The Theory And Social Control Theory

The Theory And Social Control Theory
Evolution of Travis Hirschi
Travis Hirschi is an American criminologist who is famous for developing the self–control
perspective on crime and social control perspective on juvenile delinquency. In his groundbreaking
work, Causes of Delinquency, he argued out that an explanation for delinquency can be achieved by
absence of social bonds. He also stated that delinquency could be prevented by social attachments,
acceptance of social norms, recognizing the moral validity of law and involvement in conventional
activities. In his other work with Michael R. Gottfredson, they defined crime as fraudulent or
forceful acts that are undertaken in order to achieve one's self–interest. They also argued that the
explanation for all crime can be given as a combination of low self–control and criminal
opportunity. While developing the perspective on delinquency and crime, Travis came up with two
theories named as the self–control theory and social control theory.
The social control theory is built upon existing concepts of social control. It is positioned midst
other sociological theories that are aimed at the role of familial and social bonds as constrictions on
offending. The assertion of Hirschi's social control theory is that ties to the school, family and other
aspects of society help diminishing an individual's propensity for divergent behavior. It is, therefore,
the proposition of the social control theory that occurrence of crime results when there is a weakness
or poor
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Social Penetration Theory Paper
Social Penetration Theory was one of the first steps in moving our relationship forward. It allowed
us to move from normalized communication to a more intimate form of communication. Essentially
taking our relationship from friend level and moving it to a mutual level of intimacy for each other.
Social Penetration Theory was conceptualized by Irwan Altman and Dalmas Taylor and illustrates a
theory as to the pattern of relationship development. According to Altman and Taylor, intimacy
involves more than physical intimacy; other dimensions of intimacy include intellectual and
emotional, and the extent to which a couple shares activities. (West & Tuner, 2014, p.181) Through
my relationship with my husband a progression from non–intimate to intimate

The Social Of Social Cognitive Theory
Abstract: The Social Cognitive Theory is perhaps the most comprehensive and complex learning
theories in the field of psychology. The theory attempts to explain how our social environment has a
great influence on our behaviors and actions. Albert Bandura is the most notable psychologist of the
Social Cognitive Theory. He has conducted intense research and experiments for over 50 years and
continually strives to improve the strengths and correct the limitations of the theory. The Social
Cognitive Theory is applied today in many behavioral and cognitive therapeutic settings. It is unique
from other learning theories because of the belief that self–efficacy, goals, and outcome
expectancies are likely to determine behavioral changes. Social Cognitive Theorists believe that we
have the power to change our environment because our environment is affected by our behavior.
Does the paper sound interesting after reading the abstract? The Social Cognitive Theory is a
psychological learning theory that attempts to explain the psychosocial functioning through the view
of self and society and how these two factors have a bidirectional influence. Social Cognitive
Theorists believe that individuals are reactive and shaped by environmental events. It is believed
that this causes us to be self–reflective and proactive in our nature. The Social Cognitive Theory
believes that abstract modeling and strategic observation leads to higher levels of learning. There are
five main constructs of

Theory Of Conformity And Social Control Theories Of Crime
Theory of conformity outlines the ideals that an individual will change values or behavior in order to
fit in with a group. When it comes to the social control theory of crime, this is a central concept in
understanding why people deviate from legal regulations. When looking at individuals without
dependable relationships, a committed presence within their community and an upbringing with
specific beliefs, it can be found that people are more likely to follow a life of crime if they do not
present the listed characteristics (Orcutt 2011:97). According to Travis Hirschi (1969) there are four,
more definitive, central elements that cause people to maintain social norms; "emotional attachment
to family", engagement with goals and future aspirations,

The Theory Of Social Control Theory
Introduction & History Socialization is the relationship people have to important social processes,
which includes education, family and peer relations (Siegel, 2015). Proper socialization leads to
conformity, while improper socialization leads to nonconformity. Both theories are traced from the
Sociological Criminology. Sociological Criminology was developed by Emile Durkheim in which
he thought crime had a relation to social and environmental factors. According to Siegel (2105),
"Durkheim thought that crime was normal because it is virtually impossible to imagine a society in
which criminal behavior is absent" (p.11). Social control is a sub theory of Social process theory.
Social process theory focuses its attention on ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Second is a commitment, meaning that a lack of commitment towards morels and social laws can
lead to deviant behavior. Third bond that must be made is involvement. Hirschi believed that an
individual who participated in positive activities would not have the time to commit criminal acts.
The fourth and final bond that must be made is belief. When a person does not live in an area that
holds the same values or when they believes the law is unfair, one tends to rebel and commit
criminal acts. All individuals are potential law violators but there are ways to help lessen that
potential. Individuals who are kept under control by relationships with friends, family, education and
employment can help lead to a happy and healthy lifestyle. The social control theory explains the
possibilities on preventing delinquency behavior. If young people have strong and positive
attachments towards parents, teachers and friends, it helps them experience a happier lifestyle
(Siegel, 2015). Love, care and respect youth hold for parents are quite strong, therefore they don't
want to hurt or disappoint their loved ones. The commitment to education, careers and family is also
important because they have too much to lose if they get involved in criminal behaviors. Being
involved in productive activities such as participating in after school programs can limit their time to
engage in bad

Social Bond Theory Essay
Social Bond Theory Kevin Pascual Sociology 100 10/25/12 Social Bond Theory In 1969, a man
named Travis Hirschi wrote and proposed something called the Social Control Theory. This theory
can be applied in numerous kinds of ways when trying to address and solved social problems
dealing with adolescents delinquent behavior. Before we can try to apply the Social Bond Theory,
we must first understand the components and definition of the theory. Once we have a firm grasp of
the theory, we can then look into our own lives and programs within our communities, to possibly
provide support to strengthen the validity of the Social Bond Theory. Travis Hirshi's Social Bond
Theory The Social ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
All the activities that the kids participate in are all mentored and taught by law enforcement officers
who all try to become good, stable, and respectable role models for the kids to follow and become
attached to. In addition to the mentoring, in the recreational sports that the kids participate in, they
develop attachments to their fellow teammates that they are playing with. Commitment is what the
kids eventually develop once they become regulars in the program. After they get involved in the
sports teams that compete in tournaments, they will feel a feeling of commitment to the team. So the
program prevents them or lowers the chances of them committing delinquent behavior because the
individuals don't want all their hard work of practicing to be all for nothing. Involvement is evident
in the P. A.L program through the many activities that they offer to the kids so that there is
something for everyone. The program offers things ranging from "arts & crafts, computer classes,
culinary arts, dances, field trips, gymnastics, jewelry making, tutoring and personal development; as
well as local, state and national tournaments in basketball, golf, karate, soccer and softball."
("Pasadena pal program," 2012) With all these activities available to the kids, it is no doubt that
some of the kids participate in more than one of

Social Exchange Theory
The Social Exchange Theory was created by researchers John W. Thibaut and Harold H. Kelley, was
an attempt to everyday interpersonal relationships. This theory, with backgrounds in sociology and
economics, appeals to so many because of it simple answers to human interaction and intentions.
The social exchange theory is very rational and considers humans to be rational in every thought
they make. It examines human behavior through costs and benefits of being in a particular
relationship. The theory states humans try to maximize their gain, but trying to do least possible in
return or work. Summary The Social Exchange Theory is about humans thinking rationally about
the relationships they are in or try to obtain with other people. The ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In particular, "traditional societies pursuit of private goals has a tendency to become accessory in
relation to the social interest since the community satisfies its members' necessary or economic
needs." (Zafirovski, 2003). This would constitute that People who live in traditional societies, where
social norms are rigid, will have hardly have any cost, reward, alternatives to satisfy their needs. On
the oppose end, individuals who come from societies were social norms are more free, will have
more abundant amount of act to play within the relational economy; Hence not every one social
world works the same way. An additional drawback that can be found within the social exchange
theory is the fact that the theory assumes that all human relationships are created, maintained and
ended based on our choices. This social ideology fails to take in account the circumstance in which
connections that we have with people are predetermined by ones life. An example of this limitation
can be seen within families structures. In life we do not have the choice to pick and choose what
type of family we want to have connection with, we are born into them. unlike, the average
relationship described by the theory, when cost are too high, we do not have the option pick and
choose a new mothers, fathers, sister and or brother. The currency in our families always stays the
same, no matter what we do our family will always be connected to us in some way. Real life

Social Control Theory And Social Learning Theory
There is always that moment in life where you make the choice to be good or bad, but we really
don't know why we make those choices. There is a point in life when you choose to be deviant.
Social control theory and social learning theory suggest what makes us do the deviant behavior and
what makes it different from one person to another. They both have to do with the world around us,
but have different views on how you portray yourself from that. Social control is how you interact
with society, and it suggest that if you are close to society you will have good behavior, but if your
ties are not strong you lash out getting involved in criminal or unwanted behavior. This can be due
to someone living in a bad environment and catching on to things that aren 't good. Hirschi 's social
bonding theory talks about some ways this affects our lives, and his four elements explain why.
Social learning on the other hand has to do with your friends, family, and people you are around
from this you learn how to behave yourself. From what you see is how you interpret life. If you
were to see someone do something and get a reward from it you would learn ohh I need to do that as
well. The same goes for when someone gets in trouble and gets punished you don't want that so you
don't do it. Another factor to determine how you act another big one would be how you get treated
by your family and how they react to what you do good or bad. With the social learning being how
you raised your child

The Theory Of Albert Bandura's Social Learning Theory
Albert Bandura is one of the most influential psychologist in history, best known for his famous
Bobo Doll Experiment. From this experiment, Bandura developed his Social Learning Theory, the
theory that we learn from one another through observation.
To prove his theory, Bandura used children to see if they would imitate a modal who showed
aggressive behavior toward a Bobo doll. The subjects were 36 boys and 36 girls from the Stanford
University's Nursery School aged between 3 and 6 years old. The models were two adults, male and
female. Aggressive behavior was shown to 24 children, non–aggressive behavior was shown to 24
children and 24 children served as the control group. For the first step of the experiment, a child and
a model were brought into a room containing toys. The child was escorted to a corner that had
potato prints and stickers while the model was escorted to a corner that had a tinker toy set, a mallet
and a 5–foot inflated Bobo doll. For subjects that were in the aggressive condition, the model began
aggressing toward the doll after a minute. The model performed distinct aggressive acts that
Bandura was looking for the child to imitate. The model laid the doll on its side, sat on it and
punched it repeatedly in the nose and then raised the doll, picked up the mallet and struck it on the
head. Following the mallet aggression, the model tossed the doll up in the air and kicked it around
the room. These aggressive acts were repeated three times, interspersed

Social Exchange Theory Essays
Social Exchange Theory 2
Application of:
The Social Exchange Theory
In everyday interactions people are always looking to have a positive experience among those with
whom they interact. According to the Social Exchange theory, with each interaction an individual
has with another, that individual attempts to maximize the positive outcomes and minimize the
negative. The purpose of this paper is to apply the Social Exchange theory to an authentic real life
situation to best illustrate the theory and the key concepts that it holds. In applying the social
exchange theory from demonstration, to application, to then explanation, a better understanding in
terms of the value of the theory will be shown, as well as the function that it ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
According to West and Turner this is critical to the Social Exchange Theory (182). The theory rests
on the notion that within the limits of the information that is available to them, people will calculate
the costs and rewards of a given situation and guide their behaviors accordingly West & Turner
182). Meaning that people are always calculating the rewards and costs for each situation they are
put into, and those rewards or costs determine the outcome of their decision–making.
Along with assumptions for the Social Exchange there is another factor that plays a key role.
Relating to the concept of cost and rewards is the comparison level or CL. "The comparison level is
a standard representing what people feel they should receive in the way of rewards and costs from a
particular relationship" (West & Turner 184). Therefore the individual weighs the pros and cons of
the relationship. If the cons are an
Social Exchange Theory 5
acceptable amount, then the relationship should very well stay the same. However, if the costs far
outweigh the rewards, then there is what is called a comparison level for alternatives (CLalt). As
stated by West and Turner, "this refers to the lowest level of relational rewards a person is willing to
accept given available rewards from alternative relationships of being alone" (185). Signifying that
the CLalt measures how people evaluate a relationship compared to the realistic alternatives

Cognitive Social Learning Theory
John Tabro
May 3, 2012
I have selected this theory primarily because I believe that a great majority of our learning during
the course of our entire lives is achieved by observation. Bandura's social cognitive theory is a
learning based on the ideas that people learn by watching what others do and that human thought
processes are central to understanding personality. While social cognition experts agree that there is
a fair amount of influence on development generated by learned behavior displayed in the
environment in which one grows up, they believe that the individual person is just as important in
determining moral development. People learn by observing others, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
While watching and observing children play, you can discover their interests. You can see more than
the children just having fun, but you may witness any strengths and/or weaknesses in personality,
learning or interactive abilities. By observing children I was able to learn their developmental level,
such as who the leader of the group was or what leaders were in competition to lead the play
session. Thus observing the children interact I could learn a lot about their respective personalities.
From my observation, the child that was obviously in charge of this group had either an older
sibling, relative or perhaps was mimicking what he saw on television by directing and giving
instruction to the other children who were playing with him. In the game of organized basketball
there is one leader on the court for each team. That leader is normally the point guard position. The
child may already possess the personality of being a leader, but he had to observe and learn the other
details he exuded by watching what he had seen in live action or by television.
I can personally relate to this theory the most because in retrospect I realize that a great deal of my
behavioral learning was developed through observation. I wouldn't consider where I grew up as a
child as being the "ghetto", but the area was rough, and I believe it is safe to say that there was a
"survival of the fittest" mentality. There was a certain assertive aggressiveness that I

Social Learning Theory And Albert Bandura's Social...
Albert Bandura's Social Learning Theory describes the process through which people acquire new
info, forms of behavior, or attitudes from others firsthand or vicariously. The likelihood of a
behavior presenting itself will rely on the amount of reinforcement it receives and the value that the
individual associates to it. While some behavior may be rewarded, others may produce unfavorable
responses. An individual will learn from the consequences of these actions and when a similar
situation arises, they will alter their behavior according to what was most successful in the past.
Through the Social Learning Theory, one can absorb new behaviors from others or one can form
attitudes toward something that can in turn influence behavior. The attitudes we acquire may
sometimes be implicit or explicit and depending on the strength of these attitudes and environmental
factors, behaviors may come about. If implicit attitudes are strong and an opposing explicit is weak,
the behavior will portray the implicit attitude unconsciously.
Prejudicial attitudes, in the implicit or explicit form, can be played out through discriminatory
behaviors, or negative behaviors directed toward members of a different social group. By observing
or listening to those around them, especially those who they relate to, people can attain attitudes or
behaviors towards other individuals or groups who they have never even associated with.
Besides discriminatory behaviors, the Social Learning Theory can also

Social Cognitive Theory And Social Involvement Theory
Involvement Theory
The involvement theory discusses the amount and level of energy, time, and participation spent
engaged in a particular activity (Lee, Lee & Yoo, 2004). Witmer and Singer (1998) defined
involvement as "a psychological state experienced as a consequence of focusing one's energy and
attention on a coherent set of stimuli or meaningfully related activities and events" (p. 226). The
involvement theory has been used in various disciplines including student involvement, product
involvement, and customer involvement. Rocha Flores et al. (2014) posited that the lack of security
awareness or knowledge among users is an indicator of a low level of information security
involvement. According to Safa et al. (2016) information security knowledge sharing, collaboration,
and experience represents the level of effort, participation and time that users engage in security
activities, hence they represent levels of involvement. Therefore this study will incorporate
knowledge sharing, collaboration, and experience as a measure of involvement to determine their
impact on users' technology threat avoidance motivation and further avoidance behavior.
Social Cognitive Theory The social cognitive theory (SCT), formerly known as the social learning
theory (Bandura, 1986) is widely used in the understanding of learning processes. SCT originated
from the areas of psychology and communication and has been used in understanding computer
behavior (Shillair et al., 2015; Cho, Lee, & Chung, 2010; Compeau & Higgins, 1995; Workman,
Bommer, & Straub, 2008; Yi & Im, 2004). SCT postulates that human behavior is a dynamic
relationship where cognitive factors and environmental influences interact with behavior factors
(Bandura, 1986, 1991, 1997). SCT assists in building confidence and self–efficacy, as users learn
through observation or vicarious experiences (Anderson & Agarwal, 2010; Bandura, 1991). This
learning experience is influence by the environmental factor, social norm.
Prior computer security related studies examine social influence as a predictor of user behavior
(Culnan & Williams, 2009; Hu, Dinev, Hart, Cooke, 2012; Lowry & Moody, 2015; Posey et al.,
2013 ; Vance et al., 2013). However, many of these studies

Social Bond Theory
Through the evolution of social bonds, individuals have always been under scrutiny to abide by a
list of rules in order to be successful in their community. This ideology is made evident in the book,
The Code of the Street, by Elijah Anderson. Anderson dissects and exposes the various issues
dealing with families in urban minority communities. These families are labeled as "street" and
"decent". The connotation of the term "code of the street" is a set of accepted and understood set of
rules in which "street" and "decent" families abide by in order to function in modern–day street
society. These regulatory rules are known as a "code" because this term is not blatantly stated, but
mutually understood by those living in these disadvantaged communities. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Aker's social learning theory is evident in Anderson's research in Code of the Street. Aker explains
that the social learning theory attributes learning criminal behavior through the engagement of peers.
This theory can be practical in understanding the "code of the streets" of minorities in urban
communities. Modern society has put a label on crime in that it is inappropriate and that people
should not participate in it. However, those in disadvantaged communities who abide by the code of
the street allow the denotation of crime to change in their attempts to survive in such conditions.
Anderson states, "Children growing up in these circumstances learn early in life that this [criminal
activities] is the way things are" (Anderson 134). This mindset is common to those in minority
urban communities that portray the code of the street in terms of crime in the eyes of the

The Theory Of The Social Learning Theory
The act of learning is an innate characteristic belonging to people across the globe. Learning can
take place in many different forms (reading, writing, speaking, listening, excellency in a particular
skill, etc.) and settings, generalizing from one content area to another. It also occurs at varying rates
across a diverse spectrum of populations and can be influenced by any number of factors including
personalities, perceived abilities, societal values and environment. Some individuals acquire
information best in formal settings, like the direct instruction or supports found in a classroom,
while others may benefit more from informal instruction, learning incidentally from their
surroundings. Throughout the course of history, there have been many perspectives regarding
education and the manner in which individuals learn best. I will primarily focus on the educational
perspective of the Social Learning Theory and briefly discuss its history as well as its prominent
figures, components, and implications in regard to language and literacy both inside and outside of
the classroom.
In 1954 Julian B. Rotter developed the Social Learning Theory that gravitated away from Freud's
psychoanalysis and Skinner's behaviorism that focused on behavior rather than intrinsic thought.
They were the most popular theories during that time, focusing on experimental methods,
emphasizing variables that are observable, measurable, and manipulatable, avoiding "whatever is
subjective, internal,

Social Concentration Theory Analysis
The social penetration theory asserts that as a relationship develops it can develop a person's
communication from superficial to deeply personal topics, and it can slowly penetrate the
communicators' public persona to reach their core personality or sense of self. A person can allow
others to penetrate their public self when they disclose personal information. The decision to
disclose is based on the perceived rewards the person will gain if he or she will disclose. Altman and
Dalmas used ideas from the social exchange theory to develop the idea of regulating closeness with
rewards and cost. The rewards must out weight the cost in any relationship. Altman and Dalmas
compare people to onions due to the deception of the multilayered structure of personality. The outer
layer is the public layer, and we peel back the layers to the deeper, more vulnerable, and private
thoughts, beliefs, and values. In order for these layers to be penetrated, one has to go through self–
disclosure. Self–disclosure is voluntary sharing that leads to reciprocity; reciprocity is the openness
in one person that leads to openness in others. Also, within self–disclosure is depth and breadth, the
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, there are major differences between their basic assumptions. Symbolic interactionism is
more of a sociological perspective on self and society; the central theme of the theory is that human
life is lived in the symbolic domain, but most importantly, we live through the notion of the
looking–glass self. In contrast, the social penetration theory focuses on how a relationship begins
between two people; as the relationship develops the interpersonal communication moves from
being shallow to a more intimate level. The symbolic interactionism theory and social penetration
theory have major differences within their basic assumptions and

Social Cognitive Theory, And Social Cognitive Theory
Social cognitive theory, also known as social learning theory, "a theory of learning that focuses on
changes in behaviour that result from observing others" (Bandura 2001 as cited in Eggen,Kauchak,
2013). According to Simons(1994, p.43) Social learning Theory is the view of psychologists who
emphasize that behaviour is learned through experiences with the environment and that cognitive
factors influence learning. Albert Bandura is the theorist behind this psychological theory.
According to a survey conducted in 2002, Bandura was ranked as the third most frequently cited
psychologist of all time (Eggen,Kauchak, 2010). Social Cognitive Theory emphasizes the roles of
beliefs, self–perceptions, and learner expectations (Eggen,Kauchak.2010). According to social
cognitive theorists learning is viewed as a change in a person's mental processes that stimulates the
capacity to demonstrate different behaviours (Hill, 2002 as cited in Eggen,Kauchak, 2010).
Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) continues to emphasize that learning occurs in a social context and
that much of what is learned is gained through observation. SCT has been applied broadly to such
diverse areas of human ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(Eggen, Kauchak, 2013). "A closely related assumption within the SCT is that people have an
agency or ability to influence their own behavior and the environment in a purposeful, goal–directed
fashion" (Bandura, 2001). In other words, it can be said that those influences take place in a two
directional and reciprocal fashion. Bandura created the Triadic reciprocal causation model which
can be used to explain how learning results from the interactions among three factors: (1) personal
and cognitive factors, (2) behavioural patterns and (3) social environment. Example of personal
factors are self control and

The Theory Of Social Learning Theory
This essay will demonstrate a knowledge and understanding and discuss the concept of social
learning theory, whilst taking into consideration and explaining the way children learn and develop.
This essay will focus on the overall concept of this theory and will explore the work of the theorist
Albert Bandura and how he contributes to the role of the adult and their understanding of social
learning. This essay will then examine the work of Urie Bronfenbrenner in relation to the work of
Bandura. Using this theoretical perspective it can benefit the adult by understanding of children's
learning and social development. Furthermore, this essay will link into practical and reflect upon
and analyse the relationship between theory and practice.
Social learning theory suggests that people learn from one another, this can be through observation,
imitation, media and modelling. This theory is often known as the behaviourist theory and cognitive
learning theory because it consists of using attention, memory, behaviour and motivation. "Social
learning theory advocates that individuals, especially children, imitate or copy modelled behaviour
from personally observing others, the environment and the mass media". (Gray and MacBlain,
2015). This is stating that a child will look up to someone they respect and class them as models, the
child may imitate their behaviour and the way they act. If a child's behaviour is then reinforced the
behaviour will occur again. This theory consists of

Social Control Theory Essay
In this essay, I will critically assess that deviant behaviour is likely, related to the strength of social
bonds. The Control Theory is the criminological theory, which is mostly driven by classicist beliefs,
similar in the freedom of choice, and the ability to stop ourselves from committing a crime. It is a
theory of why individual's do not commit the crime? (Hirschi,1969) The theory was popular in the
1950's/1960's, as this was a new way of thinking since other theorists were interested, why do
people commit a crime? and the control theory begins to explain the social controls/bonds to their
society, which can insulate an individual from deviance. As it is presumed the majority of people
would commit the crime if they had the chance. It ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(Newburn, 2012: p236).
Sykes and Matza's (1957) theory was that delinquents do not usually believe in delinquent
behaviour all the time, they conform most of the time and believe in community values. However,
when delinquent behaviour is apparent, offenders deny responsibility, by saying "something came
over me" (Sanderson, 1994: p94) Most delinquents grow out of their behaviour as they mature
(Vold, Bernard and Snipes, 2002: p 182)
Travis Hirschi 'social bond' theory (1969) theory insinuates that we all have the ability to commit the
crime, but the stronger social bonds we have with intuitions like school and family, the more
probable to conform. Hirschi recommended 4 categories of social control. Firstly, 'Attachment' this
is the strength of the ties with family and friends. "Lack of attachment is directly conductive to
delinquency because the unattached child does not have to consider the consequences of his actions
for his relations with his parents". (Hirschi, 1969: p98), which implies that individuals who are not
in a secure relationship with their parents are more likely to endeavour in delinquency. However, not
all unattached children break the law. Secondly, 'Commitment' this is how much of an individual's
time they are willing to invest in education. "Most, people simply by the process of living in an
organized society, acquire goods, reputations prospects that

The Theory Of Social Exchange Theory Essay
During the course of this week's discussion we will examine the social exchange theory (SET); Dr.
Cone did a great job presenting SET to us in this week's media, I hope you all enjoyed it. Now, we
can further consider it by applying the concepts to real life situations such as our family case study,
our own family, or other examples you find to be beneficial to you and our collective growth as
future APNs. In order to guide our discussion and to have a meaningful learning experience I would
encourage each of us to answer the following: What do you find most interesting among the
theoretical concepts? Provide a brief patient and family scenario that exemplifies a key concept from
the presentation. Discuss whether or not you agree with the ideas presented in this media
presentation.
Here are the basic premises of social exchange theory from the presentation:
1.Humans seek rewards and avoid punishment
2.Humans seek maximize profit for themselves while minimizing cost
3.Persons will weight benefits and costs in making decisions based on the information
4.Standards that humans use to evaluate rewards and cost differ individual to individual and may
change over time
5.The importance that humans attach to the behavior of other varies from person to person
6.The greater the value of a reward exceeds on expectations, the less valued the reward will become
in the future (the bigger is better phenomenon)
Additional concepts to consider are interdependence, experience, norms, attraction

Social Learning Theory And Social Theory
There are many theories in the field of criminology that seek to explain the reasons behind why
people commit crimes. Social process theory is one such theory and asserts that criminal behavior is
learned through interactions with others (Schmalleger, 2012). There are four types of social process
theories including: social learning theory, social control theory, labeling theory, and dramaturgical
perspective. This paper will explore two of the theories including social learning theory and social
control theory. The paper will discuss social process theory and the history of its development, the
theory's importance to criminology, examples of the theory, and any positives or negatives
associated with the theory.
Theory and the History of its Development
Social Learning Theory
Social Learning Theory is the process that occurs through observing the consequences of others and
by determining if such behavior is worth replicating (Wallace, n.d.) Basically this theory suggests
that humans learn by watching others. Social Learning Theory was developed in the 1930's by
Theorists, Edwin Sutherland, Robert Burgess, Ronald L. Akers, and Daniel Glaser. These theorists
developed the learning theory by recognizing patterns of criminal behaviors and the types of values
that went along with criminals, the way they lived and communicated which they called differential
association (Schmalleger, 2012.) Another theorist that has helped in the development of theory is
Albert Bandura. Bandura

Social Judgment Theory Essay
Abstract
The best theory to addresses how people's attitudes change as situations and involvement change is
social judgment theory. A review of the literature on social judgment theory (SJT) improves
understanding of one's own judgment process and of one's work, marital and interpersonal
relationship. The social judgment theory of attitude change was first presented by the U.S.–based
Turkish psychologist Muzafer Sherif (1906–88) and the U.S. psychologist Carl I(vor) Hovland
(1912–61) in Social Judgment (1961). SJT attempted to explain how attitude change is influenced
by judgmental processes. The focus of SJT was about attitude change on a specific issue that results
from judgments on related issues. This study provides insight literature ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
However, Carl Hovland died before completing the book Social Judgment in 1961, thus Sherif
carried on their study and published the book after Hovland's death (Sherif & Hovland, 1961).
Carolyn W. Sherif, Muzafer Sherif's wife, is one of primary theorist of social judgment theory
(Sherif et al., 1965). Carolyn W. Sherif and Muzafer integrated the social judgment–involvement
approach into the study of individual attitude and behavior within the patterned interaction of such
groups in Attitude and Attitude Change: The Social Judgment–Involvement Approach (1965), the
book in which the social judgment–involvement theory is detailed.
Fundamental Theoretical Ideas
The focus of SJT is that an attitude change on a specific issue will result from judgments on related
issues. Because we cannot observe a person's attitude using traditional research methods, therefore
the social judgment theory was developed (Sherif & Sherif, 1968). Based on Muzafer Sherif and
Carl Hovland's research (1961), they establish the ordered alternative questionnaire to measure the
judgments. The questionnaire requires that the participant rate a list of statements as being
acceptable, objectionable, or non–commitment (neither acceptable nor objectionable). An
individual's latitudes of acceptance, rejection, and non–commitment represent an individual's
feelings about the topics. According to Sherif et al.

Theories Of Relationship Theories Of Relationship [Document Title] [Document Title] Elizabeth
Wiwoloku Elizabeth Wiwoloku Introduction There are two main theories applied to relationships,
Social Exchange Theory and Equity Theory underpin commonly used behavioural therapies such as
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, Enhanced Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Integrative Cognitive
Behavioural Therapy. More recent studies in neuroscience and behavior and the importance of
language have led to the development of Relational Frame Theory and Acceptance and Commitment
Therapy as an alternative approach. In this essay I will outline the relationship models comparing
and contrasting them Social exchange theory Social exchange theory analyses ... Show more content
Simpson et al. found that participants in existing relationships rated people of the opposite sex as
less attractive than participants not in relationships. This suggests that people judge prospects of new
alternative relationships as less profitable if they are already in a committed relationship. The CLA
may provide an explanation as to why many women choose to stay in abusive relationships. If
investments in the relationship are high (e.g. children, financial security) & alternative
prospects are bleak (e.g. poverty, homelessness), then a woman may see staying in the abusive
relationship to be more profitable than leaving it. Blau (1977) argued that interactions are
"expensive", as they take time, energy and commitment and may involve unpleasant emotions and
experiences. Therefore what we get out of a relationship must exceed what goes in. Rusbult found
that costs and rewards from a relationship were weighed up in comparison to possible alternative
relationships when deciding whether they should be maintained which supports that social exchange
models idea that people assess rewards by making comparisons. Walster et al believed that social
interactions involve an exchange of rewards, like affection, information, status. The degree of
attraction or liking reflects how people evaluate the rewards they receive in relative to those given.
Costs of being in a relationship may be effort, money spent, time spent, or low self–esteem, whilst
the rewards may be pleasure,

The Theory Of Social Bonding Theory
The one single theory that can explain all types of criminals or crime, all the time, anywhere is
clearly Travis Hirschi's social bonding theory developed in 1969. In this theory Hirschi believes that
delinquent behavior is an example that results from weak social bonds. In most cases, crime is the
result that starts far before adult or even adolescent years. This is why there are four key elements to
social bonding theory that range from attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief. All of
these elements are key to the forming and reasoning of one's involvement in crime. Most people
grow up attached to a certain figure in their lives whether it be a close person throughout their
lifetime such as a neighbor, friend, family member, or in most cases a parent. As well as becoming
attached, most everyone is also involved in some form of commitment and involvement through out
their life. Commitment is one's commitment to society as involvement is the amount of time one is
consuming taking part in legitimate activities. The last element to social bonding theory, belief,
refers to a person's internalization of the laws or other social norms such as religious beliefs or what
they were raised as being considered "appropriate". The best true general theory of crime is based on
a person's social bond that include: attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief. The first
element and perhaps the most important of social bond, is attachment. According to Ryan, Testa,
Fuhua (2008),

Social Theories In The Breakfast Club
The 1985 comedy drama movie, The Breakfast Club, included five teenagers who are in Saturday
school detention for various reasons and at the end of the day must write an essay that explains how
they define themselves. In Saturday school detention, each teenager learns about one another, what
they have in common, and why they were assigned to be in detention. The teens all have similar
problems with stereotyping of how society and especially how their parents define them. In the
movie, four of the main characters: Claire, John, Andrew, and Allison experience at least one of the
following theories: strain theory, social learning theory, control theory, and labeling theory. Labeling
theory is the view that society creates deviance through a system of social control organizations that
label certain people as a delinquent or even juvenile delinquent. An example of someone being
highly labeled would be John Bender. John was the criminal student who smoked, skipped school,
and broke all the rules. John experienced labeling theory, ultimately by his dad as being a lazy free
loader and by the principal as being the worst kid at the school. To compare, he also went through
the strain theory stage, the stage when society puts peer pressure on an individual caused by the
failure to achieves one's social goals. John was labeled by his peers, father, and even principle as
someone who did not care about the rules in school or succeeding in life. However, he had his own
self–label where he accepted the fact that he was a trouble maker. Furthermore, an example in the
movie is when he felt he was treated unfairly by the principle so, to get revenge he would leave the
classroom and wandering the halls to make the teacher come find him and the students. With John
demonstrating being the bad influence on his classmates, he puts peer pressure on all the rest of the
students to display deviant behavior. Social control is when a person unites to society that prevents
them from violating rules therefore; if the bond weakens, they are free to commit delinquent acts.
Travis Hirschi, a sociologist, argued that the social bond a person maintains with society contains
the commitment to the pursuit of conventional activities, such as

Evaluation of Social Learning Theory
Evaluation of Social learning theory In this essay, I will try to evaluate Social learning theory as
originated by Albert Bandura. I am going to use three pieces of evidence, in a form of case studies,
which have been done previously to support or contradict Bandura's theory. I will demonstrate my
knowledge of these studies throughout their analysis, trying to highlight their strengths and
limitations. Albert Bandura, a 20th century American pszchologist, proposed a very important and
probably the most influential theory of development and learning. He believed that: "Most human
behaviour is learned observationally through modelling: from observing others, one forms an idea of
how new behaviours are performed, and on later occasions ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Another point, perhaps the weakest of the study, is methodological shortcomings. Inflated Bobo
doll, is primarily designed to be hit down and bounce back up, so basically its purpose is being hit,
therefore when the children hit the doll, it didn't necessarily mean that they were imitating their role
models. This contradictory argument is supported by Kniverton and Stephenson found in 1970. On
the other hand, bearing all these limitations in mind, "we can deduce that the role model did indeed
have a genuine effect on the child's observed reaction and imitation because all variables other than
the independent variable were well and tightly controlled." This finding is really useful, not purely
because it supports the theory of learning through observation, but mainly it demonstrates usefulness
of explaining real world situations, such as the influence of TV and actors on children (this is also
applicable to further development of social cognitive theory). Probably the biggest strength of this
theory is its high face validity. The idea that children would imitate other's behaviour is highly
probable, because we see it every day. But although there are some really strong supporting
arguments, that children actually imitate the behaviour, it

Explain the Social Learning Theory
Explain the Social Learning Theory, making reference to two relevant studies.
By Tanisha Sabhaney
Behaviouristic theories of learning are essentially theories of conditioning and emphasize the role of
reinforcement in learning. One of the mot predominant theories is Albert Bandura's social learning
theory, which assumes that. People learn through observing others' behavior, attitudes, and outcomes
of those behaviors which is called observational learning, that is an indirect form of learning known
as vicarious learning and indirect forms of reinforcement which is called vicarious reinforcement
.Bandura renamed SLT as social cognitive theory to accommodate the ever increasing importance in
his thinking of cognitive factors .SLT has also ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
An example of verbal aggression was, "Pow!" and "Sock him in the nose". After ten minutes the
experimenter entered and took the child to a new room which the child was told was another games
room. In stage two (Aggression Arousal) the child was subjected to 'mild aggression arousal'. The
child was taken to a room with relatively attractive toys. As soon as the child started to play with the
toys the experimenter told the child that these were the experimenter's very best toys and she had
decided to reserve them for the other children. In Stage three the next room contained some
aggressive toys and some non–aggressive toys. The non–aggressive toys included a tea set, crayons,
three bears and plastic farm animals. The aggressive toys included a mallet and peg board, dart guns,
and a 3 foot Bobo doll. The child was in the room for 20 minutes and their behavior was observed
and rated though a one–way mirror. Observations were made at 5–second intervals therefore giving
240 response units for each child. Other behaviors that didn't imitate that of the model were also
recorded e.g. punching the Bobo doll on the nose. Bandura thus observed children who observed the
aggressive models made far more imitative aggressive responses than those who were in the non–
aggressive or control groups. There was more partial and non–imitative aggression among those
children who has observed aggressive behavior, although the difference for non–imitative
aggression was small. The girls

Social Control Theory
Social Control Theory There are many things in today's society that unknowingly control our actions
and behaviors. Bonds that exist with our surroundings have a profound effect on how we live our
lives. Since the 1900's conformity has been the focus of every society here on Earth. If people are
given an idea about what is right or wrong and the outcomes for each decision are clearly shown; the
chance for deviance is greatly lessened. This summary will contain history of the social control
theory and how its ideas and beliefs have evolved today. The earliest known definition of the social
control theory was taken from E.A. Ross, a sociologist from the 1900's. He believed that the things
people believed in made them conform to their ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The things people choose to believe make them who they are. There are negative beliefs and
positive ones. Everyone has them, most are brought up to believe a certain way or practice a certain
type of religion. Families pass down beliefs and ways of life from generation to generation.
Different races believe in different things, many religious but others exist too. When people believe
in the system its government provides they give back to it, and respect it. However, what some
people believe in conflict with the beliefs of others, and when two different types of beliefs clash the
result can be ugly. The bond between people and their society lessen when they don't believe in what
it stands for. Demonstrators for abortion or war are perfect examples of the beliefs people have and
how they choose to express their emotions physically. The containment theory states that every
person has an exterior structure and a protected interior structure. Both of these different types of
structures are used as a buffer for delinquency. Examples of a person's exterior structure could be
belonging to a group of people, the opportunity to gain a certain type of status within society, or a
set of limitations or responsibilities. Internal construction can be capitalized on by having a general
positive outlook on life, believing in ones self, and a good conscience. When these different
constructs weaken in a person the chance for deviant acts increase

Social Learning Theory Paper
Albert Bandura is one of the most well–known figures of Psychology. Bandura provided theories
that gave insight on the fundamentals of human behavior and the mental process (Ortiz, 2015). He
has had and continues to have a large impact on personality theory and therapy. Bandura is
recognized for his unique behaviorist–like style that appeals to many individuals and practitioners.
Other theorists respect Bandura for his action orientated and problem solving characteristics that led
him to his contributes of social cognitive theory and the bobo doll experiment. Albert Bandura
continues to be identified to be a part of the most influential psychologists of all time and is
responsible to the education of many practitioners today.
Albert Bandura was born December 4, 1925 in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Social learning theory has already been begun to find its place in criminology. Various models and
tactics are being tested among criminals or individuals with deviant behavior. Within the field of
criminal justice there is always a task to try to understand the behaviors or intent of an individuals
and this is often achieved by understanding social learning factors. Social learning theory is growing
a place when it comes to government policies or agencies. This is because many times before an
agency, government funded program, or policy be implemented in regards to learning or education
social learning and purpose are vital. Educational programs and agencies before receiving
government funds need to provide explanation how models such as social learning will be used and
the results expected in addition to why there is a need. Klasen & Crombag (2013) explain that
examples are more evident with low income populations with high crime rates where social learning
interventions are needed to change

Social Learning Theory
For this assignment, I will be studying social learning theory. Social learning theory was first
proposed by Albert Bandura. It is a theory that "emphasizes the importance of observing and
modeling the behaviors, attitudes, and emotional reactions of others," ("Social Learning Theory,"
n.d.). There are three main hypotheses of social learning theory. First, the theory assumes that
people can learn by observing others (Cherry, n.d.). Second, social learning theory builds on
behaviorism by suggesting that intrinsic rewards can help a person learn or modify behavior.
However, observation alone does not lead to a change in behavior. There are four main steps
involved in whether the individual can learn based on observation. Those four steps include
attention, retention, reproduction, and motivation (Cherry, n.d.). Social learning theory implies that
cognitive processes (thought patterns) and environmental cues (the behavior of others that may be
modeled) are important for learning.
The assigned readings show that Bandura's original social learning theory was expanded on by other
researchers like Akers. Akers suggested that the "frequency, duration, intensity, and priority of the
different associations individuals have with others" also has a strong bearing on whether the
individual learns to change his or her behavior (Cochran, 2011, p. 795). In other words, a child is
more influenced by his or her parents because that child sees the parent often if not always
(frequency and

Criminology Theories And Social Bond Theory
Theories of Criminology Fall Term Paper: An Overview of Criminology Theories and Theorists
The theory of Travis Hirschi, which is the social bond theory focuses on the concept of the causes
and the acts of delinquency, which is what this theory is extracted from. This theory emerges when
an individual's bonds to the society and the community around them are weak or broken (Topak,
2017). The social bond theory can be described as the belief that socialization and personal
relationships are significant aspects of human development, which keep individuals from
committing crimes (Topak, 2017). The social bond theory is composed of four key components
which are the following: attachment, commitment, involvement, and beliefs (Topak, 2017). In ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This can then lead to individuals wanting to seek gratification, through crime (Topak, 2017). In this
essay, three theories will be compared and contrasted, which are Robert Merton's theory of crime,
Emile Durkheim's theory, and the classical criminal theory. These will be compared through the use
of the nature and characteristics of criminals, the causes of crimes in each of the theories, and the
policy suggestions, which aides to identify the similarities and differences between each theorists'
and their given theories.
First and foremost, Robert Merton's theory of crime is based upon the concepts of strain and
delinquency in individuals, especially individuals who are related to gangs and gang violence
(Topak, 2017). Merton states that the individuals that do partake in criminal activity are committing
these acts due to the communal strain placed upon them, in order to live up to expectations, achieve
goals, and gain respect and a status within the society (Topak, 2017). Also, there is an expectation to
be successful in politically reasonable and acquisitive goals (Topak, 2017). The characteristics and
behavior of a criminal in Merton's respective views would be an individual who possesses qualities
such as the following: an individual who results in choosing an alternative lifestyle that does not
conform to society's norms and alternative sets of values. An individual will adopt criminal activity
in order to obtain a comfortable

Essay On Social Cognitive Theory
Social Cognitive Theory Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) evolved from the Social Learning Theory
(SLT) in the sixties under the stewardship of Albert Bandura. However, it was in 1986 that the SCT
achieved full recognition. The theory argues that learning takes place in a social context with a
reciprocal and dynamic manner involving the environment, person, and behavior (LaMorte, 2016).
One main unique feature of the SCT is that it puts a lot of emphasis on social influence, as well as,
the social reinforcement at both internal and external levels. Not only does SCT put into
consideration the distinct manner in which human beings acquire and use behavior, but it also
considers the social environment people perform such behaviors. The theory ... Show more content
Another concept to SCT is the Behavioral Capability, which the individual's actual capabilities to
carry out a behavior through the essential skills and knowledge. According to the concept, an
individual is only able to perform a task if he or she knows what to do and how to do it. The
consequences of individuals' behavior help him or her to learn, which extends to also affect the
environment in which they leave. People learn from the consequences of their behavior, which also
affects the environment in which they live. The concept of Observational Learning asserts that
individuals are able to observe and witness a behavior from others, and then replicate the same
actions and it is exhibited through behavior "modeling" (LaMorte, 2016). Individuals are adaptive
and if they see a specific behavior in an individual, they are likely to embrace it. According to
LaMorte (2016), Reinforcements as a concept of the SCT are a reflection of both the external and
internal responses to an individual 's behavior, which affect the likelihood of continuity or
discontinuity of such a behavior. While the individual can initiate reinforcements or it can be
emulated from the prevailing environment, it can be either positive or negative. The construct
connects well the reciprocal relationship between the environment and behavior. On the other hand,
the Expectations concept is best used to describe the anticipated

The Social Bond Theory
In 1969, Travis Hirschi developed what is known as Social Bond Theory. Hirschi built on the work
of other social control theorists and was able to provide a better picture of what social bond is. In
Social Bond Theory there are four basic elements that make up social bonds. They are attachment,
involvement, commitment, and belief. It is these four bonds that all humans hold and ultimately
determine conformity or deviant behavior(Agnew, 1985). The four bonds are imperative in
determining a person's conformity or deviance to society. When bonds are weak, Hirschi saw that a
person becomes "free" to engage in delinquency (Williams & McShane, 2010). The first bond,
which is attachment, deals with the relationship one has with parents, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In essence, belief deals with and individual's conception of right and wrong and the belief that
society is generally fair in the rules it holds. Obeying the law and its authorities is a big part of
belief. The more an individual obeys and conforms to these laws and rules, the less likely they will
engage in deviant behavior. The weaker the belief system of and individual is, the more likely
deviance will occur. When looking at belief one can see that an individual has a common set of
values held by society. This would make it a consensus theory on the grounds that all of society has
a common set of values. When looking at these bonds researchers are clear that all these bonds
affect an individual and society. These bonds show that all individuals exhibit some bonding to
society and researchers are then concerned with how much bonds need to be weakened before
criminal behavior starts to take place. However, what is unclear to researchers is how the weakening
of one bond can affect the strength of the others. Another concern researchers have is what kind of
effects the varying degrees produce (Williams & McShane, 2010). In classifying Social Bond
Theory, the first point to identify is that it is representative of the Positivist School of thought. It has
a focus on human behavior and pathology and believes that rehabilitation through the increasing
influence of schools, family,

The Social Exchange Theory From The Perspective Of The...
Social Exchange
The social exchange theory is a theory that believes people form relationships depending on the
amount of rewards they may get out of it or what it may cost them to form and maintain these
relationships. My day viewing my social interactions from the perspective of the social exchange
theory began at 4:30 am when I was awoken by my best friend, Derry, telling me that she was
leaving my house. She had come over the night before to hang out, have a glass of wine, and to try
and get me out of my head. At 4:30 am, I got out of bed to lock the door behind her, when I noticed
that my bottle of wine was missing, and she had it in her hand. I was baffled that she would take my
wine without asking, as she has never done anything like this before. In this situation, she was
rewarded because she now had a $50 bottle of wine that she didn't pay for, and it came as a cost to
me. More than me losing a bottle of wine I had bought, I was now questioning why she would do
that. Our relationship is strong, and it is something that is worth fighting for, but I was still feeling
uneasy about the situation. I called her before going back to bed to ask her about it, she said that she
didn't think I would mind, and that I could come get it the next day if it was a problem. I took a loss
in this situation because I didn't want to retrieve the bottle from her and have tension between us, so
I decided to let her keep it. I analyzed the situation and realized that this was a

Essay on Social Control Theory vs. Social Learning Theory
Social Control Theory vs. Social Learning Theory
Abstract
Social control theory and social learning theory are two theories that suggest why deviant behavior
is chosen to be acted upon by some individuals and not others. Both take a different stance on the
issue. Social control theory suggests people's behavior is based on their bonds to society, if they
have strong bonds to society they conform and if not they have a tendency to act out or become
involved in criminal or deviant behavior. Social learning theory suggest that through vicarious
learning people learn from observing others and based on what the observe make the choice of
whether to copy those actions to obtain desired results or chose not to if ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
47–54). Also to achieve many of these goals it is very helpful not to participate in delinquent
behavior because it is looked upon negatively and could hinder the achievement of the goals.
The third element in Hirschi bond to society is involvement. Involvement in this theory is simply the
level of participation an individual actively pursues in conventional activities. Some of the activities
this could include are social events, sports teams, school clubs, religious organizations, family
events, or simply a job. These types of activities keep people busy and provide less time to
participate or get caught up in delinquent behavior. This is especially the case for adolescents as they
are highly influenced by peers who may not lead them to the best choices on how to spend their
time, which could lead to deviant behavior (Simons, Simons, & Wallace, 2004, p. 21).
The fourth and final element is belief (Simons, Simons, & Wallace, 2004, p. 21). Parents and
teachers can play an important role in children's lives by teaching them right from wrong, moral
issues, and the basic rules and laws of society. How the child comes to understand, accept, and
believe in these concepts will determine how he or she acts. If the child believes in these rules and
laws and accepts them he or she is more likely to follow the law and less likely to partake in
delinquent behavior, the opposite holds true if he or she does not believe in the rules or do not care
or fear the

Social Exchange Theory: The Basic Principles Of Social...
The main principle of social exchange theory (Blau, 1964) is built upon a quasi–economical model
and the basic elements of reinforcement psychology (Homans, 1961), where interactions can be
explained based on the rewards and the positive reinforcement they offer. Emerson (1976) explains
that when a particular action is rewarded, it is more likely that the person will repeat that action or
similar ones to achieve the reward. This is the main principle of Skinnerian reinforcement.
Social exchange theory acknowledges that not all human interactions are dependent on their
rewards, in fact, a lot of behaviors studied by this approach are mostly explained by reciprocity, but
in order to have a concrete and graphic perspective, interactions could be explained as a long ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This does not mean that unwritten contracts are less valid, on the contrary, if a company does not
know how to send realistic messages it will generate expectations in their employees that will
eventually work against them (Rousseau, 1999).
Contract Makers
Different actors can be establishers of the contract, since they are the drivers of the organizational
promise. We will now analyze who makes the promises in behalf of the organization. According to
Rousseau (1995), there can be principals and agents. Principals are basically the owners of an
organization making the contracts themselves. Agents are individuals acting in behalf of an
organization such as recruiters or managers. There can be four types of contracts established within
this actors:
Principal–to–principal: When the contract is established between the owner and the employer.
Agent–to–principal: An organization's representative such as the recruiter or the manager with the
employee.
Principal–to–agent: The employer agrees with a worker's representative, such as a union or in this
case, it could be an intermediate

Social Control And Bond Theory
Social control/bond theory was developed by Travis Hirschi in1969. The social control approach is
one of the three major sociological perspectives in understanding crime in our contemporary
criminology. The theory holds that individuals will break the law as a result of the breakdown of the
social bonds (Akers & Sellers, 2004, p. 16). Control theorists believe that an individual conformity
to societal social values and rules produced by socialization and maintained through social ties to
the people and institutions. The social bond may include family attachment, an individual
commitment to social norms or institutions like school, employment, churches and mosques. The
key elements of the social bonds theory are an attachment to other individuals in the society and the
desire to remain committed to following rules. In addition, an individual involvement in typical
social behaviours as well as one 's belief or the value systems a person ascribes. According to the
theory, crime and delinquency will result when a person bond to society is weak or lose (Demuth &
Brown, 2004, p.65). Moreover, as social bonds increase in strength, individual costs of crime
increases as well and this ultimately act as a barrier for committing a crime.
The real intellectual roots of social bond theory date back several centuries. However, much interest
among crime researchers began during the middle of the 20th century with significant work of
Travis Hirschi. After that,

The Social Control Theory Of Criminology
While most theories in criminology focus on the reasons and factors why people commit deviance,
the social control theory focuses on the reasons why people conform to what is excecpted from
society. The social control theory tends to revolve around questions such as why isn't everyone
motivated to commit acts of deviance as well as why individuals conform. The basic premise of the
social control theory is that criminality results when an individual's bond to society is weakened or
broken. There are four social bonds in the social control theory, which are attachment, committment,
belief and involvement. Travis Hirschi agrued that humans are like animals, they can be controlled
but can be governed by conditioned instincts. In other words, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This gave anybody the oppourtnity of walking up and becoming a new owner of a macbook and
iphone.
Last but not least, the third potential theft opportunity that I encountered was a wallet I found in SU.
A friend and I found a wallet by the student wellness center in Student Union. As an act of being
good samartians, we took it to the card office, the best place to take a missing wallet. Although I had
the tempation of opening the wallet to see who the person was or what was inside, I decided on
Attachment is the emotional bond, which can be described as the individual's sensitivity to and
interest in others. The reason why attachment is an observable factor is because people consider the
embarrassment of being gulity of the crime or being charged for the crime. They also take into
account how it might impact their relationships with their social groups such as family and friends.
Attachment revolves around how much loyality people have towards social insititutions and care
about the opinión of others. Social groups such as families and friends can impact the way people
conform towards not committing crimes. Furthermore, the conformity to norms, awareness of the
conscience, and the motives of the superego are what determine The more attached people are to
social groups, the less likely they will be deviant. During my three potential theft encounters, my
attachment

Social Control Theory Essay
The social control approach to understanding crime is one of the three major sociological
perspectives in contemporary criminology. Control theorists believe that conformity to the rules of
society is produced by socialization and maintained by ties to people and institutions– to family
members, friends, schools, and jobs. Put briefly, crime and delinquency result when the individual's
bond to society is weak or broken. As social bonds increase in strength, the costs of crime to the
individual increase as well.
The intellectual roots of social control theory reach back several centuries, but it was not until the
middle of the 20th century that this theory began to generate broad interest among crime
researchers. Since then, it has been ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It assumes further that a primary cost of crime is the disapproval of the people about whom the
potential offender cares. To the extent that the potential offender cares about no one, he or she is free
to commit the crime in question. Sociologists often explain conformity as the result of such
sensitivity. Psychologists as often explain deviation as the result of insensitivity to the concerns of
others. Together, they tell us that sensitivity is a continuum and that some people have more than
others and some have less than others. This is the position adopted by control theorists. They focus
on the extent to which people are sensitive to the opinion of others and predict that this variable will
predict rates of crime and delinquency.
Sensitivity suggests feeling or emotion, and this element of the social bond indeed attempts to
capture the emotions (or lack thereof) involved in conformity and deviance. The words are many:
affection, love, concern, care, and respect, to name only some. Social control theorists use
attachment as an abstract summary of these concepts.
The evidence is clear that family attachments are strongly correlated with (non)delinquency. In their
famous book Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency, Sheldon and Eleanor Glueck (1950) indicated that,
according to their research, affection of the father and the mother for the child were two of the best
five predictors of delinquency.

The Theory And Social Control Theory

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Angela Hays

More from Angela Hays (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Theory And Social Control Theory