The document discusses the merits and drawbacks of different people who could potentially survive in a bunker. It evaluates a married couple who would have drug babies, a welfare dependent who would be lazy, a disabled person and elderly woman who wouldn't be very helpful, a pregnant woman who would be a burden, an army officer with a disability who could become dangerous, a lawyer who may argue, and a 5-year old who would be a lot of work. Overall, the document dismissively evaluates these groups and whether they would be worthwhile survivors.

1. Sylvia Jenkins
FYS
Survivor Activity
The Married couple- They are on drugs and would repopulate with drug babies
that don't stop crying.
Welfare dependent- They are very lazy and wouldn't help out with anything that
needed to be done to keep everybody alive.
Disabled person- Won't bring much to the table when it comes to helping out and
providing.
Elderly woman- She is already very old, she can't repopulate and has seen her
fair share of life.
Pregnant woman- She would be a burden and the baby wouldn't have the right
nutrition.
Army Officer- He or she has a mental disability and could go on a rampage at
any moment and they also might not like being confined in the bunker.
The lawyer- We don't need anyone arguing because that won't help anybody's
situation.
5 yr. old- Doesn't bring anything to the table and will be more work than help in
the long run.