This document discusses sustainable food environments and criteria for assessing them. It provides background on the relationship between food and sustainability, and sustainable food production and consumption patterns. It then discusses implications for built environments and developing criteria to define sustainable food environments. Examples of proposed criteria include access to local, affordable produce retailers and prioritizing restaurants with local, plant-based menus. Metrics like household ecological footprints and a neighborhood sustainability assessment are presented. Recommendations include refining food footprint calculators, indicators for affordability, and accounting for density and resources in local food criteria.
A March 2009 final report given to the Illinois General Assembly by the Local and Organic Food and Farm Task Force opened with the following statement:
Illinois consumers spend $48 billion annually on food. Nearly all of this money leaves the state. To retain a larger share of Illinois food dollars, public, private, and civic sectors must work together to build a farm and food system that meets consumer demand for “local” food.
A March 2009 final report given to the Illinois General Assembly by the Local and Organic Food and Farm Task Force opened with the following statement:
Illinois consumers spend $48 billion annually on food. Nearly all of this money leaves the state. To retain a larger share of Illinois food dollars, public, private, and civic sectors must work together to build a farm and food system that meets consumer demand for “local” food.
Best Practices in Urban Agriculture
`
For more information, Please see websites below:
`
Organic Edible Schoolyards & Gardening with Children =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851214 ~
`
Double Food Production from your School Garden with Organic Tech =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851079 ~
`
Free School Gardening Art Posters =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Increase Food Production with Companion Planting in your School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Healthy Foods Dramatically Improves Student Academic Success =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851348 ~
`
City Chickens for your Organic School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239850440 ~
`
Simple Square Foot Gardening for Schools - Teacher Guide =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851110 ~
Acn202 - Managerial Accounting !!ATTENTION PLEASE!!
Please use this as you're general idea & knowledge
*Do not copy *Faculties use plagiarism software, that will redirect and connect your assignment to this link if you intend to do so.
Food security has been a high priority in the socio-economic policy of Uzbekistan since the early years of independence. As a result of policies pursued, Uzbekistan has managed to achieve (and maintain thereafter) grain independence,1 and increase its per capita production of meat, milk, eggs, fruit and vegetables substantially enough to achieve self-sufficiency in basic foods. These accomplishments have been made possible mainly by institutional reforms, including the transformation of inefficient shirkats (agricultural cooperatives) into private farms, the development of private initiatives in food storage, processing and distribution, the establishment of the Arable Land Amelioration Fund to maintain and improve the quality of farmland, and so on.
Ensuring food security, therefore, will require more complex approaches, policies and tools. Therefore, in order to ensure the nation’s food security in the long term more complex and comprehensive approaches and policies need
to be implemented. Food security should be considered as an integrated issue incorporating three key dimensions: 1) food availability; 2) access to food; and 3) balanced and highquality nutrition. The principal benchmarks of food policy should address these three key areas.
Paper on Water Resilience in Urban Areas at the ASOCSA 11th BuiltEnvironment Conference 6-8 August 2017, Durban.
The paper covers:
Climate change predictions for South Africa
Climate change predictions for South Africa
Urban water systems
Water Resilience Assessment Framework
Discussion
Conclusion and Recommendations
Best Practices in Urban Agriculture
`
For more information, Please see websites below:
`
Organic Edible Schoolyards & Gardening with Children =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851214 ~
`
Double Food Production from your School Garden with Organic Tech =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851079 ~
`
Free School Gardening Art Posters =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Increase Food Production with Companion Planting in your School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Healthy Foods Dramatically Improves Student Academic Success =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851348 ~
`
City Chickens for your Organic School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239850440 ~
`
Simple Square Foot Gardening for Schools - Teacher Guide =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851110 ~
Acn202 - Managerial Accounting !!ATTENTION PLEASE!!
Please use this as you're general idea & knowledge
*Do not copy *Faculties use plagiarism software, that will redirect and connect your assignment to this link if you intend to do so.
Food security has been a high priority in the socio-economic policy of Uzbekistan since the early years of independence. As a result of policies pursued, Uzbekistan has managed to achieve (and maintain thereafter) grain independence,1 and increase its per capita production of meat, milk, eggs, fruit and vegetables substantially enough to achieve self-sufficiency in basic foods. These accomplishments have been made possible mainly by institutional reforms, including the transformation of inefficient shirkats (agricultural cooperatives) into private farms, the development of private initiatives in food storage, processing and distribution, the establishment of the Arable Land Amelioration Fund to maintain and improve the quality of farmland, and so on.
Ensuring food security, therefore, will require more complex approaches, policies and tools. Therefore, in order to ensure the nation’s food security in the long term more complex and comprehensive approaches and policies need
to be implemented. Food security should be considered as an integrated issue incorporating three key dimensions: 1) food availability; 2) access to food; and 3) balanced and highquality nutrition. The principal benchmarks of food policy should address these three key areas.
Paper on Water Resilience in Urban Areas at the ASOCSA 11th BuiltEnvironment Conference 6-8 August 2017, Durban.
The paper covers:
Climate change predictions for South Africa
Climate change predictions for South Africa
Urban water systems
Water Resilience Assessment Framework
Discussion
Conclusion and Recommendations
Assessing Sustainability of Building Materials in Developing Countries: The S...Jeremy Gibberd
This article investigates the nature of sustainability assessment of building materials in order to critically review the Sustainable Building Material Index methodology. A literature study is carried out to define sustainability, develop assessment indicators for building materials and describe, and critically review, the Sustainable Building Material Index (SBMI).
The SBMI methodology appears to have potential as a way of providing an indication of the sustainability impacts of building materials and products for developing countries. The SBMI methodology is innovative as it provides a way of capturing simple socio-economic sustainability aspects related to building products, which has not been included in many other building product assessment methodologies.
Building development trajectories refers to the path being followed by the development of built environments. This path can be influenced, and change, depending on external factors such as economic climate, client preferences, legislation and fashion. It can also be intentional and have a specific direction and destination that is established and followed by government and users, owners, planners and designers of built environment.
The scale and nature of social, economic and environmental pressures, climate change and the limited resources to address these challenges mean that new built environment development models need to be developed. This paper describes, and reviews, a sustainable development model for the built environment that addresses these issues. The model aims to ensure that sustainability is not just a consideration in the development of built environments, but is integrated in way that defines and directs building development trajectories.
The theoretical basis of the model is described and a tool and methodology for application presented. The review and discussion of the model and tool is undertaken and recommendations for further research and development are made.
Assessing the built environment's contribuition to sustainable developmentJeremy Gibberd
Short presentation on using the Sustainable Building Assessment Tool, SBAT, in developing countries, with particular reference to the Human Development Index, Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity
Sustainability Assessment of Informal BrickmakingJeremy Gibberd
Sustainable Building Material Index (SBMI) assessment of informal brick making site in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Slides shows current process provides recommendations and illustrates draft SBMI assessments.
Neighbourhood Facilities for Sustainability: Short Cuts to Sustainable Settle...Jeremy Gibberd
It is increasingly acknowledged that current plans to implement sustainability are not achieving the scale and speed of change required. National built environment strategies to address sustainability tend to focus on large-scale programmes in areas such as renewable energy and energy efficiency. While this approach can
improve national environmental indicators such as carbon emissions profiles; it appears unlikely to achieve sustainability.
In recent paper titled Neighbourhood Facilities for Sustainability, Jeremy Gibberd argues that more comprehensive, and more local, approaches are required. Interventions at a neighbourhood level should be developed that enable day-to-day living patterns to become more sustainable over time. A key element of this are built environment characteristics and facilities which support sustainability. This presentation illustrates the concept
"Understanding the Carbon Cycle: Processes, Human Impacts, and Strategies for...MMariSelvam4
The carbon cycle is a critical component of Earth's environmental system, governing the movement and transformation of carbon through various reservoirs, including the atmosphere, oceans, soil, and living organisms. This complex cycle involves several key processes such as photosynthesis, respiration, decomposition, and carbon sequestration, each contributing to the regulation of carbon levels on the planet.
Human activities, particularly fossil fuel combustion and deforestation, have significantly altered the natural carbon cycle, leading to increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations and driving climate change. Understanding the intricacies of the carbon cycle is essential for assessing the impacts of these changes and developing effective mitigation strategies.
By studying the carbon cycle, scientists can identify carbon sources and sinks, measure carbon fluxes, and predict future trends. This knowledge is crucial for crafting policies aimed at reducing carbon emissions, enhancing carbon storage, and promoting sustainable practices. The carbon cycle's interplay with climate systems, ecosystems, and human activities underscores its importance in maintaining a stable and healthy planet.
In-depth exploration of the carbon cycle reveals the delicate balance required to sustain life and the urgent need to address anthropogenic influences. Through research, education, and policy, we can work towards restoring equilibrium in the carbon cycle and ensuring a sustainable future for generations to come.
Artificial Reefs by Kuddle Life Foundation - May 2024punit537210
Situated in Pondicherry, India, Kuddle Life Foundation is a charitable, non-profit and non-governmental organization (NGO) dedicated to improving the living standards of coastal communities and simultaneously placing a strong emphasis on the protection of marine ecosystems.
One of the key areas we work in is Artificial Reefs. This presentation captures our journey so far and our learnings. We hope you get as excited about marine conservation and artificial reefs as we are.
Please visit our website: https://kuddlelife.org
Our Instagram channel:
@kuddlelifefoundation
Our Linkedin Page:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/kuddlelifefoundation/
and write to us if you have any questions:
info@kuddlelife.org
WRI’s brand new “Food Service Playbook for Promoting Sustainable Food Choices” gives food service operators the very latest strategies for creating dining environments that empower consumers to choose sustainable, plant-rich dishes. This research builds off our first guide for food service, now with industry experience and insights from nearly 350 academic trials.
Characterization and the Kinetics of drying at the drying oven and with micro...Open Access Research Paper
The objective of this work is to contribute to valorization de Nephelium lappaceum by the characterization of kinetics of drying of seeds of Nephelium lappaceum. The seeds were dehydrated until a constant mass respectively in a drying oven and a microwawe oven. The temperatures and the powers of drying are respectively: 50, 60 and 70°C and 140, 280 and 420 W. The results show that the curves of drying of seeds of Nephelium lappaceum do not present a phase of constant kinetics. The coefficients of diffusion vary between 2.09.10-8 to 2.98. 10-8m-2/s in the interval of 50°C at 70°C and between 4.83×10-07 at 9.04×10-07 m-8/s for the powers going of 140 W with 420 W the relation between Arrhenius and a value of energy of activation of 16.49 kJ. mol-1 expressed the effect of the temperature on effective diffusivity.
Natural farming @ Dr. Siddhartha S. Jena.pptxsidjena70
A brief about organic farming/ Natural farming/ Zero budget natural farming/ Subash Palekar Natural farming which keeps us and environment safe and healthy. Next gen Agricultural practices of chemical free farming.
Willie Nelson Net Worth: A Journey Through Music, Movies, and Business Venturesgreendigital
Willie Nelson is a name that resonates within the world of music and entertainment. Known for his unique voice, and masterful guitar skills. and an extraordinary career spanning several decades. Nelson has become a legend in the country music scene. But, his influence extends far beyond the realm of music. with ventures in acting, writing, activism, and business. This comprehensive article delves into Willie Nelson net worth. exploring the various facets of his career that have contributed to his large fortune.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Willie Nelson net worth is a testament to his enduring influence and success in many fields. Born on April 29, 1933, in Abbott, Texas. Nelson's journey from a humble beginning to becoming one of the most iconic figures in American music is nothing short of inspirational. His net worth, which estimated to be around $25 million as of 2024. reflects a career that is as diverse as it is prolific.
Early Life and Musical Beginnings
Humble Origins
Willie Hugh Nelson was born during the Great Depression. a time of significant economic hardship in the United States. Raised by his grandparents. Nelson found solace and inspiration in music from an early age. His grandmother taught him to play the guitar. setting the stage for what would become an illustrious career.
First Steps in Music
Nelson's initial foray into the music industry was fraught with challenges. He moved to Nashville, Tennessee, to pursue his dreams, but success did not come . Working as a songwriter, Nelson penned hits for other artists. which helped him gain a foothold in the competitive music scene. His songwriting skills contributed to his early earnings. laying the foundation for his net worth.
Rise to Stardom
Breakthrough Albums
The 1970s marked a turning point in Willie Nelson's career. His albums "Shotgun Willie" (1973), "Red Headed Stranger" (1975). and "Stardust" (1978) received critical acclaim and commercial success. These albums not only solidified his position in the country music genre. but also introduced his music to a broader audience. The success of these albums played a crucial role in boosting Willie Nelson net worth.
Iconic Songs
Willie Nelson net worth is also attributed to his extensive catalog of hit songs. Tracks like "Blue Eyes Crying in the Rain," "On the Road Again," and "Always on My Mind" have become timeless classics. These songs have not only earned Nelson large royalties but have also ensured his continued relevance in the music industry.
Acting and Film Career
Hollywood Ventures
In addition to his music career, Willie Nelson has also made a mark in Hollywood. His distinctive personality and on-screen presence have landed him roles in several films and television shows. Notable appearances include roles in "The Electric Horseman" (1979), "Honeysuckle Rose" (1980), and "Barbarosa" (1982). These acting gigs have added a significant amount to Willie Nelson net worth.
Television Appearances
Nelson's char
UNDERSTANDING WHAT GREEN WASHING IS!.pdfJulietMogola
Many companies today use green washing to lure the public into thinking they are conserving the environment but in real sense they are doing more harm. There have been such several cases from very big companies here in Kenya and also globally. This ranges from various sectors from manufacturing and goes to consumer products. Educating people on greenwashing will enable people to make better choices based on their analysis and not on what they see on marketing sites.
2. Structure
• What is the relationship between food and sustainability?
• Are there sustainable food production and consumption
patterns?
• If so, what are the implications of these for built
environments?
• Can criteria be developed to assess built environment
support for more sustainable food consumption and
production patterns / can we define ‘sustainable food
environments’?
3. Environmental impacts of food
http://www.wri.org/blog/2013/12/global-food-challenge-explained-18-graphics
4. Social and economic impacts of food
http://www.wri.org/blog/2013/12/global-food-challenge-explained-18-graphics
5. Climate change and food (at +3oC)
http://www.wri.org/blog/2013/12/global-food-challenge-explained-18-graphics
7. Ecological Footprint
• An Ecological Footprint is an estimate of the amount of
biologically productive land and sea required to provide the
resources a human population consumes and absorb the
corresponding waste. These estimates are based on
consumption and production of waste in the following areas:
• Food, measured in type and amount of food consumed
• Shelter, measured in size, utilization and energy consumption
• Mobility, measured in type of transport used and distances
traveled
• Goods, measured in type and quantity consumed
• Services, measured in type and quantity consumed
8. Development of the SBAT
WWF 2006
Ecological Footprint &
Human Development Index
9. Household Ecological Footprint
Calculator
Vegetables, potatoes & fruit
Bread and bakery products
Flour, rice, noodles, cereal
products (exc maize)
Maize
Beans and other dried pulses
Milk, cream, yogurt, sour cream
Ice cream, other frozen dairy
Cheese, butter
Eggs [assumed to be 50 g each]
Meat
Pork
Chicken, turkey
Beef
Fish
Sugar
Vegetable oil (seed or olive oil)
Margarine
Coffee & tea
Juice & wine
Beer
Garden [area used for food]
Eating out
Assess your Household's Ecological Footprint
by Mathis Wackernagel, Ritik Dholakia, Diana Deumling, and Dick Richardson,
Redefining Progress, v 2.0, March 2000
First, (and optional) calculate how many minutes of life energy it takes to earn one dollar. (Enter your income and hours worked) Fulfillment:
2,000dollars earned per month (after taxes) 40.00hours of work per week Alignment:
600work related dollars spent per month 12.00
unpaid hours per week for work preparation
(commuting etc.)
Ittakes 10
minutes of life energy to earn one
dollar! After FI:
+ :
- :
Second, choose whether you want to work with metric or US measurements. m
: put "m" for metric, "s" for US
standard 0 :
Third, register your monthly consumption in column D (or your yearly consumption in column E). Optional: put the dollar amounts into column F.
Number
of people
in the
househol
d: 5 (land and sea space in square meters)
AMOUNT
eqv.
amount Dollars I) FOSSIL II) ARABLE
III)
PASTURE IV) FOREST
V) BUILT-
UP VI) SEA
CATEGORIES Units per month per year spent (mth) ENERGY LAND LAND
1.-FOOD
Enter percentage of food purchased that is wasted rather than eaten in
your household. 0% ( 26 percent is the national average)
How muchof the food that you buy is locally grown, unprocessed and in-
season? e a. Most food we buy is packaged, out of season and fromfar away.
b.
About a
quarter
c. About half
0% d. About three quarters
e.
Most all the food we get is locally grown, unprocessed, and in-
season.
.Veggies, potatoes & fruit [kg] 30.0 360 $0.00 0 377
.Bread [kg] 20.0 240 $0.00 0 677
.Rice, cereals, noodles, etc. [kg] 15.0 180 $0.00 0 682
.Beans [kg] 10.0 120 $0.00 0 1,684
.Milk & yogurt [l] 40.0 480 $0.00 0 11,554
.Icecream, sour cream [l] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0
.Cheese, butter [kg] 6.0 72 $0.00 0 17,330
.Eggs [assumed to be 50 g each] [number] 80.0 960 $0.00 0 607
.Meat
..Pork [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0
..Chicken, turkey [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0
..Beef (grain fed) [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0 0
..Beef (pasture fed) [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0
.Fish [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0
.Juice& wine [l] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0
.Sugar [kg] 1.0 12 $0.00 0 23
.Vegetable oil & fat
..solid [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0
..liquid [l] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0
.Tea & coffee [kg] 2.0 24 $0.00 0 452
.Garden [areaused for food] [m2] 30.0 30 30
.Eating out [complete meals] [number] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0 0
SUB-TOTAL-1 $0.00 0 4,532 28,884 0 0 0
2.-HOUSING
.House[living area]
..brickhouse [m2] 200 200 $0.00 1,506
..wooden house (US standard) [m2] 0 0 $0.00 0 0
.Yard[or total lot size incl. building] [m2] 400 400 $0.00 555
. Hotels, Motels [$] 0 0 $0.00 0 0
.Electricity (also check composition--
see note) [kWh] 0 0 $0.00
enter as fraction. ex. 25% = 0.25
..thermally produced (fossil and
nuclear) 100% 0
..lower course hydro 0% 0
..highaltitude hydro 0% 0
..PV solar (on exisiting roof
areas) 0%
..so
lar
[on
ne
wly
buil
t-up
are
a]
..PV solar (on newly built-
up area) 0% 0
..wind 0% 0
.Fossil gas (natural gas)
..city gas [m3] 0.0 0 $0.00 0
..bottled liquid gas [kg] 20.0 240 $0.00 1,032
.Liquid fossil fuel (oil)
..involume [l] 0.0 0 $0.00 0
..inweight [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0
.Coal [kg] 0 $0.00 0
.Water (notincluded since it
depends on local circumstances) [m3] 0 0 $0.00 0
.Straw [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0
.Firewood [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0
.Constr. wood & furniture [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0
SUB-TOTAL-2 $0.00 2,538 0 0 0 555 0
Footprint Calculation Matrix for Households .....CONTINUED page #2 of 3
(land and sea space in square meters)
AMOUNT
eqv.
amount Dollars I) FOSSIL II) ARABLE
III)
PASTURE IV) FOREST
V) BUILT-
UP VI) SEA
CATEGORIES Units per month per year spent (mth) ENERGY LAND LAND
3.- TRANSPORTATION
.Bus/train [pers.*km] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0
.Taxi / other´s car [km] 5.0 60 $0.00 34 3
.Gasoline (if you have a car) [l] 10.0 120 $0.00 887 80
.Partsfor repair [kg] 1.0 12 $0.00 169
.Airplane
[pers.*hou
rs] 0.0 0 $0.00 0
SUB-TOTAL-3 $0.00 1,090 0 0 0 83 0
4.-GOODS
.Clothes (if bought used, count them at 1/3 of their true
weight)
..cotton [kg] 5.0 60 $0.00 169 943 17
..wool [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0 0
..fossilbased (synthetic) [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0
Durable paper products (books) and
hygenic paper products (toilet/tissue
paper) [kg] 5.0 60 $0.00 493 519 49
.Tools, metal parts [kg] 5.0 60 $0.00 507 51
.Leather [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0 0
.Plastic products and photos [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0
.Porcelain, glass [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0
.Medicine [kg] 1.0 12 $0.00 338 34
.Hygiene products, cleaning stuff [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0
.Cigarettes [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0 0
SUB-TOTAL-4 $0.00 1,507 943 0 519 151 0
5.-SERVICES (rough estimates)
.Laundry service (external) [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0
.Postal services
..international [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0
..domestic [kg] 0.0 0 $0.00 0 0
.Household insurances [$] 60.0 720 $60.00 170 1102 38
.Telephone, electronics, photo
equipment [$] 25.0 300 $25.00 304 68
.Medical services and medical
insurance [$] 0 $0.00 0 0
.Entertainment [$] 60.0 720 $60.00 730 163
.Education [$] 100.0 1200 $100.00 608 136
SUB-TOTAL-5 $245.00 1813 0 0 1102 404 0
6.- WASTE (assuming everything compostable is composted, and waste =
packaging)
enter
percentage
recycledin
your
household: 80% 95
.Household waste:
..paper [kg] 10.0 120 $0.00 379 1031 38
..aluminum [kg] 3.0 36 $0.00 304 31
..magnetic metal [kg] 5.0 60 $0.00 446 45
..glass [kg] 5.0 60 $0.00 96 10
..plastic [kg] 9.0 108 $0.00 335 34
SUB-TOTAL-6 0.0 384 $0.00 1560 0 0 1031 156 0
by Mathis Wackernagel, Ritik Dholakia, Diana Deumling, and Dick
Richardson, Redefining Progress, v 2.0, March 2000
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
gha
WASTE
SERVICES
GOODS
TRANSPORTATION
HOUSING
FOOD
10. Sustainable food environment
criteria
Criteria
FO1 There is access to / a retailer of locally produced fresh vegetables and fruit
within 2 km. The cost of these products is affordable for the local population.
FO2 There is access to / a retailer of locally produced beans and pulses within 2 km.
The cost of these products is affordable for the local population.
FO3 There is access to / a retailer of bakery products within the 2km. The cost of
these products is affordable for the local population.
FO4 There is access to / a retailer of locally produced milk, cheese and eggs within
the 2 km. The cost of these products is affordable for the local population.
FO5 Access to products such as highly processed and non-local foods as well as oil,
tea, coffee, beers, juice and wine, meat and fish are more difficult to access than
food types in FO 1-4.
FO6 Fifty per cent of the cultivated area within the neighbourhood is used to produce
fresh vegetables and fruit.
FO 7 Restaurants with menus based on locally produced fruit, vegetables and include
vegetarian and diary and egg-based dishes, should be given preferential
locations over restaurants which have menu based on high ecological footprint
items such as meat and imported items.
12. Built Environment Sustainability Tool
(BEST)
www.sustainablebuiltenvironments.com
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
0.001.002.003.004.005.00
EcologicalFootprintCapability
Human Development Capability
13. Recommendations & Conclusions
• Household ecological footprint calculators: need to include
defined minimum nutritional requirements for diets.
• Affordability of food: need for indicator ie, X% of the
household income.
• Local cultivation of vegetables and fruit indicator: Need to
take into account densities, employment, diets, local climate,
availability of water, productivity of soils, pollution
• Social capital: Interaction related to food.
• Useful insight into how built environments may support the
reduction of ecological footprints associated with food.
• Further development to include sustainable food
environment criteria in sustainability / green building ratings