The document summarizes research supporting the SCERTS model, an intervention framework for children with autism spectrum disorders. It describes the SCERTS model as being based on developmental frameworks and evidence-based practices. Research supporting the model is categorized into four levels of evidence, from experimental group studies to descriptive research. Tables list references for each evidence level and how they relate to the three domains (social communication, emotional regulation, transactional support) and components of the SCERTS model.
This critical review was the result of reviewing 300+ articles and selecting the most rigorous studies to conduct review of Infant Massage for the Preliminary requirements into Doctoral Candidacy. This results in 33 articles, representing 13 countries, in a variety of settings.
Summary of Research Supporting the SCERTSĀ® ModelMedical Net Srl
Ā
An interesting document with references on the use and results of the SCERTS model.
The SCERTS model is
based on a developmental framework and has incorporated evidence-based practices from the
recommendations of the National Research Council (NRC, 2001) based on its review of
educational treatments for children with ASD and more current research.
This critical review was the result of reviewing 300+ articles and selecting the most rigorous studies to conduct review of Infant Massage for the Preliminary requirements into Doctoral Candidacy. This results in 33 articles, representing 13 countries, in a variety of settings.
Summary of Research Supporting the SCERTSĀ® ModelMedical Net Srl
Ā
An interesting document with references on the use and results of the SCERTS model.
The SCERTS model is
based on a developmental framework and has incorporated evidence-based practices from the
recommendations of the National Research Council (NRC, 2001) based on its review of
educational treatments for children with ASD and more current research.
1 Clinical Problem Social Anxiety is described by .docxcroftsshanon
Ā
1
Clinical Problem
Social Anxiety is described by The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American
Psychiatric Association (DSM-5) as a persistent fear of social situations where the person is
exposed to people or to possible scrutiny by others and fears that he/she will display
symptoms of anxiety or be perceived in a way that will be embarrassing and humiliating
(American Psychiatric Association, 2013). This topic was chosen as according to Kessler et
al. (2012) social anxiety is among the most common anxiety disorder affecting 13% of
individuals at some stage in their lives. From experience, and according to Krysta et al.
(2015) medication is the first line treatment for anxiety disorders due to accessibility.
Unfortunately, for people experiencing social anxiety most medications have adverse effects
such as increased agitation and sexual dysfunction (Rosen et al 1999) and some medication,
in particular benzodiazepines are highly addictive (Lader and Kyriacou, 2016). Townend et
al. (2008) report that CBT remains the psychological therapy with the widest and broadest
evidence base. Beck et al (1979) define Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) as a concept
where an individualās emotions and behaviours are based on the way that they interpret the
world through their cognitions. NICE (2011) (cited in Clark, 2011) recommend psychological
therapies prior to medication for anxiety disorders however due to a lack of therapists in
mental health services this is not the case in clinical practice which led to the rationale for the
following research question.
2
Clinical question
Are psychological interventions more efficacious than pharmacological interventions to help
reduce social anxiety disorder (SAD) symptoms in adults?
Bragge (2010) explains that answerable clinical research questions have four essential
components known as PICO. This therapy type question was developed using these
components (P) Population: adults that experience social anxiety (I) Intervention:
Psychological interventions (C) Comparator: Pharmacological Interventions (O) Outcome:
reduction of social anxiety symptoms.
Search Strategy and Outcome
A systematic literature search was carried out using electronic databases which were
individually accessed via Queens Online, including MEDLINE, Science Direct, PschINFO
and Cochrane (see Appendix 1). Roberts and Dicenso (1999) suggest that questions in
relation to interventions and their effectiveness are best answered by randomized control
trials or based on the hierarchy of evidence, systematic reviews. BestBets.org was also
accessed for evidence based synopses.
The three papers the author deemed relevant to answer the clinical question above are as
follows;
Clark et al. (2003)
Nordahl et al (2016)
Davidson et al. (2004)
3
These three studies were chosen as their methodological design appeared to answer the
clinical questi.
1 Clinical Problem Social Anxiety is described by .docxjeremylockett77
Ā
1
Clinical Problem
Social Anxiety is described by The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American
Psychiatric Association (DSM-5) as a persistent fear of social situations where the person is
exposed to people or to possible scrutiny by others and fears that he/she will display
symptoms of anxiety or be perceived in a way that will be embarrassing and humiliating
(American Psychiatric Association, 2013). This topic was chosen as according to Kessler et
al. (2012) social anxiety is among the most common anxiety disorder affecting 13% of
individuals at some stage in their lives. From experience, and according to Krysta et al.
(2015) medication is the first line treatment for anxiety disorders due to accessibility.
Unfortunately, for people experiencing social anxiety most medications have adverse effects
such as increased agitation and sexual dysfunction (Rosen et al 1999) and some medication,
in particular benzodiazepines are highly addictive (Lader and Kyriacou, 2016). Townend et
al. (2008) report that CBT remains the psychological therapy with the widest and broadest
evidence base. Beck et al (1979) define Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) as a concept
where an individualās emotions and behaviours are based on the way that they interpret the
world through their cognitions. NICE (2011) (cited in Clark, 2011) recommend psychological
therapies prior to medication for anxiety disorders however due to a lack of therapists in
mental health services this is not the case in clinical practice which led to the rationale for the
following research question.
2
Clinical question
Are psychological interventions more efficacious than pharmacological interventions to help
reduce social anxiety disorder (SAD) symptoms in adults?
Bragge (2010) explains that answerable clinical research questions have four essential
components known as PICO. This therapy type question was developed using these
components (P) Population: adults that experience social anxiety (I) Intervention:
Psychological interventions (C) Comparator: Pharmacological Interventions (O) Outcome:
reduction of social anxiety symptoms.
Search Strategy and Outcome
A systematic literature search was carried out using electronic databases which were
individually accessed via Queens Online, including MEDLINE, Science Direct, PschINFO
and Cochrane (see Appendix 1). Roberts and Dicenso (1999) suggest that questions in
relation to interventions and their effectiveness are best answered by randomized control
trials or based on the hierarchy of evidence, systematic reviews. BestBets.org was also
accessed for evidence based synopses.
The three papers the author deemed relevant to answer the clinical question above are as
follows;
Clark et al. (2003)
Nordahl et al (2016)
Davidson et al. (2004)
3
These three studies were chosen as their methodological design appeared to answer the
clinical questi ...
Assessment 1PRINTAnalysis of Position Papers for Vulnerabl.docxgalerussel59292
Ā
Assessment 1
PRINT
Analysis of Position Papers for Vulnerable Populations
Toggle Drawer
Overview
Develop a 4ā6-page position about a specific health care issue as it relates to a target vulnerable population. Include an analysis of existing evidence and position papers to help support your position. Your analysis should also present and respond to one or more opposing viewpoints.
Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
Position papers are a method to evaluate the most current evidence and policies related to health care issues. They offer a way for researchers to explore the views of any number of organizations around a topic. This can help you to develop your own position and approach to care around a topic or issue.
SHOW LESS
This assessment will focus on analyzing position papers about an issue related to addiction, chronicity, emotional and mental health, genetics and genomics, or immunity. Many of these topics are quickly evolving as technology advances, or as we attempt to push past stigmas. For example, technology advances and DNA sequencing provide comprehensive information to allow treatment to become more targeted and effective for the individual. However as a result, nurses must be able to understand and teach patients about the impact of this information. With this great power comes concerns that patient conditions are protected in an ethical and compassionate manner.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Design evidence-based advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality population outcomes.Ā
Evaluate the evidence and positions of others that could support a team's approach to improving the quality and outcomes of care for a specific issue in a target population.
Evaluate the evidence and positions of others that are contrary to a team's approach to improving the quality and outcomes of care for a specific issue in a target population.
Competency 2: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional interventions in achieving desired population health outcomes.Ā
Explain the role of the interprofessional team in facilitating improvements for a specific issue in a target population.
Competency 3: Analyze population health outcomes in terms of their implications for health policy advocacy.Ā
Explain a position with regard to health outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.
Competency 4: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.Ā
Communicate an initial viewpoint regarding a specific issue in a target population and a synthesis of existing positions in a logically s.
Investigating the impact of curriculum on attitudes by first year occupationa...Anita Hamilton PhD
Ā
This was a presentation that I gave during the Graduate Certificate in Higher Education at Deakin University. This pilot study lead to a fourth year honours research study in 2007 by Alison Naughton.
A NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANSPERSPECTIVES ON COLLA.docxransayo
Ā
A NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS:
PERSPECTIVES ON COLLABORATION WITH
MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPISTS
Rebecca E. Clark
Lifespan Family Healthcare, Newcastle, Maine
Deanna Linville
University of Oregon
Karen H. Rosen
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Recognizing the fit between family medicine and marriage and family therapy (MFT),
members of both fields have made significant advances in collaborative health research
and practice. To add to this work, we surveyed a nationwide random sample of 240 family
physicians (FPs) and asked about their perspectives and experiences of collaboration with
MFTs. We found that FPs frequently perceive a need for their patients to receive MFT-
related care, but their referral to and collaboration with MFTs were limited. Through
responses to an open-ended question, we gained valuable information as to how MFTs
could more effectively initiate collaboration with FPs.
Despite the success of medical family therapists in providing integrative, collaborative
healthcare, we know little about how commonly family physicians (FPs) and marriage and fam-
ily therapists (MFTs) collaborate in routine patient care. To our knowledge, there have been
no studies published from the perspective of the FP that describe the extent to which FPs seek
the collaboration of MFTs, the degree to which they are aware of MFT as a field, their per-
ceived need for their patients to receive MFT, or their attitude toward MFT as a potential
resource for patient treatment.
Leaders in family medicine and MFT recognize the common occurrence of mental health
concerns arising in a medical visit. In fact, it has been estimated that more than 60% of patient
visits to primary care physicians (PCPs) include mental health concerns (Moon, 1997), and
many of these concerns may not be the presenting complaint (Jackson & Tisher, 1996;
Schurman, Kramer, & Mitchell, 1985). Several MFT ā FP teams have developed models for col-
laboration (Doherty & Baird, 1983; Dym & Berman, 1986; Hepworth & Jackson, 1985; Sea-
burn, Lorenz, Gunn, Gawinski, & Mauksch, 1996). Other researchers and practitioners have
written books that serve as a guide to other mental health practitioners for how to be effective
collaborators with other healthcare practitioners (e.g., Seaburn et al., 1996).
The specialty of family medicine, which arose in the 1960s, embraces a systemic, biopsy-
chosocial perspective to illness that stresses the importance of caring for the whole person
within his or her family, social context, and life cycle stage (Chung, 1996; Fischetti &
McCutchan, 2002). It is not surprising that FPs regularly treat their patientsā mental health
problems. By definition of their specialty, FPs are trained to integrate behavioral science con-
cepts with their biomedical training (AAFP, 2000; Seaburn et al., 1996) as well as to manage
Rebecca E. Clark, MS, Lifespan Family Healthcare, Newcastle, Maine; Deanna Linville, PhD, Couples and
Family Therapy .
1 Clinical Problem Social Anxiety is described by .docxcroftsshanon
Ā
1
Clinical Problem
Social Anxiety is described by The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American
Psychiatric Association (DSM-5) as a persistent fear of social situations where the person is
exposed to people or to possible scrutiny by others and fears that he/she will display
symptoms of anxiety or be perceived in a way that will be embarrassing and humiliating
(American Psychiatric Association, 2013). This topic was chosen as according to Kessler et
al. (2012) social anxiety is among the most common anxiety disorder affecting 13% of
individuals at some stage in their lives. From experience, and according to Krysta et al.
(2015) medication is the first line treatment for anxiety disorders due to accessibility.
Unfortunately, for people experiencing social anxiety most medications have adverse effects
such as increased agitation and sexual dysfunction (Rosen et al 1999) and some medication,
in particular benzodiazepines are highly addictive (Lader and Kyriacou, 2016). Townend et
al. (2008) report that CBT remains the psychological therapy with the widest and broadest
evidence base. Beck et al (1979) define Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) as a concept
where an individualās emotions and behaviours are based on the way that they interpret the
world through their cognitions. NICE (2011) (cited in Clark, 2011) recommend psychological
therapies prior to medication for anxiety disorders however due to a lack of therapists in
mental health services this is not the case in clinical practice which led to the rationale for the
following research question.
2
Clinical question
Are psychological interventions more efficacious than pharmacological interventions to help
reduce social anxiety disorder (SAD) symptoms in adults?
Bragge (2010) explains that answerable clinical research questions have four essential
components known as PICO. This therapy type question was developed using these
components (P) Population: adults that experience social anxiety (I) Intervention:
Psychological interventions (C) Comparator: Pharmacological Interventions (O) Outcome:
reduction of social anxiety symptoms.
Search Strategy and Outcome
A systematic literature search was carried out using electronic databases which were
individually accessed via Queens Online, including MEDLINE, Science Direct, PschINFO
and Cochrane (see Appendix 1). Roberts and Dicenso (1999) suggest that questions in
relation to interventions and their effectiveness are best answered by randomized control
trials or based on the hierarchy of evidence, systematic reviews. BestBets.org was also
accessed for evidence based synopses.
The three papers the author deemed relevant to answer the clinical question above are as
follows;
Clark et al. (2003)
Nordahl et al (2016)
Davidson et al. (2004)
3
These three studies were chosen as their methodological design appeared to answer the
clinical questi.
1 Clinical Problem Social Anxiety is described by .docxjeremylockett77
Ā
1
Clinical Problem
Social Anxiety is described by The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American
Psychiatric Association (DSM-5) as a persistent fear of social situations where the person is
exposed to people or to possible scrutiny by others and fears that he/she will display
symptoms of anxiety or be perceived in a way that will be embarrassing and humiliating
(American Psychiatric Association, 2013). This topic was chosen as according to Kessler et
al. (2012) social anxiety is among the most common anxiety disorder affecting 13% of
individuals at some stage in their lives. From experience, and according to Krysta et al.
(2015) medication is the first line treatment for anxiety disorders due to accessibility.
Unfortunately, for people experiencing social anxiety most medications have adverse effects
such as increased agitation and sexual dysfunction (Rosen et al 1999) and some medication,
in particular benzodiazepines are highly addictive (Lader and Kyriacou, 2016). Townend et
al. (2008) report that CBT remains the psychological therapy with the widest and broadest
evidence base. Beck et al (1979) define Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) as a concept
where an individualās emotions and behaviours are based on the way that they interpret the
world through their cognitions. NICE (2011) (cited in Clark, 2011) recommend psychological
therapies prior to medication for anxiety disorders however due to a lack of therapists in
mental health services this is not the case in clinical practice which led to the rationale for the
following research question.
2
Clinical question
Are psychological interventions more efficacious than pharmacological interventions to help
reduce social anxiety disorder (SAD) symptoms in adults?
Bragge (2010) explains that answerable clinical research questions have four essential
components known as PICO. This therapy type question was developed using these
components (P) Population: adults that experience social anxiety (I) Intervention:
Psychological interventions (C) Comparator: Pharmacological Interventions (O) Outcome:
reduction of social anxiety symptoms.
Search Strategy and Outcome
A systematic literature search was carried out using electronic databases which were
individually accessed via Queens Online, including MEDLINE, Science Direct, PschINFO
and Cochrane (see Appendix 1). Roberts and Dicenso (1999) suggest that questions in
relation to interventions and their effectiveness are best answered by randomized control
trials or based on the hierarchy of evidence, systematic reviews. BestBets.org was also
accessed for evidence based synopses.
The three papers the author deemed relevant to answer the clinical question above are as
follows;
Clark et al. (2003)
Nordahl et al (2016)
Davidson et al. (2004)
3
These three studies were chosen as their methodological design appeared to answer the
clinical questi ...
Assessment 1PRINTAnalysis of Position Papers for Vulnerabl.docxgalerussel59292
Ā
Assessment 1
PRINT
Analysis of Position Papers for Vulnerable Populations
Toggle Drawer
Overview
Develop a 4ā6-page position about a specific health care issue as it relates to a target vulnerable population. Include an analysis of existing evidence and position papers to help support your position. Your analysis should also present and respond to one or more opposing viewpoints.
Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
Position papers are a method to evaluate the most current evidence and policies related to health care issues. They offer a way for researchers to explore the views of any number of organizations around a topic. This can help you to develop your own position and approach to care around a topic or issue.
SHOW LESS
This assessment will focus on analyzing position papers about an issue related to addiction, chronicity, emotional and mental health, genetics and genomics, or immunity. Many of these topics are quickly evolving as technology advances, or as we attempt to push past stigmas. For example, technology advances and DNA sequencing provide comprehensive information to allow treatment to become more targeted and effective for the individual. However as a result, nurses must be able to understand and teach patients about the impact of this information. With this great power comes concerns that patient conditions are protected in an ethical and compassionate manner.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Design evidence-based advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality population outcomes.Ā
Evaluate the evidence and positions of others that could support a team's approach to improving the quality and outcomes of care for a specific issue in a target population.
Evaluate the evidence and positions of others that are contrary to a team's approach to improving the quality and outcomes of care for a specific issue in a target population.
Competency 2: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional interventions in achieving desired population health outcomes.Ā
Explain the role of the interprofessional team in facilitating improvements for a specific issue in a target population.
Competency 3: Analyze population health outcomes in terms of their implications for health policy advocacy.Ā
Explain a position with regard to health outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.
Competency 4: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.Ā
Communicate an initial viewpoint regarding a specific issue in a target population and a synthesis of existing positions in a logically s.
Investigating the impact of curriculum on attitudes by first year occupationa...Anita Hamilton PhD
Ā
This was a presentation that I gave during the Graduate Certificate in Higher Education at Deakin University. This pilot study lead to a fourth year honours research study in 2007 by Alison Naughton.
A NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANSPERSPECTIVES ON COLLA.docxransayo
Ā
A NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS:
PERSPECTIVES ON COLLABORATION WITH
MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPISTS
Rebecca E. Clark
Lifespan Family Healthcare, Newcastle, Maine
Deanna Linville
University of Oregon
Karen H. Rosen
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Recognizing the fit between family medicine and marriage and family therapy (MFT),
members of both fields have made significant advances in collaborative health research
and practice. To add to this work, we surveyed a nationwide random sample of 240 family
physicians (FPs) and asked about their perspectives and experiences of collaboration with
MFTs. We found that FPs frequently perceive a need for their patients to receive MFT-
related care, but their referral to and collaboration with MFTs were limited. Through
responses to an open-ended question, we gained valuable information as to how MFTs
could more effectively initiate collaboration with FPs.
Despite the success of medical family therapists in providing integrative, collaborative
healthcare, we know little about how commonly family physicians (FPs) and marriage and fam-
ily therapists (MFTs) collaborate in routine patient care. To our knowledge, there have been
no studies published from the perspective of the FP that describe the extent to which FPs seek
the collaboration of MFTs, the degree to which they are aware of MFT as a field, their per-
ceived need for their patients to receive MFT, or their attitude toward MFT as a potential
resource for patient treatment.
Leaders in family medicine and MFT recognize the common occurrence of mental health
concerns arising in a medical visit. In fact, it has been estimated that more than 60% of patient
visits to primary care physicians (PCPs) include mental health concerns (Moon, 1997), and
many of these concerns may not be the presenting complaint (Jackson & Tisher, 1996;
Schurman, Kramer, & Mitchell, 1985). Several MFT ā FP teams have developed models for col-
laboration (Doherty & Baird, 1983; Dym & Berman, 1986; Hepworth & Jackson, 1985; Sea-
burn, Lorenz, Gunn, Gawinski, & Mauksch, 1996). Other researchers and practitioners have
written books that serve as a guide to other mental health practitioners for how to be effective
collaborators with other healthcare practitioners (e.g., Seaburn et al., 1996).
The specialty of family medicine, which arose in the 1960s, embraces a systemic, biopsy-
chosocial perspective to illness that stresses the importance of caring for the whole person
within his or her family, social context, and life cycle stage (Chung, 1996; Fischetti &
McCutchan, 2002). It is not surprising that FPs regularly treat their patientsā mental health
problems. By definition of their specialty, FPs are trained to integrate behavioral science con-
cepts with their biomedical training (AAFP, 2000; Seaburn et al., 1996) as well as to manage
Rebecca E. Clark, MS, Lifespan Family Healthcare, Newcastle, Maine; Deanna Linville, PhD, Couples and
Family Therapy .
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Ā
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
Ā
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using āinvisibleā attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Ā
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
Ā
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Ā
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
Ā
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Ā
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
Ā
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.