This document describes an independent validation services company and provides an overview of their offerings. They offer consulting, managed testing services, and testing as a service (TaaS). They have a global presence with multi-shore delivery and provide services like functional testing, automation testing, and performance testing using tools like QTP, Selenium, and HP Quality Center. They have a proven methodology for both manual and automated testing that follows a defined process.

1. Independent Validation Services
For:
July 5, 2012

2. Agenda
• Corporate Overview
– Service Offerings
– Global Presence
– Customers
• Independent Verification Service Offerings
– Consulting/Execution
– Managed Testing Service
– T-a-a-S – Testing as a Service
– Methodology
– Resource Models
• Case Study

3. About Us
Corporate Overview Our Mission
Founded in 1994, Company To be our Clients’ Partner of
Headquarters in Dayton, OH Choice through our
Centers of
Specializing in Advisory
Services, Outsourcing Transformation, and to
Process, and IT Led Business drive continuous
Enablement improvement through
the professional growth
Multi-shore Delivery Model and active involvement of
Providing Services Globally our people.

4. Global Locations

5. Sample Clients

6. Why do clients partner with Corbus?
Competitive Headcount
Low Cross Delay/Shift
Positioning
Country
in Market
Sourcing
Advantage
Complete
Transparency
Self
Funding
Focus on Quality, Model
Cost, Delivery
and Compliance Access to ‘Best in
through SCL’s Class’ Global
and KPI’s Practice
Procurement
Flexibility

7. Our Services
Web Application Spend Analytics Social Media
Development
Mobility Solutions Independent Maintenance
Validation Services Repair & Operations
Project Management Business Analytics Strategic
Office Sourcing

8. Independent Validation Services
Key Capabilities
Testing/Independent Validation Services Focus Areas/Specialties
• Advisory Consulting – CoE Set-up, Test • Functional Testing
Process Assessment and Tool • Automation Testing
recommendations • ERP Testing (SAP, Siebel & CRM)
• Testing As a Service – Develop Testing • E-Commerce Testing
processes and deliver ongoing testing
service • Performance Testing
• End-to-end Testing – From assessment to • Business Intelligence Testing (COGNOS,
set-up to maintenance INFORMATICA, Micro Strategy)
• Specialized Testing – Industry specific and • Mobile Applications Testing
SDLC specific services
• Talent Supply
PEOPLE PROCESS TOOLS
• CSTE Professionals • QTP
• ISO 9001 Certification
• CMST Professionals • Rational products
• SEI CMMI Level 5
• ISTQB Certified (Functional Tool,
Certification
Functional Tester,
Professionals • TMMI Certification
• HP Certified Performance Tool)
• Six Sigma
• SilkTest & SilkPerformer
Professionals – QTP, QC, • ITIL
LoadRunner • Selenium
• Segue Certified SilkTest • HP Quality Center
professionals • LoadRunner

9. Independent Validation Services

10. Our proven methodology for manual testing
Input
• Learning from previous releases • Use Cases • Use Cases • Build • User Acceptance Test
• Project Documents & Use Cases • Project Documents • Traceability Matrix • Integration Test Cases Cases
10 • High Level Project Schedule • FP Estimates • HLD • System Test Cases
• Project Schedule • LLD • Test Data
• Build/Release Code
Defect Verification Test Closure
Test Execution
Test Design
Test Planning
Requirement
Activities
• Participation in • Testing Phase Kick Off • Preparation of Integration • Test Execution • Support UAT
Requirement Gathering • Test Plan Preparation and System Test Cases • Execution of System • UAT Defect Verification
• Use Case Review • Team Onboard • Test Data Design Test Cases • Post Release Defect
• Preparation of User • Test Schedule • HLD & LLD Review • Execution of Integration Analysis
Acceptance Test Cases • Code Review Test Cases
• Regression Testing
Output
• Use Case Review Report • Test Plan • System Test Cases • Test Results • Customer Sign Off
• Traceability Matrix • Test Strategy • Integration Test Cases • Defect Reports • Post Release Defect
• UAT Test Cases • Communication Plan • Defect Metrics • Corbus Testing Sign Off Analysis Report
• PMC process • Review Reports
• Risk Log

11. Our proven methodology for automated testing
Input
11 •Manual Test Cases • Automatable Test Cases • Automation Coding • Unit Tested Test Script • Successful Regression Run
•Requirement Specification • Existing PM Standard and Guidelines
Document Practices • Test Case Review Checklist
Defect Verification Test Closure
Test Execution
Test Scripting
Test Planning
Requirement
Activities
• Identification of • Automation Test Plan • Test Case Review for • Handover the Test Script • Post Automation
Automation Candidate Preparation Modularity to the Test Execution Learning's, Best
• Identification of • Team Onboard • Script Generation Team Practices
Regression Test Cases • Automation Effort • Unit Testing and Debug of • Reusable Library
• Identification of Smoke Estimate and ROI Test Script
and Sanity Test Cases • Automation Test Schedule • Batch Run of Test Script
Output
• List of Automation • Automation Test Plan • Test Script • Regression Test Result • Automation Best Practices
Candidates • Communication Plan • Automation Framework • Smoke Test Result Guideline
• PMC process • Reusable Library • Sanity Test Result • List of Reusable
• Risk Log • Test Result Components
• Effort and ROI Sheet

12. Sample dashboards and reports that are part of our deliverables
12 Priority of Reported Defects Severity of Reported Defects
40.00%
40.00%
35.00%
30.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
20.00% 15.00%
10.00%
10.00% 5.00%
0.00%
Blocker
Critical
Normal
Trivial
Major
Minor
Enhancement
0.00%
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5
Total num ber of defects = 145 Total num ber of defects = 145
Bug Classification Pareto Analysis
40.00% 120.00 % of defect
35.00%
100.00 % Cum ulative Num ber
30.00%
80.00
25.00%
60.00
20.00%
15.00% 40.00
10.00% 20.00
5.00% 0.00
Functional
Exception
Language
Look and
Handling
Design Error
Inconsistent
Programming
Performance
0.00%
Functional
Exception
Error
Language
Feel
Look and
Error
Handling
Design Error
Inconsistent
Programming
Performance
Error
Error
Feel
Error
Error
Error
Error

13. We offer flexible resource models to meet any needs
Onsite “Nearshore” Offshore “Blended”
• Work executed at • Similar to onsite • TaaS, Managed Services • 24/7 testing
client’s premises engagement • Operational Efficiency • Lower Cost
• Ready availability of • Project ran from Corbus • Process Expertise • Easier Coordination
skilled resources locations in client’s • Maximized Value • Easy ramp-up ramp-
• Extension of client’s geographical area • Optimized Costs down of resources
team • Market proximity
• Direct control over
project
Engagement models can be tailored to meet specific needs

14. Value Proposition
• CSTE Professionals
• CMST Professionals
• ISTQB Certified Professionals
• HP Certified Professionals – QTP, QC, LoadRunner
People • Segue Certified SilkTest professionals
• Early Identification of Defect
• Reduction in Total Cost of Quality
• Automation of Regression Scenarios
• Onsite Offshore Model
Process
• Ability to ramp up in niche technologies using in-house boot camp
training capsules
• Domain Expertise
• Centers of Transformation (COT)
Technology

15. Case Study
• Pharmaceuticals industry
• CRM Dynamics
• Business Intelligence

16. Physician Publishing System
The Glue Factors
 User friendly interface to Scan or Upload
the PHR
 Online PHR review, approve, and
rejection by Physician
 Availability of PHR on members portal
without any delay
Business Process Limitations
 Data information check of PHR for
• Generation of PHR on CD’s, and inability to validate the PHR
• Higher Paper and Mail based process integrity
• Prone to PHI errors due to manual process  Monitoring of response time for multiple
• Overall process to receive PHR was time consuming
Physicians access at same time
• File transfer discrepancies due to many manual batch
processes and lack of automation

17. MDVIP CRM Dynamics
The Glue Factors
 Creation and execution of Test Cases for the
Physician Entity and Sales Cycle Entity
which was the main need of the business.
 Controlling the deployment of builds on the
servers and decommissioning the previous
version of CRM successfully.
 Integrity of data by creating cubes and
Business Process Limitations using high level SQL queries.
• Environment for testing was executed using Citrix which is used
for remote access.  Performing load testing and Stress testing
• Upgrading the existing platform to a newer version of CRM.
• No documentation or test cases prior to this kind of to ensure that the response time for each
implementation.
• Outlook integration with CRM and Exchange Server’s response transaction is quick and smooth.
time and effectiveness was a challenge.
• Lots of reports were required to be migrated and modified in
order to be compatible in the new version.

18. Business Intelligence (BI) Solutions
The Glue Factors
 The primary focus of our DW/BI testing is to
ensure competent and perfect database
structures, ETL processes, front-end access and
BI reports generations processes completely
support the client requirements.
 we have well defined and structured approach
to data warehouse testing
 Reporting Efficiency
 Dashboard Report Testing
 Canned Report Testing
• Data Extraction, Transformation & Cube Testing
• Independently validate information upstream, downstream  Testing Artifacts:
and within the ETL 1. Test Plan
• Data Quality Checking 2. Test Cases
3. Test Execution
• Data validation at different stages
4. Test results
• Correctness and Completeness Test
 Data security testing can be done
• Aggregation Level Data check
• Data Accuracy  To increase credibility of BI Reports
• Non Functional Testing should be performed on Reports.

19. Questions?
2835 Miami Village Drive
Miamisburg, OH 45342
Eugene Breger Phone: 847-331-5554
Director, Sales Fax: 847-205-7219
ebreger@chicagobooth.edu