The document discusses who the author would eliminate and keep during a survival activity. They would eliminate the married couple, priest, disabled person, lazy welfare dependent, lawyer, and university professor because they would not be helpful or able to do hard labor. They would keep the single pregnant woman, her five year old child, the scientist, the doctor, and the army officer because they could nurture people, the child should not be eliminated, and the others could care for people and help with survival.

1. On the survival activity I would get rid of the get rid of the married couple, the priest, the disabled person,
the lazy welfare dependent, the lawyer and, the university professor. I would get rid of the married couple
because they would be too worried about drugs. I would get rid of the priest because he wouldn't be into
hard labor. I would get rid of the disabled person because he/she wouldn't be able to do much. I would
get rid of the lazy welfare dependent because they are lazy and wouldn't help. I would get rid of the
lawyer because he would be too complicated. I would get rid of the university professor because he
wouldn't do much to keep me alive. I would keep the single pregnant woman, her five year old child, the
scientist, the doctor, and the army officer. I would keep the single pregnant woman because she can
nurture the people. I would keep the five year old because it would be mean not to. I would keep the
doctor because he can take care the people. I would keep the scientist because she would be helpful. I
would keep the army officer because he's been through war and would help us survive.