The strengths of the Indian Parliamentary System of governanace: 1.Smooth functioning of the government through the legislature and administration when the party enjoys majority in the Parliament. 2. Decision making is quick - Majority of the ruling party in the Parliament facilitates speedy decision making and implementation of policies. 3. Flexible system - can quickly adapt to changing situations. During grave situations the leadership can be changed without harassment like during the \"emergency\" period. 4. Transparent Administration - Executive remains ever vigilant to secure its future electoral prospects and the Parliament controls the executive through the requirement of the party have the confidence of the house and through the financial powers vested in the Parliament.This controls the executive from misuse of power and funds. 5. A nation with so many varied groups get an opportunity for representation. 6. The executive and legislature are not totally separated and thus while the executive wing has the freedom to act on policies and yet it is accountable to the Parliament for its actions. Disadvantages: 1. Absolute majority in the Parliament brings about a tendency of the ruling party to be dictatorial and engenders the possibilities of corruption. 2. Politicization of the administration as decision making takes into account the political ramifications more than the merits of the decision. 3. Unsuitable for multi-party system as coalition governments bring about logjams and much delayed decision making in the Parliament. The bureaucracy too lacks direction and leadership in those times and the policy making and implemntation thereof \'crawls\' during such periods. 4. Unsuitable for managing crisis situations rapidly as the PM and his Council of Ministers have the political ramifications weighing over them more so than the criticality of the situation that they have to respond to. The above is from data from the Net and personal experience. Solution The strengths of the Indian Parliamentary System of governanace: 1.Smooth functioning of the government through the legislature and administration when the party enjoys majority in the Parliament. 2. Decision making is quick - Majority of the ruling party in the Parliament facilitates speedy decision making and implementation of policies. 3. Flexible system - can quickly adapt to changing situations. During grave situations the leadership can be changed without harassment like during the \"emergency\" period. 4. Transparent Administration - Executive remains ever vigilant to secure its future electoral prospects and the Parliament controls the executive through the requirement of the party have the confidence of the house and through the financial powers vested in the Parliament.This controls the executive from misuse of power and funds. 5. A nation with so many varied groups get an opportunity for representation. 6. The executive and legislature are not totally separated and thus while .

1. The strengths of the Indian Parliamentary System of governanace:
1.Smooth functioning of the government through the legislature and administration when the
party enjoys majority in the Parliament.
2. Decision making is quick - Majority of the ruling party in the Parliament facilitates speedy
decision making and implementation of policies.
3. Flexible system - can quickly adapt to changing situations. During grave situations the
leadership can be changed without harassment like during the "emergency" period.
4. Transparent Administration - Executive remains ever vigilant to secure its future electoral
prospects and the Parliament controls the executive through the requirement of the party have the
confidence of the house and through the financial powers vested in the Parliament.This controls
the executive from misuse of power and funds.
5. A nation with so many varied groups get an opportunity for representation.
6. The executive and legislature are not totally separated and thus while the executive wing has
the freedom to act on policies and yet it is accountable to the Parliament for its actions.
Disadvantages:
1. Absolute majority in the Parliament brings about a tendency of the ruling party to be
dictatorial and engenders the possibilities of corruption.
2. Politicization of the administration as decision making takes into account the political
ramifications more than the merits of the decision.
3. Unsuitable for multi-party system as coalition governments bring about logjams and much
delayed decision making in the Parliament. The bureaucracy too lacks direction and leadership in
those times and the policy making and implemntation thereof 'crawls' during such periods.
4. Unsuitable for managing crisis situations rapidly as the PM and his Council of Ministers have
the political ramifications weighing over them more so than the criticality of the situation that
they have to respond to.
The above is from data from the Net and personal experience.
Solution
The strengths of the Indian Parliamentary System of governanace:
1.Smooth functioning of the government through the legislature and administration when the
party enjoys majority in the Parliament.
2. Decision making is quick - Majority of the ruling party in the Parliament facilitates speedy
decision making and implementation of policies.
3. Flexible system - can quickly adapt to changing situations. During grave situations the

2. leadership can be changed without harassment like during the "emergency" period.
4. Transparent Administration - Executive remains ever vigilant to secure its future electoral
prospects and the Parliament controls the executive through the requirement of the party have the
confidence of the house and through the financial powers vested in the Parliament.This controls
the executive from misuse of power and funds.
5. A nation with so many varied groups get an opportunity for representation.
6. The executive and legislature are not totally separated and thus while the executive wing has
the freedom to act on policies and yet it is accountable to the Parliament for its actions.
Disadvantages:
1. Absolute majority in the Parliament brings about a tendency of the ruling party to be
dictatorial and engenders the possibilities of corruption.
2. Politicization of the administration as decision making takes into account the political
ramifications more than the merits of the decision.
3. Unsuitable for multi-party system as coalition governments bring about logjams and much
delayed decision making in the Parliament. The bureaucracy too lacks direction and leadership in
those times and the policy making and implemntation thereof 'crawls' during such periods.
4. Unsuitable for managing crisis situations rapidly as the PM and his Council of Ministers have
the political ramifications weighing over them more so than the criticality of the situation that
they have to respond to.
The above is from data from the Net and personal experience.