Established in 1972 to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation's waters by preventing point and non-point pollution sources, providing assistance to publicly owned treatment works for the improvement of waste water treatment, and maintaining the integrity of wetlands.
Established in 1972 to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation's waters by preventing point and non-point pollution sources, providing assistance to publicly owned treatment works for the improvement of waste water treatment, and maintaining the integrity of wetlands.
most important topic for more clearance of water quality standards which covers latest Indian and WHO guidelines and provides a real scenario of water standards in India and the recent advances made for purification of water in India and worldwide. The presentation is little bit lengthy but deals with all required aspects in short.
This presentation was given as part of the EPA-funded Catchment Science and Management Course focusing on Integrated Catchment Management, held in June 2015. This course was delivered by RPS Consultants. If you have any queries or comments, or wish to use the material in this presentation, please contact catchments@epa.ie
It is increasingly being recognised internationally that integrated catchment management (ICM) is a useful organising framework for tackling the ongoing challenge of balancing sustainable use and development of our natural resource, against achieving environmental goals. The basic principles of ICM (Williams, 2012) are to:
• Take a holistic and integrated approach to the management of land, biodiversity, water and community resources at the water catchment scale;
• Involve communities in planning and managing their landscapes; and
• Find a balance between resource use and resource conservation
ICM is now well established in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. In Europe the ICM approach has been proposed as being required to achieve effective water and catchment management, and is the approach being promoted by DEFRA for the UK, where it is called the “Catchment Based Approach” (CaBA). The principles and methodologies behind ICM sit well within the context of the Water Framework Directive with its aims and objectives for good water quality, sustainable development and public participation in water resource management. In Ireland it is proposed that the ICM approach will underlie the work and philosophy in developing and implementing future River Basin Management Plans.
Murdock Mfg. explains why public potable drinking water is a concern and which Murdock products will ensure you have sanitary potable water. Murdock Mfg., formerly Murdock-SuperSecur, is a leading designer, manufacturer and supplier of outdoor drinking fountains, hydrants, pre-engineered park and recreation buildings, and bicycle security lockers.
For more information, please visit www.murdockmfg.com
Presentation slides from a professional development seminar on the industrial multisector general permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
This presentation is made for S.Y.Bsc. Students.
The presentation includes Wastewater microbiology. The presentation includes information about sources as well as methods of wastewater treatment.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
most important topic for more clearance of water quality standards which covers latest Indian and WHO guidelines and provides a real scenario of water standards in India and the recent advances made for purification of water in India and worldwide. The presentation is little bit lengthy but deals with all required aspects in short.
This presentation was given as part of the EPA-funded Catchment Science and Management Course focusing on Integrated Catchment Management, held in June 2015. This course was delivered by RPS Consultants. If you have any queries or comments, or wish to use the material in this presentation, please contact catchments@epa.ie
It is increasingly being recognised internationally that integrated catchment management (ICM) is a useful organising framework for tackling the ongoing challenge of balancing sustainable use and development of our natural resource, against achieving environmental goals. The basic principles of ICM (Williams, 2012) are to:
• Take a holistic and integrated approach to the management of land, biodiversity, water and community resources at the water catchment scale;
• Involve communities in planning and managing their landscapes; and
• Find a balance between resource use and resource conservation
ICM is now well established in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. In Europe the ICM approach has been proposed as being required to achieve effective water and catchment management, and is the approach being promoted by DEFRA for the UK, where it is called the “Catchment Based Approach” (CaBA). The principles and methodologies behind ICM sit well within the context of the Water Framework Directive with its aims and objectives for good water quality, sustainable development and public participation in water resource management. In Ireland it is proposed that the ICM approach will underlie the work and philosophy in developing and implementing future River Basin Management Plans.
Murdock Mfg. explains why public potable drinking water is a concern and which Murdock products will ensure you have sanitary potable water. Murdock Mfg., formerly Murdock-SuperSecur, is a leading designer, manufacturer and supplier of outdoor drinking fountains, hydrants, pre-engineered park and recreation buildings, and bicycle security lockers.
For more information, please visit www.murdockmfg.com
Presentation slides from a professional development seminar on the industrial multisector general permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
This presentation is made for S.Y.Bsc. Students.
The presentation includes Wastewater microbiology. The presentation includes information about sources as well as methods of wastewater treatment.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
1. 1
Safe Drinking Water Act
•Standard Setting for Drinking Water
•Public Water Supply Supervision
•Drinking Water Source Protection
• Sole Source Aquifer Program
• Wellhead Protection Program
• Source Water Assessment Program
•Underground Injection Control
•Delegated Program (“Primacy”)
2.
3. Types of Public Water Systems
• Private Domestic Wells- not federally regulated
• Approximately 23 million households (17% of the population)
• Public Water Systems (PWS)
• provide water for human consumption through pipes or other constructed
conveyances
• to at least 15 service connections, or
• serve an average of at least 25 people for at least 60 days a year.
• Types of PWS
• Community- supplies water to the same population year-round (33.5% of PWS)
• at least 25 people at their primary residences or
• at least 15 residences that are primary residences
• mobile home park, sub-divisions, etc.
• 32% obtain drinking water from groundwater
4. Non-Community Public Water Suppliers
• Transient Non-Community Water Systems-
• provide water to 25 or more people for at least 60 days/year but not to the
same people and not on a regular basis
• Highway rest stops, restaurants, campgrounds, hotels, motels, etc.
• 81% obtain drinking water from groundwater
• Non-Transient Non-Community Water Systems
• regularly supply water to at least 25 of the same people at least six month per
year, but not year-round
• schools, factories, office buildings, and hospitals which have their own water
systems
• 87% obtain drinking water from groundwater
5.
6.
7. Types of Drinking Water Contaminants
• Physical contaminants- primarily impact the physical appearance or other
physical properties of water-potability
• Chemical contaminants-may be naturally occurring or anthropogenic. Include
nitrogen, bleach, salts, pesticides, metals, toxins produced by bacteria, and
human or animal drugs.
• Biological/microbiological contaminants- include bacteria, viruses, protozoan,
and parasites.
• Radiological contaminants- examples of radiological contaminants include
cesium, plutonium and uranium.
• Emerging Contaminants- PFAS; PFOS, ;1,2 Dioxane
8. Regulating Contaminants
• Contaminants are "any physical, chemical, biological, or radiological
substance or matter in water.
• Drinking water may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of
some contaminants.
• Some contaminants may be harmful if consumed at certain levels in drinking water.
• The mere presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that the water
poses a health risk
• EPA must establish regulate contaminants determined that:
• may have an adverse effect on the health of persons
• known to occur or substantial likelihood that contaminant is present in public water
systems with a frequency and at levels of public health concern,“ and that
• regulation of such contaminant “presents a meaningful opportunity for health risk
reduction.
9. Contaminant Candidate List (CCL)
• CCL is the first step in the SDWA regulatory framework for screening
and evaluating the contaminants that may require future regulation
• EPA publishes list of contaminants that are not subject to proposed or
promulgated national primary drinking water regulation (NPDWR)
and
• that are known or anticipated to occur in public water systems and
• may require regulations under the SDWA
• CCL List published every five years
• Draft Fifth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 5) published in 2021
10. Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule
(UCMR)
• Every 5 years, EPA must list no more than 30 unregulated
contaminants to be monitored in drinking water by PWS
• UCMRs used to develop CCLs
• EPA has issued five UCMRs
• UCMR 5 will study 30 chemical contaminants between 2023 and 2025
11. National Primary Drinking Water
Regulations (NPDWR)
• Maximum Contaminate Level Goals (MCLGs)
• maximum level of a contaminant at which no known or anticipated adverse health effects occur
with an adequate margin of safety.
• non-enforceable goals based on health effects only
• Maximum Contaminants Levels (MCLs)
• maximum permissible level of a contaminant which is delivered to any user of a public water
system.
• Set as close to the MCLG as is “feasible”.
• Feasible means feasible with the use of the best technology, treatment techniques taking
costs into consideration
• May be used to determine cleanup standards for groundwater contamination
• Public notification was required for all MCL violations
12. Regulations for Public Water Systems
• NPDWR established for 90 contaminants
• Organics
• Inorganics
• Microbials
• Disinfectants
• Radionuclides
• EPA must review five new contaminants every five years
13. Health Advisories
• EPA may issue health advisories for unregulated contaminants
• EPA has issued health advisories to address various circumstances:
• when contaminants do not meet the statutory criteria to warrant a national
primary drinking water regulation,
• as an interim measure while EPA evaluates a contaminant for regulation, or
• to address a short-term incident or spill.
• health advisory levels set at concentrations that are expected to be
protective of the most sensitive subpopulations (e.g., nursing infants)
from any deleterious health effects, with a margin of protection, over
the specified duration of exposure
14. Lead and Copper Rule
•Lead can enter drinking water through corrosion of plumbing materials
-Common source of lead are lead pipes, brass or chrome-plated brass faucets and fixtures with lead
solder.
-Water service lines to building
-Water fountains
•1986 prohibited the use of pipes, solder or flux that are not “lead free” in public water systems or plumbing in
facilities providing water for human consumption
-"lead-free" plumbing may contain up to 8% lead
-solders and flux may not contain more than 0.2 percent
-New rules will lower lead content of pipes, pipe fittings, plumbing fittings, and fixtures to 0.25%
• 1996 Amendments into commerce of any pipe, pipe or plumbing fitting or fixture that is not lead-free
• 2011 Amendments revises “lead-free” to not more than a weighted average of 0.25% of the wetted surface
of pipes, pipe fittings, plumbing fittings, and fixtures and 0.20% for solder and flux
15. Lead and Copper Rule (LCR)
• Applies to public water suppliers
• Could apply to schools, day care, mobile home parks, etc
• Lead action level of 15 ppb
• Sampling
• -Static (six hours and cold) and flush samples
• -Resample or install filters
16.
17.
18.
19. Arsenic in Water
• EPA lowered MCL to 10 ppb
• Many public water systems must treat because of naturally-occurring
arsenic
20. Common Violations
• Monitoring violations
• Maximum Contaminant Level violations
• Failure to do Public Notice
• Failure to report the violation
22. SWDA UIC Program
42 U.S.C. 300h
• Underground Injection Control Program
• To protect drinking water supplies (DWS)
Subsurface emplacement of fluids by well injection
Endangers DWS if results or reasonably expected to result in presence of contaminants
causing non-compliance or adversely affecting health §300h(d)(2)
23. UIC Well Types
• Class I –Deep injection wells used for Hazardous wastes, non-hazardous
industrial wastewater and municipal wastewater
• Class II – inject fluids from oil & gas production for waste fluid disposal and
enhanced recovery (ER)
• Class III –Inject fluids to dissolve minerals (uranium, copper, sulfur and salts)
• Class IV –Inject hazardous or radioactive waste into or above a USDW. Banned
in 1984
• Class V – Any injection well that is not contained in Classes I –IV, or VI
• Class VI – Commercial-scale injection of carbon dioxide, termed geologic
sequestration
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29. Class V Well Requirements Protective Requirements
•Construction and Siting
• -Cannot endanger USDWs
• -Submit inventory information
• -Additional requirements for motor vehicle waste disposal and large capacity
cesspools
•Monitoring and Testing
• -States and EPA can require any well owner to obtain a permit, monitor or close
the well if it poses a potential danger to a USDW
• -Periodic monitoring and reporting
30. Motor Vehicle Waste Disposal Wells
• New motor vehicle waste disposal wells are banned (2000)
• Existing motor vehicle waste disposal wells are banned in regulated
areas.
• States may allow owners and operators to seek a waiver from the ban and obtain a permit.
• Owners and operators must notify the UIC program Director 30 days prior to closing their
motor vehicle waste disposal well.
31.
32.
33.
34. Large-capacity Cesspools
(think Maui)
• New large-capacity cesspools are banned (2000)
• Existing large-capacity cesspools ordered closed by 2005
• Owners and operators must notify the UIC Program Director 30 days
prior to closing their large capacity cesspool.
35.
36. Fracking Exclusion
• Fracking Exclusion- §300h(d)(1)(B)(ii)
Underground injection of fluids or propping agents (other than diesel
fuels)pursuant to hydraulic fracturing related to oil, gas or geothermal
production
37.
38.
39.
40.
41. Emerging Contaminants
• Pollutants detected in waterbodies
• may cause environmental or human health impacts
• typically not regulated under current environmental law
• Sources
• agriculture, industry and manufacturing
• urban runoff
• ordinary household products such as soaps and disinfectants
• Pharmaceuticals
42. How Do ECs Get Into the Environment?
• Discharged as wastewater into surface water
• Stormwater Runoff
• Discharge or seepage into groundwater
• Wastes disposed into landfills that infiltrate into groundwater
• Wastewater sludge applied to agricultural lands
• Food Packaging and Boxes (pizza boxes)
• Commercial household products, including stain- and water-repellent fabrics, nonstick
products (e.g., Teflon), polishes, waxes, paints, cleaning products, and fire-fighting foams
43. Common ECs
• Per- and Polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS);perfluorooctane
sulfonate (PFOS); perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)-most common
• Manufactured chemicals widely in use in various consumer, commercial, and
industrial products since the 1950
• resistant to heat, oil, stains, grease, and water
• “forever chemicals”
• 1,4-Dioxane
• synthetic industrial chemical commonly associated with chlorinated solvents
(particularly 1,1,1-trichloroethane [TCA]) and was widely used as a chemical
stabilizer in other formulations.
• a byproduct or contaminant in consumer products such as laundry detergent
44. Federal Regulatory Actions
• TSCA
• Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) for long-chain PFAS that would require manufacturers (including importers) of PFOA and PFAS to notify and
phase-out use.
• SDWA-
• 5th Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5) data collection on PFAS in drinking water (29 PFAs)
• reissuing final regulatory determinations for PFOA and PFOS (CCL4)
• Health Advisories
• CWA-
• Permitting for indirect and direct dischargers
• RCRA- Interim Guidance on destroying and disposing of certain PFAS and PFAS-containing materials
• Aqueous film-forming foam (for firefighting).
• Soil and biosolids.
• Textiles, other than consumer goods, treated with PFAS.
• Spent filters, membranes, resins, granular carbon, and other waste from water treatment.
• Landfill leachate containing PFAS.
• Solid, liquid, or gas waste streams containing PFAS from facilities manufacturing or using PFAS.
• CERCLA
• Listing as hazardous substances
45. SWDA Regulatory Action for ECs
• EPA Final Regulatory Determination for CCL4 regulated
perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid
(PFOA)
• CCL5 proposes to EPA proposes to list PFAS as a group (except for
PFOA and PFOS)
• URCMR 5 includes 29 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)
46. NYS Regulatory Actions
• Established MCLs for PFAS, PFOS and Dioxane
• PFAS/PFOS-10ppt
• Dioxane- 1 ppb
• $3B Clean Water Infrastructure Act to upgrade water infrastructure
• Surveyed more than 2,500 facilities that may have used, stored, or
manufactured PFAS compounds (e.g., airports, fire training centers,
industrial sites
47. NYS EC Regulatory Actions Cont’d
• Evaluated almost 2,000 landfills across the state for ECs
• 77% of 210 inactive landfills have PFAS above MCLs
• Listed PFAS as hazardous substance under State Superfund Law
• Require EC sampling at 1,400 active State Superfund and Brownfield sites
• Developing Soil Cleanup Objectives (SCOs)
• Ban use of firefighting foam containing PFOA and PFOS in Aqueous Film Forming
Foam (AFFF)
• Limit amount of 1,4-Dioxane in household cleansing, personal care, and cosmetic
products
• Developing product disclosure requirements
48. Litigation
• Saint-Gobain and Honeywell (Hoosick Falls)
• Taconic Plastics (Petersburg)
• Norlite, LLC (AFFF incineration)
• Multi-District Litigation (3M, Dupont and other manufacturers)
• Department of Defense (AFFF contamination L.I. and Hudson Valley)
• Water Utilities
• Shareholder Litigation
• Homeowner BI/PD Claims