This document discusses challenges around big data and the need for cross-domain interoperability in the Internet of Fair Data and Services (IFDS). It introduces the FAIR data principles which aim to make data findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable. The principles address metadata, identifiers, vocabularies and licensing. Adopting FAIR could reduce costs associated with data preparation and management. The IFDS builds on these principles to enable control and negotiation over digital resources across heterogeneous systems through an "hourglass" design. Communities are encouraged to define shared standards and services to improve interoperability according to FAIR.
Towards FAIR principles for research software @ FAIR Software Session, Nation...annalenalamprecht
Slides of a presentation about our paper "Towards FAIR Principles for Research Software" (https://doi.org/10.3233/DS-190026) that I gave at the Dutch National eScience Symposium 2019 in Amsterdam (https://www.esciencesymposium2019.nl/).
Abstract:
The FAIR Guiding Principles, published in 2016, aim to improve the findability, accessibility, interoperability and reusability of digital research objects for both humans and machines. Until now the FAIR principles have been mostly applied to research data. The ideas behind these principles are, however, also directly relevant to research software. Hence there is a distinct need to explore how the FAIR principles can be applied to software. In this work, we aim to summarize the current status of the debate around FAIR and software, as basis for the development of community-agreed principles for FAIR research software in the future. We discuss what makes software different from data with regard to the application of the FAIR principles, and which desired characteristics of research software go beyond FAIR. Then we present an analysis of where the existing principles can directly be applied to software, where they need to be adapted or reinterpreted, and where the definition of additional principles is required. Here interoperability has proven to be the most challenging principle, calling for particular attention in future discussions. Finally, we outline next steps on the way towards definite FAIR principles for research software.
IoTSE-based Open Database Vulnerability inspection in three Baltic Countries:...Anastasija Nikiforova
This presentation is devoted to the "IoTSE-based Open Database Vulnerability inspection in three Baltic Countries: ShoBEVODSDT sees you" research paper developed by Artjoms Daskevics and Anastasija Nikiforova and presented during the The International conference on Internet of Things, Systems, Management and Security (IOTSMS2021) co-located with The 8th International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS2021), December 6-9, 2021, Valencia, Spain (online)
Read paper here -> Daskevics, A., & Nikiforova, A. (2021, December). IoTSE-based open database vulnerability inspection in three Baltic countries: ShoBEVODSDT sees you. In 2021 8th International Conference on Internet of Things: Systems, Management and Security (IOTSMS) (pp. 1-8). IEEE -> https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9704952?casa_token=NfEjYuud0wEAAAAA:6QxucVPuY762I3qzD6D_oWqa0B9eMUFRNMG-E7dyHKohSYIzI0bH1V9bLaAcly_Lp-Ll52ghO5Y
Towards enrichment of the open government data: a stakeholder-centered determ...Anastasija Nikiforova
This set of slides is a part of the presentation prepared and delivered in the scope of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2021), 6-8 October, 2021, Smart Digital Governance for Global Sustainability
It is based on the paper -> Nikiforova, A. (2021, October). Towards enrichment of the open government data: a stakeholder-centered determination of High-Value Data sets for Latvia. In 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 367-372) -> https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3494193.3494243?casa_token=bPeuwmFWwQwAAAAA:ls-xXIPK5uXDHyxtBxqsMJOCuV6ud_ip59BX8n78uJnqvql6e8H9urlDG9zzeNklRmGFwI4sCXU06w
FAIR Data Knowledge Graphs–from Theory to PracticeTom Plasterer
FAIR data has flown up the hype curve without a clear sense of return from the required data stewardship investment. The killer use case for FAIR data is a science knowledge graph. It enables you to richly address novel questions of your and the world’s data. We started with data catalogues (findability) which exploited linked/referenced data using a few focused vocabularies (interoperability), for credentialed users (accessibility), with provenance and attribution (reusability) to make this happen. Our processes enable simple creation of dataset records and linking to source data, providing a seamless federated knowledge graph for novice and advanced users alike.
Presented May 7th, 2019 at the Knowledge Graph Conference, Columbia University.
An overview on FAIR Data and FAIR Data stewardship, and the roadmap for FAIR Data solutions coordinated by the Dutch Techcentre for Life Sciences. This presentation was given at the Netherlands eScience Center's "Essential skills in data-intensive research" course week.
Towards FAIR principles for research software @ FAIR Software Session, Nation...annalenalamprecht
Slides of a presentation about our paper "Towards FAIR Principles for Research Software" (https://doi.org/10.3233/DS-190026) that I gave at the Dutch National eScience Symposium 2019 in Amsterdam (https://www.esciencesymposium2019.nl/).
Abstract:
The FAIR Guiding Principles, published in 2016, aim to improve the findability, accessibility, interoperability and reusability of digital research objects for both humans and machines. Until now the FAIR principles have been mostly applied to research data. The ideas behind these principles are, however, also directly relevant to research software. Hence there is a distinct need to explore how the FAIR principles can be applied to software. In this work, we aim to summarize the current status of the debate around FAIR and software, as basis for the development of community-agreed principles for FAIR research software in the future. We discuss what makes software different from data with regard to the application of the FAIR principles, and which desired characteristics of research software go beyond FAIR. Then we present an analysis of where the existing principles can directly be applied to software, where they need to be adapted or reinterpreted, and where the definition of additional principles is required. Here interoperability has proven to be the most challenging principle, calling for particular attention in future discussions. Finally, we outline next steps on the way towards definite FAIR principles for research software.
IoTSE-based Open Database Vulnerability inspection in three Baltic Countries:...Anastasija Nikiforova
This presentation is devoted to the "IoTSE-based Open Database Vulnerability inspection in three Baltic Countries: ShoBEVODSDT sees you" research paper developed by Artjoms Daskevics and Anastasija Nikiforova and presented during the The International conference on Internet of Things, Systems, Management and Security (IOTSMS2021) co-located with The 8th International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS2021), December 6-9, 2021, Valencia, Spain (online)
Read paper here -> Daskevics, A., & Nikiforova, A. (2021, December). IoTSE-based open database vulnerability inspection in three Baltic countries: ShoBEVODSDT sees you. In 2021 8th International Conference on Internet of Things: Systems, Management and Security (IOTSMS) (pp. 1-8). IEEE -> https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9704952?casa_token=NfEjYuud0wEAAAAA:6QxucVPuY762I3qzD6D_oWqa0B9eMUFRNMG-E7dyHKohSYIzI0bH1V9bLaAcly_Lp-Ll52ghO5Y
Towards enrichment of the open government data: a stakeholder-centered determ...Anastasija Nikiforova
This set of slides is a part of the presentation prepared and delivered in the scope of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2021), 6-8 October, 2021, Smart Digital Governance for Global Sustainability
It is based on the paper -> Nikiforova, A. (2021, October). Towards enrichment of the open government data: a stakeholder-centered determination of High-Value Data sets for Latvia. In 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 367-372) -> https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3494193.3494243?casa_token=bPeuwmFWwQwAAAAA:ls-xXIPK5uXDHyxtBxqsMJOCuV6ud_ip59BX8n78uJnqvql6e8H9urlDG9zzeNklRmGFwI4sCXU06w
FAIR Data Knowledge Graphs–from Theory to PracticeTom Plasterer
FAIR data has flown up the hype curve without a clear sense of return from the required data stewardship investment. The killer use case for FAIR data is a science knowledge graph. It enables you to richly address novel questions of your and the world’s data. We started with data catalogues (findability) which exploited linked/referenced data using a few focused vocabularies (interoperability), for credentialed users (accessibility), with provenance and attribution (reusability) to make this happen. Our processes enable simple creation of dataset records and linking to source data, providing a seamless federated knowledge graph for novice and advanced users alike.
Presented May 7th, 2019 at the Knowledge Graph Conference, Columbia University.
An overview on FAIR Data and FAIR Data stewardship, and the roadmap for FAIR Data solutions coordinated by the Dutch Techcentre for Life Sciences. This presentation was given at the Netherlands eScience Center's "Essential skills in data-intensive research" course week.
LIBER Webinar: Are the FAIR Data Principles really fair?LIBER Europe
The FAIR Data Principles are a hot topic in research data managment. Their adoption within the H2020 funding programme means researchers now have to pay much more attention to how their share, publish and archive their data.
In this light, how can libraries help their research communities implement the FAIR principles? And write better data management plans?
This questions were addressed in a LIBER webinar containing some guidance and reflections on the principles themselves. Presented by Alastair Dunning, Head Research Data Services at the TU Delft (hosts of the 4TU.Centre for Research Data), it is based on a study of 37 data repositories (from subject specific repositories, to generic data archives, to national infrastructures), seeing how far they comply with each of the individual facets of the Data principles.
A talk prepared for Workshop Working on data stewardship? Meet your peers!
Datum: 03 OKT 2017
https://www.surf.nl/agenda/2017/10/workshop-working-on-data-stewardship-meet-your-peers/index.html
A very brief presentation on the FAIR data principles at a workshop on Traits data, especially picking out the challenges specific to this field (although the slides don't reflect this ;-) 17 May 2018
DataCite and its Members: Connecting Research and Identifying KnowledgeETH-Bibliothek
PIDs and their metadata support scholarly research and its increasing amounts and
variety of scholarly output. DataCite provides services which enable the research community to identify, connect, cite and track these outputs, making content FAIR. New
services include data level metrics and the use of identifiers for organizations and new
types of content, e.g. software, repositories and instruments. As an open, collaborative
and community driven membership organization we rely on our members for their
input and experience to build services that are beneficial for the research community
as a whole. DataCite services as well as current and future initiatives will be described
and it will be shown how members can contribute and benefit. Over the course of the
years, our membership has grown and diversified and we are therefore refreshing and
clarifying our member model. The new member model will be presented and described.
Towards metrics to assess and encourage FAIRnessMichel Dumontier
With an increased interest in the FAIR metrics, there is need to develop tools and appraoches that can assess the FAIRness of a digital resource. This talk begins to explore some ideas in this space, and invites people to participate in a working group focused on the development, application, and evaluation of FAIR metric efforts.
FAIR Data in Trustworthy Data Repositories Webinar - 12-13 December 2016| www...EUDAT
| www.eudat.eu | This webinar was co-organised by DANS, EUDAT and OpenAIRE and was held on 12th and 13th December 2016.
Everybody wants to play FAIR, but how do we put the principles into practice?
There is a growing demand for quality criteria for research datasets. In this webinar we will argue that the DSA (Data Seal of Approval for data repositories) and FAIR principles get as close as possible to giving quality criteria for research data. They do not do this by trying to make value judgements about the content of datasets, but rather by qualifying the fitness for data reuse in an impartial and measurable way. By bringing the ideas of the DSA and FAIR together, we will be able to offer an operationalization that can be implemented in any certified Trustworthy Digital Repository.
In 2014 the FAIR Guiding Principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) were formulated. The well-chosen FAIR acronym is highly attractive: it is one of these ideas that almost automatically get stuck in your mind once you have heard it. In a relatively short term, the FAIR data principles have been adopted by many stakeholder groups, including research funders.
The FAIR principles are remarkably similar to the underlying principles of DSA (2005): the data can be found on the Internet, are accessible (clear rights and licenses), in a usable format, reliable and are identified in a unique and persistent way so that they can be referred to. Essentially, the DSA presents quality criteria for digital repositories, whereas the FAIR principles target individual datasets.
In this webinar the two sets of principles will be discussed and compared and a tangible operationalization will be presented.
The presentation gives an overview of what metadata is and why it is important. It also addresses the benefits that metadata can bring and offers advice and tips on how to produce good quality metadata and, to close, how EUDAT uses metadata in the B2FIND service.
November 2016
PA webinar on benefits & costs of FAIR implementation in life sciences Pistoia Alliance
The slides from the Pistoia Alliance Debates Webinar where a panel of experts from technology support providers and the biopharma industry, who have been invited to share their views on the "Benefits and costs of FAIR Implementation for life science industry".
A presentation of the Dutch Techcentre for Life Sciences FAIR Data ecosystem given at the BlueBridge workshop, a pre-event of the Research Data Alliance's 9th Plenary
LIBER Webinar: Are the FAIR Data Principles really fair?LIBER Europe
The FAIR Data Principles are a hot topic in research data managment. Their adoption within the H2020 funding programme means researchers now have to pay much more attention to how their share, publish and archive their data.
In this light, how can libraries help their research communities implement the FAIR principles? And write better data management plans?
This questions were addressed in a LIBER webinar containing some guidance and reflections on the principles themselves. Presented by Alastair Dunning, Head Research Data Services at the TU Delft (hosts of the 4TU.Centre for Research Data), it is based on a study of 37 data repositories (from subject specific repositories, to generic data archives, to national infrastructures), seeing how far they comply with each of the individual facets of the Data principles.
A talk prepared for Workshop Working on data stewardship? Meet your peers!
Datum: 03 OKT 2017
https://www.surf.nl/agenda/2017/10/workshop-working-on-data-stewardship-meet-your-peers/index.html
A very brief presentation on the FAIR data principles at a workshop on Traits data, especially picking out the challenges specific to this field (although the slides don't reflect this ;-) 17 May 2018
DataCite and its Members: Connecting Research and Identifying KnowledgeETH-Bibliothek
PIDs and their metadata support scholarly research and its increasing amounts and
variety of scholarly output. DataCite provides services which enable the research community to identify, connect, cite and track these outputs, making content FAIR. New
services include data level metrics and the use of identifiers for organizations and new
types of content, e.g. software, repositories and instruments. As an open, collaborative
and community driven membership organization we rely on our members for their
input and experience to build services that are beneficial for the research community
as a whole. DataCite services as well as current and future initiatives will be described
and it will be shown how members can contribute and benefit. Over the course of the
years, our membership has grown and diversified and we are therefore refreshing and
clarifying our member model. The new member model will be presented and described.
Towards metrics to assess and encourage FAIRnessMichel Dumontier
With an increased interest in the FAIR metrics, there is need to develop tools and appraoches that can assess the FAIRness of a digital resource. This talk begins to explore some ideas in this space, and invites people to participate in a working group focused on the development, application, and evaluation of FAIR metric efforts.
FAIR Data in Trustworthy Data Repositories Webinar - 12-13 December 2016| www...EUDAT
| www.eudat.eu | This webinar was co-organised by DANS, EUDAT and OpenAIRE and was held on 12th and 13th December 2016.
Everybody wants to play FAIR, but how do we put the principles into practice?
There is a growing demand for quality criteria for research datasets. In this webinar we will argue that the DSA (Data Seal of Approval for data repositories) and FAIR principles get as close as possible to giving quality criteria for research data. They do not do this by trying to make value judgements about the content of datasets, but rather by qualifying the fitness for data reuse in an impartial and measurable way. By bringing the ideas of the DSA and FAIR together, we will be able to offer an operationalization that can be implemented in any certified Trustworthy Digital Repository.
In 2014 the FAIR Guiding Principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) were formulated. The well-chosen FAIR acronym is highly attractive: it is one of these ideas that almost automatically get stuck in your mind once you have heard it. In a relatively short term, the FAIR data principles have been adopted by many stakeholder groups, including research funders.
The FAIR principles are remarkably similar to the underlying principles of DSA (2005): the data can be found on the Internet, are accessible (clear rights and licenses), in a usable format, reliable and are identified in a unique and persistent way so that they can be referred to. Essentially, the DSA presents quality criteria for digital repositories, whereas the FAIR principles target individual datasets.
In this webinar the two sets of principles will be discussed and compared and a tangible operationalization will be presented.
The presentation gives an overview of what metadata is and why it is important. It also addresses the benefits that metadata can bring and offers advice and tips on how to produce good quality metadata and, to close, how EUDAT uses metadata in the B2FIND service.
November 2016
PA webinar on benefits & costs of FAIR implementation in life sciences Pistoia Alliance
The slides from the Pistoia Alliance Debates Webinar where a panel of experts from technology support providers and the biopharma industry, who have been invited to share their views on the "Benefits and costs of FAIR Implementation for life science industry".
A presentation of the Dutch Techcentre for Life Sciences FAIR Data ecosystem given at the BlueBridge workshop, a pre-event of the Research Data Alliance's 9th Plenary
Presentation by Luiz Olavo Bonino, Dutch Techcentre & Vrije University Amsterdam.
As one of the organisations present at the Lorentz workshop in January 2014 where the concept of FAIR Data has been created, the Dutch Techcentre for Life Sciences has, since then, worked on a number of solutions to support the adoption and dissemination of the FAIR Data Principles. This presentation presents the ecosystem on how to support FAIR data.
In an expert webinar on April 15th 2020 we discussed (in Finnish) how the FAIR data principles affect service development in RDM services. I presented some relevant outputs from the FAIRsFAIR project. These are the slides (in English). The webinar will be published on the fairdata.fi service site https://www.fairdata.fi/koulutus/koulutuksen-tallenteet/
FAIR Data
Principles
FAIR vs Open Data
Implementing FAIR & FAIRmetrics
FAIRness de ASIO-HERCULES
Research Objects
Definition
Standard RO-CRATE
Usage examples
The FAIR Data Principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable), published
on Scientific Data in 2016, are a set of guiding principles proposed by a consortium of
scientists and organizations to support the reusability of digital assets. It has since been
adopted by research institutions worldwide. The guidelines are timely as we see
unprecedented volume, complexity, and creation speed of data.
Putting the L in front: from Open Data to Linked Open DataMartin Kaltenböck
Keynote presentation of Martin Kaltenböck (LOD2 project, Semantic Web Company) at the Government Linked Data Workshop in the course of the OGD Camp 2011 in Warsaw, Poland: Putting the L in front: from Open Data to Linked Open Data
FAIR data: what it means, how we achieve it, and the role of RDASarah Jones
Presentation on FAIR data, the FAIR Data Action Plan developed by the European Commission Expert Group and the role of the Research Data Alliance on implementing FAIR. The presentation was given at the RDAFinland workshop held on 6th June - https://www.csc.fi/web/training/-/rda_and_fair_supporting_finnish_researchers
dkNET Webinar: FAIR Data & Software in the Research Life Cycle 01/22/2021dkNET
Abstract
Good data stewardship is the cornerstone of knowledge, discovery, and innovation in research. The FAIR Data Principles address data creators, stewards, software engineers, publishers, and others to promote maximum use of research data. The principles can be used as a framework for fostering and extending research data services.
This talk will provide an overview of the FAIR principles and the drivers behind their development by a broad community of international stakeholders. We will explore a range of topics related to putting FAIR data into practice, including how and where data can be described, stored, and made discoverable (e.g., data repositories, metadata); methods for identifying and citing data; interoperability of (meta)data; best-practice examples; and tips for enabling data reuse (e.g., data licensing). Practical examples of how FAIR is applied will be provided along the way.
Presenter: Christopher Erdmann, Engagement, support, and training expert on the NHLBI BioData Catalyst project at University of North Carolina Renaissance Computing Institute
dkNET Webinars Information: https://dknet.org/about/webinar
LIBER Webinar: Turning FAIR Data Into RealityLIBER Europe
These slides relate to a LIBER Webinar given on 23 April 2018. Turning FAIR Data Into Reality — Progress and Plans from the European Commission FAIR Data Expert Group.
In this webinar, Simon Hodson, Executive Director of CODATA and Chair of the FAIR Data Expert Group, and Sarah Jones, Associate Director at the Digital Curation Centre and Rapporteur, reported on the Group’s progress.
FAIRy stories: the FAIR Data principles in theory and in practiceCarole Goble
https://ucsb.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZYod-ippz4pHtaJ0d3ERPIFy2QIvKqjwpXR
FAIRy stories: the FAIR Data principles in theory and in practice
The ‘FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship’ [1] launched a global dialogue within research and policy communities and started a journey to wider accessibility and reusability of data and preparedness for automation-readiness (I am one of the army of authors). Over the past 5 years FAIR has become a movement, a mantra and a methodology for scientific research and increasingly in the commercial and public sector. FAIR is now part of NIH, European Commission and OECD policy. But just figuring out what the FAIR principles really mean and how we implement them has proved more challenging than one might have guessed. To quote the novelist Rick Riordan “Fairness does not mean everyone gets the same. Fairness means everyone gets what they need”.
As a data infrastructure wrangler I lead and participate in projects implementing forms of FAIR in pan-national European biomedical Research Infrastructures. We apply web-based industry-lead approaches like Schema.org; work with big pharma on specialised FAIRification pipelines for legacy data; promote FAIR by Design methodologies and platforms into the researcher lab; and expand the principles of FAIR beyond data to computational workflows and digital objects. Many use Linked Data approaches.
In this talk I’ll use some of these projects to shine some light on the FAIR movement. Spoiler alert: although there are technical issues, the greatest challenges are social. FAIR is a team sport. Knowledge Graphs play a role – not just as consumers of FAIR data but as active contributors. To paraphrase another novelist, “It is a truth universally acknowledged that a Knowledge Graph must be in want of FAIR data.”
[1] Wilkinson, M., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 3, 160018 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Apresentação na mesa de conversa com pesquisadores sobre acesso aberto, diretrizes e elaboração de planos de gestão de dados da UNIRIO no dia 14 de junho de 2018.
Presentation by Luiz Olavo Bonino about the current state of the developments on FAIR Data supporting tools at the Dutch Techcentre for Life Sciences Partners Event on November 3-4 2016.
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptxdanishmna97
Pakdata Cf is a groundbreaking system designed to streamline and facilitate access to CNIC information. This innovative platform leverages advanced technology to provide users with efficient and secure access to their CNIC details.
Unlocking Productivity: Leveraging the Potential of Copilot in Microsoft 365, a presentation by Christoforos Vlachos, Senior Solutions Manager – Modern Workplace, Uni Systems
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdfPaige Cruz
Monitoring and observability aren’t traditionally found in software curriculums and many of us cobble this knowledge together from whatever vendor or ecosystem we were first introduced to and whatever is a part of your current company’s observability stack.
While the dev and ops silo continues to crumble….many organizations still relegate monitoring & observability as the purview of ops, infra and SRE teams. This is a mistake - achieving a highly observable system requires collaboration up and down the stack.
I, a former op, would like to extend an invitation to all application developers to join the observability party will share these foundational concepts to build on:
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to ProductionAggregage
Join Maher Hanafi, VP of Engineering at Betterworks, in this new session where he'll share a practical framework to transform Gen AI prototypes into impactful products! He'll delve into the complexities of data collection and management, model selection and optimization, and ensuring security, scalability, and responsible use.
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 daysAdtran
At WSTS 2024, Alon Stern explored the topic of parametric holdover and explained how recent research findings can be implemented in real-world PNT networks to achieve 100 nanoseconds of accuracy for up to 100 days.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 6DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 6. In this session, we will cover Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI webinar offers an in-depth exploration of leveraging cutting-edge technologies for test automation within the UiPath platform. Attendees will delve into the integration of generative AI, a test automation solution, with Open AI advanced natural language processing capabilities.
Throughout the session, participants will discover how this synergy empowers testers to automate repetitive tasks, enhance testing accuracy, and expedite the software testing life cycle. Topics covered include the seamless integration process, practical use cases, and the benefits of harnessing AI-driven automation for UiPath testing initiatives. By attending this webinar, testers, and automation professionals can gain valuable insights into harnessing the power of AI to optimize their test automation workflows within the UiPath ecosystem, ultimately driving efficiency and quality in software development processes.
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into integrating generative AI.
2. Understanding how this integration enhances test automation within the UiPath platform
3. Practical demonstrations
4. Exploration of real-world use cases illustrating the benefits of AI-driven test automation for UiPath
Topics covered:
What is generative AI
Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath integration with generative AI
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 5. In this session, we will cover CI/CD with devops.
Topics covered:
CI/CD with in UiPath
End-to-end overview of CI/CD pipeline with Azure devops
Speaker:
Lyndsey Byblow, Test Suite Sales Engineer @ UiPath, Inc.
Threats to mobile devices are more prevalent and increasing in scope and complexity. Users of mobile devices desire to take full advantage of the features
available on those devices, but many of the features provide convenience and capability but sacrifice security. This best practices guide outlines steps the users can take to better protect personal devices and information.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...Neo4j
Leonard Jayamohan, Partner & Generative AI Lead, Deloitte
This keynote will reveal how Deloitte leverages Neo4j’s graph power for groundbreaking digital twin solutions, achieving a staggering 100x performance boost. Discover the essential role knowledge graphs play in successful generative AI implementations. Plus, get an exclusive look at an innovative Neo4j + Generative AI solution Deloitte is developing in-house.
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024Neo4j
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
In his public lecture, Christian Timmerer provides insights into the fascinating history of video streaming, starting from its humble beginnings before YouTube to the groundbreaking technologies that now dominate platforms like Netflix and ORF ON. Timmerer also presents provocative contributions of his own that have significantly influenced the industry. He concludes by looking at future challenges and invites the audience to join in a discussion.
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex ProofsAlex Pruden
This paper presents Reef, a system for generating publicly verifiable succinct non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs that a committed document matches or does not match a regular expression. We describe applications such as proving the strength of passwords, the provenance of email despite redactions, the validity of oblivious DNS queries, and the existence of mutations in DNA. Reef supports the Perl Compatible Regular Expression syntax, including wildcards, alternation, ranges, capture groups, Kleene star, negations, and lookarounds. Reef introduces a new type of automata, Skipping Alternating Finite Automata (SAFA), that skips irrelevant parts of a document when producing proofs without undermining soundness, and instantiates SAFA with a lookup argument. Our experimental evaluation confirms that Reef can generate proofs for documents with 32M characters; the proofs are small and cheap to verify (under a second).
Paper: https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/1886
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AIVladimir Iglovikov, Ph.D.
Presented by Vladimir Iglovikov:
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/iglovikov/
- https://x.com/viglovikov
- https://www.instagram.com/ternaus/
This presentation delves into the journey of Albumentations.ai, a highly successful open-source library for data augmentation.
Created out of a necessity for superior performance in Kaggle competitions, Albumentations has grown to become a widely used tool among data scientists and machine learning practitioners.
This case study covers various aspects, including:
People: The contributors and community that have supported Albumentations.
Metrics: The success indicators such as downloads, daily active users, GitHub stars, and financial contributions.
Challenges: The hurdles in monetizing open-source projects and measuring user engagement.
Development Practices: Best practices for creating, maintaining, and scaling open-source libraries, including code hygiene, CI/CD, and fast iteration.
Community Building: Strategies for making adoption easy, iterating quickly, and fostering a vibrant, engaged community.
Marketing: Both online and offline marketing tactics, focusing on real, impactful interactions and collaborations.
Mental Health: Maintaining balance and not feeling pressured by user demands.
Key insights include the importance of automation, making the adoption process seamless, and leveraging offline interactions for marketing. The presentation also emphasizes the need for continuous small improvements and building a friendly, inclusive community that contributes to the project's growth.
Vladimir Iglovikov brings his extensive experience as a Kaggle Grandmaster, ex-Staff ML Engineer at Lyft, sharing valuable lessons and practical advice for anyone looking to enhance the adoption of their open-source projects.
Explore more about Albumentations and join the community at:
GitHub: https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations
Website: https://albumentations.ai/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/100504475
Twitter: https://x.com/albumentations
9. ENTERPRISE REALITY – HETEROGENEITY - CHALLENGES
Integrated Enterprise
Technologies
Providers
Platforms
How can I get to know what is available?
Where to get?
How to get?
How to integrate?
How to streamline it (re)use?
16. FAIR PRINCIPLES
Findable:
F1. (meta)data are assigned a globally unique and persistent
identifier;
F2. data are described with rich metadata;
F3. metadata clearly and explicitly include the identifier of the
data it describes;
F4. (meta)data are registered or indexed in a searchable
resource;
Accessible:
A1. (meta)data are retrievable by their identifier using a
standardized communications protocol;
A1.1 the protocol is open, free, and universally
implementable;
A1.2. the protocol allows for an authentication and
authorization procedure, where necessary;
A2. metadata are accessible, even when the data are no longer
available;
Interoperable:
I1. (meta)data use a formal, accessible, shared, and broadly
applicable language for knowledge representation.
I2. (meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles;
I3. (meta)data include qualified references to other
(meta)data;
Reusable:
R1. (meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and
relevant attributes;
R1.1. (meta)data are released with a clear and accessible data
usage license;
R1.2. (meta)data are associated with detailed provenance;
R1.3. (meta)data meet domain-relevant community
standards;
https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201618
17. WHAT FAIR PRINCIPLES ARE NOT!
FAIR is not a standard
FAIR is not equal to ‘Open’ or ‘Free’
FAIR is not equal to RDF, Linked Data, or Semantic Web
FAIR is not assuming that only humans can find and re-use data
FAIR is not for humans only but for machines as well
Digital resources that are not FAIR are pretty ‘Re-useless’…..
Cloudy, increasingly FAIR; revisiting the FAIR Data guiding principles for the European Open Science Cloud DOI: 10.3233/ISU-170824
http://www.purl.org/fair/principles-explained
18. EC TAKES ACTION: THE EUROPEAN OPEN SCIENCE CLOUD
Europe acknowledged the
problem
Moved for a solution: EOSC
Data Stewardship (DS) for
better discovery
Internet of Data of FAIR Data &
Services
Training of 500.000 data
experts
Financing
€2B for initial phase EOSC
5% of research grants for DS
DS market $100B annually
19. THE EUROPEAN OPEN SCIENCE CLOUD: WHAT’S IN A NAME
European
Open
Science
Cloud
21. GO FAIR NOW A GLOBAL MOVEMENT
Let’s GO
FAIR
“We support appropriate efforts to promote open science and facilitate appropriate access
to publicly funded research results on findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR)
principles.” (Statement 12)
http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-16-2967_en.htm
22. CURRENT STATUS EUROPE
3 Member States in the lead (NL, FR, DE)
7 additional Member States in the wings
GO FAIR International Office (funded by NL)
Main tasks:
International expansion
Coordination
Implementation Network support
Certification and training
6 Implementation Networks set up
Science Funders
Rare Diseases
Metabolomics
Training
Biodiversity (National History Museums)
OPEDAS (Other People’s Data and Services)
25. DATA EXPERT EFFORT
Source: Data Science Report 2016, CrowdFlower, 2016: http://visit.crowdflower.com/rs/416-ZBE-142/images/CrowdFlower_DataScienceReport_2016.pdf
26. DATA EXPERT EFFORT
Source: Data Science Report 2016, CrowdFlower, 2016: http://visit.crowdflower.com/rs/416-ZBE-142/images/CrowdFlower_DataScienceReport_2016.pdf
27. BREAK DOWN DATA EXPERT EFFORT PRINCIPLES
Findable:
F1. (meta)data are assigned a globally unique and persistent
identifier;
F2. data are described with rich metadata;
F3. metadata clearly and explicitly include the identifier of the
data it describes;
F4. (meta)data are registered or indexed in a searchable
resource;
Accessible:
A1. (meta)data are retrievable by their identifier using a
standardized communications protocol;
A1.1 the protocol is open, free, and universally
implementable;
A1.2. the protocol allows for an authentication and
authorization procedure, where necessary;
A2. metadata are accessible, even when the data are no longer
available;
Interoperable:
I1. (meta)data use a formal, accessible, shared, and broadly
applicable language for knowledge representation.
I2. (meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles;
I3. (meta)data include qualified references to other
(meta)data;
Reusable:
R1. (meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and
relevant attributes;
R1.1. (meta)data are released with a clear and accessible data
usage license;
R1.2. (meta)data are associated with detailed provenance;
R1.3. (meta)data meet domain-relevant community
standards;
19% of the time
60% of the time
Ifyou have found and accessed the data
28. SOURCE: Study on the cost of not having FAIR research data
A PwC study for DG RTD of the European Commission
COST OF NOT HAVING FAIR DATA
31. THE INTERNET
The Internet solved the problem of the
interoperability of heterogeneous networks
The hourglass design of the Internet system
enabled both interoperability and unparalleled
flexibility for extension
32. THE INTERNET OF FAIR DATA AND SERVICES
The IFDS aims at solving the problem of
interoperability of heterogeneous data, services
and compute
An hourglass design of the IFDS would enable
both interoperability and unparalleled flexibility
for extension
35. IFDS
Provide control over digital resources
Who
Where
How
Why
From the “owner” side, clearly describe:
Rights, conditions, requirements and access methods
From the user side, clearly describe:
Intentions and requirements
Support (machine-based) negotiation
36. FIRST INITIATIVES OF THE IFDS
https://vimeo.com/215975839https://vimeo.com/143245835
37. WHAT COMMUNITIES LIKE ENTERPRISE ENGINEERING CAN DO TO BE
(MORE) FAIR AND WHAT IS IN THERE FOR THEM?
38. FAIR DATA PRINCIPLES
Findable:
F1. (meta)data are assigned a globally unique and persistent
identifier;
F2. data are described with rich metadata;
F3. metadata clearly and explicitly include the identifier of the
data it describes;
F4. (meta)data are registered or indexed in a searchable
resource;
Accessible:
A1. (meta)data are retrievable by their identifier using a
standardized communications protocol;
A1.1 the protocol is open, free, and universally
implementable;
A1.2. the protocol allows for an authentication and
authorization procedure, where necessary;
A2. metadata are accessible, even when the data are no longer
available;
Interoperable:
I1. (meta)data use a formal, accessible, shared, and broadly
applicable language for knowledge representation.
I2. (meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles;
I3. (meta)data include qualified references to other
(meta)data;
Reusable:
R1. (meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and
relevant attributes;
R1.1. (meta)data are released with a clear and accessible data
usage license;
R1.2. (meta)data are associated with detailed provenance;
R1.3. (meta)data meet domain-relevant community
standards;
https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201618
39. FAIR DATA PRINCIPLES - METADATA
Findable:
F1. metadata are assigned a globally unique and persistent
identifier;
F2. data are described with rich metadata;
F3. metadata clearly and explicitly include the identifier of the
data it describes;
F4. metadata are registered or indexed in a searchable
resource;
Accessible:
A1. metadata are retrievable by their identifier using a
standardized communications protocol;
A1.1 the protocol is open, free, and universally
implementable;
A1.2. the protocol allows for an authentication and
authorization procedure, where necessary;
A2. metadata are accessible, even when the data are no longer
available;
Interoperable:
I1. metadata use a formal, accessible, shared, and broadly
applicable language for knowledge representation.
I2. metadata use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles;
I3. metadata include qualified references to other metadata;
Reusable:
R1. metadata are richly described with a plurality of accurate and
relevant attributes;
R1.1. metadata are released with a clear and accessible data
usage license;
R1.2. metadata are associated with detailed provenance;
R1.3. metadata meet domain-relevant community standards;
https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201618
40. FAIR DATA PRINCIPLES - DATA
Findable:
F1. data are assigned a globally unique and persistent
identifier;
F2. data are described with rich metadata;
F3. metadata clearly and explicitly include the identifier of the
data it describes;
F4. metadata are registered or indexed in a searchable
resource;
Accessible:
A1. metadata are retrievable by their identifier using a
standardized communications protocol;
A1.1 the protocol is open, free, and universally
implementable;
A1.2. the protocol allows for an authentication and
authorization procedure, where necessary;
A2. metadata are accessible, even when the data are no longer
available;
Interoperable:
I1. metadata use a formal, accessible, shared, and broadly
applicable language for knowledge representation.
I2. metadata use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles;
I3. metadata include qualified references to other (meta)data;
Reusable:
R1. metadata are richly described with a plurality of accurate and
relevant attributes;
R1.1. metadata are released with a clear and accessible data
usage license;
R1.2. metadata are associated with detailed provenance;
R1.3. metadata meet domain-relevant community standards;
https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201618
41. FAIR DATA PRINCIPLES – SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE
Findable:
F1. (meta)data are assigned a globally unique and
persistent identifier;
F2. data are described with rich metadata;
F3. metadata clearly and explicitly include the identifier
of the data it describes;
F4. (meta)data are registered or indexed in a searchable
resource;
Accessible:
A1. (meta)data are retrievable by their identifier using a
standardized communications protocol;
A1.1 the protocol is open, free, and universally
implementable;
A1.2. the protocol allows for an authentication and
authorization procedure, where necessary;
A2. metadata are accessible, even when the data are no
longer available;
Interoperable:
I1. (meta)data use a formal, accessible, shared, and
broadly applicable language for knowledge
representation.
I2. (meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR
principles;
I3. (meta)data include qualified references to other
(meta)data;
Reusable:
R1. (meta)data are richly described with a plurality of
accurate and relevant attributes;
R1.1. (meta)data are released with a clear and
accessible data usage license;
R1.2. (meta)data are associated with detailed
provenance;
R1.3. (meta)data meet domain-relevant community
standards;
https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201618
42. BENEFITS OF GOING FAIR
Improve in intra- and inter-domain interoperability;
Improve efficiency in dealing with digital resources;
Join a global initiative;
Availability of more FAIR digital resources;
Decrease “time-to-market” integrated solutions;
…
43. WHAT CAN COMMUNITIES DO?
Metadata elements for commonly used digital resources. E.g. metadata
elements for EE models;
Preferred reference conceptual models (vocabularies, schemas, ontologies,
etc., …);
Define semantic models for commonly used resources (datasets, services, etc.)
Offer community-specific services like vocabularies services, model
repositories, …;
Mechanisms to connects models representing different enterprise
perspectives (and using differencing modeling languages)
44. Q&A – CONTACT INFO
Luiz Bonino
International Technology Coordinator – GO FAIR
Associate Professor BioSemantics – LUMC
E-mail: luiz.bonino@go-fair.org
Skype: luizolavobonino
Web: www.go-fair.org
LET’S GO FAIR?
Editor's Notes
Het onderliggende probleem is “fragmentatie”. De stukjes van de puzzel hebben we wel beschikbaar, maar die zijn verspreid over heel veel partijen in dit land. Deze versplintering zie je op alle vlakken die op deze dia genoemd worden: data, sample collecties, etc. Om onderzoek goed te laten renderen met toepassingen die de zorg bereiken zijn faciliteiten nodig die nu nog verspreid zijn over veel onderzoeksgroepen en instellingen. Het organiseren hiervan tot een goed geoliede machine die het ons helpt personalised medicine & health research effectief te implementeren vergt een gezamenlijke inspanning. We hebben kortom nationale actie nodig om tot een gezamenlijke infrastructuur hiervoor te komen : Health-RI.
Het onderliggende probleem is “fragmentatie”. De stukjes van de puzzel hebben we wel beschikbaar, maar die zijn verspreid over heel veel partijen in dit land. Deze versplintering zie je op alle vlakken die op deze dia genoemd worden: data, sample collecties, etc. Om onderzoek goed te laten renderen met toepassingen die de zorg bereiken zijn faciliteiten nodig die nu nog verspreid zijn over veel onderzoeksgroepen en instellingen. Het organiseren hiervan tot een goed geoliede machine die het ons helpt personalised medicine & health research effectief te implementeren vergt een gezamenlijke inspanning. We hebben kortom nationale actie nodig om tot een gezamenlijke infrastructuur hiervoor te komen : Health-RI.
Het onderliggende probleem is “fragmentatie”. De stukjes van de puzzel hebben we wel beschikbaar, maar die zijn verspreid over heel veel partijen in dit land. Deze versplintering zie je op alle vlakken die op deze dia genoemd worden: data, sample collecties, etc. Om onderzoek goed te laten renderen met toepassingen die de zorg bereiken zijn faciliteiten nodig die nu nog verspreid zijn over veel onderzoeksgroepen en instellingen. Het organiseren hiervan tot een goed geoliede machine die het ons helpt personalised medicine & health research effectief te implementeren vergt een gezamenlijke inspanning. We hebben kortom nationale actie nodig om tot een gezamenlijke infrastructuur hiervoor te komen : Health-RI.
Het onderliggende probleem is “fragmentatie”. De stukjes van de puzzel hebben we wel beschikbaar, maar die zijn verspreid over heel veel partijen in dit land. Deze versplintering zie je op alle vlakken die op deze dia genoemd worden: data, sample collecties, etc. Om onderzoek goed te laten renderen met toepassingen die de zorg bereiken zijn faciliteiten nodig die nu nog verspreid zijn over veel onderzoeksgroepen en instellingen. Het organiseren hiervan tot een goed geoliede machine die het ons helpt personalised medicine & health research effectief te implementeren vergt een gezamenlijke inspanning. We hebben kortom nationale actie nodig om tot een gezamenlijke infrastructuur hiervoor te komen : Health-RI.
Het onderliggende probleem is “fragmentatie”. De stukjes van de puzzel hebben we wel beschikbaar, maar die zijn verspreid over heel veel partijen in dit land. Deze versplintering zie je op alle vlakken die op deze dia genoemd worden: data, sample collecties, etc. Om onderzoek goed te laten renderen met toepassingen die de zorg bereiken zijn faciliteiten nodig die nu nog verspreid zijn over veel onderzoeksgroepen en instellingen. Het organiseren hiervan tot een goed geoliede machine die het ons helpt personalised medicine & health research effectief te implementeren vergt een gezamenlijke inspanning. We hebben kortom nationale actie nodig om tot een gezamenlijke infrastructuur hiervoor te komen : Health-RI.
Het onderliggende probleem is “fragmentatie”. De stukjes van de puzzel hebben we wel beschikbaar, maar die zijn verspreid over heel veel partijen in dit land. Deze versplintering zie je op alle vlakken die op deze dia genoemd worden: data, sample collecties, etc. Om onderzoek goed te laten renderen met toepassingen die de zorg bereiken zijn faciliteiten nodig die nu nog verspreid zijn over veel onderzoeksgroepen en instellingen. Het organiseren hiervan tot een goed geoliede machine die het ons helpt personalised medicine & health research effectief te implementeren vergt een gezamenlijke inspanning. We hebben kortom nationale actie nodig om tot een gezamenlijke infrastructuur hiervoor te komen : Health-RI.
Het onderliggende probleem is “fragmentatie”. De stukjes van de puzzel hebben we wel beschikbaar, maar die zijn verspreid over heel veel partijen in dit land. Deze versplintering zie je op alle vlakken die op deze dia genoemd worden: data, sample collecties, etc. Om onderzoek goed te laten renderen met toepassingen die de zorg bereiken zijn faciliteiten nodig die nu nog verspreid zijn over veel onderzoeksgroepen en instellingen. Het organiseren hiervan tot een goed geoliede machine die het ons helpt personalised medicine & health research effectief te implementeren vergt een gezamenlijke inspanning. We hebben kortom nationale actie nodig om tot een gezamenlijke infrastructuur hiervoor te komen : Health-RI.
Het onderliggende probleem is “fragmentatie”. De stukjes van de puzzel hebben we wel beschikbaar, maar die zijn verspreid over heel veel partijen in dit land. Deze versplintering zie je op alle vlakken die op deze dia genoemd worden: data, sample collecties, etc. Om onderzoek goed te laten renderen met toepassingen die de zorg bereiken zijn faciliteiten nodig die nu nog verspreid zijn over veel onderzoeksgroepen en instellingen. Het organiseren hiervan tot een goed geoliede machine die het ons helpt personalised medicine & health research effectief te implementeren vergt een gezamenlijke inspanning. We hebben kortom nationale actie nodig om tot een gezamenlijke infrastructuur hiervoor te komen : Health-RI.
Who has or had access to my data?
Where are my data and where have they been used?
How are my data been used?
For what (why) purposes?