クラウド・コンピューティング時代の生存戦略 ～ ホスティング・サービスがこの先生きのこるには ～ #osc11tk 1．クラウドコンピューティング 2. ホスティングサービスとは何だったのか 3. 次世代ホスティング。この先生きのこるために。

4. Cloud
Computing
Hosting Service

7. •
–
•
–
•
–
–

8. •
–
•
–
•
–
–

9. • クラウドは人生(ｷﾘｯ
–
•
•
•
–
•
•
–
•

10. •
–
•
–
•
–
•
–
•
–
•
–
•
•
•

12. •
–

13. Cloud

14. •
–
–
•

15. • May 1964
“ Barring unforeseen obstacles, an on-line interactive
computer service, provided commercially by an
information utility, may be as commonplace by 2000
AD as telephone service i today.”
l h i is d ”
The Computers of Tomorrow by Martin Greenberger
http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/unbound/flashbks/computer/greenbf.htm

16. Google先⽣⽈く、
G l 先⽣⽈く

17. 何かが違う…（；＾ω＾）
何かが違う （ ＾ ＾）

18. •
–
–
•
–

19. •
–
–
•
–

20. •
–
–
•
–

22. •
–
•
–
–

23. •
–
–
•
–
–
–
–

24. •
–
•
–
•
–
•
–
•
–

25. •
–
•
–
•
–
•
–
•
–

26. •

27. •

28. •
•
•
•
•

29. •
–
•
–
•
–

30. •
–
•
–
•
–

31. •
–
•
–
•
–

32. •
•
–
–
•
–
–
•

34. ガートナー | プレス・リリース | ガートナー、「先進テクノロジのハイプ・サイクル：2008年」を発表
http://www.gartner.co.jp/press/html/pr20080827‐01.html より引用

35. ガートナー | プレス・リリース | ガートナー、「先進テクノロジのハイプ・サイクル：2011年」を発表 市場を変革する可能性のあるテクノロジの成熟度を分析
http://www.gartner.co.jp/press/html/pr20110907‐01.html より引用

36. •
–
•
–
–
•
–
–
–

37. •
–
•
–
–
•
–
–
–

38. •
•
•
•
–

40. •

41. •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

42. •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

43. 78.0% 78.2%
75.3%
72.6% 73.0%
70.8%
66.0%
64.3%
57.8%
46.3%
37.1%
21.4%
13.4%
9.2%

44. 78.0% 78.2%
75.3%
72.6% 73.0%
70.8%
66.0%
64.3%
57.8%
46.3%
37.1%
21.4%
13.4%
9.2%

45. •
–
–
•
–
•
•
•
•
•

46. •
–
–
•
–
•
•
–
•
•

48. •
–
–
•
–
–

49. •
–
–
•
–
–

51. •
–
•

52. •
•

54. •
•

55. •
–
•
–
•
–

56. IaaS
• •
•
• •
•
• •
• •
• •

57. •

58. •
•
•

64. •
–
–
•
–
–
•
–
•
–

66. •
–
–
•
–
–
–

68. •
–
–
–
•
–
–

70. •
–
–
•
–
–
•
–
–

71. •
‐ 会員数10万人(2011年9)
‐ サイザックス株式会社
http://zzyzx.co.jp/

72. •
‐ 会員数10万人(2011年9)
‐ サイザックス株式会社
http://zzyzx.co.jp/

73. •
‐ 会員数10万人(2011年9)
‐ サイザックス株式会社
http://zzyzx.co.jp/

75. Throughput 463 287
463.287 MB/sec 1 clients 1 procs max_latency=3.968
max latency=3 968 ms
Throughput 789.003 MB/sec 2 clients 2 procs max_latency=4.765 ms
Throughput 1304.08 MB/sec 4 clients 4 procs max_latency=5.390 ms
Throughput 1939 43
1939.43 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=4.479
max latency=4 479 ms
Throughput 2534.71 MB/sec 16 clients 16 procs max_latency=12.107 ms
Throughput 2541.42 MB/sec 32 clients 32 procs max_latency=10.461 ms
Throughput 1877.46 MB/sec 64 clients 64 procs max_latency 16.700
max latency=16.700 ms
Throughput 1716.98 MB/sec 128 clients 128 procs max_latency=278.057 ms
Throughput 1727.13 MB/sec 256 clients 256 procs max_latency=301.766 ms
g p
Throughput 1517.07 MB/sec 512 clients 512
/ p
procs max_latency=376.031 ms
y
Throughput 1252.7 MB/sec 1024 clients 1024 procs max_latency=907.610 ms
Throughput 722.169 MB/sec 2048 clients 2048 procs max_latency=14085.365 ms
Throughput 730.51 MB/sec 4096 clients 4096 procs max_latency=26752.568 ms

76. [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4592 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput /fioa/tmp//clients/client6026 failed for handle 16385 (No such file latency=3 968 ms
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6026 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
[3] open 463 287 MB/sec
463.287 1 clients 1 procs max or directory)
max_latency=3.968
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6482 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput 789.003 MB/sec 2 clients 2 procs max_latency=4.765 ms
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client5040 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput 1304.08 MB/sec 4 clients 4 procs max_latency=5.390 ms
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6965 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput /fi /t 43 li t / li t5044 f clients dl 16385 (N
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client5044 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory) 479 ms
[3] 1939 // MB/sec
1939.43 8 il d f h 8 procs max latency=4
max_latency=4.479
h fil di t )
Throughput 2534.71 MB/sec 16 clients 16 procs max_latency=12.107 ms
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6055 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput 2541.42 MB/sec 32 clients 32 procs max_latency=10.461 ms
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4909 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
p p
Throughput 1877.46 MB/sec 64 clients ( max_latency y)
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6713 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
64 procs max latency=16.700 ms 16.700
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client5014 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput 1716.98 MB/sec 128 clients 128 procs max_latency=278.057 ms
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4971 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput 1727.13 MB/sec 256 clients 256 procs max_latency=301.766 ms
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6221 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput /fioa/tmp//clients/client5207 failed for handle 16385 (No such file latency=376.031 ms
[3] open 1517.07 MB/sec
g p / 512 clients 512 procs max_ or directory)
p y
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client5207 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput 1252.7 MB/sec 1024 clients 1024 procs max_latency=907.610 ms
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4139 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput 722.169 MB/sec 2048 clients 2048 procs max_latency=14085.365 ms
Throughput 730.51 MB/sec 4096 clients 4096 procs max_latency=26752.568 ms
# uptime
p
19:24:07 up 7 days, 5:46, 2 users, load average: 1543.52, 5862.79, 7304.55

77. [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4592 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput /fioa/tmp//clients/client6026 failed for handle 16385 (No such file latency=3 968 ms
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6026 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
[3] open 463 287 MB/sec
463.287 1 clients 1 procs max or directory)
max_latency=3.968
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6482 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput 789.003 MB/sec 2 clients 2 procs max_latency=4.765 ms
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client5040 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput 1304.08 MB/sec 4 clients 4 procs max_latency=5.390 ms
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6965 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput /fi /t 43 li t / li t5044 f clients dl 16385 (N
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client5044 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory) 479 ms
[3] 1939 // MB/sec
1939.43 8 il d f h 8 procs max latency=4
max_latency=4.479
h fil di t )
Throughput 2534.71 MB/sec 16 clients 16 procs max_latency=12.107 ms
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6055 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput 2541.42 MB/sec 32 clients 32 procs max_latency=10.461 ms
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4909 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
p p
Throughput 1877.46 MB/sec 64 clients ( max_latency y)
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6713 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
64 procs max latency=16.700 ms 16.700
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client5014 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput 1716.98 MB/sec 128 clients 128 procs max_latency=278.057 ms
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4971 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput 1727.13 MB/sec 256 clients 256 procs max_latency=301.766 ms
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6221 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput /fioa/tmp//clients/client5207 failed for handle 16385 (No such file latency=376.031 ms
[3] open 1517.07 MB/sec
g p / 512 clients 512 procs max_ or directory)
p y
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client5207 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput 1252.7 MB/sec 1024 clients 1024 procs max_latency=907.610 ms
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4139 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)
Throughput 722.169 MB/sec 2048 clients 2048 procs max_latency=14085.365 ms
Throughput 730.51 MB/sec 4096 clients 4096 procs max_latency=26752.568 ms
# uptime
p
19:24:07 up 7 days, 5:46, 2 users, load average: 1543.52, 5862.79, 7304.55

78. •
–
–
–
•
–
–
–
•
–
•
–

80. •
•
•
•
•

85. •

86. •
•
•
•

87. •
–
–
–
•
–
•
–
–
•
–

89. •
–
–
•
–
•
–
•
–
•
–
–

92. •
2010 11
2010.11 2011 03
2011.03 09 11 12
09 11 12 ?
2010 2011 2012
Service Released Log Storage (KVS) Analytics
L St (KVS)
HDD Master Store ( Hadoop relation? )
Image Sto rage (KVS)
Image Sto`rage (KVS)
Next Generation
Okuyama Memory Cache Function (KVS) Monitoring System
( RTIME )
( RTIME )

93. •
•

96. •
–
•
–
–
•
–
–

97. •
–
•
–
•
–

98. •
–
•
–
•
–

99. •
•
–
•
•
•
•
–
•

100. •
–
–
–
•
•
•

101. •
–
•
–
–
–
•
•
•

102. •

103. •
–
•
–
•

106. •
•
•

108. •
•
•
•

109. •
•
–
–
•
•
•

110. •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•