Curriculum reform is a potential catalyst for institutional transformation in Higher Education, but curriculum design is often side-lined and seen as “marginal and subservient to the needs of strategic planning and quality assurance”. This paper explores the potential of the curriculum as the site of SoTL research drawing on insights from an action research project on a staff development activity in support of a curriculum change initiative at University College Cork. It considers the limitations of this research and the complexity of navigating the space between institutional frameworks, academic freedom, and individual practice.
3. INITIAL STEPS
Development
and pilot of
self-evaluation
framework and
mapping tool
Review of existing
programmes &
modules to
surface examples
Formation of
inter-disciplinary,
cross-functional
working group
Self-directed
online course on
‘The Connected
Curriculum and
You’
5. WHY THE CIVIC TURN IN HIGHER ED?
High impact educational practice
enhanced engagement, transversal skills, policy-theory-practice
Enhance citizenship
participatory, democratic approaches to knowledge production
Action-oriented responses
to sustainability challenges in partnership with communities
7. PREPARE
DESIGN
ALIGN
REFINE
Staff and
students
engage in
interactive
Learning
Design
workshop.
Staff and
students
consider key
questions
relating to the
module
pre-workshop.
Staff engage
in online
workshop on
either civic
engagement
or sustainability.
Staff engage
in 1:1
meetings
with
professional
development
mentors.
ONLINE
RESOURCES
LEARNING
CO-DESIGN
PEER
EXCHANGE
ONE:ONE
MENTORING
CONNECTED CURRICULUM DESIGN SPRINT
8. SELF-EVALUATION TOOL: CIVIC ENGAGEMENT
Introductory
element
Structured
inclusion
Main focus of
learning activity
Main focus of
assessment
Element is a design
feature
& intersects with
research
based learning
Community
engagement is
promoted through the
use of relevant
societal issues to
support connectivity
with local to global
communities.
Curriculum actively
connects
learners with an
issue identified by
a community
partner.
Structured experiential
learning across
Community-Based
Research (CBR),
Community Based
Learning (CBL),
Volunteering, Placement
or another recognised
high impact community
engagement method.
Students, community
partner and lecturers
as co-inquirers and
producers of a
curriculum
underpinned by a
participatory
pedagogy that
promotes relational,
critical and reflexive
practices.
Curriculum has an explicit
focus on citizenship, civic
values and democratic
skill-building. It
addresses structural
issues and seeks to
impact the quality of life
and learning with and for
the community.
9. SELF-EVALUATION TOOL: SUSTAINABILITY
Introductory
element
Structured inclusion Main focus of
learning activity
Main focus of
assessment
Element is a design
feature
& intersects with
research
based learning
Includes
sustainability
related topics in
the curriculum.
Provides insight on
sustainability from
the perspective of
the discipline.
Interdisciplinary
approaches used to
address at least one
SDG target.
Institutionalised
learning outcomes
used (e.g. critical and
systemic thinking,
collaborative decision-
making) to cultivate
global citizenship.
Uses community
outreach and/ or
action-oriented
pedagogies for
transformative
learning.
10.
11. RESEARCH DESIGN - KIRKPATRICK MODEL
Analysis of submissions to Canvas Course
Notes from Learning Design workshop
Staff and student survey
Staff and student survey
Interviews with staff participants on Design sprint
Notes from Design Sprint facilitators
Case studies showing how to integrate CC element
Case study of Design Sprint process
Behaviour Overview of staff proposed curricular changes
12. ONLINE COURSE AND SELF EVALUATION TOOL
“… the boxes should be revised to allow for more spaces to
include information”.
“It is up to yourself where to put the points and you would
need to understand what each term meant. Perhaps criteria /
subheadings and examples would help some reflect in a
meaningful way to complete it”.
“I find these kinds of Tools very unconducive to reflection... …I
was happier and better able to express my thinking on the
relevant issues by simply typing in text”.
13. “I had no idea what to expect prior to the workshop so could
have been better prepared if I had known what I was supposed
to do in terms of participation/facilitation and given an outline
of how the workshop would run in advance”.
LEARNING DESIGN WORKSHOP
14. “I didn’t have a realistic vision of what was what and how it could be
realised. I had no sense as to how do I operationalise this on a
modular level… … it’s much, much clearer in terms of the vision of
what I think I want for this module”.
“it actually prepared me for my own curriculum review because I had
a better see of deconstructing a little bit of what I did”
“I got some really both insightful and revealing feedback from them,
which I’m going to bring forward”
“I actually have changed the syllabus following those discussions”
DESIGN SPRINT FEEDBACK
15. 1: Update existing
modules
… ..
.. .. 2: Emergent process
for students as
partners in curriculum
design
3: Revised self-
evaluation tool
4: Case studies
reflecting ways
to integrate
Connected
Curriculum
OUTCOMES
16. Toolkits and
expertise
Additional resources
and expertise to
support staff
Early adopters and
champions
Programme review
Enhancing practice
Assessment redesign
Learning Design
approach
Students experts on
their experience as
learners
KEY REQUIREMENTS
17. SELF-EVALUATION TOOL: CIVIC ENGAGEMENT
Introductory
element
Structured
inclusion
Main focus of
learning activity
Main focus of
assessment
Element is a design
feature
& intersects with
research
based learning
Community
engagement is
promoted through the
use of relevant
societal issues to
support connectivity
with local to global
communities.
Curriculum actively
connects
learners with an
issue identified by
a community
partner.
Structured experiential
learning across
Community-Based
Research (CBR),
Community Based
Learning (CBL),
Volunteering, Placement
or another recognised
high impact community
engagement method.
Students, community
partner and lecturers
as co-inquirers and
producers of a
curriculum
underpinned by a
participatory
pedagogy that
promotes relational,
critical and reflexive
practices.
Curriculum has an explicit
focus on citizenship, civic
values and democratic
skill-building. It
addresses structural
issues and seeks to
impact the quality of life
and learning with and for
the community.
Social work Plant Science Law Occupational
Therapy
Planning
& Sus. Dev.
Engaged
Research
18. SELF-EVALUATION TOOL: SUSTAINABILITY
Introductory
element
Structured inclusion Main focus of
learning activity
Main focus of
assessment
Element is a design
feature
& intersects with
research
based learning
Includes
sustainability
related topics in
the curriculum.
Provides insight on
sustainability from
the perspective of
the discipline.
Interdisciplinary
approaches used to
address at least one
SDG target.
Institutionalised
learning outcomes
used (e.g. critical and
systemic thinking,
collaborative decision-
making) to cultivate
global citizenship.
Uses community
outreach and/ or
action-oriented
pedagogies for
transformative
learning.
All STEM
programmes
German
Literature
Civil
Engineering
Sustainability in
Enterprise
20. EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Equipping learners with the relevant
knowledge (the what), the key dispositions
and skills (the how) and the values (the
why) that will motivate and empower them
Curriculum
Practice
Policies
Estates
Research
Student Life