This chapter discusses thinking, intelligence, and problem solving. It defines thinking as the mental manipulation of representations. Schemas and categorization are important aspects of thinking, and schemas can lead to stereotypes. There are three main ways thinking is used: reasoning, decision making, and problem solving. Various heuristics and biases can influence decision making. Intelligence is measured using psychometric tests and is influenced by both genes and environment. Problem solving strategies include using subgoals, working backward, finding analogies, and gaining insight.
Business Ethics Rubric—Mid-term Case StudyI will be looking fo.docxRAHUL126667
Business Ethics Rubric—Mid-term Case Study
I will be looking for the following items in your Case Study Analysis.
Case studies that can be used: Lifeboat, Thinking Critically 1.2, Thinking Critically 1.1, Thinking Critically 2.1, Thinking Critically 2.2, Thinking Critically 2.3, Thinking Critically 3.2 and Thinking Critically 3.3
I. Developing a Practical Ethical Viewpoint (Have you clearly picked and stated an Ethical Viewpoint) (You need to choose one for each case study)
A. Utilitarianism
B. Universal Ethics
C. Ethical Relativism
D. Virtue Ethics
II. To help you choose the ethical theory do the following (By looking at the moral situations):
A. Interpret what is right and wrong according to each of the four theories
B. Give an argument that each theory might provide
C. State your own assessment of the strengths of each theory
D. State the weakness of each theory
III. Step 1: Analyze the Consequences.
Who will be helped by what you do? Who will be harmed? What kind of benefits and harm are we talking about? Who will be helped by what you do? Who will be harmed?
Step 2: Analyze the actions
Consider all the options from a different perspective, without thinking about the consequences. How do the actions measure up against moral principles like honesty, fairness, equality, respecting the dignity of others, and people’s rights? (Consider the common good.) Are any of the actions at odds with those standards? If there’s a conflict between principles or between the rights of different people involved, is there a way to see one principle as more important than the others? Which option offers actions that are least problematic?
Step 3: Make a decision
Make a decision. Take both parts of your analysis into account, and make a decision. This strategy at least gives you some basic steps you can follow.
1. What are the facts? Know the facts as best you can. If your facts are wrong, you’re liable to make a bad choice.
2. 2. What can you guess about the facts you don’t know? Since it is impossible to know all the facts, make reasonable assumptions about the missing pieces of information.
3. 3. What do the facts mean? Facts by themselves have no meaning. You need to interpret the information in light of the values that are important to you.
4. 4. What does the problem look like through the eyes of the people involved? The ability to walk in another’s shoes is essential. Understanding the problem through a variety of perspectives increases the possibility that you will choose wisely.
5. 5. What will happen if you choose one thing rather than another? All actions have consequences. Make a reasonable guess as to what will happen if you follow a particular course of action. Decide whether you think more good or harm will come of your action.
6. 6. What do your feelings tell you? Feelings are facts too. Your feelings about ethical issues may give you a clue as to parts of your decision that your rational mind may overlook.
7. 7. What will you ...
PART I – PROPOSAL(There will be 4 parts of this project, this is.docxkarlhennesey
PART I – PROPOSAL
(There will be 4 parts of this project, this is just part I)
(Don’t do the other parts yet)
Basic information:
· Length of assignment: one page
· Format: Typed in MLA format.
Directions for PART I:
Write a one-page proposal on the topic of your choice. It should answer these questions:
a. The topic are you writing about
b. Why it is a compelling ethical problem with a global scope? (briefly, why does this issue matter?)
c. What research you plan to do in writing about it
Components (There will be 4 Parts for this project)
1. Proposal (This is the one you have to do this time, don't do the others yet)
2. Annotated Bibliography (Next week)
3. Development Response
4. Final Project due
A more detailed look at each step
1. Proposal: A one-page proposal on the topic of your choice. It should answer these questions: the topic are you writing about; why it is a compelling ethical problem; why it is a global problem; and what research you plan to do in writing about it.
2. Annotated Bibliography: This part of the assignment, about 1½ pages, is a summary of the research you have done to this point. Typically, you will need three or four sources, which are a combination of informational research and of essays on ethical problems involved in the topic.
3. Development Response: This response, also about 1½ pages, is more than a rough draft. It is a self-reflexive response. That is, you will be writing about writing the essay. These topics include: what problems you think you are going to face, and how you plan to address them.
4. Final Project: The final project is the culmination of the work you have done all term. You will include all writing you have done thus far as a single document.
Notes:
1. You are responsible for choosing your own topic. I recommend putting time into the choice. I think it would save you much time and grief to find a topic that you don’t need to change between now and the next step in the assignment (Like Your Part II – Annotated Bibliography).
2. What is a “compelling ethical problem with a global scope”?
a. “Compelling”: For a topic to be compelling means that it demands the attention of others. That is, because or if it isn’t addressed, then some terrible or injustice is occurring or will occur. One way to test your topic is to ask yourself two questions: 1) Does this topic matter to me?; and 2) Do I believe that this topic should matter to other people?
b. “Ethical”: How does this issue demonstrate either a failure to fulfill an important obligation or a failure to achieve a good or better outcome?
c. “With a global scope”: The topic does not need to touch everyone in the world, but it does need to show how an issue can touch different parts of the globe or is an example of a problem that we might find in several places throughout the world. For example, one nation’s struggle with immigration might be seen in many other nations.
3. What are examples of possible topics? You will need to co ...
Problem solving and critical thinking refers to the ability to use knowledge, facts, and data to effectively solve problems. This doesn't mean you need to have an immediate answer, it means you have to be able to think on your feet, assess problems and find solutions.
A good response to others is not something like I agree. Please .docxransayo
A good response to others is not something like "I agree." Please find something that you can analyze, add to, critique, explain, disagree with, or something. It should be a few cogent sentences. It should contain something that shows your knowledge of the subject, as well as additional materials you might bring from the web and elsewhere.
You should create substantial responses to your peers. Think of this as your opportunity to teach. Create substantial responses which expand on a point and present information on the topic. Your responses should demonstrate your critical thinking on the topic.
Respond to the following discussions (6X). Write how you would respond to their discussions with approximately 100 words or more each. Be thoughtful and insightful and it must demonstrate critical thinking and analysis.
How does scientific inquiry try to avoid the common pitfalls that produce error in nonscientific inquiry?
1.There are common pitfall errors involved when using nonscientific inquires because nonscientific inquiries do not follow the scientific method. The scientific method is used as a model of science. The scientific method is what scientists use to do research. The scientific method involves, "...three main elements in the traditional model of science, typically presented in the order in which they are implemented: theory, operationalization, and observation" (Babbie.) A theory is formed from scientists. This theory then goes into the operationalization stage. During the operationalization stage, the variables involved in the theory are specified. After operationalization comes the observation stage. During the observation stage, the theory is tested in real life. The observations are measured and then turned into a hypothesis that can be tested. With nonscientific inquiry, errors such as overgeneralization, inaccurate observations, and illogical reasoning may happen. Using scientific inquiry, and the scientific method, reduces these errors. Using scientific inquiry is needed to make any kind of scientific theory.
2. Nonscientific inquiry is basically the action of observation. It is done countless times a day by everyone whether they realize it or not. It is similar to the idea of assumptions without the backing of any scientific support. The book give the example of knowing is going to rain when the trick knee starts acting up. Is this real or a perceived notion that seems to coincide for an individual enough for them to believe it is true.
The scientific inquiry differs because it takes guess work out of the equation. It utilizes the processes of logic and observation as well as data collection and analysis (Babbie,2017).Utilizing these scientific tools to establish an outcome or understanding provides a more realistic and accurate account of what is being seen and done.
Scientific inquiry Is important in the efforts of avoiding bias and/or falsification of data as well as oversimplification or possible dishonesty whether.
Business Ethics Rubric—Mid-term Case StudyI will be looking fo.docxRAHUL126667
Business Ethics Rubric—Mid-term Case Study
I will be looking for the following items in your Case Study Analysis.
Case studies that can be used: Lifeboat, Thinking Critically 1.2, Thinking Critically 1.1, Thinking Critically 2.1, Thinking Critically 2.2, Thinking Critically 2.3, Thinking Critically 3.2 and Thinking Critically 3.3
I. Developing a Practical Ethical Viewpoint (Have you clearly picked and stated an Ethical Viewpoint) (You need to choose one for each case study)
A. Utilitarianism
B. Universal Ethics
C. Ethical Relativism
D. Virtue Ethics
II. To help you choose the ethical theory do the following (By looking at the moral situations):
A. Interpret what is right and wrong according to each of the four theories
B. Give an argument that each theory might provide
C. State your own assessment of the strengths of each theory
D. State the weakness of each theory
III. Step 1: Analyze the Consequences.
Who will be helped by what you do? Who will be harmed? What kind of benefits and harm are we talking about? Who will be helped by what you do? Who will be harmed?
Step 2: Analyze the actions
Consider all the options from a different perspective, without thinking about the consequences. How do the actions measure up against moral principles like honesty, fairness, equality, respecting the dignity of others, and people’s rights? (Consider the common good.) Are any of the actions at odds with those standards? If there’s a conflict between principles or between the rights of different people involved, is there a way to see one principle as more important than the others? Which option offers actions that are least problematic?
Step 3: Make a decision
Make a decision. Take both parts of your analysis into account, and make a decision. This strategy at least gives you some basic steps you can follow.
1. What are the facts? Know the facts as best you can. If your facts are wrong, you’re liable to make a bad choice.
2. 2. What can you guess about the facts you don’t know? Since it is impossible to know all the facts, make reasonable assumptions about the missing pieces of information.
3. 3. What do the facts mean? Facts by themselves have no meaning. You need to interpret the information in light of the values that are important to you.
4. 4. What does the problem look like through the eyes of the people involved? The ability to walk in another’s shoes is essential. Understanding the problem through a variety of perspectives increases the possibility that you will choose wisely.
5. 5. What will happen if you choose one thing rather than another? All actions have consequences. Make a reasonable guess as to what will happen if you follow a particular course of action. Decide whether you think more good or harm will come of your action.
6. 6. What do your feelings tell you? Feelings are facts too. Your feelings about ethical issues may give you a clue as to parts of your decision that your rational mind may overlook.
7. 7. What will you ...
PART I – PROPOSAL(There will be 4 parts of this project, this is.docxkarlhennesey
PART I – PROPOSAL
(There will be 4 parts of this project, this is just part I)
(Don’t do the other parts yet)
Basic information:
· Length of assignment: one page
· Format: Typed in MLA format.
Directions for PART I:
Write a one-page proposal on the topic of your choice. It should answer these questions:
a. The topic are you writing about
b. Why it is a compelling ethical problem with a global scope? (briefly, why does this issue matter?)
c. What research you plan to do in writing about it
Components (There will be 4 Parts for this project)
1. Proposal (This is the one you have to do this time, don't do the others yet)
2. Annotated Bibliography (Next week)
3. Development Response
4. Final Project due
A more detailed look at each step
1. Proposal: A one-page proposal on the topic of your choice. It should answer these questions: the topic are you writing about; why it is a compelling ethical problem; why it is a global problem; and what research you plan to do in writing about it.
2. Annotated Bibliography: This part of the assignment, about 1½ pages, is a summary of the research you have done to this point. Typically, you will need three or four sources, which are a combination of informational research and of essays on ethical problems involved in the topic.
3. Development Response: This response, also about 1½ pages, is more than a rough draft. It is a self-reflexive response. That is, you will be writing about writing the essay. These topics include: what problems you think you are going to face, and how you plan to address them.
4. Final Project: The final project is the culmination of the work you have done all term. You will include all writing you have done thus far as a single document.
Notes:
1. You are responsible for choosing your own topic. I recommend putting time into the choice. I think it would save you much time and grief to find a topic that you don’t need to change between now and the next step in the assignment (Like Your Part II – Annotated Bibliography).
2. What is a “compelling ethical problem with a global scope”?
a. “Compelling”: For a topic to be compelling means that it demands the attention of others. That is, because or if it isn’t addressed, then some terrible or injustice is occurring or will occur. One way to test your topic is to ask yourself two questions: 1) Does this topic matter to me?; and 2) Do I believe that this topic should matter to other people?
b. “Ethical”: How does this issue demonstrate either a failure to fulfill an important obligation or a failure to achieve a good or better outcome?
c. “With a global scope”: The topic does not need to touch everyone in the world, but it does need to show how an issue can touch different parts of the globe or is an example of a problem that we might find in several places throughout the world. For example, one nation’s struggle with immigration might be seen in many other nations.
3. What are examples of possible topics? You will need to co ...
Problem solving and critical thinking refers to the ability to use knowledge, facts, and data to effectively solve problems. This doesn't mean you need to have an immediate answer, it means you have to be able to think on your feet, assess problems and find solutions.
A good response to others is not something like I agree. Please .docxransayo
A good response to others is not something like "I agree." Please find something that you can analyze, add to, critique, explain, disagree with, or something. It should be a few cogent sentences. It should contain something that shows your knowledge of the subject, as well as additional materials you might bring from the web and elsewhere.
You should create substantial responses to your peers. Think of this as your opportunity to teach. Create substantial responses which expand on a point and present information on the topic. Your responses should demonstrate your critical thinking on the topic.
Respond to the following discussions (6X). Write how you would respond to their discussions with approximately 100 words or more each. Be thoughtful and insightful and it must demonstrate critical thinking and analysis.
How does scientific inquiry try to avoid the common pitfalls that produce error in nonscientific inquiry?
1.There are common pitfall errors involved when using nonscientific inquires because nonscientific inquiries do not follow the scientific method. The scientific method is used as a model of science. The scientific method is what scientists use to do research. The scientific method involves, "...three main elements in the traditional model of science, typically presented in the order in which they are implemented: theory, operationalization, and observation" (Babbie.) A theory is formed from scientists. This theory then goes into the operationalization stage. During the operationalization stage, the variables involved in the theory are specified. After operationalization comes the observation stage. During the observation stage, the theory is tested in real life. The observations are measured and then turned into a hypothesis that can be tested. With nonscientific inquiry, errors such as overgeneralization, inaccurate observations, and illogical reasoning may happen. Using scientific inquiry, and the scientific method, reduces these errors. Using scientific inquiry is needed to make any kind of scientific theory.
2. Nonscientific inquiry is basically the action of observation. It is done countless times a day by everyone whether they realize it or not. It is similar to the idea of assumptions without the backing of any scientific support. The book give the example of knowing is going to rain when the trick knee starts acting up. Is this real or a perceived notion that seems to coincide for an individual enough for them to believe it is true.
The scientific inquiry differs because it takes guess work out of the equation. It utilizes the processes of logic and observation as well as data collection and analysis (Babbie,2017).Utilizing these scientific tools to establish an outcome or understanding provides a more realistic and accurate account of what is being seen and done.
Scientific inquiry Is important in the efforts of avoiding bias and/or falsification of data as well as oversimplification or possible dishonesty whether.
Discussion QuestionWilliam Ford Jr., Chairman of Ford Motor C.docxedgar6wallace88877
Discussion Question:
William Ford Jr., Chairman of Ford Motor Co. said, "A good company delivers excellent products and services, and a great company does all that and strives to make the world a better place."
Supported by evidence from your textbook, the Starbucks case study, and other research, describes two forces that you believe shape the relationship between business and society. Provide two examples, one for each force you select. Be specific in your answer and discuss strengths and weaknesses via examples and applications. Be certain to cite in APA format all sources used. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ discussion posts.
MBA 525 - Module 4 AVP - Decision Making and Ethics
Slide 1
Title slide
Slide content:
MBA 525 Module 4
Slide 2
Slide title:
Decision Making and Ethics
Narrator:
In this presentation, we will discuss the decision making process and how it is informed by ethics. We will
highlight common errors in decision making, rationality, and ethical decision making.
Slide 3
Slide title:
Decision-Making Steps
Slide content:
• Define the task
• Delegate tasks
• Seek out information and determine its accuracy
• Establish criteria for evaluating specific courses of action
• Discover and evaluate alternative options
• Prepare and present the group’s choice persuasively to the target audience
Narrator:
There are six steps in the decision making process.
First, define the task.
Second, delegate tasks.
Third, seek out information and determine its accuracy.
Fourth, establish criteria for evaluating specific courses of action.
Fifth, discover and evaluate alternative options.
And lastly, prepare and present the group’s choice persuasively to the target audience.
Slide 4
Slide title:
Errors of Poor Decision Making
Slide content:
• Improper assessment of the situation
• The establishment of inappropriate goals and objectives
• Improper assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of various alternatives
• The establishment of a flawed information base
Narrator:
The most common errors in this process include:
Improper assessment of the situation,
The establishment of inappropriate goals and objectives,
Improper assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of various alternatives, and,
The establishment of a flawed information base.
Consider the last decision you made that was faulty. Reflect on which error in decision making was
present. We are all guilty of making the “wrong” decision at some point due to errors in judgment.
Slide 5
Slide title:
Steps of Rational Decision Making
Slide content:
• Recognize the problem
• Discuss the problem with all relevant persons
• Decide on alternative courses of action
• Choose an optimal solution and implement it
• Monitor the impact of the solution
Narrator:
The steps to rational decision making vary a bit from the general model. There are only five, not six steps.
First, recognize the problem. This is a different starting point. It is important to first understand the
problem.
Next, disc.
Foundational Models for Better ThinkingAaron Bazin
This is the example instructor material for the book, "Think: Tools to Build Your Mind." More information about the book and how to access the other instructor material is available at: https://think3062.wordpress.com/
Think: Tools to Build Your Mind Instructor SampleAaron Bazin
This book describes 190 different thinking models that that will help you think clearly in a world that is often complex, confusing, and continually changing. The book not only addresses each facet of thinking, it also covers overall critical thinking models that you can use to help improve your overall thinking performance.
Problems are obstacles thrown in front of us to hamper our progress.
These problems must be solved and overcome.
Problems can arise in personal, professional and social contexts.
Some problems can be solved alone, some can be by collective thought and some by using computers.
Problem solving refers to any activity or group of activities that seek to resolve problems or find a solution to solve the problems, by proceeding in an orderly fashion.
problem solving strategies examples
problem solving methods and techniques
problem solving techniques and strategies
math problem solving strategies
problem solving strategies psychology
strategies for decision making and problem solving
list of problem solving techniques
10 problem solving strategies
six thinking hats worksheet
six thinking hats ppt
six thinking hats scenarios
six thinking hats game
six thinking hats certification united states training
6 thinking hats printables
six thinking hats exercise
six thinking hats example
Steps in Problem Solving
Identification of Problems and Opportunities
Definition of Goals
Exploration of Possible Strategies
Anticipation of Outcomes and Action
Learning through Retrospection
Problem Solving through Six Thinking Hats
Advantages of Six Thinking Hats
Problem-Solving Strategies
Algorithms
Heuristics
Trial-and-Error
Insight
This slide goes over the different types of research methods used in Developmental Sciences and the Ethical considerations needed to conduct research in the field
Discussion QuestionWilliam Ford Jr., Chairman of Ford Motor C.docxedgar6wallace88877
Discussion Question:
William Ford Jr., Chairman of Ford Motor Co. said, "A good company delivers excellent products and services, and a great company does all that and strives to make the world a better place."
Supported by evidence from your textbook, the Starbucks case study, and other research, describes two forces that you believe shape the relationship between business and society. Provide two examples, one for each force you select. Be specific in your answer and discuss strengths and weaknesses via examples and applications. Be certain to cite in APA format all sources used. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ discussion posts.
MBA 525 - Module 4 AVP - Decision Making and Ethics
Slide 1
Title slide
Slide content:
MBA 525 Module 4
Slide 2
Slide title:
Decision Making and Ethics
Narrator:
In this presentation, we will discuss the decision making process and how it is informed by ethics. We will
highlight common errors in decision making, rationality, and ethical decision making.
Slide 3
Slide title:
Decision-Making Steps
Slide content:
• Define the task
• Delegate tasks
• Seek out information and determine its accuracy
• Establish criteria for evaluating specific courses of action
• Discover and evaluate alternative options
• Prepare and present the group’s choice persuasively to the target audience
Narrator:
There are six steps in the decision making process.
First, define the task.
Second, delegate tasks.
Third, seek out information and determine its accuracy.
Fourth, establish criteria for evaluating specific courses of action.
Fifth, discover and evaluate alternative options.
And lastly, prepare and present the group’s choice persuasively to the target audience.
Slide 4
Slide title:
Errors of Poor Decision Making
Slide content:
• Improper assessment of the situation
• The establishment of inappropriate goals and objectives
• Improper assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of various alternatives
• The establishment of a flawed information base
Narrator:
The most common errors in this process include:
Improper assessment of the situation,
The establishment of inappropriate goals and objectives,
Improper assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of various alternatives, and,
The establishment of a flawed information base.
Consider the last decision you made that was faulty. Reflect on which error in decision making was
present. We are all guilty of making the “wrong” decision at some point due to errors in judgment.
Slide 5
Slide title:
Steps of Rational Decision Making
Slide content:
• Recognize the problem
• Discuss the problem with all relevant persons
• Decide on alternative courses of action
• Choose an optimal solution and implement it
• Monitor the impact of the solution
Narrator:
The steps to rational decision making vary a bit from the general model. There are only five, not six steps.
First, recognize the problem. This is a different starting point. It is important to first understand the
problem.
Next, disc.
Foundational Models for Better ThinkingAaron Bazin
This is the example instructor material for the book, "Think: Tools to Build Your Mind." More information about the book and how to access the other instructor material is available at: https://think3062.wordpress.com/
Think: Tools to Build Your Mind Instructor SampleAaron Bazin
This book describes 190 different thinking models that that will help you think clearly in a world that is often complex, confusing, and continually changing. The book not only addresses each facet of thinking, it also covers overall critical thinking models that you can use to help improve your overall thinking performance.
Problems are obstacles thrown in front of us to hamper our progress.
These problems must be solved and overcome.
Problems can arise in personal, professional and social contexts.
Some problems can be solved alone, some can be by collective thought and some by using computers.
Problem solving refers to any activity or group of activities that seek to resolve problems or find a solution to solve the problems, by proceeding in an orderly fashion.
problem solving strategies examples
problem solving methods and techniques
problem solving techniques and strategies
math problem solving strategies
problem solving strategies psychology
strategies for decision making and problem solving
list of problem solving techniques
10 problem solving strategies
six thinking hats worksheet
six thinking hats ppt
six thinking hats scenarios
six thinking hats game
six thinking hats certification united states training
6 thinking hats printables
six thinking hats exercise
six thinking hats example
Steps in Problem Solving
Identification of Problems and Opportunities
Definition of Goals
Exploration of Possible Strategies
Anticipation of Outcomes and Action
Learning through Retrospection
Problem Solving through Six Thinking Hats
Advantages of Six Thinking Hats
Problem-Solving Strategies
Algorithms
Heuristics
Trial-and-Error
Insight
This slide goes over the different types of research methods used in Developmental Sciences and the Ethical considerations needed to conduct research in the field
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
2. Chapter 8 Overview: Big Questions
• What Is Thinking?
• How Do You Use Thinking?
• What Is Intelligence?
• How Is Intelligence Measured?
3. Chapter 8 Overview: Study Units
• 8.1 Thinking Is the Mental Manipulation of Representations
• 8.2 Schemas Are the Basis of Thinking
• 8.3 Schemas Are the Basis of Stereotypes
• 8.4 You Use Thinking in Three Ways
• 8.5 How You Think Biases Decision Making
• 8.6 You Solve Problems to Achieve Goals
• 8.7 You Overcome Obstacles to Solve Problems
• 8.8 One General Factor May Underlie Intelligence
• 8.9 There May Be Multiple Aspects of Intelligence
• 8.10 Intelligence Is a Result of Genes and Environment
• 8.11 Intelligence Is Assessed with Psychometric Tests
• 8.12 Intelligence Is Associated with Cognitive Performance
• 8.13 Many Factors Determine Group Differences in Intelligence
4. What Is Thinking?
8.1 Thinking Is the Mental Manipulation of Representations
8.2 Schemas Are the Basis of Thinking
8.3 Schemas Are the Basis of Stereotypes
5. 8.1 Thinking Is the Mental Manipulation of Representations (1)
Thinking: The mental manipulation of representations
of information we encounter in our environments.
• Cognitive psychologists study thought and the
understanding that results from thinking.
6. 8.1 Thinking Is the Mental Manipulation of Representations (1)
When you think of a “dog” what comes to mind?
• Is it an image of a 4 legged friendly creature?
• Do you hear barking?
• Does it have fur?
7. 8.1 Thinking Is the Mental Manipulation of Representations (2)
Analogical and symbolic
representations
• Analogical representations:
Mental representations that
have some of the physical
characteristics of objects.
• Symbolic representations:
Abstract mental
representations that consist
of words or ideas.
8. 8.1 Thinking Is the Mental Manipulation of Representations (3)
Mental maps
• Include a combination of
analogical and symbolic
representations
o Such shortcuts are useful,
but they can sometimes
lead to errors, because we
can represent only a
limited range of
knowledge.
9. 8.2 Schemas Are the Basis of Thinking (1)
Schemas allow categorization of
concepts.
• Schemas: Mental structures—
collections of ideas, prior
knowledge, and experiences—
that help organize information
and guide thought and behavior.
• Schemas are related to your
mental organization of analogical
and symbolic representations.
10. 8.2 Schemas Are the Basis of Thinking (2)
When we use a schema to group things based on
shared properties, we create a category.
Concept: A mental representation of objects, events, or
relations organized around common themes.
12. 8.2 Schemas Are the Basis of Thinking (4)
Model Ways of categorizing concepts Examples for the category of Sports
Prototype model • Concepts are organized in hierarchical
categories.
• The prototype is the concept that is the
most typical category member.
• Other concepts are categorized as
similar or different from the prototype
based on how many characteristics they
share with the prototype.
• In the category of Sports, the prototype
might be baseball.
• Characteristics of baseball might include
that the game uses a ball.
• Sports with shared characteristics
(basketball) are similar to the prototype.
• Sports with dissimilar characteristics
(surfing) are different from the
prototype
Exemplar model • Concepts are not organized
hierarchically.
• No single concept is the best member of
a category.
• All examples, or exemplars, of concepts
in a category equally represent the
category.
• The category of Sports is equally
represented by all exemplars in the
category (including baseball, basketball,
surfing, etc.).
Table 8.1
Models of Organizing Concepts into Categories
13. 8.2 Schemas Are the Basis of Thinking (5)
Prototype model of
categorization
• Prototype model: A
way of thinking about
concepts. Within each
category, there is a
best example—a
prototype—for that
category
14. 8.2 Schemas Are the Basis of Thinking (6)
Quick! What animal are you looking at?
15. 8.2 Schemas Are the Basis of Thinking (6)
Is it a dog or a sheep or a pig?
How does it match your
exemplar for each of these
animals?
16. 8.2 Schemas Are the Basis of Thinking (6)
Exemplar model of
categorization
• Exemplar model: A way of
thinking about concepts. All
concepts in a category are
examples (exemplars);
together, they form the
category
It is actually a Mangalitsa pig.
17. 8.3 Schemas Are the Basis of Stereotypes
Stereotypes
• Schemas that allow for easy, fast processing of
information about people, events, or groups, based
on their membership in particular groups
18. How Do You Use Thinking?
8.4 You Use Thinking in Three Ways
8.5 How You Think Biases Decision Making
8.6 You Solve Problems to Achieve Goals
8.7 You Overcome Obstacles to Solve Problems
19. 8.4 You Use Thinking in Three Ways (1)
Sometimes the terms reasoning, decision making, and
problem solving are used interchangeably, but they are
not really the same.
20. 8.4 You Use Thinking in Three Ways (2)
Reasoning
• Using information to determine if a conclusion is
valid or reasonable
o Informal reasoning: relying on opinions
o Formal reasoning: relying on logical and objective
methods
21. 8.4 You Use Thinking in Three Ways (3)
Decision making
• Attempting to select the best alternative among
several options
Problem solving
• Finding a way around an obstacle to reach a goal
22. 8.5 How You Think Biases Decision Making (1)
An algorithm is a systematic set of procedures
to follow when thinking and making a
decision.
• “Rule of thumb” decisions are generally
fine—they are good enough in our daily
lives.
23. 8.5 How You Think Biases Decision Making (2)
Heuristic
• A shortcut (rule of thumb or informal guideline)
used to reduce the amount of thinking that is
needed to make decisions
24. 8.5 How You Think Biases Decision Making (2)
Answer each of these question
• Which is more likely? Being killed by a
shark or being struck by lightning two
times?
• Which kind of death is more likely?
Tornado or asthma?
• Which is more common? Words that begin
with K or words that have K as the third
letter?
25. 8.5 How You Think Biases Decision Making (2)
Answer each of these question
• Which is more likely? Being killed by a
shark or being struck by lightning two
times?
• Which kind of death is more likely?
Tornado or asthma?
• Which is more common? Words that begin
with K or words that have K as the third
letter?
In all of these cases, the
latter is more likely!
You’ve just
demonstrated the
availability heuristic. We
base our answers on
how easily or readily
examples of each case
come to mind.
26. 8.5 How You Think Biases Decision Making (3)
The availability heuristic is the tendency to make a
decision based on information that comes most easily
to mind.
The representativeness heuristic is the tendency to
place people or objects in a category if they are similar
to the concept that is the prototype.
• Can lead to faulty reasoning if we fail to take other
information into account (e.g., the base rate).
Make sure to read the short article on the representativeness heuristic for an example
27. 8.5 How You Think Biases Decision Making (4)
Framing
• How information is presented
affects how that information is
perceived and influences
decisions.
28. 8.5 How You Think Biases Decision Making (5)
The paradox of choice
• When too many options are
available, especially when all
of them are attractive, we
experience conflict and
indecision.
o Maximizers try to make
the perfect choice.
o Satisficers seek to find a
“good enough” choice.
29. 8.6 You Solve Problems to Achieve Goals (1)
Stop! Go try solving the Tower of Hanoi
problem posted under activities!
Then go to the next slide
30. 8.6 You Solve Problems to Achieve Goals (1)
Subgoals
• In many cases, solving a
problem requires breaking the
task into subgoals.
o Reaching each subgoal will
result in achieving the main
goal of solving the problem.
31. 8.6 You Solve Problems to Achieve Goals (2)
Working backward
• Working backward can
be helpful when the
appropriate steps for
solving a problem are
not clear; it involves
proceeding from the goal
state to the initial state.
Analogy
• Finding an appropriate
analogy for a problem
can help achieve goals.
32. 8.6 You Solve Problems to Achieve Goals (3)
Insight
• Insight is the metaphorical
lightbulb that goes on in
your head when you
suddenly realize the
solution to a problem.
o Köhler’s experiment on
insight in chimpanzees
33. 8.6 You Solve Problems to Achieve Goals (4)
Strategy Characteristics Sample Problem Solution
Subgoals Identify the goal state and several
subgoals to be achieved.
You want to repair your car
muffler, but you dont have
enough money to pay for repairs.
To reach the goal of having
enough money for repairs, you
research the best price, cut
spending for a month, and work
more.
Working backward Begin from the goal state and
work backward to the current
state.
You want to graduate in 2 years,
but you arent sure what courses
you need to take.
You identify the credits needed to
graduate, then the credits needed
per term, then the credits needed
this term, and finally the classes
that provide the needed credits
for this term.
Analogy Identify a previously solved
problem that is similar to the
current problem.
You cook beef with broccoli, but
the broccoli ends up soggy.
You think about how, when you
put an iced coffee in your lunch
bag, your sandwich got damp.
Similarly, moisture from the beef
ruins the broccoli. Next time, you
cook the beef and broccoli
separately, then combine them.
Insight Take a break from actively
thinking about the problem, and
the answer may spontaneously
become apparent.
You have a hard time solving a
difficult calculus homework
problem.
You put the problem away. After a
while, the solution pops into your
mind, and you write the answer in
your homework.
Table 8.2
Problem Solving Strategies
34. 8.7 You Overcome Obstacles to Solve Problems (1)
Restructuring
• Thinking about a
problem in a new
way in order to solve
it
Overcoming mental sets
• Mental sets: A
tendency to
approach a problem
in the same way that
has worked in the
past, which may
make it harder to
solve.
35. 8.7 You Overcome Obstacles to Solve Problems (2)
Overcoming functional
fixedness
• Functional fixedness:
A tendency to think of
things based on their
usual functions, which
may make it harder to
solve a problem.