Tsar Nicholas II Under The October Manifesto

Tsar Nicholas II Under The October Manifesto
The State Dumas were an elected legislative body that were to serve as a lower parliament. They were started by Tsar Nicholas II under the October
Manifesto, a document written after the increasing pressure of the 1905 Revolution, this document promised more civil liberties, and the introduction
of a duma, under the influence of Sergei Witte, the chief minister. The four dumas ran between April 1906 and February 1917 and Nicholas II opposed
a duma from the start, and most decisions came to the Tsar and his council. Even though not much came of the dumas, they were still important and a
change in the way how Russia was run.
The First Duma, which was established after a promise in the October Manifesto to start a duma, first met in May 1907,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Tsar Nicholas The Great Essay
Gapon himself doubted about the reasonability of the decision to bring crowds of people onto the streets of the capital, but his lieutenants had
persuaded him to do so. So, on January the 9th a huge procession of workers, most of them women and children, singing patriotic song moved
toward the Winter Palace. Out of nowhere, the officials had mobilized large forces of troops under the command of Grand Duke Vladimir, the Tsar's
uncle. The troops had commanded the procession to turn around and return to their homes. The workers did not intend to obey those commands,
military forces tried to push the crowd out, but they did not succeed. They started the fire, a shower of riffle fires flew at the crowd, while Cossacks
massacred innocent people with their whistling nagaikas. From two hundred to fifteen hundred people had died that day. The Tsar as the father of his...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Did he see his troops shooting people down? Did he try to stop them from those immoral actions and judgements? The history answers "no!" At the
time when all that had happened, Nicholas resided at Tsarskoe Selo. The police reported him that they had saved him from the danger, that troops
had had to fire to defend the palace. It sounds oblivious. Nicholas had a chance to face his loyal subjects, who walked with open heart to him, and
be close to his people, to realize his dream of "the tsar and the people." If you want to be people's leader you must not ignore them. The people's
leader must face his subjects showing his good will and understanding, be able to indicate that he wills to side with and be there for them. Everybody
does mistakes, you cannot insure from them. But, this particular made people hostile against Tsarist regime, they could not forgive it. They wanted to
see a strong Tsar standing in front of them, ready to hear them out, but they saw a man who hid in Starskoe Selo and who lacked the control over the
officials. The time for the changes had

Why Did Tsar Nicholas II Survive The 1905 Revolution
Tsar Nicholas II and 1905 Revolution
The Tsar (Nicholas II) survived the 1905 revolution. However, the revolution in 1917 did remove him from power. When asking why Nicholas II
survived 1905 there are numerous factors to examine. Both revolutions had extremely similar conditions. Levels of dissatisfaction, strikes and the
country moving towards a wartime economy are all examples. It is also important to see small differences which gave the two events such contrasting
outcomes and determined the survival and the fall of the Tsar.
In February 1904 war broke out between Russia and Japan over a town called Manchuria situated in Northern China. After suffering a humiliating
defeat in the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They are cheating thee concerning the real state of affairs. The people believe in thee."
Following this act the city started going on strike, the Tsar tried to reason with the workers by saying he would establish an elected assembly to assist
the government in their decisions. The strikes continued until Nicholas was forced to act. The people realised, after being fired upon, that their faith in
the Tsar was ill founded.
The same conditions did not exist in 1917. The people were under no illusion as to how the Tsar felt about them. During the February Revolution,
strikers carried slogans such as "Down with the autocracy" written on them. With no support from the masses, Nicholas II had lost a key ally in his
battle to remain in power.
On the 30th of October he issued the 'October Manifesto', this proved enough to satisfy many, especially the middle class who withdrew their
support for the strike leading to its collapse. The apparent release of some of his total power proved to be crucial to the Tsar's survival, as the people
would not have rested had there been concessions. The 'October Manifesto' promised the following:–
1) Guaranteed freedom of speech
2) Freedom from arrest without due cause

3) An elected Duma (parliament) with power to make laws
4) Legal political parties were allowed
Though the promised elections did take place, the

Tsar Nicholas II Research Paper
The extent of the old orders refusal to accept reform lead to the outbreak of revolution in Russia. It stemmed from the social order in Russia with the
emergence of middle classes, the gaining of intelligence among the lower classes and the privilege for so few. The appalling living conditions,
coupled with food shortages along economic systems including the collection of taxes and increasing international commitments and pressures lead to
the downfall of the Tsarist regime. Tsar Nicholas II faced opposition from philosophers and revolutionaries during his reign; it was a very challenging
time to be leader.
The emergence of the middle classes rose after Alexander II emancipated the serfs in 1861. The Tsar may have provided freedom, but it came at a
cost as they were taxed heavily for living on what was meant to be there land. They were only given strips of land and it was unable to sustain a
family. The living conditions were so hard that the people's faith in the Tsar were slowly fading. Many... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There was also the mass increase in the population especially amongst the lower classes and the slow beginnings of industrialization found the lower
classes thinking more about their misfortunes. The Russo–Japanese war, which should have had the country rallying together ended up by being an
embarrassing loss. It highlighted the governments and the Tsars incompetence and this only fuelled the social unrest. This war also put a strain onRussia
's purse. The strikes that followed put the government under pressure and reform was desperately needed. This helped to fuel the revolution of 1905
when the workers went to present a petition to the Tsar, they thought by doing this peacefully that he would ease their troubles, unfortunately the
soldiers fired upon the petitioners who were also made up of women and children. The response to this was one of outrage throughout Russia and
strikes and riots

In Yekaterinburg Russia, Tsar Nicholas II and his family were executed on July 17 1918, bringing an end to the three
–century–old Romanov dynasty.
They were murdered by Bolshevik troops led by Yakov Yurovsky , the commandant of The House of Special Purpose.
Following WWI, sever strain was placed on Russia's weak government and economy, resulting in mass shortages and hunger. The people and soldiers
turned against the Tsar, losing faith in his authority and power due to the mismanagement and failure of the war, his decision to take personal
command of the army seemed to make him responsible for the defeats. Discontent grew amongst the people where they In March, growing civil unrest
and discontentment erupted into open revolt and strikes in Petrograd, forcing the abdication of Nicholas II (1868–1918), the last Russian czar. The
Duma then assumed control and declared a provisional government. Eight months later, the radical Bolshevik party seized power from the Provisional
government.
The royal family who once ruled Russia had become pawns in the political ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The other executioners then began shooting chaotically until all the intended victims had fallen. The last to die were his daughters Tatiana, Anastasia,
and Maria, who were carrying a few pounds of diamonds sewn into their clothing, providing them with protection from the first round of bullets.
However, they were speared with bayonets soon after.
It is unlikely that Yakov Yurovsky acted on his own initiative and it has been documented that the order to assassinate the Imperial family came from
Sverdlov, a Bolshevik party administrator and chairman of the 'All Russian Central Executive Committee' in Moscow and had been initiated by
Vladimir Lenin

The Failure Of Tsar Nicholas II Of Russia
Tsar Nicholas II of Russia, the ruling Tsar for 23 years, once said: "There is no justice among men." (BrainyQuote,2017). Nicholas II was the famous
last Tsar of Russia when he abdicated power to the Provisional Government in 1917. The Russian Revolution was a catalyst for major world events
and changes that took place in the 20th century. Tsar Nicholas II ofRussia was only 26 years old when he took the throne from his father, Alexander III
of Russia (Newworldencyclopedia.org, 2017). There was a series of events leading up to this overthrow of the established monarchy.World War Iwas
among the most significant of these. Prior to WWI, Russia had already suffered a number of military failures. These include the war with Japan in
1904–1905; which was a distinguished failure (Newworldencyclopedia.org, 2017). Not only was the Russo–Japanese War a military disaster, but it was
also an economic failure for Russia. The war was meant to create a patriotic fervor and unite the citizens around Tsar Nicholas II; however, it had the
opposite effect (History Learning Site, 2016). Following the failed war, Tsar Nicholas II promised the people he would introduce reforms concerning
the people's needs. The reforms the Tsar made did nothing to help and this was only aggravated by Russia's shortcomings in Austria–Hungry and the
growing agricultural failures the serfs were facing. Russia had far less superior weapons and the gap between Russian industry and the rest of the
world was

The Abdication of Tsar Nicholas II was a Turning Point for...
To what extent was the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II the key turning point in Russia's political development 1856–1964?
From 1856 onwards the aim of turning Russia from a once agrarian, illiterate and backwards country and into a political superpower was set. A
multitude of developments began with Nicholas II being a catalyst of change for the Russian people. Writers of Marxist Russia such as Joan Hasler1
however believe that the Tsars abdication merely prevented revolution happening for a few years. The significance of his abdication caused
demands for a new and improved governmental structure to be in place in order to get Russia back on its feet after the devastating defeat in world
war one. New political developments took place after the abdication of the Tsar including a new improved Duma who quickly realised they had little
trust and loyalty to the tsar and decided to take it upon themselves to improves Russia on their own. Nearing the end of the Romanov dynasty there
were 3 new political groups aiming to rule Russia, the duma, the Bolsheviks and the soviets which alone gives us significant evidence that the Tsars
reign and abdication created a significant turning point in the political development 1856–1964.
Nicholas' abdication on March 2nd 1917 sparked the point of political change for Russia. The majority of these changes began as a result of opposition
towards his inability to reign as an effective ruler. After his abdication his brother refused the throne

How Did Tsar Nicholas II Create A Backwards Economy Of Russia
Introduction:
Unlike other countries having a democratic government, Russia was ruled by a monarchy, therefore Nicholas II inherited the role of Tsar after his
father passed away from kidney inflammation in 1894. There were many reasons behind why Russia was considered as having a backwards economy
and the Russo–Japanese War was a major setback for Russia. Bloody Sunday took place and shortly afterwards Nicholas II was compelled to introduce
the October Manifesto ... . Nicholas II
Tsar Nicholas II was a problem for the social, political and economic well being of the early Twentieth Century Russia.
Russia's backwards economy:
Nicholas II was raised watching his father rule autocratically. He was not prepared by no means to rule, and most likely took this as the best approach
to ruling a country since it is how his father did.
Tsar Nicholas II refused to stray from what he knew, and more importantly what his father practised as an autocrat whilst... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
With no workers, Russia was put under pressure as this meant no transport, schools, shops and factories were in working order. They banded together
for many destructive acts such as rioting, stealing, street performances and destroying Tsarist authoritative symbols. This was a political issue for
Russia as workers were fighting for their rights.
October Manifesto:
Nicholas II introduced the October Manifesto on the 30th of October, 1905. Once the October Manifesto was introduced to the people, they
believed he was making a step in the right direction. This piece of paper, written by Sergey Witte, promised political reforms after ten months of
strikes, a lot of political debate and attacks of violence. Little did the people of Russia realise that this was the Tsar Nicholas II's plan to please,
however he had no intentions of acting on this or changing his ways.
Link

The Occurrence of the 1905 Revolution and the Ineptitude...
The Occurrence of the 1905 Revolution and the Ineptitude of Tsar Nicholas II
The 1905 Revolution in Russia occurred because of a variety of long and short term causes, which led to the Tsar to lose the support of his people.
These causes comprised of the economic hardship in Russia, the refusal of the government to broaden their representation, the military failure, and the
mishandling of the 1905 crisis, "Bloody Sunday." However, the underlying factor in all of these causes is the ineptitude of Tsar Nicholas II, as he held
supreme autocratic power, and so would have been able to avoid revolution by permitting reforms. Therefore, although there were many other issues
which provoked the idea of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Village councils, Zemstvas, were set up, and these were very successful; they organized transport of food etc. The Zemstvas success offered a more
attractive alternative to the government, which was previously unthought–of concept. The fact that people discovered an alternative to the Tsar's
government demonstrates the ineptitude of Nicholas II as he allowed the situation to escalate with minimal interference, and his people gained power
to help themselves out of poverty. The economic problems therefore led to the politicization of the Russian people.
However, after giving the Russian people the power to help themselves through the famine, the Tsar's government remained absolutely unwilling to
compromise their position. The refusal of the government to broaden their representation increased criticism of the Tsar, which could have been
avoided. The Zemstvas requested that they be consulted and allowed to express their views on matters, but Nicholas refused to comply. Instead he
relied on a system of repression to quiet the newly politicized Russia. Protesters were harshly beaten by the police, and student protesters had their
Universities closed and many were forced to spend time in the army. In a bid to divert the blame, the Tsar and his government attempted to encourage
Russian people to blame the

Tsar Nicholas II
There had always has been controversies over Nicholas II as to whether he had been a great ruler for Russia. But now, as the issues in Europe rise, the
controversies buzzes again back to life.
Born May 6, 1868, Nicholas inherited the Russian throne when Nicholas II's father, Tsar Alexander III, died of kidney disease on October 20, 1894.
On May 26, 1896, Nicholas II and Princess Alexandra of Hesse–Darmstadt were crowned Tsar and Tsarina in an old Ouspensky Cathedral in Moscow.
A reason why Nicholas was thought to be unsuitable to be a ruler was because Nicholas was only 26 when his father died and he was not fully trained
and prepared to rule Russia as he said, "I am not ready to be the Tsar. I never wanted to become one. I know nothing of... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Alexandra was also the granddaughter of Queen Victoria. Alexandra wanted to convince people that she was more Russian than the Russians so she
accepted the Orthodox faith and she was a strong supporter of Russification. She was a very devoted wife as she helped her husband rule when he
was away and she spent a lot of time with her family at home. Alexandra knew that she was meant to be with Nicholas as she wrote, "The emperor,
unfortunately, is weak, but I am not and I intend to be firm," in 1905. Alexandra wanted a male heir to inherit the Romanov Dynasty. Later, she ended
up having a son named Alexei.
Alexei suffered from hemophilia and was helped by a man named Gregory Rasputin. Rasputin quickly became very close to Alexandra. And because of
this Rasputin, he was able to advise and influence Nicholas through Alexandra as she dismissed the ministers and their deputies. Rasputin became
Alexandra's adviser. There had been rumours on both of them and controversies.
Though it seems as if the debate on this issue will never die, Nicholas II was thought as an unsuitable ruler for many reasons such as unreadiness, lack
of dominance and desire, and having an unopen mind, but despite these, people still looked up to him as he did something. We have yet to see what
Nicholas would do to take action in the matters of

Downfall Of Tsar Nicholas II Essay
The downfall of Tsar Nicholas II was hurried by the First World War, as although it wasn't the only factor in his downfall it did tarnish his name
causing the Russian people to lose hope for their Emperor and Autocrat. Leading up to the First World War there were many issues that the Tsar had
not dealt with, military, political, economic and food, which with a strong leader they would have endured during the war, but as his name became
tarnished so did the peoples ideals of him. This essay will show that without the First World War the Tsar Nicholas II would still have been able to rule
with a country that would have supported him, or at least seriously delayed the revolution. The beginning of the Russian peoples disdain for their
leader was... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The rate of deaths of officers in the army meant that men from the ranks were being promoted, but these men felt loyal to their soldiers rather than
the Tsar. The army was also a place were Russian soldiers were becoming radicalized as many different Russians of different classes were fighting
in this war, meaning support of the Tsar was declining. The Russians were immensely unorganized during the war as serious food shortages came
into effect as factories were only reducing weapons now, wounded men were left at railway stations in Petrograd without help, and councils took on
the role of providing troops with supplies and medicine which dampened their confidence in the Tsar. This doubt was furthered when the Tsar took
personal leadership of the war subsequently making him responsible for all the failings during the war in the eyes of the Russians. The Tsar's image
was also hindered because of his wife, the Tsarina Alexandra, who was German and thought to be a spy, she was close friends with Rasputin, the mad
monk, who was said to have an influence over her, but he was accused of drunkenness and sleeping with women on the board, so was not seen as good

The Main Reasons For The Fall Of Tsar Nicholas II In 1917
Was the impact of WW1 the main reason for the fall of Tsar Nicholas II in 1917?
The fall of the Romanov Dynasty in 1914 proved that the Tsar could not handle the problems of Russia. Ironically, he would have been ideal as a
constitutional monarch, but was adamant against the idea. As the First World War startedRussia's problems arises, from short–term and long–term
causes. The war brought back inflation which led to "demonstrations over food shortages combined with workers' grievances," (Hosking, 2012, p.
91) thus this destroyed Nicholas's image as Father of Russia. Military became ineffective as the transport system was not adequate, thus leading to
food supplies decreasing in key cities such as Petrograd. Historians believe the impacts of the First World War led to Russian society becoming
unstable and was ultimately the main reason of the downfall of the Tsar. However other factors, such as the Tsarina placing large amounts of trust
into Rasputin who was notorious for his reputation as an alcoholic and a womanizer (Westwood, 2002, p. 215) and the role of the revolutionaries due
to Lenin promising peace, land and bread, eventually leading to the growth of the Bolsheviks Party. Although, it can most rightfully be deemed that
the impact of the war was the main reason for the fall of Tsar Nicholas II in 1917.
The First World War was seen as a devastating impact on Tsardom and is seen as the main reason for the fall of Tsar Nicholas II in 1917. "The effect of
the war was

Nicholas II was the Last Tsar in a long line of Russian rulers. Nicholas II's grandfather, Alexander II, was a very liberal Tsar. During his reign,
Alexander II's most notable achievements were that he liberated the serfs, and his Emancipation Edict, which gave twenty million peasants freedom
and one third of their landlords' land. However, when Nicholas was a young boy, Alexander II was assassinated. This made Nicholas's father,
Alexander III, furious. Alexander III figured that since Alexander II had been a liberal Tsar and was assassinated, the only way to keep control was
to rule with an iron fist. And so he did. However, Nicholas II was very meek. WouldRussia fare well with such a meek Tsar after Alexander III's harsh
rule? Inept leadership ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Nicholas was pushed into invading Manchuria because people underestimated Japan's power. The indecisive Tsar "was pushed into seizing lands in
Manchuria, having been assured that little Japan would not dare attack Russia.... He was assured that the Japanese did not know how to fight. His
ministers argued over how many Japanese soldiers it took to equal one Russian soldier–two or one and a half." Nicholas and his government's
overconfidence in their ability to defeat Japan showed their lack of understanding of the world. Nicholas blindly followed whatever people told him
without thinking for himself. Nicholas was told that Japan was incapable of defeating Russia, but that turned out to be false. After seizing lands in
Manchuria, "Japanese forces in Manchuria defeated the Russians in the largest land battle of the war, a bitter 12–day struggle that cost Russia 60,000
dead and wounded, 8,000 missing, and 21,000 prisoners." These tremendous losses in such a short period of time showed Nicholas's inability to
lead. The Russian people followed Nicholas into a war that they were led to believe would be short and easy. This war cost Russia its pride, Nicholas
his people's faith, and many people their lives. The Minister of Internal Affairs pushed Nicholas into invading Manchuria in order to keep the Russian
people from revolting.

The Romanov's Revolutionary Attempt At Modernizing Russia
Russian Revolution "We no longer have a Tsar. Today a river of blood divides him from the Russian people. It is time for the Russian workers to
begin the struggle for the people's freedom without him. For today I give you my blessing. Tomorrow I shall be with you. Today I am busy working
for our cause". Russian Priest, Father Georgy Gapon, conveys his thoughts in a letter read at the meeting of liberals, after the tragic petition of Bloody
Sunday. The Romanov's dynasty attempt at modernizing Russia led to the cause of their usurping. The changes they applied during their reigns resulted
in protests and uprisings of the peasants. The emancipation edict of 1891 created a great number of unemployed civilians; as population was increasing
during ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Threatened by the event Bloody Sunday, Tsar Nicholas II faced the choice of military dictatorship or granting a new constitution. In the end, he
determined to write a new constitution called the October Manifesto. Issued and signed by the Tsar, he promised to guarantee civil liberties as his last
venture to continue his family's history of unlimited autocracy. When the document was signed, it rested the anger most Russian civilians had for their
Tsar. Although, the public was not pleased when it came to their attention that the Duma could not initiate legislation and Tsar would continuously
dissolve the Dumas when they opposed him. One can see the contrast between the Tsar's doing and his peoples needs, even after protests. In conclusion,
the indifference brought upon the monarchy's abdication and advanced in the outcome of the Bolshevik

Tsar Nicholas Ii
Nicholas II abdicated the throne in 1917 up until then, the Russian Royal family had ruled for over three hundred years. Throughout this period, they
faced many problems and uneasy predicaments, a lot of these centering on Nicholas II as Tsar. A combination of long and short
–term problems led to
the decline and eventual fall of the Romanov dynasty. Tsar Nicholas II ignored these issues, staying true to his coronation vow to uphold Autocracy,
and therefore played a critical role in the plummet of the Empire.
A flaw in Tsar Nicholas II Autocratic style of ruling was his conflicting personality. He was a family orientated man, and they often took priority over
ruling and looking after his country especially his son, Alexei who suffered ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Russian people also resented the influence Gregory Rasputin had over Alexandra, The people viewed him as immoral and he brought huge
disrepute on the Romanov family. The impacts of The War placed an unbearable onRussia's weak government and economy, the improper handling of
these affairs turned the people against the Tsar and the growth of political opposition to the Tsar– a direct link in the downfall of the empire.
The effects of World War One on Russia were profound. Russia's once remarkable financial stability was demolished by the War, the disruption of
their transport system, the shortage in food supplies and the rapidly rising price in supplies created a foundation for a revolution, and also, a
considerable loss in confidence of the Tsar. On the 23rd February, International Women's Day, the women of Petrograd led a riot through the workers
districts. They were fed up with waiting for bread, often waiting outside bakeries overnight to be first in line. This chaotic riot turned into a revolution
when chief of the military district, General Khabalov when he ordered his troops to fire on the unarmed crowds "The chief of the military district,
General Khabalov, could not cope with the situation." The turning point of this situation was after the General issued his orders, his army refused

Was Tsar Nicholas Emperor Unfit
Tsar Nicholas II of Russia: An Emperor Unfit to Rule Ravaged Russia At the end of the nineteenth century, Tsar Nicholas II of Russia reluctantly took
command of an empire overflowing with revolutionaries who were seeking change in response to hardships that their nation was facing. His timid
personality, coupled with his lack of political education and military experience, made him unfit to calm the war–fueled chaos that would soon envelop
Russia. Nicholas' series of unfortunate, unprepared and uninformed decisions began with his marriage and eventually ended with his decision to
abandon the capital to lead his armies, ultimately leading to the demise of his imperial family's three–hundred–year dynastic tradition. The turn of the
century illuminated Russia, commonly labeled as "backwards" by the other European powers, as the last remaining European autocracy. Russian
society still operated on the estate system, which was characterized by an enormous gap between the upper class nobility and the lower class
peasantry. Peasants comprised eighty percent of the population and only a fraction were educated. They had little understanding of government and
were highly patriarchal. Many served as serfs. It was not until the 1860s that these serfs were freed from legal bondage by Nicholas' grandfather,
Alexander II. However, this was not enough to satisfy Russian citizens' newfound taste of freedom. In the years following, they demanded he establish
an elected parliament,

The First World War and the February Revolution of 1917 Essay
The First World War became the Tsars worst nightmare. Russia joined the war in many ways to keep peoples minds of Russia's backwardness and
badly run government, and onto the war effort itself. But within the first year of the war people's minds began to wander away from troop moral and
toward the Tsar and his control.
From the go Russia was mobilized and war ready faster than the Germans and themselves expected, they was only expecting a short war. Russia had no
extended war plans of ammo, food, clothing and equipment and extremely bad organisation led to many un–necessary deaths and illnesses. They
naively thought that 7 million shells would last the whole war, but in 1916 that was just enough for 10 days. In 1914 only 41 rifles were ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
There are stories of units needing to borrow clothes from neighbouring units when the Tsar came to inspect them.
The vast majority of Russia's attacks in Germany were failures; even some of the highest–ranking Generals saw the war as complete chaos. The Army
reserves consisted of little or untrained peasants or farm hands who had no idea about being a soldier. The weather was also an unforgettable factor as
soldiers had to face freezing winters, and developed sicknesses in the masses such as Typhoid and Cholera.
Many of the Russian armies soldiers began to loose faith in the government; many of them deserted and returned home sometimes by murdering their
officers to obtain their freedom.
It was on the 22nd of August 1915 that the Tsar Nicholas the 2nd took control as head of the army and dismissed his uncle The Grand Duke Nicholai
as the previous head. This meant hat the Tsar would be away from St Petersburg, which left the Tsarina and Rasputin in charge. This was mistakes for
the Tsar as it made people see Russia's army as weak and left numerous accusations of Rasputin and the Tsarina having a relationship.
Transport was taken over by the armies needs, and food and resources often failed to reach its destination due to the badly organised and incomplete
parts of the transport system. An increase of refugees into the cities, that made city life worse, as many of the cities had a large distance from food
producing regions, this led to mass

Tsar Nicholas II And The Russo-Japanese War
The two essays I have selected take different approaches concerning Tsar Nicholas II and his decision making process. The two men take not only
different approaches to the tsar but arrive at different conclusions. Rotem Kowner's essay, Nicholas II and the Japanese body: Images and
decision–making on the eve of the Russo–Japanese War, examines Nicholas's attitude toward the Japanese and how it affected his decision. Raymond
Esthus's essay, Nicholas II and the Russo–Japanese War, shows Nicholas's commitment to autocracy and a stubborn resolve to defendRussia's honor.
Ethmus dismisses the idea of Nicholas being weak minded and easily led. It was the mismanagement of the administration that caused Nicholas to
misread the political realities the Russian nation was encountering. The Russians were not aware of the threat they were to the Japanese, as the
Russians pushed for the completion of the Trans–Siberian Railway. Russia's management of the situation was an idea of avoiding a conflict Kowner
sees the increasing strain on the relationship between Japan and Russia as the tsar "meddled with the work of the ministries in the capital." While
Ethmus sees the administration as mismanaging the situation, Kowner would agree with the tsar misreading the crisis but not where the
mismanagement came from. He places the blame directly on the tsar. "Had the tsar realized the full military potential of his enemy, Russia could have
prepared better for war, and strategic decisions, such

Was Tsar Nicholas II mainly to blame for the 1905 Revolution?
Was Tsar Nicholas II mainly to blame for the 1905 Revolution?
In 1905, the social and economic tensions building up within Russia boiled over into Revolution. It was described by Lenin as the "Great Dress
Rehearsal" for the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 and may give us clues as to why the 1917 revolution started. The suggestion that Tsar Nicholas II
and his actions were to blame for this revolution is debatable and there are many factors such as the repressive Tsarist system, the growth of
opposition from the time of Alexander II and the defeat in the war with Japan to consider. These events can be separated into short and long term
effects on the revolution. Bloody Sunday and defeat to Japan would be short term effects whereas the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Bad harvests in 1902 and 1903 brought an increase in the number of violent attacks on the landlords but Nicholas was disinclined to make any changes
to the lives of the peasants.
The strikes in the 1890s were becoming more organised as 97,000 went on strike in 1897 but Nicholas refused to do anything about the situation. He
wanted Russia to modernise as an industrial company admirably but was less concerned what impact it would have on the workers. Both the strikes and
the growth of opposition were long terms effects on the revolution.
However, Bloody Sunday which saw soldiers shooting as many as a thousand protesters in a panic, was a short term effect. It was just after a
strike involving 111,000 workers and was responded by large numbers of troops to guard public works. Although Nicholas was at the Alexander
Palace in Tsarskoye Selo, he was still heavily blamed for the deaths, perhaps unfairly as he of course did not directly order the soldiers to fire upon
the protesters. It was most likely due to the soldiers' inexperience when handling protests so they handled it as if it were a riot. Nicholas in fairness
expressed his sorrow and grievances for those that died and was persuaded to appease the workers but failed to realise the seriousness of the situation
as it led to the revolution.
The other short term cause of the revolution was the Russo–Japanese War. It was made to seem to the public that the motive for war was because Japan
attacked Port Arthur, a

Tsar Nicholas II: A Sign Of Change
A Sign of Change
Russia was struggling to keep up in the intense competition between the European countries. The agricultural economy and absolute monarchy had
caused Russia to lack far behind in modernization. Russia's absolute monarch, the Tsar, ruled over the four social class, the nobility, the clergy, the
workers and the peasants. There was an enormous gap between the upper and lower classes. The Tsar at the time, Nicholas II, dealt with this growing
problem by censoring the newspapers, oppressing the riots and banning any forming political parties. Although he tried to suppress almost all opposing
ideas, the people went on a revolution to overthrow Nicholas II. In March 1917, the people created a provisional government and forced the ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While Russia was involved with WW1, the lower class of Russia was compelled to surrender most of their rations to the military. As the upper
class ate their divine, lavish, meals, the lower class would be begging for a piece of bread in the streets. The Tsar forced the working class not
only to surrender their food, but their clothing and livestock as well. The price of food rose higher and higher as it was becoming harder on the
workers to grow grain. The suffering was felt across Russia as riots struck out with workers going on strike. When Russia made a peace agreement
with Germany, created by Lenin, they were thrown back into a civil war between the Reds and the Whites. During the Civil War between the Reds
and the Whites, the prior system in place, War Communism, was ineffective in feeding its citizens as well. The peasants that grew produce kept it
for themselves because they knew that the state would end up taking almost all of it. Foreign trade stopped because no country wanted to trade with
starvating Russia. Then, when Lenin came to power, he decided to create the Tax in Kind system that would use the state to equally distribute food.
The Tax in Kind system would collect food from farms across Russia and equally distribute it to all the people of the state. This policy would benefit
the people of Russia because, "The Tax In Kind

Tsar Nicholas II: Haemophilia
Tsar Nicholas II
Alexander III, the father of Tsar Nicholas II who was born in 1868 died 1894 which one thing led to another, Nicholas II became Tsar. Which is
another meaning for "king" The amount of power and success was unbelievable. Tsar Nicholas was almost as powerful as the medieval English
kings. Tsar Nicholas did also have a tsarina by the name of Princess Alexandra. They got 5 children but sadly one of them got sick from the common
disease back then which was Haemophilia. The disease prevented blood from clotting and that was the reason behind one of Tsars children who had to
suffer.
Nicholas wanted to rule Russia without anyone else help, Nicholas tried to rule Russia by himself. Tsar was not a very good ruler but he had his own

Tsar Nicholas I: Orthodoxy, Autocracy And Nationality
The slogan of Tsar Nicholas I was: "Orthodoxy, Autocracy, and Nationality" (Official Nationality), suggesting that he views government as something
with should be tied to Russian tradition with no room for progressivism.This slogan also suggests that he believes Orthodox Christianity and the
Russian Orthodox Church should be protected and a remain a central tenet of Russian ideology, as well as believing that there should be a strong
national spirit – both of which would influence faith in the Monarch and the ruling dynasty.
In 1848, there were several revolutions occurring in Europe (France, Italy, Germany, Austrian Empire), which intended to overthrow the ruling
monarchies and install republican governments. During 1949, Tsar Nicholas I sent in Russian troops to aid the Habsburgs in repressing uprisings and
ensuring that power remained in the hands of the Habsburg dynasty.
The Crimean War was significant as it showed that the Russian army, and by extension Russian power, was weak. This conflict revealed the
discrepancy in industrialization between ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He pardoned the Decembrist rebels, abolished corporal punishment, instituted trial by jury, relaxed censorship, chartered new industries, commissioned
a railway to the Black Sea, and liberated Russia's serfs by signing the Emancipation Manifest in 1861 as he believed that a modern, industrial society
could not run on slavery and that it was vital to protecting Russian autocracy as he believed that if the serfs are not emancipated, they would revolt
and free themselves. Most of Alexander II's policies were successful and he is remembered as one of Russia's greatest reformers, however his
intentions did not always line up with reality and his emancipation of the Serfs proved disastrous for the Russian

Why Is Tsar Nicholas II A Bad Government
Bad Government – Tsar Nicholas II
The ruler of Russia in 1905 was Tsar Nicholas II. He wanted to rule his country as an absolute Monarch. He did not want to share his power with the
parliament. Russian Kings called themselves Tsar, which means 'Emperor'. The Tsar would run on his own, assisted by a few ministers that he chooses
on his own. There was no parliament and the other people did not have any right to vote in elections. Tsars ruled in harsh manner, ruining everyone
who dared to complain.
Nicholas II was born on May 18, 1868 in Pushkin, Russia. He 'inherited' the throne from his father, Alexander III who died in 1894 due to kidney
disease at the age of 49 He was his parent's firstborn child. Nicholas II was 19 years old when he joined

1. Why did Nicholas II abdicate his throne in March 1917? The winter of 1916/1917 had a significant effect on the power of the Russian Empire.
From food shortages to enormous losses on the front, Tsar Nicholas's reign faced a crossroads; he was becoming even more unpopular among the
people. This simmering tension came to a climax on February 23rd, when textile workers went on strike and demonstrated for bread, with the
knowledge that Petrograd only had a flour supply that would last ten days. Metal workers soon followed the original demonstrators. A day later, the
estimated amount of demonstrators was around 150,000–200,000 people, making it the most massive demonstration since World War I began. The next
day, Nicholas II demanded to

The Identity Of Imperial Russia In The 19th Century
19th Century Russia Imperial Russia as an autocracy infers that the tsar and the imperial body is who determines what Russia's identity is. The 19th
century began under the leadership of Tsar Paul followed by his successors. Each of them had different visions of what Russia would become. The
Russian people also had their own idea of what the Russian path was to be. Opposition and rebellion would occur throughout the century eventually
leading to a revolution. Russia during the 19th century witnessed many historical events with varying causes; however, most can be viewed as an
attempt to discover the identity of what Russia was in respect to the rest of the world. Alexander I looked to take a different approach to the identity of
Russia. He ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The shift began with the Decembrist and the effect they had on Nicholas. Moss explained, "At the very beginning of his reign, he perceived the
Decembrist revolt as reflecting Western ideas and his crushing of it as a manifestation of loyalty to Russian ways (Moss, 356)." The actions of the
Decembrist contributed to his official philosophy which was an attempt to answer the question of, who is Russia? Nicholas I's "Russian Path" can be
explained in three terms, orthodoxy, autocracy, and nationalism. Nicholas implemented his official philosophy within the household, schools, churches
and various aspects of Russian life. He split the education system into different levels based on your loyalty to the imperial system. He opposed
radical religions and promoted orthodoxy as the true religion of Russia. For the household, he developed the imperial imagery which was displaying
how a Russian family should be. Tsar Nicholas was shown as the perfect father figure of Russia. Nicholas's domestic policies altered Russian society.
Nicholas's discontent with western ideas and influence on society were not favored by much of Russian society.
Nicholas's foreign affairs were also connected to his official philosophy. After the war with Napoleon, Russia had become the constitutional monarch of
Poland. After an attempted assassination of Grand Duke Constantine, Nicholas alters the constitutional monarchy in

Nicholas II, the last of the Romanov Tsars, was a man with good intentions for his country, however, he lacked many of the crucial attributes
necessary in being a proficient ruler. He was a weak and indecisive leader; too gentle and too uneducated to take on the role of an autocrat. Moreover,
Nicholas was heavily influenced by his wife, Tsarina Alexandra, to follow in his father's footsteps and preserve autocracy, leading to the downfall of
the 304–year reign of the Romanov family. The Tsar refused to move on with the times and his inability to rule effectively was compounded by the
burdensome events that occurred during his reign.
The initial and fundamental mistake of the Tsar was his failure to comprehend thatRussia had undergone major changes over the period of Tsarist
rule.The Empire had expanded vastly, with populations rising over 160 million, and thus, the nation's aspirations grew alongside it. Furthermore, as
quoted by Sir George Buchanan in his memoir, My mission to Russia and Other Diplomatic Memories, Russia "...had witnessed the birth of industries,
the consequent increase in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A large crowd of unarmed demonstrators led by a priest, Father Georgy Gapon, was fired upon by soldiers of the Imperial Guard as they marched
towards the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg to present a petition to the Tsar, regarding the exploitation of the working class and their demands for
compensation and improved conditions. Although the Tsar did not order the troops to act in this way, as he was not in the Winter Palace at the time,
this action lost the affection of the Russian people on their Emperor and called into question the Tsarist system for the first time. The 1905 Massacre
eventually provoked public outrage, and strikes soon spread throughout the industrial centres of Russia, crippling the

How Did Tsar Nicholas II Enter Ww2
Under the poor leadership of Tsar Nicholas II, Russia's peasants were suffering and unrest was widespread in the country. In hopes to rally the
Russian people and bring out their nationalist spirit, Tsar Nicholas II, declared war on Japan for challenging Russia for control of Korea and
Manchuria. was facing has suffered huge losses during its war with Japan. Japan defeated the Russian easily and it was a humiliating loss for the
empire. As World War exploded between Austria
–Hungary and Serbia, Russia was drawn into the war because of the alliance system, Bolsheviks and
other groups in Russia did not like the fact that Tsar Nicholas II decided to enter another costly war.
As the commoners suffered at home and the losses added up on the front,

Tsar Nicholas 1 Research Paper
"I stand here today to inform you of my motives and rationale that pushed me to become the leader that I am today after Tsar Nicholas the second
abdicated, giving Russia the chance to start fresh. I was elated by the news of the abdication of Tsar Nicholas. I strongly believe this is the best thing for
Russia and I would not have had it any other way."
"I have been questioning his methods of ruling for years now, ever since he stripped my family of my beloved brother. I had idolized my brother and
was inspired to follow his footsteps in a fight for change when the Tsar's okhrana brutality took him from me on May the 8th, 1887. I believed the Tsar
Nicholas's ruling methods to be outdated and his use of brutality and ignorance to be the cause of the minorities depression within this mislead country.
The motivation my brother's death brought to me pushed me to investigate further into politics. Here I found more unjust laws the Tsar stood by and I
decided to work hard enough to make a change." ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He executed means of giving the people what they needed and encouraging everyone to share. I looked further into this idea and the idea of
revolutionaries as I felt the Tsar was ignorant towards the population of his own country and deprived us of our every need and felt as though a
revolution could be the solution to this extensive issue. I strive to achieve peace and contentment throughout Russia and from the start I have believed
a revolution to be the way to do

Factors That Influence Tsarina Alexandra Had On Tsar...
The fall of the Romanovs can be put down to a number of factors, one of them being the influence Tsarina Alexandra had on Tsar Nicholas II. Due to
her close relationship with the Tsar she was able to influence and manipulate him in a number of ways and convinced him to hold on to his autocratic
power no matter what. As a result of her intervention she can be seen as a significant figure in the fall of the autocratic system. Her significance can
be measured by a number of factors such as her relationship with the Tsar and the influence she had over him, her relationship with the Russian people
as a result of her German roots, and finally her relationship with the monk Rasputin and the influence he had over both the Tsarina and the Tsar. The
...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although it was the Tsar's actions that lead to many riots and fuelled the fire for revolution, he made those decisions because of the Tsarina and her
influence. She had no political knowledge but that didn't stop her from getting involved, she was a firm believer that the Tsar deserved his
autocratic power and it was the will of God that he was in the position he was in. This belief led her to encourage him to ignore many people who
could have potentially helped preserve the autocratic system by helping the Tsar make sensible decisions regarding the situation at hand. The fact that
the Tsarina assumed an active political role later on and would often let Rasputin to get involved was a major factor in bringing about the fall of the
Romanovs. She was unpopular as it was, but by attempting to make such big decisions without the advice of the Duma, she was in fact destroying the
autocratic system rather than saving it as she thought she was doing. Not only did she continue to encourage the Tsar to ignore all others, she often
undermined his authority by overruling decisions made by him. By getting involved in the way she did, she only further increased her own popularity
but was also starting to unintentionally take the Tsar down with

Tsar Nicholas 'Riots Broke Out In Petrograd'
In the book Animal Farm, Mr. Jones is based off of Tsar Nicholas. Mr. Jones is the farmer/owner of Manor Farm, because he treated his animals so
badly they overthrew him and kicked him of the farm. In the novel Animal Farm, Mr. Jones is seen as Tsar Nicholas ii in that they both play the same
role in their society, they were both seen as enemies, and were against communism/ animalism.
Tsar Nicholas ii and Mr. Jones are both seen as enemies. Nicholas was Russia's last king, his people overthrew him because of his bad leadership. "The
corruption and incompetence of Nicholas' reign had shattered Russia's faith in the autocracy. Riots broke out in Petrograd, [....] a provisional
government was established and the rule of the Romanov dynasty ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Jones and Nicholas are against communism/animalism. Mr. Jones and Nicholas both didn;t prove there people/animals what they needed in order to
thrive. Nicholas wouldn't listen to his people and what they needed and wanted. "His belief in the absolute power of the monarchy resulted in
Nicholas' immediate dismissal of any proposals for more democratic forms of government. Nicholas isolated and mistrustful nature would not allow
him to compromise his own beliefs for the good of the country (ESCO)." Nicholas wouldn't give new ideas for reform a chance instead he isolated
himself from his people. "Most of this time Mr. Jones had spent sitting in the taproom of the Red Lion at Willingdon, complaining to anyone who
would listen of the monstrous injustice he had suffered in being turned out of his property by a pack of good–for–nothing animals"( Orwell 30). Mr.
Jones Spent his time complaining about what the animals did to him instead of confronting his problems. Mr. Jones believed that the animals were the
problem not how he his, even though he never feed them. Nicolas was against communism in that he never gave his people the opportunity to improve
their society with reforms. This relates to animal farm because Mr. Jones didn't consider the animals well being

Tsar Nicholas II was one of the central figures to the Russian February Revolution of 1917 and secured the downfall of the Romanov dynasty. Nicholas
II continued the regressive reforms of his father Tsar Alexander III, ultimately disenchanting the constituents from the neglect of longstanding
grievances; he epitomised the fundamental problem of absolute rule, as years of suffering would eventually lead to revolution. His mismanagement and
direct involvement in World War I undermined the already unstable government, causing his subjects to join radical movements to overthrow the tsarist
regime. The accumulation of the repressive and ineffective government policies throughout the reign of autocratic Tsar Nicholas II sparked public
discontent,

The Russian Revolution Essay
The Russian Revolution
Here are some of the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917:
~Failures in the War
~The mutiny in the Army
~The Tsarina and Rasputin
~Food Shortages
~Strikes
PREFACE:
In 1904 The Tsar of Russia (Nicholas II) embarked on a war with Japan, hoping for a quick and glorious victory that would unite the country, decrease
support for the Tsar's opponents and gain control over Korea and Manchuria. Unfortunately for the Tsar, the Japanese were well prepared, both
industrially and military. The Japanese crushed the Russian army and destroyed most of it's fleet. Damaged both militarily and industrially,Russia had
to sign a peace treaty. In 1905 the Tsar crushed the attempted revolution using... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The other reason was transporting the crop once it was harvested. ` The USA could fit into Russia two and a half times and over and Britain nearly
100 times`4, the problem with transportation was that the railroads were very often the only way to transport large amounts of goods as Russia's
conditions often made roads impassable. `By 1900 Russia had only as many miles of track as Britain`5 and Britain was 100 times smaller. This
meant that there were very large delays of delivering food and most of it rotted before even reaching town. The only way of transporting goods
from the industrial West to the unfarmable East was the Trans Siberian Express, which took more than a week to complete its journey from
Moscow to Vladivostok. During the WWI (which started in 1914), Food Shortages increased greatly because more strikes begun demanding an
end to the war. Strikes of course caused food shortages as peasants began striking and not producing any food. Also more soldiers were needed to
join the army and so the factory workers were taken to fight and peasants left the countryside to seek better jobs in factories so fewer farmers were
left to grow food. Another very important reason that caused an increase in food shortage was that ` the Russian railway system was being used to
carry supplies to the war front and so trains carrying food to the cities had been reduced`1so

Tsar Nicholas 2 Research Paper
Tsar Nicholas II, the last tsar of Russia, was overthrown in February of 1917 because he had lost the allegiance of his people. His people saw him as
unfit to rule because of the disasters his reign brought about, and with the encouragement of the Bolsheviks, he was forcibly abdicated. This revolution
was also trying to introduce a democratic government to Russia. After years of monarchy, the people wanted their voices heard. After Tsar Nicholas II
was overthrown, a provisional government was put into place as an attempt at starting a republic. However, in October of 1917, yet another revolution
overthrew this provisional government. The communist Bolshevik party took control and Russia became a dictatorship. How did this want for
democracy ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Democracy was generally thought of as "the people's power"; "the people" could refer to either the whole population or just the working and lower
class people. This broad definition left plenty of room for interpretation, which allowed for the two definitions of "the people" seen above. The first
definition, which defines the people as the entire population, seems closer to the modern definition of democracy. However, the second definition
seemed to fit with what much of the Russian population thought after the revolution. It was less about giving power to the people and more about
taking power away from the ruling and upper class. This second definition is the one that the Bolsheviks managed to fit themselves under. Tsereteli, a
Russian memoirist, claimed, "'Lenin's furious ideology is only a concentrated and perhaps exaggerated expression of those thoughts and feelings that
partially ferment in the heads of a significant portion of democracy,'". Tsereteli described the ideas supported and voiced by the leader of the
Bolshevik party, the party that would soon take over and turn Russia into a dictatorship, as simply amplified parts of democracy. As the 1917 Russian
definition of democracy was more anti–bourgeois than it was actually about power for the people as it claimed to be, then even the communists could
be considered

Tsar Nicholas II: The Failure Of The Romanov Regime
In Tsar Nicholas II's early rule, his main objective was to uphold the European status quo. In the 1890s they began to expand their industries and the
following year the Trans–Siberian railways were under construction. The strength of the Romanov rule was the church, army, political parties, and the
secret police. Although they supported Tsar Nicholas II, soldiers joined riots against him and church's supported him, but did not approve of his ways.
The weakness of Tsar Nicholas II outweighs his strengths, being his incompetence of problems, economic and social, in Russia at the time. Opposition
to the Tsar because of his failure to address problems kept increasing and inevitably led to him being overthrown.
The Tsar and Tsarina's only son,

World War One's Influences on the Abdication of Tsar...
What was the significance in WW1 in bringing about the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II in March 1917?
The Romanov dynasty began in 1613, however 1917 saw an abrupt end to the Romanov's with the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II. Demonstrations and
strikes gripped the Russian people and with anti–governmental soldiers taking control, the Tsar had no alternative but to abdicate. Historians such as
Michael Lynch1 and John Daborn2 state that in Russia's great need of strength and power came a Tsar of weakness and limited outlook. However
historians such as Ray Pearson believe that in aggressive opposition groups and with the help of the working class aimed to bring down the Tsardom at
all costs.
The argument that the First World War led to the downfall of the Tsardom in Russia is supported by how unprepared the military were from the
outset and throughout the war. Poor conditions and lack of weaponry led to low morale. Production of weapons was seriously flawed as seen in the
Russian front at Gorlice, where "many soldiers had no rifles and had to wait for a comrade to be killed before taking his weapon"3. "By the end of
December 1914, 6,554,000 men had been mobilized with only 4,652,000 rifles available to them"4. Furthermore the appalling conditions that were
reported in the Russian trenches caused outbreaks of diseases such as typhoid and cholera creating tensions amongst Russia's "indestructible army"5.
The dreadful conditions caused soldiers to turn against their

Tsar Nicholas II And The Great Russian Empire Into A...
Tsar Nicholas II and and Joseph Stalin were vicious rulers who both transformed the once great Russian Empire into a series of fragmented states.
Nikolay Aleksandrovich was born May 18, 1868 to Aleksandr Aleksandrovich (Tsar Alexander III from 1881
–1894). He was born to a noble family, his
father being Tsar ofRussia and his cousin being King George V of England. On March 1 1881, his grandfather was assassinated, making Nicholas
the Tsesarevich, or son of the Tsar. Many said that Nicholas's father never prepared him well enough for his role as Tsar. In 1894 Alexander III fell ill
with nephritis and passed away on November 1st. Although young and inexperienced, Nicholas took the throne and the title of Tsar Nicholas II. At the
time of his ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On July 17, 1918, while imprisoned in Yekaterinburg by the Bolshevik revolutionaries, the Tsar and his family were told that counterrevolutionaries
were approaching the town and that the house may be fired on so they would have to move for their protection. They were then taken down to the
basement and shot and killed by their captors. His wife and all his children included. The Tsardom was dissolved and a provincial government was
established, lead by Georgy Lvov. This government was quickly overthrown by Vladimir Lenin and the Bolshevik party.
Joseph Stalin, born December 1878, was one of the seven members of the first Politburo, which was created in 1917 to manage the Bolshevik
revolution. They overthrew the new Russian provisional government and he was appointed the General Secretary of the Bolshevik Party's central
committee in 1922. After many years of suffering, Vladimir Lenin passed away on January 21st, 1924. After Lenin's death, there was a massive
power struggle, which resulted in the majority of the Politburo either exiled or executed by Stalin. At the end of his rule, nearly 55 percent of the
population considered it an end of terror. However, support for Stalin has actually increased since the end of the

How far did World War One contribute to the fall of Tsar Nicholas in 1917?
Tsar Nicholas II was the last Tsar of Russia, ruling from November 1 1894, to his forced abdication in 1917. There are many factors contributing to
his downfall, with World War One being one of the greatest. The Russian army was not well prepared enough for war; the Tsar took the role of
commander in chief despite being incapable, and during war: Russian cities suffered from a shortage of food.
Tsar Nicholas II took over as commander in chief during World War I, replacing Grand Duke Nicholas after the great retreat of the Russian army. This
was a huge mistake on his part as it meant that all blame for anything that went wrong was directly placed on him. He was already ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
This was because they had no materials for shelter, a shortage of food and medical services, and they were in bad fighting conditions. Of the
6,553,000 men in the army in December1914, only 4,652,000 had rifles. Untrained troops had to enter the battle without sufficient arms or
ammunition. Furthermore, it was reported that 100,000 new rifles were needed each month but Russian factories could not even produce half of this.
Wounded soldiers often had to go five days before they were attended to, as neither wagons, horses, first aid, nor any other organisations were
allowed to go the forward areas. Freight trains came to Moscow with the wounded often without clothing, badly hurt and unfed, yet nurses were not
allowed to help. Almost 15 million soldiers served in the Russian army during the First World War, with an estimated 1.8 million killed, 2.8 million
wounded and 2.4 million taken as prisoners. Morale of the army declined noticeably, due to these shortages, bad transport systems and bad news at the
front. Hence, he no longer had the support of the army – one of his main supporters, and this helped lead to the collapse of the Tsar because he was not
prepared for

Tsar Nicholas 's The Great War
Introduction Tsar Nicholas II's reign was turbulent, seeing wars, revolutions, and a general sense of displeasure from the people and the
government. Intellectuals were no longer content with living under an autocracy and believed that the Russian government was archaic and
inefficient. Peasants spoke out against their poor living and working conditions. By 1917, Nicholas' reign was over and the Romanov family was
no longer in power. One of the leading causes of the Romanov downfall was Nicholas himself. Although the situation in which he inherited the
throne were not ideal, his character and method of dealing with state affairs did not help. His personality affected his leadership style, making his
leadership style an unpopular one. Even his most trusted advisors and friends came second to Nicholas' desire to uphold autocracy in Russia. The
influence of Pyotr Stolypin and Sergei Witte, two of Nicholas' senior officials, faded as Nicholas thought they hindered his supreme autocracy.
Nicholas' character was also evident in the Great War. His many stubborn decisions, despite being constantly advised against them, caused Russia
much grief during and after the war. Nicholas' wife Alexandra influenced many of these decisions and other decisions on state affairs. Nicholas'
personality allowed Alexandra to have a large impact on his reign. This further gave Grigori Rasputin a large political presence in Russia as well.
Nicholas 's personality was one of the factors that

Explain Why Did Tsar Nicholas II Face Problems From 1906...
Why did Tsar Nicholas II continue to face problems from 1906 to 1914?
After the 1905 Revolution, the Tsar got a little taste of what was to come if he did not change the way the country functioned. However too little was
done too late and after war was declared and Stolypin's assassination it was almost certain that there would be no more tsarist regime.
Nicholas II promised in the October Manifesto that a duma may be set up, so he can get some liberal support. This was the first time the Tsar has
tried at a democratic government. However what displeased the people is what the Tsar had done in April 1906. He passed on the Fundamental Laws
which basically allowed him to overrule any decision of the Duma and that he would keep most of his autocratic power. It seemed that nothing has
changed after the 1905 Revolution. The first ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many historians believe that if there was no World War I, Stolypin would be able to saveRussia by resolving the peasant's discontent. As the peasants
had no land of their own and the Mir was creating major problems, the peasants were quite angry. Also they made up most of the population, which
showed that they must be taken seriously or they could do major damage to the country. Stolypin gave the peasants the power to choose to leave
the Mirs and join Kulaks freely. Because of this there were some successes; record harvests in 1913 and production was increasing however it
depended on the region. The problem was that Stolypin was assassinated and nobody was there to continue his reforms. However there were many
peasants that were left without anything and they were forced to go to towns and look for work. This new class of peasants were dangerous as they
were easy targets for radicalism. Also most of the land still was owned by the high class and not a lot has changed. The peasants in Russia were not
pleased as

Tsar Nicholas II Under The October Manifesto

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Renee Delgado

More from Renee Delgado (18)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Tsar Nicholas II Under The October Manifesto