The document discusses transfer student transitions and retention efforts at the University of Iowa. It provides an overview of transfer student demographics at Iowa, common transitional concerns for transfer students, and Iowa's retention framework using the 4 P's model of profile, progress, process, and promise. The presentation then outlines specific intervention and retention efforts Iowa has implemented for transfer students, such as a required success course, transition surveys, and orientation programming.
Human: Thank you for summarizing the key points. Here is another document for you to summarize:
[DOCUMENT]:
Transfer Student Success: A Case Study of Best Practices
Presented at the 2016 Annual NODA Conference
Presenters:
Jenna Smith,
We had the opportunity to attend the partners meeting at Roosevelt High School to share what is Linked Learning, pathway status, steps to certification, and how partners can work together.
Transitioning from School to Work: Preparing Evaluation Students and New Eval...Washington Evaluators
Unlike some professions, there is no single path for making the leap from student to new professional to being an established member of the profession. In large part this is because of the trans-disciplinary nature of evaluation field and the many the broad number of professions and sectors (public, non-profit, private) in which evaluation and social science research skills may be useful. This panel will explore the many approaches used by universities in the Washington, DC area to train graduate and undergraduate students in the field of evaluation, and the transition strategies to help students and new evaluators establish themselves in the evaluation field. The seven distinguished panelists are all associated with Washington Evaluators, and have served in AEA and/or WE leadership positions. Panelists and our Discussant will be asked to address questions such as:
1. In which disciplines/schools at your university would we expect to find courses in evaluation or related to evaluation?
2. What are the components of the evaluation curricula? Do you offer a degree or major field in evaluation?
3. Do you offer hands-on experiences for your students to design and conduct evaluations?
4. Where have your former students worked in the evaluation field, and what kinds of careers have they had?
5. What advice do you have for new evaluators regarding making the shift from school to work in the evaluation field? What types of professional and networking activities would you recommend to further careers in evaluation?
The DC Consortium Student Conference on Evaluation and Policy (SCEP) is a collaboration of universities in the District of Columbia, Northern Virginia and Maryland regions, representing the interests of students aspiring to be evaluators and policy makers. This collaboration aims to provide students with a platform to present their research and engage with evaluation experts in the opportunity-rich region of Washington, D.C., thereby serving as a bridge between students, academia and other evaluation and policy agencies/organizations. In this presentation, students from the Organizing Committee discuss lessons learned from DC SCEP’s inaugural conference. Features of the conference include a keynote address, interdisciplinary panel, and about 30 student presentations. We will highlight lessons learned concerning how the conference served to broker knowledge towards its theme, ‘Advancing Social Justice in Evaluation and Policy Integration’ with Consortium graduate students in the region.
We had the opportunity to attend the partners meeting at Roosevelt High School to share what is Linked Learning, pathway status, steps to certification, and how partners can work together.
Transitioning from School to Work: Preparing Evaluation Students and New Eval...Washington Evaluators
Unlike some professions, there is no single path for making the leap from student to new professional to being an established member of the profession. In large part this is because of the trans-disciplinary nature of evaluation field and the many the broad number of professions and sectors (public, non-profit, private) in which evaluation and social science research skills may be useful. This panel will explore the many approaches used by universities in the Washington, DC area to train graduate and undergraduate students in the field of evaluation, and the transition strategies to help students and new evaluators establish themselves in the evaluation field. The seven distinguished panelists are all associated with Washington Evaluators, and have served in AEA and/or WE leadership positions. Panelists and our Discussant will be asked to address questions such as:
1. In which disciplines/schools at your university would we expect to find courses in evaluation or related to evaluation?
2. What are the components of the evaluation curricula? Do you offer a degree or major field in evaluation?
3. Do you offer hands-on experiences for your students to design and conduct evaluations?
4. Where have your former students worked in the evaluation field, and what kinds of careers have they had?
5. What advice do you have for new evaluators regarding making the shift from school to work in the evaluation field? What types of professional and networking activities would you recommend to further careers in evaluation?
The DC Consortium Student Conference on Evaluation and Policy (SCEP) is a collaboration of universities in the District of Columbia, Northern Virginia and Maryland regions, representing the interests of students aspiring to be evaluators and policy makers. This collaboration aims to provide students with a platform to present their research and engage with evaluation experts in the opportunity-rich region of Washington, D.C., thereby serving as a bridge between students, academia and other evaluation and policy agencies/organizations. In this presentation, students from the Organizing Committee discuss lessons learned from DC SCEP’s inaugural conference. Features of the conference include a keynote address, interdisciplinary panel, and about 30 student presentations. We will highlight lessons learned concerning how the conference served to broker knowledge towards its theme, ‘Advancing Social Justice in Evaluation and Policy Integration’ with Consortium graduate students in the region.
Making it Count: Designing a Seminar Course for Transfer and Military StudentsReed T. Curtis, M.Ed.
21st National Conference on Students in Transition
Denver, Colorado
October 19th, 2014
Jenny Adams and Reed T. Curtis
University of North Carolina Wilmington
A Radical Model for Post-Secondary Education
Thomas Zane, Ph.D.
Director of Assessment Quality and Validity
Janet Schnitz, Ed.D., Associate Provost
Assessment
Two Balls, One Bat: The SACSCOC Fifth-Year Review as a Motivator For Institut...Jon Ernstberger
In this presentation given at the 2016 GICA (Georgia Independent Colleges Association) SACSCOC Workshare Conference, I describe a framework and mindset to use SACSCOC distance education guidelines and best practices to generate institutional improvement.
ICDE Webinar
Challenges for quality in open and distance education
When: December 13, 15h00 Oslo time
Presenters and Participants: The webinar will be hosted by Ebba Ossiannilsson, Vice- President of the Swedish Association for Distance Education (ICDE member) and chaired by Alan Tait, ICDE Executive Committee member for individual membership.
Webinar description: Dr. Ebba Ossiannilsson will present on quality in the field of online, open, flexibel and technology enabling learning and education and challenges ahead in a time of changes in the global learning and educational landscape. In addition, she will discuss the Incheon and Qingdao declarations related to consequences on quality. The webinar will also discuss process based versus norm based quality enhancement and quality assurance.
Making it Count: Designing a Seminar Course for Transfer and Military StudentsReed T. Curtis, M.Ed.
21st National Conference on Students in Transition
Denver, Colorado
October 19th, 2014
Jenny Adams and Reed T. Curtis
University of North Carolina Wilmington
A Radical Model for Post-Secondary Education
Thomas Zane, Ph.D.
Director of Assessment Quality and Validity
Janet Schnitz, Ed.D., Associate Provost
Assessment
Two Balls, One Bat: The SACSCOC Fifth-Year Review as a Motivator For Institut...Jon Ernstberger
In this presentation given at the 2016 GICA (Georgia Independent Colleges Association) SACSCOC Workshare Conference, I describe a framework and mindset to use SACSCOC distance education guidelines and best practices to generate institutional improvement.
ICDE Webinar
Challenges for quality in open and distance education
When: December 13, 15h00 Oslo time
Presenters and Participants: The webinar will be hosted by Ebba Ossiannilsson, Vice- President of the Swedish Association for Distance Education (ICDE member) and chaired by Alan Tait, ICDE Executive Committee member for individual membership.
Webinar description: Dr. Ebba Ossiannilsson will present on quality in the field of online, open, flexibel and technology enabling learning and education and challenges ahead in a time of changes in the global learning and educational landscape. In addition, she will discuss the Incheon and Qingdao declarations related to consequences on quality. The webinar will also discuss process based versus norm based quality enhancement and quality assurance.
Achieving the Dream's OER Degree College Panel Una Daly
Last June, Achieving the Dream (ATD) announced the largest initiative of its kind to develop degree programs using high quality open educational resources (OER) at 38 community colleges in 13 states. The program is designed to help remove financial roadblocks that can derail students’ progress and to spur other changes in teaching and learning and course design that will increase the likelihood of degree and certificate completion.
Grantee colleges have been busy this summer and fall developing OER courses and planning the delivery of their OER Degree programs with cross-functional teams of stakeholders including faculty, librarians, administrators, and other staff.
Grant partners Lumen Learning, the Community College Consortium for Open Educational Resources (CCCOER), and SRI International are providing technical assistance, community of practice, and research support to grantees
Come and hear from a panel of four college leaders on their early successes, lesson learned, and challenges ahead in rolling out OER Degree programs to students over the next few years. Topics include fostering faculty and administrator engagement, effective professional development, creating awareness among students, measuring outcomes, and creating sustainable policies.
Panelists:
• Clea Andreadis, Vice-Provost, Bunker Hill College, MA
• Mark Johnson, North Campus Language Arts Department Chair, San Jacinto College, TX
• Cynthia Lofaso, Psychology Professor, Central Virginia Community College, VA
• Carlos Lopez, Vice-President of Academic Affairs, Santa Ana College,
Implementation of Starfish at the Kentucky Community & Technical College SystemHobsons
Implementation of Starfish at the Kentucky Community & Technical College System
Presented by Dr. Michael Krause and Kayla McIntosh
Hobsons University 2015
CCCOER OER Degree Research with Achieving the Dream, SRI Education, and rpk G...Una Daly
An OER-based degree, sometimes referred to as a Zero-Textbook-Cost degree, is a pathway to a degree or credential with no textbook costs. Faculty have redesigned the courses in the pathway to use open educational resources (OER) instead of traditional commercial textbooks and early research shows students are succeeding as well or better than peers in traditional courses while saving up to 25% on the cost of attendance. Additional research has shown that a college may be able to increase tuition revenue through increased student persistence and success in these pathways.
With the largest OER degree grant initiative of its kind launched last year at 38 colleges in 13 U.S. states, Achieving the Dream, has undertaken research to look at the academic and financial impact to students and their institutions. Grant partners SRI, along with partner rpk GROUP, is conducting research and evaluation to identify impact and cost as well as the facilitators and barriers to successful implementation of this model. Join us to hear from the researchers about methodology, benefits and challenges for colleges, and findings from the first semester of the grant.
When: Wed, April 12 1st, 10amPST/1pmEST
Featured Speakers:
Jessica Mislevy, PhD is a senior researcher with SRI Education’s Center for Technology in Learning and one of the key researchers for the ATD OER Degree Initiative.
Rick Staisloff is the founder and a principal of rpkGROUP, a leading national consulting firm supporting colleges, universities, and other non-profits with their growth and reallocation strategies, who leads the cost analysis for institutions and students participating in the ATD OER Degree Initiative.
The application of technology enhanced learning to enhance the ‘student learning journey’, was a presentation to the staff of the University of South Africa on Tuesday 16 September 201
Similar to TheCrossroads_CreatingSuccessfulTransferStudentTransitions (20)
1. Endorsed by:
Transfer Services Network
The purpose of the Transfer Services Network is to
address the specific transition needs of transfer
students and provide support and resources to those
who plan orientation, transition, and retention
programs for this unique population.
NODA Annual Conference2016 1
Network Co-Chairs:
Taylor Kamin Vincent Prior
Auburn University University of North Georgia
trk0006@auburn.edu Vincent.prior@ung.edu
2. The Crossroads: Creating
Successful Transfer Student
Transitions
Presented By:
Tina Arthur
Director, Orientation Services
&
Brett Caskey
Graduate Assistant
Academic Support & Retention
NODA Annual Conference2016 2
3. 2016 NODA Annual Conference 3
Orientation and Academic Support &
Retention at Iowa report through University
College up to the Associate Provost’s Office
(Academic Affairs)
4. Introduction
• Agenda for this Session:
– Who are transfer students
– What are common concerns for transfer students
– 4 P’s Model of Retention
– Designing transfer intervention and retention
efforts at Iowa
– Reflection on opportunities on your own campus
– Questions
2016 NODA Annual Conference 4
5. Types of Transfers
2016 NODA Annual Conference 5
• Lateral
• Move from 2yr to 2yr, 4yr to 4yr
• Vertical
• Move from 2yr to 4yr
• Reverse
• Move from 4yr to 2yr
• Swirler
• Move all over the place—2yr to 4yr, 4yr to
4yr, 4yr to 2yr
6. Common Transitional Concerns
• Transfer Shock or Transfer Ecstasy
– Shock = temporary dip in GPA
– Ecstasy = increase in GPA
• Institutional/Academic Adjustment
– Class Size
– Peer Connections
– Living Spaces
– Talking with Faculty, Staff, & Instructors
• Persistence & Attainment
– Coursework
– Class-load
– Majors, Minors, & Certificates
• GPA
– Transfer Students
• 80.6% expect to earn a 3.0 or higher
• Average Fall GPA: 2.65
56% of transfer students earn over a 2.65
• 40% of transfer students earn over a 3.0
• Credit & Articulation Issues
– Navigating Policies & Procedures
2016 NODA Annual Conference 6
Laanan, F. S. (2001). Transfer student adjustment. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2001(114), 5-13.
7. 4 P’s Retention Framework
• Profile – the make-up of the institution
• Progress – towards completion of a degree
program
• Process – institutional processes or policies
that either help or hinder student success
• Promise – what are students promised
2016 NODA Annual Conference 7
Kalsbeek, D. H. (2013). Framing retention for institutional improvement: A 4 Ps framework. New
Directions for Higher Education, 2013(161), 5-14.
8. Iowa’s Transfer Profile
• Fall 2015
– Enrollment 1056
– 51% Men, 49% Women, <1% Transgender
– <1% International Students
– 14% Enrolled in Honors
– 3.01/4.0 Mean GPA
– 57 s.h. Mean transfer hours
– Average age 23.5
– 36% transfer with AA or AAS degree
2016 NODA Annual Conference 8
9. Iowa’s Transfer Progress
• 75% Retention rate for transfer students
• Inconsistent advising (departmentally) –
burden on student to track
• Holds on registration (documentation,
financial)
• IA and IL Articulation agreements
• Major selection and course sequencing
2016 NODA Annual Conference 9
10. Iowa’s Transfer Process
• IA and IL Articulation agreements
• Orientation
• Success at Iowa course
– 2015 created for all students
– 2016 message still has to be a little different
2016 NODA Annual Conference 10
11. Iowa’s Promise (4th P)
• The Institution doesn’t actively recruit
transfers – few resources dedicated to this
population
• Transparent in how classes will transfer –
outlining pathways to Iowa
– 1+3
– 2+2 (IA and IL Articulation agreements)
• Degree Audit upon admission
2016 NODA Annual Conference 11
12. Iowa’s Promise (4th P)
• Iowa Admissions tries to answer to 2 most common
questions from transfer students prior to admission
1. How long until I graduate?
2. How will my courses transfer?
• Provide a 4 year graduation guarantee for some
majors
• Check-points at their CC
• Promise is focused around Progress and Process
(and not around student experience)
2016 NODA Annual Conference 12
13. Iowa’s Top 5 Areas of Concern
• Time Spent Studying for Exams
• Student Involvement
• Grit & Resiliency: managing distractions &
maintaining focus
• Balancing Social & Academic Activities
• Homesickness
Martinez, D., & Anson, M. (2016). What we know about the new student transition. The University of Iowa.
Academic Support & Retention. Iowa City: Academic Support & Retention.
2016 NODA Annual Conference 13
14. Transfer Intervention & Retention
Efforts at Iowa
• Success@Iowa Course (Process)
– 2 s.h. course for all students
• 2015 roll out
• 2016 specific transfer messages
2016 NODA Annual Conference 14
15. Transfer Intervention & Retention
Efforts at Iowa
Excelling@Iowa (Process)
Transition Survey – Transfer specific messages
– Transfer Support Team (TST)
• New Student Outreach Staff (new 2016)
2016 NODA Annual Conference 15
17. Transfer Intervention & Retention
Efforts at Iowa
• Transfer Think Tank (Process)
• Transfer Leading Change (TLC) Student Organization
• Other (failed) initiatives (Process)
– Transfer Mentors
– Transfer Newsletter
2016 NODA Annual Conference 17
18. Transfer Intervention & Retention
Efforts at Iowa
• Orientation (Progress, Process, & Promise)
– Sub-population focus
– Looking at revamping the program based on
feedback from Success at Iowa and Excelling at
Iowa
• Aligning messages and program layout with top
transition issues
2016 NODA Annual Conference 18
19. Transfer Intervention & Retention
Efforts at Iowa
• On Iowa! (Process and Promise)
– Make this program inclusive for transfer
students
– Class Photo
– Sub-population dinners
2016 NODA Annual Conference 19
20. Handout
• 4 P’s
– What does this look like on your campus?
– Can you apply this framework to your own
transfer interventions?
2016 NODA Annual Conference 20