Download slides at:
                                              http://slidesha.re/IFTPXk




       The State and Future of
    Learning Management Systems
    Southern California Technology in Education Conference
                         17 April 2012


 Panelists: Devlin Dailey, Instructure; Warren Ashley, EdD, Reza
Boroon, CSUDH; Jeff Borden, Pearson; Barry Dahl, Desire2Learn;
                    Jim Hermens, Blackboard
  Moderated by: John Whitmer, CSU Office of the Chancellor &
                             CSU Chico
Agenda
1. LMS Adoption – Nationally & in Cal State
2. Panel Discussion
STATE OF THE LMS
FROM AN ADOPTION
PERSPECTIVE
High Institutional Adoption
 93% of higher education institutions have a
  standard LMS deployed (Green, 2010)
Making Gains in Adoption & Deployment




                   Source: Smith, S. D., & Caruson, J. B. (2010). The ECAR Study
                   of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2010
                   (Vol. Research Study, Vol. 6). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center
                   for Applied Research.
But not there yet …




             Source: Dahlstrom, E., de Boor, T., Grunwald, P., & Vockley, M. (2011). The ECAR
             National Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2011.
             Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
Historical Trend: CSU Campus Enterprise LMS Licenses
                     20               LMS Licensing Trend
                     18
                     16
                     14
Number of Campuses




                     12
                     10
                                                                                 D2L
                      8
                                                                                 Moodle
                      6                                                          WebCT/Bb Learn

                      4
                      2
                      0
                          2009-2010      2010-2011       2011-2012       2012-2013
Historical Trend:
                           CSU FTES per Enterprise LMS License
           350000

           300000

           250000
CSU FTES




           200000
                                                                         D2L
           150000                                                        Moodle
                                                                         WebCT/Bb Learn
           100000

            50000

                0
                    2009-2010   2010-2011        2011-2012   2012-2013
                                       Academic Year
CSU Course Sections using Moodle
    *Cal Poly SLO                                               187


        *Fullerton                                              892


      *Stanislaus                                                15                                            0


CSU Monterey Bay                              553                                           614


  CSU Northridge                       2,492                                         3,687

                                                                                                                   Sum of Active
 CSU San Marcos                           1,098                                         1,162                      Course Shells


        Humboldt                      2,270                                         3,911
                                                                                                                   Sum of Inactive
                                                                                                                   Course Shells
         Maritime         64                                          811


         SF State                2,997                                        7,064


    Sonoma State                671                                         2,191


                     0%        10%     20%          30%   40%   50%         60%      70%          80%   90%   100%             9

                                               * Campuses in transition or piloting Moodle
CSU Students using Moodle in 1+ Sections

        SF State                                31,607                        1,435




                                                                                      Sum of Students using
                                                                                      LMS in at least one
                                                                                      Section



CSU Monterey Bay                            5,074                             503     Sum of Students not
                                                                                      using LMS




                   0%   10%   20%   30%   40%     50%    60%   70%   80%   90% 100%




                                                                                                            10
PANEL QUESTIONS
1. WHAT IS THE GREATEST
CONTRIBUTION THE LMS HAS
MADE TO TEACHING AND
LEARNING IN HIGHER
EDUCATION?
2. WHAT IS A “NEXT
GENERATION” LMS? WHAT
PROBLEMS DOES IT SOLVE, OR
NEW CAPABILITIES DOES IT
BRING?
3. WHAT IS THE ROLE OF SOCIAL
MEDIA IN THE FUTURE OF THE
LMS?
4. WHAT FUTURE TECHNICAL /
FUNCTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
WILL HAVE THE GREATEST
IMPACT ON THE LMS? (E.G. BLTI,
MOBILE, TABLETS, ANALYTICS)
5. WHAT DOES BLACKBOARD’S
ENTRY INTO OPEN SOURCE
MEAN FOR BLACKBOARD? FOR
THE GREATER ACADEMIC
TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE?
6. WHY IS LMS REPORTING (LET
ALONE ANALYTICS) SO
IMMATURE? HOW CAN WE FIX
IT?
Q&A and Contact Info
Contact Info:
• John Whitmer (jwhitmer@csuchico.edu)




                    Download slides at:
                    http://slidesha.re/IFTPXk
                                                18

The State and Future of Learning Management Systems Panel Presentation

  • 1.
    Download slides at: http://slidesha.re/IFTPXk The State and Future of Learning Management Systems Southern California Technology in Education Conference 17 April 2012 Panelists: Devlin Dailey, Instructure; Warren Ashley, EdD, Reza Boroon, CSUDH; Jeff Borden, Pearson; Barry Dahl, Desire2Learn; Jim Hermens, Blackboard Moderated by: John Whitmer, CSU Office of the Chancellor & CSU Chico
  • 2.
    Agenda 1. LMS Adoption– Nationally & in Cal State 2. Panel Discussion
  • 3.
    STATE OF THELMS FROM AN ADOPTION PERSPECTIVE
  • 4.
    High Institutional Adoption 93% of higher education institutions have a standard LMS deployed (Green, 2010)
  • 5.
    Making Gains inAdoption & Deployment Source: Smith, S. D., & Caruson, J. B. (2010). The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2010 (Vol. Research Study, Vol. 6). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
  • 6.
    But not thereyet … Source: Dahlstrom, E., de Boor, T., Grunwald, P., & Vockley, M. (2011). The ECAR National Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2011. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
  • 7.
    Historical Trend: CSUCampus Enterprise LMS Licenses 20 LMS Licensing Trend 18 16 14 Number of Campuses 12 10 D2L 8 Moodle 6 WebCT/Bb Learn 4 2 0 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
  • 8.
    Historical Trend: CSU FTES per Enterprise LMS License 350000 300000 250000 CSU FTES 200000 D2L 150000 Moodle WebCT/Bb Learn 100000 50000 0 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Academic Year
  • 9.
    CSU Course Sectionsusing Moodle *Cal Poly SLO 187 *Fullerton 892 *Stanislaus 15 0 CSU Monterey Bay 553 614 CSU Northridge 2,492 3,687 Sum of Active CSU San Marcos 1,098 1,162 Course Shells Humboldt 2,270 3,911 Sum of Inactive Course Shells Maritime 64 811 SF State 2,997 7,064 Sonoma State 671 2,191 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 9 * Campuses in transition or piloting Moodle
  • 10.
    CSU Students usingMoodle in 1+ Sections SF State 31,607 1,435 Sum of Students using LMS in at least one Section CSU Monterey Bay 5,074 503 Sum of Students not using LMS 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 10
  • 11.
  • 12.
    1. WHAT ISTHE GREATEST CONTRIBUTION THE LMS HAS MADE TO TEACHING AND LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION?
  • 13.
    2. WHAT ISA “NEXT GENERATION” LMS? WHAT PROBLEMS DOES IT SOLVE, OR NEW CAPABILITIES DOES IT BRING?
  • 14.
    3. WHAT ISTHE ROLE OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE FUTURE OF THE LMS?
  • 15.
    4. WHAT FUTURETECHNICAL / FUNCTIONAL DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE THE GREATEST IMPACT ON THE LMS? (E.G. BLTI, MOBILE, TABLETS, ANALYTICS)
  • 16.
    5. WHAT DOESBLACKBOARD’S ENTRY INTO OPEN SOURCE MEAN FOR BLACKBOARD? FOR THE GREATER ACADEMIC TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE?
  • 17.
    6. WHY ISLMS REPORTING (LET ALONE ANALYTICS) SO IMMATURE? HOW CAN WE FIX IT?
  • 18.
    Q&A and ContactInfo Contact Info: • John Whitmer (jwhitmer@csuchico.edu) Download slides at: http://slidesha.re/IFTPXk 18