The 1st paragraph will define the Who , What , When and Where of the assigned subject in no less than two or more than four sentences. I want sharp, clear concise sentences and proper grammar structure. Try to keep the sentence length at less than a maximum of fifteen words. Please refrain from employing endless sentences and incorrect grammar. Employ spell check and grammar check and try to utilize the Writing Center to assist in structure and editing of the effort. Paragraph 2 should cite and explain the reason Why of the subject according to the textbook. In citing sources for this effort, I want the title, author, copyright date and publishing house named. This paragraph should run no more than four or less sentences of direct material. Paragraph 3 should present the methods of How the effort or action was undertaken according to the text source. Each of these sentences describing How the effort is undertaken should be like the lead sentence of a new paragraph. You must have a minimum of three how’s and a maximum of five how’s.  Paragraph 4 should define the Result according to the textbook. Limit this to three sentences. Paragraph 5 should employ the same format as paragraph 2 to cite and describe the Why from the   Second College Level Source. Paragraph 6 needs to define the methods How from the Second Source in the order the author provides. Often the same reasons are given for how a structure or event took place but the order is different and this affects the context of the paper and the result. Paragraph 7 needs to explain the Result as defined from the second source. Paragraph 8 defines the Why from your third source. Again employ the structure of the 2nd and 5th paragraph to cite this source and define it. Paragraph 9 defines the How of the third source in the order and context presented. Paragraph 10 explains the result according to the third source as structured in paragraphs 4 and 7 .  Paragraph 11 defines your interpretation of the resources. You will either state that according to your research and reflection you found one of the sources to most accurately reflect what you have discovered via critical thought to be the correct interpretation of the subject or that, because of your efforts, none of the sources met your criteria for correctly defining or explaining the Why , How , and Result of the Subject assigned. This should be accomplished in no more than two sentences. According to my research and reflection, my _______     source correctly defines the events and actions that were presented by the     assignment. Therefore , this is     my defense of my selection. According     to my studies,  The______     provided me with a superior     understanding of the events and their impacts to __________. The text     was shallow / brief /      superficial in its definition of the     issues and events that led to conflict and far too s ...

1. The 1st paragraph
will define the
Who
,
What
,
When
and
Where
of the assigned subject in no less than two or more than four
sentences. I want sharp, clear concise sentences and proper
grammar structure. Try to keep the sentence length at less than
a maximum of fifteen words. Please refrain from employing
endless sentences and incorrect grammar. Employ spell check
and grammar check and try to utilize the Writing Center to
assist in structure and editing of the effort.
Paragraph
2
should cite and explain the reason
Why
of the subject according to the textbook. In citing sources for
this effort, I want the title, author, copyright date and
publishing house named. This paragraph should run no more
than four or less sentences of direct material.
Paragraph

2. 3
should present the methods of
How
the effort or action was undertaken according to the text
source. Each of these sentences describing How the effort is
undertaken should be like the lead sentence of a new paragraph.
You must have a minimum of three how’s and a maximum of
five how’s.
Paragraph
4
should define the
Result
according to the textbook. Limit this to three sentences.
Paragraph
5
should employ the same format as paragraph
2
to cite and describe the
Why
from the
Second College Level Source.
Paragraph
6
needs to define the methods
How
from the Second Source in the order the author provides. Often
the same reasons are given for how a structure or event took

3. place but the order is different and this affects the context of
the paper and the result.
Paragraph
7
needs to explain the
Result
as defined from the second source.
Paragraph
8
defines the
Why
from your third source. Again employ the structure of the
2nd
and
5th
paragraph to cite this source and define it.
Paragraph
9
defines the
How
of the third source in the order and context presented.
Paragraph
10
explains the
result

4. according to the third source as structured in paragraphs
4
and
7
.
Paragraph
11
defines your interpretation of the resources. You will either
state that according to your research and reflection you found
one of the sources to most accurately reflect what you have
discovered via critical thought to be the correct interpretation of
the subject or that, because of your efforts, none of the sources
met your criteria for correctly defining or explaining the
Why
,
How
, and
Result
of the Subject assigned. This should be accomplished in no
more than two sentences.
According to my research and reflection, my _______ source
correctly defines the events and actions that were presented by
the assignment.
Therefore
, this is my defense of my selection.

5. According to my studies,
The______ provided me with a
superior
understanding of the events and their impacts to
__________.
The text was
shallow
/
brief
/
superficial
in its definition of the issues and events that led to conflict
and far
too
short
sighted
in assuming the…
Ideas of ____________ were discounted in this book to the
detriment
of the interpretation of the events.
Sources are the same:
compared to…just like …similarly…likewise…
Sources are different
: …in contrast…however… on the other hand…conversely…
Paragraph

6. 12
presents either your defense of the selection of your
interpretation according to your research. This paragraph has no
length requirement because you have to personally structure
your defense or new interpretation[CAA1] . (This is where you
get to be the
judge
. Use constructive criticism.)
Remember, college level sources are peer-reviewed data and
never include encyclopedias, dictionaries, and lives of the
presidents or any other short source. I will immediately fail any
student utilizing Wikipedia sourcing. Your source can be from
the internet if the citation includes org, lib, edu, or mil.
Generally, you will find that you cannot meet the requirements
of the paper in less than five pages of work and certainly need
no more than ten pages to complete the effort. Stay concise and
define specific reasons for your selections and define each how
in a declarative sentence. Don’t throw data at the effort. Provide
direct and simple interpretations so that a clear summation is
achieved.
Good luck and maintain this goal: if you cannot explain it, you
cannot employ it. This is a
critical thinking
effort that requires you make determinations according to your
research and what you have
[CAA1]comp contrast words
The 1st paragraph
will define the
Who
,

7. What
,
When
and
Where
of the assigned subject in no less than two or more than four
sentences. I want sharp, clear concise sentences and proper
grammar structure. Try to keep the sentence length at less than
a maximum of fifteen words. Please refrain from employing
endless sentences and incorrect grammar. Employ spell check
and grammar check and try to utilize the Writing Center to
assist in structure and editing of the effort.
Paragraph
2
should cite and explain the reason
Why
of the subject according to the textbook. In citing sources for
this effort, I want the title, author, copyright date and
publishing house named. This paragraph should run no more
than four or less sentences of direct material.
Paragraph
3
should present the methods of
How
the effort or action was undertaken according to the text
source. Each of these sentences describing How the effort is
undertaken should be like the lead sentence of a new paragraph.
You must have a minimum of three how’s and a maximum of
five how’s.

8. Paragraph
4
should define the
Result
according to the textbook. Limit this to three sentences.
Paragraph
5
should employ the same format as paragraph
2
to cite and describe the
Why
from the
Second College Level Source.
Paragraph
6
needs to define the methods
How
from the Second Source in the order the author provides. Often
the same reasons are given for how a structure or event took
place but the order is different and this affects the context of
the paper and the result.
Paragraph
7
needs to explain the

9. Result
as defined from the second source.
Paragraph
8
defines the
Why
from your third source. Again employ the structure of the
2nd
and
5th
paragraph to cite this source and define it.
Paragraph
9
defines the
How
of the third source in the order and context presented.
Paragraph
10
explains the
result
according to the third source as structured in paragraphs
4
and
7
.
Paragraph

10. 11
defines your interpretation of the resources. You will either
state that according to your research and reflection you found
one of the sources to most accurately reflect what you have
discovered via critical thought to be the correct interpretation of
the subject or that, because of your efforts, none of the sources
met your criteria for correctly defining or explaining the
Why
,
How
, and
Result
of the Subject assigned. This should be accomplished in no
more than two sentences.
According to my research and reflection, my _______ source
correctly defines the events and actions that were presented by
the assignment.
Therefore
, this is my defense of my selection.
According to my studies,
The______ provided me with a
superior
understanding of the events and their impacts to
__________.

11. The text was
shallow
/
brief
/
superficial
in its definition of the issues and events that led to conflict
and far
too
short
sighted
in assuming the…
Ideas of ____________ were discounted in this book to the
detriment
of the interpretation of the events.
Sources are the same:
compared to…just like …similarly…likewise…
Sources are different
: …in contrast…however… on the other hand…conversely…
Paragraph
12
presents either your defense of the selection of your
interpretation according to your research. This paragraph has no
length requirement because you have to personally structure
your defense or new interpretation[CAA1] . (This is where you
get to be the
judge
. Use constructive criticism.)

12. Remember, college level sources are peer-reviewed data and
never include encyclopedias, dictionaries, and lives of the
presidents or any other short source. I will immediately fail any
student utilizing Wikipedia sourcing. Your source can be from
the internet if the citation includes org, lib, edu, or mil.
Generally, you will find that you cannot meet the requirements
of the paper in less than five pages of work and certainly need
no more than ten pages to complete the effort. Stay concise and
define specific reasons for your selections and define each how
in a declarative sentence. Don’t throw data at the effort. Provide
direct and simple interpretations so that a clear summation is
achieved.
Good luck and maintain this goal: if you cannot explain it, you
cannot employ it. This is a
critical thinking
effort that requires you make determinations according to your
research and what you have
[CAA1]comp contrast words
The 1st paragraph
will define the
Who
,
What
,
When
and
Where
of the assigned subject in no less than two or more than four
sentences. I want sharp, clear concise sentences and proper
grammar structure. Try to keep the sentence length at less than

13. a maximum of fifteen words. Please refrain from employing
endless sentences and incorrect grammar. Employ spell check
and grammar check and try to utilize the Writing Center to
assist in structure and editing of the effort.
Paragraph
2
should cite and explain the reason
Why
of the subject according to the textbook. In citing sources for
this effort, I want the title, author, copyright date and
publishing house named. This paragraph should run no more
than four or less sentences of direct material.
Paragraph
3
should present the methods of
How
the effort or action was undertaken according to the text
source. Each of these sentences describing How the effort is
undertaken should be like the lead sentence of a new paragraph.
You must have a minimum of three how’s and a maximum of
five how’s.
Paragraph
4
should define the
Result
according to the textbook. Limit this to three sentences.

14. Paragraph
5
should employ the same format as paragraph
2
to cite and describe the
Why
from the
Second College Level Source.
Paragraph
6
needs to define the methods
How
from the Second Source in the order the author provides. Often
the same reasons are given for how a structure or event took
place but the order is different and this affects the context of
the paper and the result.
Paragraph
7
needs to explain the
Result
as defined from the second source.
Paragraph
8
defines the

15. Why
from your third source. Again employ the structure of the
2nd
and
5th
paragraph to cite this source and define it.
Paragraph
9
defines the
How
of the third source in the order and context presented.
Paragraph
10
explains the
result
according to the third source as structured in paragraphs
4
and
7
.
Paragraph
11
defines your interpretation of the resources. You will either
state that according to your research and reflection you found
one of the sources to most accurately reflect what you have
discovered via critical thought to be the correct interpretation of
the subject or that, because of your efforts, none of the sources
met your criteria for correctly defining or explaining the

16. Why
,
How
, and
Result
of the Subject assigned. This should be accomplished in no
more than two sentences.
According to my research and reflection, my _______ source
correctly defines the events and actions that were presented by
the assignment.
Therefore
, this is my defense of my selection.
According to my studies,
The______ provided me with a
superior
understanding of the events and their impacts to
__________.
The text was
shallow
/
brief
/
superficial
in its definition of the issues and events that led to conflict
and far

17. too
short
sighted
in assuming the…
Ideas of ____________ were discounted in this book to the
detriment
of the interpretation of the events.
Sources are the same:
compared to…just like …similarly…likewise…
Sources are different
: …in contrast…however… on the other hand…conversely…
Paragraph
12
presents either your defense of the selection of your
interpretation according to your research. This paragraph has no
length requirement because you have to personally structure
your defense or new interpretation[CAA1] . (This is where you
get to be the
judge
. Use constructive criticism.)
Remember, college level sources are peer-reviewed data and
never include encyclopedias, dictionaries, and lives of the
presidents or any other short source. I will immediately fail any
student utilizing Wikipedia sourcing. Your source can be from
the internet if the citation includes org, lib, edu, or mil.
Generally, you will find that you cannot meet the requirements

18. of the paper in less than five pages of work and certainly need
no more than ten pages to complete the effort. Stay concise and
define specific reasons for your selections and define each how
in a declarative sentence. Don’t throw data at the effort. Provide
direct and simple interpretations so that a clear summation is
achieved.
Good luck and maintain this goal: if you cannot explain it, you
cannot employ it. This is a
critical thinking
effort that requires you make determinations according to your
research and what you have
[CAA1]comp contrast words
Your Research Paper heading should be presented as this paper
is set up, the research title, class section and your name,
centered on separate single spaced lines. There is no need for a
cover sheet or folder cover for this effort. Unlike this guide
your paper should be double spaced between lines. This paper
must be typed or word-processed to be accepted. Students will
employ fonts no smaller than 8 (elite) or larger than 12 (pica)
for the type size of the presentation. This assignment is a
minimum of 1000 words.
The first paragraph will define the Who, What, When and
Where of the assigned subject in no less than two or more than
four sentences. I want sharp, clear concise sentences and proper
grammar structure. Try to keep the sentence length at less than
a maximum of fifteen words. Please refrain from employing
endless sentences and incorrect grammar. Employ spell check
and grammar check and try to utilize the Writing Center to
assist in structure and editing of the effort

19. .
Paragraph two should cite and explain the reason Why of the
subject according to the textbook. In citing sources for this
effort I want the title, author, copyright date and publishing
house named. This paragraph should run no more than four
sentences of direct material or less.
Paragraph three should present the methods of How the effort or
action was undertaken according to the text source. Each of
these sentences describing How the effort is undertaken should
be like the lead sentence of a new paragraph. You must have a
minimum of three how’s and more if available.
Paragraph four should define the Result according to the
textbook. Limit this to three sentences.
Paragraph five should employ the same format as paragraph two
to cite and describe the Why from the Second College Level
Source.
Paragraph six needs to define the methods How from the Second
Source in the order the author provides. Often the same reasons
are given for how a structure or event took place but the order is
different and this affects the context of the paper and the result.
List every how presented in this source, not just three.
Paragraph seven needs to explain the Result as defined from the
second source.
Paragraph eight defines the Why from your third source. Again
employ the structure of the second and fifth paragraph to cite
this source and define it.
Paragraph nine defines the How of the third source in the order
and context presented.

20. Paragraph ten explains the result according to the third source
as structured in paragraphs four and seven.
Paragraph eleven defines your interpretation of the resources.
You will either state that
according to your research and reflection you found one of the
sources to most accurately reflect what you have discovered via
critical thought to be the correct interpretation of the subject.
Therefore this is the defense of your selection
or that
because of your efforts none of the sources met your criteria for
correctly defining or explaining the Why, How, and Result of
the Subject assigned.
Therefore this is your interpretation of the material assigned
. This should be accomplished in just two sentences.
Paragraph twelve presents either your defense of the selection
of your interpretation according to your research. This
paragraph has no length requirement because you have to
personally structure your defense or new interpretation.
Remember, college level sources are peer reviewed data and
never include encyclopedias, dictionaries, lives of the
presidents or any other short source. I will immediately fail any
student utilizing Wikipedia sourcing. Your source can be from
the internet if the citation includes org, lib. edu. or mil.
Generally you will find that you cannot meet the requirements
of the paper in less than five pages of work and certainly need
no more than ten pages to complete the effort. Stay concise and
define specific reasons for your selections and define each how
in a declarative sentence. Don’t through data at the effort.
Provide direct and simple interpretations so that a clear

21. summation is achieved.
Good luck and maintain this goal; if you cannot explain it you
cannot employ it. This is a critical thinking effort that requires
you make determinations according to your research and what
you have determined from the resources you have gathered.
There is no right answer, only a conclusion based upon
employing the structures of rational thought to determine the
truth from the effort.
��W�