Training Session 4: Global Study on Gender Norms and Capacities to Innovate in Agriculture
Jessica Raneri
Adapting the Gender Norms Case Study for Nutrition
Day 1 - Harris - Gender and Ag-Nutrition Pathways and Indicators
Training Session 4 – Raneri – Adapting the Gender Norms Case Study for Nutrition
1. Adapting the Gender Norms Case Study
for Nutrition
J.Raneri, M.Elias and G.Kennedy
2. Objectives
• Current project: Systems approach to
improved dietary quality and nutrition:
What locally available species could fill nutrient gaps
and how can these be integrated into existing farming
systems?
• Gender disaggregated data collected in
baseline (HH surveys and FGDs)
• Conduct Case Studies to have in-depth
understanding of gender norms in the
study site area
• Contribute to Global Study
Adapt existing methodology to have a nutrition
lens – to help guide nutrition intervention
design
Bioversity InternationalJ.Raneri
3. Process
• Review existing methodology guides and sources relevant to
the gender and nutrition nexus
• Identify gaps in current methodology and propose list of
additional information to be collected
• Existing questions adapted to have a nutrition lens
• New questions on nutrition added, unpacked from a gender
perspective
• Review and prioritize proposed questions by Gender and
Nutrition Specialists (together)
• Final questions incorporated to fit into style and flow of existing
Gender Case Study methodology by Gender Specialist who
will lead the work and is trained in the Case Study
4. Outputs
• Revised methodology guide with prioritized questions included
(FGD and KI)
• Approach has been cleared by Patti (Global Study PI)
• More detailed list of questions for a broader nutrition/
gender understanding depending on the research needs
• Key Topics included:
• Serving practices and priority access to nutrient dense foods
• Community trends on food security and malnutrition
• More detail on types of decision making and responsibility regarding food provision
• Child care and breastfeeding
• Time burden
• Nutrition and health organisations (formal and informal)
5. J. Raneri
Moving Forward
• Pilot the adapted methodology in two villages in NW Vietnam
• Review adapted methodology based on feedback from FGD
participants & researchers
• Structure and flow of sessions (FGD & KI)
• Refining Nutrition related questions as needed
• Results will be shared and discussed with communities
COVER SLIDE
To change the picture:
Right click on the photo
Click on change picture
If you need a specific CRP logo, replace the general CGIAR logo at the upper right.
TEXT + PICTURE ON THE RIGHT
To change the photo
-Right click on the photo
- Click on change
We added most of the questions in the community profile and in the FGD with the poor adults since they are our target beneficiaries (whose eating patterns we want to know how to influence). Different parts of the community profile will be conducted with different KIs, thereby making sure that we do not hold up anyone for too long while also addressing additional nutrition-focused questions. The FGD with the adults from the 'poor' socio-economic group (Ladder of Life FGD) is going to be divided into two; we will do Module 1 (Gender Norms, Labour Market Trends and Innovation Practices) with one group and do Module 2 (Ladder of Life) with another group that has the same demographics (so a total of 4 groups--2 women's and 2 men's--instead of 2). This means that each FGD should actually be shorter, even with the additional questions, than in the original methodology design. Our approach has been cleared by Patti, the Global Study PI.