This document discusses using virtual environments and educational humanism to help people with challenges like autism and brain injuries. It reviews research showing that combining technology and humanistic principles can effectively facilitate learning by meeting physiological, social, and cognitive needs. Virtual reality systems using headsets, software and computers can elicit real-life reactions and modify behaviors. However, some learners experience negative side effects from virtual reality that create barriers, but these can be addressed through alternative software approaches without headsets. Research barriers are reduced by the ability to duplicate virtual program scenarios and through using avatars to display emotions.

1. The Use of Virtual Environments with People with Challenges:
Educational Humanism in Practice
Linda Deneher
Peer Review: Susan Ferdon and Andrea Williams
Boise State University

2. Abstract
The practice of educational technology can be applied using a variety of concepts.
Educational humanism is chosen here to illustrate the use of technology with individuals
diagnosed with challenges, for example Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) and
Traumatic Brian Injuries (TBI). A survey of the literature regarding humanism in
education and in the use of technology with challenged learners was conducted and found
that the practice of combining educational technology with the humanistic standpoint is
effective in facilitating learning. Research into fulfilling the physiological and social
needs, as well as the cognitive needs of learners, is found to have positive impacts
including programs that can be used to create repeatable studies. Experiences delivered
through the use of virtual reality systems comprised of headsets, software, and computers
are found to elicit reactions similar to those in real life and can modify the learners'
behaviors. The implications of this conclusion include increased motivation for educators
using this type of technology with learners with challenges.
Introduction
Humanists in the field of education believed that the goal of education was to
advocate for and involve the entire being in the process of learning, regardless of the
challenges faced by individuals. Learners were valued and believed to have
physiological, cognitive, and social needs. These needs can be fulfilled through learner-
centric, technology-based learning environments allowing people to become self-
actualized.
The progress in the application of educational technology has been matched by
progress in humanist research designs using technology in virtual environments (VE) for
learners diagnosed with a wide variety of challenges. VE are generally comprised of
headsets, software, and computers that users interact with as though the information
provided is real. Learning theories underlying research in VE ranges from behaviorism to
humanism to social learning to more open designs such as case-based learning (Kolodner
& Guzdial, 2000). With the advent of VE with customizable avatars that move through a
three-dimensional landscape, researchers could study how people with challenges

3. functioned in programmable realities. (Parsons, Mitchell & Leonard, 2005).
Developments in programming resulted in a level of detail in human avatar faces that
made possible research in emotions (Moore, Cheng, McGrath & Powell, 2005). New
interface devices including head mounted displays have been used to immerse learners in
virtual environments that hypnotize participants (Austin, Abbot & Carbis, 2008). VE can
have multiple users who can collaborate in a real-time or scripted safe environments in
order to facilitate social skills (Parsons et al., 2005).
An obstacle to producing reputable research is the wide range of characteristics
and abilities of people with challenges. This can be partially overcome through the use of
VE due to the ease in which the programs and scenarios can be duplicated. (Rizzo,
Schultheis, Kerns &Mateer, 2004) Questions include whether or not information learned
from a VE can be applied to a similar real-life scenario. A distinct advantage to this mode
of delivery is that computers are naturally appealing and that helps provide motivation for
participants (Mineo, Zeigler, Gill &Salkin, 2009).
History of the Field of Educational Humanism
Humanism is defined by the Merriam - Webster Online Dictionary as, "a doctrine,
attitude, or way of life centered on human interests or values." Humanism existed in
Europe during the middle ages, and the goal of these humanist educators was to teach
skills necessary for speaking convincingly and writing persuasive letters, as opposed to
the sciences. In the early 1800s F. J.Niethammer used the term as a description of the
German school system’s curriculum. Controversy arose regarding the term with debate
between ecclesiastical organizations espousing religion, believing that the emphasis on

4. humans detracted from the focus on religion, and educators using the term to describe
learner - centered education.
Educational humanism became popular in the United States in the 1800s and
continues in use today with the recognition of the value of the humanness of the learners
and their attendant needs. This educational theory is based on the concept that the best
form of education is one that develops intellectual strengths, and that these strengths are
interrelated so that strengthening one will strengthen them all. The spirit of inclusion also
embraces all learners, including those with ASD and TBI . “Humanism in education has
meant greater emphasis on emotional health, on self-identity, on social relationships, and
a diminution of stress on formal study of the academic disciplines” (Broudy, 1973, p. 68).
Abraham Maslow recognized the significance of human needs, and how these
needs influence the ability of the learner is able to participate fully in educational
opportunities. The self-actualization stage that is the goal of humanist education is at the
top of Maslow's pyramid model of hierarchy of needs. Maslow recognized that before
students reached the stage where they were able to learn, they needed to satisfy
physiological and social needs. After satisfying needs found lower on the diagram,
achieving competence through facilitative humanist learning experiences and self-
actualization can occur.
Barriers to Virtual Learning and Their Solutions
With the increase in usage of virtual reality devices, it became apparent to
humanist educators that use of this type of device was causing a particular set of
unpleasant physiological side effects. The results of nine experiments designed to
measure these effects found negative physiological changes in learners including

5. “simulator (VE) sickness, postural instability, psycho motor control, perceptual
judgment, concentration, stress, and ergonomic effects (Cobb, Nichols, Ramsey and
Wilson, 1999 p. 169). Some of the effects were described to be “relatively minor and
short-lived,” but were considered to be “serious for 5% of participants and irritating for a
considerable percentage more” (Cobb et al., 1999 p. 169). This set of effects was
compared to another VR in industry at the time, flight simulators, and it was found to be
dissimilar to justify Cobb’s 1999 development of a new descriptive term: Virtual Reality
- Induced Symptoms and Effects (VRISE.) These negative effects from the use of virtual
reality devices creates a problematic humanist learning environment that must be
mitigated for those learners with VRISE.
In an article on case-based reasoning as a model for learning, Kolodner and
Guzdial (2000) describe one solution, the SmallTalk Apprenticeship-Based Learning
Environment (STABLE), a type of software that does not require the use of potentially
nauseating headsets. The apprenticeship learning model facilitates and scaffolds novice
users, a humanist educational goal, through learning facilitated by a master in the domain.
These methods are often referred to as scaffolding (Kolodner & Guzdial, 2000). The
‘master’ in this example is software with linked sections with access to three levels of
detail. Similarities to other studies include participants expressing their displeasure in the
program's inability to compare specific cases. They found that “what students see as
relevant is important to determine and may not always be evident. Several iterations of a
tool are needed to ensure that all the capabilities that need to be in it for productive use
are indeed included” (Kolodner & Guzdial, 2000, p. 233).

6. This type of ‘master’ software can be effective with learners with challenges
because the different levels of detail would allow use by students with a wide range of
disorders. Learners would be able to tailor their interaction with the program to whatever
is appropriate for them. Inappropriate lessons are a significant barrier to learning as well
as a source of frustration. The field of Educational Humanism is based on Pragmatist
philosophy, so facilitators teaching using this model will be comfortable with the notion
that flexibility and change are likely to be essential in the process of creating educational
design.
Barriers to Research in Virtual Learning and Their Solutions
Building on the importance of socially-based learning, collaborative virtual
environments (CVE) were used in a study to see if people with autism were able
“understand basic human emotions as represented by a animated humanoid avatar”
(Moore et al., 2005, p. 231). The CVEs have the ability to represent real-life social
interactions similar to those that are encountered in real life, but what may be
commonplace for many may be problematic for those with autism because of their
difficulties interpreting emotions. Through the use of avatars, it is possible to display an
emotional state by choosing “an appropriate facial expression” for themselves, and also
understand the emotional states of others by interpreting the expressions on their avatars.
If these learners had not been able to recognize facial expressions on avatars, it would
have invalidated studies using avatars. Since the results were positive, this potential
barrier to further research has been eliminated. More than 90% of the participants were
able to recognize four emotions, indicating that it may be possible for them to learn to
interact socially with fewer misunderstandings regarding emotional states. Parts of the

7. style in this study were behaviorist as there was a limited selection of answers and only
one in each case could be correct.
Reviews of literature regarding the use of “augmented and alternative
communication (AAC) and assistive technology as they have been used to support
communication and learning in individuals with autism” have been done (Mirenda, 2001,
p.141). Regarding computer-assisted instruction (CAI), Mirenda notes that in the 1970s
papers were published with “anecdotal reports of positive outcomes,” but there were few
rigorous studies being done at that time. The lack of credible, supporting research is a
barrier to further research in any field; however, it was found that learners participating in
the study demonstrated less problematic behavior and were more likely to comply with
instructions using CAI. An example utilizing synthesized speech was provided that shows
the use of CAI provides a clear benefit. Findings include “marked increases in their
spontaneous utterances in all of the ON conditions, compared to both baseline (no
computer) and all OFF conditions” (Mirenda, 2001, p. 147).
Cost is a barrier to research in the field of educational technology, but since
virtual reality programs and scenarios can be duplicated, “virtual environments
constructed for one purpose can also be applied for applications addressing other clinical
targets” (Rizzo et al., 2006, p. 35). Along with the ability to be reproduced, virtual
realities are beneficial to a variety of fields of research because they are less expensive
than physical models with features than may or may not reproducible in the real world.
The studied mentioned above describes how a virtual reality scenario that was designed
as a virtual classroom used to assess children with ADHD was modified for
“development of tests that address other cognitive functions, eye movement under

8. distraction conditions, social anxiety disorder, and the creation of an earthquake safety
training application for children with developmental and learning disabilities” (Rizzo et
al., 2006). This valid, repeatable, flexible, delivery method is itself a solution to
numerous barriers to learning.
Naturally attractive media may allow learners to be more easily taught, and Mineo
reports study participants enjoyed computer-based learning. Their research project
compared four different types of electronic screen media (ESM) using video showing
each participant, video of someone participants knew playing a VR game, an animated
video, and there was an opportunity for participants play the VR game themselves.
Findings show that there is a “preference for seeing themselves on the screen, as well as
reviewing the VR scenarios” (Mineo et al., 2009, p. 172).
Comfort levels of learners, an interest of the humanist educator, is raised by the
use of virtual environments. They have the ability to provide users with a secure zone for
the opportunity to learn intuitively, and experience learning in ways that are not possible
in the real environment. There are “advantages of VEs in providing people a safe place to
learn about and practice skills, behaviors and activities that they may need to do in the
real world” (Cobb, 2007 p. 13). In the aforementioned article, Cobb authored a review of
research in the subject of virtual reality learning environments dating from the 1990s, and
it was found in many cases that participants using VE improved their learning.
Virtual Learning Environments for People With Autism Spectrum Disorder
Austin’s description of autism states that it “is characterized by severe
impairments in socialization, communication and behavior. Children with autism may
display a range of problem behaviors such as hyperactivity, poor attention, impulsivity,

9. aggression, self injury and tantrums.” (Austin et al., 2008, p. 102). Parsons conducted
research using virtual environments and was one of the first studies to incorporate
learners with ASD; the inclusion of all learners is an educational humanist goal. These
virtual environments determined if participants with ASD observed social norms
regarding personal space, if they reacted differently than the control group, and to
compare experiences with virtual environments and tasks performed without this
technology. Participants were given two scenarios, a cafe and a path containing a
staggered series of flowerbeds. The findings of this study show that, “generally, members
of the ASD group were slightly less likely to behave according to social conventions, but
were not significantly different from the other groups” (Parsons, 2005, p. 105).
In another study, partially immersive virtual reality in combination with hypnosis
facilitated learners’ development. Although this study showed little effect on the
participants symptoms of autism, reports from the parents of the participants in the study
indicate “children with autism accept and enjoy the VRH procedure,” so the children
were interested in the process and paid attention (Austin, 2008, p. 107). Those who
become anxious when exposed to high levels of environmental stimuli may benefit from
using this type of partially immersive, low-stimulus augmented VE and progress in their
journey toward self-actualization.
People with autism spectrum disorders have deficits in their ability to play as a
result of their impaired executive functions causing an inability to participate in social
interaction and form emotional relationships. "Initial social difficulties prevent the
development of social interaction, with its role in eliciting and enriching spontaneous
play" (Jordan, 2003, p. 347). These deficits decrease their ability to play, but using

10. examples of successful models that describe ways to teach children how to play may
ameliorate the condition and promote self-actualization. VE can be used to assist in the
development of socially interactive behaviors such as play, one of the characteristics of
self-actualization and a basis for self-esteem as well as the positive regard of others.
Social learning theories describe how we make sense of the world around us through our
social interactions, and that our earliest social actions are experienced through play with
peers.
Playing is important because the interaction with peers facilitates the development
of social skills and it aids the progressive steps of cognitive development. “It provides a
way of practicing culturally important activities and preparing the child for life” (Jordan,
2003, p. 350). The behavior of children with ASDs playing with their peers tends to be
problematically rigid unless there is a strong structure in place. Studies that occurred
before this have little mention of play, but some studies afterwards include features that
can be considered to be more playful.
Virtual Learning Environments for People With Traumatic Brain Injuries
Studies looking at the ability of VE to be useful in assessing learners diagnosed with
traumatic brain injury (TBI) attempt to discover whether or not this type of assessment
accurately predicts how participants will function in real-life situations. Findings include
that this type of testing was able to recognize and identify participants with TBI who also
had memory impairments. The results of this test were compared with standard tests of
memory currently used as assessment instruments and were found to be similar
“suggesting the construct validity of the task” (Matheis et al., 2007, p. 2).

11. The use of VE is superior for this type of assessment when compared to standard
tests because the standard tests are unable to reproduce real world experiences in a
laboratory the way VE does. This type of educational technology can be utilized for
improving learning and learner performance (Kolodner, 2000), increasing physical
mobility, and also is “used for a variety of applications including assessment and
rehabilitation, behavior therapy and phobia treatment, and training and education for
individuals with disabilities” (Cobb, 2007, p. 123). This study was designed with a
system that provided a positive outcome for the selection of the right choice, and was
supportive in facilitating second choices. This system of rewards for only the selection of
pre-chosen correct answers is a behaviorist method applied to a humanist model of
learning.
Learners with a diagnosis of TBI have difficulties performing common activities
of daily living like as orienting themselves in space, which can result in their becoming
lost. Safety is a basic human need and it is addressed in an article by Rizzo (2004) in
which a patient diagnosed with a TBI used VE to rehearse her path of travel within the
hospital. In three weeks worth of lessons, she showed improvement, which the authors
attribute to the VE as a delivery method being able to run faster than real life, and it can
exclude distractions. The ability of educational technology of this type to be paused and
replayed is a distinct advantage over learning in real life. "For some tasks, the
opportunity of combining immediate feedback and processing/discussion, obtainable
through V(E), may offer safety options not possible in the real world." (Rizzo, 2004, p.
223.) Increased safety, as well as its ability to repeat lessons, makes VE a useful tool for
learners with TBI.

12. TBIs can be caused by many types of cerebral accidents, including injuries
received by soldiers who may have concurrent diagnoses of Post Traumatic Stress
Disorder (PTSD). One program in open clinical trails in 2009 used VR to teach Active
Duty participants with diagnoses of PTSD to reduce their anxiety level. This training
increased their level of function to the point that "16 of the 20 completers no longer met
DSM criteria for PTSD at post treatment" (Rizzo et al., 2009, p. 281). This use of
technology created positive physiological reactions that facilitated an environment where
injured combatants learned to function more effectively and, therefore, grow as humans.
Conclusion
Research in the field of learning in Virtual Environments is still in its infancy, but
valid conclusions have been established and a solid foundation for future research has
been established. It has been found to provide a humanist learning environment capable
of fulfilling basic physiological, social, and cognitive needs, which facilitates learning in
individuals with challenges such as ASD and TBI. Experiences delivered through the use
of VE are found to be attractive, elicit reactions similar to those in real life, and can
modify learners' behaviors. Learners with ASD have been found to react to these
repeatable virtual experiences in a similar manner as real-life situations, learn from them,
and are able to use this information to modify future behaviors. The implications of this
conclusion include increased motivation for educators using this type of educational
technology with learners with challenges.

13. References
Austin, D.W., Abbott, J.M., Carbis, C. (2008). The use of virtual reality hypnosis with
two cases of autism spectrum disorder: a feasibility study. Contemporary
Hypnosis, 25(2), 102-109. ISSN: 0960-5290.
Broudy, H. S. (1973). Humanism in education special issue: tradition and the new
sensibility. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 7(2). 67 - 77. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.boisestate.edu
Cobb, S. V. G., Nichols, S., Ramsey, A., & Wilson, J. R. (1999). Virtual reality-induced
symptoms and effects. Presence, 8(2), 169 – 186. doi:10.1162/105474699566152
Cobb, S. V. G. (2007). Virtual environments supporting learning and communication in
special needs education. Topics in Language Disorders, 27(3), 211 - 225. doi:
10.1177/1362361305049032
Jordan, Rita. (2003). Social play and autistic spectrum disorders: A perspective on theory,
implications and educational approaches. Autism, 7(4) 347-360.
doi:10.1177/1362361303007004002
Kolodner, J.L., & Guzdial, M. (2000). Theory and practice on case-based learning aids.
In Jonassen, D. H., & Land, S. M. (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning
environments (pp. 89-121). Malwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Matheis, R. J., Schultheis, M. T., Tiersky, L. A., DeLuca, J., Millis, S. R., & Rizzo, A.
(2007). Is learning and memory different in a visual environment?. Clinical
Neuropsychologist, 21(1), 146-161. Retrieved from http://vrpsych.ict.usc.edu

14. Merriam - Webster Online Dictionary. Humanism. http://www.merriam-
webster.com/dictionary/humanism
Mirenda, P. (2001). Autism, augmentative communication, and assistive technology:
What do we really know?. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities,
16(3), 141. doi: 10.1177/108835760101600302
Mineo, B. A., Ziegler, W., Gill, S., & Salkin, D. (2009). Engagement with electronic
screen media among students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism
& Developmental Disorders, 39(1), 172-187. doi:10.1007/s10803-008-0616-0
Moore, D., Cheng, Y., McGrath, P., & Powell, N. (2005). Collaborative virtual
environment technology for people with autism. Focus on Autism & Other
Developmental Disabilities, 20(4), 231-243. doi:
10.1177/10883576050200040501
Parsons, S., Mitchell, P., & Leonard, A. (2005). Do adolescents with autistic spectrum
disorders adhere to social conventions in virtual environments?. Autism, 9(1), 95-
117. doi: 10.1177/1362361305049032
Rizzo, A.A., Bowerly, T., Buckwalter J.G., Klimchuk, D., Mitura, R., & Parsons, T. D.
(2000). A virtual reality scenario for all seasons: The virtual classroom. CNS
Spectrum 11(1). Retrieved from http://vrpsych.ict.usc.edu
Rizzo, A. A., Difede, J., Rothbaum, B., Johnston, S., McLay, R., Reger, G., Gahm, G.,
Parsons, T., Graap, K., & Pair, J. (2009). VR PTSD Exposure Therapy Results
with Active Duty OIF/OEF Combatant. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 17, 277 -
282. Retrieved from http://vrpsych.ict.usc.edu

15. Rizzo, A. A., Schultheis, M., Kerns, K. A., & Mateer, C. (2004). Analysis of assets for
virtual reality applications in neuropsychology. Neuropsychological
Rehabilitation, 7(1/2), 207 - 239. Retrieved from http://vrpsych.ict.usc.edu