SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
14-Mar-24 WTD 1
The EYE and the Television
Display
Compiled by Wayne Dickson
SMIREE MIEAust. CPEng. Member SMPTE
in consultation with Bryan Powell of the ABC
A brief consideration of the eye’s viewing potential
and the relationship to a Television display is given.
Discussion is encouraged on this complex subject
which can only have a subjectively based
conclusion.
13 October 98
14-Mar-24 WTD 2
The Normal EYE
• What is “20/20 Vision” ?
– Being able to, at a distance of 20 feet, read a
character, eg the letter E, which is meant to be read
at a distance of 20 feet.
– The size of the letter E for example which can be
read by the eye with 20/20 vision is :
• 20/15 vision is better than 20/30 vision.
5 minutes of arc
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
14-Mar-24 WTD 3
The size of the characters
to test 20/20 vision ?
• 1 minute equals 1/60 of a degree
• This is the “normal” minimum discernible resolution for a human eye
when tested for character recognition.
20 feet
O
D
O = 1 minute
D = 2 x 20 feet x Tan (O/2)
= 0.07 inches ( 1.8mm)
Hence the letter E will be 9 mm x 9 mm if intended to be read by
a person with 20/20 vision at a distance of 20 feet or 6 metres.
14-Mar-24 WTD 4
• The eye under some conditions may provide :
– “Vernier Acuity” of 8 seconds of arc.
Eg. Offset of two lines placed end to end.
– “Detection” can go down to 1 second, maybe 0.5 second
Eg. single power lines in the sky.
• With more complex patterns like a matrix of pixels in a
colour television display, a probable best resolving
power of around 30 seconds is thought to be typical.
– Note that the eye can discriminate down to 1 % in intensity between
overlapping light sources.
– The eye has a greater resolution for vertical separated lines compared to
horizontal separated lines.
Maximum resolving power
Hence approx. 1mm differences between “objects” maybe detectable,
at a viewing distance 6 metres from a display, by a typical eye.
8 sec.
14-Mar-24 WTD 5
Maximum resolving power
related to a Display size
• With a viewing distance of 6 H (6 x height of picture) for SDTV
and 4H for HDTV, and a typical best resolving power of the eye
for a complex pattern of pixels of 30 sec. of arc, the minimum
discernible object separation is :
Display
diagonal dim.
Display
height
Minimum discernible
object separation
5”
12”
18”
22”
27”
32”
42” (16:9)
10ft (16:9)
20ft (16:9)
76 mm
183 mm
274 mm
335 mm
412 mm
488 mm
640 mm
1830 mm
3658 mm
0.07 mm
0.16 mm
0.24 mm
0.29 mm
0.36 mm
0.43 mm
0.38 mm
1.1 mm
2.1 mm
Viewing
Distance
0.5 m
1.1 m
1.6 m
2 m
2.5 m
2.9 m
2.6 m
7.3 m
14.6 m
The minimum
pixel separation
on a television
display is currently
0.21 mm for
a “Professional”
Monitor
to 0.35 mm for
a “consumer”
display.
@ 6H
@ 4H
14-Mar-24 WTD 6
“Pixel” separation in a display
4 (P)
3 (L)
D
Horizontal pixel separation
= 4*D/(P*(4^2 +3^2)^0.5)
= 4*D/(P*5)
Vertical line separation
= 3*D/(L*5)
16 (P)
9 (L)
D
Horizontal pixel separation
= 16*D/(P*(16^2 +9^2)^0.5)
=16*D/(P*(337)^0.5)
Vertical line separation
=9*D/(L*(337)^0.5)
Where P = horizontal Pixels & L = vertical Lines
14-Mar-24 WTD 7
4:3 Display
“pixel” size
4 (720)
3 (576)
18”
Horizontal pixel separation
= 0.51 mm
Vertical line separation
= 0.48 mm
4 (720)
3 (576)
27”
Horizontal pixel separation
= 0.76 mm
Vertical line separation
= 0.71 mm
The “eye” discernability is
possibly 0.36 mm @ 6H
The “eye” discernability is
possibly 0.24 mm @ 6H
14-Mar-24 WTD 8
16:9 Display
“pixel” size
16 (1920)
9 (1080)
42”
Horizontal pixel separation
= 0 .48 mm
Vertical line separation
= 0.48 mm
16 (720)
9 (576)
42”
Horizontal pixel separation
= 1.2 mm
Vertical line separation
= 1.1 mm
The “eye” discernability for a 42” display is possibly 0.4 mm @ 4H
For robustness, variable pitch is sometimes used.
14-Mar-24 WTD 9
Large 16:9 Display
“pixel” size
16 (1920)
9 (1080)
10 foot
Horizontal pixel separation Vertical line separation
= 1.4 mm = 1.4 mm
The “eye”discernability for a 10ft display is possibly 1 mm @ 4H
Note pixel count is :
2,073.600 pixels and
“dot” count is :
6,220,800 dots.
14-Mar-24 WTD 10
Pixel separation
versus
Picture resolution
R G B R G B R G B
Pixel
B
Pixel
A
Pixel
C
Pixel
B
Pixel
A
Pixel
C
Pixel separation Pixel separation
R G
G
B
R
R
B
B
G
or
Pitch of the “Resolution” lines
That is 1920 pixels horizontally gives 960 lines resolution
and 720 pixels horizontally gives 360 lines resolution
R G B
R G B
R G B
Pixel
B
Pixel
A
Pixel
C
Pixel separation
R G B
or
“Dot” “Slot” “Trinitron”
or Plasma
Mask
pattern
Horizontal
(some examples)
14-Mar-24 WTD 11
Pixel separation
versus
Picture resolution
R G B
R G B
R G B
Pixel
B
Pixel
A
Pixel
C
Line & Pixel separation Line & Pixel separation
R
G
B
R B
G
or
Pitch of the “Resolution” lines
That is 1080 pixels vertically gives 540 lines resolution
and 576 pixels vertically gives 288 lines resolution
R
G
B
Pixel
B
Pixel
A
Pixel
C
off
off
on
on
on
on
Note stripes are continuous
for a Trinitron
Vertical
(some examples)
14-Mar-24 WTD 12
Other Considerations
• The other dominant factors which may influence
whether the line structures or the increased resolutions
can actually be seen are :
– “Kel factor” associated with interlace scans. (works to decrease the observed resolution both
vertically and horizontally by 0.7 to 0.8)
– Interlace artefacts such as “pairing” in displays (H to V xtalk)
– Room lighting conditions.
– Programme material type.
– Programme production and coding artefacts
– Display structures - dot, line, rectangular, black matrix, tube, plasma etc.
– Display dynamics, persistence, dynamic focus, and shading correction.
– Viewing distance - this analysis is based on 6H for SDTV and 4H for HDTV.
– Variability of the human observer from the typical normal vision for a young observer.
14-Mar-24 WTD 13
Concluding analysis
• By analysing the eye’s potential and the display’s
“mechanics” to see if :
– the number of vertical lines is too low and hence is observable
– or the number of vertical lines is too high and is wasted
– the displayed horizontal resolution can be seen
– or the displayed horizontal resolution is below what could be resolved by
the observer
• Is the “eye” able to see the separation between the
pixels or is the eye only able to detect the separation
between alternate pixels, that is the resolution lines ?
– I suspect the answer is dependent upon the “other considerations”, in
particular the display structure and technology used.
– If the perception of the eye is 30 sec. of arc and if the variation between
adjacent pixels can be detected the followings conclusions are reached :
14-Mar-24 WTD 14
Conclusions
• The following conclusions can generally be made at a
viewing distance of 6H for SDTV and 4H for HDTV
from the display:
– A SDTV (720 x 576) display’s line structure can
potentially be observed and the resolving power of
the eye is not reached with the displayed horizontal
resolution. ( possibly half the eye’s potential)
– A HDTV (1920 x 1080) display’s line structure is
probably not observable and the resolving power of
the eye is probably matched with the displayed
horizontal resolution.

More Related Content

Similar to The EYE and the Television Display Slide

Dimenco_Brochure
Dimenco_BrochureDimenco_Brochure
Dimenco_Brochure
Kai Liang
 
Chapter 10: Display Systems
Chapter 10: Display SystemsChapter 10: Display Systems
Chapter 10: Display Systems
askme
 

Similar to The EYE and the Television Display Slide (20)

Pixel Perfect
Pixel PerfectPixel Perfect
Pixel Perfect
 
Size Matters
Size MattersSize Matters
Size Matters
 
Khaled Sarayeddine (Optinvent): Optical Technologies & Challenges for Next Ge...
Khaled Sarayeddine (Optinvent): Optical Technologies & Challenges for Next Ge...Khaled Sarayeddine (Optinvent): Optical Technologies & Challenges for Next Ge...
Khaled Sarayeddine (Optinvent): Optical Technologies & Challenges for Next Ge...
 
111 03 hardware 2 output
111 03 hardware 2 output111 03 hardware 2 output
111 03 hardware 2 output
 
Calculation of EVD and EVP
Calculation of EVD and EVPCalculation of EVD and EVP
Calculation of EVD and EVP
 
Depth Of Field
Depth Of FieldDepth Of Field
Depth Of Field
 
Cggggg
CgggggCggggg
Cggggg
 
Seminar file(ferroelectric liquid crystal display)
Seminar file(ferroelectric liquid crystal display)Seminar file(ferroelectric liquid crystal display)
Seminar file(ferroelectric liquid crystal display)
 
Evolution of the senses
Evolution of the sensesEvolution of the senses
Evolution of the senses
 
Visual Acuity .pptx
Visual Acuity .pptxVisual Acuity .pptx
Visual Acuity .pptx
 
3d television
3d television3d television
3d television
 
Low vision aid
Low vision aidLow vision aid
Low vision aid
 
What is spatial Resolution
What is spatial ResolutionWhat is spatial Resolution
What is spatial Resolution
 
Dimenco_Brochure
Dimenco_BrochureDimenco_Brochure
Dimenco_Brochure
 
Antti Sunnari (Dispelix Ltd): Full-color, single-waveguide near-eye displays ...
Antti Sunnari (Dispelix Ltd): Full-color, single-waveguide near-eye displays ...Antti Sunnari (Dispelix Ltd): Full-color, single-waveguide near-eye displays ...
Antti Sunnari (Dispelix Ltd): Full-color, single-waveguide near-eye displays ...
 
Khaled Sarayeddine (Optinvent): Optical Technologies for AR Smart Glasses
Khaled Sarayeddine (Optinvent): Optical Technologies for AR Smart GlassesKhaled Sarayeddine (Optinvent): Optical Technologies for AR Smart Glasses
Khaled Sarayeddine (Optinvent): Optical Technologies for AR Smart Glasses
 
Chapter 10: Display Systems
Chapter 10: Display SystemsChapter 10: Display Systems
Chapter 10: Display Systems
 
An Introduction to HDTV Principles-Part 1
An Introduction to HDTV Principles-Part 1    An Introduction to HDTV Principles-Part 1
An Introduction to HDTV Principles-Part 1
 
SID 2013
SID 2013SID 2013
SID 2013
 
Visual function in LV patients.pptx
Visual function in LV patients.pptxVisual function in LV patients.pptx
Visual function in LV patients.pptx
 

Recently uploaded

Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Victor Rentea
 
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
WSO2
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Safe Software
 
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Victor Rentea
 
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire businessWhy Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
panagenda
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
 
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
 
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
 
Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​
Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​
Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​
 
Stronger Together: Developing an Organizational Strategy for Accessible Desig...
Stronger Together: Developing an Organizational Strategy for Accessible Desig...Stronger Together: Developing an Organizational Strategy for Accessible Desig...
Stronger Together: Developing an Organizational Strategy for Accessible Desig...
 
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
 
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with MilvusExploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
 
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
 
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptxCorporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
 
API Governance and Monetization - The evolution of API governance
API Governance and Monetization -  The evolution of API governanceAPI Governance and Monetization -  The evolution of API governance
API Governance and Monetization - The evolution of API governance
 
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In PakistanCNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
 
How to Check CNIC Information Online with Pakdata cf
How to Check CNIC Information Online with Pakdata cfHow to Check CNIC Information Online with Pakdata cf
How to Check CNIC Information Online with Pakdata cf
 
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire businessWhy Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
 
The Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and Insight
The Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and InsightThe Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and Insight
The Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and Insight
 
WSO2's API Vision: Unifying Control, Empowering Developers
WSO2's API Vision: Unifying Control, Empowering DevelopersWSO2's API Vision: Unifying Control, Empowering Developers
WSO2's API Vision: Unifying Control, Empowering Developers
 
ChatGPT and Beyond - Elevating DevOps Productivity
ChatGPT and Beyond - Elevating DevOps ProductivityChatGPT and Beyond - Elevating DevOps Productivity
ChatGPT and Beyond - Elevating DevOps Productivity
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
 

The EYE and the Television Display Slide

  • 1. 14-Mar-24 WTD 1 The EYE and the Television Display Compiled by Wayne Dickson SMIREE MIEAust. CPEng. Member SMPTE in consultation with Bryan Powell of the ABC A brief consideration of the eye’s viewing potential and the relationship to a Television display is given. Discussion is encouraged on this complex subject which can only have a subjectively based conclusion. 13 October 98
  • 2. 14-Mar-24 WTD 2 The Normal EYE • What is “20/20 Vision” ? – Being able to, at a distance of 20 feet, read a character, eg the letter E, which is meant to be read at a distance of 20 feet. – The size of the letter E for example which can be read by the eye with 20/20 vision is : • 20/15 vision is better than 20/30 vision. 5 minutes of arc 5 1 1 1 1 1 1
  • 3. 14-Mar-24 WTD 3 The size of the characters to test 20/20 vision ? • 1 minute equals 1/60 of a degree • This is the “normal” minimum discernible resolution for a human eye when tested for character recognition. 20 feet O D O = 1 minute D = 2 x 20 feet x Tan (O/2) = 0.07 inches ( 1.8mm) Hence the letter E will be 9 mm x 9 mm if intended to be read by a person with 20/20 vision at a distance of 20 feet or 6 metres.
  • 4. 14-Mar-24 WTD 4 • The eye under some conditions may provide : – “Vernier Acuity” of 8 seconds of arc. Eg. Offset of two lines placed end to end. – “Detection” can go down to 1 second, maybe 0.5 second Eg. single power lines in the sky. • With more complex patterns like a matrix of pixels in a colour television display, a probable best resolving power of around 30 seconds is thought to be typical. – Note that the eye can discriminate down to 1 % in intensity between overlapping light sources. – The eye has a greater resolution for vertical separated lines compared to horizontal separated lines. Maximum resolving power Hence approx. 1mm differences between “objects” maybe detectable, at a viewing distance 6 metres from a display, by a typical eye. 8 sec.
  • 5. 14-Mar-24 WTD 5 Maximum resolving power related to a Display size • With a viewing distance of 6 H (6 x height of picture) for SDTV and 4H for HDTV, and a typical best resolving power of the eye for a complex pattern of pixels of 30 sec. of arc, the minimum discernible object separation is : Display diagonal dim. Display height Minimum discernible object separation 5” 12” 18” 22” 27” 32” 42” (16:9) 10ft (16:9) 20ft (16:9) 76 mm 183 mm 274 mm 335 mm 412 mm 488 mm 640 mm 1830 mm 3658 mm 0.07 mm 0.16 mm 0.24 mm 0.29 mm 0.36 mm 0.43 mm 0.38 mm 1.1 mm 2.1 mm Viewing Distance 0.5 m 1.1 m 1.6 m 2 m 2.5 m 2.9 m 2.6 m 7.3 m 14.6 m The minimum pixel separation on a television display is currently 0.21 mm for a “Professional” Monitor to 0.35 mm for a “consumer” display. @ 6H @ 4H
  • 6. 14-Mar-24 WTD 6 “Pixel” separation in a display 4 (P) 3 (L) D Horizontal pixel separation = 4*D/(P*(4^2 +3^2)^0.5) = 4*D/(P*5) Vertical line separation = 3*D/(L*5) 16 (P) 9 (L) D Horizontal pixel separation = 16*D/(P*(16^2 +9^2)^0.5) =16*D/(P*(337)^0.5) Vertical line separation =9*D/(L*(337)^0.5) Where P = horizontal Pixels & L = vertical Lines
  • 7. 14-Mar-24 WTD 7 4:3 Display “pixel” size 4 (720) 3 (576) 18” Horizontal pixel separation = 0.51 mm Vertical line separation = 0.48 mm 4 (720) 3 (576) 27” Horizontal pixel separation = 0.76 mm Vertical line separation = 0.71 mm The “eye” discernability is possibly 0.36 mm @ 6H The “eye” discernability is possibly 0.24 mm @ 6H
  • 8. 14-Mar-24 WTD 8 16:9 Display “pixel” size 16 (1920) 9 (1080) 42” Horizontal pixel separation = 0 .48 mm Vertical line separation = 0.48 mm 16 (720) 9 (576) 42” Horizontal pixel separation = 1.2 mm Vertical line separation = 1.1 mm The “eye” discernability for a 42” display is possibly 0.4 mm @ 4H For robustness, variable pitch is sometimes used.
  • 9. 14-Mar-24 WTD 9 Large 16:9 Display “pixel” size 16 (1920) 9 (1080) 10 foot Horizontal pixel separation Vertical line separation = 1.4 mm = 1.4 mm The “eye”discernability for a 10ft display is possibly 1 mm @ 4H Note pixel count is : 2,073.600 pixels and “dot” count is : 6,220,800 dots.
  • 10. 14-Mar-24 WTD 10 Pixel separation versus Picture resolution R G B R G B R G B Pixel B Pixel A Pixel C Pixel B Pixel A Pixel C Pixel separation Pixel separation R G G B R R B B G or Pitch of the “Resolution” lines That is 1920 pixels horizontally gives 960 lines resolution and 720 pixels horizontally gives 360 lines resolution R G B R G B R G B Pixel B Pixel A Pixel C Pixel separation R G B or “Dot” “Slot” “Trinitron” or Plasma Mask pattern Horizontal (some examples)
  • 11. 14-Mar-24 WTD 11 Pixel separation versus Picture resolution R G B R G B R G B Pixel B Pixel A Pixel C Line & Pixel separation Line & Pixel separation R G B R B G or Pitch of the “Resolution” lines That is 1080 pixels vertically gives 540 lines resolution and 576 pixels vertically gives 288 lines resolution R G B Pixel B Pixel A Pixel C off off on on on on Note stripes are continuous for a Trinitron Vertical (some examples)
  • 12. 14-Mar-24 WTD 12 Other Considerations • The other dominant factors which may influence whether the line structures or the increased resolutions can actually be seen are : – “Kel factor” associated with interlace scans. (works to decrease the observed resolution both vertically and horizontally by 0.7 to 0.8) – Interlace artefacts such as “pairing” in displays (H to V xtalk) – Room lighting conditions. – Programme material type. – Programme production and coding artefacts – Display structures - dot, line, rectangular, black matrix, tube, plasma etc. – Display dynamics, persistence, dynamic focus, and shading correction. – Viewing distance - this analysis is based on 6H for SDTV and 4H for HDTV. – Variability of the human observer from the typical normal vision for a young observer.
  • 13. 14-Mar-24 WTD 13 Concluding analysis • By analysing the eye’s potential and the display’s “mechanics” to see if : – the number of vertical lines is too low and hence is observable – or the number of vertical lines is too high and is wasted – the displayed horizontal resolution can be seen – or the displayed horizontal resolution is below what could be resolved by the observer • Is the “eye” able to see the separation between the pixels or is the eye only able to detect the separation between alternate pixels, that is the resolution lines ? – I suspect the answer is dependent upon the “other considerations”, in particular the display structure and technology used. – If the perception of the eye is 30 sec. of arc and if the variation between adjacent pixels can be detected the followings conclusions are reached :
  • 14. 14-Mar-24 WTD 14 Conclusions • The following conclusions can generally be made at a viewing distance of 6H for SDTV and 4H for HDTV from the display: – A SDTV (720 x 576) display’s line structure can potentially be observed and the resolving power of the eye is not reached with the displayed horizontal resolution. ( possibly half the eye’s potential) – A HDTV (1920 x 1080) display’s line structure is probably not observable and the resolving power of the eye is probably matched with the displayed horizontal resolution.