • 6.
    Side Effects1  Paradoxicalbronchospasm  Dry mouth  Constipation  Worsening narrow-angle glaucoma  Worsening urinary retention
  • 7.
    ACCORD COPD 13  Phase III, 12-week, double- blind, randomized multicenter clinical trial  Compared twice-daily 200 mcg aclidinium, daily 400 mcg aclidinium, and placebo  Outcomes: change from baseline in trough FEV1, COPD symptoms  Results: both active groups showed improvement in FEV1, similar adverse events compared to placebo  Comments: mean age 64 years, smoking status unknown, longer studies needed
  • 8.
    ATTAIN4  24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial  Compared twice-daily 200 mcg aclidinium vs. twice-daily 400 mcg aclidinium vs. placebo  Outcomes: mean change in trough FEV1, COPD symptoms  Significant improvement in FEV1 and symptoms compared to placebo  SE were low and similar to placebo for both groups  Comments: Smoking status unknown, not comparative
  • 9.
    Clinical trial comparingSpiriva® (tiotropium) to aclidinium5  Phase IIa randomized, double-blind, double- dummy crossover trial  Tiotropium 18 mcg vs. aclidinium 400 mcg vs. placebo  15-day trial  Outcomes included change in peak FEV1 and change in FEV1 AUC  Showed greater improvement in FEV1 AUC values for aclidinium over tiotropium  COPD symptom scores improved with aclidinium but not tiotropium  Comments: short, small study, symptom scoring system unknown, FEV1 AUC not standard
  • 10.
    Clinical trial comparing Spiriva® to aclidinium2,3,4,5 aclidinium Spiriva® ipratropium Advantages Improved FEV1 more studies, Cost, well- over Spiriva, currently first- studied and lower line long-acting characterized, incidence of cholinergic available in Anticholinergic antagonist for combination with side effects COPD, once albuterol compared to daily dosing both Disadvantage cost ($261 for more anticholinergic s one device), anticholinergic side effects, four twice daily side effects times daily dosing, 400 compared to dosing mcg twice daily aclidinium vs. 18 mcg once daily for
  • 11.
    Impact on Practice Currently would argue against formulary so it is not used as first-line agent  Consider using in patients who are on combo therapy including corticosteroids who are not experiencing relief  Consider using in patients who cannot tolerate anticholinergic side effects  High cost, generic a possibility
  • 12.
    Patient Counseling1  Inhalationtechnique – dry-powder inhaler  Dose counter decreases by ten  Not a rescue inhaler – use twice every day  Smoking cessation  Difficult urination, blurry vision, bronchospasm  Discard after 45 days  Pregnancy category C
  • 13.
    References 1. CenterWatch. DrugInformation. Available at: http://www.centerwatch.com/drug-information/fda-approvals/drug- details.aspx?DrugID=1211. Accessed September 13, 2012. 2. TUDORZA PRESSAIR®. [package insert]. St. Louis, MO: Forrest Labs, Inc. ; 2012. 3. Kerwin EM, D’Urzo AD, Gelb AF, et al. Efficacy and safety of a twelve-week treatment with twice-daily aclidinium bromide in COPD patients. (ACCORD COPD 1). [abstract]. COPD 2012 Apr;9(2):90-101. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.ezproxy.lib.purdue.edu/pubmed/2232014>. Accessed September 15, 2012. PMID:22320148. 4. Jones PW, Singh D, Bateman ED, et al. Efficacy and safety of twice-daily aclidinium bromide in COPD patients: The ATTAIN study. [abstract]. Eur Respir J 2012 Mar 22. [Epub ahead of print]. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.ezproxy.lib.purdue.edu/pubmed?term=efficacy%20 of%20aclidinium%20bromide%2024-week>. Accessed September 15, 2012. PMID: 22441743. 5. Fuhr R, Magnussen H, Sarem K, et al. Efficacy of aclidinium bromide 400 μg twice daily compared with placebo and tiotropium in patients with moderate to severe COPD. [abstract]. Chest 2012 Mar;141(3):745-52. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.ezproxy.lib.purdue.edu/pubmed/21903737>.
  • 14.