Renewable Energy Technologies and
Distributed Generation
Anirudh Paduru, Transmission Deployment Engineer
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Access to Electricity
• Electricity is a major
contributor in meeting
global goals for
economic development,
poverty alleviation, and
social development
• Over a billion people
have little or no access
to electricity
Source: www.abb.com
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Disparity in Consumption
Richest billion people consume over 50%
of all energy, while the poorest billion
consume around 4%.
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Disparity in Consumption
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Resources used to Generate Electricity in
United States
Source: EIA (May 29, 2012)
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Average Electricity Price in the U.S.
Innovation for Our Energy Future
 Declining Fossil Fuel Supplies
 Increasing Cost of Fossil Fuels
 Political Concerns
 Environmental Concerns
Reasons for Developing Renewable
Energy Resources
Innovation for Our Energy Future
 Biomass
 Geothermal
 Hydro
 Solar (PV and Solar Thermal)
 Wind
Renewable Energy Technologies
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Wind Energy
 Wind energy is a mature, yet
evolving technology
 Wind energy comes in many sizes
 Wind energy is cost competitive
today in many locations throughout
the United States
 Large wind development has clear
impacts to neighboring communities
that are both positive and negative
and therefore requires active
stakeholder engagement
Source: NREL/PIX 05572
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Wind Energy Project Types
Primary Markets:
• Remote power
― Remote communities
― Remote uses
(telecommunications,
pumping)
• On-site energy production and
consumption
― Residential, commercial,
industrial
• Energy for sale
― Merchant power
― Purchased power
― Utility projects
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Best Uses for Technology (size, installed cost)
On-Site Power
• Remote (<10 kilowatt [kW], $6-$12/watt [W])
• Water pumping, electrification
• Water pump = 1 kW, House = 5 kW, Farm = 10 kW
Grid Connected ($7- $3.50/W)
• Small (1 kW – 50 kW)
• Residence, business, farm/ranch
• Mid-Size (100 kW – 1 megawatt [MW])
• Facility, community, industrial
• Convenience store = 50 kW, school = 250 kW
Energy for Sale ($2-$3/W)
• Utility (>1MW)
• Wind farm
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Wind Resource Maps
Wind Powering America:
http://www.windpoweringamerica.gov/windmaps/
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Potential Installed Wind on Tribal Lands
Innovation for Our Energy Future
 Solar technologies work in all parts of the United States,
economics of solar are dependent on first cost (including
incentives), solar resource, and cost of energy being displaced
 Simple Direct Drive PV System : Direct conversion of sunlight
into direct current (DC) electricity
 Alternating Current PV System with Inverter : DC converted
to alternating current (AC) by inverter
Solar Energy
Illustration by Jim Leyshon, NREL
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Photovoltaic
Concentrated
Solar Power Solar Heating Solar Lighting
PV systems use
semiconductors to
convert sunlight
directly to energy.
CSP systems focus
the sun’s heat onto
a generator to
produce electricity.
Solar collectors absorb
the sun’s energy to
provide low temperature
space or water heating.
Passage for natural
interior lighting or
piping light indoors
using fiber optics.
Energy Conversion
Light  Electricity Heat  Electricity Heat  Heat Light  Light
Conversion Type
Direct Indirect Direct None
Solar Energy Technologies
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Abundant Solar Resource
Innovation for Our Energy Future
PV Resource in Southwest Tribal Lands
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Types of Concentrated Solar Power (CSP)
Heliostat
CSP with
central
receiver
Parabolic
Troughs
CSP
NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY
U.S. PV Trends 2012-2013
• U.S. PV Capacity 7.7 GW by end of 2012
• U.S. expected to add 4.4 GW PV in 2013, with
expected PV at 12.1 GW!
• 82,000 U.S. homes have PV as of 1/1/13
• Costs for PV dropped 27% in 2012
• US Department of Energy SunShot Goals of $1
(US) per Watt installed PV (utility-scale)
• PV costs are moving toward “Grid Parity”
NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY
Price of PV Modules
Innovation for Our Energy Future
 Distributed generation (DG) refers to power
generation at the point of consumption.
 Distributed generation using renewable resources like
the sun and wind
 Most renewable energy will be converted into
electricity. The resource will be geographically
highly distributed, and mostly dependent on changing
weather and climate.
Distributed Generation
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Distributed Generation
 Cannot be directly controlled like conventional
generation.
 Significantly increasing the penetration levels from
renewable energy sources requires a revision of the
way power systems are designed and operated in
order to better accommodate these sources.
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Renewable Energy Resources Interconnection
PV, small
wind, and fuel cells
interconnect at the
distribution level
Large
wind farms, CSP,
large PV, biopower,
hydro, geothermal,
hydrokinetic,
interconnect at
transmission and
sub-transmission
levels
Central Station
Distributed
Electric Power System
Innovation for Our Energy Future
DG System Integration
Advanced
Technology
Rules, Policy,
Procedures and
Agreements
and Standards
Technical Codes
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Typical Utility Process
26
Preferred Interconnection Flow
• Significant difference between utility practices, process, tools,
models, mitigation
• Report completed, regional report in-progress for publication
(remove specific utility names)
Application
Process
Screens
Employed
Supplemental
Review
Impact
Study
Model Mitigate
Approval
Typical Interconnection Process
Expedited Review
Process (BEST)
$ Supplemental study
Process (Good)
$$$ Detailed Study Process (Expensive, Time-Consuming)
Fail Fail
NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY
Regulatory & Technical Focus on PV in US?
Vast majority of DG interconnections are solar PV
– Inverter-based (low short circuit current, built-in anti-islanding, etc.)
– Diurnal cycle, variable output
Potential problems
– Steady-state voltage control and LTC/VR tap operations
– Power quality, e.g., customer flicker
– Risk of unintentional islanding (PQ, TOV, safety?)
– Protection (e.g., coordination, relay desensitization, etc.)
Increasing PV penetration means that more PV
systems are failing screens than in the past
– Recent experience with high penetration PV indicates existing
screen may be overly conservative for PV
NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY
DG Stakeholders
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Interconnection Rules in U.S.
43 States & FERC have interconnection rules
29 States have Renewable Portfolio
Standards
43 States have Net Energy Metering
provisions
Most distributed generation systems are small
wind and solar PV
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Best Practices for Interconnection:
 Online applications, guidelines
 Options to path of impact study
 Low-cost/no-cost application
 Uniform state rules for utilities (e.g. Rule 21)
 Standard approach to evaluating apps
 Reasonable screens
 Supplemental screening options
 Standardized distribution modeling platform
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Best Practices continued:
 Good communication
 Online tracking system
 Standard impact studies (when needed)
 Cost-effective mitigation strategies
 A “Partner” attitude between utilities and
developers
 Supportive regulatory organizations
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Keys to Successful Projects
From both the Tribal and Utility Perspectives
Quantified renewable resource
Defined permitting path and timeline
Credible developer
Documentation of the past performance of
the technology
Solid business plan.
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Quantified Renewable Resource
Preliminary
Screening
Screening
Feasibility
Study
Sizing and
Design
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Permitting Path and Timeline
 Cultural Resource Clearances
 Tribal, local, state and federal permitting support
 Human health and environmental effects
assessments
 Biological assessments and ecological impact
analyses
 Threatened and endangered species clearances
 Noise and visual impact analyses
 Tribal Leadership approval
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Credible Developer
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Performance of Technology
Equipment
requirements
and lead times
O&M
requirements
Reliability
Equipment
life
Project life
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Business Plan
 Nature of the Business
 Market Analysis
 Management Team (discussed earlier)
 Technology Considerations (discussed earlier)
 Project Financing
 Production and Operation Analysis
 Tribal Community Presence
Innovation for Our Energy Future
A Nexus of Opportunity
 Tribal Land is 2% of
total land in the US
 Tribal Land Contains
5% of the total US
potential
 Abundant Land
available for
development
 HEARTH Act provides
enhances sovereignty
 Reduced emphasis on
centralized power plants
 Increased interest in
renewable energy
projects and distributed
generation
 Decreased cost in
renewable energy
technologies
Tribal Position Utility Position
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Thank You

TribeUtilPartners_paduru.pptx

  • 1.
    Renewable Energy Technologiesand Distributed Generation Anirudh Paduru, Transmission Deployment Engineer
  • 2.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Access to Electricity • Electricity is a major contributor in meeting global goals for economic development, poverty alleviation, and social development • Over a billion people have little or no access to electricity Source: www.abb.com
  • 3.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Disparity in Consumption Richest billion people consume over 50% of all energy, while the poorest billion consume around 4%.
  • 4.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Disparity in Consumption
  • 5.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Resources used to Generate Electricity in United States Source: EIA (May 29, 2012)
  • 6.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Average Electricity Price in the U.S.
  • 7.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future  Declining Fossil Fuel Supplies  Increasing Cost of Fossil Fuels  Political Concerns  Environmental Concerns Reasons for Developing Renewable Energy Resources
  • 8.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future  Biomass  Geothermal  Hydro  Solar (PV and Solar Thermal)  Wind Renewable Energy Technologies
  • 9.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Wind Energy  Wind energy is a mature, yet evolving technology  Wind energy comes in many sizes  Wind energy is cost competitive today in many locations throughout the United States  Large wind development has clear impacts to neighboring communities that are both positive and negative and therefore requires active stakeholder engagement Source: NREL/PIX 05572
  • 10.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Wind Energy Project Types Primary Markets: • Remote power ― Remote communities ― Remote uses (telecommunications, pumping) • On-site energy production and consumption ― Residential, commercial, industrial • Energy for sale ― Merchant power ― Purchased power ― Utility projects
  • 11.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Best Uses for Technology (size, installed cost) On-Site Power • Remote (<10 kilowatt [kW], $6-$12/watt [W]) • Water pumping, electrification • Water pump = 1 kW, House = 5 kW, Farm = 10 kW Grid Connected ($7- $3.50/W) • Small (1 kW – 50 kW) • Residence, business, farm/ranch • Mid-Size (100 kW – 1 megawatt [MW]) • Facility, community, industrial • Convenience store = 50 kW, school = 250 kW Energy for Sale ($2-$3/W) • Utility (>1MW) • Wind farm
  • 12.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Wind Resource Maps Wind Powering America: http://www.windpoweringamerica.gov/windmaps/
  • 13.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Potential Installed Wind on Tribal Lands
  • 14.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future  Solar technologies work in all parts of the United States, economics of solar are dependent on first cost (including incentives), solar resource, and cost of energy being displaced  Simple Direct Drive PV System : Direct conversion of sunlight into direct current (DC) electricity  Alternating Current PV System with Inverter : DC converted to alternating current (AC) by inverter Solar Energy Illustration by Jim Leyshon, NREL
  • 15.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Photovoltaic Concentrated Solar Power Solar Heating Solar Lighting PV systems use semiconductors to convert sunlight directly to energy. CSP systems focus the sun’s heat onto a generator to produce electricity. Solar collectors absorb the sun’s energy to provide low temperature space or water heating. Passage for natural interior lighting or piping light indoors using fiber optics. Energy Conversion Light  Electricity Heat  Electricity Heat  Heat Light  Light Conversion Type Direct Indirect Direct None Solar Energy Technologies
  • 16.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Abundant Solar Resource
  • 17.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future PV Resource in Southwest Tribal Lands
  • 18.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Types of Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) Heliostat CSP with central receiver Parabolic Troughs CSP
  • 19.
    NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGYLABORATORY U.S. PV Trends 2012-2013 • U.S. PV Capacity 7.7 GW by end of 2012 • U.S. expected to add 4.4 GW PV in 2013, with expected PV at 12.1 GW! • 82,000 U.S. homes have PV as of 1/1/13 • Costs for PV dropped 27% in 2012 • US Department of Energy SunShot Goals of $1 (US) per Watt installed PV (utility-scale) • PV costs are moving toward “Grid Parity”
  • 20.
    NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGYLABORATORY Price of PV Modules
  • 21.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future  Distributed generation (DG) refers to power generation at the point of consumption.  Distributed generation using renewable resources like the sun and wind  Most renewable energy will be converted into electricity. The resource will be geographically highly distributed, and mostly dependent on changing weather and climate. Distributed Generation
  • 22.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Distributed Generation  Cannot be directly controlled like conventional generation.  Significantly increasing the penetration levels from renewable energy sources requires a revision of the way power systems are designed and operated in order to better accommodate these sources.
  • 23.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Renewable Energy Resources Interconnection PV, small wind, and fuel cells interconnect at the distribution level Large wind farms, CSP, large PV, biopower, hydro, geothermal, hydrokinetic, interconnect at transmission and sub-transmission levels Central Station Distributed Electric Power System
  • 24.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future DG System Integration Advanced Technology Rules, Policy, Procedures and Agreements and Standards Technical Codes
  • 25.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Typical Utility Process
  • 26.
    26 Preferred Interconnection Flow •Significant difference between utility practices, process, tools, models, mitigation • Report completed, regional report in-progress for publication (remove specific utility names) Application Process Screens Employed Supplemental Review Impact Study Model Mitigate Approval Typical Interconnection Process Expedited Review Process (BEST) $ Supplemental study Process (Good) $$$ Detailed Study Process (Expensive, Time-Consuming) Fail Fail
  • 27.
    NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGYLABORATORY Regulatory & Technical Focus on PV in US? Vast majority of DG interconnections are solar PV – Inverter-based (low short circuit current, built-in anti-islanding, etc.) – Diurnal cycle, variable output Potential problems – Steady-state voltage control and LTC/VR tap operations – Power quality, e.g., customer flicker – Risk of unintentional islanding (PQ, TOV, safety?) – Protection (e.g., coordination, relay desensitization, etc.) Increasing PV penetration means that more PV systems are failing screens than in the past – Recent experience with high penetration PV indicates existing screen may be overly conservative for PV
  • 28.
    NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGYLABORATORY DG Stakeholders
  • 29.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Interconnection Rules in U.S. 43 States & FERC have interconnection rules 29 States have Renewable Portfolio Standards 43 States have Net Energy Metering provisions Most distributed generation systems are small wind and solar PV
  • 30.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Best Practices for Interconnection:  Online applications, guidelines  Options to path of impact study  Low-cost/no-cost application  Uniform state rules for utilities (e.g. Rule 21)  Standard approach to evaluating apps  Reasonable screens  Supplemental screening options  Standardized distribution modeling platform
  • 31.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Best Practices continued:  Good communication  Online tracking system  Standard impact studies (when needed)  Cost-effective mitigation strategies  A “Partner” attitude between utilities and developers  Supportive regulatory organizations
  • 32.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Keys to Successful Projects From both the Tribal and Utility Perspectives Quantified renewable resource Defined permitting path and timeline Credible developer Documentation of the past performance of the technology Solid business plan.
  • 33.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Quantified Renewable Resource Preliminary Screening Screening Feasibility Study Sizing and Design
  • 34.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Permitting Path and Timeline  Cultural Resource Clearances  Tribal, local, state and federal permitting support  Human health and environmental effects assessments  Biological assessments and ecological impact analyses  Threatened and endangered species clearances  Noise and visual impact analyses  Tribal Leadership approval
  • 35.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Credible Developer
  • 36.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Performance of Technology Equipment requirements and lead times O&M requirements Reliability Equipment life Project life
  • 37.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Business Plan  Nature of the Business  Market Analysis  Management Team (discussed earlier)  Technology Considerations (discussed earlier)  Project Financing  Production and Operation Analysis  Tribal Community Presence
  • 38.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future A Nexus of Opportunity  Tribal Land is 2% of total land in the US  Tribal Land Contains 5% of the total US potential  Abundant Land available for development  HEARTH Act provides enhances sovereignty  Reduced emphasis on centralized power plants  Increased interest in renewable energy projects and distributed generation  Decreased cost in renewable energy technologies Tribal Position Utility Position
  • 39.
    Innovation for OurEnergy Future Thank You