This document discusses how and when to measure the effectiveness of internal communications within an organization. It recommends measuring communications annually through surveys, before and after specific communication campaigns, and periodically to track approaches over time. The document outlines what aspects of communication to measure, such as awareness, attitudes, behaviors, functional aspects of messages, and impact on business goals. It also discusses how to isolate the impact of communication from other variables and calculate the financial value of effective communication. Qualitative and quantitative techniques are described for measurement.
Internal communication surveys are conducted yearly and may include additional questions to provide insights into communication effectiveness. It is important to measure awareness, attitudes, and knowledge before and after major communication efforts and initiatives to assess their impact. Regular measurement helps communicators understand shifting attitudes over time and tailor messages appropriately. Specific events can also be measured through temperature checks and pulse surveys to collect feedback. Key performance indicators should be benchmarked and tracked over time to identify emerging issues. Communication measurements may include reach, understanding, behavior changes, and impact on business goals. Both quantitative and qualitative methods can be used.
The document discusses best practices for measuring the effectiveness of internal communications through surveys and other techniques. It recommends measuring baseline knowledge and attitudes before a communication effort, as well as measuring impact, reach, understanding, and changes in behavior and business outcomes after the effort. Both quantitative metrics like survey responses and qualitative feedback through forums and interviews should be used. Comparisons to control groups can help isolate the impact of communications from other factors. The goal is to demonstrate the value of communications and continually improve future efforts.
Measuring internal communications is important to assess effectiveness and impact. Communications should be measured yearly through surveys, before and after significant campaigns, and periodically to track attitudes and benchmark against KPIs. What is measured includes existing knowledge and attitudes, messages received, behavior changes, and impact on company goals. Qualitative techniques like focus groups and forums provide insights. Bias is reduced through random sampling, control groups, and consistent timing of measurements. Communicating survey results encourages participation.
This document discusses best practices for measuring the effectiveness of internal communications. It recommends measuring communications yearly through in-depth surveys, before and after major communication efforts or campaigns to establish baselines and assess impact, and periodically to track approaches and key performance indicators over time. It also provides examples of what to measure, such as audience perceptions, changes in behavior, and impact on business goals. Finally, it discusses tools and techniques for measurement, both quantitative and qualitative, and how to avoid biases and encourage survey participation.
This document outlines 8 key steps for conducting a successful communications audit:
1. Determine the scope of the audit - whether it will focus on internal, external, or both communications.
2. Choose a methodology such as interviews, surveys, or focus groups to collect data.
3. Evaluate current collateral, processes, channels and how successful they have been.
4. Commence data collection from stakeholders using consistent methods.
5. Analyze media coverage and sentiment if reviewing external communications.
6. Involve employees to understand internal communications.
7. Conduct a SWOT or PEST analysis to identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.
8. Objectively review all data and make recommendations to develop
The document discusses communication audits, which involve evaluating an organization's communication processes and systems. A communication audit aims to determine if all stakeholders are receiving intended messages, identify strengths and weaknesses, and indicate areas for improvement. The key steps of conducting an audit involve securing management commitment, identifying current practices, setting success standards, developing an action plan, and measuring results. Common audit methods include questionnaires, interviews, focus groups, and analyzing communication outputs and stakeholder feedback. The goals are to improve communication quality and relationships within the organization.
Internal communication surveys are conducted yearly and may include additional questions to provide insights into communication effectiveness. It is important to measure awareness, attitudes, and knowledge before and after major communication efforts and initiatives to assess their impact. Regular measurement helps communicators understand shifting attitudes over time and tailor messages appropriately. Specific events can also be measured through temperature checks and pulse surveys to collect feedback. Key performance indicators should be benchmarked and tracked over time to identify emerging issues. Communication measurements may include reach, understanding, behavior changes, and impact on business goals. Both quantitative and qualitative methods can be used.
The document discusses best practices for measuring the effectiveness of internal communications through surveys and other techniques. It recommends measuring baseline knowledge and attitudes before a communication effort, as well as measuring impact, reach, understanding, and changes in behavior and business outcomes after the effort. Both quantitative metrics like survey responses and qualitative feedback through forums and interviews should be used. Comparisons to control groups can help isolate the impact of communications from other factors. The goal is to demonstrate the value of communications and continually improve future efforts.
Measuring internal communications is important to assess effectiveness and impact. Communications should be measured yearly through surveys, before and after significant campaigns, and periodically to track attitudes and benchmark against KPIs. What is measured includes existing knowledge and attitudes, messages received, behavior changes, and impact on company goals. Qualitative techniques like focus groups and forums provide insights. Bias is reduced through random sampling, control groups, and consistent timing of measurements. Communicating survey results encourages participation.
This document discusses best practices for measuring the effectiveness of internal communications. It recommends measuring communications yearly through in-depth surveys, before and after major communication efforts or campaigns to establish baselines and assess impact, and periodically to track approaches and key performance indicators over time. It also provides examples of what to measure, such as audience perceptions, changes in behavior, and impact on business goals. Finally, it discusses tools and techniques for measurement, both quantitative and qualitative, and how to avoid biases and encourage survey participation.
This document outlines 8 key steps for conducting a successful communications audit:
1. Determine the scope of the audit - whether it will focus on internal, external, or both communications.
2. Choose a methodology such as interviews, surveys, or focus groups to collect data.
3. Evaluate current collateral, processes, channels and how successful they have been.
4. Commence data collection from stakeholders using consistent methods.
5. Analyze media coverage and sentiment if reviewing external communications.
6. Involve employees to understand internal communications.
7. Conduct a SWOT or PEST analysis to identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.
8. Objectively review all data and make recommendations to develop
The document discusses communication audits, which involve evaluating an organization's communication processes and systems. A communication audit aims to determine if all stakeholders are receiving intended messages, identify strengths and weaknesses, and indicate areas for improvement. The key steps of conducting an audit involve securing management commitment, identifying current practices, setting success standards, developing an action plan, and measuring results. Common audit methods include questionnaires, interviews, focus groups, and analyzing communication outputs and stakeholder feedback. The goals are to improve communication quality and relationships within the organization.
This document outlines the process for conducting a communications audit and developing a communications strategy. It discusses how communications audits can help organizations understand what communication efforts are working well and where there are opportunities for improvement. A 10-step process is provided for conducting a thorough audit, including collecting past communications, surveying internal and external stakeholders, analyzing media coverage, and conducting a SWOT analysis. The goal is to use audit findings to inform the creation of a detailed strategic communications plan.
This document discusses the purpose and process of conducting a communications audit. A communications audit involves systematically examining an organization's communications functions, processes, and stakeholders to evaluate its effectiveness and identify opportunities for improvement. It can help provide a baseline assessment of the current communications strategy, identify strengths and weaknesses, and make recommendations to make communications more clear, consistent, and effective at reaching goals and key audiences. The communications audit process involves gathering information through tools like surveys, interviews, and analysis of past communications; evaluating stakeholders' perspectives; and analyzing data to report findings and proposed recommendations.
Running a successful Communications Audit by One clear MessageRichard Riche
Business evolves over time as do stakeholders, audiences and communication channels. A Communications Audit can help your organisation become a better communicator.
Port Nelson is a port facility jointly owned by two local councils that handles cargo and vessel visits. It employs 229 people across various roles. The audit found Port Nelson communicates effectively through documents like its annual report and meetings, and employees are aware of its vision and values. However, improvements could be made. There is a lack of understanding between departments that see each other as "us" and "them". Decision-making processes sometimes lack communication. The organization could better communicate change and involve employees. A crisis plan is also needed. Overall, the audit found Port Nelson's communication system is effective but could be strengthened through more face-to-face engagement during changes, increased transparency, and empowering employees.
This 3 sentence summary provides the key information from the Global Internal Communications Audit Report:
The audit examined AIESEC's internal communication processes, finding that the major channels for global communications are social media groups like Facebook and the global newsletter, though only 0.3% of over 80,000 AIESECers responded to the survey. It recommends ensuring timely delivery of the global newsletter, focusing on engaging Facebook content to increase usage, and developing content for specialized Facebook groups for trainees and team leaders to improve engagement.
UNC Movement of Youth conducted a communication audit to evaluate its internal and external communication strategies. Based on survey responses from staff and mentors, UNC Movement of Youth's communication was deemed generally effective, but there is room for improvement. Specifically, strengthening social media presence and improving communication between mentors, mentees, and parents were identified as areas that need work. An interview with the site director revealed that direct communication between mentors and parents could help mentors better connect with mentees. The site director also saw a need for consistency across Movement of Youth chapters through a site manual and app. Overall, the audit found UNC Movement of Youth's communication to be adequate but in need of enhancements, particularly regarding social media, mentor
This document discusses different methods for evaluating public relations programs and measuring their effectiveness. It describes evaluating objectives, production outputs, media exposure and impressions, audience awareness, attitudes and actions. Methods include compiling press clippings, surveys, baseline studies, tracking specific metrics like website hits or event attendance. Evaluation should happen throughout the planning and implementation process by establishing clear objectives and metrics upfront. Measuring outcomes against objectives allows practitioners to assess success and opportunities for improvement.
Barcelona summit declaration slides update. revised with delegate comments fo...Eric Schwartzman
This document outlines proposed principles for measuring public relations and communications. It aims to establish clear standards to make the profession more credible and impactful. The seven principles address key issues like the importance of goal setting, measuring both quantity and quality of media coverage, rejecting advertising value equivalents as the measure of PR value, how to measure social media, prioritizing outcomes over outputs, measuring business results where possible, and the importance of transparency and replicability in measurement. The document is open for public comment through July 15 before being finalized.
The document outlines the key steps in the public relations process:
1. Research is conducted to define problems and understand audiences. Various research methods are described.
2. Planning and programming involves setting objectives, budgets, schedules and strategies based on research findings.
3. Actions are taken and communication is implemented to achieve program goals using appropriate tactics.
4. Evaluation assesses program preparation, implementation and results to determine effectiveness and make adjustments.
Barcelona principles for pr measurement slides final 22 july 2010AMEC
The document outlines 7 principles for measuring public relations efforts: 1) Goal setting and measurement are important, 2) Measuring outcomes rather than just outputs is preferred, 3) Business results should be measured when possible, 4) Media measurement requires assessing both quantity and quality, 5) Advertising value equivalents do not reflect the true value of PR, 6) Social media can and should be measured, and 7) Transparency and replicability are key to sound measurement.
This document provides an overview of public relations including:
- Definitions of public relations from Lee and Edwards, Louis Bernays, and the PRSA.
- The objectives of PR including creating awareness, acceptance, trust, image, cooperation, and recognition.
- The advantages of PR such as credibility, reach, and cost effectiveness.
- The disadvantages including lack of direct control, difficulty measuring success, and lack of guaranteed results.
- The importance of PR in building brand values, community relations, and brand image.
- The roles of PR management including communication, crisis, relationship, resource, reputation, and risk management.
Measurement and evaluation of media coverage - India - Public RelationsMoses Gomes
This presentation covers the different arguments on media coverage analysis. For a long time the Public relations industry in India has been facing one of the major hurdles on coverage analysis. Here is my perspective on how media coverage can be measured.
Research is crucial for successful public relations efforts. The purpose of PR research is to develop effective strategies and measure campaign effectiveness by understanding audiences, contexts, and impacts. Research methods include qualitative tactics like interviews and observations, as well as quantitative surveys and questionnaires. Research topics encompass public perceptions, internal/external environments, and metrics like media coverage and outcomes. Overall, research is the key to strategic planning and evaluation in public relations.
The survey found that 48% of executive education attendees did not compare different programs before enrolling. Attendees were likely to recommend their program and senior leadership were an important referral source. Programs tailored to specific functions were very appealing. The survey included over 500 respondents who were senior professionals across a variety of industries. Most learned about programs through word-of-mouth and valued how the program would benefit their organization over cost or time off work. The program helped build relationships, gain skills, and solve organizational challenges. Attendees would recommend their program to colleagues. A tailored program was the most appealing feature compared to cost, duration, or prestige.
Hugh Anderson presented on PR measurement and the need to move beyond traditional metrics like AVEs. He outlined a new framework using a three-tiered approach measuring program outputs, outcomes, and business outcomes. New metrics could include social media engagement, website traffic and conversions. Tools like Google Analytics, Inkybee and research from organizations like the Coalition for PR Research Standards were highlighted to help practitioners more effectively measure PR impact.
Based on the flowcharts, how would you respond as the organization in each situation?
For Subway: This would likely be classified as an accidental crisis with low damage and no victims. An appropriate response would be clarification - acknowledge the size issue and commit to addressing it.
For Children's Hospital: This involves victims (the family) and likely high damage due to the serious medical outcome. An appropriate initial response would be mortification - express regret/apology for the outcome and commit to investigating how it occurred to prevent future occurrences.
There are several different models and metrics used to evaluate PR campaigns, Napier take you through several to ensure you are evaluating your campaigns effectively.
Best Practices & New Ideas in PR MeasurementTim Marklein
PRSA St. Louis presentation on "Best Practices & New Ideas in PR Measurement" by Tim Marklein, executive VP of measurement and strategy for Weber Shandwick
Purpose: To advance public relations measurement by recommending metrics and approaches for evaluating public relations’ influence on four main business outcomes:
o Financial
o Reputation / Brand Equity
o Employees and other Internal Publics
o Public Policy
This document discusses communications measurement and provides guidance on whether to conduct measurement internally or hire external professionals. It covers what measurement is, why it's important, where it can be applied, and how to get leadership buy-in. Key points include that measurement shows what works well or not in communications programs, knowledge is important to avoid unintended consequences, and measurement demonstrates value and alignment with organizational objectives. The document also provides tips on conducting simple do-it-yourself measures versus hiring experts for more complex projects, and emphasizes having a clear goal and applying results.
This document outlines the process for conducting a communications audit and developing a communications strategy. It discusses how communications audits can help organizations understand what communication efforts are working well and where there are opportunities for improvement. A 10-step process is provided for conducting a thorough audit, including collecting past communications, surveying internal and external stakeholders, analyzing media coverage, and conducting a SWOT analysis. The goal is to use audit findings to inform the creation of a detailed strategic communications plan.
This document discusses the purpose and process of conducting a communications audit. A communications audit involves systematically examining an organization's communications functions, processes, and stakeholders to evaluate its effectiveness and identify opportunities for improvement. It can help provide a baseline assessment of the current communications strategy, identify strengths and weaknesses, and make recommendations to make communications more clear, consistent, and effective at reaching goals and key audiences. The communications audit process involves gathering information through tools like surveys, interviews, and analysis of past communications; evaluating stakeholders' perspectives; and analyzing data to report findings and proposed recommendations.
Running a successful Communications Audit by One clear MessageRichard Riche
Business evolves over time as do stakeholders, audiences and communication channels. A Communications Audit can help your organisation become a better communicator.
Port Nelson is a port facility jointly owned by two local councils that handles cargo and vessel visits. It employs 229 people across various roles. The audit found Port Nelson communicates effectively through documents like its annual report and meetings, and employees are aware of its vision and values. However, improvements could be made. There is a lack of understanding between departments that see each other as "us" and "them". Decision-making processes sometimes lack communication. The organization could better communicate change and involve employees. A crisis plan is also needed. Overall, the audit found Port Nelson's communication system is effective but could be strengthened through more face-to-face engagement during changes, increased transparency, and empowering employees.
This 3 sentence summary provides the key information from the Global Internal Communications Audit Report:
The audit examined AIESEC's internal communication processes, finding that the major channels for global communications are social media groups like Facebook and the global newsletter, though only 0.3% of over 80,000 AIESECers responded to the survey. It recommends ensuring timely delivery of the global newsletter, focusing on engaging Facebook content to increase usage, and developing content for specialized Facebook groups for trainees and team leaders to improve engagement.
UNC Movement of Youth conducted a communication audit to evaluate its internal and external communication strategies. Based on survey responses from staff and mentors, UNC Movement of Youth's communication was deemed generally effective, but there is room for improvement. Specifically, strengthening social media presence and improving communication between mentors, mentees, and parents were identified as areas that need work. An interview with the site director revealed that direct communication between mentors and parents could help mentors better connect with mentees. The site director also saw a need for consistency across Movement of Youth chapters through a site manual and app. Overall, the audit found UNC Movement of Youth's communication to be adequate but in need of enhancements, particularly regarding social media, mentor
This document discusses different methods for evaluating public relations programs and measuring their effectiveness. It describes evaluating objectives, production outputs, media exposure and impressions, audience awareness, attitudes and actions. Methods include compiling press clippings, surveys, baseline studies, tracking specific metrics like website hits or event attendance. Evaluation should happen throughout the planning and implementation process by establishing clear objectives and metrics upfront. Measuring outcomes against objectives allows practitioners to assess success and opportunities for improvement.
Barcelona summit declaration slides update. revised with delegate comments fo...Eric Schwartzman
This document outlines proposed principles for measuring public relations and communications. It aims to establish clear standards to make the profession more credible and impactful. The seven principles address key issues like the importance of goal setting, measuring both quantity and quality of media coverage, rejecting advertising value equivalents as the measure of PR value, how to measure social media, prioritizing outcomes over outputs, measuring business results where possible, and the importance of transparency and replicability in measurement. The document is open for public comment through July 15 before being finalized.
The document outlines the key steps in the public relations process:
1. Research is conducted to define problems and understand audiences. Various research methods are described.
2. Planning and programming involves setting objectives, budgets, schedules and strategies based on research findings.
3. Actions are taken and communication is implemented to achieve program goals using appropriate tactics.
4. Evaluation assesses program preparation, implementation and results to determine effectiveness and make adjustments.
Barcelona principles for pr measurement slides final 22 july 2010AMEC
The document outlines 7 principles for measuring public relations efforts: 1) Goal setting and measurement are important, 2) Measuring outcomes rather than just outputs is preferred, 3) Business results should be measured when possible, 4) Media measurement requires assessing both quantity and quality, 5) Advertising value equivalents do not reflect the true value of PR, 6) Social media can and should be measured, and 7) Transparency and replicability are key to sound measurement.
This document provides an overview of public relations including:
- Definitions of public relations from Lee and Edwards, Louis Bernays, and the PRSA.
- The objectives of PR including creating awareness, acceptance, trust, image, cooperation, and recognition.
- The advantages of PR such as credibility, reach, and cost effectiveness.
- The disadvantages including lack of direct control, difficulty measuring success, and lack of guaranteed results.
- The importance of PR in building brand values, community relations, and brand image.
- The roles of PR management including communication, crisis, relationship, resource, reputation, and risk management.
Measurement and evaluation of media coverage - India - Public RelationsMoses Gomes
This presentation covers the different arguments on media coverage analysis. For a long time the Public relations industry in India has been facing one of the major hurdles on coverage analysis. Here is my perspective on how media coverage can be measured.
Research is crucial for successful public relations efforts. The purpose of PR research is to develop effective strategies and measure campaign effectiveness by understanding audiences, contexts, and impacts. Research methods include qualitative tactics like interviews and observations, as well as quantitative surveys and questionnaires. Research topics encompass public perceptions, internal/external environments, and metrics like media coverage and outcomes. Overall, research is the key to strategic planning and evaluation in public relations.
The survey found that 48% of executive education attendees did not compare different programs before enrolling. Attendees were likely to recommend their program and senior leadership were an important referral source. Programs tailored to specific functions were very appealing. The survey included over 500 respondents who were senior professionals across a variety of industries. Most learned about programs through word-of-mouth and valued how the program would benefit their organization over cost or time off work. The program helped build relationships, gain skills, and solve organizational challenges. Attendees would recommend their program to colleagues. A tailored program was the most appealing feature compared to cost, duration, or prestige.
Hugh Anderson presented on PR measurement and the need to move beyond traditional metrics like AVEs. He outlined a new framework using a three-tiered approach measuring program outputs, outcomes, and business outcomes. New metrics could include social media engagement, website traffic and conversions. Tools like Google Analytics, Inkybee and research from organizations like the Coalition for PR Research Standards were highlighted to help practitioners more effectively measure PR impact.
Based on the flowcharts, how would you respond as the organization in each situation?
For Subway: This would likely be classified as an accidental crisis with low damage and no victims. An appropriate response would be clarification - acknowledge the size issue and commit to addressing it.
For Children's Hospital: This involves victims (the family) and likely high damage due to the serious medical outcome. An appropriate initial response would be mortification - express regret/apology for the outcome and commit to investigating how it occurred to prevent future occurrences.
There are several different models and metrics used to evaluate PR campaigns, Napier take you through several to ensure you are evaluating your campaigns effectively.
Best Practices & New Ideas in PR MeasurementTim Marklein
PRSA St. Louis presentation on "Best Practices & New Ideas in PR Measurement" by Tim Marklein, executive VP of measurement and strategy for Weber Shandwick
Purpose: To advance public relations measurement by recommending metrics and approaches for evaluating public relations’ influence on four main business outcomes:
o Financial
o Reputation / Brand Equity
o Employees and other Internal Publics
o Public Policy
This document discusses communications measurement and provides guidance on whether to conduct measurement internally or hire external professionals. It covers what measurement is, why it's important, where it can be applied, and how to get leadership buy-in. Key points include that measurement shows what works well or not in communications programs, knowledge is important to avoid unintended consequences, and measurement demonstrates value and alignment with organizational objectives. The document also provides tips on conducting simple do-it-yourself measures versus hiring experts for more complex projects, and emphasizes having a clear goal and applying results.
The document outlines a 7-step checklist for effective internal communications: 1) understand your organization's communications strategy, 2) understand the power of different communication channels, 3) understand your audience, 4) craft targeted communications, 5) test and optimize messages, 6) continuously measure results, and 7) share results with senior stakeholders. Following this systematic approach can transform internal communications into a strategic tool that improves organizational productivity and influence.
The document discusses the role of quality health journalism in supporting social and behavior change efforts. It notes that good journalism can create an enabling environment for SBCC success, while misinformation from poor journalism can undermine SBCC interventions. The resource aims to explain how the news media can contribute to SBCC initiatives by providing objective information, space for differing perspectives, and helping audiences consider issues critically based on evidence.
Creating & Using Your Communications Plan: a workshop for the MetroWest Nonpr...NikiLamb
Presenter:
Marketing consultant and non-profit specialist
Niki Lamberg
www.nlamberg.com
Is your non-profit striving to grow? A communications plan gives you a framework for reaching your most important audiences more efficiently. With a basic, thoughtful plan in place, you can budget, benchmark, and breathe more easily. Whatever your budget--even if it's practically zero--you can take charge of your communications strategy.
Presented February 4, 2011 in Framingham, MA for the MetroWest Nonprofit Network
This document discusses different types of assessments including needs assessments, outcome evaluations, and process evaluations. It defines needs assessments as determining the gap between the current state and desired state. Outcome evaluations assess the effectiveness of a program in creating change, focusing on how much difference the program made. Process evaluations document how a program was implemented and help understand how outcomes were achieved. Process evaluations are important for understanding how impact was achieved and enabling replication of effective programs.
A communication audit is a systematic evaluation of an organization's internal and external communication efforts, including marketing materials, websites, reports, and more. It assesses the effectiveness of these channels and identifies strengths and weaknesses. An audit collects feedback from employees, customers, and other stakeholders through surveys, interviews, or focus groups. It then provides a comprehensive report on what is working well and what needs improvement, along with recommendations to strengthen future communication strategies.
The document discusses effective communication strategies for communicating a new total rewards package to employees. It outlines a methodology with 7 steps: 1) analyze the current situation; 2) define communication objectives; 3) establish key messages; 4) conduct audience research; 5) choose communication media; 6) implement the communication strategy; and 7) evaluate the communication. It then provides an example application of this methodology to communicate a new incentive compensation plan that represents significant cultural change.
Utilizing Customer Feedback to Identify Areas for Service Improvement and Inn...Tiklacars
Allied Consultants are the architects of the digital realm. Our IT consulting services lay the foundation for your digital empire. With web development, we design and construct online worlds that captivate your audience. Our Business Intelligence expertise is the blueprint for data-driven decisions, sculpting the path to success. Mobile App development is our art, creating interactive masterpieces that leave users spellbound. Application integration is our engineering prowess, seamlessly connecting the digital dots. Let us be your digital architects, crafting a digital landscape where your business thrives.
The document discusses how to properly measure the return on investment (ROI) of social media marketing efforts. It recommends identifying clear objectives and metrics upfront, such as key business outcomes, current measurement parameters, stakeholders, and the potential impact of social media conversations. Specific, measurable, actionable, realistic, and timed (SMART) goals should be set. Potential metrics include audience reach and engagement, sentiment, traffic and leads generated, and quality and speed of responses. Both external metrics like these as well as internal metrics around employee engagement should be measured to fully understand the ROI of social media activities.
A brief presentation on the "Evaluation" step of the four-step public relations planning process, with examples of how communicators can set measurable goals and objectives and then measure their success.
Evaluation and measurement of brand messagesSANAL C.WILSON
The document discusses evaluation and measurement of brand messages. It provides guidelines on setting measurable objectives to quantify marketing effectiveness. Companies should conduct gap analyses to determine what customers expect versus experience. Evaluation should consider cost/value factors like risk, success probability and ROI. Baselines need establishing for awareness, usage etc. Evaluation methods include concept testing, copy testing, media monitoring, and testing concepts, creative strategies and copy. Objectives, awareness, knowledge, attitudes, behaviors and customer metrics should be measured. Benefits of evaluation include reducing risks and enriching planning, while limitations include costs, time requirements and potential reduced creativity.
Lecture 4 quality performance measurement tools and techniquesTantish QS, UTM
This document discusses quality performance measurement techniques. It defines performance measurement and explains that it is an important part of Total Quality Management programs. Performance measures help managers know when and where to implement changes by providing appropriate information. The document outlines some challenges with traditional performance measurement systems and recommends developing new measures that align with TQM principles like customer focus, continuous improvement, and cross-functional teamwork. It also discusses characteristics of effective performance measurement systems and categories of performance measures. Overall, the document emphasizes that performance measurement provides valuable information for understanding processes, making decisions, and driving improvements.
CIPR Inside measurement summit - 23 July 2013CIPR Inside
Our second measurement summit took place on 23 July 2013. A lively and interesting discussion and presentations on how to measure internal communication and employee engagement
The document outlines Sense-IT Media's iStrategy Framework approach for developing a social media engagement strategy. The framework involves evaluating the social media landscape, agreeing on an engagement model, identifying key performance indicators, conducting an internal audit of current social media use, evaluating readiness to engage in social media, developing a social media strategy and action plans, and addressing organizational, resource and people issues.
This document discusses strategies for effectively engaging employees through communication of an organization's employee value proposition (EVP). It emphasizes that leading companies build employee loyalty similar to how brands build customer loyalty. Real-time measurement of employee sentiment, satisfaction, and engagement is important for managing risk, making fact-based decisions, and retaining talent. Developing an EVP framework that is aligned with the organization's brand and values, communicating it consistently through various channels, and measuring engagement can improve revenue, competitiveness, and attract top talent.
Our research report delivers the results of our 9th annual research on call quality programs. The Ascent Group conducted research during the 2nd quarter of 2010 to better understand how companies are monitoring call quality and other customer transactions. We asked companies to share their call monitoring experiences to help us identify the practices that make or break a quality monitoring process. We also asked them to provide their plans moving forward as well as lessons learned along the way.
Detailed case studies featuring companies examine current monitoring practices, lessons learned, challenges overcome, plans for the future, and business practices that have led to "big wins".
1. Why, When and How?
When Should We Measure Communications?
Yearly in depth surveys. Satisfaction and engagement surveys are generally carried out annually and
will carry added questions to supply some insights into the effectiveness.
Prior to your specific communications campaign. In order to best comprehend the effect of
communications, it is crucial to quantify (awareness, attitudes, knowledge etc) before a campaign.
Following campaign or an important communication. It's important to gauge the effectiveness and
impact of significant communications systems and initiatives. This enables you to tailor
communications that are internal to make sure they're powerful and delivering quantifiable business
value.
At periods to track approaches. Regular measurement helps communicators to estimate the ever
transferring feelings and approaches inside an organization also to tailor messages to make sure
they are appropriate to their audiences.
Beat checks and to collect feedback on issues that are particular also temperature checks during
and after particular events provide an insight into the dilemmas http://www.lane4performance.com/
and challenges.
At intervals against KPI's to course and benchmark. Measuring regularly against mark and
monitoring trends over time provide an early warning of problems that may go undetected until
they've escalated farther.
What to Measure?
Determining which aspects of communicating to measure will be based on communication objectives
and the organization's particular company. Several examples of communications measurements that
are helpful comprise:
Baseline communicating measurements prior to communicating can quantify; existing knowledge,
attitudes and behaviours of workers, in addition to discovering the existing information accessible,
how simple it's to find, the current communications stations available also to identify other factors
influencing behaviors and attitudes.
Communicating measurements that are functional
Following effort or a communication, functional features of communicating needs to be measured.
Comparisons to the baselines measurements are useful. Additional measures can include; kinds and
the number of messages sent, time of messages, message cut-through / reach, station effectiveness
and allure, crowd satisfaction with content (kinds, volume etc).
What to Quantify - Measuring Impact
Measuring of the impact communicating is a vital measure and measures can contain:
Audience perception measurements including variables for example; kinds and % of messages
2. received, communications remembered. Were messages viewed as consistent, related and credible?
Were the messages comprehended? How well do workers feel they are being supported? Do
employees understand just what needs to happen as an outcome of the communication(s)?
Change in Behavior
Most inner communication's aim would be to modify the attitudes and behaviours of workers. Thus,
it is valuable to identify and quantify variables such as; What changed? What's now different?
Impact on company goals / Results
Communicating measurement should enable Internal Communicators to quantify the effect of
communications on business objectives. For example:
The quantity of employees who signed up for share scheme (following its promotion)
The shift in approaches affecting customer service and the proposed effect of increased customer
retention
The number of usable ideas submitted via an employee proposition initiative (and the financial worth
of those ideas)
Isolating the effect of communicating
Communication will not really happen in a vacuum and it can sometimes be hard to isolate the
impact of communication versus other variables (incentive schemes, new product starts, factors
external to the business and so forth). Potential options comprise:
Communications control groups (not communicating them about a particular initiative or target, and
isolating a group, like one place that is remote, then looking at their activities and groups you and
have communicated differ)
Assessing the change in behaviour with regard to a company aim that was conveyed nicely, versus a
business goal with little or no communicating
Estimate the % influence of communications versus other factors that are affecting.
Calculating the financial value of communication
Calculations of the fiscal value of communicating will, at best, be approximations. Nevertheless, it's
still a significant part communicating measurement as it may attest the tremendous worth of
successful internal communication and begins a conversation with senior managers as well.
Think about the impact of a crisis communication response that is internal that is effective. A
comparison could be manufactured against a scenario (internally or inside a similar organization)
which wasn't handled and quantifiable worth attributed to factors such as:
Quantity of customers retained
Retention of good staff who might have left
3. Tools to Assist the Measurement of Internal Communicating contain:
Desktop Computer quizzes and surveys. Aside from in depth online or paper based surveys, pop-up
desktop computer surveys and quizzes can offer benchmarking capacity and added measurement
through the year.
Motivators. Staff can be encouraged by a prize incentive to participate in a quiz or survey.
Qualitative Communication Measurement
Along with quantitative measures of communications effectiveness, qualitative communication
measurement should also be undertaken. Qualitative techniques can comprise:
Free form replies in surveys.
Focus groups
Discussion forums. Although face to face interviews and focus groups in many cases are the best
choice for qualitative communication measurement, inner social media can be substitute or a helpful
addition. Set employee discussion forums up to investigate particular problems. Monitor remarks
made in discussion forums to collect qualitative measures of how employees are thinking feeling and
behaving
Preventing Survey Bias
Preventing non- self select prejudice or response. When surveys rely on workers to choose in or 'self
select', you may largely hear from the squeaky wheels or folks having an agenda motivating them to
participate. A desktop computer survey tool provides escalation, random sampling and recurrence
options to help ensure that representative internal communications measurement data is collected
from throughout the business.
Control groups. Set up a control groups for communications efforts. Identify survey responses from
control groups and hence to compare and measure the effect of internal communications efforts.
Multiple select questions. For many kinds of questions, e.g. "Where did you hear about XXX from?"
or "What factors affected your choice" supplying single response choices can skew results. In such
cases, supply multi-select answer choices.
Comparisons. Measure the impact of communications on folks who saw a special communications
against those who didn't.
4. Time's impact . Remember rates will drop over time, hence if communication campaigns must be
compared with one another, communications measurement has to be carried out at precisely the
same time interval after each and every campaign. Ensure that communications measurement is
performed after every effort at a regular time.
Supplying context to get a quiz or survey. Circumstance must be given to get a quiz or survey. For
example, a merchandise knowledge quiz without circumstance may cause workers maybe work more
difficult to ensure they supply the right responses and to be worried about the objective of the quiz.
Supporting Survey Participation
Encouraging the survey to support engagement. Important and the more mathematically precise the
results will probably be the higher survey contribution rates really are. Use innovative internal
communications channels like; desktop alerts, scrolling background feeds, screensaver messaging
and user generated staff magazines support participation and to increase the profile.
Communicating survey findings and activities being taken. Employees are far more likely to
participate, when they believe the output signals from staff surveys will probably be constructively
used. Consequently, ensure that survey outcome along with the resulting activities being taken are
well communicated to staff. Articles, newsfeeds and screensaver messages in the staff magazines
are great ways get messages across without their becoming buried in email inboxes.