 Name: Praful Ghareniya

 Roll no.:20

 topic : Explain of the theatre absurd and symbol in waiting for Godot
 M.A. Semester: 3

 Enrolment No.:

 Year: 2015-16

 Paper no.: 9

 Email ID.: prafulghareniya@gmail.com

 Submitted to: Department of English
 Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University
His is born on 1906
His died on 1989
His work on ..
Waiting for Godot (1953)
He won Nobel Prize in
Literature at 1969
Samuel Beckett
 The theatre of the absurd is also know as a new theatre .
 It means
the word Absurd foolishness, senseless,
opposed to reason,
something silly and ridiculous
What is theater absurd ?
Myth of Sisyphus
 French philosopher Albert
Camus in his essay
the myth of Sisyphus in which
he defines the
human condition as basically
meaningless
Sisyphus defied the god and put
death in chain so that no human
needed to die
When god decide on his
punishment for all eternity
He would have push rock up a
mountain upon reaching the top
the rock down again.
 Meaninglessness of life
 No wonder
 Lack of plot
 Element of existentialism
 Every hard contain
 Puzzled dialogues
 Nonsense language
 Importance of repetition
 Absurd and unexpected ending
 Comic scenes
 Different from traditional drama
Main feature of the theatre of Absurd
 Theatre of absurd presented the life as meaningless and one that
could simply end in casual slaughter this was reflected in the
society of the time.it was because of the
following reasons
 1) mechanical nature of man of the life
 2) Alien worlds
 3) Isolation
 4)time
MEANIGNLESS OF LIFE
Ex. It lacks the traditional standards of drama, no causal chain of
effects and events, no Aristotle’s structure of drama
Lack of the Plot
no
beginning
No endingNo middle
 Theatre of the absurd have not the conventional story which can
convince the readers or viewers.
 Ex. In this play Estragon & Vladimir always waiting for the man
namely Godot who never come.
Non Conventional Story:
Contradiction and repetition of the
dialogues
For example Vladimir yells to
Estragon: “Come on . . . return the
ball can’t you, once in a
way?” Vladimir’s complaint is
descriptive of much of the
dialogue in the remainder of the
play
 One more Ex.,
 We’re waiting for Godot (pg-51)
 Boy: I don’t know sir:
 Repetition of the objects
 Ex.
Devaluation of The Language
 The absurd dramatist felt that
conventional language had
failed man and it was
inadequate means of
communication. The
uselessness of language was
used by the characters
constantly; they speak in clichés,
overused, tired expressions.
They use language to feel the
emptiness between them, to
conceal the fact that they have
'nothing' to talk about to each
other.
 Ex. Lucky’s speech in Act-1
(quaquaquaquaqua
Cyclical Structure
 In fact, everything is structured
by this revenge motive. But in
Waiting for Godot, where there
is no motivated action, the
sense of nothingness play the
pivotal role in determining the
every aspect of the play.
Absurd play has a repetitive
cyclical structure.
 Similar setting- Debris
 Timing- day to moon rise
 Actions- hat Swapping scene
 Similar Acts structure
 Same acts ending
Difference from poetic theatre
 No use of dreams, fantasy and poetic
language
Element of Existentialism
 Absurd theatre questions the
existence of man. Absurdist
believes in the godless world.
the air is full our cries
 Human existence has no meaning and
purpose.
 “The mystery of human existence lies
not in just staying alive, but in finding
something to live
for”
 society of that time was cut off from religion, it was presented in
absurd play
 Example
Vladimir and Estragon talking about thieves that
were crucified with Christ just passing time
=> The tree was symbol of Christianity
Cut off from religion
 Absurd play has unexplained ending
 Hope, religion, nothingness, forgetfulness, purposelessness' of
man,
 ending is not Conclusion.
 Another example is at the end of both acts, they talks about going
but no one goes:

Absurd Ending:
 Tree
 Boot
 hat
symbol
the modernist literature study

the modernist literature study

  • 1.
     Name: PrafulGhareniya   Roll no.:20   topic : Explain of the theatre absurd and symbol in waiting for Godot  M.A. Semester: 3   Enrolment No.:   Year: 2015-16   Paper no.: 9   Email ID.: prafulghareniya@gmail.com   Submitted to: Department of English  Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University
  • 2.
    His is bornon 1906 His died on 1989 His work on .. Waiting for Godot (1953) He won Nobel Prize in Literature at 1969 Samuel Beckett
  • 3.
     The theatreof the absurd is also know as a new theatre .  It means the word Absurd foolishness, senseless, opposed to reason, something silly and ridiculous What is theater absurd ?
  • 4.
    Myth of Sisyphus French philosopher Albert Camus in his essay the myth of Sisyphus in which he defines the human condition as basically meaningless Sisyphus defied the god and put death in chain so that no human needed to die When god decide on his punishment for all eternity He would have push rock up a mountain upon reaching the top the rock down again.
  • 5.
     Meaninglessness oflife  No wonder  Lack of plot  Element of existentialism  Every hard contain  Puzzled dialogues  Nonsense language  Importance of repetition  Absurd and unexpected ending  Comic scenes  Different from traditional drama Main feature of the theatre of Absurd
  • 6.
     Theatre ofabsurd presented the life as meaningless and one that could simply end in casual slaughter this was reflected in the society of the time.it was because of the following reasons  1) mechanical nature of man of the life  2) Alien worlds  3) Isolation  4)time MEANIGNLESS OF LIFE
  • 7.
    Ex. It lacksthe traditional standards of drama, no causal chain of effects and events, no Aristotle’s structure of drama Lack of the Plot no beginning No endingNo middle
  • 8.
     Theatre ofthe absurd have not the conventional story which can convince the readers or viewers.  Ex. In this play Estragon & Vladimir always waiting for the man namely Godot who never come. Non Conventional Story:
  • 9.
    Contradiction and repetitionof the dialogues For example Vladimir yells to Estragon: “Come on . . . return the ball can’t you, once in a way?” Vladimir’s complaint is descriptive of much of the dialogue in the remainder of the play  One more Ex.,  We’re waiting for Godot (pg-51)  Boy: I don’t know sir:  Repetition of the objects  Ex.
  • 10.
    Devaluation of TheLanguage  The absurd dramatist felt that conventional language had failed man and it was inadequate means of communication. The uselessness of language was used by the characters constantly; they speak in clichés, overused, tired expressions. They use language to feel the emptiness between them, to conceal the fact that they have 'nothing' to talk about to each other.  Ex. Lucky’s speech in Act-1 (quaquaquaquaqua
  • 11.
    Cyclical Structure  Infact, everything is structured by this revenge motive. But in Waiting for Godot, where there is no motivated action, the sense of nothingness play the pivotal role in determining the every aspect of the play. Absurd play has a repetitive cyclical structure.  Similar setting- Debris  Timing- day to moon rise  Actions- hat Swapping scene  Similar Acts structure  Same acts ending
  • 12.
    Difference from poetictheatre  No use of dreams, fantasy and poetic language Element of Existentialism  Absurd theatre questions the existence of man. Absurdist believes in the godless world. the air is full our cries  Human existence has no meaning and purpose.  “The mystery of human existence lies not in just staying alive, but in finding something to live for”
  • 13.
     society ofthat time was cut off from religion, it was presented in absurd play  Example Vladimir and Estragon talking about thieves that were crucified with Christ just passing time => The tree was symbol of Christianity Cut off from religion
  • 14.
     Absurd playhas unexplained ending  Hope, religion, nothingness, forgetfulness, purposelessness' of man,  ending is not Conclusion.  Another example is at the end of both acts, they talks about going but no one goes:  Absurd Ending:
  • 15.