Tr.4 broker network text_nov 2021_dy
•
0 likes•152 views
The second set of rounds allows all users to communicate via a chat window. User 1 can chat with the provider, while Users 2 and 3 can only chat with each other. Users can discuss any aspect of the exercise in the chat, except promising side payments or revealing identities, as chat does not affect earnings.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Tr.4 broker network text_nov 2021
The second set of rounds allows all users to communicate via a chatroom, except user 1 can only chat with the provider. Users can discuss the exercise but cannot promise side payments or reveal identities, as chat does not impact earnings. Users will play another set of rounds with added text-based communication between most players.
Tr.3 complete network text_jan 2021_final
The second set of rounds allows all players to communicate via a chat window at the beginning of each round to discuss any aspect of the exercise. Players can send text messages but are not allowed to promise side payments, threaten others, or reveal identities. The chat does not affect players' earnings.
Tr.1 bonding network text_jan 2021_final
Users can now communicate with each other via chat at the start of each round to discuss the exercise, but the Provider cannot participate in chats. Users are restricted to not promising side payments or revealing identities. The chat does not affect earnings for Users or Providers.
Tr.2 linking network text_jan 2021_final
The second set of rounds allows for text-based communication in a chatroom between users and the provider at the beginning of each round, with restrictions. Users can communicate with the provider and vice versa, but not with other users. Participants are not allowed to promise side payments, reveal identities, or discuss anything that affects earnings.
DEV-Instuction2-BL
The second set of rounds allows all players, including Users and the Provider, to communicate via text chat before each round. Players can discuss any aspect of the exercise but may not reveal identities or promise side payments. A new feature is that the Provider and Users can now message each other directly through the chat window to coordinate strategies before making decisions each round.
Badminton managers meeting online
The document summarizes the rules for an intramural badminton tournament at Northeastern University. It states that each match consists of three games to 15 points, with teams switching sides after the first two games and when the leading score reaches 8 in the third game. It provides details on serving regulations, faults, lets, and announces a quiz for managers to test their understanding of the rules.
Water-Instruction2-3
The second set of rounds allows (1) group chat between users and the provider at the start of each round to discuss any aspect of the exercise, and (2) players can observe each other's decisions and earnings after making their own decision. The group chat does not affect earnings and players are prohibited from promising side payments, threats, or revealing identities during chat.
Water-Instruction2-2
The second set of rounds allows (1) group chat between users and the provider at the start of each round to discuss the exercise, and (2) users and the provider to observe each other's decisions and earnings. Specifically, each user can communicate with the provider, who can also communicate with all users, though users cannot communicate with each other directly. Additionally, users and the provider can now see each other's choices and rewards within a round, but users still cannot see other users' results. The group chat does not impact earnings, and revealing identities or making threats is prohibited.
Recommended
Tr.4 broker network text_nov 2021
The second set of rounds allows all users to communicate via a chatroom, except user 1 can only chat with the provider. Users can discuss the exercise but cannot promise side payments or reveal identities, as chat does not impact earnings. Users will play another set of rounds with added text-based communication between most players.
Tr.3 complete network text_jan 2021_final
The second set of rounds allows all players to communicate via a chat window at the beginning of each round to discuss any aspect of the exercise. Players can send text messages but are not allowed to promise side payments, threaten others, or reveal identities. The chat does not affect players' earnings.
Tr.1 bonding network text_jan 2021_final
Users can now communicate with each other via chat at the start of each round to discuss the exercise, but the Provider cannot participate in chats. Users are restricted to not promising side payments or revealing identities. The chat does not affect earnings for Users or Providers.
Tr.2 linking network text_jan 2021_final
The second set of rounds allows for text-based communication in a chatroom between users and the provider at the beginning of each round, with restrictions. Users can communicate with the provider and vice versa, but not with other users. Participants are not allowed to promise side payments, reveal identities, or discuss anything that affects earnings.
DEV-Instuction2-BL
The second set of rounds allows all players, including Users and the Provider, to communicate via text chat before each round. Players can discuss any aspect of the exercise but may not reveal identities or promise side payments. A new feature is that the Provider and Users can now message each other directly through the chat window to coordinate strategies before making decisions each round.
Badminton managers meeting online
The document summarizes the rules for an intramural badminton tournament at Northeastern University. It states that each match consists of three games to 15 points, with teams switching sides after the first two games and when the leading score reaches 8 in the third game. It provides details on serving regulations, faults, lets, and announces a quiz for managers to test their understanding of the rules.
Water-Instruction2-3
The second set of rounds allows (1) group chat between users and the provider at the start of each round to discuss any aspect of the exercise, and (2) players can observe each other's decisions and earnings after making their own decision. The group chat does not affect earnings and players are prohibited from promising side payments, threats, or revealing identities during chat.
Water-Instruction2-2
The second set of rounds allows (1) group chat between users and the provider at the start of each round to discuss the exercise, and (2) users and the provider to observe each other's decisions and earnings. Specifically, each user can communicate with the provider, who can also communicate with all users, though users cannot communicate with each other directly. Additionally, users and the provider can now see each other's choices and rewards within a round, but users still cannot see other users' results. The group chat does not impact earnings, and revealing identities or making threats is prohibited.
Fm action situation without chat
The document provides instructions for a decision exercise where participants can earn money by making investment decisions. Participants will be randomly assigned to a group of 5 and must complete the 30-40 minute exercise without interruptions. They can earn $1 for viewing instructions, $1.5 for completing it, and up to $8 more based on decision outcomes. The exercise involves allocating tokens between private economic activities near or far from a river, and public infrastructure to control flooding from the river. Participants' earnings will depend on their group's collective decisions.
Fm action situation with chat
This document provides instructions for a decision-making exercise where participants can earn money. It will involve making investment decisions either near or far from a river over multiple rounds. Investing near the river offers higher potential returns but also flood risk that depends on river levels. Participants can invest in public levee infrastructure or private economic activities each round. The levee infrastructure provides flood protection for all but earns no direct returns, while private investing earns based on returns and any flood losses. Participants will have opportunities to chat before rounds and must make decisions within time limits. A quiz and two practice rounds will prepare them for the actual exercise.
Baseline text instruction_jan 2021_final
This document provides instructions for participants in a decision-making exercise involving a public water supply system. It outlines:
1) There are two player types - a Provider who invests in system maintenance, and Users who consume water. Players will remain anonymous.
2) Users have options to pay for the current system, exit to another system, or petition the Provider to improve the system. The Provider chooses investment amounts.
3) Players' earnings depend on the decisions made and the resulting system performance, which fluctuates based on the Provider's investment.
4) The instructions explain the decision options and potential earnings outcomes for each round of the multiple-round exercise. Players have time limits to make decisions in
DEV-Instuction2-Pet
The document summarizes the changes to the second set of rounds of the experiment. For users, there is now a third option - PETITION - where they can request the provider improve performance while still paying 10 tokens, but it costs the user 2 tokens. For providers, handling a PETITION costs 5 tokens deducted from their earnings. The summary outlines the potential earnings outcomes for both users and providers given the different choice combinations.
DEV-Instruction1
This document provides instructions for participants in a decision-making exercise involving a public water supply system. It outlines:
1) There are two participant roles - Provider and Users. The Provider invests in and maintains the system. Users consume water and pay fees.
2) Users can either exit the area to access a stable water system, earning 10 tokens, or pay the Provider and receive variable earnings of 7-15 tokens if performance is high, or 5 tokens if low.
3) The Provider collects fees and can invest 5 or 15 tokens in maintenance. Earnings are fees minus investment. Investing 15 tokens generally leads to better performance than 5 tokens.
4) Performance and user earnings vary based
Water-Instruction1
The document provides instructions for a decision-making exercise involving a public water supply system. Players will be assigned roles of either Users or a Provider. Users can choose to pay for the service, petition about its performance, or exit to another area. The Provider decides how much of collected fees to invest in maintenance, affecting system performance. Over multiple rounds, players make these choices that determine their earnings, with the goal of maximizing benefits while facing costs and uncertainties about the system. Decision times are limited to help participants experience time pressures involved.
8 altrival text
The second set of rounds introduces a third option for farmers: investing in a privately owned alternative water source (ALT). Under the ALT option, farmers do not pay the provider and instead use water from a shared underground source via privately owned tubewells. The more farmers that choose the ALT option, the less water is available per farmer from the limited underground source. Farmers can still choose to pay the provider (PAY) or hold their tokens (HOLD) as before. The provider also still has the options to invest in irrigation infrastructure or keep collected tokens. The rounds will now involve decisions from farmers between the three options and a decision from the provider on whether to invest or keep tokens.
9 altrival+petition text
The document provides instructions for the second set of rounds of a game involving farmers and a provider. There are now four options for farmers: 1) pay tokens and use the public irrigation infrastructure, 2) hold tokens without paying, 3) invest in a privately owned alternative water source, or 4) petition the provider to improve infrastructure while still paying. The private water sources draw from a shared underground source, so having more farmers choose that option reduces the available water. Farmers who petition bear a cost and deduct tokens from the provider's earnings. The provider again chooses whether to keep tokens received or invest in infrastructure improvements. The earnings for farmers and provider depend on the infrastructure functionality and choices made.
7 alt+petition+chat text
The document provides instructions for the second set of rounds of an experiment involving farmers and a provider. There are three key changes from the previous rounds:
1) Farmers now have four options - to PAY, HOLD, invest in a private ALTernative water source, or PETITION the provider. PETITIONing costs the farmer 2 tokens and deducts 5 tokens from the provider's earnings.
2) The provider still chooses between INVESTING or KEEPING tokens, but will have 5 tokens deducted for each PETITION.
3) Participants can communicate via text chat for 60 seconds at the start of each round to discuss the exercise, but cannot reveal identities or promise side payments.
E
6 alt+petition text
The document provides instructions for the second set of rounds of a game involving farmers and a provider. There are now four options for farmers: 1) pay tokens to use the public irrigation infrastructure, 2) hold tokens without paying, 3) invest in a private alternative water source, or 4) petition the provider while still paying tokens. Farmers who pay or petition may earn more tokens depending on the infrastructure's functionality. The provider can keep tokens received or invest to improve the infrastructure, with earnings reduced for each farmer petition. An example illustrates potential farmer decisions and resulting provider earnings.
5 petition+chat text
1) Farmers now have three options - PAY, HOLD, or PETITION. PAY and HOLD have the same outcomes as before. PETITION costs the farmer 2 tokens but deducts 5 from the provider if infrastructure is improved.
2) There is now a 60 second group chat at the start for farmers and provider to discuss the exercise within limits.
3) The provider's options remain KEEP or INVEST. Each PETITION deducts 5 tokens from the provider's earnings after collecting tokens from farmers and making infrastructure investments.
4 alt+chat text
- Farmers now have 3 options each round: PAY their 10 tokens to use the public infrastructure; HOLD their 10 tokens without paying; or invest in a private ALT water source.
- The provider can choose to KEEP all tokens received or INVEST 15 tokens to maintain the public infrastructure.
- If the infrastructure is fully functional after an investment, farmers who paid earn 15 tokens; if only minimally functional, they earn 5 tokens.
- A new addition is a 60-second group chat at the start of each round for farmers and provider to discuss the exercise within limits.
0 new base text final nov17
- Farmers are endowed with 10 tokens each round and can choose to HOLD or PAY their tokens
- If they PAY, their earnings depend on whether the irrigation infrastructure is fully or minimally functional
- A provider collects tokens from paying farmers and can choose to INVEST in infrastructure maintenance or KEEP the tokens
- It costs 15 tokens to make the infrastructure fully functional through investment
- Farmers and providers will make decisions anonymously over multiple rounds with earnings depending on the choices made
3 comm text-final
The second set of rounds allows for text-based communication in a chatroom between three farmers and the provider. Participants can send messages for 60 seconds at the beginning of each round to discuss any aspect of the exercise except promising side payments or revealing identities. As in the previous rounds, farmers can choose to hold or pay and the provider can choose to keep or invest, with earnings determined solely by these choices.
2 petition text-final
The second set of rounds is similar to the previous rounds but introduces a third option for farmers called "PETITION". Under this option, farmers can petition the provider to improve infrastructure while still paying 10 tokens, but they will bear a cost of 2 tokens deducted from their earnings. The provider will also have 5 tokens deducted for each petition. Farmers can now choose between HOLD, PAY, or PETITION. Their earnings will depend on their choice and whether infrastructure is fully or minimally functional. The provider's options remain KEEP or INVEST, but their earnings will now be reduced by 5 tokens for each farmer's petition. An example is provided to illustrate potential farmer and provider earnings.
1 alt text-final
The document provides instructions for the second set of rounds of a decision exercise involving farmers and a provider. There are now three options for farmers: 1) Pay tokens and use the public irrigation infrastructure, 2) Keep tokens without paying, or 3) Invest in a private alternative water source. The provider still has options to Invest tokens in infrastructure maintenance or Keep tokens. Farmers who pay will earn 15 tokens if infrastructure is fully functional or 5 tokens if minimally functional. Farmers who choose the private alternative will earn 11 tokens. The provider will earn all tokens received if keeping them, or tokens remaining after a 15 token infrastructure investment. A sample calculation is provided.
0 base text-final
- Farmers can choose to HOLD or PAY fees to maintain shared irrigation infrastructure. PAYING allows higher crop yields if infrastructure is functional, lower if not.
- A provider collects fees and can INVEST in infrastructure or KEEP fees. INVESTING fully functions infrastructure and benefits farmers and provider.
- For the infrastructure to be fully functional, at least two farmers must PAY and the provider must INVEST collected fees. This benefits all by allowing higher crop yields and earnings.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/y977uz6bpd3af4qsebv7r9b7s21935vdDRUGS AND ITS classification slide share
Any substance (other than food) that is used to prevent, diagnose, treat, or relieve symptoms of a
disease or abnormal condition
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
More Related Content
More from peyoba
Fm action situation without chat
The document provides instructions for a decision exercise where participants can earn money by making investment decisions. Participants will be randomly assigned to a group of 5 and must complete the 30-40 minute exercise without interruptions. They can earn $1 for viewing instructions, $1.5 for completing it, and up to $8 more based on decision outcomes. The exercise involves allocating tokens between private economic activities near or far from a river, and public infrastructure to control flooding from the river. Participants' earnings will depend on their group's collective decisions.
Fm action situation with chat
This document provides instructions for a decision-making exercise where participants can earn money. It will involve making investment decisions either near or far from a river over multiple rounds. Investing near the river offers higher potential returns but also flood risk that depends on river levels. Participants can invest in public levee infrastructure or private economic activities each round. The levee infrastructure provides flood protection for all but earns no direct returns, while private investing earns based on returns and any flood losses. Participants will have opportunities to chat before rounds and must make decisions within time limits. A quiz and two practice rounds will prepare them for the actual exercise.
Baseline text instruction_jan 2021_final
This document provides instructions for participants in a decision-making exercise involving a public water supply system. It outlines:
1) There are two player types - a Provider who invests in system maintenance, and Users who consume water. Players will remain anonymous.
2) Users have options to pay for the current system, exit to another system, or petition the Provider to improve the system. The Provider chooses investment amounts.
3) Players' earnings depend on the decisions made and the resulting system performance, which fluctuates based on the Provider's investment.
4) The instructions explain the decision options and potential earnings outcomes for each round of the multiple-round exercise. Players have time limits to make decisions in
DEV-Instuction2-Pet
The document summarizes the changes to the second set of rounds of the experiment. For users, there is now a third option - PETITION - where they can request the provider improve performance while still paying 10 tokens, but it costs the user 2 tokens. For providers, handling a PETITION costs 5 tokens deducted from their earnings. The summary outlines the potential earnings outcomes for both users and providers given the different choice combinations.
DEV-Instruction1
This document provides instructions for participants in a decision-making exercise involving a public water supply system. It outlines:
1) There are two participant roles - Provider and Users. The Provider invests in and maintains the system. Users consume water and pay fees.
2) Users can either exit the area to access a stable water system, earning 10 tokens, or pay the Provider and receive variable earnings of 7-15 tokens if performance is high, or 5 tokens if low.
3) The Provider collects fees and can invest 5 or 15 tokens in maintenance. Earnings are fees minus investment. Investing 15 tokens generally leads to better performance than 5 tokens.
4) Performance and user earnings vary based
Water-Instruction1
The document provides instructions for a decision-making exercise involving a public water supply system. Players will be assigned roles of either Users or a Provider. Users can choose to pay for the service, petition about its performance, or exit to another area. The Provider decides how much of collected fees to invest in maintenance, affecting system performance. Over multiple rounds, players make these choices that determine their earnings, with the goal of maximizing benefits while facing costs and uncertainties about the system. Decision times are limited to help participants experience time pressures involved.
8 altrival text
The second set of rounds introduces a third option for farmers: investing in a privately owned alternative water source (ALT). Under the ALT option, farmers do not pay the provider and instead use water from a shared underground source via privately owned tubewells. The more farmers that choose the ALT option, the less water is available per farmer from the limited underground source. Farmers can still choose to pay the provider (PAY) or hold their tokens (HOLD) as before. The provider also still has the options to invest in irrigation infrastructure or keep collected tokens. The rounds will now involve decisions from farmers between the three options and a decision from the provider on whether to invest or keep tokens.
9 altrival+petition text
The document provides instructions for the second set of rounds of a game involving farmers and a provider. There are now four options for farmers: 1) pay tokens and use the public irrigation infrastructure, 2) hold tokens without paying, 3) invest in a privately owned alternative water source, or 4) petition the provider to improve infrastructure while still paying. The private water sources draw from a shared underground source, so having more farmers choose that option reduces the available water. Farmers who petition bear a cost and deduct tokens from the provider's earnings. The provider again chooses whether to keep tokens received or invest in infrastructure improvements. The earnings for farmers and provider depend on the infrastructure functionality and choices made.
7 alt+petition+chat text
The document provides instructions for the second set of rounds of an experiment involving farmers and a provider. There are three key changes from the previous rounds:
1) Farmers now have four options - to PAY, HOLD, invest in a private ALTernative water source, or PETITION the provider. PETITIONing costs the farmer 2 tokens and deducts 5 tokens from the provider's earnings.
2) The provider still chooses between INVESTING or KEEPING tokens, but will have 5 tokens deducted for each PETITION.
3) Participants can communicate via text chat for 60 seconds at the start of each round to discuss the exercise, but cannot reveal identities or promise side payments.
E
6 alt+petition text
The document provides instructions for the second set of rounds of a game involving farmers and a provider. There are now four options for farmers: 1) pay tokens to use the public irrigation infrastructure, 2) hold tokens without paying, 3) invest in a private alternative water source, or 4) petition the provider while still paying tokens. Farmers who pay or petition may earn more tokens depending on the infrastructure's functionality. The provider can keep tokens received or invest to improve the infrastructure, with earnings reduced for each farmer petition. An example illustrates potential farmer decisions and resulting provider earnings.
5 petition+chat text
1) Farmers now have three options - PAY, HOLD, or PETITION. PAY and HOLD have the same outcomes as before. PETITION costs the farmer 2 tokens but deducts 5 from the provider if infrastructure is improved.
2) There is now a 60 second group chat at the start for farmers and provider to discuss the exercise within limits.
3) The provider's options remain KEEP or INVEST. Each PETITION deducts 5 tokens from the provider's earnings after collecting tokens from farmers and making infrastructure investments.
4 alt+chat text
- Farmers now have 3 options each round: PAY their 10 tokens to use the public infrastructure; HOLD their 10 tokens without paying; or invest in a private ALT water source.
- The provider can choose to KEEP all tokens received or INVEST 15 tokens to maintain the public infrastructure.
- If the infrastructure is fully functional after an investment, farmers who paid earn 15 tokens; if only minimally functional, they earn 5 tokens.
- A new addition is a 60-second group chat at the start of each round for farmers and provider to discuss the exercise within limits.
0 new base text final nov17
- Farmers are endowed with 10 tokens each round and can choose to HOLD or PAY their tokens
- If they PAY, their earnings depend on whether the irrigation infrastructure is fully or minimally functional
- A provider collects tokens from paying farmers and can choose to INVEST in infrastructure maintenance or KEEP the tokens
- It costs 15 tokens to make the infrastructure fully functional through investment
- Farmers and providers will make decisions anonymously over multiple rounds with earnings depending on the choices made
3 comm text-final
The second set of rounds allows for text-based communication in a chatroom between three farmers and the provider. Participants can send messages for 60 seconds at the beginning of each round to discuss any aspect of the exercise except promising side payments or revealing identities. As in the previous rounds, farmers can choose to hold or pay and the provider can choose to keep or invest, with earnings determined solely by these choices.
2 petition text-final
The second set of rounds is similar to the previous rounds but introduces a third option for farmers called "PETITION". Under this option, farmers can petition the provider to improve infrastructure while still paying 10 tokens, but they will bear a cost of 2 tokens deducted from their earnings. The provider will also have 5 tokens deducted for each petition. Farmers can now choose between HOLD, PAY, or PETITION. Their earnings will depend on their choice and whether infrastructure is fully or minimally functional. The provider's options remain KEEP or INVEST, but their earnings will now be reduced by 5 tokens for each farmer's petition. An example is provided to illustrate potential farmer and provider earnings.
1 alt text-final
The document provides instructions for the second set of rounds of a decision exercise involving farmers and a provider. There are now three options for farmers: 1) Pay tokens and use the public irrigation infrastructure, 2) Keep tokens without paying, or 3) Invest in a private alternative water source. The provider still has options to Invest tokens in infrastructure maintenance or Keep tokens. Farmers who pay will earn 15 tokens if infrastructure is fully functional or 5 tokens if minimally functional. Farmers who choose the private alternative will earn 11 tokens. The provider will earn all tokens received if keeping them, or tokens remaining after a 15 token infrastructure investment. A sample calculation is provided.
0 base text-final
- Farmers can choose to HOLD or PAY fees to maintain shared irrigation infrastructure. PAYING allows higher crop yields if infrastructure is functional, lower if not.
- A provider collects fees and can INVEST in infrastructure or KEEP fees. INVESTING fully functions infrastructure and benefits farmers and provider.
- For the infrastructure to be fully functional, at least two farmers must PAY and the provider must INVEST collected fees. This benefits all by allowing higher crop yields and earnings.
More from peyoba (17)
Recently uploaded
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/y977uz6bpd3af4qsebv7r9b7s21935vdDRUGS AND ITS classification slide share
Any substance (other than food) that is used to prevent, diagnose, treat, or relieve symptoms of a
disease or abnormal condition
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS Template 2023-2024 by: Irene S. Rueco
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit - NGV Pavilion Concept Design
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...National Information Standards Organization (NISO)
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.The Diamonds of 2023-2024 in the IGRA collection
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
Recently uploaded (20)
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Tr.4 broker network text_nov 2021_dy
- 1. Instructions for the 2nd set of rounds
- 2. What’s new? Text-based communication in a chatroom • The second set of rounds is identical to the previous rounds except for ONE change. • Now, every User can communicate with other Users using a chat window. • In addition, one of the Users (User 1) and the Provider can talk to each other using the chat window. • But the remaining two Users (Users 2 and 3) cannot talk to the Provider. • You can send text messages about any aspect of the exercise at the beginning of each round. However, there are two restrictions: 1) You are NOT allowed to promise the other players side- payments or threaten them with any consequence after the experiment is finished. 2) You are NOT allowed to reveal your real identity. • Note that chat conversation does NOT affect neither the Users’ nor the Provider's earnings.
- 3. Next, you and 3 other players will play the second set of rounds.
Editor's Notes
- The second set of rounds is identical to the previous rounds except one change – there is a third option for Users. That is, just like before, Users pay their 10 tokens and then take water from the public irrigation infrastructure to grow crop. This is the first option. The second option is that Users hold payment and just keep their 10 tokens. The THIRD option is that each User does not pay to the provider and instead, invests to an alternative water source that is privately owned. Users then take water from this private ALT to grow crop. It is important to note that because an ALT is privately owned, it is not affected by the decisions of other players.