This document contains information about Sumit Kumar Dhanwar, a student pursuing his M.Com 2nd semester. It discusses key definitions related to holders and holders in due course under corporate legal framework. Specifically, it defines a holder as a person who has possession of a negotiable instrument and is entitled to receive payment. A holder in due course is a holder who acquires the instrument for value, in good faith, without defects in title, and before the instrument's maturity date. The document provides examples and exceptions to these definitions.

1. NAME –: SUMIT KUMAR DHANWAR
CLASS –: M.COM 2ND SEMESTER
ADMISSION NO. –: 52234
SUBJECT –: CORPORET LEGAL FAMEWOEK
SUBMITTED TO -: DR. NIDHI KHURANA

2. The definition given in section 8 implies that any
person (a) who is entitled in his own name to the
possession of the negotiable instrument and (b) has
right to receive the amount from the parties thereto.
⚫ (a) Possession of instrument
⚫ (b) Entitled to receive the amount

3. ⚫ HOLDER is owner ; Barring Theft;
i. Payee ( I promise to pay ₹ 5000 to X ; X is Holder)
ii. Bearer ( I promise to pay ₹ 5000 to bearer ; bearer is
holder )
NOTE :
a) Actual possession immaterial; de jure possession
b) He has right to sue
PAYMENTS TO BE MADE TO HOLDER

4. ⚫ A principal whose name appears on an instrument as the
holder though it is executed in the name of his agent for
him.
⚫ Where a negotiable instrument is in the name of the
partner of a firm, it naturally becomes a holder, as it is not a
separate entity from the partner.
⚫ Where a negotiable is a bearer one , any person who is in
the possession of such instrument is the holder.
⚫ The endorsee of a cheque is called a holder.
⚫ If a holder of a negotiable instrument is dead, the heirs of
the deceased holder become the holders.
⚫ A principal on whose behalf a pronote is endorsed in blank
and is delivered to his agent, he is a holder of the
instrument though his name appear on the instrument.

5. ⚫ A thief or a finder of an instrument is not a holder
though he is in possession of an instrument.
⚫ The word “entitled” used in the person who claims to
be the holder must be acquired in a lawful manner. A
person obtaining the instrument under forgery is not a
holder.
⚫ When the endorsement of a bill is ‘ for collection only’
the endorsee cannot be a holder.
⚫ The above mentioned lists are not complete.

6. The definition of holder in due course under Section 9
means that any person who for the consideration paid
becomes the possessor of a negotiable instruments,
before its maturity, in good faith and without any
sufficient reason to believe that any defect existed in
the title of the person from whom he obtained it.
In simple words, any person for consideration
becomes , possessor of negotiable instruments, if
payable to bearer, by possession. If negotiable
instrument is order instrument – payable to payee,
by endorsement.

7. ⚫ Possessor- if negotiable instrument is payable to
bearer.
⚫ Indorsee- if negotiable instrument is payable to order.
⚫ Payee can be HDC in India, even though the
instrument has not been negotiated by him, its been
issued to him.
i) due consideration paid;
ii) receive before maturity date(post maturity-
holder(not HDC)has rights of the transferer)
iii) Good faith;due care and caution-about good title of
transferer – no HDC

8. ⚫ If :
a) He obtains the negotiable instrument after its
maturity, or
b) He obtains it by way or a gift; or
c) He obtains it for any unlawful consideration, or
d) He obtains it by some illegal method, or
e) He does not obtain it bonafide
He is not considered to be a holder in due course.

9. ⚫ Liability of prior parties
⚫ Installment purged or clensed of all defects
⚫ Privilege in case of inchoate stamped instrument not
affected
⚫ No effect of conditional delivery or of special delivery.
⚫ No effect of absence of consideration or presence of an
unlawful consideration:
⚫ Privilege in case of a fictitious bill
⚫ Estoppels against denying original validity of instrument
⚫ Estoppels against denying capacity of payee to endorsee
⚫ Estoppels against endorser to deny capacity of prior parties.

10. ⚫ a) A holder can obtain an instrument without consideration
while a person cannot be a holder in due course unless he
obtains an instrument with consideration and for value.
⚫ b) If an instrument is inchoate, a holder of such instrument
cannot get good title in the instrument. While holder in due
course acquires a good title even if the instrument is inchoate.
⚫ c) A holder of an instrument may acquire the instrument if it
becomes payable. But the persons is not treated as a holder in
due course if he acquires an instrument when it becomes
payable.
⚫ d) A holder need not bother about the defect, if any, in the
title. But no holder is considered a holder in due course who
acquires an instrument knowingly the defect of the title.