This booklet explains why oil was the real cause of the First World War, and explains the economic and geopolitical interests behind all the major players of this war.
Moreover it compares the first Great War for oil in 1914 with the oil wars of 2014 in Syria and Iraq one hundred years later.
World War I began when Germany invaded Belgium on August 5, 1914, marking the start of the first major engagement. By 1914, Europe was divided into two alliance systems - the Triple Alliance of Germany, Italy, and Austria-Hungary, and the Triple Entente of Britain, France, and Russia. Tensions had been rising for years due to military and imperial rivalries, nationalist tensions in the Balkans, and a system of alliances that made a major war more likely to spread. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by Serbian nationalists in June 1914 triggered a series of events that led Austria-Hungary to declare war on Serbia, setting off a chain reaction of military mobil
A Brief Summary of the First World War for Oiliakovosal
The document provides a brief summary of the First World War for Oil from 1914-1918. Key factors included Germany's desire to connect to the Persian Gulf via the Baghdad Railway, threatening British control of Gulf oil. Germany and its allies Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire threatened Russian and British influence in the region. The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand provided the spark that ignited World War I, which was ultimately about controlling oil resources in the Middle East.
On June 28, 1914 in Sarajevo, six Serbian terrorists assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria and his wife. One terrorist threw a bomb at the Archduke's car but missed. Later, when the Archduke's car took a wrong turn by accident, one of the terrorists shot and killed Franz Ferdinand and his wife at close range. This assassination sparked increased tensions between Serbia and Austria-Hungary and helped precipitate the start of World War I.
The document provides an overview of the key events that led to the start of World War 1 in 1914. It discusses the rise of nationalism, imperialism, and militarism in Europe in the late 19th century. Alliances formed between the major European powers which increased tensions. The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand sparked the war, with countries honoring their alliances and entering the war on opposing sides. The initial fighting occurred on the Western and Eastern fronts, with major battles inflicting heavy casualties. The US eventually entered the war in 1917 after German submarine warfare threatened American ships.
World War I began in 1914 after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serbian nationalist. This triggered a series of alliances that drew the major powers of Europe into war. The war was caused by militarism, imperialism, nationalism, and a system of interlocking alliances. It resulted in over 15 million military and civilian casualties and ended with the defeat of the Central Powers by the Allied forces in 1918. The Treaty of Versailles and its harsh terms against Germany set the stage for World War II.
Germany was largely responsible for starting World War I according to the document. While tensions between Austria-Hungary and Serbia contributed to the war, Germany encouraged Austria-Hungary to challenge Serbia and pledged military support through the "Blank Cheque". Additionally, Germany had long-term aggressive aims to expand its power and reduce its rivals, as evidenced in the Bethmann Memorandum. Germany also took actions like naval buildup and interventions in Morocco that increased tensions with Britain and France. So while many factors led to the war, Germany played the biggest role through its ambitions and provocations of conflict.
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: BISMARCK AIMS. Contains: general overview, politics, Dreikaiserbund, ensure cooperation, the war in sight crisis, German diplomatic defeat, crisis in the Balkans,
Why did europe go to war in 1914, essayPaula Ledesma
The document discusses several long-term and short-term causes that led to World War 1 in 1914. The short-term cause was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria and his wife by a Serbian nationalist in Sarajevo. However, there were also several important long-term causes, including the system of alliances between European powers, imperialism, militarism, and nationalism. The alliances divided Europe into opposing teams and turned local conflicts into international wars. Militarism and imperialism increased tensions as nations built up their armed forces and competed for colonies. Nationalism also heightened tensions over territories like the Balkans and encouraged conflicts between nations like Austria-Hungary and Serbia.
World War I began when Germany invaded Belgium on August 5, 1914, marking the start of the first major engagement. By 1914, Europe was divided into two alliance systems - the Triple Alliance of Germany, Italy, and Austria-Hungary, and the Triple Entente of Britain, France, and Russia. Tensions had been rising for years due to military and imperial rivalries, nationalist tensions in the Balkans, and a system of alliances that made a major war more likely to spread. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by Serbian nationalists in June 1914 triggered a series of events that led Austria-Hungary to declare war on Serbia, setting off a chain reaction of military mobil
A Brief Summary of the First World War for Oiliakovosal
The document provides a brief summary of the First World War for Oil from 1914-1918. Key factors included Germany's desire to connect to the Persian Gulf via the Baghdad Railway, threatening British control of Gulf oil. Germany and its allies Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire threatened Russian and British influence in the region. The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand provided the spark that ignited World War I, which was ultimately about controlling oil resources in the Middle East.
On June 28, 1914 in Sarajevo, six Serbian terrorists assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria and his wife. One terrorist threw a bomb at the Archduke's car but missed. Later, when the Archduke's car took a wrong turn by accident, one of the terrorists shot and killed Franz Ferdinand and his wife at close range. This assassination sparked increased tensions between Serbia and Austria-Hungary and helped precipitate the start of World War I.
The document provides an overview of the key events that led to the start of World War 1 in 1914. It discusses the rise of nationalism, imperialism, and militarism in Europe in the late 19th century. Alliances formed between the major European powers which increased tensions. The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand sparked the war, with countries honoring their alliances and entering the war on opposing sides. The initial fighting occurred on the Western and Eastern fronts, with major battles inflicting heavy casualties. The US eventually entered the war in 1917 after German submarine warfare threatened American ships.
World War I began in 1914 after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serbian nationalist. This triggered a series of alliances that drew the major powers of Europe into war. The war was caused by militarism, imperialism, nationalism, and a system of interlocking alliances. It resulted in over 15 million military and civilian casualties and ended with the defeat of the Central Powers by the Allied forces in 1918. The Treaty of Versailles and its harsh terms against Germany set the stage for World War II.
Germany was largely responsible for starting World War I according to the document. While tensions between Austria-Hungary and Serbia contributed to the war, Germany encouraged Austria-Hungary to challenge Serbia and pledged military support through the "Blank Cheque". Additionally, Germany had long-term aggressive aims to expand its power and reduce its rivals, as evidenced in the Bethmann Memorandum. Germany also took actions like naval buildup and interventions in Morocco that increased tensions with Britain and France. So while many factors led to the war, Germany played the biggest role through its ambitions and provocations of conflict.
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: BISMARCK AIMS. Contains: general overview, politics, Dreikaiserbund, ensure cooperation, the war in sight crisis, German diplomatic defeat, crisis in the Balkans,
Why did europe go to war in 1914, essayPaula Ledesma
The document discusses several long-term and short-term causes that led to World War 1 in 1914. The short-term cause was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria and his wife by a Serbian nationalist in Sarajevo. However, there were also several important long-term causes, including the system of alliances between European powers, imperialism, militarism, and nationalism. The alliances divided Europe into opposing teams and turned local conflicts into international wars. Militarism and imperialism increased tensions as nations built up their armed forces and competed for colonies. Nationalism also heightened tensions over territories like the Balkans and encouraged conflicts between nations like Austria-Hungary and Serbia.
Henry I seized power in England after the accidental death of his brother, William II. However, Henry had no male heir, so upon his death a war erupted between his nephew Stephen and his daughter Empress Matilda over succession to the English throne. This war plunged England into 19 years of chaos and civil war known as "The Anarchy", as barons took advantage of the lack of strong royal authority to terrorize the people.
1 the main causes of wwi slideshare versiondumouchelle
The main causes of WWI were militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism. A network of alliances drew the major European powers into war after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serbian nationalist. Germany backed Austria-Hungary's declaration of war on Serbia, leading Russia and its allies to declare war on Germany and Austria-Hungary, starting World War I.
The document provides background information on the causes of World War I, including nationalism, imperialism, militarism, and the system of alliances between European powers. It describes how nationalist sentiments led countries to build up their militaries in an arms race. Competing colonial interests exacerbated tensions. By 1914, Germany and Austria-Hungary were allied against Russia, France, and Britain in a complex network that caused the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand to trigger a chain reaction leading those countries to declare war on each other.
The document summarizes major events of 1917-1918 that led to the end of World War 1. It describes how the Russian monarchy collapsed and a new provisional government took over, but was unstable and split between communist Bolsheviks and democratic Mensheviks. Germany allowed Lenin to return to Russia to help destabilize it. In the US, Woodrow Wilson led the country to enter the war against Germany in 1917. On the Western Front, German offensives were stopped in 1918 and they were forced to retreat. Austria asked for an armistice in November 1918, followed by Germany's leaders abdicating and agreeing to an armistice on November 11th. Peace negotiations took place in Paris in 1919
The document summarizes the system of alliances in Europe leading up to World War 1. Key events include:
- Bismarck created a system of alliances to isolate France after the Franco-Prussian war, including the Three Emperors' League and Dual Alliance with Austria.
- The Triple Alliance was formed in 1882 between Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy in response to the Franco-Russian Alliance of 1893.
- Britain remained isolated until forming the Entente Cordiale with France in 1904 to counter growing German influence, completing the two opposing alliance systems in Europe on the eve of World War 1.
Nationalism, imperialism, militarism, and alliances all contributed to the causes of World War I. Nationalistic sentiments led countries to build up their armies and navies in competition. Imperialism and the scramble for African colonies caused disputes over territory. An arms race developed as countries increased their militarization. Finally, countries formed alliances that divided Europe into opposing factions, setting the stage for a major conflict.
Alliances in Europe prior to WWI divided the continent into two opposing sides. Germany's location in central Europe made it vulnerable without strong alliances. Originally, Bismarck's system of alliances with Russia and Austria-Hungary protected Germany. However, Kaiser Wilhelm broke with Russia and allowed the formation of the Triple Entente between Britain, France and Russia. By 1914, a network of treaties and alliances had formed the Allied Powers and Central Powers, setting the stage for World War I to break out after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.
The Treaty of Versailles was signed on June 28, 1919 to end World War 1. It assigned blame for the war to Germany and required it to disarm, make territorial concessions, and pay extensive reparations. The treaty redrew the map of Europe, established the League of Nations, and caused lingering resentment in Germany that Hitler would later exploit.
The document discusses the Treaty of Versailles that ended World War 1. It describes how the Allied powers of France, Britain, and the US disagreed on how harsh the terms for Germany should be. France wanted harsh punishment and reparations for the damage Germany caused, while Britain and the US wanted milder terms to avoid Germany seeking revenge in the future. The final treaty signed in Versailles placed heavy blame and reparations on Germany, taking away land and military forces. This humiliated Germany and left it unable to pay the imposed costs, sowing resentment that some argue contributed to the rise of Hitler.
A detailed analysis on World War I & IIJunaet Zaman
World War 1 began in 1914 after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by Serbian nationalists. This sparked a series of military and political events that drew in countries from Europe and around the world into two opposing alliances - the Allies and Central Powers. Over the next four years, over 15 million soldiers and civilians would lose their lives in the war before an armistice was declared on November 11, 1918. The economic and political consequences of the war were immense and long lasting.
Nationalism, militarism, and the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand were key causes of World War 1. Nationalism increased tensions as countries wanted to expand their territory and demonstrate their dominance. Militarism exacerbated these tensions as countries aggressively increased their military strength. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand by a Serbian nationalist group was the spark that ignited hostilities among the countries due to overlapping alliances.
The immediate cause of WWI was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serbian nationalist. However, several underlying long-term factors contributed to the outbreak of war, including a web of alliances that drew more countries into the conflict, imperialism and competition for colonies, the arms race and militarism of European powers, and rising nationalism within and among countries that increased tensions.
World War I was caused by increasing tensions between European powers due to militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Militarism led to an arms race and glorification of military strength, imperialism increased competition over colonies, and alliances divided Europe into opposing factions. Nationalism further heightened tensions, especially in the Balkans where Slavic nationalism challenged Austrian rule. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand by a Serbian nationalist triggered a series of events that caused the powers to take sides and engage in World War I.
Women took on many non-traditional roles during World War 1, from factory work to civil service to medical roles. Photos show women working as ambulance drivers, munitions workers, police, and in the newly formed women's branches of the military. Their contributions helped advance the women's suffrage movement in Britain.
The document summarizes the history of Berlin from its origins as a small town established on the Spree River in 1244 to its growth as the capital of Germany. It discusses Berlin's division after World War 2 into East and West Berlin under the control of the Soviet Union and Western Allies respectively, and its eventual reunification in 1990 after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. Major events covered include the rule of the Hohenzollern dynasty that expanded Berlin's population and influence, its position as the capital of Prussia and later a unified German Empire, and its role in the center of the Cold War divide between East and West Germany until reunification.
The document summarizes European colonial intrusion into Somalia in the late 19th century and the resulting Somali resistance. It describes how various European powers - Britain, France, Italy, and Abyssinia - established control over different parts of Somalia through treaties and military campaigns. This led to the partitioning of Somali territories among these powers. The document also details the initial Italian colonization of southern Somalia and the resistance put up by the Biyamaal and Wa'daan clans against the Italian attempts to control their lands, which included blockading the port city of Marka for many years. The resistance remained disorganized for over a decade before taking a more organized form under new leaders in 1906-1907.
The document summarizes the history of war in Afghanistan over several decades. It describes the Soviet war from 1979-1989 against mujahideen fighters including Osama bin Laden. From 1989-2001 it discusses the civil war and rise of the Taliban, as well as al-Qaeda training camps. Finally, it outlines the US-led war from 2001 onward in response to 9/11, including the establishment of ISAF, ongoing battles with the Taliban, and drone strikes targeting insurgent leaders in Pakistan.
Changing Cold War Relations - afghanistan warmrmarr
The Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in 1979 to prop up the communist government that came to power after a 1978 revolution. However, many Afghans opposed communist rule and fought back as mujahedeen rebels in a civil war. The Soviet invasion was intended to ensure communist control and give the Soviets access to oil, but they faced guerrilla warfare tactics from the mujahedeen. After 10 years of fighting, the costly and unwinnable war became a disaster for the Soviets similar to the US in Vietnam, and Soviet troops withdrew in 1989.
The Soviet-Afghan War began in 1978 when the Soviet Union intervened to support the communist government in Afghanistan against anti-communist mujahideen rebels. The intervention sparked condemnation from Western nations and the US began supporting the mujahideen to resist the Soviets. The war led to over 1 million Afghan deaths and the withdrawal of Soviet troops in 1989, marking the beginning of the end of the Soviet Union. For Afghanistan, it was the beginning of decades of continued conflict.
The document summarizes the major global flows of natural gas exports as depicted in a Wikipedia map. It notes that Russia is the largest exporter of natural gas via pipeline, exporting over 211 billion cubic meters to Europe and Asia. Qatar is the largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG) by ship, exporting over 112 billion cubic meters to countries like Japan, South Korea, India, and Europe. The document provides an overview of the other major natural gas exporters and their recipients, with the goal of outlining the major trade partners and geopolitical relationships between gas exporting and importing nations.
Henry I seized power in England after the accidental death of his brother, William II. However, Henry had no male heir, so upon his death a war erupted between his nephew Stephen and his daughter Empress Matilda over succession to the English throne. This war plunged England into 19 years of chaos and civil war known as "The Anarchy", as barons took advantage of the lack of strong royal authority to terrorize the people.
1 the main causes of wwi slideshare versiondumouchelle
The main causes of WWI were militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism. A network of alliances drew the major European powers into war after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serbian nationalist. Germany backed Austria-Hungary's declaration of war on Serbia, leading Russia and its allies to declare war on Germany and Austria-Hungary, starting World War I.
The document provides background information on the causes of World War I, including nationalism, imperialism, militarism, and the system of alliances between European powers. It describes how nationalist sentiments led countries to build up their militaries in an arms race. Competing colonial interests exacerbated tensions. By 1914, Germany and Austria-Hungary were allied against Russia, France, and Britain in a complex network that caused the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand to trigger a chain reaction leading those countries to declare war on each other.
The document summarizes major events of 1917-1918 that led to the end of World War 1. It describes how the Russian monarchy collapsed and a new provisional government took over, but was unstable and split between communist Bolsheviks and democratic Mensheviks. Germany allowed Lenin to return to Russia to help destabilize it. In the US, Woodrow Wilson led the country to enter the war against Germany in 1917. On the Western Front, German offensives were stopped in 1918 and they were forced to retreat. Austria asked for an armistice in November 1918, followed by Germany's leaders abdicating and agreeing to an armistice on November 11th. Peace negotiations took place in Paris in 1919
The document summarizes the system of alliances in Europe leading up to World War 1. Key events include:
- Bismarck created a system of alliances to isolate France after the Franco-Prussian war, including the Three Emperors' League and Dual Alliance with Austria.
- The Triple Alliance was formed in 1882 between Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy in response to the Franco-Russian Alliance of 1893.
- Britain remained isolated until forming the Entente Cordiale with France in 1904 to counter growing German influence, completing the two opposing alliance systems in Europe on the eve of World War 1.
Nationalism, imperialism, militarism, and alliances all contributed to the causes of World War I. Nationalistic sentiments led countries to build up their armies and navies in competition. Imperialism and the scramble for African colonies caused disputes over territory. An arms race developed as countries increased their militarization. Finally, countries formed alliances that divided Europe into opposing factions, setting the stage for a major conflict.
Alliances in Europe prior to WWI divided the continent into two opposing sides. Germany's location in central Europe made it vulnerable without strong alliances. Originally, Bismarck's system of alliances with Russia and Austria-Hungary protected Germany. However, Kaiser Wilhelm broke with Russia and allowed the formation of the Triple Entente between Britain, France and Russia. By 1914, a network of treaties and alliances had formed the Allied Powers and Central Powers, setting the stage for World War I to break out after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.
The Treaty of Versailles was signed on June 28, 1919 to end World War 1. It assigned blame for the war to Germany and required it to disarm, make territorial concessions, and pay extensive reparations. The treaty redrew the map of Europe, established the League of Nations, and caused lingering resentment in Germany that Hitler would later exploit.
The document discusses the Treaty of Versailles that ended World War 1. It describes how the Allied powers of France, Britain, and the US disagreed on how harsh the terms for Germany should be. France wanted harsh punishment and reparations for the damage Germany caused, while Britain and the US wanted milder terms to avoid Germany seeking revenge in the future. The final treaty signed in Versailles placed heavy blame and reparations on Germany, taking away land and military forces. This humiliated Germany and left it unable to pay the imposed costs, sowing resentment that some argue contributed to the rise of Hitler.
A detailed analysis on World War I & IIJunaet Zaman
World War 1 began in 1914 after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by Serbian nationalists. This sparked a series of military and political events that drew in countries from Europe and around the world into two opposing alliances - the Allies and Central Powers. Over the next four years, over 15 million soldiers and civilians would lose their lives in the war before an armistice was declared on November 11, 1918. The economic and political consequences of the war were immense and long lasting.
Nationalism, militarism, and the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand were key causes of World War 1. Nationalism increased tensions as countries wanted to expand their territory and demonstrate their dominance. Militarism exacerbated these tensions as countries aggressively increased their military strength. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand by a Serbian nationalist group was the spark that ignited hostilities among the countries due to overlapping alliances.
The immediate cause of WWI was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serbian nationalist. However, several underlying long-term factors contributed to the outbreak of war, including a web of alliances that drew more countries into the conflict, imperialism and competition for colonies, the arms race and militarism of European powers, and rising nationalism within and among countries that increased tensions.
World War I was caused by increasing tensions between European powers due to militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Militarism led to an arms race and glorification of military strength, imperialism increased competition over colonies, and alliances divided Europe into opposing factions. Nationalism further heightened tensions, especially in the Balkans where Slavic nationalism challenged Austrian rule. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand by a Serbian nationalist triggered a series of events that caused the powers to take sides and engage in World War I.
Women took on many non-traditional roles during World War 1, from factory work to civil service to medical roles. Photos show women working as ambulance drivers, munitions workers, police, and in the newly formed women's branches of the military. Their contributions helped advance the women's suffrage movement in Britain.
The document summarizes the history of Berlin from its origins as a small town established on the Spree River in 1244 to its growth as the capital of Germany. It discusses Berlin's division after World War 2 into East and West Berlin under the control of the Soviet Union and Western Allies respectively, and its eventual reunification in 1990 after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. Major events covered include the rule of the Hohenzollern dynasty that expanded Berlin's population and influence, its position as the capital of Prussia and later a unified German Empire, and its role in the center of the Cold War divide between East and West Germany until reunification.
The document summarizes European colonial intrusion into Somalia in the late 19th century and the resulting Somali resistance. It describes how various European powers - Britain, France, Italy, and Abyssinia - established control over different parts of Somalia through treaties and military campaigns. This led to the partitioning of Somali territories among these powers. The document also details the initial Italian colonization of southern Somalia and the resistance put up by the Biyamaal and Wa'daan clans against the Italian attempts to control their lands, which included blockading the port city of Marka for many years. The resistance remained disorganized for over a decade before taking a more organized form under new leaders in 1906-1907.
The document summarizes the history of war in Afghanistan over several decades. It describes the Soviet war from 1979-1989 against mujahideen fighters including Osama bin Laden. From 1989-2001 it discusses the civil war and rise of the Taliban, as well as al-Qaeda training camps. Finally, it outlines the US-led war from 2001 onward in response to 9/11, including the establishment of ISAF, ongoing battles with the Taliban, and drone strikes targeting insurgent leaders in Pakistan.
Changing Cold War Relations - afghanistan warmrmarr
The Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in 1979 to prop up the communist government that came to power after a 1978 revolution. However, many Afghans opposed communist rule and fought back as mujahedeen rebels in a civil war. The Soviet invasion was intended to ensure communist control and give the Soviets access to oil, but they faced guerrilla warfare tactics from the mujahedeen. After 10 years of fighting, the costly and unwinnable war became a disaster for the Soviets similar to the US in Vietnam, and Soviet troops withdrew in 1989.
The Soviet-Afghan War began in 1978 when the Soviet Union intervened to support the communist government in Afghanistan against anti-communist mujahideen rebels. The intervention sparked condemnation from Western nations and the US began supporting the mujahideen to resist the Soviets. The war led to over 1 million Afghan deaths and the withdrawal of Soviet troops in 1989, marking the beginning of the end of the Soviet Union. For Afghanistan, it was the beginning of decades of continued conflict.
The document summarizes the major global flows of natural gas exports as depicted in a Wikipedia map. It notes that Russia is the largest exporter of natural gas via pipeline, exporting over 211 billion cubic meters to Europe and Asia. Qatar is the largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG) by ship, exporting over 112 billion cubic meters to countries like Japan, South Korea, India, and Europe. The document provides an overview of the other major natural gas exporters and their recipients, with the goal of outlining the major trade partners and geopolitical relationships between gas exporting and importing nations.
The Causes Behind the Conflict Between Turkey and Israeliakovosal
This short essay explains the true causes behind the conflict of the once close allies of Turkey and Israel. It turns out that as it is usually the case, the true reason for this conflict is oil and natural gas.
The Israel Lebaon War of 2006 and the Ceyhan-Haifa Pipelineiakovosal
- The document discusses the Baku-Ceyhan and proposed Ceyhan-Haifa pipelines, which would transport oil and gas from the Caspian Sea region and Iraq to markets in Europe, Asia, and Israel while bypassing Iran and Russia.
- It suggests that the 2006 Israel-Lebanon war, in which Hezbollah kidnapped Israeli soldiers near the Lebanese border, may have been provoked in part to disrupt the proposed pipeline which had economic and strategic implications for Iran and Russia.
- Reactions to the war from countries in the region are also summarized based on their economic and strategic interests regarding energy pipelines and relations with Israel, Iran, and other involved parties.
European Union VS Germany : Nord Stream 2iakovosal
The document discusses the Nord Stream 2 pipeline agreement between Russia's Gazprom and several European energy companies to transport natural gas from Russia to Europe. This agreement bypasses existing pipeline infrastructure in Ukraine and could violate the European Union's Third Energy Package. While Germany supports the project, many other EU members and countries like Ukraine oppose it as it could increase Europe's dependence on Russia and reduce energy revenues for Ukraine. There are concerns the project ignores European unity and that Germany and Russia's economic cooperation could escalate tensions, especially with Poland and Baltic states.
Al-Qaeda was formed in the late 1980s in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. It was led by Osama bin Laden and aimed to attack US interests. After 9/11, the US invaded Afghanistan to remove al-Qaeda and the Taliban regime harboring them. While the Taliban was removed from power, al-Qaeda and insurgent groups remain active as the US struggles to establish a stable democratic government in Afghanistan amid ongoing issues like a resilient Taliban, drug trafficking, and a difficult mountainous terrain.
This document provides summaries of multiple short essays about oil and natural gas wars. It discusses the geopolitical significance of energy agreements between China, Russia, and Kazakhstan that reduce Chinese dependence on the Persian Gulf. It describes the Shanghai Cooperation Organization as a challenge to NATO that could control over 60% of the world's natural gas if Iran and Turkmenistan join. It also summarizes arguments about the U.S.-Russia energy war and the strategic importance of Iran's natural gas reserves, as well as providing context on three wars related to the construction of the Baku-Ceyhan pipeline.
The document provides an overview of Afghanistan's economy following the fall of the Taliban regime in 2001. It discusses the country's reliance on international aid, the contributions of key economic sectors like agriculture and services, growth in GDP, high budget deficits, inflation rates, and trade balances. Afghanistan remains heavily dependent on foreign assistance, though economic conditions and several indicators like GDP have improved significantly since the early 2000s due to large amounts of international funding and investment.
Albpetrol is a state-owned company in Albania that produces and trades oil and gas and holds licenses for transportation and distribution of natural gas. The chairman presented on Albpetrol's assets, capital, employees, income and profit. Production of oil in Albania from 1929-2014 was shown. Albpetrol has partnerships with international oil companies for 16 oil fields under production sharing agreements. The privatization process for Albpetrol was started in 2015 and will not include management of exploration blocks or the transportation license.
Since 1978, Afghanistan has experienced nearly constant conflict, beginning with the Soviet invasion and installation of a communist government. Throughout the 1980s, mujahideen resistance fighters received support from the U.S. and others to combat Soviet forces. After the Soviet withdrawal in 1989, the mujahideen took control but then fractured and fought amongst each other, leading to civil war. The Taliban emerged in the 1990s and established control over most of the country, except for the northern alliance. In 2001, U.S.-led forces removed the Taliban from power following the 9/11 attacks, but conflict has continued as the Taliban wages an insurgency against the U.S.-backed Afghan government.
The document discusses the complex situation in Afghanistan and its implications for Pakistan's security. It analyzes the external dynamics affecting Afghanistan and areas of friction with Pakistan. It outlines 3 possible future scenarios for Afghanistan - a stable democratic state, a divided country along ethnic lines, or a period of political reconciliation after continued instability. The document recommends that Pakistan adopt a more proactive policy to promote peace, strengthen economic cooperation and diplomatic engagement, while addressing issues like the Durand Line dispute in a nuanced manner to safeguard its national interests.
The document provides information about Afghanistan, including its location, flight times from India, major airlines flying to Afghanistan, president, climate, languages, population, currency, exports/imports, GDP breakdown, religion, sports, and current challenges. Afghanistan faces many challenges as it tries to rebuild after years of war, such as high poverty rates with limited access to water, sanitation, and electricity, as well as low education rates with attendance constrained by a lack of teachers and cultural barriers for girls.
1) Afghanistan has a long history as a crossroads between civilizations and was conquered by many empires over centuries before becoming an independent state in the 18th century.
2) The country experienced periods of internal conflict and instability throughout the 19th and 20th centuries and was invaded by Britain in the 1830s. It gained full independence in 1919.
3) The Taliban rose to power in the 1990s and imposed strict Islamic rule until being overthrown by U.S. forces in 2001 following the 9/11 terrorist attacks carried out by Al Qaeda while sheltered in Afghanistan.
The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan from 1979 to 1989 ultimately ended in stalemate, with the Soviets forced to withdraw after heavy losses. The invasion was an attempt to spread communism and create a friendly eastern state, but faced resistance from conservative Muslim Afghans opposed to Marxist rule. Guerilla warfare by Afghan mujahideen fighters weakened the Soviets over time and drove them to withdraw in 1989, though Afghanistan remained unstable. The costly war contributed to the decline and fall of the Soviet Union.
1) The Berlin Congress of 1878 reorganized the Balkan states after the Russian-Turkish war, with Serbia, Montenegro and Greece expanding, Romania and Bulgaria gaining independence from the Ottomans, and Bosnia and Herzegovina coming under Austria's sphere of influence.
2) By the late 19th century, nationalism and imperialism had caused intense competition between European powers over territory, resources, and influence, establishing systems of opposing alliances.
3) The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand by a Serbian nationalist in 1914 provided the spark that led Austria-Hungary to declare war on Serbia, drawing the rest of Europe into World War I through the web of alliances.
The document summarizes several long-term causes of World War 1, including the alliance system between European powers which polarized them, the naval and arms races which increased tensions, and crises in Morocco and the Balkans over the preceding decades which exacerbated existing rivalries. The network of alliances tied countries together militarily, yet also heightened the risk that a conflict between two countries could engulf all major powers in Europe. Repeated crises failed to resolve tensions and instead reinforced the resolve of countries like Germany, Russia, and Serbia to confront opposing powers or allies.
This document provides details about World War 1, including its causes, key events, and outcome. It discusses the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serb nationalist, which increased tensions between Austria-Hungary and Serbia. When Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, their allies were pulled into the war due to the system of alliances. The war resulted in huge losses and stalemate on the Western Front. It also discusses America's entry into the war in 1917 and the Russian Revolution, which led to the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. After the war, the Treaty of Versailles established the League of Nations and imposed penalties on Germany.
1. In the early 20th century, rising nationalism and imperial ambitions increased tensions between European powers as they rapidly expanded their armed forces and formed complex alliances. 2. Germany felt surrounded by the Franco-Russian alliance and threatened by Britain's naval dominance, fueling German militarism. 3. Long-simmering ethnic and nationalist tensions in the Balkans, combined with the authoritarian and unstable governments prevalent in Europe, created a volatile environment that increased the likelihood of war.
New imperialism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries led European powers to compete for colonies in Africa and Asia, creating tensions. These tensions were demonstrated in the First and Second Moroccan Crises between France and Germany over influence in Morocco. While they did not directly cause World War I, new imperialism and the resulting economic and strategic rivalries helped strengthen alliances like the Entente Cordiale and the alliance between Germany and Austria-Hungary. These shifting alliances transformed local conflicts into a global war.
The document discusses several factors that contributed to the outbreak of World War 1 in 1914, including nationalism, imperial rivalries, the alliance system, and militarism in Europe. Nationalist movements in the Balkans threatened the stability of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The system of alliances between European powers divided them into two armed camps and heightened tensions. Imperial competition over colonies and economic influence also increased distrust between nations. By 1914, heavily militarized European states viewed war as an acceptable means to resolve disputes, making conflict more likely.
The document provides an overview of objectives for understanding World War I, including identifying the characteristics of Europe in the late 1800s/early 1900s, the main causes of WWI, the countries and alliances, and what fighting was like in the trenches. Key events that led to WWI are described, such as the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand igniting war after Austria-Hungary issued an ultimatum to Serbia and the alliances pulled additional countries into the conflict. Life in the trenches is summarized, mentioning weapons, trench layout, and conditions of trench warfare.
World War 1 began after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serbian nationalist in 1914. This caused tensions between Serbia and Austria-Hungary that escalated when Austria-Hungary issued an ultimatum to Serbia and declared war after Serbia did not comply. The war involved two opposing alliances - the Allies including Britain, France, and Russia, and the Central Powers including Germany and Austria-Hungary. It resulted in huge losses and new military technologies led to trench warfare stalemates on the Western Front. The war ended in 1918 with the defeat of the Central Powers after the US joined the Allies and revolutions in Russia. The Treaty of Versailles established peace and punished Germany.
The document discusses several key topics related to World War 1, including nationalism, militarism, imperialism, and the roles of new technologies like trenches, machines guns, tanks, airplanes and chemical weapons. It provides context on the rising nationalism in countries like Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia and the Balkan states. It also describes the system of alliances between European powers and how militarism and imperialism contributed to rising tensions between nations in the early 20th century.
World War 1 was caused by rising nationalism in European nations and imperial competition that increased tensions and led to a system of opposing alliances. By 1914 the tensions had reached a breaking point. When Archduke Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary was assassinated by a Serbian nationalist, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia with support from Germany. This pulled the allied countries of Russia, France and Britain into the war against the Central Powers of Germany and Austria-Hungary, starting World War 1.
By watching this slide show u will be amazed.and one can be able to score full on the topic the exact ppt same as in the textbooks of maharashtra state board 2015...
The document summarizes the decline and fall of the Ottoman Empire over several centuries. It began with the failed Siege of Vienna in 1529, which halted Ottoman expansion into central Europe. The naval defeat at Lepanto in 1571 ended Ottoman dominance at sea. Other factors included ineffective sultans, the rise of nationalist sentiments within subject territories, and increasing European imperialism and geopolitical interests in Ottoman lands. By the early 1900s, the Ottomans were weakened and in debt, leading to their alliance with Germany in World War 1 and the subsequent dissolution of the Ottoman Empire after defeat.
The document summarizes the various long term and underlying causes that contributed to the start of World War 1 in 1914. Key causes discussed include alliances between European powers that pulled them into war once it began, imperialism and competition for colonies that increased tensions, growing militarism as nations strengthened their armed forces, rising nationalism in various countries, and international crises prior to the war such as those related to Bosnia and Morocco that increased political instability in the decades leading up to the war.
Georg franz willing - the origins of the second world war - journal of histor...RareBooksnRecords
This document provides background on the origins of World War 1 and 2. It argues that both wars were part of the same era of European conflict caused by industrialization and capitalist imperialism in the 19th century. Rising powers like Germany challenged British dominance, fueling tensions. Alliances between European nations solidified before World War 1, in which Serbia helped spark conflict that drew in other powers. The postwar peace treaties contributed to tensions that led to World War 2.
1. The document discusses the origins of World War 1 from 1871-1914, focusing on the unification of Germany and rising tensions between the European powers.
2. It describes how Germany's defeat of France in 1871 led to French desires for revenge, and an arms race between France and Germany. The rise of Kaiser Wilhelm II in 1888 further increased tensions in Europe.
3. By the early 20th century, Europe was divided into two alliance systems - the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy, and the Triple Entente of France, Russia, and Britain. Rising tensions over naval power and conflicts in the Balkans set the stage for World War 1.
World War I was caused by rising nationalism in European nations and their competition for power and resources, which led to the formation of opposing alliances. Militarism and an arms race escalated tensions as countries expanded their armed forces. Immediate causes of the war included the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serbian nationalist and the chain reaction of countries honoring their alliance obligations by declaring war on each other. Within a month, the major European powers were at war across both Western and Eastern fronts.
The document discusses the tensions between European powers in the decades leading up to World War 1. It describes how nationalism was growing and how countries like Germany and Italy sought to establish themselves on the global stage. It also discusses the system of alliances that tied countries together, such as the Triple Alliance between Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy, and the Triple Entente between Britain, France and Russia. While tensions were mounting, countries did not expect the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand to lead to a major continental war.
Similar to The First World War for Oil 1914-1918: Similarities with the 2014 Oil Wars 100 Years Later (20)
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series) The Acolyte. Learn about the influence of the program on the Star Wars world, as well as new characters and story twists.
04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
The First World War for Oil 1914-1918: Similarities with the 2014 Oil Wars 100 Years Later
1. The First World For Oil
1914
Similarities with the 2014
Oil Wars 100 Years Later
Iakovos Alhadeff
Published at Smashwords
2. Table of Contents
Introduction
The British and German Empires
The Triple Alliance Between England, France and Russia
The Role of the Balkan Countries in WWI
Arab Nationalism
The Oil Factor in the First World War
The Second World War for Oil 1939-1945
Similarities of WWI with the Oil Wars of 2014
The Famous Phrase ‘History is Repeating Itself’
3. Introduction
With this essay I want to provide a summary of why oil was the main
cause of the First World War (1914-1918), which could be also called the
First World War for oil, and also compare this oil war with the oil wars of
2014 one hundred years later. The main alliances of WW1 were England,
France and Russia on one side, known as the ‘allies’, and Germany,
Austro-Hungary and Italy on the other side, known as the “central
powers”. See the following, very rough, map.
The British and German Empires
At the beginning of the 20th century (1900) England was what the U.S.A.
is today. England was an empire extending from Canada and East Africa,
to India and Australia, covering most of the globe as you can see on the
following rough map (green colour).
4. However after her victory against France in 1871, Germany established
itself as one of the great powers, and with its rampant industry she
became England’s main competitor. In a sense Germany was for England
what China is for the U.S.A. today. The most important problem in the
Anglo-German relations was Germany’s wish to extend her influence to
the Persian Gulf through the Ottoman Empire.
5. Even though the shaky Ottoman Empire had lost most of her lands, she
was still extending to the Persian Gulf through what today are Syria, Iraq
and Saudi Arabia (parts of the green area on the above map). The alliance
between the German Empire, the Empire of Austro-Hungary, Bulgaria
and the Ottoman Empire, was a great threat for the English interests.
As you can see from my rough (red) diagram, the alliance between
Germany, Austro-Hungary, Bulgaria and Ottoman Empire, would form a
6. solid block extending from Germany to the Persian Gulf, since Syria and
Iraq were Ottoman territories. A large part of the Balkans was also part of
the Ottoman Empire at the time, and it was possible for the German
Empire to connect to the Ottoman Empire and the Persian Gulf through
Austro-Hungary, as you can see on the following 1912 map of the
Balkans.
The Balkans in 1912
The above situation was a threat for the control of the Persian Gulf, which
is the richest region in the world in terms of oil reserves, it was a threat
for the control of the Caspian Region, which is the second richest region
in the world in terms of oil reserves, and which was controlled by the
Russians, it was a threat for India, which was England’s most important
colony, and it would also bring the Germans very close to the Suez Canal
and Egypt as you can see on the following map.
7. The Suez Canal and Egypt were under British Control, and were crucial
for the control of India in South Asia, since the Suez Canal was cutting
almost in half the distance between England and India. The Suez Canal
(black circle) was inaugurated a few decades earlier (1869).
8. The Triple Alliance Between England, France and Russia
Facing the rising German influence in the Middle East, the English tried
and managed to close their long and significant disputes with the French
and the Russians, in order to form an alliance against the Germans and
their allies. The major disputes between the French and the English
concerned their colonies in Africa (see the following map).
9. At the beginning of WW1, France was controlling almost all of West
Africa (yellow colour), and England was controlling almost all of East
Africa (red colour), and therefore Africa was a source of disputes
between the English and the French.
However when confronted with the German ‘threat’, the French and the
English rushed to close their disputes with a series of agreements known
as ‘Entente Cordial’. As you can read at the following Wikipedia link,
with Entente Cordial in 1904, England and France closed 1000 years of
disputes and wars.
10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entente_cordiale
Among other things, with this agreement England accepted France’s
control over Morocco, which was crucial for controlling the Straits of
Gibraltar, and France accepted England’s control over Egypt, which was
crucial for controlling the Suez Canal (see lines 1 and 2 on the following
map).
Moreover, with their alliance with the English and the Russians, the
French were hoping to take their revenge for their defeat from the
11. Germans in 1871, and regain control of the rich in iron and coal area of
Alsace and Lorraine, which was lost during this war. Coal was in the 19th
Century what oil became in the 20th Century, and even the navies were
using coal, until coal was finally replaced by oil in the early 20th Century
(1900). Indeed after the defeat of the Germans in 1918, the French
regained control of Alsace and Lorraine.
Moreover, with the Sykes-Picot Agreement, the English promised that in
case of victory they would offer the French some of the Ottoman Empire
territories. According to this agreement, England would take the oil rich
Iraq, and France would take Syria. Actually there was no Iraq and Syria
at the time. The Ottoman territory that would be taken by the English
with this agreement was later given the name ‘Iraq’, and the Ottoman
territory that would be taken by the French with the same agreement was
later given the name ‘Syria’.
This is the reason that the members of the ISIS army (Islamic State of
Iraq and Syria) are saying that they are destroying the Sykes-Picot
Agreement by reuniting Syria and Iraq. You can see the Sykes-Picot
Agreement on the following rough map.
12. You can also read about the Sykes-Picot Agreement at the following
Wikipedia link.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sykes%E2%80%93Picot_Agreement
Moreover with the Anglo-Russian Entente in 1907, the English and the
Russians closed their centuries’ long disputes for the control of Central
Asia and the Middle East (Iran, Afghanistan and Tibet). You can read at
the following Wikipedia link, that in 1907, the English and the Russians
agreed to split Iran, Afghanistan and Tibet in spheres of influence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Russian_Entente
The agreement between the English and the Russians allowed them to
stop antagonizing each other and turn their attention to the Germans and
13. the Ottomans who were a threat for the control of the Persian Gulf and
the Caspian Sea.
However from their alliance with the French and the English, the
Russians did not simply expect to protect the oil rich Caspian Sea region
from the German and Ottoman threat, but were also hoping to gain
control of Constantinople, the Bosphorus Straits and the Dardanelles,
which were controlled by the Ottomans, and which would give the
Russians uninterrupted access to the Aegean and the Mediterranean Seas
(see maps below).
14. At the following Wikipedia link you can read that with the
Constantinople Agreement, the English, the French and the Russians,
agreed that in case of victory, Russia would take control of
Constantinople, the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantinople_Agreement
However even though the allies did finally win the war, Russia did not
get Constantinople (today Istanbul), because Russia collapsed in 1917
and exited the war, since she entered a painful civil war between the
tsarists and the Communists.
By agreeing with the Russians to split Iran into spheres of influence, the
English would gain control of the Persian Gulf while the Russians would
retain the undisputed control of the Caspian Sea, and together they could
fight the Germans and the Ottomans. You can see on the following map
that Iran is the region between the Persian Gulf and the Caspian Sea,
holding itself a very large amount of oil and natural gas reserves. Iran is
15. the second and fourth richest country in the world in terms of natural gas
and oil reserves respectively.
However at the time most of the region’s oil was coming from Iraq and
Baku, since oil in Iran was only discovered in 1908.
The Anglo-Franco and the Anglo-Russian alliances, together with the
Franco-Russian alliance, encircled Germany and her allies (see following
rough map).
16. The Role of the Balkan Countries in WWI
One of the reasons there was so much tension in the Balkans before the
outbreak of World War 1, was that the Balkans was the connection
between Germany and her allies with the Ottoman Empire and the
Persian Gulf. The following map shows the Balkans before the Balkan
Wars of 1912-1913.
17. The Balkans Before the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913
It can be seen on the above map, that with the status quo that existed
before the Balkan Wars of 1912 and 1913, Germany would have no
problem to connect to the Persian Gulf by railway, using the Austro-
Hungary-Ottoman Empire corridor.
However with the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913, Greece, Serbia, Bulgaria
and Albania, managed to annex almost all the European territories of the
Ottoman Empire. Greece, Serbia and Romania, all of which were on the
side of the allies during the First World War, formed a wall between
Germany and the Ottoman Empire as you can see on the following map,
(Bulgaria finally entered the war on Germany’s side in WWI).
18. The Balkans after the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913
The German plan was to construct the famous Baghdad Railway, that
would connect Berlin to the Persian Gulf (see later sections), and Greece,
Serbia and Romania were forming a wall against the Baghdad Railway
Project. It is not a coincidence that World War I broke out on the 28th of
July 1914, with the Austro-Hungary declaring war to Serbia, with all
other countries running behind these two countries. The following map
shows the Balkans today.
19. It can also not be a coincidence that the Balkan Wars took place in 1912
and 1913, and the First World War broke out in 1914. When I am saying
that the Balkan Wars were not a coincidence, I do not mean that Greece,
Serbia and Bulgaria attacked the Ottoman Empire because they wanted to
prevent Germany from connecting to the Persian Gulf. These countries
did want the Ottoman territories, and they were supported by England,
Russia and France, in order to prevent the German-Ottoman connection.
The Ottoman territories were simply their rewards.
As you can read in section ‘Reaction Among the Great Powers During the
Wars’ of the following Wikipedia link, Germany was already heavily
involved in the internal politics of the Ottoman Empire, and officially
opposed the attack on the Ottoman Empire, but because it was obvious
that the shaky Ottoman Empire could not protect for long her European
territories from Greece, Bulgaria and Serbia, Germany was supporting
20. Bulgaria from the opposite camp, which was called the ‘Balkan League’’.
And in the end, Bulgaria did indeed join Germany’s camp in WW1.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balkan_Wars#Reactions_among_the_Great
_Powers_during_the_wars
In the same Wikipedia link, you can also read that Russia was the
primary mover of the Balkan League countries i.e. Greece, Serbia and
Bulgaria against the Ottoman Empire. This seems very natural, since
Russia not only wanted to prevent Germany from obtaining access to the
Caspian Sea, but she was also a traditional enemy of the Ottoman Empire
and wanted to gain control of Constantinople, Bosphorus and the
Dardanells, which would allow the Russian Navy to access the
Mediterranean Sea, as I already said.
You can also read in the same Wikipedia link that Austria-Hungary was
totally opposed to the advancement of the Balkan countries, Greece,
Serbia and Bulgaria, in the region. France, a Russian ally, informed
Russia that she was not ready for a war. England, even though a
21. supporter of the Ottoman Empire, encouraged the advancement of the
Balkan countries. That’s what Wikipedia says about the reactions of the
Great Powers during the Balkan Wars of 1912 and 1913.
We therefore see that Germany and Russia were supporting the sides we
would expect them to support in the Balkan Wars. However things were a
bit more complicated for England. Because on one hand England was
facing the threat of German expansion to the Persian Gulf and India, and
on the other hand she was facing the threat of Russian expansion through
the Straits of Bosphorus and the Dardanelles to the Mediterranean Sea,
which could pose a threat for the sea corridor between the Mediterranean
22. Sea and the Indian Ocean i.e. the Suez Canal and the Red Sea.
23. The following map depicts the situation for the English. The purple
arrows represent the German threat to the Persian Gulf and India, and the
red arrows represent the Russian threat to the Suez Canal.
The German threat for the English (purple lines), and the Russian threat for the English (red lines)
England perceived the collapsing Ottoman Empire as less dangerous than
the Russian Navy for the control of the Suez Canal and Egypt. However
in the end, under the German threat for the Persian Gulf and India,
England accepted Russian control over the straits of Bosphorous and the
24. Dardanelles in case of victory. With the Constantinople Agreement as I
already said, France, England and Russia agreed on the control of
Constantinople and the Straits by Russia.
Another factor that helped England and Russia to reach an agreement was
that around 1880, England had taken control of Cyprus, Egypt and the
Suez Canal, and was feeling more confident that it could prevent the
Russians from taking control of the Suez Canal.
Before I close the section on the Balkans, I must mention that the ‘wall’
formed by Greece and Serbia in 1914 against Germany and the Baghdad
Railway, which prevented the Germans from connecting by railway to the
Ottoman Empire and the Persian Gulf, was still there 80 years later.
Greece and Serbia, two traditional Russian allies, were forming a wall in
the 90’s against the Americans and the Europeans, who wanted to bring
oil and natural gas from Azerbaijan to the Adriatic Sea and Italy through
the AMBO pipeline.
The Greek-Serbian wall was broken first by the creation of the state of
FYROM (Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) in 1991, and by the
NATO war on Serbia and the autonomy of Kosovo in South Serbia on
1998 (see following map). You can read more about the NATO attack on
Serbia and the AMBO pipeline in my essay ‘The NATO attack in
Yugoslavia – Another Energy War’.
25. Arab Nationalism
While in the Balkans the Russians were helping the Greeks, the Serbs and
the Bulgarians to attack the Ottoman Empire and annex her territories, in
order to prevent the Germans from connecting to the Ottoman Empire
through the Baghdad railway, and in order to gain control of
Constantinople, the English were organizing an Arab revolt against the
Ottomans.
The English were organizing the Arabs at the Southern parts of the
Ottoman Empire, the regions that today are Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Syria,
in order to push the Ottomans away from the Persian Gulf. Therefore we
see that the allies were helping the local populations both at the Balkans
26. and in the Arab world, in order to turn them against the Ottomans and
prevent Germany to connect to the Persian Gulf through the Baghdad
railway. For the Arab revolt, 1916-1918, see the following Wikipedia
link.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Revolt
Therefore by supporting Balkan Nationalism, the allies managed to block
the connection between the German and Ottoman Empires (black line),
and at the same time, by supporting Arab nationalism in Syria and Iraq,
they managed to block the connection between the Ottoman Empire and
the Persian gulf (red line).
27. The Oil Factor in the First World War
From all the above it can be said that the main cause of World War I was
the Germans’ wish to use the Ottoman corridor in order to expand to the
Middle East, which threatened the British interests in the Middle East and
India. The importance of oil can be also seen from the fact that the
English, the French and the Russians that had centuries’ long disputes,
managed to put these disputes aside, in order to form an alliance against
the rise of Germany.
It is of course no coincidence that just before the outbreak of the First
World War, oil engines had started replacing coal engines, dramatically
increasing the geopolitical importance of the oil rich regions. Note that
both England and Germany were very rich in coal but very poor in oil. At
the following Wikipedia link, at section ‘Lord of the Admiralty’, you can
read that in 1911 Winston Churchill, as the head of the British Navy,
ordered the replacement of the coal engines with oil engines, something
that would soon become the norm for all navies and armies, making the
20th Century the century of oil. The use of oil would ensure greater speed
for the British Naval ships. Moreover smoke would stop exposing their
position.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winston_Churchill#First_Lord_of_the_Ad
miralty
The Baghdad Railway
Since the Baghdad Railway was a very important German project for the
connection of Germany with the Persian Gulf (see red line on the
following map) I must say a few words about it.
28.
29. Note! Even thought the Baghdad Railway would follow the route of what today is Germany- Czech
Rep-Austria-Hungary-Serbia-Bulgaria-Turkey-Syria-Iraq, and would pass from Baghdad and Basra,
my red lines on the maps are rough and not exact lines.
For some people the Baghdad Railway was the real cause of the First
World War, since it is this very railway that would connect Germany to
the Persian Gulf, also bringing Germany close to India. I think it seems
more appropriate to consider Germany’s wish to expand to the Persian
Gulf as the cause of the war, than to consider the Baghdad Railway as the
cause of the war.
What was important was the decision of the Germans to expand to the
Persian Gulf, not the actual way they would do so. Whether this
connection would be achieved by the Baghdad Railway or some other
means, it seems to be of secondary importance. However nobody can
deny that the Baghdad Railway was very important, and therefore I will
provide some Wikipedia sources to demonstrate that this is so.
You can read at the following Wikipedia link that the construction of the
Baghdad Railway started in 1903 and was completed in 1940, and its aim
30. was to connect the German Empire to the Persian Gulf, because the
Germans wanted to acquire control of a port in the Persian Gulf. Please
note that the project started in 1903, and the English and the French
closed their differences with the Entente Cordiale in 1904, and the
English and the Russians closed their differences in 1907.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baghdad_Railway
At the end of the 3rd paragraph of the following Wikipedia link, you can
read that the Germans had managed to obtain ownership of some oil
fields in Iraq, and with a railway to Basra they could obtain oil supplies
while avoiding the sea lanes and the Suez Canal, where the British Navy
was dominant. At the same time, they could use the Persian Gulf to
export their products to Asian countries.
Therefore this railway would have two roles. The first one would be to
supply the German industry and the German army with oil, and the
second to transport the German products to the Persian Gulf, and from the
Persian Gulf to export them to the Asian countries, India included.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baghdad_Railway
More specifically, according to Wikipedia:
“The Germans gained access to and ownership of oil fields in Iraq, and
with a line to the port of Basra would have gained better access to the
eastern parts of the German colonial empire, by avoiding the Suez
Canal”.
31. In the beginning of the 4th paragraph of the following link, you can read
that the Baghdad Railway had become a source of tension in the years
before WW1.
“The railway became a source of international disputes during the years
immediately preceding World War”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baghdad_Railway
In the first paragraph of the following Wikipedia link, in section
‘Overview’, you can read that the Baghdad Railway would offer the
German Empire safe access to oil by avoiding the British Navy.
https :// en . wikipedia . org / wiki / Baghdad _ Railway # Overview
At the second paragraph of the same Wikipedia link, you can read that the
Baghdad Railway was also a threat to Russia, since it would offer the
German Empire access to the Caucasus Mountain. Caucasus is located
next to the oil rich Caspian Sea region, which was controlled by the
Russians.
https :// en . wikipedia . org / wiki / Baghdad _ Railway # Overview
32. Moreover in the beginning of the 4th paragraph of the following
Wikipedia link, it is mentioned that as early as 1871, geologists had
already discovered rich and high quality oil fields in the area of
Mesopotamia (Iraq), which was at the time part of the Ottoman Empire.
https :// en . wikipedia . org / wiki / Baghdad _ Railway # Overview
At the paragraph before the last one in the following Wikipedia link, you
can read that as early as 1903 there was unrest in France, England and
Russia for the beginning of the Baghdad Railway.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baghdad_Railway#The_Baghdad_Concessio
n
In the first line of section ‘After the War’ of the following Wikipedia
link, you can read that after the end of WW1, with the Treaty of
Versailles, Germany was stripped from the ownership of the Baghdad
Railway (Deutsche Bank was a larger investor in this project).
http :// en . wikipedia . org / wiki / Baghdad _ Railway # After _ the _ war
33. In the last line of the 3rd paragraph of the following Wikipedia link, you
can read that there were negotiations between the English and the
Germans before WW1 regarding the Baghdad Railway, and the Germans
had agreed to allow some Englishmen in the board of directors, in order
to ensure that the railway would not rich the Persian Gulf.
This is actually the reason that some people believe that this railway was
not the cause of WW1, since the Germans and the English had an
agreement about it. However I do not think that a paper agreement would
make the English and the Russians feel very secure.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_World_War_I#International_rel
ations
And like if all these disputes for the Iraqi and the Baku oil were not
enough, in 1908 oil was discovered in Iran too, as you can read in the
following Wikipedia link, further increasing the geopolitical importance
of the region.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Persian_Oil_Company
If you wonder why Saudi Arabia, which is the king of oil, is not
mentioned at all in my essay, it is because the first important oil field of
Saudi Arabia was discovered in 1938. As you can see on the following
map, at the beginning of WW1 the interior of the Arabian Peninsula
(Saudi Arabia) was not controlled by any great power since oil had not
been discovered yet. The Ottomans and the English were only controlling
its outer parts which were important for controlling the sea lanes.
34. As you can read in section ‘Before the discovery of oil’ of the following
Wikipedia link, the consensus at the beginning of the 20th Century (1900),
was that there was not oil in the Arabian Peninsula.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_oil_industry_in_Saudi_Ara
bia
As you can read in section ‘Discovery of Oil’ of the following Wikipedia
link, oil was finally discovered in Saudi Arabia in 1938.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_oil_industry_in_Saudi_Ara
bia
The Second World War for Oil 1939-1945
The Second World War for oil cannot be considered as an independent
event from the First World War for oil. After wining the war, the allies
imposed extremely hard conditions on Germany. The German people
suffered, and this led a lunatic to power, and as soon as Germany was
35. strong enough she stroke back. According to historians, the decisive
battle of WWII was the Battle of Stalingrad (blue circle). Stalingrad was
later renamed to Volgograd.
As you can see on the map, if Hitler had won in Stalingrad, he would
have marched to Baku, and he would have secured oil reserves for his
army. Today we can easily go to a gas station and get fuels, so it is
difficult to imagine that an army can actually run out of fuel. And yet it
was very often the case for whole army divisions to run out of fuels in the
Great Wars. And it was the allies that were controlling both the Caspian
and the Middle East oil.
If Hitler had taken control of Baku, he would have oil supplies to launch
a Panzer attack to the Middle East. And if he had won the English in the
Middle East, the war in Europe and North Africa would be over. This is
the reason that the battle of Stalingrad is considered as one of the most
decisive battles of WWII.
36. It seems strange that Hitler turned against Stalin and the Soviet Union, his
former ally in 1941, since until then it was the Communists who were
supplying the Germans with the oil and minerals they badly needed. As
you can read in section “Later Events and Total Trade”, of the following
Wikipedia link, the Communists supplied the Nazis with 900.000 tons of
oil in the period 1940-1941, that is before the Nazi attack on Russia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German
%E2%80%93Soviet_Credit_Agreement_(1939)
At the end of the first paragraph of the same Wikipedia link, you can read
the following:
“The Soviets fulfilled their obligations to the letter right up until the
invasion, wanting to avoid provoking Germany. All these agreements
were terminated when Germany invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941,
in violation of the treaties between the two countries.”
However the oil that the Communists were supplying was not enough for
Hitler who was fighting a global war, and he needed total control of the
Baku oil. The Nazis were not crazy to terminate the Nazi-Communist
alliance which would mean a giant enemy on their east. They simply
needed more oil than the Communists were supplying.
In the second paragraph of the following encyclopedia.com link, you can
read that according to the Nazi-Communist Economic Agreement that
was signed on the 20th of August of 1939 by Karl Schnurre and
Yevgeny Babarin, the Communists would supply the Nazis with raw
37. materials i.e. oil, wood, manganese etc, and the Nazis would supply the
Communists with manufactured goods.
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3404101270.html
You can read about how the Communists were feeding the Nazi war
machine at the Marxist site www.marxist.org, at the following link.
http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/writers/vance/1941/01/russia1.htm
In the 5th paragraph of the following article of The Guardian, you can read
the following:
“The pact eventually extended to the economic sphere, with Germany
providing military equipment in exchange for raw materials such as oil,
grain, iron and phosphates”.
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/aug/06/devils-alliance-hitlers-pact-
stalin-1938-1941-roger-moorhouse-review
For the importance of the Nazi Communist Economic Agreement, you
can also read the article of the historian Heinrich Schwendemann,
“German-Soviet Economic Relations at the Time of the Hitler-Stalin Pact
1939-1941”, at the following address:
http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/cmr_1252-
6576_1995_num_36_1_2425
38. Similarities of WWI with the Oil Wars of 2014
Today, 100 years after the First World War for oil in 1914, we see the oil
and natural gas wars in Syria and Iraq, in Ukraine and in Libya, and we
can assume that nothing has changed. The wars in Libya, Ukraine, Iraq
and Syria, are the first flames of the Third World War for oil, and of
course everybody hopes that these first flames will not become a big fire
like it happened in the previous World Wars for oil. However since the
current wars take place in three continents, i.e. Ukraine in Europe, Iraq
and Syria in Asia, and Libya in Africa, we can assume that we are already
in a mini World War for oil.
The situation in the Persian Gulf and the Caspian Sea is very similar to
the situation in these regions in 1914. The difference is that the
Americans have replaced the English, and the Chinese have replaced the
Germans. In WW1 it was the British Navy that was dominating the seas,
and it was Germany that was trying to exploit its geographical advantage
in order to avoid the British Navy and connect to the oil rich region
through the Ottoman Empire and the Baghdad Railway, since Germany
was much closer than England to the Persian Gulf and the Caspian Sea
(black line).
39. Today, instead of Germany, it is China that is trying to exploit its
geographical advantage in order to circumvent the American Navy and
connect to the Persian Gulf, except that due to technological
advancements the Chinese are not using railways but oil and natural gas
pipelines.
The Chinese have already connected to the Caspian Sea by a pipeline
network that connects China to the rich in oil Kazakhstan and the rich in
natural gas Turkmenistan (red lines), and they are trying to construct a
pipeline network that will connect China to Iran and the Persian Gulf.
The war in Afghanistan is definitely relevant to the Chinese effort to
connect to Iran and the Persian Gulf, since Afghanistan is very poor in oil
and natural gas. What makes Afghanistan important is its position
between Iran and China (see my essays ‘The 21st Century War for Iran’s
Oil’ and ‘Why the U.S.A. Invaded Afghanistan’ for more information on
the connection between China and Iran).
40. The other similarity between the First World War for oil in 1914 and the
2014 oil wars is the Baghdad Railway and the Qatar-Turkey Pipeline. In
1914 Germany wanted to construct the Baghdad Railway in order to
connect to the Persian Gulf and obtain oil, but Greece and Serbia were
blocking her. Or to be more accurate nobody was blocking her, since the
European territories of the Ottoman Empire bordered Austro-Hungary,
but with the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913, the English and the Russians
helped Greece and Serbia to absorb the European territories of the
Ottoman Empire in order to block the Baghdad Railway that would
connect Germany to the Ottoman Empire and the Persian Gulf (black
line).
In 2014, actually earlier since the war in Syria started in 2011, Qatar and
Turkey wanted to construct a Sunni natural gas pipeline that would
41. transport Qatari natural gas to Europe through Turkey (red line), but the
Shiite Iraq and Syria were blocking this pipeline, and as a result the wars
in Iraq and Syria broke out. The wars in Iraq and Syria also broke out to
prevent the Shiite pipeline (green line), which would transport Iranian oil
and natural gas to the Mediterranean Sea through Iraq and Syria (see my
essay ‘The Energy War Between U.S.A. and Russia).
We therefore see that everything is almost the same. Serbia and Greece
were blocking the Baghdad Railway in 1914, and Austro-Hungary
declared war on Serbia in 1914, while in 2011 the Shiite Iraq and Syria
were blocking the Qatar-Turkey pipeline and were promoting the Iran-
Iraq-Syria pipeline, and the wars in Syria and Iraq broke out. Therefore
the wars that broke out in Syria and Iraq in 2011, have a lot of
resemblance to the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913.
The story is the same for Russia too. Russia has always been invading
and controlling the countries around the Caspian Sea. This region was
under Russian occupation during the Russian Empire era i.e. during the
tsarist Russia, and nothing changed during the Communist era.
42. Former Soviet Union Map
The Russian Communists kept the Caspian countries under Russian
control until the fall of the Soviet Union, as you can see on the above
map of the former Soviet Union. Actually the Caspian Region i.e.
Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan,
Tajikistan is comprised of 90% Muslim populations, which are much
more similar to the Turks rather than the Russians who are Christians.
However Russia has always been the strongest country, she has been on
the winning side in both World Wars, and therefore the oil rich Caspian
region has always been under her control. The Communists, exactly like
the tsarists, did not grant these countries independence because of the oil
43. riches of these countries, which were very important for Russia’s energy
security.
At the following Wikipedia link you can read how Russian Communists
invaded Azerbaijan in 1920.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Army_invasion_of_Azerbaijan
At the following Wikipedia link you can read how Russian Communists
invaded Georgia in 1921.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Army_invasion_of_Georgia
In section ‘Kazakhstan under Soviet Rule’ of the following Wikipedia
link, you can read the following:
“During the 1930s, many renowned Kazakh writers, thinkers, poets,
politicians and historians were killed on Stalin's orders, both as part of
the repression and as a methodical pattern of suppressing Kazakh
identity and culture”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazakhstan#Kazakhstan_under_Soviet_rule
At the following Economist’s article about Central Asia titled ‘Stalin’s
Harvest’, you can read the following:
“After the October revolution of 1917, new autonomous republics were
created. In 1924 Stalin divided the region into different Soviet republics.
The borders were drawn up rather arbitrarily without following strict
ethnic lines or even the guidelines of geography.
The main aim was to counter the growing popularity of pan-Turkism in
the region, and to avoid potential friction. Hence, the fertile Fergana
Valley (formerly ruled by the Khanate of Kokand) was divided between
44. Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Some of these borders were
redrawn several times until 1936. After 1991, this led to lively
demarcation disputes among the newly independent countries”.
http://www.economist.com/node/16377083
In the First World War for oil, the Russian tsar was trying to prevent the
Germans from approaching Baku. In the Second World War for oil, the
Russian Communists were again trying to prevent Hitler from getting the
Baku oil. Note that the very rich oil reserves of Kazakhstan were
discovered much later than the ones in Baku.
Today, in the Third World War for oil, after the collapse of the Soviet
Union, Putin is trying to keep a firm hand on the Caspian countries, in
order for Russia to have monopolistic power in the European natural gas
markets (see my essay ‘The Energy War Between U.S.A. and Russia’).
Actually the war between Russia and Georgia and the war between
Armenia and Azerbaijan were Russia’s revenge for the cooperation of
Azerbaijan and Georgia with the Americans on the Baku-Ceyhan
pipeline. To retaliate, the Americans supported the Chechens, and the
Russian Chechen war broke out (see my essay ‘The Three Wars for the
Baku-Ceyhan Pipeline’.
As you can read in the second half of following article of the Guardian,
Vladimir Putin threatened the Kazakhstan sovereignty after the Kazakh
President and dictator, Nursultan Nazabayev, threatened to quite the
Eurasian Economic Union.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/01/kazakhstan-russian-neighbour-
putin-chilly-nationalist-rhetoric
45. Here there is one more article on Putin’s pressure on Kazakhstan.
http://www.eurasianet.org/node/69771
In the First World War for oil in 1914, Russia was on the side of the
country that had the advantage in the seas i.e. Great Britain. In the Second
World War for oil in 1939, the Russians were initially on the German
side, that is on the side of the country that had the geographical
advantage, with the famous Nazi-Communist alliance which came into
effect with the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact in 1939, according to which the
Nazis and the Communists were splitting Eastern Europe into zones of
influence. For the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact see the following Wikipedia
link.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact
For the Nazi-Communist alliance you can also read the following link of
Encyclopaedia Britannica. In the third paragraph you can read the
following:
“To this public pact of nonaggression was appended a secret protocol,
also reached on August 23, 1939, which divided the whole of eastern
Europe into German and Soviet spheres of influence”.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/230972/German-Soviet-
Nonaggression-Pact
In the first paragraph of the same Britannica link, you can also read the
following:
“The Western democracies’ hesitance in opposing Adolf Hitler, along
with Stalin’s own inexplicable personal preference for the Nazis, also
played a part in Stalin’s final choice”.
46. Therefore one should not be misled to think that the Russian Tsars or the
Russian Communists were better than the Americans or the British. They
were simply located next to the richest region in oil and natural gas
reserves in the world. And Russia has many more oil and natural gas
reserves than the Caspian ones. Russia is the richest country in the world
in terms of natural gas reserves, and one of the richest countries in the
world in terms of oil reserves. Please note that the countries with the
richest reserves are not necessarily the ones with the largest production,
since production also depends on technology and other factors.
Today, in what I call the beginning of the Third World War for oil,
Russia is closely working with China, that is with the country that has the
geographical advantage, and not with U.S.A. which is the country that
dominates the seas.
The Famous Phrase ‘History is Repeating Itself’
When examining the First World War for Oil, and comparing it with the
oil wars of 2014, one tends to think about the very famous phrase which
says that history is repeating itself. We have heard this phrase so many
times that it is very difficult to examine the oil wars without thinking
about it.
However this is a very silly phrase which is used all the time by the so
called intellectuals. In reality it is not history that is repeating itself, but
rather the Persian Gulf and the Caspian Sea remaining the richest regions
in the world in terms of oil and natural gas reserves. From the beginning
of the 20th Century, when oil replaced coal, the Persian Gulf and the
Caspian Sea became the heart of the world economy.
47. On the following map it can be seen how small this region is in
comparison to the whole world. When it is taken into account that this
region holds between 50-65 per cent of the world’s oil and natural gas
reserves, it is no surprise that people have been, and will keep killing
each other around it.
48. This will not change, unless huge amounts of oil and natural gas reserves
are found somewhere else, or until oil and natural gas are replaced by
some other form of energy. Therefore the phrase “history keeps repeating
itself” must be replaced by the phrase “the Persian Gulf and the Caspian
Sea remain constant”.
The reason witticisms of the “history repeating itself” kind are always
popular, is because intellectuals do not want to explain to us what is
really happening. And one wonders why this is so, why is it that
intellectuals never help us think?
Murray Rothbard used to say that it is the responsibility of the
intellectuals to convince us that we need all these bureaucrats. I think he
is right. The responsibility of the intellectual is not to help us think, but
rather to convince us that we need the bureaucrats, because as Murray
Rothbard used to say, intellectuals have a special relationship with the
state, and most of the time they are directly financed by the state.
Therefore their job is to convince us that we cannot live without their
employer, and they are very good at it.
It is therefore very natural that intellectuals do not help us think, because
that’s not at all their job. Nowadays everybody seems to wonder where
were the intellectuals before the economic crisis? How could the
intellectuals let us fall into this crisis? However this is again a very silly
question. This crisis occurred exactly because the intellectuals did their
job very well, and they convinced us that we needed their employers i.e.
all these bureaucrats. This is how this crisis came about as I explain in my
essay ‘The Socialist Myth of Economic Bubbles’.
49. Ayn Rand used to say it should not be expected from intellectuals to be
ideologically independent since they are financially dependent on the
state and the bureaucrats. However the internet is changing all that. With
the internet we, the intellectual off springs of Murray Rothbard and Ayn
Rand, can attack the intellectuals. And they know that they do not have
the arsenal to confront us, that’s why you already hear socialist countries
planning to build their own internet networks. Russia and Latin America
want to build their own internet networks, and China does not allow its
citizens to use the internet.
Most socialists and intellectuals support such decisions. The reason is not
that they are afraid of espionage as they say. The reason is that they know
that they cannot confront us in the age of the internet. It is like a race. We
have to finish them off before they have the time to unplug us. And we
have to do it not only because it is in our interest to do so, but also
because it is extremely fun.
The problem is that the first flames of the Third World War for oil are
already here, and war is always the best excuse for statists and socialists
to take total control of a country. It is the best excuse for the state to take
over everything. It was with the First World War that American statists
destroyed the American liberal economic model of the previous centuries
and introduced the socialist ideals.