This document criticizes Tarak Barkawi's book for inaccurately portraying the class composition of the British Indian Army during World War I. It provides evidence that there were 30 infantry battalions organized along single ethnic or religious lines during WWI, contrary to Barkawi's claims. It also notes several important aspects of British Indian military history that Barkawi failed to address, such as the influence of the 1857 mutiny on reorganization, acts of defiance by Indian officers, and the impact of casualties and mutinies on changes to the army's composition. The critic concludes that while the book provides anecdotes, it cannot be considered a serious military history work due to factual inaccuracies and omissions.
HOW SHOCKINGLY WRONG CAN SO CALLED BRILLIANT HISTORIANS GET ?
April 2021
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24325.47847
Project: Researchers Academy Excellence磊磊
Agha H AminAgha H Amin
reflections on British Indian Army recruitment as discussed by family eldersAgha A
reflections on British Indian Army recruitment as discussed by family elders
July 2020
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21931.26408
Project: MILITARY HISTORY
Agha H Amin
Hi everyone. I have made this presentation for my college assignment as well as for a quick revision purpose. I researched from various books and sites, and here I am. Thanks for watching :)
HOW SHOCKINGLY WRONG CAN SO CALLED BRILLIANT HISTORIANS GET ?
April 2021
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24325.47847
Project: Researchers Academy Excellence磊磊
Agha H AminAgha H Amin
reflections on British Indian Army recruitment as discussed by family eldersAgha A
reflections on British Indian Army recruitment as discussed by family elders
July 2020
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21931.26408
Project: MILITARY HISTORY
Agha H Amin
Hi everyone. I have made this presentation for my college assignment as well as for a quick revision purpose. I researched from various books and sites, and here I am. Thanks for watching :)
sepoy perceptions about military effectiveness of english east india companyAgha A
Sepoy Perceptions about EEIC Military Effectiveness
The Bengal Army was the brain child of Lord Clive's military genius. The Bengal sepoys related to each other by blood relationship and caste bonds had served the EEIC for some 100 years when they rebelled in 1857. These men had a very close contact with the British and had observed them from very close quarters. Any neutral and unbiased account of the events of 1857 clearly proves that the Britisher as an officer was never disliked by the sepoys. As an officer who served in Pakistan Army I can state with conviction that the British provided excellent leadership to the Indians. They definitely knew how to lead and inspire the Indian, leading them from the forefront which I am afraid few of at least our native post 1947. Generals did either in Burma or in 1965 or in 1971. The sepoy admired and revered the British officer. In 1857 he was rebelling against the system instituted by the EEIC. Against policies formulated by men constituting a board of directors in far off England. The greasing of cartridges with pig or cow fat similarly was also an administrative decision. The sepoy perceived the British officer as a fair and brave leader and many British officers reciprocated these feelings. One of the British commanding officer committed suicide when his native infantry regiment was disbanded. Many others resisted disbandment of their units. One troop of 3rd Light Cavalry the most crucial unit of Bengal Army Sepoys as a matter of fact loyally fought for the British in 1857.
Myths and misconceptions of indo pak history part 8Agha A
Yet in 1857 the Indians or at least a part of them both Hindus and Muslims combined and made one very desperate yet valiant effort to oust the British. Till this time the Hindus acknowledged the Muslim political supremacy since we see the Bengal Army which was predominantly Hindu, fighting for Muslim sovereigns at Delhi and in Oudh!
But when this great rebellion failed there was the parting of the ways! The Muslims of the post-1857 had no choice but to please the British to avoid Hindu domination!
The Hindu’s problems had completely ended!
All they had to do was to play a waiting game.
They knew that one day the British will have to go and then they, the ones who had been ruled and subjugated by a minority from the 12th century till almost the 18th century would dominate the Indo-Pak sub- continent, just like they were about to do around 1799 and till 1803 when the EEIC challenged the Hindu Mahratta rule!
The Muslim post-1857 problems were more complex, they had to escape Hindu domination and they also had to face the British.
The policy they adopted after 1857 was “Loyalty to the British”.
sepoy perceptions about military effectiveness of english east india companyAgha A
Sepoy Perceptions about EEIC Military Effectiveness
The Bengal Army was the brain child of Lord Clive's military genius. The Bengal sepoys related to each other by blood relationship and caste bonds had served the EEIC for some 100 years when they rebelled in 1857. These men had a very close contact with the British and had observed them from very close quarters. Any neutral and unbiased account of the events of 1857 clearly proves that the Britisher as an officer was never disliked by the sepoys. As an officer who served in Pakistan Army I can state with conviction that the British provided excellent leadership to the Indians. They definitely knew how to lead and inspire the Indian, leading them from the forefront which I am afraid few of at least our native post 1947. Generals did either in Burma or in 1965 or in 1971. The sepoy admired and revered the British officer. In 1857 he was rebelling against the system instituted by the EEIC. Against policies formulated by men constituting a board of directors in far off England. The greasing of cartridges with pig or cow fat similarly was also an administrative decision. The sepoy perceived the British officer as a fair and brave leader and many British officers reciprocated these feelings. One of the British commanding officer committed suicide when his native infantry regiment was disbanded. Many others resisted disbandment of their units. One troop of 3rd Light Cavalry the most crucial unit of Bengal Army Sepoys as a matter of fact loyally fought for the British in 1857.
Myths and misconceptions of indo pak history part 8Agha A
Yet in 1857 the Indians or at least a part of them both Hindus and Muslims combined and made one very desperate yet valiant effort to oust the British. Till this time the Hindus acknowledged the Muslim political supremacy since we see the Bengal Army which was predominantly Hindu, fighting for Muslim sovereigns at Delhi and in Oudh!
But when this great rebellion failed there was the parting of the ways! The Muslims of the post-1857 had no choice but to please the British to avoid Hindu domination!
The Hindu’s problems had completely ended!
All they had to do was to play a waiting game.
They knew that one day the British will have to go and then they, the ones who had been ruled and subjugated by a minority from the 12th century till almost the 18th century would dominate the Indo-Pak sub- continent, just like they were about to do around 1799 and till 1803 when the EEIC challenged the Hindu Mahratta rule!
The Muslim post-1857 problems were more complex, they had to escape Hindu domination and they also had to face the British.
The policy they adopted after 1857 was “Loyalty to the British”.
Battle of Gangiri-Heavy Price paid by HM 6 Dragoon Guards for Gallantry Agha A
Battle of Gangiri-Heavy Price paid by HM 6 Dragoon Guards for Gallantry https://www.academia.edu/52632772/Battle_of_Gangiri_Heavy_Price_paid_by_HM_6_Dragoon_Guards_for_Gallantry via @academia
WHY PAKISTAN ARMY OR INDIAN ARMY CAN NEVER PRODUCE A MUSTAFA KAMAL- SOMETHING...Agha A
WHY PAKISTAN ARMY OR INDIAN ARMY CAN NEVER PRODUCE A MUSTAFA KAMAL- SOMETHING SERIOUSLY WRONG IN THE GENES
April 2020
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20723.27689
Project: MILITARY HISTORY
Agha H Amin
Explore our comprehensive data analysis project presentation on predicting product ad campaign performance. Learn how data-driven insights can optimize your marketing strategies and enhance campaign effectiveness. Perfect for professionals and students looking to understand the power of data analysis in advertising. for more details visit: https://bostoninstituteofanalytics.org/data-science-and-artificial-intelligence/
Chatty Kathy - UNC Bootcamp Final Project Presentation - Final Version - 5.23...John Andrews
SlideShare Description for "Chatty Kathy - UNC Bootcamp Final Project Presentation"
Title: Chatty Kathy: Enhancing Physical Activity Among Older Adults
Description:
Discover how Chatty Kathy, an innovative project developed at the UNC Bootcamp, aims to tackle the challenge of low physical activity among older adults. Our AI-driven solution uses peer interaction to boost and sustain exercise levels, significantly improving health outcomes. This presentation covers our problem statement, the rationale behind Chatty Kathy, synthetic data and persona creation, model performance metrics, a visual demonstration of the project, and potential future developments. Join us for an insightful Q&A session to explore the potential of this groundbreaking project.
Project Team: Jay Requarth, Jana Avery, John Andrews, Dr. Dick Davis II, Nee Buntoum, Nam Yeongjin & Mat Nicholas
Opendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptxOpendatabay
Opendatabay.com unlocks the power of data for everyone. Open Data Marketplace fosters a collaborative hub for data enthusiasts to explore, share, and contribute to a vast collection of datasets.
First ever open hub for data enthusiasts to collaborate and innovate. A platform to explore, share, and contribute to a vast collection of datasets. Through robust quality control and innovative technologies like blockchain verification, opendatabay ensures the authenticity and reliability of datasets, empowering users to make data-driven decisions with confidence. Leverage cutting-edge AI technologies to enhance the data exploration, analysis, and discovery experience.
From intelligent search and recommendations to automated data productisation and quotation, Opendatabay AI-driven features streamline the data workflow. Finding the data you need shouldn't be a complex. Opendatabay simplifies the data acquisition process with an intuitive interface and robust search tools. Effortlessly explore, discover, and access the data you need, allowing you to focus on extracting valuable insights. Opendatabay breaks new ground with a dedicated, AI-generated, synthetic datasets.
Leverage these privacy-preserving datasets for training and testing AI models without compromising sensitive information. Opendatabay prioritizes transparency by providing detailed metadata, provenance information, and usage guidelines for each dataset, ensuring users have a comprehensive understanding of the data they're working with. By leveraging a powerful combination of distributed ledger technology and rigorous third-party audits Opendatabay ensures the authenticity and reliability of every dataset. Security is at the core of Opendatabay. Marketplace implements stringent security measures, including encryption, access controls, and regular vulnerability assessments, to safeguard your data and protect your privacy.
Tarak Barkawis soldiers of empire reviewed-Part two
1. This is second part of critical book review of above
mentioned book by Mr Tarak Barkawi.
Mr Barkawi is addicted to making vague and general
statememts and hoodwinks being specific which requires
relatively much greater command over the subject.
Thus he hoodwinks the Indian Armys class composition in
two world wars which where Indian Armys class
composition and organisation had vastly changed:-- (PAGE-
23 of Tarak Barkawis book)
2. Now Barkawis claim that by the time of the world wars is
historically in bad order and ignores Indian Armys actual
composition in 1914 and its far altered composition after
1922 or from 1922.
There were 30 infantry battalions organised as single
religion or single ethnic group battalions during WW 1
,OTHER THAN GURKHAS !
These are listed below.So Barkawis assertion is factually
incorrect as far as Indian Armys actual class composition is
concerned in First World war .
3. The situation altered radically after 1922 and single class
units were significantly reduced but Dogras
,Garhwalis,Mahrattas were wholly trusted as single class unit
and some Sikhs were also trusted and their single class
structured retained , even in second world war.
INFANTRY UNITS ORGANISED ON SINGLE
RELIGIOUS GROUP OR SINGLE ETHNIC GROUP
IN WW 1 and WW 2 are shown as below:--
Serial
No
Unit Ethnicity or Class
WW 1
Ethnicity or Class
WW 2
1 1st
Brahmans
100 % UP
Brahmans
ALTERED TO
MIXED in 1922
4. and unit
disbanded in 1931
2 2nd
Rajputs 100 % UP Hindu
Rajputs
ALTERED TO
MIXED in 1922
and unit
disbanded in 1931
3 3rd
Brahmans
100 % UP
Brahmans
DISBANDED IN
1922
4 4th
Rajputs 100 % Hindu
Rajput
ALTERED TO
MIXED in 1922 .
5 5th
Light
Infantry
100 % Hindustani
Muslim and
Ranghar
Disbanded 1922
5. 6 6th
Jat 100 % non
Punjabi Hindu Jat
ALTERED TO
MIXED in 1922 .
7 7th
Rajput 100 % Hindu
Rajput
ALTERED TO
MIXED in 1922 .
8 8th
Rajput 100 % Hindu
Rajput
ALTERED TO
MIXED in 1922 .
9 10th
Jats 100 % non
Punjabi Hindu Jat
ALTERED TO
MIXED in 1922 .
10 11th
Rajputs
100 % Hindu
Rajputs
ALTERED TO
MIXED in 1922 .
11 13th
Rajputs
100 % Rajputana
Hindu Rajputs
ALTERED TO
MIXED in 1922 .
12 14th
Sikhs 100 % Sikh 100 % Sikh
13 15th
Sikhs 100 % Sikh 100 % Sikh
6. 14 16th
Rajputs
100 % Hindu
Rajput
ALTERED TO
MIXED in 1922 .
15 17th
Infantry
100 % Hindustani
Muslim
Disbanded 1921
16 18th
Infantry
100 % Hindustani
Muslim
ALTERED TO
MIXED in 1922 .
17 23rd
Sikh
Pioneers
100 % Sikh Disbanded 1932
18 34th
Sikh
Pioneers
100 % Sikh Disbanded 1932
19 35th
Punjabis
100 % Sikh ALTERED TO
MIXED in 1922 .
20 36th
Punjabis
100 % Sikh ALTERED TO
MIXED in 1922 .
7. 21 37th
Dogras 100 % Hindu
Dogra
ALTERED TO
MIXED IN 1922
BUT REVERTED
TO 100 %
DOGRA ABOUT
1935
22 38th
Dogras 100 % Hindu
Dogra
ALTERED TO
MIXED IN 1922
BUT REVERTED
TO 100 %
DOGRA ABOUT
1935
23 39th
Garhwal
100 % Garhwali
Hindu
100 % Garhwali
Hindu
8. 24 2/39
Garhwal
100 % Garhwali
Hindu
100 % Garhwali
Hindu
25 3/39
Garhwal
100 % Garhwali
Hindu
100 % Garhwali
Hindu
26 4/39
Garhwal
100 % Garhwali
Hindu
100 % Garhwali
Hindu
27 2/41st
Dogras
100 % Dogra and
raised in 1917-18
ALTERED TO
MIXED IN 1922
BUT REVERTED
TO 100 %
DOGRA ABOUT
1935
28 45th
Sikhs 100 % Sikh 100 % Sikh
9. 29 47th
Sikhs 100 % Sikh ALTERED TO
MIXED in 1922 .
30 50th
Kumaon
100 % Hindu
Kumaon Rajputs
100 % Hindu
Kumaon Rajputs
31 103
Mahratta
Light
Infantry
Mixed unit All Mahratta
Hindu unit after
about 1930
32 105
Mahratta
Light
Infantry
Mixed unit All Mahratta
Hindu unit after
about 1930
33 106 Hazara
Pioneers
100 % Hazaras Disbanded 1932
10. 34 110
Mahratta
Light
Infantry
Mixed All Mahratta
Hindu unit after
about 1930
35 114
Mahratta
Light
Infantry
Mixed All Mahratta
Hindu unit after
about 1930
36 116
Mahratta
Light
Infantry
Mixed All Mahratta
Hindu unit after
about 1930
11. 37 117
Mahratta
Light
Infantry
Mixed All Mahratta
Hindu unit after
about 1930
38 2/124
Baluchistan
Infantry
100 % Muslim Mixed from about
1927
39 127 QMO
Baluch
Light
Infantry
100 % Muslim Mixed
composition from
about 1927
40 129 DCO
Baluchis
100 % Muslim Mixed
composition from
about 1927
12. 41 130 KGO
Baluchis
100 % Muslim Mixed
composition from
about 1927
IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF BRITISH INDIAN
MILITARY HISTORY THAT TARAK BARKAWI
MISSED
1. Tarak Barkawis bibliography misses the most influential
pamphlet on reorganizing British Indian Army that had
great influence on the post 1857
reorganisation.”CAUSES OF INDIAN MUTINY” ,
by Sir Syed Ahmad Khan.
2. Tarak did not read books like Nawabzada Sher Ali
Khans autobiography where he described how FM
Auchinleck actually rewarded Khan by bestowing on
13. him command of the FMs own unit when Sher Ali Khan
took a principled stand which was regarded as defiance
by his British seniors .
3. Tarak neglects WW 1 which was a far tougher and
bloody affair in terms of casualties suffered , while
second world war was a much smaller affair as far as
casualties suffered.
4. Tarak hoodwinks or perhaps is ignorant about the fact
that Sikh defiance of British in WW 1 led to the most
important change in Indian Army i.e reduction of Sikhs
in infantry from first position to third position and the
elevation of Punjabi Muslims from third to first
position.
14. 5. Barkawi has nothing to say about why no Sikh was
awarded a VC despite being in highest numbers in
infantry in WW 1.
6. Barkawi totally misses the most important event in
British Indian Army history after 1857, i.e the 23rd
Cavalry mutiny in 1915 that possibly led to British
decision to reduce Sikhs in infantry and raise Punjabi
Muslims to highest numbers in infantry.
7. The book has no index and the reader is blind and
clueless and at the mercy of Barkawis endless anecdotes
which are not good military history.
Tarkawi overrates the Indian political movements which
were by and large a convincing failure and did not lead
anywhere.
15. The book is rich in anecdotes and light reading but cannot
be taken as a serious military historical work.