2. The first
question on the
survey was if the
overall magazine
has been
improved. 100%
said yes which is
an increase of
20%.
3. The second
question on the
survey was if the
new, old or both
versions were
preferred. As
shown 80%
preferred the
new version,
however it was
reassuring to see
that both
versions of my
magazine was
satisfactory by
20%.
4. The third
question on the
survey was if the
contents page
included more
artist variety. As
shown 100% said
yes.
5. The fourth
question from
the survey was if
the article was
laid out properly.
90% said yes and
only 10% said
no, this suggests
that personal
preference has
been shown here
as the layout of
my article is
seen in many
other music
magazines.
6. The fifth
question on the
survey was if the
front cover was
clear (the text)
and if it was
professional. As
shown 100% said
yes.
7. The sixth
question on the
survey was what
score they would
give the
magazine out
Excellent, Very
good, Okay and
Unsatisfactory.
As shown 80%
said excellent
and 20% said
very good which
suggests the
magazine
appeals to a wide
range of
audiences.
8. The seventh
question on the
survey was
which piece out
of three they
preferred. As
shown the
majority
preferred the
front cover (80%)
and the rest
preferred the
feature article
(20%).
9. The eighth and
final question on
the survey was if
they would buy my
magazine. As
shown, 90% said
yes and 10% said
they would not
because they are
not interested in
the genre which
generally shows
that most would
but the magazine,
even if it is not
their preferred
genre.
10. Overall from my results, it is proven that
important and significant changes were
made and has been made to be even
more professional. Simple things such as
layout and added information has been
altered and restructured to make the
magazine more realistic. Finally, with
100% of people happy with my magazine
I have no further changes to make.
