The answers you get depend on the questions you ask.
—Thomas Kuhn
Learning Objectives
After reading this chapter, you
should be able to:
1. Distinguish between scholarly and
popular sources and decide when and
how to use each type.
2. Analyze your research needs using a
simple mnemonic: BEAM.
3. Write and analyze a research question
that will make it much easier for you
to formulate search terms and find
the best sources for your project.
4. Find, locate, and choose the right
research databases to help you
answer your research questions.
5. Search databases efficiently to pro-
duce useful results.
3Finding Good Sources
Jupiterimages/BananaStock/Thinkstock
dro85866_03_c03.indd 35 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Section 3.1 Distinguishing Between Scholarly, News, Trade, and Popular Sources
During the second phase of your research, you will locate researchers working on the
essential and supporting research questions you wrote in Phase I so that you can use their
findings and ideas as evidence in an argument, as well as contribute to the conversation
they are having.
If you have been working on Phase I, you already have some of the skills necessary to
locate research conversations using Google Scholar and its “Cited by” and “Related arti-
cles” links. In Phase II, you will continue working with Google Scholar and also with more
subject-specific databases available to you through your university or community library.
We will work on database selection, search strategies, and search results analysis early in
this chapter. Later in the chapter, we will discuss evaluating and working with the sources
you find.
With a well-designed research project in hand, it is time to get down to the nuts and bolts
of one of the most important elements of the research process: finding useful sources and
working to understand them—and what you can do with them—once you have them.
In this chapter, you will learn everything you need to know about library databases and
search construction in order to find, understand, analyze, and use a coherent set of cred-
ible, relevant, reliable sources with which to work.
3.1 Distinguishing Between Scholarly, News,
Trade, and Popular Sources
As you start the work of the second phase of your research, it is important to under-stand the difference between two major types of sources: scholarly sources and news, trade, and popular sources. While each kind of source can contain useful
information and interesting perspectives, they have different kinds of authority, which
determine how you can use them in academic research.
Scholarly Sources
Scholarly sources are produced by professional researchers seeking to advance or evalu-
ate knowledge, who submit their work for peer review. As you learned in Chapter 1, peer
review certifies the rigor of the research process and the reasonableness of the researcher’s
argument and interpretations. In order to be scholarly, both journal articles and ...
This document discusses information literacy and defines key concepts. It explains that information literacy allows students to effectively identify, access, evaluate, and use information to meet their needs. It outlines various types of information and provides tips for locating reliable sources. The document emphasizes the importance of evaluating information critically and using it responsibly and ethically.
Learn how to identify what to look for when selecting resources; judge if information will be relevant for your assignments and recognise if a source is credible.
Literature Review,Data Collection, Bibliography & CitationHaroon Rashid
This document discusses literature reviews, data collection, bibliographies, and citation styles. It provides information on how to conduct literature reviews and outlines their key components. It also discusses different methods of primary and secondary data collection. The document concludes by defining bibliographies and citations, listing examples of citations in MLA, APA, and Harvard styles, and distinguishing between bibliographies and citations.
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideaspart 1.pptxSherlyMaeNeri
This document provides guidance on evaluating the reliability and credibility of information sources. It discusses five key factors to consider: currency, accuracy, authority, relevance, and purpose. Currency refers to how up-to-date the information is. Accuracy means the information is supported by facts and evidence. Authority is the credentials and expertise of the author. Relevance is how closely the information relates to the topic. Purpose considers why the source was created and potential biases. Students are encouraged to think critically about sources by investigating these factors.
The document discusses evaluating sources for research. It describes primary sources as original materials like documents and accounts, and secondary sources as works that analyze and interpret primary sources, like scholarly articles. It notes that sources can be in print or online, with print sources often being more stable but many now digitized. It emphasizes considering a source's relevance, the author's credentials, potential biases, publisher/funder, date, and accessibility when evaluating if it suits your research needs. Field research methods like interviews and surveys are covered, with tips on writing questionnaires that clearly define goals and samples.
This document provides an overview of key concepts related to information literacy. It defines information and discusses its purpose and types. It distinguishes between factual and analytical information, subjective and objective information, current and historical information, and scholarly and popular information. It also defines primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. The document discusses information fluency, assessing information quality, organizing information, and the ethical use and handling of information.
A literature review analyzes and evaluates existing research on a topic. It should include journal articles, books, conference proceedings, government/corporate reports, and theses/dissertations. Journal articles are concise and up-to-date but may be refereed or non-refereed. Refereed materials are peer-reviewed to ensure reliability. Books provide background but are less current. The literature review critically examines prior work, shows relationships between studies, and relates the research to the author's project. It answers questions about current knowledge, theories, inconsistencies, needed evidence, and the importance of further study.
This document discusses information literacy and defines key concepts. It explains that information literacy allows students to effectively identify, access, evaluate, and use information to meet their needs. It outlines various types of information and provides tips for locating reliable sources. The document emphasizes the importance of evaluating information critically and using it responsibly and ethically.
Learn how to identify what to look for when selecting resources; judge if information will be relevant for your assignments and recognise if a source is credible.
Literature Review,Data Collection, Bibliography & CitationHaroon Rashid
This document discusses literature reviews, data collection, bibliographies, and citation styles. It provides information on how to conduct literature reviews and outlines their key components. It also discusses different methods of primary and secondary data collection. The document concludes by defining bibliographies and citations, listing examples of citations in MLA, APA, and Harvard styles, and distinguishing between bibliographies and citations.
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideaspart 1.pptxSherlyMaeNeri
This document provides guidance on evaluating the reliability and credibility of information sources. It discusses five key factors to consider: currency, accuracy, authority, relevance, and purpose. Currency refers to how up-to-date the information is. Accuracy means the information is supported by facts and evidence. Authority is the credentials and expertise of the author. Relevance is how closely the information relates to the topic. Purpose considers why the source was created and potential biases. Students are encouraged to think critically about sources by investigating these factors.
The document discusses evaluating sources for research. It describes primary sources as original materials like documents and accounts, and secondary sources as works that analyze and interpret primary sources, like scholarly articles. It notes that sources can be in print or online, with print sources often being more stable but many now digitized. It emphasizes considering a source's relevance, the author's credentials, potential biases, publisher/funder, date, and accessibility when evaluating if it suits your research needs. Field research methods like interviews and surveys are covered, with tips on writing questionnaires that clearly define goals and samples.
This document provides an overview of key concepts related to information literacy. It defines information and discusses its purpose and types. It distinguishes between factual and analytical information, subjective and objective information, current and historical information, and scholarly and popular information. It also defines primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. The document discusses information fluency, assessing information quality, organizing information, and the ethical use and handling of information.
A literature review analyzes and evaluates existing research on a topic. It should include journal articles, books, conference proceedings, government/corporate reports, and theses/dissertations. Journal articles are concise and up-to-date but may be refereed or non-refereed. Refereed materials are peer-reviewed to ensure reliability. Books provide background but are less current. The literature review critically examines prior work, shows relationships between studies, and relates the research to the author's project. It answers questions about current knowledge, theories, inconsistencies, needed evidence, and the importance of further study.
A literature review surveys academic publications relevant to a particular area of research. Key sources include journal articles, books, conference proceedings, government/corporate reports, theses/dissertations, and some internet sources. Journal articles are useful as they provide up-to-date information, often in a concise format. Refereed/peer-reviewed journals assure readers that the information has been verified by experts. Books offer a starting point but may be less current. The literature review evaluates what is already known in the area, shows relationships between different works, and relates them to the author's own research project, rather than just summarizing others' work. It should answer questions about existing theories, inconsistencies, evidence gaps, and
(A Simplification of the) Framework for information literacyDana Longley
The Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education outlines six frames for teaching information literacy: 1) Research as Inquiry, 2) Searching as Strategic Exploration, 3) Scholarship as Conversation, 4) Information Creation as a Process, 5) Authority is Constructed and Contextual, and 6) Information Has Value. The frames were developed as an alternative to standards and emphasize core concepts of information literacy rather than specific learning outcomes or objectives.
Evaluating Credible and Scholarly Scientific SourcesWeek T.docxAlleneMcclendon878
Evaluating Credible and Scholarly Scientific Sources
Week Two Assignment
In this assignment, you will examine three different sources - one source that would be considered scholarly, one source that is credible but not scholarly, and one source that would not be considered credible for use in an academic paper. After completing a worksheet on each source, can you identify which is which?
Instructions
When looking up various scientific topics, including the example topic this week on technology and food production in the U.S., you will find all kinds of information out there. Not all of it is reliable. In order to determine if a source provides credible information, you will need to take the time to evaluate that source first before you can trust its content. Who is the intended audience of the source? Who is the author or publisher and what is their purpose for publishing the resource? These are examples of the questions you will want to ask yourself when evaluating a source.
Examine these three sources and fill out the following worksheet for each one. You will be determining what type of source it is (scholarly, credible non-scholarly, and non-credible), its level of credibility, and its possible value or use within the scientific conversation about technology and agriculture in the U.S.
To help you determine the credibility of a source, refer this quick video tutorial on
Evaluating Sources for Credibility.
Additionally, consult the strategies outlined in the
CRAAP TEST
.
Keep in mind that you are evaluating the sources themselves and not the content within the source, or whether you agree with the positions or statements that are expressed within the source.
Please write your answers in complete sentences.
Source Links
Source #1:
http://www.saynotogmos.org/
Source #2:
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0064879
Source #3:
https://www.loc.gov/law/help/restrictions-on-gmos/usa.php
Source #1
1.
What best describes the information within this source (choose all that apply):
Formal report of a study or academic analysis of an issue
Fact sheet / data / statistics
News
Government or organizational website
Opinion piece: expert? Journalist? amateur?
Anecdote / personal experience
Propaganda
What led you to choose this answer? Provide evidence or examples from the text.
2.
Currency: For this topic, is the information…
Up to date
Outdated
Not sure (explain):
3.
The purpose of the information is to:
Inform
Persuade
Entertain
Sell
Other:
What led you to choose this answer? Provide evidence or examples from the text.
4.
Does the author provide reliable evidence to back up his or her assertions? How do you know?
(Tip: Look for references within the text or presented as a list. Ask yourself if the references are formally formatted and if they add weight and credibility to the discussion.)
.
11/3/21, 2:11 PM Print
https://content.uagc.edu/print/Winckelman.6528.21.1?sections=ch04sec4.3,ch04sec4.4&content=all&clientToken=8318aacc-4937-6150-1ad7-aa5ac606aea7&np=ch… 1/11
4.3 How Do I Evaluate a Source’s Relevance?
Your Road Map to Success: Section 4.3
Learning Outcome 4.3: Identify the criteria used to evaluate the relevance of information.
Why is this important?
You might assume that when it comes to sources for your research paper, the more you have,
the better your paper will be. But quality is more important than quantity. Being able to
evaluate the relevance of information will help you stay focused on your goals by eliminating
unnecessary information.
How does this relate to your success in this course?
Mastering this learning outcome will help you identify and avoid tangential or nonessential
information that could distract you from the central focus on your research.
When evaluating sources, including sources found on the Internet, in the library, or in print, be sure to consider
whether the content meets your needs. This is called determining an information source’s relevance. This goes
beyond simply asking if the source relates to your topic. Rather, how well does it help answer your question or
enhance your understanding? Keep in mind that a resource may not be an exact match or completely answer your
question, but it could describe a certain angle of your topic that you may want to explore further. Therefore, it
could still have value for you. Deciding whether something is relevant to your research is a bit of a judgment
call, but the following strategies can help.
Revisit the Scope of Research
As you consider sources, it’s important to keep the scope of your research in mind. As we explored in Chapter 1,
your research question should be narrowed according to the purpose of the research as well as the audience. A
brief PowerPoint presentation intended to introduce a topic to your classmates, for instance, will require
definitions and other fundamental types of information, whereas a 20-page research essay for your instructor will
require deeper evidence and analyses. Notice how the intended audience dictates the focus and depth of the
information. Content is generally created for different groups, such as practitioners, researchers, the general
11/3/21, 2:11 PM Print
https://content.uagc.edu/print/Winckelman.6528.21.1?sections=ch04sec4.3,ch04sec4.4&content=all&clientToken=8318aacc-4937-6150-1ad7-aa5ac606aea7&np=ch… 2/11
public, or maybe special-interest groups within the general public, such as those who belong to certain political
parties, religions, lifestyles, and so on.
In thinking about relevance, Irwin reconsiders the scope of his research once more. He has chosen to focus on
how social networks have impacted business, and marketing in particular. His digital literacy teacher and
potentially his classmates are his audience, so he needs information that is professional but not overly technical.
One w ...
The document discusses evaluating the relevance and authority of information sources. It provides tips for determining if a source is relevant, such as considering the intended audience and scope of research. Authority is described as the level of education and experience that qualifies someone to publish information on a topic. Authority is also contextual and constructed depending on the situation. When evaluating authority, the document recommends identifying the publisher and examining an author's credentials to determine if they are an expert on the topic.
A conflict of interest arises whenever there is any potential bias that could affect a researcher’s work. Avoid post-publication headaches by disclosing all conflicts of interest upfront.
CHAPTER6RESEARCHLEARNING OBJECTIVES• Describe the importan.docxtiffanyd4
CHAPTER
6
RESEARCH
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
• Describe the importance of responsible research choices
• Outline an effective, efficient research strategy
• Create search terms for focused online searches
• Gather relevant research materials
• Discover the note-taking approach that works best for you
• Evaluate the credibility and usefulness of different sources
• Effectively organize research materials and choose the most useful ones
• Correctly cite your sourcesCHAPTER OUTLINE
• Introduction: Becoming an Expert
• Researching Responsibly
• The Research Process
• How to Conduct an Online Search
• Gathering Your Materials
• Reading Your Materials and Taking Notes
• Evaluating Sources
• Revising Your Claims
• Organizing Your Research Information
• Choosing the Sources for Your Speech
• Citing Your Sources and Avoiding Plagiarism
• Getting Help from a Research Expert
Robert and Dixie have been assigned to speak on either side of an issue, a kind of “pros and cons” format. They chose home schooling as their issue. each has a general position on it (Dixie is in favor, and Robert against) but they admit they just don't know that much about it. So what now? How do they become well enough informed to give a speech on the topic? Where should they even start? How can you keep track of your research? Do you have cite it?Overview
Research is necessary for an effective public speech. This chapter will help you make responsible, well-crafted, and carefully executed research choices. First, we will help you figure out what you already know and translate that knowledge into a research strategy. Next, we will provide some concrete tips on where to go for research (including other people as well as the Internet and the library), how to design a good search query for search engines and databases, and how to narrow your search. After that, we will address what you need to do once you have collected your research material, including how to read through it, take notes, and evaluate which sources are worthwhile. Finally, we will deal with how to use your research process to refine your arguments, choose and organize your quotations, and give proper credit for the sources you use in your speech.
MindTap®
Start with a warm-up activity about Stephanie's speech, and review the chapter's Learning Objectives.INTRODUCTION: BECOMING AN EXPERT
Researching, composing, and delivering an effective public speech requires you to acquire some expertise on your topic. You don't have to be the kind of expert who can produce original facts, figures, and data and publish groundbreaking work regarding your topic. But you do need to become enough of an expert on your topic to translate the research that you have done to an audience that may not have the same background or comfort with concepts and terminology that you have developed in your research. On your topic, you are the expert for your audience's purposes. You should cultivate enough expertise on your topic to bring new insights to .
The document discusses techniques for developing critical reading skills. It defines critical reading as evaluating claims, seeking definitions, making judgments after careful consideration. Key techniques include keeping a reading journal, annotating texts by underlining or noting questions, outlining texts to understand structure and ideas, summarizing main points and details, and questioning points of skepticism. The document also discusses identifying explicit vs implicit information, determining the writer's central claim or thesis by their intended point or position, and different types of claims including facts, values, and policies.
Documenting Research discusses the importance of properly citing sources to avoid plagiarism. It notes that plagiarism can involve directly copying or paraphrasing without attribution. It provides guidance on taking notes, using quotation marks, and citing sources in papers. The document explains the need to cite sources using a standard format like APA or MLA style and provides examples of citations in APA format. It stresses evaluating sources and incorporating them properly into papers with citations.
Unit 4 LectureDeveloping a ProposalUnit 4 focuses on developi.docxmarilucorr
Unit 4: Lecture
Developing a Proposal
Unit 4 focuses on developing your topic for your final report and conducting some preliminary research for your final project. Your reading for this unit (Chs. 15, 17 and Appendix C ) cover how to research and write proposals, as well as how to cite your work in a business report. Make sure to review these chapters carefully as you prepare your discussion and assignment for this unit.
What are Proposals?
A proposal is a persuasive genre in which a writer convinces an audience to accept or approve some course of action. As your book says, “proposals argue for work that needs to be done” (552).
In business contexts, a proposal might outline a new policy and request implementation or request money to fund a special project. For our purposes, your proposal will focus on seeking approval for your topic for your final business report.
According to Ch. 17, good business proposals answer the following questions:
· What problem are you going to solve or what opportunity do you hope to fill?
· Why does the problem need to be solved now or the opportunity explored immediately?
· How are you going to solve it?
· Can you do the work?
· Why should you be the one to do it?
· When will you complete the work?
· How much will you charge?
· What exactly will you provide for us?
For our purpose in this class, we are not going to worry about the questions about timelines, qualifications, or fees, as our timeline is already set, everyone has to do the report, and you will be writing your report for experience and learning, rather than money. However, be mindful that in a real world situation, all of these questions may be important to address.
Defining a Problem to Explore in your Proposal and Report:
According to Ch. 15, a good problem to explore for a business report should use the following guidelines:
· The problem is real, significant enough to be worth solving, and narrow but challenging
· The audience is also real and has the power to make decisions based on your report
· The evidence (e.g. data, facts, sources) is sufficient to show the importance of the problem and to prove that your recommendations will solve the problem.
When writing your proposal, use the advice in Chapter 15 about writing a purpose statement and review the example on pg. 492.
How to Conduct Research:
There is a wide range of research available to you that could be used to develop your report.
For example, you may find any or all of these types useful in a business report:
· Newspaper articles (For example, The Washington Post)
· Articles in popular magazines or non-fiction books (for example, Newsweek)
· Articles in industry-specific publications (for example, HR Magazine)
· Websites and publications of professional organizations (for example, The National Association of Business Management Professionals)
· Journal articles and books written by academics (for example, Business Communication Quarterly)
· Surveys or interviews you have cond ...
The document discusses publication ethics, including defining authorship, avoiding plagiarism and fabrication, managing conflicts of interest, and addressing misconduct. It introduces guidelines from organizations like COPE and WAME that provide best practices for publication ethics. Adhering to ethical standards is important to ensure high-quality scientific research and public trust in findings. Journals have processes to identify and handle cases of unethical behavior.
This document summarizes key chapters from the 6th edition of the APA Manual. It discusses several types of research articles, including empirical studies, literature reviews, theoretical articles, methodological articles, and case studies. It also outlines important ethical standards for publishing, such as ensuring accurate reporting of results, protecting research participants, avoiding plagiarism and duplicate publication, and disclosing conflicts of interest. The document emphasizes the importance of ethical research practices and compliance with standards for maintaining integrity in scientific publishing.
One of the main ideas of research is to study what others have published and form your own opinions. When you quote people -- or even when you summarize or paraphrase information found in books, articles, or Web pages -- you must acknowledge the original author.
Mr. Beridon received your requests for information and returned .docxroushhsiu
- Jeemp Farms grows sod and trees, selling mainly to home builders for landscaping new subdivisions. They provide both sod and trees in a "package deal".
- Their production processes differ, with sod requiring planting, irrigation, cutting, and rolling, while trees require planting, grafting, watering to maturity, and digging up.
- The company has delayed purchasing new machinery that would increase tree planting efficiency due to high upfront costs and uncertain profits. Historically they have always sold all that they produce.
This document outlines the key aspects of conducting mass media research. It discusses what research is, the importance of research, and the different types of research including qualitative and quantitative approaches. It also covers important research concepts like variables, specifically independent and dependent variables. The document then discusses different types of media research and looks at why research is important in the media industry. Finally, it outlines the basic five step research process of defining needs, developing a strategy, conducting research, evaluating resources, and incorporating resources into a final research project or report.
1
Unit II
Lesson 2: Finding Reliable Sources
Introduction
When gathering research for your paper, you want to be sure that you are collecting only the most academically valid and most relevant research about your topic. Sometimes, what is acceptable in a public sphere is not acceptable in an academic sphere, so you want to be certain that when you put your time and energy into reading, annotating, and using a source, it is the best choice for the type of genre that you are writing in—the academic argumentative research paper.
In EH 1010 and in previous lessons, we have discussed the ways in which different spheres of knowledge have different expectations about what makes for a reliable source. However, now that we are firmly rooted in the academic sphere, we need to think about audience and have audience awareness as a result.
Choosing Argument Over Opinion
Sources that you collect should make arguments based upon supporting evidence. Opinions have their place, but not in argumentative writing, such as the kind you will do in academic writing situations.
Opinion: An opinion is a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty. People can have opinions about situations—social, political, economic, etc.—without having all the facts or without weighing all the facts because an opinion can be based upon someone’s personal view, attitude, or appraisal.
EXAMPLE 1:Peanut butter is the best food.
Obviously, in this example, we can see that there are faults in the statement. After all, food preferences are highly subjective. Even if you were able to find a food expert who was willing to state that peanut butter is the best food, it would still not be sufficient evidence upon which to base an argument.
EXAMPLE 2: NASA’s Space Shuttle program was a waste of taxpayer dollars.
In this second example, you can see that there is potential for an argument here. It is not always clear what is an opinion and what is an argument. The main thing to remember is that an opinion does not have backing, but an argument does. So if we were to take the statement above and add support to it, then it could become an argument because it would then have a correlation between the evidence being presented and the statement itself.
EXAMPLE 3 (revision):NASA’s Space Shuttle program was an unreasonable use of taxpayer dollars, with the final 22 flights averaging a cost of around $1.0 billion each (Pinchefsky, 2012).
As you can see here, the above example is an argument because it supplies evidence to support its claims.
Argument: An argument can be a statement, reason, or fact for or against a point. Typically, an argument is intended to convince or persuade an audience to adopt the writer’s argument.
In both of the examples below, the writer makes an assumption about what the evidence means and asserts a claim as a result.
EXAMPLE 1:Peanut butter is an excellent source of protein, with eight grams per two tablespoons. ...
EAPP Q2-English for Acad..............pptxdarrenmuralla2
This document discusses a lesson plan for an English for Academic and Professional Purposes course. The lesson focuses on gathering manifestos and analyzing the arguments used by writers.
The objectives are to identify the concept of argumentative writing, gather manifestos and analyze the arguments used, and create arguments with supporting evidence. Various activities are outlined to analyze arguments and issues, complete statements about arguments and manifestos, and gather evidence from sources. The document provides guidance on forming arguments and considering an audience to develop logical, emotional, and ethical appeals.
The document discusses evaluating different types of information sources for college-level research. It covers periodical sources like scholarly journals, trade publications, popular magazines, and newspapers. It also discusses evaluating websites and detecting bias, confirmation bias, and fake news. The key aspects discussed are developing the skill to evaluate sources critically, using the CRAAP test to assess currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose of sources.
Accident Up Ahead!Listen to this text being read aloud by a hu.docxmehek4
Accident Up Ahead!
Listen to this text being read aloud by a human being by clicking on this link.
Answer questions #1 and #2 and then answer #3 or #4.
1. When an accident or disaster occurs, many people will panic or just stand there looking. Why do they react that way? (Answer using a short paragraph.)
2. What fears and doubts does Jody have to overcome as she works? What helps her to keep going? (Answer using two short paragraphs.)
3. Write a paragraph about an accident that you experienced as a victim, an observer, or the person who helped the victim.
or
4. As one of the Fortins or Jodouins, write a letter to Jody Stevens thanking her for what she did.
Accident Up Ahead!
JANICE TYRWHITT
THE NORTHBOUND BUS had scarcely left North Bay, Ontario, when-at 1:30 a.m. on Saturday, October 11, 1975-it came to an abrupt halt. Peering out the bus window at Highway 11, Jody Stevens saw a line of taillights stretching into the night. "There must be an accident up ahead," she said to her seatmate. "I had better get out and help." Jody, a young nurse from Toronto, was on her way home to spend Thanksgiving (and celebrate her twenty-fourth birthday) with her family in Timmins. An October drizzle soaked her shoulders as she trudged past a quarter mile of stopped traffic to an eerie scene. In the flickering light of Coleman lamps and road flares, she saw the two-lane highway spattered with blood. An old school bus converted into a camper lay on its side in the ditch. A hunter's pickup truck was stalled in the left lane, the bodies of two moose lolling grotesquely from the back. Off the right shoulder was a silver Mercedes-Benz with a smashed hood. In the lane between them a silent ring of people had gathered round a fourth vehicle-a blue 1973 Ford, a crumpled wreck, with four people in it.
"I think they're all dead," a burly man told Jody.
She caught her breath and thought, Well, Stevens, what do you do now? Jody had packed a lot of experience into the two years since her graduation as a registered nurse, most recently at the Toronto East General Hospital. She threw off her corduroy coat and crawled into the back seat of the crushed car.
While Jody was riding north, twenty-six-year-old Charles Jodouin, his wife Jeanne, and her parents Omer and Lucie Fortin, were driving south from Timmins to visit Jeanne's sister in Kingston. Despite the late hour, traffic in both directions was fairly heavy. They were less than three miles out of North Bay when, suddenly, the left rear wheel spun off an oncoming converted school bus: it flew straight into the grill of a pickup truck moving south just ahead of the Jodouins. Then, out of control, the camperbus skidded across the centre line and sideswiped the Jodouins' blue Ford. A split second later a brand-new Mercedes, travelling behind the camper, also slammed into the Jodouins.
Scrambling into the wrecked blue Ford, Jody found herself in a welter of blood and splintered glass. Trapped in the driver's se.
Access the annual report provided in Course Materials to complete .docxmehek4
Access
the annual report provided in Course Materials to complete the Financial Reporting Problem, Part 1 assignment due in Week Six.
Analyze
the information contained in the company’s balance sheet and income statement to answer the following questions:
·
Are the assets included under the company’s current assets listed in the proper order? Explain your answer.
·
How are the company’s assets classified?
·
What are cash equivalents?
·
What are the company’s total current liabilities at the end of its most recent annual reporting period?
·
What are the company’s total current liabilities at the end of the previous annual reporting period?
·
Considering all the information you have gathered, why might this information be important to potential creditors, investors, and employees?
Create a table to summarize any dollar value answers. Then Summarize
the analysis in a 700- to 1,050-word paper in a Microsoft
®
Word document.
Format
your paper and presentation consistent with APA guidelines.
.
More Related Content
Similar to The answers you get depend on the questions you ask.—Thoma.docx
A literature review surveys academic publications relevant to a particular area of research. Key sources include journal articles, books, conference proceedings, government/corporate reports, theses/dissertations, and some internet sources. Journal articles are useful as they provide up-to-date information, often in a concise format. Refereed/peer-reviewed journals assure readers that the information has been verified by experts. Books offer a starting point but may be less current. The literature review evaluates what is already known in the area, shows relationships between different works, and relates them to the author's own research project, rather than just summarizing others' work. It should answer questions about existing theories, inconsistencies, evidence gaps, and
(A Simplification of the) Framework for information literacyDana Longley
The Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education outlines six frames for teaching information literacy: 1) Research as Inquiry, 2) Searching as Strategic Exploration, 3) Scholarship as Conversation, 4) Information Creation as a Process, 5) Authority is Constructed and Contextual, and 6) Information Has Value. The frames were developed as an alternative to standards and emphasize core concepts of information literacy rather than specific learning outcomes or objectives.
Evaluating Credible and Scholarly Scientific SourcesWeek T.docxAlleneMcclendon878
Evaluating Credible and Scholarly Scientific Sources
Week Two Assignment
In this assignment, you will examine three different sources - one source that would be considered scholarly, one source that is credible but not scholarly, and one source that would not be considered credible for use in an academic paper. After completing a worksheet on each source, can you identify which is which?
Instructions
When looking up various scientific topics, including the example topic this week on technology and food production in the U.S., you will find all kinds of information out there. Not all of it is reliable. In order to determine if a source provides credible information, you will need to take the time to evaluate that source first before you can trust its content. Who is the intended audience of the source? Who is the author or publisher and what is their purpose for publishing the resource? These are examples of the questions you will want to ask yourself when evaluating a source.
Examine these three sources and fill out the following worksheet for each one. You will be determining what type of source it is (scholarly, credible non-scholarly, and non-credible), its level of credibility, and its possible value or use within the scientific conversation about technology and agriculture in the U.S.
To help you determine the credibility of a source, refer this quick video tutorial on
Evaluating Sources for Credibility.
Additionally, consult the strategies outlined in the
CRAAP TEST
.
Keep in mind that you are evaluating the sources themselves and not the content within the source, or whether you agree with the positions or statements that are expressed within the source.
Please write your answers in complete sentences.
Source Links
Source #1:
http://www.saynotogmos.org/
Source #2:
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0064879
Source #3:
https://www.loc.gov/law/help/restrictions-on-gmos/usa.php
Source #1
1.
What best describes the information within this source (choose all that apply):
Formal report of a study or academic analysis of an issue
Fact sheet / data / statistics
News
Government or organizational website
Opinion piece: expert? Journalist? amateur?
Anecdote / personal experience
Propaganda
What led you to choose this answer? Provide evidence or examples from the text.
2.
Currency: For this topic, is the information…
Up to date
Outdated
Not sure (explain):
3.
The purpose of the information is to:
Inform
Persuade
Entertain
Sell
Other:
What led you to choose this answer? Provide evidence or examples from the text.
4.
Does the author provide reliable evidence to back up his or her assertions? How do you know?
(Tip: Look for references within the text or presented as a list. Ask yourself if the references are formally formatted and if they add weight and credibility to the discussion.)
.
11/3/21, 2:11 PM Print
https://content.uagc.edu/print/Winckelman.6528.21.1?sections=ch04sec4.3,ch04sec4.4&content=all&clientToken=8318aacc-4937-6150-1ad7-aa5ac606aea7&np=ch… 1/11
4.3 How Do I Evaluate a Source’s Relevance?
Your Road Map to Success: Section 4.3
Learning Outcome 4.3: Identify the criteria used to evaluate the relevance of information.
Why is this important?
You might assume that when it comes to sources for your research paper, the more you have,
the better your paper will be. But quality is more important than quantity. Being able to
evaluate the relevance of information will help you stay focused on your goals by eliminating
unnecessary information.
How does this relate to your success in this course?
Mastering this learning outcome will help you identify and avoid tangential or nonessential
information that could distract you from the central focus on your research.
When evaluating sources, including sources found on the Internet, in the library, or in print, be sure to consider
whether the content meets your needs. This is called determining an information source’s relevance. This goes
beyond simply asking if the source relates to your topic. Rather, how well does it help answer your question or
enhance your understanding? Keep in mind that a resource may not be an exact match or completely answer your
question, but it could describe a certain angle of your topic that you may want to explore further. Therefore, it
could still have value for you. Deciding whether something is relevant to your research is a bit of a judgment
call, but the following strategies can help.
Revisit the Scope of Research
As you consider sources, it’s important to keep the scope of your research in mind. As we explored in Chapter 1,
your research question should be narrowed according to the purpose of the research as well as the audience. A
brief PowerPoint presentation intended to introduce a topic to your classmates, for instance, will require
definitions and other fundamental types of information, whereas a 20-page research essay for your instructor will
require deeper evidence and analyses. Notice how the intended audience dictates the focus and depth of the
information. Content is generally created for different groups, such as practitioners, researchers, the general
11/3/21, 2:11 PM Print
https://content.uagc.edu/print/Winckelman.6528.21.1?sections=ch04sec4.3,ch04sec4.4&content=all&clientToken=8318aacc-4937-6150-1ad7-aa5ac606aea7&np=ch… 2/11
public, or maybe special-interest groups within the general public, such as those who belong to certain political
parties, religions, lifestyles, and so on.
In thinking about relevance, Irwin reconsiders the scope of his research once more. He has chosen to focus on
how social networks have impacted business, and marketing in particular. His digital literacy teacher and
potentially his classmates are his audience, so he needs information that is professional but not overly technical.
One w ...
The document discusses evaluating the relevance and authority of information sources. It provides tips for determining if a source is relevant, such as considering the intended audience and scope of research. Authority is described as the level of education and experience that qualifies someone to publish information on a topic. Authority is also contextual and constructed depending on the situation. When evaluating authority, the document recommends identifying the publisher and examining an author's credentials to determine if they are an expert on the topic.
A conflict of interest arises whenever there is any potential bias that could affect a researcher’s work. Avoid post-publication headaches by disclosing all conflicts of interest upfront.
CHAPTER6RESEARCHLEARNING OBJECTIVES• Describe the importan.docxtiffanyd4
CHAPTER
6
RESEARCH
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
• Describe the importance of responsible research choices
• Outline an effective, efficient research strategy
• Create search terms for focused online searches
• Gather relevant research materials
• Discover the note-taking approach that works best for you
• Evaluate the credibility and usefulness of different sources
• Effectively organize research materials and choose the most useful ones
• Correctly cite your sourcesCHAPTER OUTLINE
• Introduction: Becoming an Expert
• Researching Responsibly
• The Research Process
• How to Conduct an Online Search
• Gathering Your Materials
• Reading Your Materials and Taking Notes
• Evaluating Sources
• Revising Your Claims
• Organizing Your Research Information
• Choosing the Sources for Your Speech
• Citing Your Sources and Avoiding Plagiarism
• Getting Help from a Research Expert
Robert and Dixie have been assigned to speak on either side of an issue, a kind of “pros and cons” format. They chose home schooling as their issue. each has a general position on it (Dixie is in favor, and Robert against) but they admit they just don't know that much about it. So what now? How do they become well enough informed to give a speech on the topic? Where should they even start? How can you keep track of your research? Do you have cite it?Overview
Research is necessary for an effective public speech. This chapter will help you make responsible, well-crafted, and carefully executed research choices. First, we will help you figure out what you already know and translate that knowledge into a research strategy. Next, we will provide some concrete tips on where to go for research (including other people as well as the Internet and the library), how to design a good search query for search engines and databases, and how to narrow your search. After that, we will address what you need to do once you have collected your research material, including how to read through it, take notes, and evaluate which sources are worthwhile. Finally, we will deal with how to use your research process to refine your arguments, choose and organize your quotations, and give proper credit for the sources you use in your speech.
MindTap®
Start with a warm-up activity about Stephanie's speech, and review the chapter's Learning Objectives.INTRODUCTION: BECOMING AN EXPERT
Researching, composing, and delivering an effective public speech requires you to acquire some expertise on your topic. You don't have to be the kind of expert who can produce original facts, figures, and data and publish groundbreaking work regarding your topic. But you do need to become enough of an expert on your topic to translate the research that you have done to an audience that may not have the same background or comfort with concepts and terminology that you have developed in your research. On your topic, you are the expert for your audience's purposes. You should cultivate enough expertise on your topic to bring new insights to .
The document discusses techniques for developing critical reading skills. It defines critical reading as evaluating claims, seeking definitions, making judgments after careful consideration. Key techniques include keeping a reading journal, annotating texts by underlining or noting questions, outlining texts to understand structure and ideas, summarizing main points and details, and questioning points of skepticism. The document also discusses identifying explicit vs implicit information, determining the writer's central claim or thesis by their intended point or position, and different types of claims including facts, values, and policies.
Documenting Research discusses the importance of properly citing sources to avoid plagiarism. It notes that plagiarism can involve directly copying or paraphrasing without attribution. It provides guidance on taking notes, using quotation marks, and citing sources in papers. The document explains the need to cite sources using a standard format like APA or MLA style and provides examples of citations in APA format. It stresses evaluating sources and incorporating them properly into papers with citations.
Unit 4 LectureDeveloping a ProposalUnit 4 focuses on developi.docxmarilucorr
Unit 4: Lecture
Developing a Proposal
Unit 4 focuses on developing your topic for your final report and conducting some preliminary research for your final project. Your reading for this unit (Chs. 15, 17 and Appendix C ) cover how to research and write proposals, as well as how to cite your work in a business report. Make sure to review these chapters carefully as you prepare your discussion and assignment for this unit.
What are Proposals?
A proposal is a persuasive genre in which a writer convinces an audience to accept or approve some course of action. As your book says, “proposals argue for work that needs to be done” (552).
In business contexts, a proposal might outline a new policy and request implementation or request money to fund a special project. For our purposes, your proposal will focus on seeking approval for your topic for your final business report.
According to Ch. 17, good business proposals answer the following questions:
· What problem are you going to solve or what opportunity do you hope to fill?
· Why does the problem need to be solved now or the opportunity explored immediately?
· How are you going to solve it?
· Can you do the work?
· Why should you be the one to do it?
· When will you complete the work?
· How much will you charge?
· What exactly will you provide for us?
For our purpose in this class, we are not going to worry about the questions about timelines, qualifications, or fees, as our timeline is already set, everyone has to do the report, and you will be writing your report for experience and learning, rather than money. However, be mindful that in a real world situation, all of these questions may be important to address.
Defining a Problem to Explore in your Proposal and Report:
According to Ch. 15, a good problem to explore for a business report should use the following guidelines:
· The problem is real, significant enough to be worth solving, and narrow but challenging
· The audience is also real and has the power to make decisions based on your report
· The evidence (e.g. data, facts, sources) is sufficient to show the importance of the problem and to prove that your recommendations will solve the problem.
When writing your proposal, use the advice in Chapter 15 about writing a purpose statement and review the example on pg. 492.
How to Conduct Research:
There is a wide range of research available to you that could be used to develop your report.
For example, you may find any or all of these types useful in a business report:
· Newspaper articles (For example, The Washington Post)
· Articles in popular magazines or non-fiction books (for example, Newsweek)
· Articles in industry-specific publications (for example, HR Magazine)
· Websites and publications of professional organizations (for example, The National Association of Business Management Professionals)
· Journal articles and books written by academics (for example, Business Communication Quarterly)
· Surveys or interviews you have cond ...
The document discusses publication ethics, including defining authorship, avoiding plagiarism and fabrication, managing conflicts of interest, and addressing misconduct. It introduces guidelines from organizations like COPE and WAME that provide best practices for publication ethics. Adhering to ethical standards is important to ensure high-quality scientific research and public trust in findings. Journals have processes to identify and handle cases of unethical behavior.
This document summarizes key chapters from the 6th edition of the APA Manual. It discusses several types of research articles, including empirical studies, literature reviews, theoretical articles, methodological articles, and case studies. It also outlines important ethical standards for publishing, such as ensuring accurate reporting of results, protecting research participants, avoiding plagiarism and duplicate publication, and disclosing conflicts of interest. The document emphasizes the importance of ethical research practices and compliance with standards for maintaining integrity in scientific publishing.
One of the main ideas of research is to study what others have published and form your own opinions. When you quote people -- or even when you summarize or paraphrase information found in books, articles, or Web pages -- you must acknowledge the original author.
Mr. Beridon received your requests for information and returned .docxroushhsiu
- Jeemp Farms grows sod and trees, selling mainly to home builders for landscaping new subdivisions. They provide both sod and trees in a "package deal".
- Their production processes differ, with sod requiring planting, irrigation, cutting, and rolling, while trees require planting, grafting, watering to maturity, and digging up.
- The company has delayed purchasing new machinery that would increase tree planting efficiency due to high upfront costs and uncertain profits. Historically they have always sold all that they produce.
This document outlines the key aspects of conducting mass media research. It discusses what research is, the importance of research, and the different types of research including qualitative and quantitative approaches. It also covers important research concepts like variables, specifically independent and dependent variables. The document then discusses different types of media research and looks at why research is important in the media industry. Finally, it outlines the basic five step research process of defining needs, developing a strategy, conducting research, evaluating resources, and incorporating resources into a final research project or report.
1
Unit II
Lesson 2: Finding Reliable Sources
Introduction
When gathering research for your paper, you want to be sure that you are collecting only the most academically valid and most relevant research about your topic. Sometimes, what is acceptable in a public sphere is not acceptable in an academic sphere, so you want to be certain that when you put your time and energy into reading, annotating, and using a source, it is the best choice for the type of genre that you are writing in—the academic argumentative research paper.
In EH 1010 and in previous lessons, we have discussed the ways in which different spheres of knowledge have different expectations about what makes for a reliable source. However, now that we are firmly rooted in the academic sphere, we need to think about audience and have audience awareness as a result.
Choosing Argument Over Opinion
Sources that you collect should make arguments based upon supporting evidence. Opinions have their place, but not in argumentative writing, such as the kind you will do in academic writing situations.
Opinion: An opinion is a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty. People can have opinions about situations—social, political, economic, etc.—without having all the facts or without weighing all the facts because an opinion can be based upon someone’s personal view, attitude, or appraisal.
EXAMPLE 1:Peanut butter is the best food.
Obviously, in this example, we can see that there are faults in the statement. After all, food preferences are highly subjective. Even if you were able to find a food expert who was willing to state that peanut butter is the best food, it would still not be sufficient evidence upon which to base an argument.
EXAMPLE 2: NASA’s Space Shuttle program was a waste of taxpayer dollars.
In this second example, you can see that there is potential for an argument here. It is not always clear what is an opinion and what is an argument. The main thing to remember is that an opinion does not have backing, but an argument does. So if we were to take the statement above and add support to it, then it could become an argument because it would then have a correlation between the evidence being presented and the statement itself.
EXAMPLE 3 (revision):NASA’s Space Shuttle program was an unreasonable use of taxpayer dollars, with the final 22 flights averaging a cost of around $1.0 billion each (Pinchefsky, 2012).
As you can see here, the above example is an argument because it supplies evidence to support its claims.
Argument: An argument can be a statement, reason, or fact for or against a point. Typically, an argument is intended to convince or persuade an audience to adopt the writer’s argument.
In both of the examples below, the writer makes an assumption about what the evidence means and asserts a claim as a result.
EXAMPLE 1:Peanut butter is an excellent source of protein, with eight grams per two tablespoons. ...
EAPP Q2-English for Acad..............pptxdarrenmuralla2
This document discusses a lesson plan for an English for Academic and Professional Purposes course. The lesson focuses on gathering manifestos and analyzing the arguments used by writers.
The objectives are to identify the concept of argumentative writing, gather manifestos and analyze the arguments used, and create arguments with supporting evidence. Various activities are outlined to analyze arguments and issues, complete statements about arguments and manifestos, and gather evidence from sources. The document provides guidance on forming arguments and considering an audience to develop logical, emotional, and ethical appeals.
The document discusses evaluating different types of information sources for college-level research. It covers periodical sources like scholarly journals, trade publications, popular magazines, and newspapers. It also discusses evaluating websites and detecting bias, confirmation bias, and fake news. The key aspects discussed are developing the skill to evaluate sources critically, using the CRAAP test to assess currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose of sources.
Similar to The answers you get depend on the questions you ask.—Thoma.docx (20)
Accident Up Ahead!Listen to this text being read aloud by a hu.docxmehek4
Accident Up Ahead!
Listen to this text being read aloud by a human being by clicking on this link.
Answer questions #1 and #2 and then answer #3 or #4.
1. When an accident or disaster occurs, many people will panic or just stand there looking. Why do they react that way? (Answer using a short paragraph.)
2. What fears and doubts does Jody have to overcome as she works? What helps her to keep going? (Answer using two short paragraphs.)
3. Write a paragraph about an accident that you experienced as a victim, an observer, or the person who helped the victim.
or
4. As one of the Fortins or Jodouins, write a letter to Jody Stevens thanking her for what she did.
Accident Up Ahead!
JANICE TYRWHITT
THE NORTHBOUND BUS had scarcely left North Bay, Ontario, when-at 1:30 a.m. on Saturday, October 11, 1975-it came to an abrupt halt. Peering out the bus window at Highway 11, Jody Stevens saw a line of taillights stretching into the night. "There must be an accident up ahead," she said to her seatmate. "I had better get out and help." Jody, a young nurse from Toronto, was on her way home to spend Thanksgiving (and celebrate her twenty-fourth birthday) with her family in Timmins. An October drizzle soaked her shoulders as she trudged past a quarter mile of stopped traffic to an eerie scene. In the flickering light of Coleman lamps and road flares, she saw the two-lane highway spattered with blood. An old school bus converted into a camper lay on its side in the ditch. A hunter's pickup truck was stalled in the left lane, the bodies of two moose lolling grotesquely from the back. Off the right shoulder was a silver Mercedes-Benz with a smashed hood. In the lane between them a silent ring of people had gathered round a fourth vehicle-a blue 1973 Ford, a crumpled wreck, with four people in it.
"I think they're all dead," a burly man told Jody.
She caught her breath and thought, Well, Stevens, what do you do now? Jody had packed a lot of experience into the two years since her graduation as a registered nurse, most recently at the Toronto East General Hospital. She threw off her corduroy coat and crawled into the back seat of the crushed car.
While Jody was riding north, twenty-six-year-old Charles Jodouin, his wife Jeanne, and her parents Omer and Lucie Fortin, were driving south from Timmins to visit Jeanne's sister in Kingston. Despite the late hour, traffic in both directions was fairly heavy. They were less than three miles out of North Bay when, suddenly, the left rear wheel spun off an oncoming converted school bus: it flew straight into the grill of a pickup truck moving south just ahead of the Jodouins. Then, out of control, the camperbus skidded across the centre line and sideswiped the Jodouins' blue Ford. A split second later a brand-new Mercedes, travelling behind the camper, also slammed into the Jodouins.
Scrambling into the wrecked blue Ford, Jody found herself in a welter of blood and splintered glass. Trapped in the driver's se.
Access the annual report provided in Course Materials to complete .docxmehek4
Access
the annual report provided in Course Materials to complete the Financial Reporting Problem, Part 1 assignment due in Week Six.
Analyze
the information contained in the company’s balance sheet and income statement to answer the following questions:
·
Are the assets included under the company’s current assets listed in the proper order? Explain your answer.
·
How are the company’s assets classified?
·
What are cash equivalents?
·
What are the company’s total current liabilities at the end of its most recent annual reporting period?
·
What are the company’s total current liabilities at the end of the previous annual reporting period?
·
Considering all the information you have gathered, why might this information be important to potential creditors, investors, and employees?
Create a table to summarize any dollar value answers. Then Summarize
the analysis in a 700- to 1,050-word paper in a Microsoft
®
Word document.
Format
your paper and presentation consistent with APA guidelines.
.
Access the Internet to acquire a copy of the most recent annual re.docxmehek4
Access
the Internet to acquire a copy of the most recent annual report for the publicly traded company used to complete the Financial Reporting Problem, Part 1 assignment due in Week Six. (In week six, I wrote about Apple’s financial report)
Analyze
the information contained in the company’s balance sheet and income statement to answer the following questions:
·
Are the assets included under the company’s current assets listed in the proper order? Explain your answer.
·
How are the company’s assets classified?
·
What are cash equivalents?
·
What are the company’s total current liabilities at the end of its most recent annual reporting period?
·
What are the company’s total current liabilities at the end of the previous annual reporting period?
·
Considering all the information you have gathered, why might this information be important to potential creditors, investors, and employees?
Summarize
the analysis in a 700- to 1,050-word paper in a Microsoft® Word document.
Include
a copy of the company’s balance sheet and income statement.
Format
your paper and presentation consistent with APA guidelines.
.
Acc 290 Final Exam MCQs) Which financial statement is used to de.docxmehek4
This document contains 29 multiple choice questions about accounting concepts and principles from an ACC 290 final exam, including questions about:
- Financial statements and the statement of cash flows
- Basic accounting equations and debits and credits
- Adjusting entries, trial balances, and calculating financial metrics like cost of goods sold
- Inventory costing methods like FIFO and LIFO
- Internal controls and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
AC2760
Week 2 Assignment
Read the following scenario, and complete the form on the following worksheet:
On March 1, 2012, Mitch Quade established Mitch Realty, which completed the following transactions during the month:
(a)
Mitch Quade transferred cash from a personal bank account to an account to be used for the business in exchange for capital stock, $18,000.
(b)
Purchase supplies on account, $1,200.
(c)
Earned sales commission, receiving cash, $14,000.
(d)
Paid rent on office and equipment for the month, $2,800.
(e)
Paid creditor on account, $750.
(f)
Paid office salaries, $3,000.
Instructions:
1
Journalize entries for transactions (a) through (f).
Omit the journal entry explanations. Please use the drop-down list (right of the cell) to enter the account description box on the worksheet.
2
Post the journal entries the T accounts, placing the appropriate letter to the left of each amount to identify the transactions.
Determine the account balance after all posting is complete.
Accounts containing only a single entry do not need a balance.
3
Prepare and unadjusted trial balance as of March 31, 2012.
1.
Journal - Mitch Realty
Description
Debit
Credit
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
2.
Ledger - Mitch Realty
Cash
Capital Stock
(a)
(d)
(a)
(c)
(e)
(f)
Sales Commission
Bal.
(c)
Supplies
Office Salaries Expense
(b)
(f)
Accounts Payable
Rent Expense
(e)
(b)
(d)
Bal.
3.
MITCH REALTY
Unadjusted Trial Balance
March 31, 2012
Debit
Credit
Cash
Supplies
Accounts Payable
Capital Stock
Sales Commissions
Rent Expense
Office Salaries Expense
-
-
.
AC1220 Lab 5.1IntroductionJake determines that owning the .docxmehek4
AC1220 Lab 5.1
Introduction
Jake determines that owning the building where Jake’s Computer Sales and Repair operates makes more sense than leasing the facility. On June 1, 20x1, Jake exchanges a $180,000 note payable for the following fixed assets:
·
Land
·
Land improvements, including fencing, paving, lighting, and signage
·
Building
Jake hires an independent appraiser who assigns the following market values to the assets:
Asset
Fair Market Value
Land
$23,500
Land improvements
$8,000
Building
$164,500
Requirement 1
Jake must allocate the $195,000 among three asset classes: land, land improvements, and building.
a. Compute the total fair market value (FMV) of the lump-sum purchase of assets.
Asset
Fair Market Value
Land
$23,500
Land improvements
8,000
Building
164,000
Total
b. Express land improvements and building as a percentage of the total FMV and allocate the purchase price of $180,000 to land improvements and building—the computation is completed for land.
Asset
Fair Market Value
% of Total Fair Market Value
Purchase Price
Cost of Asset
Land
$23,500
12%
$180,000
$21,600
Land improvements
180,000
Building
180,000
Total
c. Journalize the purchase of the assets, using the allocated costs computed in Requirement 1b.
Date
Account and Explanation
Debit
Credit
6/1/x1
To record purchase of land, land improvements, and building
Requirement 2
a. Classify each of the following spending items as either a capital expenditure or an expense. Indicate the correct choice with an “x”:
Spending
Capital Expenditure
Expense
Routine repairs to fencing, $120 (cash)
Renovation of building, including addition to warehouse, $15,000 (on account)
Resurfaced paving, extending the remaining useful life of the paving from 3 to 5 years, $1,000 (cash)
b. Journalize the expenditures described in Requirement 2a.
Date
Account and Explanation
Debit
Credit
6/1/x1
To record repairs to fencing
6/1/x1
To record renovation of building
6/1/x1
To record extraordinary repair
Requirement 3
a. Using the straight-line depreciation method, compute the depreciation expense and the accumulated depreciation that would be recorded at December 20x1. Completing the shaded cells in the following table:
Date
Asset Cost
Depreciable Cost
Straight-line Depreciation Rate
Depreciation Expense
Accumulated Depreciation
Book Value
Jun 1, 20x1
1/5 x 6/12
b. Using the double-declining balance method, compute the depreciation expense and the accumulated depreciation that would be recorded at December 20x1. Complete the shaded cells in the following table:
Date
Asset Cost
Depreciable Cost
Double-Declining Depreciation Rate
Depreciation Expense
Accumulated Depreciation
Book Value
Jun 1, 20x1
c. Assume that a truck is expected to be driven 7,000 miles through December 31, 20x1, and that each mile driven represents one production unit. Usi.
Abstract(Provide the main generalizable statement resulting .docxmehek4
Abstract
(
Provide the main generalizable
statement
resulting from the paper briefly)
Introduction
(Explain what the assignment is about to the reader briefly)
Anthropology definition
: according to Schaefer (2010) is “……………………………………………..” (p.5).
Interpretation: In your own words
Example: from your experiences
How does the discipline interface with sociology? Connect anthropology with sociology
Psychology definition
:
Interpretation:
Example:
How does it interface with sociology?
Political Science definition
:
Interpretation:
Example:
How does discipline interface with sociology?
Economics definition
:
Interpretation:
Example:
How does discipline interface with sociology?
Sociology definition
:
Interpretation:
Example:
How does discipline interface with sociology?
.
Abusive relationships are at the core of the Coetzee novel, whether .docxmehek4
Abusive relationships are at the core of the Coetzee novel, whether men and their abuse of women, individuals and their abuse of animals, and men and their abuse of other men. What does Coatzee want to convey to the reader about the nature of abuse and violence in relationships? How does he see both as emblematic of South Africa?
5 page paper on this topic above and include quotes or textual examples from the book.
.
Abraham, J., Sick, B., Anderson, J., Berg, A., Dehmer, C., & Tufano, A. (2011).
Selecting a provider: What factors influence patients' decision making?
Journal of Healthcare Management
,
56
(2), 99–114.
Chullen, C. L., Dunford, B. B., Angermeier, I., Boss, R. W., & Boss, A. D. (2011).
Minimizing deviant behavior in healthcare organizations: The effects of supportive leadership and job design
.
Journal of Healthcare Management
,
55
(6), 381–397.
Compare the two studies by analyzing their samples. Use the following questions to guide you.
What sampling design is used?
Is the sample size adequate?
How does the sample affect the validity of the conclusions of the study?
.
Abraham, J., Sick, B., Anderson, J., Berg, A., Dehmer, C., & Tufano, A. (2011).
Selecting a provider: What factors influence patients' decision making?
Journal of Healthcare Management
,
56
(2), 99–114.
·
Chullen, C. L., Dunford, B. B., Angermeier, I., Boss, R. W., & Boss, A. D. (2011).
Minimizing deviant behavior in healthcare organizations: The effects of supportive leadership and job design
.
Journal of Healthcare Management
,
55
(6), 381–397.
Compare the two studies by analyzing their samples. Use the following questions to guide you.
1.
What sampling design is used?
2.
Is the sample size adequate?
.
A.Da la correcta conjugación para cada oración.(Give the corre.docxmehek4
A.
Da la correcta conjugación para cada oración.
(Give the correct verb conjugation in F
ormal Commandfor each sentence)
.
Top of Form
1.
_______________
Ud. la cama. (hacer)
2.
______________ Uds. la mesa. (poner)
3.
______________
Ud. a tiempo. (salir)
4.
_____________
Uds. a la fiesta. (venir)
5.
_____________ Ud. la verdad. (decir)
6.
______________ Uds. a la fiesta. (ir)
7.
______________Ud. bueno. (ser)
8.
______________ Uds. la información. (saber)
9.
______________ Ud. en la clase a tiempo.
(estar)
10.
______________ Uds. respecto a sus profesores.
(dar)
11.
______________ Ud. a clase. (ir)
12.
______________ Uds. buenos. (ser)
13.
______________
Ud. el libro en la mochila. (poner)
14.
______________ Uds. de la casa a las ocho.
(salir)
15.
______________
Ud. a mi casa. (venir)
Bottom of Form
.
Abraham Lincoln is considered by many historians to be the greatest .docxmehek4
Abraham Lincoln is considered by many historians to be the greatest American President. His drive to end slavery and to unify the nation was at great personal cost. For this assignment, you will access two important primary sources authored by Abraham Lincoln.
Using the Internet, review the following primary source document:
[Lincoln, A.?]. [ca. 1863].
The Emancipation Proclamation
. Archived document, U.S. National Archives & Records Administration. Retrieved from
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/featured_documents/
emancipation_proclamation/transcript.html
In addition, research the Internet for
The Gettysburg Address.
The
Webliography
for this module contains a link to this resource.
Based on your analysis of all the readings for this module, respond to the following:
What is Lincoln’s perception of liberty and equality?
Why did he place so much importance on the destruction of slavery and the continuation of one nation?
What examples from both documents demonstrate both civil liberties and rights?
Support your statements with appropriate scholarly references.
Write your initial response in a minimum of 300 words. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.
.
About half of the paid lobbyists in Washington are former government.docxmehek4
About half of the paid lobbyists in Washington are former government staff members or former members of Congress. Why would interest groups employ such people? Why might some reformers want to limit the ability of interest groups to employ them? On what basis might an interest group argue that such limits are unconstitutional?
.
ABC sells 400 shares of its $23 par common stock for $27. The entry .docxmehek4
ABC sells 400 shares of its $23 par common stock for $27. The entry would entail credit(s. to __________.
A. Cash for $9,200
B. Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par-Common for $800; Common Stock for $10,800
C. Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par-Common for $1,600; Common Stock for $9,200
D. Common Stock for $10,800
.
ABC company is increasing its equity by selling additional shares to.docxmehek4
ABC company is increasing its equity by selling additional shares to the public and also by converting its retained earnings. The total amount to be raised is $1,000. Given that the size of retained earnings is $300, how much should be raised externally (by issuing new shares)?
a) $700 b) $705 c) $1,000 d) $1,005 e) $300
.
A.The unification of previously fractious and divided Arab tribes.docxmehek4
A.
The unification of previously fractious and divided Arab tribes
B.
The capitulation of Jewish and Christian leaders
C.
Direct military assistance from the Sasanid state
D.
The exhaustion of the Byzantine Empire after Pyrrhic victories over the Ostrogoths and Vandals
.
A.Escribe la forma correcta del verbo en españolNosotros siem.docxmehek4
A. Escribe la forma correcta del verbo en español
Nosotros siempre_____________coca cola con la pizza. (drink)
Tú ________________________________ en Buenos Aires. (live)
Ellos ______________________________el pastel. (divide)
Yo _________________________la comida mexicana. (eat)
Paco ________________________el dinero en la caja. (hides)
Vosotros __________________________estudiar. (should)
Ramón y Carlos _______________________en el parque. (run)
La maestra __________________________ la puerta. (opens)
Yo _______________________el cuatro de Pedro. (describe)
Él _________________________el carro. (sells)
Tú ___________________un regalo para tu cumpleaños. (receive)
Los estudiantes______________________el libro. (read)
Vosotros ________________________a la clase de arte. (attend)
Ella ___________________________hacer la tarea. (promises)
Alejandra y yo ___________________a hablar español. (learn)
El hombre ____________________descubre el tesoro. (discovers)
Uds. ________________________las escaleras. (go up, climb)
Ud. ________________________el examen. (cover)
El niño _________________________la ventana. (breaks)
Las mujeres_________________________en Dios. (believe)
Escribe en español
We drink milk. _________________________________________
He breaks the window.____________________________________
They open the door.______________________________________
You (pl. Spain) promise to write.____________________________
I learn to speak Spanish.___________________________________
Contesta las preguntas
¿Dónde vives?____________________________________________
¿Lees muchos libros?______________________________________
¿Comes mucha comida mexicana?____________________________
¿Debes estudiar todos los días?_______________________________
¿Recibes buenas notas en todas tus clases?______________________
.
A.Both countries fought for independence from Great Britain, b.docxmehek4
A
.
Both countries fought for independence from Great Britain, but the United States won, and China did not.
B
.
Both countries were colonized, but the United States went on to become a major imperial power, and China did not.
C
.
Both countries established colonies in India, but the United States established commercial control, and China did not.
D
.
Both countries established colonies in the Caribbean, but the United States’ colonies rebelled, and China’s did not.
.
a.A patent purchased from J. Miller on January 1, 2010, for a ca.docxmehek4
a.
A patent purchased from J. Miller on January 1, 2010, for a cash cost of $5,640. When purchased, the patent had an estimated life of fifteen years.
b.
A trademark was registered with the federal government for $10,000. Management estimated that the trademark could be worth as much as $200,000 because it has an indefinite life.
c.
Computer licensing rights were purchased on January 1, 2010, for $60,000. The rights are expected to have a four-year useful life to the company.
Compute the acquisition cost of each intangible asset.
patent
trademark
licensing rights
.
A.) Imagine that astronomers have discovered intelligent life in a n.docxmehek4
A.) Imagine that astronomers have discovered intelligent life in a nearby star system. Imagine you are part of a group submitting a proposal for who on Earth should speak for the planet and what 50-word message should be conveyed. Be sure to answer all three questions below, if you choose this option.
(A) Who should speak for Earth and why?
(B) What should this person say in 50 words?
(C) Why is this message the most important compared to other things that could be said?
Instructions: should be at least 200 words.
B.) Observing Jupiter’s Moons
Big Idea: Sky objects have properties, locations, and predictable patterns of movements that can be observed and described.
Goal: Students will conduct a series of inquiries about the position and motion of Jupiter’s moons using prescribed Internet simulations.
Computer Setup:
Access http://space.jpl.nasa.gov/ and
a) Select THE MOON in the “Show me _______ “ drop down menu
b) Select THE SUN in the “as seen from _______ “ drop down menu
c) Select the radio button “I want a field of view of ____ degrees” and set the drop down menu to 0.5
d) Select the check box for EXTRA BRIGHTNESS and then Select “Run Simulator”
Phase I: Exploration
1) The resulting image shows what one would see looking through a special telescope. In this picture, where is the observer with the special telescope located?
2) How does the image change if you INCREASE the field of view?
3) What is the exact date of the image?
4) Astronomers typically mark images based on the time it currently is in Greenwich, England, called UTC. What is the precise time of the image?
5) Using a ruler to measure the distance on the screen between the middle of Earth and the middle of the Moon, what is the measured distance? You do NOT need to know the exact number of kilometers, but simply a ruler-measurement you can compare other measurements you make later. Alternately, you can use the edge of a blank piece of paper held in the landscape orientation and mark the positions of Earth and Moon or the Squidgit ruler found on the last page.
6) Use the browser’s BACK button to return to the Solar System Simulator homepage. Now, advance the time by 1 hour and determine the new distance between the Earth and Moon.
7) Use the browser’s BACK button to return to the Solar System Simulator homepage. Now, advance the time by one day from when you started and determine the new distance between the Earth and Moon.
8) Use the browser’s BACK button to return to the Solar System Simulator homepage. Now, advance the time by three days from when you started and determine the new distance between the Earth and Moon.
9) Use the browser’s BACK button to return to the Solar System Simulator homepage. Now, advance the time by five days from when you started and determine the new distance between the Earth and Moon.
10) Use the browser’s BACK button to return to the Solar System Simulator homepage. Now, advance the time by 10 days from when you s.
Physiology and chemistry of skin and pigmentation, hairs, scalp, lips and nail, Cleansing cream, Lotions, Face powders, Face packs, Lipsticks, Bath products, soaps and baby product,
Preparation and standardization of the following : Tonic, Bleaches, Dentifrices and Mouth washes & Tooth Pastes, Cosmetics for Nails.
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
The answers you get depend on the questions you ask.—Thoma.docx
1. The answers you get depend on the questions you ask.
—Thomas Kuhn
Learning Objectives
After reading this chapter, you
should be able to:
1. Distinguish between scholarly and
popular sources and decide when and
how to use each type.
2. Analyze your research needs using a
simple mnemonic: BEAM.
3. Write and analyze a research question
that will make it much easier for you
to formulate search terms and find
the best sources for your project.
4. Find, locate, and choose the right
research databases to help you
answer your research questions.
5. Search databases efficiently to pro-
duce useful results.
3Finding Good Sources
Jupiterimages/BananaStock/Thinkstock
2. dro85866_03_c03.indd 35 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Section 3.1 Distinguishing Between Scholarly,
News, Trade, and Popular Sources
During the second phase of your research, you will locate
researchers working on the
essential and supporting research questions you wrote in Phase I
so that you can use their
findings and ideas as evidence in an argument, as well as
contribute to the conversation
they are having.
If you have been working on Phase I, you already have some of
the skills necessary to
locate research conversations using Google Scholar and its
“Cited by” and “Related arti-
cles” links. In Phase II, you will continue working with Google
Scholar and also with more
subject-specific databases available to you through your
university or community library.
We will work on database selection, search strategies, and
search results analysis early in
this chapter. Later in the chapter, we will discuss evaluating and
working with the sources
you find.
With a well-designed research project in hand, it is time to get
down to the nuts and bolts
of one of the most important elements of the research process:
finding useful sources and
working to understand them—and what you can do with them—
once you have them.
In this chapter, you will learn everything you need to know
3. about library databases and
search construction in order to find, understand, analyze, and
use a coherent set of cred-
ible, relevant, reliable sources with which to work.
3.1 Distinguishing Between Scholarly, News,
Trade, and Popular Sources
As you start the work of the second phase of your research, it is
important to under-stand the difference between two major
types of sources: scholarly sources and news, trade, and popular
sources. While each kind of source can contain useful
information and interesting perspectives, they have different
kinds of authority, which
determine how you can use them in academic research.
Scholarly Sources
Scholarly sources are produced by professional researchers
seeking to advance or evalu-
ate knowledge, who submit their work for peer review. As you
learned in Chapter 1, peer
review certifies the rigor of the research process and the
reasonableness of the researcher’s
argument and interpretations. In order to be scholarly, both
journal articles and books
need to be peer reviewed. Most databases of sources will
provide you with the option to
restrict your searches to scholarly sources. But if not, you can
recognize scholarly sources
by asking yourself the following questions:
1. Is the writer of the source a credentialed professional
researcher writing in his
or her field of expertise?
2. Has the source been successfully reviewed by peers?
4. dro85866_03_c03.indd 36 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Section 3.1 Distinguishing Between Scholarly,
News, Trade, and Popular Sources
3. Is the purpose of the
source to advance or
evaluate knowledge?
4. Does the source use an
extensive citation system
to document its own
sources of evidence and
its engagement with
other researchers?
5. Is the source published in
an academic journal or by
an academic or university
press?
If you answered “yes” to the ques-
tions on this list, then it is likely that
the source is scholarly. If not, then
likely you have a news, trade, or
popular source.
News, Trade, and Popular Sources
News, trade, and popular sources are produced by journalists,
freelance writers, colum-
nists, magazine writers, or practitioners of a trade. Unlike
scholarly sources, they are not
subject to scholarly peer review by credentialed experts,
5. although they may be subject
to editorial review or review by other industry practitioners.
News sources tend to be
published in newspapers or magazines such as the Los Angeles
Times, Time Magazine, or
U.S. News & Weekly Report. Written by journalists, their
purpose is to report and analyze
current events. Trade sources tend to be published in journals or
magazines intended to
be read by executives or practitioners working in a specific
industry. For example, the
trade magazine R&D is read by research and development
executives, project managers,
scientists, and engineers. While trade sources provide useful
information to their read-
ers, they tend to reflect the perspectives of the industry they
serve, rather than seeking to
advance or evaluate knowledge. Popular sources are written to
educate or entertain, by
writers who often are not experts in the field. They tend not to
use specialized language
or require any previous knowledge to read. Magazines such as
People and Reader’s Digest
are examples of popular sources.
You will be able to recognize whether you are working with a
news, trade, or popular
source by asking yourself the following questions:
1. Is the writer a journalist, a freelancer, a columnist, a
practitioner of a trade,
or a magazine staffer?
2. Is the purpose of the source to report news or opinion; to earn
money; to
advertise a product or service; to educate a general audience; to
7. Writer A credentialed professional
researcher writing in his or her field
of expertise.
A journalist, a freelancer, a
columnist or pundit, a practitioner
of a trade, or a magazine staffer.
Peer reviewed Yes No
Purpose To advance or evaluate knowledge. To report news or
opinion; to earn
money; to advertise a product
or service; to educate a general
audience; to persuade readers to
hold an opinion, support a policy, or
make a judgment; to entertain.
Citation system Extensive. Used to document
evidence and engagement with
other sources.
Absent or minimal. Readers have
no or minimal ways of verifying
assertions.
Publication type Academic journal. Book published
by an academic press.
News or opinion. Trade magazine.
Popular magazine.
Keep in mind that if you misidentify what type of source you
have, you will undermine
your credibility as a reliable researcher, you may misuse your
8. source, and your arguments
will be less persuasive.
Using Scholarly and Popular Sources
Now that you know how to distinguish between scholarly
sources and popular sources,
it is important to understand how to use each kind of source in
your research. Whether
scholarly or popular, sources need to be credible to be used in
your research. Credible
sources, as we discussed in Chapter 1, offer relevant evidence
for their claims and are
offered by well-informed people motivated to pursue the truth.
Since scholarly sources
are designed to be credible from the start, you are on firm
ground using them in a variety
of ways in your research. Be sure, however, to determine
whether the researcher is writ-
ing about his or her field of special expertise. Someone who
holds a Ph.D. in history, for
example, likely does not have the expertise to produce scholarly
research on the environ-
mental causes of Honeybee Colony Collapse Disorder. We will
explore more sophisticated
dro85866_03_c03.indd 38 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Section 3.1 Distinguishing Between Scholarly,
News, Trade, and Popular Sources
ways to use scholarly research later in this chapter. But for now,
you should understand
that they can provide you with:
9. • Authoritative information and data;
• Important concepts and methods to use to analyze and
interpret data;
• Credible, valid, and reliable arguments to consider and to
which to respond;
• Names of other scholars working in the fields and the titles of
their publica-
tions; and
• Criticisms and evaluations of other researchers’ published
work.
In order for popular sources to be credible, you must assess
whether they are biased or
motivated by something other than pursuit of the truth before
you use them. You should
not use sources that are written primarily to advertise a product
or service or to entertain.
Likewise, you should not use sources written by writers whose
deeply held beliefs are
affecting their ability to meet the scholarly standards of
fairness, accuracy, open-minded-
ness, and, therefore, their ability to consider alternative
explanations and points of view.
If you do determine that popular sources are credible, you can
use them in limited ways
in your research, mostly at the beginning of your project, when
you are trying to get up to
speed in a new area of learning.
You can reasonably use popular sources to:
• Represent the conventional wisdom or popular view of a topic,
which your
research will evaluate and replace with a more scholarly view;
10. • Get a provisional overview of the issues involved in your
topic, with the
expectation that as you learn more, you will replace this
overview with a bet-
ter one drawn from your reading in scholarly sources;
• Get a provisional overview of any history or context that
might be relevant
to your topic, with the expectation that you will replace this
overview with a
better one drawn from your reading in scholarly sources;
• Locate the names of some expert researchers working in fields
relevant to
your topic;
• Learn which fields of study or academic disciplines are
relevant to your topic;
• Learn some of the specialized vocabulary that researchers use
to discuss your
topic;
• Help you ask questions about your topic and determine what
else you need
to learn; and
• Provide you with ideas about what kinds of statistics, data, or
cases you
might need to find to be qualified to write on the topic.
A final word on scholarly and popular sources: For the research
project on which you are
working, you will need to work extensively and critically with
scholarly sources. As you
learn more about your topic and start to think more carefully
11. about the questions to which
you are seeking answers, you should spend more time working
with scholarly sources
and less with popular sources.
dro85866_03_c03.indd 39 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Section 3.2 BEAM: A Commonsense Way of
Thinking About Sources
3.2 BEAM: A Commonsense Way of Thinking About Sources
In order to design the most useful set of sources for your
project, you must have sources that will meet your needs as a
writer, as well as ones that meet your information needs.
Traditionally, students have been taught that they need
“primary” sources and “sec-
ondary” sources. But, as Boston University writing professor
Joseph Bizup (2008) argues,
the traditional “primary” source/”secondary” source language is
too abstract to tell new
researchers very much about what to look for in sources. Bizup
replaces primary and
secondary source types with everyday terms that describe how
writers use sources in
their texts: to provide background, offer exhibits, engage in
arguments, and describe methods.
Bizup collects these uses in the mnemonic BEAM, shown in
Figure 3.1.
Figure 3.1: Joseph Bizup’s BEAM
The BEAM method of employing sources.
Source: Adapted from Bizup, J. (2008). BEAM: A rhetorical
12. vocabulary for teaching research-based writing. Rhetoric
Review, 27(1), 72–86.
Ways to
Use Sources
Argument
Background
Exhibit
Method
Gives Context
Defines Initiating Puzzle or Viewpoint
Provides Grounding Facts or Perspectives
Establishes Conversants and Their Positions
Writers Rely on Background: Readers Accept
it Tentatively
Authorize your work
Borrow a Concept, Procedure, or Perspective
Writers Follow Methods; Readers Assess the
Utility and Influence Of Them
Writers Engage Arguments; Readers Evaluate
Them or Consider Their Implications
Acknowledges Previous Conversants, Their
Positions, and Significance
Needs to be Analyzed
Must be Interpreted for Meaning and Significance
Susceptible to Multiple Analyses and Interpretations
13. Writers Analyze and Interpret Exhibits in Support of
Claims; Readers Test and Think Along with Them
Provides Illustration or Test Case of a More
General Question or Argument
Engage Previous Conversants
and Their Positions
Dissent from Them
Refine Them
Illustrate Them
Take Another Side
from Them
Uncover Their Values
or Assumptions
Borrow Them
Extend or Build
on Them
Affirm Them
dro85866_03_c03.indd 40 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Section 3.2 BEAM: A Commonsense Way of
Thinking About Sources
BEAM is useful because it can help you assess your set of
sources to see how well they
meet your needs as a writer. Writers of research essays seek to
persuade readers of the
truth of a proposition by offering context-sensitive, evidence-
supported claims, careful
analysis, and plausible interpretations. You will need to assure
your reader that:
14. • You understand the larger context in which your work is
situated,
• Your claims are well-supported by evidence,
• You have interpreted your evidence reliably using sound
methods and rel-
evant concepts, and
• You have considered the views, analyses, and interpretations
of other
researchers working in the field.
The “B” in BEAM: Background Sources
Because you will not be the first researcher working on your
topic, you will need sources
that enable you to formulate your research questions against a
background of significant
facts and previous ideas on the subject. According to Bizup,
background sources provide
“materials whose claims a writer accepts as fact, whether these
‘facts’ are taken as gen-
eral information or deployed as evidence to support the writer’s
own assertions” (p. 75).
Background sources enable you to pro-
vide context, show how other research-
ers and public commentators have seen
the problem or issue under study, and
summarize the current state of research
on your topic.
They also enable you to prepare your
reader to understand where your spe-
cific line of inquiry fits in the larger
research conversation. By demonstrat-
ing that you have read and understood
15. the existing literature, they also help
you establish your qualifications for writing about your topic.
In the following passage
from her research project description, Emma is deploying her
sources as background. In
just two sentences, she establishes the scholarly foundation on
which her research stands:
Recent work by sociologists of technology argues that teens’
use of social
network sites such as Facebook has much more to do with their
develop-
mental needs as emerging adults. According to researchers such
as boyd
(2008), Livingstone (2008), and Stald (2008), teens use social
network sites
to seek status, experiment with identities, and separate from
parental
influence.
At this point in her essay, Emma expects readers simply to
accept the views of these
researchers as authoritative. That is why she provides their
credentials (“sociologists of
technology”) and references to their scholarly papers.
A writer relies on background sources to pro-
vide context and to help delineate an initiat-
ing puzzle or question. Writers expect readers
to accept them as authoritative.
dro85866_03_c03.indd 41 10/2/13 2:31 PM
16. CHAPTER 3Section 3.2 BEAM: A Commonsense Way of
Thinking About Sources
The “E” in BEAM: Exhibits
Because readers of research essays expect your claims to be
supported with evidence, you
will need to illustrate your ideas and judgments using concrete
data, cases, or examples.
Bizup calls these materials “exhibits” (p. 75). The term
“exhibit” is most often heard in the
world of courtrooms. In criminal courts, prosecutors offer
exhibits (evidence) to a jury in
order to make a case that a particular perpetrator is guilty. In
order to persuade the jury to
see the exhibit as evidence of guilt, the prosecutor will need to
analyze and interpret the
exhibit to help the jury understand its larger significance, or to
enable them to see it as
suggestive of motivations.
Like prosecutors, research writers offer
exhibits to readers as suggestive objects
to think with and about on their way to
drawing a conclusion. Because exhibits
do not speak for themselves, and differ-
ent viewers might see them differently,
writers must analyze, explain, and inter-
pret them for their readers.
To help you better understand what an
exhibit is and how researchers use them
in their writing, consider an example
from a piece of research Emma found on
how young adults relate to their mobile
17. phones. Researcher Gitte Stald (2008)
asked 16-year-old students to write essays called “My Mobile
and Me.” Then she ana-
lyzed the essays as exhibits in support of her thesis that mobile
phones are more than just
communications tools—they are also personal development
tools. Here is the passage
with Stald’s thesis underlined, her exhibit marked in bold, and
her analysis and interpre-
tation double-underlined:
We should consider the meaning of “mobile” as . . . being ready
for change, ready to
go in new directions. One of the sixteen-year-old participants . .
. had been
considering the ontological meaning of “mobile” and looked it
up in her
mother’s dictionary. . . . She found that it said: “Movable, agile,
able to be
moved or transported easily and fast; ready to march, ready for
battle.”
She was somewhat surprised by the last two translations of
“mobile,” and
concluded that in fact that is exactly what she is with her
mobile [phone]
at hand: “I am easily accessed and I am movable; I am agile and
transport
myself easily and quite fast; I am always ready to receive a
message or a
call; but best of all I am ready to march, ready for battle! . . .”
This girl inter-
prets mobile as more than a matter of physical movement
between locations, she
thinks of herself as physically on the move, supported by her
mobile [phone], but at
18. the same time she applies the military terminology to her own
situation and her inter-
est in moving forward in life and battling for herself in more
than physical terms.
The mobile [phone] facilitates her social mobility and readiness
to communicate.
Exchange between friends is an important part of the
development of identity. . . .
In this context, being movable, agile and ready to march means
being ready to
move as a person, too. (Stald, 2008, pp. 145–146)
Writers analyze and interpret exhibits to
make them significant and meaningful to
readers. Writers expect readers to think along
with their analysis and interpretation, with
the understanding that readers will think
critically and skeptically about the writer’s
analysis and interpretation.
dro85866_03_c03.indd 42 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Section 3.2 BEAM: A Commonsense Way of
Thinking About Sources
Stald’s exhibit is presented in enough detail so that a reader can
quickly see its relevance
to her thesis. Notice also that she does not assume that the girl’s
19. essay speaks for itself.
Stald follows her exhibit with analysis and interpretation,
calling readers’ attention to the
keywords and significant aspects of the exhibit.
The “A” in BEAM: Argument Sources
Throughout this book, we have asked you to see research as a
conversation. When you
read and write research, you are in dialogue with other
researchers, with whom you must
agree or disagree, and on whose work you build or refute. So
when you look for sources,
you need to look for sources that offer you a perspective on the
topic. Such sources are
called argument sources. Argument sources provide you with
“claims . . . [to] affirm,
dispute, refine, or extend” (Bizup, 2008,
p. 76). Commenting on the usefulness
and limits of other researchers’ claims
(instead of just borrowing their data) not
only helps you refine your own view as
you account for the views of others who
may disagree with you; it also helps
you anticipate potential criticisms of
your interpretation, and to develop the
sophistication of your claims.
In the following passage from Emma’s emerging essay, she
wants to criticize and refine
the ideas of John Palfrey, a writer who believes that today’s
technologically connected
teens are categorically different from the teens of previous
generations. Emma starts by
conveying Palfrey’s idea in a fair and balanced manner, and at
the same time signals her
disagreement, which is highlighted in bold:
20. Even John Palfrey (2008) admits that teens today “establish and
communi-
cate their identities simultaneously in the physical and digital
worlds” (p.
20). Unfortunately in boiling things down, Palfrey misplaces the
empha-
sis, writing “the net effect of the digital age—paradoxically—is
to decrease
[a girl’s] ability to control her social identity and how others
perceive her”
(pp. 19–20). However, while the Internet has made the
adolescent matu-
ration process more public, it has done little to change how
much control
adolescents have over the essential process of how they
establish and
manage their identities. Teens have always had to negotiate
their identi-
ties in a dynamic social environment where how they are viewed
by oth-
ers shapes their sense of self.
By using transition tags, such as “unfortunately” and
“however,” Emma alerts her reader
to see her perspective as an argument that counters Palfrey’s
view.
Writers engage the arguments (claims, sup-
port, and reasoning) of other writers. Readers
test, evaluate, and consider the implications
of a writer’s argument.
21. dro85866_03_c03.indd 43 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Section 3.3 Finding Sources
The “M” in BEAM: Method Sources
Some of the persuasiveness of a research essay rests on the
assurance that the researcher has
followed a reasonable method of finding, analyzing, and
interpreting exhibits. Research-
ers develop reliable ways of working with data and cases to
draw reasonable conclusions.
According to Bizup, method sources “can offer a set of key
terms, lay out a particular pro-
cedure, or furnish a general model or perspective” (p. 76). They
ensure that the researcher’s
general approach and foundational concepts are sound. When
you want to know whether
another researcher’s claim is statistically significant, you are
asking about his or her meth-
ods. When you analyze a researcher’s survey to see which
populations it represents, and
which it does not, you are assessing his or her methods. As a
researcher, you should not
only adopt and follow a method for analyzing and interpreting
data, but you should
also reflect on the implications of your
own methods, and assess the utility and
influence of other researchers’ method-
ological choices on their conclusions.
For the purposes of your research, your
method is a systematic critical synthesis
of previous research called a literature
22. review.
As you use BEAM to choose a set of sources that will enable
you to meet your needs as
a writer, keep in mind that you may need multiple examples of
all four kinds of sources,
and that any single source likely provides you with more than
one kind of material for
your project.
3.3 Finding Sources
In our experience, student researchers who struggle to find
sources do so because:1. They are searching some-
what randomly for “gen-
eral information” about a
topic, and/or
2. They are not aware of
the important differ-
ences between search-
ing web portals such as
Google and searching the
subscription databases
found in most academic
libraries.
In this section, you will learn how to
overcome these problems and find
the sources you need.
“Writers follow methods” (Bizup, 2008,
p. 76). Readers assess the utility and influence
of methods.
23. Blend Images/SuperStock
Sources can be found in various ways, such as searching
for keywords online or using databases provided by an
academic library.
dro85866_03_c03.indd 44 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Section 3.3 Finding Sources
Starting Research in a New Field
Starting research on a topic in an entirely new field presents
researchers with a significant
problem—namely, they do not know enough about the topic or
field to know what they
need to learn. In other words, they do not yet know the
questions that other researchers
have asked. They do not know the specialized vocabulary that
has evolved. They do not
yet know what aspect of the topic on which they want to work.
It is very likely that as an
undergraduate, you are facing the same problem with your
current project. It seems natu-
ral that the first thing that you should do is to fire up your
browser, log in to a database,
and search away to find something, anything, to get your feet
wet. But that is a counter-
productive way to start acquiring the basic knowledge that you
will need in order to find
a useful set of sources and frame a set of questions.
Instead, you need to look for a short overview of the topic that
will orient you to some of the
driving concerns of the field. If you are conducting research for
24. a college course, it is likely
that some of your course materials can provide you with at least
some of what you need.
Course textbooks are especially good resources for surveying
the breadth of a subject and
acquiring the specialized language of the field. Mining them for
concepts and exhibits
can provide you both with search terms you can use right away
and clues for developing
others. Also consult lecture notes, handouts and slides, and
assigned or recommended
readings. If your readings are scholarly, review the sources
listed on their references pages
to locate the names of researchers working in your field and key
concepts. Once you are
searching the databases, try a few searches that include the term
“review of the literature”
with your topic to see if you can find an article that summarizes
and evaluates recent
research in the field.
Besides looking at course materials, you can also consult
specialized encyclopedias,
subject-specific dictionaries, and topic bibliographies. The
reference sections of most aca-
demic libraries stock a wide range of these helpful orienting
texts. Many libraries also
provide librarian-prepared subject guides to often-used fields to
help you identify the
most useful orienting texts, bibliographic tools, and databases.
Fields with subject guides
include anthropology, company/industry research, criminal
justice and law enforcement,
early childhood education, heathcare administration, and
literature. You can find these
and more subject guides in tutorials on your university or local
25. library websites. Often,
you can also call, email, or chat online with a librarian for help
deciding which ones might
be of most use to you.
Assessing Your Research Needs
Once you have a basic overview of your topic, the first step in
finding a coherent set of
useful sources is to assess your research needs. With Bizup’s
BEAM mnemonic, you know
that you will need (a) background sources, (b) exhibit sources,
(c) argument sources, and
(d) method sources. That is useful as far as it goes, but it does
not go far enough to help
you choose the right databases for your specific project or to
search them effectively. If you
have completed the project design work in Chapter 2 (gathering
an overview of your topic
using course materials, subject-specific encyclopedias and
dictionaries, and topic-specific
bibliographies), you have already performed some of the
preliminary steps necessary to
assess your research needs. In particular, the initial set of
questions you wrote will be a pri-
mary resource for your first targeted foray into the literature. If
you are still in the design
phase of your project, do not worry. This section will help you
get your project started well.
dro85866_03_c03.indd 45 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Section 3.3 Finding Sources
Developing a Set of Research Questions
26. The key to finding useful sources for your project is to approach
a database session with
good questions in hand. In Chapter 2, you learned that research
projects tend to have two
different types of questions: essential questions that prompt you
to investigate perplex-
ing phenomenon or solve complex problems, and supporting
questions that guide you to
find the material you need to answer your essential questions.
You also learned that good
questions should have a specific scope, which means they
should clearly specify which
populations, locations, time periods, subtopics, and theories are
relevant to your question.
If you have not written any essential or supporting research
questions, you will need to do
so before approaching the database. Go back to Chapter 2 and
work through the activities
in Section 2.3 to develop your project definition, topic, and
research questions.
Constructing Effective Search Queries
Once you have good research questions, you must learn how to
use them to query the
database. If you have a lot of experience searching the Internet,
you likely use natural
language—language that looks and sounds like the language we
use in everyday situa-
tions—to search for what you want to find. The following
search queries are written in
natural language:
• “What is the best Chinese restaurant in St. Paul?”
• “How can I catch more fish?”
• “What are some ways to help my child who does not like to
read?”
27. On the Internet, natural language searches tend to work well
enough to allow you to
find what you want without too much effort. But if you query a
research database using
natural language, you will likely find that you get few or no
results. What is more, the few
results you get may be irrelevant because research databases are
organized using the same
categories and logic that organize the content of research
libraries. As a result, databases
“speak” a language that allows you to search and find more than
just the specific title for
which you were looking. It allows you to find clusters of related
content as well. So in
order to search academic library catalogs and academic
databases well, you have to learn
how to construct searches that the system can process.
Search construction involves analyzing your research question
to identify potential search
terms, refining the question by specifying the relationship
between key terms, and finding
synonyms for keywords that may be too imprecise to generate
sources that are relevant to
your project. To learn how to construct effective search queries,
let us discuss each part of
this process by analyzing the last research question on our list:
“What are some ways to
help my child who does not like to read?”
Step 1: Identify keywords or concepts in the research question.
Likely two keywords leap out at you: child, read. So you write
them down on a research
log form like the one shown in the Sample Research Log. While
28. you could go directly to a
multipurpose database and enter those two terms in a keyword
search, you would likely
get thousands of results. Only a few of them would be closely
relevant to your question
because there are many different possible relationships between
your two keywords,
dro85866_03_c03.indd 46 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Section 3.3 Finding Sources
and you have not yet specified the relationship between them.
Without specifying the rela-
tionship between them, the database cannot tell if you are an
elementary school teacher
wanting sources on how to teach very young children to learn to
read for the first time, a
memoirist writing about the value of her time spent reading as a
child, or a concerned par-
ent wanting information on how to motivate your adolescent
boy to enjoy reading more.
Step 2: Specify the relationship between keywords.
The first thing to do is to go back to the original question and
see whether you can find
additional keywords that better specify the relationship between
child and read. Here is
the question again: “What are some ways to help my child who
doesn’t like to read?”
A second look at the question reveals two additional key
phrases that indicate a very
specific relationship between child and read: We have a child
29. who does not like to read, and
a parent who wants ways to help him or her. Notice how this
reformulation of the ques-
tion brings in a new keyword: parent. By finding the additional
phrases that specify the
relationship between our keywords, we have arrived at a better
understanding of what
it is we are looking for. Developing and refining your question
is not only a key strategy
for generating more productive search combinations; it also
helps you better understand
your research needs. If you are lucky, it can help you develop
some other closely related
research questions.
Step 3: Refine imprecise keywords by finding synonyms.
Adding new keywords and phrases to the search seems like it
should help the database
return sources that more specifically address your concerns, and
to a degree it will. But
you will not find everything written on the topic, and you may
find nothing at all. This
is because two of the primary keywords (child and parent) have
multiple synonyms. Fur-
thermore, two of the key phrases (ways to help and does not
like) express relationships in
everyday language that expert researchers would find too
imprecise to use in their arti-
cles. Since researchers try to use language carefully and
precisely to represent accurately
the problems, data, and solutions on which they are working,
you will need to produce
a list of more precise synonyms that researchers might use for
each of your keywords or
phrases. Remember, different writers might choose different
30. terms to convey the same
idea. So you will need to develop and test several different
combinations of search terms
to locate all of the most relevant sources for your query.
Let us continue with our example by refining our imprecise
terms—ways to help and does
not like. You can use a dictionary or thesaurus to help find
synonyms, but you may get bet-
ter, more efficient results by using the materials you found
earlier during your grounding
research in specialized dictionaries and encyclopedias to guide
your synonym develop-
ment. Here is what a standard thesaurus suggests as potential
synonyms for ways: habits,
conduct, customs, behavior, traditions. None of these terms gets
at what you want to find out.
In everyday language, you are looking for advice or techniques
to motivate your child. In
your grounding research, researchers call teaching techniques
methods or pedagogies. Here
is the cluster of terms we have developed for ways to help:
advice, techniques, methods, peda-
gogies. By stepping through a similar synonym development
process, we can replace does
not like with reluctant, resistant, unenthusiastic, averse,
unwilling.
Child might seem like a specific enough term, but there are
several others that researchers
might use. Youth, adolescent, teen, tween, juvenile, and kids are
just some of the possibilities.
dro85866_03_c03.indd 47 10/2/13 2:31 PM
31. CHAPTER 3Section 3.3 Finding Sources
Considering that more boys than girls seem to become reluctant
readers, your list should
probably include gendered terms for child as well: boy, son,
young man, male.
Sample Research Log
What are your research questions?
“What are some ways to help my child who doesn't like to
read?”
What are the keywords and concepts in your questions?
child, read, ways to help, doesn't like, (parent)
What are some synonyms and related words for the key words
and concepts in your questions?
child: youth, adolescent, teen, tween, juvenile, kids
ways to help: advice, techniques, methods, pedagogies
doesn't like: reluctant, resistant, unenthusiastic, averse,
unwilling
Research Log
After all this question development, we can rewrite our original
question in a much more
specific way:
“What methods, techniques, or pedagogies can parents use to
motivate
teenage male reluctant readers?”
32. With such a specific question, you will find a reasonably small
number of sources to
review, and the majority of sources you locate should be
relevant.
Choosing Databases
Once you have identified keywords and phrases and their
variants, you are ready to
approach a research database to do some searching. Before you
can search, you need to
decide which databases to choose to search (see Figure 3.2 for
factors that can help you
choose an appropriate database). Many libraries have made it
simpler for you to know
which ones to choose by listing databases by subject and
describing contents. They have
also provided subject guides to reliable resources for several
disciplines, including anthro-
pology, company and industry research, criminal justice and law
enforcement, early child-
hood education, healthcare administration, and literature. These
subject guides contain
useful database recommendations as well as the names of useful
subject specific resources,
including reference books, dictionaries, encyclopedias, and
more.
dro85866_03_c03.indd 48 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Section 3.3 Finding Sources
Database Categories
For the purposes of your research project, you need to be able to
33. distinguish between two
major categories of database. The first, known as a general
purpose database (or multidis-
ciplinary database), is often a good place to start your research
because it indexes many
different fields or disciplines. But while this type of database
offers breadth, it can sacri-
fice depth. In order to bring you a wide sample of research
being done in so many fields,
general purpose databases tend to focus on the major journals in
the field. EBSCOhost’s
Academic Search Premier and ProQuest are good examples of
general purpose databases
widely used by college students.
Figure 3.2: Choosing a database
Choosing a
Database
Coverage
Is the database subject specific or general?
Does it emphasize scholarly or popular sources?
Currency
How current are the publications indexed in the database?
How far back into the publication history does the database
cover?
Is access free or fee-based?
Is electronic delivery of materials available?Availability
Does the database offer full text, abstracts, or citations?Record
Types
On the other hand, subject-specific databases (also known as
34. field-specific databases) aim
to represent the full range of a particular field or subject. If you
do not find what you
need in a general database, or if you suspect there is more to the
topic than is covered in
a general database, you should consult a subject-specific
database such as Westlaw (law
and business), Sage Journals Online (social sciences),
PyschArticles (psychology), ERIC
(education), PubMED (medicine and healthcare), or the MLA
International Bibliography
(literature). It is important to understand that no one database
can serve all your research
needs. You will need to try your searches in multiple databases
to discover the best sources
for your project. Be sure to record on your research log which
databases provide you with
the best results for each of your searches.
Further Considerations When Choosing a Database
As you continue to consider which databases to choose for your
research, the following
questions could influence your choice:
1. Does the database provide full-text access to sources or only
abstracts or citations?
Full text is obviously best, but finding an abstract or citation
can be useful. If
you find a citation or abstract of a useful article, be sure to
record the full cita-
tion information so you can search for the full text in another
database.
2. How current are the publications indexed in the database?
How many years into
the past does the database index? The deeper and more recent
35. the coverage the
better.
dro85866_03_c03.indd 49 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Section 3.3 Finding Sources
3. Is access to the contents of the database free or fee-based?
Remember, many fee-
based databases that you find online are free to you when
accessed through
your university or local library.
4. Does the database provide for electronic delivery of sources
and citations? If not,
contact a librarian to learn how to request that an electronic
copy of a source
be sent to you.
Searching Databases
Unlike search engines such as Google, Bing, or Yahoo!, which
use keyword searches by
default, academic databases work best when you specify the
kind of search you want to
conduct. There are three major kinds of database searches you
can conduct: author/title
searches, keyword searches, and subject searches. Which search
you choose depends on
(a) whether you are searching for unknown sources on a topic or
a specific article or book
written by a specific author, (b) what you know about what
you’re trying to find, (c) how
specifically or broadly your topic is defined, and (d) how field-
or discipline-specific your
36. topic or research needs are. Table 3.2 is provided as a reference
to help you determine
what type of search you should conduct. Each search type is
discussed in more detail in
the following sections.
Table 3.2: Database search types
Use Author/Title Search when:
• You know the name of the author you want to find.
• You want to find additional articles by a known writer.
• You know the title of an article or book you want to find.
• You know the title of a journal, periodical, or book series that
frequently contains sources
relevant to your topic.
Use Keyword Search when:
• You have a specific research question to answer.
• Your topic has keywords that are distinctive, new, or field
specific.
• Your topic can only be specified with multiple keywords
(methods AND motivate AND adolescent
AND reluctant readers).
• You have multiple synonyms that you want to search
simultaneously (children OR kids OR teens
OR adolescents).
• More than one field or discipline is relevant to your topic
37. (adolescent psychology AND reading
instruction)
Use Subject Search when:
• Your topic is broad, you are conducting grounding research,
and you don’t yet have specific
research questions to answer.
• You are looking for sources about a person rather than by a
person.
• A keyword in your topic has different meanings in different
fields or disciplines, and you want to
specify which fields or disciplines are relevant.
dro85866_03_c03.indd 50 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Section 3.3 Finding Sources
Performing Author/Title Searches
Author/title searches are used to acquire specific sources when
you already know the
author’s name and title, or when you want to survey the work of
a particular researcher in
hopes of finding other relevant sources he or she has authored.
Once you have one or two
pieces in hand, consult their references pages for the names of
other researchers working
on your topic and titles of their work. Also, since academic
journals tend to specialize,
take note of the titles of journals that show up repeatedly in
your source list and search by
title for those journals to find other relevant articles and
38. researchers active in your field. In
her research, Emma found multiple references to the Journal of
Computer-Mediated Commu-
nication and New Media & Society in her results lists. When she
searched for those journals
by title and browsed their tables of contents, she found the
names of several researchers
working in her field and candidate sources for inclusion in her
project.
Performing Keyword Searches
Although keyword searches can quickly supply you with lots of
candidate sources to
assess, they often return irrelevant results if not carefully
constructed using a search term
development process like the one we went through earlier in
this chapter. So, in order to
generate more relevant results, keyword searches are best used
when you have a specific
research question to answer or you are seeking sources on a
topic that can be described with
distinctive or field-specific keywords. They are particularly
helpful when your research
cuts across traditional disciplinary or field lines. You can use
keyword sources for ground-
ing research, but as noted above, you must monitor your search
results for new keywords
and new variants of keywords as you go. Otherwise, your search
will return only the sub-
set of articles that use everyday language to discuss the topic.
In order for your source set
to help you go beyond the obvious, you will have to conduct
additional keyword searches
using the more precise terms you collect as you browse through
your results list.
39. Keyword searches return the most relevant results when you
combine multiple keywords
with the search term connector AND, which narrows your
search, returning records that
include all of your search terms. If you find that you need to
broaden your search, use the
search term connector OR to return records that include any of
your search terms. While
the specific look of a search interface will vary by provider,
most search interfaces pro-
vide you with the opportunity to enter multiple keywords and to
specify the relationship
between them. You might have to find and click on the
“Advanced Search” link to do so,
but the increase in quality of results makes it well worth the
effort.
Figure 3.3: Using search term connectors
dro85866_03_c03.indd 51 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Section 3.3 Finding Sources
The search shown in Figure 3.3 returns
all the records that include the term read-
ing problems AND either adolescent OR
teen. Notice the asterisk in our search?
It is a truncation symbol, which can
be thought of as a “wild card” charac-
ter that tells the database to return all
results that include the characters up to
the truncation symbol, no matter what
other characters follow the last one.
40. Because we searched for adolescent* or teen*, the database
returns records that include
minor variations of my terms: adolescent and adolescents, teen,
teens, teenagers, teenaged.
Notice too that we might have selected “AND NOT” to omit
results—say, on preschool-
ers—that are not relevant to our topic. Using these strategies
helps ensure that our key-
word search returns a reasonably small set of relevant results.
Performing Subject Searches
Subject searches are useful when your topic is broad and has
many dimensions. You can
use subject searches both to survey the range of subtopics in a
field and to narrow down
your results to find only the results containing the subtopics you
want. Unlike keyword
searches, which return results based solely on the presence or
absence of the word in any
field in the record, subject searches search for your term only in
the subject headings field
of the record. Since subject headings are assigned by the
Library of Congress, you need to
formulate your search very precisely to match the assigned
heading, or your search will
return no results. For example, for our topic on how parents can
motivate their adoles-
cents to read, we could try a subject search for reading and
adolescent (see Figure 3.4).
Figure 3.4: A failed subject search
If a subject search fails, the “Search as Words” option will
allow you to search through results close to
your original search terms.
41. Our search returned no results because the Library of Congress
has not assigned a head-
ing that combines reading and adolescent in sequence. When
you get a result like this, do
not conclude that there are no sources on your topic. There are
many resources available,
but we cannot find them using a subject search without knowing
some of the specific
Although truncation symbols vary by pro-
vider, typical truncation symbols include *, !,
?, #, and $.
dro85866_03_c03.indd 52 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Section 3.3 Finding Sources
preassigned subject headings. It might seem at first glance that
it would be much easier
to use keyword searching. But once you find the Library of
Congress subject headings
specific to your topic, you will locate a treasure trove of
sources, and most of them will be
relevant.
Strategies for Handling Failed Subject Searches
There are two strategies you can use to turn a failed subject
search into one that allows you
to locate the right subject headings. One way is to click the
“Search as Words” option (see
Figure 3.5) to conduct a keyword search of only the subject
headings fields of the records.
42. That will give you a list of books or articles to review. Choose
one that seems to be close
to your topic, open the record, and look at the subject headings
fields (see Figure 3.6 to
locate the subject headings fields on a typical record). Often
you can click on the subject
headings links and be taken directly to a list of sources.
Another way to deal with a failed subject search is to start with
a broader simpler descrip-
tion of the topic: in this case, reading. Doing a subject search
on reading will result in a list
of subject headings similar to the one shown in Figure 3.5.
Figure 3.5: Results of a broad subject search
Broad searches will result in many more subject headings,
which must then be narrowed down to your
specific topic.
The number circled in blue tells us that there are 1,336 subject
headings related to the
word reading in this database. Of course not all of them have
anything to do with the act
of deciphering words on the page. Some have to do with places
named “Reading” in
England, Pennsylvania, Canada, and Australia. You could scroll
through this list of 1,336
subject headings to find ones that are relevant to you. But that
would take a long time, and
you still would not be guaranteed of finding relevant subject
headings that do not begin
with the word reading. A faster and more reliable approach
would be to click on the “Read-
ing” subject heading and quickly browse some of the titles of
the 892 sources on reading
43. to find one that looks like it might be relevant. For this search,
the very first page of results
includes a book titled 99 Ways to Get Kids to Love Reading and
One Hundred Books They’ll
Love. When you pull up its record, you find two relevant
subject headings you can select,
including one, Reading—Parent participation, that seems spot
on.
dro85866_03_c03.indd 53 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Section 3.3 Finding Sources
Figure 3.6: Subject headings on a typical record
It is important to keep in mind the different configurations that
a title might be listed under in terms
of subjects.
Clicking through both of the more specific subject headings
leads you indirectly to hun-
dreds of sources, many of which will lead you to other relevant
subject headings. When
you click through Reading—Parent Participation, you are
directed to a list of related subject
headings that provide you with access to relevant sources, as
shown in Figure 3.7.
Figure 3.7: Search results: Reading—Parent Participation
Databases are organized to help maximize searches. In this
instance, the specificity of subject headings
for the search term “Reading—Parent Participation” will allow
the researcher to quickly exclude irrelevant
44. groupings and instead focus on those pertinent to his or her
topic.
Notice how the subject headings list allows you to specify the
kinds of sources you want
to find (bibliographies, handbooks, case studies), geographic
locations, reading genres,
and more. You will want to select several of these related
subject headings to produce a list
of results to review. Clicking through the Children—Reading
subject heading will produce
another set of sources with additional subject headings to
search. Since subject headings
are uniform across databases, useful subject headings you
discover in one database are
likely to be useful in other databases. So be sure to record
which of the subject headings
you find are the most useful. And as always, be on the lookout
for new search terms, new
dro85866_03_c03.indd 54 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Chapter Summary
variants, and the jargon that expert researchers use to describe
their topics and use those
terms in future searches.
Search Narrowing and Search Broadening
One last note on searching: Use search-narrowing strategies
when your searches return
too many results to review or the results are not as relevant as
you’d like them to be. Use
search-broadening strategies when your search returns too few
45. results or they are too spe-
cialized for your purposes. These strategies are encapsulated in
Table 3.3.
Table 3.3: Search-narrowing and search-broadening strategies
Narrowing Strategies Broadening Strategies
• Using multiple search terms connected by
“AND” or “AND NOT.”
• Using more specific or specialized terms.
• Using available limiters to set scope.
• Searching for multiple terms connected by
“OR.”
• Using more common, less specific, or
broader terms.
• Using truncation to search for word variants.
We have already seen search-narrowing strategies at work
earlier in this chapter when
we looked for synonyms for our search term “child.” We saw
that more specific and spe-
cialized terms such as adolescent, teen, or juvenile return fewer
but more relevant results.
We also saw that combining multiple terms in a search (such as
“parent” AND “reluctant
reader” AND “techniques”) significantly reduced the number of
irrelevant sources we
needed to sift through.
When searches return too few results, you need to expand your
searches. Rewrite your
46. search using fewer search terms, or by using “OR” as a
connector instead of “AND,” as in a
search for “juvenile” OR “teen” OR “adolescent” AND
“readers”). You can also try replacing
technical or overly specific terms with more common or more
general terms: “reading com-
prehension” might replace “semantic decoding,” for example.
Finally, try using truncation
symbols to search for variations of a term: “read*” to search for
“reading” and “readers.”
Chapter Summary
As you review this chapter, pay particular attention to the
concepts, strategies, and tools
that enable you to see your sources as something more than
containers of information.
Being able to determine whether your source is “scholarly” or
“popular” is a key deter-
minant of the uses to which it may or may not be put. The
BEAM mnemonic can help you
see your sources as a writer does—as resources: to help you
establish the background of
your topic; to provide you with exhibits to analyze and
interpret; to enable you to bor-
row, extend, or counter the arguments of other researchers; and
to certify the rigor of your
research by using reliable methods.
It is vital to remember that success in searching for sources
depends on what questions you
ask and how well you ask them. If you are conducting research
in a new field, be sure to use
the strategies detailed in this chapter to learn the kinds of
questions researchers working in
dro85866_03_c03.indd 55 10/2/13 2:31 PM
47. CHAPTER 3Key Terms
the field ask and the specialized language they use. Once you
have researchable questions,
remember to analyze your questions to determine their
keywords and the relationships
among them. Do not forget to search for variants or synonyms
of key concepts. Use your
research log to keep track of successful searches so that you can
use them in other databases.
You should also experiment with Google Scholar and the
databases available to you
through your university or local library to become more familiar
with database searching.
As you learned in Chapter 2, be sure to analyze your results list
to discover the names of
researchers working in your area, new terms or concepts, and
subject headings that are
relevant to your topic.
Key Terms
argument source A source that provides
researchers with claims to affirm, dispute,
refine, or extend.
background source A source that pro-
vides researchers with established facts
and accepted ideas, which they use to
establish a significant context for their own
research.
BEAM Joseph Bizup’s memory aid to
48. help researchers understand four common
sense ways to use sources in research: as
background, exhibit, argument, or method.
exhibit A source that provides research-
ers with examples or cases to analyze and
interpret in support or refutation of a claim.
method A source that provides research-
ers with a reliable process for gathering,
analyzing, and interpreting exhibits.
multidisciplinary database Also known
as a “general purpose database”; a data-
base that indexes many different fields or
disciplines.
natural language Language used by
human beings in the ordinary course of
events, in contrast to computer, database,
or machine languages and the systematic
language of formal logic.
news source A source written by journal-
ists reporting on current issues or events.
popular source A source written primarily
for entertainment or to earn money.
scholarly source A peer reviewed source
produced by credentialed experts seek-
ing the truth and writing in their field of
expertise.
search construction The analytical process
by which researchers transform their ques-
49. tions into queries of a library database to
find sources.
subject guide A research aid produced
by librarians to provide researchers who
are new to a field with guidance in locat-
ing appropriate databases, journals, and
sources.
subject heading Fields in a library data-
base record that specify the topics and
subtopics addressed in a text.
subject-specific database Also known as
a “field-specific database”; a database that
aims to represent the full range of a par-
ticular field or subject.
trade source A source written by a repre-
sentative of a profession or industry for the
purpose of informing or advising.
truncation symbol A “wild card” charac-
ter that tells a search database to return all
results that include the characters up to the
truncation symbol, no matter what other
characters follow the last one.
dro85866_03_c03.indd 56 10/2/13 2:31 PM
CHAPTER 3Web Sites For Further Reference
Web Sites For Further Reference
http://prezi.com/svjv-nfgka95/intro-to-library-databases/
50. This “Intro to Library Databases” Prezi by Nancy Bellafante
explains the difference
between the content available via Google and library databases,
as well as how to ana-
lyze a research question and search a database.
http://www.schooltube.com/video/f42863cbb7cb4db6a3f4/Talki
ng%20to%20Databases
This short video on “Talking to a Database” produced at Kent
State University shows
how to turn a research topic into a format that library databases
will understand.
dro85866_03_c03.indd 57 10/2/13 2:31 PM
http://prezi.com/svjv-nfgka95/intro-to-library-databases/
http://www.schooltube.com/video/f42863cbb7cb4db6a3f4/Talki
ng%20to%20Databases
dro85866_03_c03.indd 58 10/2/13 2:31 PM
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds
discoveries is not “Eureka!” (“I found it!”), but rather “hmm . .
.
that’s funny.”
—Isaac Asimov
Learning Objectives
After reading this chapter, you
should be able to:
51. 1. Outline the characteristics of aca-
demic research and describe some of
its main qualities.
2. Describe the three key qualities of
trustworthy research.
3. Understand and explain the concept
of research as a “conversation.”
4. Explain the truth about common
research myths.
1Introduction to Academic Research
Exactostock/SuperStock
dro85866_01_c01.indd 1 10/2/13 3:41 PM
CHAPTER 1Section 1.1 What Is Research?
This chapter introduces you to the research process you will
conduct throughout your
college degree program. We begin by suggesting that you
already know quite a bit about
research from the research you do in your personal life. We also
describe the nature and
purpose of academic research and debunk some commonly held
myths about the chal-
lenges of academic research.
1.1 What Is Research?
52. Before we get started, you should understand that the academic
environment is not the only environment that values research.
Research skills are also highly valued in policy settings, as well
as in the professions and trades. According to Dr. David
Jonassen (2000), director of the University of Missouri Center
for the Study of Problem
Solving, “Virtually everyone, in their everyday and professional
lives, regularly solves
problems. Few, if any, people, are rewarded in their
professional lives for memorizing
information and completing examinations” (p. 63). Research is
primarily a problem-
solving activity. When you conduct research, you must define
and clarify problems, ask
answerable questions, locate and evaluate resources, and use
sources to make persuasive
arguments and actionable recommendations. By learning to
conduct research, you will
get more out of your education, enhance your career, and
contribute to the success of the
civic and business organizations to which you belong.
You Already Do Research
At the most basic level, research satisfies our need to answer
questions, solve problems,
make choices, or figure out what things mean. Sometimes our
questions are simple or of
personal consequence. In those cases, our answers
depend simply on gathering information or
weighing opinions and evaluating what we find
in terms of our taste or preference. For example,
when we browse the Internet to find restaurants
for a special dinner next weekend, we are in fact
conducting simple informal research. When we
read everything we can find about different types
of automobiles to help us make a decision about
53. what type of car to purchase, we are seeking reli-
able expert testimony to help us make sense of the
vast amount of information available to us.
Critical Thinking in Everyday Research
Even though the research is simple in these cases,
we are still using some critical thinking skills.
In fact, we are using some of the same ones that
inform academic research. Professional research-
ers always approach their sources of information
skeptically. They know that their conclusions
depend on having high-quality, reliable infor-
mation to think carefully about. So they need
to ensure that they are not misled by irrelevant,
Exactostock/SuperStock
As a researcher, your most basic task will
be to identify problems of interest and ask
the right questions.
dro85866_01_c01.indd 2 10/2/13 3:41 PM
CHAPTER 1Section 1.1 What Is Research?
Criteria for Evaluating Sources
• Relevant
• Credible
• Timely
• Representative
• Appropriate motivation and controlled for bias
inaccurate, or out-of-date information, or by the arguments of
sloppy or unscrupulous
54. thinkers. The same goes for everyday researchers. In order to
avoid a bad meal or being
dissatisfied with our new car, we need to evaluate whether our
sources are relevant, cred-
ible, and timely; understand their motivation and bias; and make
judgments about how
representative a particular review is in light of what other
reviewers write. In Chapter
4, Evaluating and Working with Sources, you will learn more
about these criteria. But
for now, you can draw on your experience with everyday
research to understand that a
review of a Chinese restaurant is irrelevant or of no use if you
want to eat Thai food.
A review written by the cousin of the owner of the restaurant is
not credible, or believable,
because you cannot be sure that the reviewer is writing to tell
the truth. Perhaps he or she
means to drive more customers to the restaurant with an
excellent review, and therefore
overlooks significant problems in service or quality. He or she
is motivated by his or her
relationship with the owner, and therefore his or her evaluation
is biased in favor of the
restaurant. This review would not then be trustworthy. A review
of the restaurant writ-
ten 5 years ago may no longer accurately reflect the dining
experience; in order to get a
more accurate picture, you will need a more recent, or timely,
review. Finally, you may
have had the experience of reading one or two negative reviews
of a place among a hun-
dred positive reviews. Those negative reviews do not represent
or stand for the general
opinion of the place. To say that a review is not representative
55. is not to say that it is untrue
necessarily—merely that it is does not fall in line with the
consensus. With a nonrepresen-
tative source, it is good practice to ask why it dissents from the
consensus. A source may
be nonrepresentative because its writer has idiosyncratic or
personal preferences, uses a
different method of arriving at conclusions, looks at things from
a different viewpoint, or
perhaps has made some mistake. You will use these same
criteria to evaluate sources in
the research you will conduct.
The Differences Between Academic or Professional Research
and
Everyday Research
This text is meant to prepare you to use research to answer more
complicated questions:
the kind that you will encounter in academic and workplace
environments. In those set-
tings, questions can be very complex, and expert testimony may
not provide clear guid-
ance. Answers may be partial, not definitive, or dependent on
multiple variables or on the
values of the researcher. Moreover, the stakes can be
considerably higher than choosing a
restaurant or car.
dro85866_01_c01.indd 3 10/2/13 3:41 PM
CHAPTER 1Section 1.2 The Cumulative, Ongoing, and
Critical Nature of Research
Consider these questions:
56. • In the last 2 decades, honeybee populations have been
decimated by Honeybee
Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD). Since Honeybees pollinate
our food crops,
the collapse of millions of colonies is a threat to the world food
supply. What
is causing this disorder? What can be done to prevent CCD and
restore the
Honeybee population?
• The United States continues to experience high levels of
unemployment
despite an uptick in the economy. Why has job growth not kept
pace with the
increasing gross domestic product (a standard measure of the
productivity of
our national economy)? What factors influence unemployment?
What can the
government do to help businesses create good, well-paying
jobs?
• Your company wants to develop a new product or line of
business. How will
consumers respond to your product, service, or marketing? What
variables
will influence their purchasing decisions for the foreseeable
future? How can
you mitigate risk?
It is not just complexity that distinguishes these questions from
the research questions we
tend to ask and answer in our daily life. It is that they are
emerging, not-yet-fully-under-
stood problems. There are no simple, clear-cut, definitive
answers out there waiting to be
57. found. Reasonable people in full possession of available data
might reasonably disagree
as to what the data mean, or what the appropriate course of
action should be.
Yet these are pressing matters. We simply cannot wait for all
the information to become
available, and for unclear matters to resolve themselves before
taking action. That is
where research—our most effective means of solving complex
problems—comes in. In
such cases, researchers use a systematic approach that enables
them to begin to ask and
answer these emerging questions. As a result, the work of
research is not always to pro-
vide clear and definitive solutions to problems. Research can
also clarify issues, bring
forward new variables or alternative perspectives for
consideration, reduce uncertainty,
or reveal tacit values.
1.2 The Cumulative, Ongoing, and Critical
Nature of Research
Because of the nature of the problems researchers need to solve,
research tends to be cumulative and ongoing, which is to say
that researchers consider the results of the past and expect that
future research may extend, revise, or refute their own work.
That is why researchers tend to start their work by reviewing
what is already known or
believed to be true. They read journal articles, conference
proceedings, and other forms
of scholarly publication to ground themselves in the ideas and
perspectives of other
researchers. As they read these sources, they want to know:
58. • What questions other researchers have pursued,
• How other researchers have framed their questions,
• What data exist,
dro85866_01_c01.indd 4 10/2/13 3:41 PM
CHAPTER 1Section 1.2 The Cumulative, Ongoing, and
Critical Nature of Research
• What concepts and ideas previous researchers have used or
created to make
sense of their data,
• What related problems, issues, or phenomenon need to be
taken into account,
• What false starts others have encountered, and
• What remains to be understood about the problem.
The work of review is more than a simple gathering of useful
information, however.
Researchers look critically at earlier work to evaluate its
strengths and weaknesses, as well
as its utility for their own work. As they read the works of other
researchers, they
• Check for errors,
• Look for ideas to refute, borrow, or build on,
• Browse for suggestive data, cases, or examples,
• Seek out unexplored questions or unrecognized implications,
• Uncover problematic assumptions or bias, and
• Consider alternative explanations or perspectives.
As you start to review sources for use in your own research, you
will need to approach
59. them just as critically. To do so, it is important to have an idea
of what makes sources
trustworthy.
Trustworthy Research Is Selective
Every research study is selective, in the sense that researchers
must focus their study on
a limited number of questions. As a result, researchers tend to
specialize and coordinate
their work. For example, because the problem of Honeybee
Colony Collapse Disorder is
so complex, there are several overlapping communities of
researchers trying to solve it.
Some teams of researchers are trying to isolate an
environmental cause of CCD. Others
are looking at causes in biological pathogens. Still others are
trying to improve methods
for gathering and analyzing relevant data. Yet even others are
looking to the past to find
analogous events that might help us see the problem in a more
familiar light. Each of these
teams comprises experts with different skills and knowledge,
bringing different methods
of generating and interpreting data to the work of solving the
problem of CCD. Without
specialization and focused studies of constituent elements of the
problem, key aspects of
the problem would go unstudied.
Trustworthy Research Tends to Be Peer Reviewed
With specialization, however, comes the prospect of conflicting
results. For example, one
study may show that eating beef has health benefits for humans,
while another study
shows that eating beef is detrimental to our health in some way.
For consumers look-
60. ing for guidance, this apparent contradiction can be frustrating
because they presume
that one study must be right and the other wrong. Someone must
have gotten the facts
wrong. However, researchers know that each research study
develops different research
questions, studies different populations of people or different
types of beef, or conducts
research in a different manner. So results may vary even when a
study’s facts and fact
handling are correct. In the future, results and the conclusions
drawn from them may vary
dro85866_01_c01.indd 5 10/2/13 3:41 PM
CHAPTER 1Section 1.3 Research as Conversation
as more data are gathered, alternative perspectives or
explanations are considered, and
new ways of framing questions are developed. That is why
researchers’ work is subject to
review by other experts in their field. Peer review certifies that
the research has been car-
ried out carefully and systematically and that interpretations
and conclusions are reason-
ably drawn. This constant, critical peer review process is one
reason research is so reliable,
and such a powerful tool for constructing knowledge.
Research Must Be Synthesized to Be Useful
Over time, as fields of study mature, researchers start the
important work of synthesizing
the current state of knowledge. In synthesis, researchers
assemble the diverse work on
61. different aspects of the problem and try to create a bigger, more
useful picture of what the
research community knows. But syn-
thesis is more than simple summary.
It is the critical interpretative act of
making meaning out of information.
This makes research useful. As we
have seen in the CCD case, it often
takes multiple strands of research
to help us solve complex problems.
In synthesis, researchers attempt to
weave these strands together into a
more comprehensive explanation for
the purpose of resolving conflicts or
contradictions, and exploring the
implication of what has been learned.
Much of the work you will do in
research projects will be to synthesize
the current state of knowledge in your
field and explore its implications for
an argument you wish to make.
1.3 Research as Conversation
This text focuses on a research process that begins with a
systematic review of the lit-erature produced by other
researchers. In a literature review, your role is primarily to
synthesize, assess, and interpret the existing research in order to
increase clarity,
reduce uncertainty, locate areas for further research or
discussion, and possibly to make
actionable recommendations. Ordinarily we think of “literature”
as referring to the works
of creative writers: poems, plays, stories, and novels. In
research settings, “the literature”
means the set of articles, books, reports, conference
62. presentations, and other publications
that contain the current state of knowledge. “Reviewing the
literature” means finding and
reading those publications to see what is known, what questions
and issues are currently
being discussed, and where you can make a contribution to the
discussion.
Jason Hawkes/The Image Bank/Getty Images
Synthesis is the process of taking multiple strands of
research and creating a bigger, more useful picture of
what the research community knows about an issue.
dro85866_01_c01.indd 6 10/2/13 3:41 PM
CHAPTER 1Section 1.3 Research as Conversation
Before we get started understanding the research
process you will use in this text, it is important
to make a subtle shift in the way you think about
research. Most of us tend to think about research
primarily in terms of information and what we do
with it: We gather information, evaluate it, ana-
lyze it, summarize it. However, such a view of
research tends to make student researchers pas-
sive conduits of information produced by others.
Furthermore, it encourages them to see the pre-
sentation of information itself as their chief work
in writing. In professional settings, research-
ers make progress by constantly exchanging
and testing ideas and building on one another’s
work. In order for their work to be useful to oth-
ers, researchers must do more than just deliver
information. One point of research is to contrib-
63. ute to the collective work of problem solving.
Researchers must demonstrate the relevance and
utility of their ideas by showing how it relates to
previous work, whether by adding nuance, alter-
ing conclusions, or provoking reconsideration of
issues once thought settled. Throughout this text,
you will be expected to take a more active role in
research, one that approximates what researchers
do. You will be asked to go beyond collecting and reporting
facts, to formulate your own
researched response to what researchers have written.
Research as an Evidence-Based Conversation Among People
In order to take a more active approach to research, it can be
helpful to think of your pur-
pose in research as joining the conversation of an established
community of thinkers. Here
is how philosopher, critic, and researcher Kenneth Burke (1973)
describes what it is like to
join the conversation of other thinkers:
Imagine that you enter a parlor. You come late. When you
arrive, others
have long preceded you, and they are engaged in a heated
discussion, a dis-
cussion too heated for them to pause and tell you exactly what it
is about.
In fact, the discussion had already begun long before any of
them got there,
so that no one present is qualified to retrace for you all the
steps that had
gone before. You listen for a while, until you decide that you
have caught
the tenor of the argument; then you put in your oar. Someone
answers;
64. you answer him; another comes to your defense; another aligns
himself
against you, to either the embarrassment or gratification of your
opponent,
depending upon the quality of your ally’s assistance. However,
the discus-
sion is interminable. The hour grows late, you must depart. And
you do
depart, with the discussion still vigorously in progress. (pp.
110–111)
Stephen Simpson/Stone/Getty Images
The goal of research is not to make a
definitive final statement on a subject
but to engage in discussion with existing
research in order to pose new questions
and further impel the dialogue.
dro85866_01_c01.indd 7 10/2/13 3:41 PM
CHAPTER 1Section 1.4 If the Idea of Research Sounds Scary
to You, Read on
Part of what is so compelling about this passage is the way that
it captures the persistent
exchange of ideas and positions that is characteristic of
research. It also suggests that in
order to join the conversation, it is your responsibility to figure
out for yourself what others
are saying, why they are saying it, and what importance it has
for you.
Research Articles Make Contributions to a Conversation
One implication of seeing research as a conversation that
65. preexists you, and that will
continue on after you, is that you must approach a piece of
researched writing with an
eye toward understanding what work that piece of writing is
doing in the conversation.
Instead of an article standing on its own and simply reporting
information, you must
make an effort to see how an article fulfills a researcher’s intent
to make some specific con-
tribution to the conversation: to support another’s view, to
resolve an open question, to
add a new dimension to the problem, to correct an error or
misinterpretation, or to argue
that the conversation itself is based on faulty assumptions.
Another implication of this conversational view of research is
that it relieves you of the
pressure and responsibility of having the final word, or to base
your response on origi-
nal findings of your own. Your goal is simply to use other
researchers’ data and ideas to
make a useful contribution to the conversation, to “push it
forward, to say something new,
something that seems to call for further talk and writing,” as
Duke University writing
professor Joseph Harris puts it (2006, pp. 35–36). You bring
your critical thinking skills,
the interpretive act of synthesis, your ability to see
implications, and your own considered
perspective to the conversation of research.
This idea that the purpose of research and the writing based on
research is to join in and
contribute to a preexisting conversation will shape your
research process. Instead of look-
ing for pieces of information that support your view, you will
66. be looking for communities
of researchers actively engaged in conversation with one
another. In Burke’s language,
you will conduct research to “listen” in on their conversation,
and then “put your oar
in” to respond to some researchers in order to contribute to
some specific branch of the
conversation.
1.4 If the Idea of Research Sounds Scary to You, Read on
Many people approach academic research apprehensively or
fearfully, thinking that it is complex, difficult, and fraught with
danger. If you are one of these people, remember that you do
not bear the burden of producing a “Eureka!” dis-
covery in your research. Your job is to notice something
unusual or interesting about your
topic and contribute to the conversation others are having using
reason, evidence drawn
from other researchers’ work, and your own careful judicious
thinking.
Even though we might not be aware of them, many of us hold
anxiety-producing beliefs
about research. Many of those beliefs are not founded on fact or
experience. And what
is worse, many of them work to our disadvantage when we
actually try to do academic
research. In this section of the chapter, we will debunk some of
the more common myths
about research, and encourage you to see yourself as well
prepared to start and complete
your project.
dro85866_01_c01.indd 8 10/2/13 3:41 PM
67. CHAPTER 1Section 1.4 If the Idea of Research Sounds Scary
to You, Read on
Myth 1: Research is too time consuming to be done in a first-
year
writing course.
It is true that some research projects take a long time to develop
and complete. But we
can design many worthwhile research projects to be completed
in a short time. The key to
designing a short research project is to define the focus of your
research narrowly enough
to allow it to be completed in the time allotted, while at the
same time doing justice to the
topic. Chapters 2 and 3 will help you go through a process of
project definition that will
enable you to locate a small area of interest to you, and learn
enough about it to ask a small
set of answerable questions.
Myth 2: I have to have extensive knowledge of a subject to do
research.
Actually all you need is the desire to know more about a
subject. Using the exploratory
research techniques provided in Chapter 2, you will quickly
learn enough to know what
questions need answers. After that, it only takes curiosity,
persistence, and a few relatively
simple search and reading strategies to pursue the answer.
Myth 3: The experts who conduct research and write research
articles
are beyond criticism, so what can a newcomer to the field
possibly
68. think or write about their findings?
Because most of us think that research is done by experts with
advanced degrees and
using sophisticated techniques, most of us are reluctant to
consider that published pro-
fessional research might by unreli-
able, or even simply wrong. But since
professional researchers are work-
ing to solve complex problems—like
Honeybee Colony Collapse Disor-
der—even experts make mistakes,
draw conclusions that their evidence
does not support, or produce find-
ings that conflict with other studies.
Researchers working at all levels—
from professional to student—expect
their work to be subject to scrutiny.
For many topics, student researchers
have more than enough knowledge,
experience, and perspective to pose
questions, extend thoughts, and oth-
erwise respond to the works of pro-
fessional researchers.
iStockphoto/Thinkstock
While research may seem daunting, as a student
researcher, you have plenty of knowledge and experience
that will enable you to pose questions and enter the
conversation surrounding many topics.
dro85866_01_c01.indd 9 10/2/13 3:41 PM
CHAPTER 1Section 1.4 If the Idea of Research Sounds Scary
to You, Read on
69. Myth 4: Research always produces big insights and new
knowledge.
The vast majority of research being done is small scale. Most
researchers aim to add small
insights or nuances to existing knowledge. One form of really
useful research—synthesis—
looks at other researchers’ findings and combines them in
innovative ways to produce new
insights. Other forms of research aim to improve clarity, reduce
uncertainty, or justify posi-
tions or beliefs. Still others seek to find other uses for ideas or
processes, or to reevaluate an
issue from a new perspective. For college purposes, research
can be what writing specialist
Ken Macrorie (1988) calls “I-search,” a search for ideas,
insights, and information that enables
you to create knowledge and perspectives that are new to you.
Myth 5: Research is super-systematic and analytical; logical,
linear
thinkers are better at it than intuitive or “messy” thinkers.
It is true that once researchers have a clear idea of the questions
they are asking and the
data they need, they tend to work systematically, analytically,
and in a disciplined manner.
However, in order to arrive at those questions, and in order to
understand the implica-
tions of their findings, researchers must think creatively and be
open to new perspec-
tives. Researchers depend as much on associative thinking,
serendipity, and other forms
of messy-but-productive creative thinking as they do on
rigorous systematic thinking.
Myth 6: Research has to be totally fact based and objective;
70. there is
no room in my project for my ideas or values.
While researchers do tend to privilege reason over emotion, and
try to ensure that their
strictly personal beliefs do not unduly influence their work,
most of the potential research
topics you will encounter will be researchable from a wide
range of perspectives. You
will need to be open minded in your research to prevent
yourself from introducing bias,
but your ideas and values will influence your choice of topic,
the set of questions you
pursue, your selection of evidence, and your response to the
ideas and findings of other
researchers.
If you can put these myths aside and embrace the truth about
academic research, you
can be more confident in your ability to start and complete a
research project. Remember
Joseph Harris’s advice:
The goal of [academic] writing is not to have the final word on
a subject,
to bring the discussion to a close, but to push it forward, to say
something
new, something that seems to call for further talk and writing. .
. . A dia-
logue is not a debate. You don’t win a conversation, you add to
it, push it
ahead, keep it going, “put your oar in,” and maybe even
sometimes redi-
rect or divert the flow of talk. (2006, pp. 35–36)
When you think of conducting research to join a preexisting
conversation, you realize
71. that you are not alone. Other researchers have gone before you
and have shared the paths
they followed. They have dropped “breadcrumbs” along the
way, in the form of sources
and ideas for you to follow. As you pick up these breadcrumbs
and examine them, you
dro85866_01_c01.indd 10 10/2/13 3:41 PM
CHAPTER 1Section 1.4 If the Idea of Research Sounds Scary
to You, Read on
will encounter many surprises and learn something fascinating
about yourself and about
your world.
At times, making your way through a thick forest of ideas
without getting lost, or side-
tracked, can be challenging. It can also be frustrating when you
struggle to find the right
direction or learn you are on a dead-end trail. However, you
have your instructor and
many other resources—including this text—to help you find
your way and show you how
to forge ahead again. Figure 1.1 represents the approach to
research that this text takes,
including the steps of the research process.
Figure 1.1: The process of writing a researched essay
Those writing a researched essay can consider themselves in
dialogue with the current body of research
on the topic. Allow sufficient time in your writing process to
move through each of these phases, from
72. planning to drafting to refining your paper.
You will encounter pitfalls along the way. Nonetheless, as you
work your way through
the thick brush, you will eventually come to a clearing, where
ideas begin to take form
and conclusions begin to suggest
themselves.
The treasure at the end of this journey
is a new perspective or an answer to
the question you asked when you
started your quest, the satisfaction of
adding to your own knowledge and
the knowledge of others about this
subject, and the reward of develop-
ing a valuable set of research skills
that will serve you well in future
areas of your personal and profes-
sional life. But the most important
outcome of this process is that you
will have learned what it takes to add
your voice to the research work of
others in the community of scholars.
Phase I—Design:
Project Definition,
Grounding Research,
& Topic Development
Phase V—Finish:
Polish, Present, Publish
Phase II—Review the Literature:
Construct a Model of the Existing
73. Conversation. Discover Your
Stance
Phase IV—Reconsider:
Review, Revisit, Rethink,
Rewrite
Phase III—Draft:
Join the Conversation
iStockphoto/Thinkstock
A thesis must be situated among the arguments of other
researchers. Good arguments gain their strength by
responding to and acknowledging existing ideas.
dro85866_01_c01.indd 11 10/2/13 3:41 PM
CHAPTER 1Key Terms
Chapter Summary
In this chapter, you learned that academic or professional
research is simply a more
systematic and rigorous version of the research process you use
to answer questions in
everyday life. Because academic research is a cumulative,
ongoing conversation among
skeptical participants, it can answer complex questions. Because
it is selective and peer
reviewed, it tends to be highly reliable.
You have also learned that some of the beliefs about research
that some students hold
can hinder their ability to complete their research projects well.
It is important to believe
74. that you can complete your project in the time allotted with the
resources available to
you. Remember, most research deals with the particulars of a
small set of questions. You
should also believe that newcomers to a field (or even to
research itself) can contribute
valuable insights. While the ability to think analytically and
systematically can be use-
ful to researchers, so too is the ability to think creatively and
intuitively. Finally, every
researcher’s work is informed by his or her values. While it is
important to seek the truth
in research, many questions (especially in the humanities and
social sciences) demand that
researchers make value judgments. The key to integrating your
values into your research
is to be sure to remain open to new data, ideas, and
perspectives.
Key Terms
bias Assumptions, attitudes or disposi-
tions that cause a researcher to be closed to
new evidence, ideas, or perspectives.
credible Sources that are written by certi-
fied experts writing in their field of exper-
tise; they offer reasons and evidence to
support claims, consider all available and
relevant information, and fairly and accu-
rately represent the views of other writers.
literature review A critical summary and
evaluation of sources relevant to the ques-
tions a researcher is seeking to answer.
motivation The needs or purposes that
75. inspire a researcher to conduct research
and write about it.
peer review The process by which new
research is certified as reliable, rigorous,
and worthy of consideration. During peer
review, experts anonymously evaluate
pieces of research for errors of fact, logic,
judgment, or omission. They also evaluate
the significance and value of the research.
relevant Sources that provide resources to
answer your research questions and share
concepts, vocabulary, cases, and methods
with other researchers in the field.
representative Sources that illustrate a
view or position in a field of study, or a
significant earlier view that is still relevant.
selective Research that seeks to answer
a limited set of questions on the basis of
available evidence.
synthesis The evaluative and interpretive
process of combining diverse strands of
research conducted by different research-
ers into a coherent argument.
timely Sources that take into account a
field’s most recent information, ideas, and
theories.
dro85866_01_c01.indd 12 10/2/13 3:41 PM
76. CHAPTER 1Web Sites for Further Reference
Web Sites for Further Reference
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bByHhUa5_A
Jamie McKenzie discusses how to approach research when, like
most researchers, you
begin your project “not knowing what you don’t know.” The
key is to take a cyclical
approach to research in which you “muck about” with ideas for
a while, then sort and
sift through them to develop essential questions of your own.
http://fno.org/dec99/rcycle.html
An article by McKenzie detailing the research cycle.
dro85866_01_c01.indd 13 10/2/13 3:41 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bByHhUa5_A
http://fno.org/dec99/rcycle.html
dro85866_01_c01.indd 14 10/2/13 3:41 PM
“You can’t keep it all in your head.”
—Louis Fried
Student writers often approach the start of a research project
with mixed emotions. Excited
by the prospect of discovery, they can also be daunted by what
seems a complicated set of
tasks to complete. Interested in learning more about a real world
77. topic, they worry about
not finding enough of the right kinds of sources. Ready to
develop deeper understanding
by thinking along with the experts, students fear not knowing
how to comment on or use
the work of experts in ways that their teachers expect. This
book aims to kindle your inter-
est by helping you tame the complexities of a research project.
In this appendix, you will
learn how to deploy proven project management skills to help
you efficiently navigate
your way through the process.
Even student researchers who understand the nature of research
sometimes fear that they
will be unable to successfully project manage their research.
Like them, you may find
yourself wondering how you will find and keep track of
multiple sources of informa-
tion. You may be concerned about how you will avoid
procrastination, overcome some
of the admittedly tedious tasks entailed in research, and ensure
steady progress toward
completion.
There is no getting around it: Writing a research paper is a
sizable project. In some colleges
and universities, you may have a 15- to 18-week semester to
complete such a project. In
accelerated programs, your research assignments are structured
to be achievable in only
a few weeks. In courses having a research assignment, you will
usually be assigned the
paper early in the course, and you may be required to prepare
and submit intermediate
sections of the assignment each week, with the final paper due
78. at the end of the course.
These intermediate assignments can help you stay on track with
your research assignment
because they will be drafts of the final paper you are writing in
advance, which you then
revise and edit before the final paper is due. In these cases,
some of the project manage-
ment work has been done for you. But you will still need to
manage your progress from
week to week and throughout the course.
Appendix A: How to Project Manage
Your Research Project
dro85866_09_appA.indd 169 10/2/13 2:50 PM
APPENDIX A
Key Project Management Strategies
The key to productivity in research, as in life, and at work, is
project management. In order to be successful, you have to
1. Approach the project with the right mindset in the right
environment;
2. Formulate a reasonable plan to complete your project by
breaking it up into
smaller sequences of tasks;
3. Set clear, concrete, achievable goals for each working session
and work until
you achieve them;
4. Monitor your progress to assess your execution of your plan
and make
79. changes as necessary; and
5. Keep a research notebook.
We will look at each of these strategies in more detail, so that
you can better understand
how to implement them in your research project.
Approach the Project With the Right Mindset in
the Right Environment
If you believe any of the myths about research we discussed in
Chapter 1, try to work
actively to minimize their impact on your project. Keep
reminding yourself that academic
research is just an extension of research behaviors that you do
in your daily life. Write
project milestones on a calendar to demonstrate to yourself that
you can complete the
project in the time allotted. Trust that your existing knowledge,
experience, and curiosity
can initiate a fabulous research project. Aspire to enhance your
own understanding and
develop small insights into your topic rather than trying to solve
a big problem. Embrace
both your creative mind and your analytical one. Try to find an
area of interest in the topic
that resonates with your values and experience—one that you
will want to share with
friends and family, as well as classmates.
Because research projects require you to carry out somewhat
unfamiliar and fairly com-
plex tasks, it is critical that you do not try to multitask when
you are working on your proj-
ect. If you are like most people, you need to get a lot of things
done in a short span of time.
80. Multitasking seems like a necessity. But recent scientific
research reveals that multitask-
ing comes with high efficiency costs (Kuchinskas, 2007).
Moreover, it is only productive
when you are switching between two or more fairly routine
tasks that occupy different
channels of your brain (Anderson, 2009). So, it is true that you
can fold laundry (a manual
task) while watching American Idol (a visual task) and be pretty
productive. Likewise,
you can mow the lawn and listen to a baseball game at the same
time and pay fair atten-
tion to both. However, when the tasks are even moderately
complicated, rapid switching
between them drastically reduces your efficiency up to 40% and
compromises the results
(Anderson, 2009). Consequently, while it is possible to cook
dinner while helping your
fourth-grader with homework, your multitasking significantly
increases the chance that
you botch both dinner and homework.
dro85866_09_appA.indd 170 10/2/13 2:50 PM
APPENDIX A
Working on your research project will require your full
attention. You will need to cre-
ate a single-tasking environment in which to work—one that
minimizes distractions and
enables you to enter into that hyper-focused state of mind
necessary to work efficiently and
think productively. Here are some concrete tips for creating a
single-tasking environment.
81. • Put a door between you and everyone with whom you live, and
make it very
clear that you are unavailable. Workplace research shows that,
on average,
it takes workers 25 minutes to return to tasks once they have
been disturbed
(Anderson, 2009).
• Limit your channels of communication to the outer world. Sam
Anderson
(2009) reports that Americans who work on computers “keep an
average of
eight windows open on our computer screens at one time and
skip between
them every twenty seconds” (para. 14). Effective research
requires more sus-
tained attention than that. So shut down Facebook, close your
web browser
(except for research purposes), log out of chat, set your email
program not to
notify you when new mail arrives, silence your phone, and turn
off the radio
or TV. If you have to listen to music, make sure it is music
without words
(you do not want the language center of your brain to multitask
in the back-
ground when you are working on new or complex material made
entirely out
of words). Better yet, try playing a white noise loop through ear
buds to shut
out distracting sounds.
• Plan working sessions of about 2 consecutive hours at a time
and try to
change your activity within sessions (for example, from reading