The document outlines the agenda and logistics for a meeting of the Mental Health Transformation Project's Transformation Work Group, held on June 16, 2006, aimed at adopting strategies for implementing identified mental health outcomes. Key presentations include employment and housing goals, resource inventory, and strategies from various task groups addressing evidence-based practices, fiscal principles, IT strategies, cultural competence, and evaluation recommendations. The meeting concludes with plans for drafting and finalizing the Comprehensive Mental Health Plan (CMHP) for submission to the governor by September 30, 2006.

1. Mental Health Transformation Project June 16, 2006 Transformation Work Group

2. Introduction and Logistics Welcome Logistics The purpose of today’s meeting is to consider and adopt the strategies for implementing the identified outcomes

3. Today’s Agenda 10:00 – 10:15 Welcome and Next steps 10:15 – 10:30 Employment and Housing Goals for CMHP 10:30 – 11:30 Resource Inventory / Needs Assessment 11:30 – 12:00 Lunch 12:00 – 3:45 Presentation & Adoption of Strategies 3:45 – 4:00 Next steps

4. OVERVIEW BACKGROUND

5. MHTP Overview SUBCOMMITTEES Hold public input meetings Develop priority outcomes TASK GROUPS identify strategies , initiatives , and alternatives to reach outcomes DRAFT CMHP 7 / 15 Final Comprehensive Mental Health State Plan 09 - 30 - 2006 Transformation Process : Year One of Implementation TWG prioritizes outcomes and strategies Final Review by Governor’s Office Resource Inventory 5 - 15 - 2006 Needs Assessment 5 - 15 - 2006 ` OUTCOMES STRATEGIES You Are Here

6. Schedule Overview Schedule Overview Jan Feb March April May June Aug July Sept Public Input 21 Subcommittee sessions 20 Listening sessions Surveys distributed statewide TWG Reviews/ Approves Outcomes Subcommittees Prioritizes Outcomes Task groups prepare strategies TWG Reviews/ Prioritizes strategies Sterling prepares draft CMHP RDA conducts needs assessment and Resource Inventory CMHP DRAFT TWG reviews draft CMHP Submit CMHP to Governor Deliver CMHP to SAMHSA Task groups share strategies with subcommittees and modify if needed Jan Feb March April May June Aug July Sept Jan Feb March April May June Aug July Sept Public Input 21 Subcommittee sessions 24 Listening sessions Surveys distributed statewide TWG Reviews/ Approves Outcomes Subcommittees Prioritizes Outcomes Task groups prepare strategies TWG Reviews/ Prioritizes strategies Sterling prepares draft CMHP RDA conducts needs assessment and Resource Inventory CMHP DRAFT CMHP DRAFT TWG reviews draft CMHP Submit CMHP to Governor Deliver CMHP to SAMHSA Task groups share strategies with subcommittees and modify if needed

7. Employment and Housing Goals Presentation Lynn Davison & Lynnae Ruttledge

8. Resource Inventory / Needs Assessment Presentation Dennis McBride Judy Hall Eric Bruns Liz Kohlenberg

9. Each Task Group will be presenting their work to the TWG. The TWG will be asked to decide whether the task groups’ proposals are accepted for inclusion into the CMHP Discussion should focus on whether the TWG agrees with the strategies and/or the principles. Key questions include: Are these the “right” strategies and/or principles? Is this an appropriate framework? Are there any specific strategies that we cannot live with? Are there others that may be needed? Presentation of Strategies

10. Each of the task groups developed a set of overarching, or broad-based principles as a framework for developing their specific strategies. These will be highlighted by each of the task groups and if approved will guide their work in subsequent years Other strategies are specifically geared towards one or more of the outcomes approved at the April 21st TWG meeting Each of the Task Groups believes that their work has just begun The timelines for developing the first cut were very aggressive. In some cases, there was not enough known to form detailed strategies. Presentation of Strategies

11. Task Group Presentations

12. Evidence-, Consensus-Based/ Promising and Emerging Practices Task Group Chair: Mark Snowden, MD, MPH Associate Professor UW Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

13. Decision Point Does the TWG accept the scope of the Task Group’s strategies as set forth in their definitions of evidence-based, promising, and emerging practices, and system strategies? Does the TWG accept the strategies as proposed by the ECBPEP Task Group? Are there any strategies that the TWG cannot accept? Are there other strategies that should be included? Evidence- Consensus-Based, Promising, Emerging Practices

14. Fiscal Task Group Chair: Rick Weaver, MA President/CEO Central Washington Comprehensive Mental Health

15. Decision Point Does the TWG accept the approach proposed by the Fiscal Task Group to defer detailed strategies and instead define principles to help determine detailed strategies in Year 2 when more information is known? Are these the right principles? Fiscal Task Group

16. IT Task Group Co-Chairs: Katie Weaver Randall, MA Research Associate, Mental Health Division Washington Institute for Mental Illness and Research Liz Kohlenberg, PhD Director, DSHS Research and Data Analysis Division

17. Decision Point Does the TWG agree that the state should adopt strategies that will support linked and/or integrated data across systems? Does the TWG agree that the state should further explore ways to make data from multiple providers about encounters with individual consumers, available to those consumers and their multiple providers and case managers, "on the ground" in "real time"? IT Task Group

18. Decision Point Does the TWG agree that the state should further explore the feasibility of a Global Consumer Information Center consumer level record for both public and privately funded mental health services? Does the TWG agree that the state should further explore the other strategies as proposed by the IT Task Group? Are there any strategies proposed that the TWG would prefer we not pursue at this time? Are there other IT strategies that should be explored? Does the TWG want a more detailed IT implementation proposal -- with resource estimates and an implementation timeline? When do they need that? IT Task Group

19. Cultural Competence Task Group Chair: Emilio Vela, Jr. Treatment and Prevention Policy Analyst Division of Alcohol and Substance Abuse

20. Cultural Competence Decision Point Does the TWG accept the proposed overarching strategy to establish an Interdepartmental Coordinating Council on Cultural Competence? Does the TWG accept the supporting strategies as proposed by the Cultural Competence Task Group? Are there any strategies that the TWG cannot accept? Are there other strategies that should be included?

21. Evaluation Task Group Chair: Judy Hall, Ph.D Research Director Mental Health Division, HRSA

22. Evaluation Decision Point Does the TWG accept the Evaluation Recommendations proposed by the Evaluation Task Group? Are there any of these recommendations that the TWG cannot accept? Are there other recommendations that should be included?

23. Social Marketing Social Marketing Chair: Heidi Keller Department of Health

24. Social Marketing Decision Point Does the TWG accept the research and design approach proposed by the Social Marketing Task Group? Are there any other target behaviors that the TWG believes should be incorporated? Are there other change agents who should be included?

25. Wrap Up Questions?

26. Wrap Up Sterling Associates will work with the Project Team to prepare the Comprehensive Mental Health Plan (CMHP) The draft plan will be posted for public viewing August 1 : TWG members will receive the draft CMHP for review August 4: TWG will meet to make final modifications and approve the CMHP Once approved, the CMHP will be submitted to the Governor’s office for review September 30: CMHP due to SAMHSA

27. Wrap Up Final comments or questions Please complete and return the evaluation Thank you!