The document discusses the Trust in Digital Life (TDL) consortium, which aims to stimulate research and development of trustworthy information and communication technology (ICT) solutions. TDL has over 20 members from industry, academia, and government working to set a research agenda. The consortium's goals are to establish an inspiring and self-sustaining community to advance knowledge and collaborative projects, develop an innovative research agenda, enable public funding for related projects, and increase awareness through demonstrations. TDL will measure progress using key performance indicators like adoption rates of e-services and survey scores on consumer trust.

1. Research & Innovation
Community

2. Trust in Digital Life - Mission statement
TDL is a consortium of Industry, Academics and
Government entities working together to set a research
agenda for a Trustworthy ICT.
Why Trust for ICT?
To stimulate a broad adoption by citizens of e-services

3. TDL Members
Industrial and Service Sector
Microsoft
Nokia
Philips
Gemalto
Oberthur
Irdeto
NEC Europe
Nokia Siemens Networks
NXP
Thales
Knowledge Institutes
Fraunhofer Institute Fokus
Goethe University Frankfurt
Privacy International
University of Twente
University of Murcia
University of Luxembourg
Waterford Institute of Techonology
KU Leuven
Norwegian Consumer Council
Dutch Police – Cybercrime programme
TNO
University of the Aegean
More than 20
prospective members and observers !

4. TDL ambitions and expected performances
1. Self sustainable inspiring TRUST community providing
directions and development of knowledge and collaborative
projects & frameworks for trustworthy ICT solutions
2. Innovative but realistic research agenda recognized by
industry, knowledge institutes, the European commission,
local governments and other independent authorities
3. Create possibilities for public funding for collaborative R&D
and deployment projects
4. Create industrial, political and legal awareness for
removing barriers through an extensive demonstrations
and pilots program.

5. Key Performance Indicators
TDL is working on setting a Dash Board to measure Trust in
ICT
Such KPIs can be:
– Adoption rate (%age) of citizens using e-services
– Number of ICT trust-related incidents reported
– Number of new e-services launch
– Consumers/Citizens surveys score cards

6. Trust in Digital Life at a glance
• Gemalto, Microsoft, Nokia and Philips founded the Trust in Digital Life
research and innovation consortium (TDL) in 2009 to stimulate the
development of Trustworthy ICT solutions.
• 22 parties already joined the consortium and TDL is growing steadily.
• In 2012 the consortium will count more than 40 complementary members.
• TDL will set out a vision and strategic research agenda for trustworthy
products relating to ICT.
• TDL will provide recommendations for research for the European frame work
program (FP8).
• TDL is financially supported by the European commission.

7. Trustworthy ICT solutions
• Trust is an essential pre-requisite for connecting people in effective human
and enterprise transactions.
• Trust builds on elements like security, privacy, transparency, accountability
and reputation.
• There is no clear understanding on the sources of trustworthiness, nor is
there an industry recommendation on implementing principles to generate
trust in digital services.
• European strategy must aim at a strong competitive position in producing
innovative trustworthiness solutions accepted by citizens, business and
governments.
• Coordination effort goes across Member States, industrial and service sectors,
academia, public authorities and representatives of citizens.
• Essential is the recognition of the importance of the rule of law, security, and
privacy and other core democratic freedoms in contributing to
trustworthiness.

8. WG 1 use cases
WG 2 Technology & Requirements
WG 4 Business Cases
WG 3 Law & Technology
TDL Innovation lines
Scale out different application domains
Collaboration with projects and initiatives
Execution TDL SRA & Innovation funnel
Diverge Converge Consolidate Implement
2010 2011 2012 2020
RESULTS WG1 & WG2
DEMONSTRATORS
FIRST DRAFT SRA PILOTS
WHITE PAPERS RESEARCH PROJECTS
PRESS RELEASE
RESULTS WG3 & WG4
REFINED SRA
TDL INNOVATION FUNNEL
PROPOSALS CALL 8 FP7

9. End-2-End Trust Landscape
Data
Lifecycle Trusted
Management Service Stack
Integrity
Champions: Champions: Champions:
Gemalto & Philips Nokia & Thales Microsoft & NEC
Innovation funnels

10. Themes
Cloud
IoT Privacy Social
Mobile devices Impact
Data Lifecycle Management E-Health
Service Integrity Mobile Applications
Trusted Stack Online Services
E-Authentication
Deployment
Pilot validation
Concept
(fundamental) demonstrators
Research

11. Innovation lines
Trusted stack
1. building a “trusted stack,” with suitably strong authentication of
hardware, software, people, and data
2. improving the ability to audit events to provide accountability
3. grant people better control over their digital personas to
enhance privacy.
This trusted stack, combined with better mechanisms to protect
privacy, will enable End to End (E2E) Trust
Data Life Cycle Management
1. a broad set of technologies from secure authentication, access
control, secure storage, revisions management, data archiving
and data termination
2. port into the Digital world all the key attributes of assets in the
physical world that people like and build their trust upon.
Protecting Identities, protecting assets and protection transactions
are the three pillars of a trustworthy eco-system

12. T r u s t F r a m e w o r k P r o v i d e r
Attribute Providers User Identity Service Providers
Agent Provider (Relying Parties)
IP
User Identity
Agent
AP
AP
4. Obtain
token(s)
Commercial Government Cloud Services Consumer Sites
Attribute Providers Attribute Providers
Service
IP 3. Evaluate IP AA
Policy 6. Retu
r n claim
Identity Providers
Identity Providers P
P set Government Portal
Client 2. Return Acce
ss Policy
1. Request for Access
e
ss t o web sit
8. Acce
5. User 7. Validate
consent token(s)
Commercial Government
Identity Providers Identity Providers
Computing Relying Party STS
Devices
Online
Physical Authentication Device Providers
World Identity
“Proofing”
Commercial Government
Service Service User

13. Working groups
Overview

14. Participating in working groups
• Four interdependent working group charters develop relevant content for the
strategic research agenda and project proposals:
1. Use cases
2. Technolgy & requirements
3. Law & technology
4. Business cases
• Face-to–face working group meetings are held every quarter and
teleconference meetings in between. Extensive interaction between working
groups is organised.
• Working groups produce papers and publications.
• Parties can join one or more working groups.
• Willingness to exchange knowledge and experience, sharing customer &
market insights, commitments for joint research and cross sector
development trajectories are key success factors.

15. Working group charter
Use cases

16. Use Cases for Trust in Digital Life
• Use cases will identify, group and describe the common characteristics of the
services the industry finds the most potential.
• Description of generic use cases and associated digital services will be
enriched with scenario’s “user stories”.
• Possible threats to a user’s information security and privacy will be derived
from user stories and will be offered to Requirements and Technology
Working Group for further analysing and defining a threat landscape.
• Current use cases:
– Cloud Computing
– Online Gaming
– Online Auction Fraud
– Child Online safety
– E-Healthcare
– E-Nergy
• Deliverables:
White papers on several use cases and user stories

17. Working group charter
Requirements & Technology

18. Roadmap of Trust
• Technology and requirements WG addresses questions that relates to
(unsatisfied) elements of trust and their requirements.
• The role of technology and potential technical disruptive solutions for
unsatisfied elements of trust are investigated and research areas are
recommended.
• A generic architecture and frameworks will be developed to support industry
and government with guidelines and de facto standards for research and
product development.
• The approach is to analyse use cases, develop a threat landscape and create
an overview of state-of-the art technology technology that support
trustworthy products.
• A technology roadmap covering the requirements is a key delivery.
• Deliverables:
Elements of trust
Technical requirement for trust
Roadmap of trust and authentication architecture

19. Technical challenges (WG2)
Derived Threats
• Not respecting co-ownership of data
• Location threats
• Unwanted retention of data
• Copying of Information without consent
• Authentication
• User interaction through a compromised end-user device

20. Technical challenges (WG2)
Research Questions
Trusted computing platforms
• Q1: How to protect end-user devices, networks and servers from
malware?
• Q2: How to make the trustworthiness of an end-user device
transparent to the user?
Trusted Identity
• Q3: How can users better protect their credentials, achieving a balance
between security, privacy, mobility, costs and user experience?
• Q4: How can we increase user’s privacy by assuring users are
unlinkable by default when presenting credentials to applications?
Trusted Information
• Q5: How to ensure the privacy of information?
Trusted attributes
• Q6: How to disclose only attributes that are necessary for an
application?
• Q7: How to prove attributes?

21. Working group charter
Law & Technology

22. Democratic structures & European values are
prerequisites
• How can law and policy spur design of technology that:
– enables democratic structures and
– honors European values such as privacy, freedom of expression, protection of
minorities, freedom of association, and freedom of belief.
• Law and Technology WG will ask if accountability, transparency, and open
competition are adequate for ensuring that ICT products do not oppose
democratic structures and values and in fact promote them.
• The exploration will delve into such topics as:
– Accountability – third party beneficiaries in contracts; audits; ombudsmen;
procedural due process; etc.
– Transparency – average people knowing what law applies; objective and visible
certification criteria; existence of contractual relationships and their terms; visibility
into parties’ practices; market driven education campaigns; etc.
– Open Competition – market structure concerns of concentration, product
differentiation, ease of entry; trade-offs with open or closed systems;
interoperability; etc.
• Deliverables:
Whitepaper on legal prerequisites for trustworthy ICT solutions

23. Working group charter
Business cases

24. Value driven research
• The impact of trustworthy ICT solutions
– How can we measure the economic and societal impact
– what are the business models that motivates the required research
investments.
• Business cases WG will develop business models and a portfolio of research
project ideas for the development of Trustworthy ICT with scenario’s and
sensitivity analyses to understand the economic and societal impact.
• They approach is to identify market segments, market drivers and high level
project description based on output of WG Technology & requirements. The
expected value of research efforts is motivated.
• Deliverables:
Models for TDL business logic, addressable markets and technology
roadmaps
Portfolio of TDL research project ideas
Motivation of expected quantitative value of TDL research

25. TDL Governance
www.trustindigitallife.eu

26. Development TDL community

27. Governance TDL Consortium
Experts from industry, Permanent seats for founding partners:
government and Gemalto; Microsoft; Nokia and Philips
knowledge institutes Elections at the general assembly
Selection of 30 members
Elections at the general assembly
TDL Ambassadors anchoring Bicore: Secretary & membership mgt
TDL in European research Editing vision and SRA
community
Use Cases
WG Leader: University of Luxembourg
Requirements and Technology
WG Leader: Philips
Law & Technology
WG Leader: Nokia
Business Cases
WG Leader: Bicore

28. TDL Membership
www.trustindigitallife.eu

29. Membership profile

30. TDL membership objectives
• A multidisciplinary open research community
• Broad support to the research roadmaps
• Active participation in the Working Group charters
• Development & implementation of the SRA & Work plan
• Development of a balanced research project portfolio
• International recognition of TDL
30

31. 5 reasons to join the TDL community
1. Influence the European state-of-the-art vision on Trust in Digital Life.
2. Share and enrich your knowledge and insights on law, markets and
technology with complementary leading edge industry parties, knowledge
institutes and policy makers.
3. Create promising opportunities for public-private research projects in
European frame work programs.
4. Inside out: Identify yourselves with high quality content and papers.
5. Outside in: Validate and improve your (business) strategy.
TDL is an open community stimulating cross sector collaboration to enable
development of trustworthy solutions

32. 5 reasons to become a TDL member
1. Actively contribute to the strategic research agenda, access to all information.
2. Support continuation of the TDL partnership after project period in 2012.
3. Receive funds for the development of demonstrators on trustworthy ICT
solutions and execution of detailed expert studies on Law, Market and
Technology.
4. Become member of management board.
5. Develop concrete public – private projects within frame work programs.
TDL membership will create
vast business opportunities and leverage your activities

33. How to become a member
• Your application should include a written statement indicating your relevant
expertise and a description of the your envisioned contribution to the effort.
• Approving and signing the Consortium Agreement and Policies and
Procedures
• Receiving 2 sponsorship letters from current Executive Board members
• To become a Working Group or Management Board Member, you must submit
an application. Declarations of accession to the Management Board and the Working
Groups are included in the Consortium Agreement.
• Possibility to apply for an observer status. In this case you don’t benefit the
additional advantages of TDL membership status
• For more information, please visit the website at www.trustindigitallife.eu or contact
the TDL Office at TDLOffice@bicore.nl

34. TDL Membership fee
• The yearly fee for TDL membership:
– € 10.000 for Industry and enabling members
– € 5.000 for knowledge institutes
• Reduction on fees for first two years
Year Industry and enabling members Knowledge Institutes
2010 € 5.000,- € 0,-
2011 € 7.500,- € 2.500,-
2012 € 10.000,- € 5.000,-
Use of membership fees:
• The working groups can apply for budget for demonstrators and studies.
• The executive board approves the yearly budget and applications.

35. Frequently Asked Questions
Who are the founders of TDL?
Gemalto, Microsoft, Nokia and Philips took the initiative for TDL and signed a consortium agreement in
2009.
Can I participate in TDL without becoming a member?
This is possible as long as the European commission financially support TDL and you must be prepared
to exchange relevant knowledge. You must apply for an observer role and accept the policies and
procedures.
Can I use all information of TDL without limitation ?
All parties that participate in TDL have to accept the rules for using information. The principle is that
parties are free to use the information that is shared between parties.
What type of parties are member of TDL?
Members of TDL are ICT industry parties; knowledge institutes; trade associations; law firms.
Are the results of TDL becoming public?
TDL has a procedure for publishing results. The vision and Strategic Research Agenda will be made
public
Who should I contact to become a member?
TDLoffice@bicore.nl
More frequently asked questions can be found on the website
www.trustindigitallife.eu

36. www.trustindigitallife.eu