The Stoics believed that our wealth, status, power, possession and stature are neither good or bad, and they have no social importance with respect to our relationships with one another. We are equals. They held that external differences, such as rank and wealth, are of no importance in social relationships.
Stoic Belief - The Philosophy Of Virtue And Ethics
The document provides an overview of several topics in ethics, including:
1. It discusses philosophers like Aristotle, Epicurus, Epictetus and schools of thought like hedonism and Cyrenaic hedonism.
2. It defines key concepts in meta-ethics like descriptivism, cognitivism, and realism as well as applied ethics.
3. It summarizes the perspectives of different philosophers and schools of thought on topics like the good life, pleasure, self-mastery, and the pursuit of happiness.
Realism holds that reality exists independently of human minds and perceptions. It asserts that objects have intrinsic natures that are not dependent on beliefs, perceptions, or interpretations. According to realism, reality behaves in predictable and repeatable patterns regardless of human sensory experiences. The key principle of realism is independence - that reality exists on its own and is not contingent on the human mind. Realism favors an education system focused on teaching objective facts and truth through a standardized curriculum emphasizing sciences and the liberal arts.
Frameworks and principles behind our moral dispositionmarymaypaleyan
According to Aristotle, happiness is not pleasure, honor, or wealth, but rather an activity of the soul in accordance with virtue. Virtue is developed through habit, with virtuous actions becoming habitual over time until one naturally acts virtuously without conscious effort. For Kant, a good will is one that acts from duty and respects the moral law, motivated by a sense of obligation rather than any expected consequences. A good will treats humanity as an end in itself.
Virtue, Ethics and Morality in Business Essay
Theories Of Virtue Ethics
Virtue Ethics Theory Essay
Ethics
An Argument On Virtue Ethics Essay
Essay On Virtue Ethics
Virtue Essays
Understanding Virtue Ethics
Examples Of Virtue Ethics
Virtue Ethics : A Theory Of Morality
Virtue Ethics
Aristotle Virtue Ethics Essays
Essay on Virtue Ethics
Kant vs. Virtue Ethics Essay
Over Virtue Ethics Summary
Virtue Ethics Approach Essay examples
Virtue Ethics Essay
What Is Virtue Ethics
Virtue Ethics Research Paper
Example Of Virtue Ethics
The document discusses different philosophical theories about the source of ethics. It outlines views that ethics comes from human nature, that it involves living well according to virtue as described by Aristotle, and that it involves following a priori moral truths or duties as argued by Kant. The document provides details on Socrates, Aristotle, and Kant's perspectives, with Socrates arguing ethics comes from knowledge, Aristotle arguing it involves pursuing eudaimonia through virtue, and Kant arguing ethics follows from following categorical imperatives and duties.
The document discusses different philosophical perspectives on the concept of self. It explains that according to Socrates and Plato, the self is the soul rather than the physical body, and is immortal. Plato viewed the self as having three parts - the rational, spirited, and appetitive parts. Aristotle believed the essence is subsumed within phenomena. For Augustine, the self is defined by its relationship to God. Aquinas argued self-knowledge depends on experiences of the external world. Descartes defined the self as a thinking thing distinct from the body.
This document discusses perspectives in education and educational philosophy. It begins by defining philosophy and explaining how philosophers think about meaning and interpretation. It then outlines four major educational philosophies: Perennialism, which focuses on teaching enduring ideas and cultivating the intellect; Essentialism, which emphasizes transmitting a core body of knowledge; Progressivism, which emphasizes learning through experience and the interests of the student; and Reconstructionism/Critical Theory, which focuses on social reform and addressing real problems. The document also discusses related theories of learning, including Information Processing, Behaviorism, Constructivism, and Humanism. Each provides a different perspective on how learning occurs.
The Stoics believed that true happiness comes from detachment from external things and controlling one's attitudes rather than circumstances. Key Stoic philosophers included Epictetus, who taught that we can only control our reactions, and Marcus Aurelius, the Roman emperor who found wisdom in accepting what is beyond our control. Stoicism teaches that by focusing on inner peace over pleasure or pain, one can be content under any conditions.
The document provides an overview of several topics in ethics, including:
1. It discusses philosophers like Aristotle, Epicurus, Epictetus and schools of thought like hedonism and Cyrenaic hedonism.
2. It defines key concepts in meta-ethics like descriptivism, cognitivism, and realism as well as applied ethics.
3. It summarizes the perspectives of different philosophers and schools of thought on topics like the good life, pleasure, self-mastery, and the pursuit of happiness.
Realism holds that reality exists independently of human minds and perceptions. It asserts that objects have intrinsic natures that are not dependent on beliefs, perceptions, or interpretations. According to realism, reality behaves in predictable and repeatable patterns regardless of human sensory experiences. The key principle of realism is independence - that reality exists on its own and is not contingent on the human mind. Realism favors an education system focused on teaching objective facts and truth through a standardized curriculum emphasizing sciences and the liberal arts.
Frameworks and principles behind our moral dispositionmarymaypaleyan
According to Aristotle, happiness is not pleasure, honor, or wealth, but rather an activity of the soul in accordance with virtue. Virtue is developed through habit, with virtuous actions becoming habitual over time until one naturally acts virtuously without conscious effort. For Kant, a good will is one that acts from duty and respects the moral law, motivated by a sense of obligation rather than any expected consequences. A good will treats humanity as an end in itself.
Virtue, Ethics and Morality in Business Essay
Theories Of Virtue Ethics
Virtue Ethics Theory Essay
Ethics
An Argument On Virtue Ethics Essay
Essay On Virtue Ethics
Virtue Essays
Understanding Virtue Ethics
Examples Of Virtue Ethics
Virtue Ethics : A Theory Of Morality
Virtue Ethics
Aristotle Virtue Ethics Essays
Essay on Virtue Ethics
Kant vs. Virtue Ethics Essay
Over Virtue Ethics Summary
Virtue Ethics Approach Essay examples
Virtue Ethics Essay
What Is Virtue Ethics
Virtue Ethics Research Paper
Example Of Virtue Ethics
The document discusses different philosophical theories about the source of ethics. It outlines views that ethics comes from human nature, that it involves living well according to virtue as described by Aristotle, and that it involves following a priori moral truths or duties as argued by Kant. The document provides details on Socrates, Aristotle, and Kant's perspectives, with Socrates arguing ethics comes from knowledge, Aristotle arguing it involves pursuing eudaimonia through virtue, and Kant arguing ethics follows from following categorical imperatives and duties.
The document discusses different philosophical perspectives on the concept of self. It explains that according to Socrates and Plato, the self is the soul rather than the physical body, and is immortal. Plato viewed the self as having three parts - the rational, spirited, and appetitive parts. Aristotle believed the essence is subsumed within phenomena. For Augustine, the self is defined by its relationship to God. Aquinas argued self-knowledge depends on experiences of the external world. Descartes defined the self as a thinking thing distinct from the body.
This document discusses perspectives in education and educational philosophy. It begins by defining philosophy and explaining how philosophers think about meaning and interpretation. It then outlines four major educational philosophies: Perennialism, which focuses on teaching enduring ideas and cultivating the intellect; Essentialism, which emphasizes transmitting a core body of knowledge; Progressivism, which emphasizes learning through experience and the interests of the student; and Reconstructionism/Critical Theory, which focuses on social reform and addressing real problems. The document also discusses related theories of learning, including Information Processing, Behaviorism, Constructivism, and Humanism. Each provides a different perspective on how learning occurs.
The Stoics believed that true happiness comes from detachment from external things and controlling one's attitudes rather than circumstances. Key Stoic philosophers included Epictetus, who taught that we can only control our reactions, and Marcus Aurelius, the Roman emperor who found wisdom in accepting what is beyond our control. Stoicism teaches that by focusing on inner peace over pleasure or pain, one can be content under any conditions.
This document discusses different philosophers' perspectives on the meaning of life and human limitations such as death. Socrates believed that knowing oneself is key to solving problems and that virtue, not education, is necessary for happiness. Plato thought contemplation allows the mind to commune with eternal ideas and is important for freeing humans from temporal confinement. He also believed the soul can attain pure knowledge after death when separated from the body. Aristotle analyzed change as a process of achieving one's essence or potential, and divided beings into living things that can change and nonliving things that cannot.
This document discusses different philosophers' perspectives on the meaning of life and human limitations such as death. Socrates believed that knowing oneself is key to solving problems and that virtue, not education, is necessary for happiness. Plato thought contemplation allows the mind to commune with eternal ideas and is important for freeing humans from temporal confinement. He also believed the soul can attain pure knowledge after death when separated from the body. Aristotle analyzed change as a process of becoming one's essence or potential and divided beings into living things that can change and nonliving things that cannot.
Human person are oriented toward their impending deathjeromecastelo
This document discusses different philosophers' perspectives on the meaning of life and human limitations such as death. Socrates believed that knowing oneself is key to solving problems and that virtue, not education, is necessary for happiness. Plato thought contemplation allows the mind to commune with eternal ideas and is important for freeing humans from temporal confinement. He also believed the soul can attain pure knowledge after death when separated from the body. Aristotle analyzed change as a process of achieving one's essence or potential, and divided beings into living things that can change and nonliving things that cannot.
1. For Aristotle, virtue ethics places importance on developing good moral character through practicing virtuous acts habitually. A virtuous person is one who exhibits moral excellence by choosing a mean between excess and deficiency in their actions.
2. Developing virtues requires practical wisdom to know how virtues apply in different situations. One becomes just by doing just acts, courageous through courageous acts, and so on.
3. For Aquinas, virtue ethics involves merging Aristotle's idea of achieving eudaimonia through virtue with Christian theology. An act is good if it contributes to our proper human end as defined by religion.
The document discusses various philosophers' perspectives on the concept of self. It begins by outlining Socrates' view that the soul is immortal and distinct from the physical body and realm. It then discusses Plato's idea of a tripartite soul consisting of reason, passion, and appetite. Next, it covers Aristotle's perspective that the soul is the essence of living things and humans possess a rational soul. The document then discusses views of other philosophers such as Augustine, Descartes, Locke, Hume, and Kant before concluding with sociological and anthropological theories regarding the social and cultural construction of self.
This document provides an overview of philosophy and its main branches. Philosophy is defined as the systematic, critical examination of how we think and act to become wiser. The five main branches discussed are: Metaphysics, which studies reality and existence; Epistemology, which is the study of knowledge; Logic, which examines valid reasoning; Ethics, which is the study of morality; and Aesthetics, which concerns beauty, art, and taste. Each branch seeks to answer fundamental questions about its subject area through philosophical inquiry and rational thought.
The ultimate aim of any philosophy or religion is supposed to be towards the welfare of the society showing a
genuine concern for humanity as a whole. However one has to accept the fact that unfortunately some of the
philosophies have nurtured themselves in such a way that they have emerged merely in an academic fashion
exhibiting the scholarship of the propounder and further utilizing the language in a verbose style. Similarly most
of the religions have also engrossed themselves in the rituals in an untiring manner which have taken foremost
position and toll, surpassing the real Spiritual aspect along with Philosophy. It is sad that so many centuries have
rolled down and still we are groping in darkness with same basic problems while as a contrast, Science with
empirical proofs has shown in all its branches notable progress. In fact all living beings strive for comfort and
further exert to crystallize the same into happines
The document discusses virtue ethics according to Aristotle. It explains that for Aristotle, eudaimonia or happiness is the chief good that is achieved through living virtuously according to reason. It describes the parts of the soul and their functions, with the rational part being responsible for choice and action. It discusses the virtues as a mean between excess and deficiency, and the role of habit and practical wisdom in developing virtuous character.
The document provides an overview of ancient Greek philosophy and views of human nature from Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. It summarizes that Socrates believed human nature involved reasoning and that people do not willingly do wrong. Plato saw human nature as depending on the tripartite soul and that people fulfill their nature based on the society they live in. Aristotle viewed humans as rational social animals that achieve success by fulfilling their telos/function through virtue.
Ethics Aristotle, Aquinas and Others....filipinogroup
Aristotle and St. Thomas were influential philosophers who contributed to ethics. Aristotle believed in excellence through virtuous actions and contemplation. He saw organisms developing teleologically towards perfection. Virtue is developed through habit, and happiness consists in exercising rationality through virtue. St. Thomas expanded on Aristotle using natural law theory. He saw the four cardinal virtues of prudence, temperance, justice and fortitude as the basis for pursuing happiness through living a virtuous life in accordance with human nature.
This document provides an overview of historical morality and ethics in Western philosophy. It discusses early Greek philosophers like Pythagoras, Democritus, and Anaxagoras. It then focuses on Socrates and his emphasis on virtue being knowledge. Post-Socratic schools are also summarized, including Cynicism emphasizing simplicity, Stoicism pursuing virtue and indifference, Hedonism viewing pleasure as the good, and Epicureanism seeing mental pleasures as superior to sensual ones.
Stoicism is an ancient Greek philosophy that emphasizes virtue and emotional detachment. Its core teachings include focusing on what is within one's control, detaching from negative emotions by controlling one's thoughts, and living virtuously according to nature. The Stoics believed that wisdom, courage, justice, and self-discipline were the four cardinal virtues. Practicing Stoicism can help one achieve equanimity and resilience in the face of life's difficulties. Zeno of Citium introduced Stoicism in Athens in the 3rd century BC, teaching followers to master their desires and responses to external events.
Stoicism is an ancient Greek philosophy that emphasizes virtue and emotional detachment. Its core teachings include focusing on what is within one's control, detaching from negative emotions, and maintaining composure through difficult situations. Stoicism aims to improve an individual's character through wisdom, courage, justice, temperance, and acceptance of life's unpredictability. Practicing Stoic principles such as self-mastery, mindfulness, and finding a mentor can help one achieve emotional resilience and find happiness.
Aristotle developed the philosophy of virtue ethics, which focuses on developing virtuous character traits through practice. According to Aristotle, practicing honesty, courage, justice and other virtues leads one to naturally make ethical choices when facing moral dilemmas. Aristotle identified two types of virtues - intellectual virtues like prudence and wisdom, and moral/ethical virtues developed through habit. He believed the intellectual virtues guide us to ethical ends, while ethical virtues direct our will. Aristotle taught that virtue is a golden mean between excess and deficiency, and that true happiness comes from living according to reason by cultivating virtue.
The document discusses different philosophers' views on the concept of self:
1. For Socrates, self-examination is essential to living an examined life. He questioned people's awareness of themselves and their virtues.
2. Plato added that the rational, spirited, and appetitive souls must be governed by reason.
3. Augustine and Aquinas viewed humans as composed of a mortal body and immortal soul, with the soul giving humans their essence.
4. Descartes defined self as mind/consciousness, separate from the extended body. Hume saw self as a bundle of impressions and ideas. Kant argued the mind organizes sense impressions.
5. Ryle rejected the
This document discusses different philosophical perspectives on the concept of the self. It begins by outlining the objectives of understanding the self from a philosophical lens and exploring key questions about the nature of the self. It then provides an overview of empiricism and rationalism as two approaches in philosophy. Several philosophers are discussed, including their distinct views on the self - whether it is composed of mind and body, a soul, or reducible to behaviors. In under 3 sentences, the document seeks to explain different philosophical perspectives on the concept of the self by outlining key questions about the nature of the self, discussing empiricism and rationalism, and summarizing various philosophers' distinct views on whether the self is composed of mind and body, a soul
This document discusses different philosophies and concepts of what constitutes a person. It begins by explaining that understanding human nature is fundamental to ethics. It then outlines several views: that all humans share the same basic anatomy; that humans are subject to the same psychological laws; that the Judeo-Christian view sees all humans as belonging to one family. Modern views see human nature as shaped by culture rather than having a universal essence. Marx saw human nature as shaped by history. Existentialism sees each person as uniquely remaking themselves. The document then discusses humans as rational organisms with both a body and soul. It defines a person as an individual human nature and says that character develops through one's actions and habits over time.
This document provides an introduction to philosophy. It defines philosophy as the love of wisdom and the study of fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language. The document outlines several key branches of philosophy, including metaphysics, ethics, epistemology, logic, aesthetics, political philosophy, and the philosophy of the human person. It also discusses influential ancient Greek philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle and their important contributions to different areas of philosophy.
The document discusses the field of ethics and moral philosophy. It defines ethics as the study of evaluating human actions and morality as concerning proper behavior. It outlines the three main areas of moral philosophy: metaethics investigates the basis of morality, normative ethics focuses on ethical standards, and applied ethics applies theory to practical issues. The document also examines the views of several philosophers on the importance of moral reflection, including Socrates advocating examining one's life, Aristotle linking happiness to fulfilling one's nature through reason, and Kant's notion of conscience as a process of moral self-judgment.
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptxCapitolTechU
Slides from a Capitol Technology University webinar held June 20, 2024. The webinar featured Dr. Donovan Wright, presenting on the Department of Defense Digital Transformation.
This document discusses different philosophers' perspectives on the meaning of life and human limitations such as death. Socrates believed that knowing oneself is key to solving problems and that virtue, not education, is necessary for happiness. Plato thought contemplation allows the mind to commune with eternal ideas and is important for freeing humans from temporal confinement. He also believed the soul can attain pure knowledge after death when separated from the body. Aristotle analyzed change as a process of achieving one's essence or potential, and divided beings into living things that can change and nonliving things that cannot.
This document discusses different philosophers' perspectives on the meaning of life and human limitations such as death. Socrates believed that knowing oneself is key to solving problems and that virtue, not education, is necessary for happiness. Plato thought contemplation allows the mind to commune with eternal ideas and is important for freeing humans from temporal confinement. He also believed the soul can attain pure knowledge after death when separated from the body. Aristotle analyzed change as a process of becoming one's essence or potential and divided beings into living things that can change and nonliving things that cannot.
Human person are oriented toward their impending deathjeromecastelo
This document discusses different philosophers' perspectives on the meaning of life and human limitations such as death. Socrates believed that knowing oneself is key to solving problems and that virtue, not education, is necessary for happiness. Plato thought contemplation allows the mind to commune with eternal ideas and is important for freeing humans from temporal confinement. He also believed the soul can attain pure knowledge after death when separated from the body. Aristotle analyzed change as a process of achieving one's essence or potential, and divided beings into living things that can change and nonliving things that cannot.
1. For Aristotle, virtue ethics places importance on developing good moral character through practicing virtuous acts habitually. A virtuous person is one who exhibits moral excellence by choosing a mean between excess and deficiency in their actions.
2. Developing virtues requires practical wisdom to know how virtues apply in different situations. One becomes just by doing just acts, courageous through courageous acts, and so on.
3. For Aquinas, virtue ethics involves merging Aristotle's idea of achieving eudaimonia through virtue with Christian theology. An act is good if it contributes to our proper human end as defined by religion.
The document discusses various philosophers' perspectives on the concept of self. It begins by outlining Socrates' view that the soul is immortal and distinct from the physical body and realm. It then discusses Plato's idea of a tripartite soul consisting of reason, passion, and appetite. Next, it covers Aristotle's perspective that the soul is the essence of living things and humans possess a rational soul. The document then discusses views of other philosophers such as Augustine, Descartes, Locke, Hume, and Kant before concluding with sociological and anthropological theories regarding the social and cultural construction of self.
This document provides an overview of philosophy and its main branches. Philosophy is defined as the systematic, critical examination of how we think and act to become wiser. The five main branches discussed are: Metaphysics, which studies reality and existence; Epistemology, which is the study of knowledge; Logic, which examines valid reasoning; Ethics, which is the study of morality; and Aesthetics, which concerns beauty, art, and taste. Each branch seeks to answer fundamental questions about its subject area through philosophical inquiry and rational thought.
The ultimate aim of any philosophy or religion is supposed to be towards the welfare of the society showing a
genuine concern for humanity as a whole. However one has to accept the fact that unfortunately some of the
philosophies have nurtured themselves in such a way that they have emerged merely in an academic fashion
exhibiting the scholarship of the propounder and further utilizing the language in a verbose style. Similarly most
of the religions have also engrossed themselves in the rituals in an untiring manner which have taken foremost
position and toll, surpassing the real Spiritual aspect along with Philosophy. It is sad that so many centuries have
rolled down and still we are groping in darkness with same basic problems while as a contrast, Science with
empirical proofs has shown in all its branches notable progress. In fact all living beings strive for comfort and
further exert to crystallize the same into happines
The document discusses virtue ethics according to Aristotle. It explains that for Aristotle, eudaimonia or happiness is the chief good that is achieved through living virtuously according to reason. It describes the parts of the soul and their functions, with the rational part being responsible for choice and action. It discusses the virtues as a mean between excess and deficiency, and the role of habit and practical wisdom in developing virtuous character.
The document provides an overview of ancient Greek philosophy and views of human nature from Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. It summarizes that Socrates believed human nature involved reasoning and that people do not willingly do wrong. Plato saw human nature as depending on the tripartite soul and that people fulfill their nature based on the society they live in. Aristotle viewed humans as rational social animals that achieve success by fulfilling their telos/function through virtue.
Ethics Aristotle, Aquinas and Others....filipinogroup
Aristotle and St. Thomas were influential philosophers who contributed to ethics. Aristotle believed in excellence through virtuous actions and contemplation. He saw organisms developing teleologically towards perfection. Virtue is developed through habit, and happiness consists in exercising rationality through virtue. St. Thomas expanded on Aristotle using natural law theory. He saw the four cardinal virtues of prudence, temperance, justice and fortitude as the basis for pursuing happiness through living a virtuous life in accordance with human nature.
This document provides an overview of historical morality and ethics in Western philosophy. It discusses early Greek philosophers like Pythagoras, Democritus, and Anaxagoras. It then focuses on Socrates and his emphasis on virtue being knowledge. Post-Socratic schools are also summarized, including Cynicism emphasizing simplicity, Stoicism pursuing virtue and indifference, Hedonism viewing pleasure as the good, and Epicureanism seeing mental pleasures as superior to sensual ones.
Stoicism is an ancient Greek philosophy that emphasizes virtue and emotional detachment. Its core teachings include focusing on what is within one's control, detaching from negative emotions by controlling one's thoughts, and living virtuously according to nature. The Stoics believed that wisdom, courage, justice, and self-discipline were the four cardinal virtues. Practicing Stoicism can help one achieve equanimity and resilience in the face of life's difficulties. Zeno of Citium introduced Stoicism in Athens in the 3rd century BC, teaching followers to master their desires and responses to external events.
Stoicism is an ancient Greek philosophy that emphasizes virtue and emotional detachment. Its core teachings include focusing on what is within one's control, detaching from negative emotions, and maintaining composure through difficult situations. Stoicism aims to improve an individual's character through wisdom, courage, justice, temperance, and acceptance of life's unpredictability. Practicing Stoic principles such as self-mastery, mindfulness, and finding a mentor can help one achieve emotional resilience and find happiness.
Aristotle developed the philosophy of virtue ethics, which focuses on developing virtuous character traits through practice. According to Aristotle, practicing honesty, courage, justice and other virtues leads one to naturally make ethical choices when facing moral dilemmas. Aristotle identified two types of virtues - intellectual virtues like prudence and wisdom, and moral/ethical virtues developed through habit. He believed the intellectual virtues guide us to ethical ends, while ethical virtues direct our will. Aristotle taught that virtue is a golden mean between excess and deficiency, and that true happiness comes from living according to reason by cultivating virtue.
The document discusses different philosophers' views on the concept of self:
1. For Socrates, self-examination is essential to living an examined life. He questioned people's awareness of themselves and their virtues.
2. Plato added that the rational, spirited, and appetitive souls must be governed by reason.
3. Augustine and Aquinas viewed humans as composed of a mortal body and immortal soul, with the soul giving humans their essence.
4. Descartes defined self as mind/consciousness, separate from the extended body. Hume saw self as a bundle of impressions and ideas. Kant argued the mind organizes sense impressions.
5. Ryle rejected the
This document discusses different philosophical perspectives on the concept of the self. It begins by outlining the objectives of understanding the self from a philosophical lens and exploring key questions about the nature of the self. It then provides an overview of empiricism and rationalism as two approaches in philosophy. Several philosophers are discussed, including their distinct views on the self - whether it is composed of mind and body, a soul, or reducible to behaviors. In under 3 sentences, the document seeks to explain different philosophical perspectives on the concept of the self by outlining key questions about the nature of the self, discussing empiricism and rationalism, and summarizing various philosophers' distinct views on whether the self is composed of mind and body, a soul
This document discusses different philosophies and concepts of what constitutes a person. It begins by explaining that understanding human nature is fundamental to ethics. It then outlines several views: that all humans share the same basic anatomy; that humans are subject to the same psychological laws; that the Judeo-Christian view sees all humans as belonging to one family. Modern views see human nature as shaped by culture rather than having a universal essence. Marx saw human nature as shaped by history. Existentialism sees each person as uniquely remaking themselves. The document then discusses humans as rational organisms with both a body and soul. It defines a person as an individual human nature and says that character develops through one's actions and habits over time.
This document provides an introduction to philosophy. It defines philosophy as the love of wisdom and the study of fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language. The document outlines several key branches of philosophy, including metaphysics, ethics, epistemology, logic, aesthetics, political philosophy, and the philosophy of the human person. It also discusses influential ancient Greek philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle and their important contributions to different areas of philosophy.
The document discusses the field of ethics and moral philosophy. It defines ethics as the study of evaluating human actions and morality as concerning proper behavior. It outlines the three main areas of moral philosophy: metaethics investigates the basis of morality, normative ethics focuses on ethical standards, and applied ethics applies theory to practical issues. The document also examines the views of several philosophers on the importance of moral reflection, including Socrates advocating examining one's life, Aristotle linking happiness to fulfilling one's nature through reason, and Kant's notion of conscience as a process of moral self-judgment.
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptxCapitolTechU
Slides from a Capitol Technology University webinar held June 20, 2024. The webinar featured Dr. Donovan Wright, presenting on the Department of Defense Digital Transformation.
How Barcodes Can Be Leveraged Within Odoo 17Celine George
In this presentation, we will explore how barcodes can be leveraged within Odoo 17 to streamline our manufacturing processes. We will cover the configuration steps, how to utilize barcodes in different manufacturing scenarios, and the overall benefits of implementing this technology.
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...EduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher, Director of Education and Skills at the OECD presents at the launch of PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Minds, Creative Schools on 18 June 2024.
How to Manage Reception Report in Odoo 17Celine George
A business may deal with both sales and purchases occasionally. They buy things from vendors and then sell them to their customers. Such dealings can be confusing at times. Because multiple clients may inquire about the same product at the same time, after purchasing those products, customers must be assigned to them. Odoo has a tool called Reception Report that can be used to complete this assignment. By enabling this, a reception report comes automatically after confirming a receipt, from which we can assign products to orders.
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsSteve Thomason
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
This presentation was provided by Racquel Jemison, Ph.D., Christina MacLaughlin, Ph.D., and Paulomi Majumder. Ph.D., all of the American Chemical Society, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
11. Stoicism
Stoicism originated as a Hellenistic
philosophy, founded in Athens by Zeno of
Citium (modern day Cyprus), c. 300 B.C.E.
It was influenced by Socrates and the
Cynics, and it engaged in vigorous debates
with the Skeptics, the Academics, and the
Epicureans.
The name comes from the Stoa Poikile, or
painted porch, an open market in Athens
where the original Stoics used to meet and
teach philosophy.
12. Stoicism
Stoicism is a type of eudaimonic virtue ethics, asserting that
the practice of virtue is both necessary and sufficient to
achieve happiness (in the eudaimonic sense).
Eudaimonia was the term that meant a life worth living,
often translated nowadays as “happiness” in the broad
sense, or more appropriately, flourishing.
However, the Stoics also recognized the existence of
“indifferents” (to eudaimonia) that could nevertheless be
preferred (for example, health, wealth, education) or
dispreferred (for example, sickness, poverty, ignorance),
because they had (respectively, positive or negative)
planning value with respect to the ability to practice virtue.
13. Stoicism
Man is a part of the universal order, a spark of the divine
fire, a small universe (microcosm) reflecting the great
universe (macrocosm).
Hence it behooves him to act in harmony with the purpose
of the universe, to seek to fit his own purposes into the
larger design envisaged by the divine purpose, to reach the
highest possible measure of perfection.
In order to do this, he must put his own soul in order;
reason should rule in him as reason rules the world. H e
ought to subordinate his w ill to the w ill of the world,
submit to the law of the universe, take his place in the great
order, and strive to do consciously, intelligently, and
voluntarily that which it is his office to do as a part of the
cosmos.
14. Stoicism
To live according to nature, is, for a human being, to act in
conformity with reason, the logos.
This is the full meaning of the Stoic injunction that we live
according to nature.
For the Stoic ethics, virtue is the highest good and the
highest happiness, for only a virtuous life can be a happy
life.
To live thus is to realize one’s self, and to realize one’s true
self is to serve the purposes of universal reason and to work
for universal ends.
The Stoic ethical ideal implies a universal society of rational
beings with the same rights; for reason is the same in all,
and all are parts of the same world-soul.
15. Stoicism
The same conclusions may be reached by a consideration of the
natural impulses of man; for, according to the Stoics, the universal
logos expresses itself in the lower instincts no less than in human
reason.
Every being strives to preserve itself; self-preservation, not
pleasure, is the goal of impulse, and pleasure is merely a
concomitant of the successful realization of impulse.
Yet individual self-preservation is not the only goal, for there is in-
herent in all living creatures an instinct to preserve the species, a
desire for something beyond themselves.
With the development of reason man comes to regard his rational
nature as his true self, and finds-satisfaction in the perfection of
reason and the promotion of rational purposes everywhere.
16. Stoicism
What he loves in him self he cannot but love in others. Theoretical
speculation is not, for Stoicism, an end in itself; reason is valued highly
only because it reveals to us our duty.
Virtue is the only good and vice the only evil, all else is indifferent.
According to the Stoic ideal, health, life, honor, wealth, rank, power,
friendship, success are not in themselves good; nor are death, disease,
disgrace, poverty, humble birth in themselves evil.
Neither pleasure nor happiness is an absolute good; either may result
from action but neither should be made an end.
The attainment of such things as pleasure and happiness is not in our
power; though the attitude we adopt toward them is in our control. Their
value depends on what use we make of them, on their bearing upon our
character; in themselves they are nothing. Virtue alone is intrinsically
worthwhile, and it alone can make man truly happy.
17. Stoicism
A truly virtuous act is one that is consciously directed
toward the highest purpose or end, and is performed with
conscious knowledge of moral principles.
Thus, virtuous conduct implies complete and certain
knowledge of the good and a conscious purpose, on the
part of the doer, to realize the supreme good.
To act unconsciously and without knowledge is not virtue. If
we look at the matter in this way, virtue is one, for here
everything depends on the disposition, on the good will: a
man either has it or he has it not; there is no middle ground;
he is either a wise man or a fool. In this sense, where one
virtue is, all others are. The virtues are expressions of one
and the same disposition and, therefore, inseparably
connected with one another.
18. Stoicism
The doctrine of the unity of virtue is the typically Stoic view
which Chrysippus alone among the Stoics did not accept.
He held that virtue is not natural in man, but is acquired by
practice and through instruction.
In as much as virtue implies complete knowledge, only a
mature man can possess it.
The assumption underlying this view is that a man will act
according to his judgment, that he will naturally strive for
what appears good to him , and avoid what is evil. Hence,
evil conduct is the result of wrong judgment, or false
opinion: the Stoics sometimes regard evil as the cause,
sometimes as the effect, of the passions or immoderate
impulses.
19. Stoicism
There are four such passions: pleasure, desire, grief, and fear.
A false judgment of a present good arouses—or is aroused by—pleasure; of a future
good, desire; of a present evil, grief or pain; of a future evil, fear.
All these passions and their many variations are diseases of the soul which it is our
business, not merely to moderate, but to eradicate, since they are irrational,
exaggerated feelings—the result of false opinion.
Apathy or freedom from passion is, accordingly, the Stoic ideal. To attain it, complete
knowledge is necessary and such knowledge is connected with strength of will or
character.
To be free from passion means to be brave and temperate, and it lies within the power
of the individual him self to decide whether he will obey the moral law or not.
The will of man is, in this sense, free. It has been said that the Stoics in their metaphysics
teach determinism, and in their ethics free will; but the moral freedom postulated by the
Stoics is not really incompatible with the metaphysics of determinism.
20. Stoicism
As influential as Zeno of Citium has been, nothing that he wrote has survived to modern day.
Around 300 BC in Athens, he was one of the most revered teachers. His claim to fame is that he
founded Stoicism, a school of philosophy chiefly interested in how we ought to live.
Our understanding of his approach to Stoicism, then, comes from second-hand sources. While the
philosophy has continued to evolve, with popular interpretations coming from great Romans like
Seneca and Marcus Aurelius, much of it grew on the roots Zeno nurtured.
He divided his thinking into three categories: logic, which he equated with the study of things like
knowledge, perception, and thought; physics, which was his approach to nature and science; and
ethics, which concerned itself with the daily conduct of living and being.
Out of these three, however, it was ethics that he was primarily interested in, seeing the other two
categories as means – a framework to support and carry his conclusions.
Zeno’s ideas were built on older methodologies of the Cynics and the thinking of Socrates, but rather
than lean toward one side or the other, he mixed and matched as he saw fit.
Naturally, there is some disagreement about what exactly Zeno’s system laid out and the finer details
of his approach, but in broad strokes, we can paint a fairly accurate picture.1
It’s easy to get caught in the deeper mysteries of reality, and in the process, we sometimes forget to
pay attention to what it actually means to live as a matter of daily conduct. The Stoics, like Zeno,
showed how we can close this gap by:
• Living in accordance with our nature
• Seeing virtue as the source of goodness
• Having a neutral valuation of the world
Today, the word stoic connotates resilience and fortitude, but there is more to it than that.
21. Stoicism
Living in Accordance With Our Nature
Currently, science studies the natural world and tries to pinpoint it as either a means to other
ends, like controlling and predicting our surroundings, or simply as a thing of value in itself.
In a Stoic worldview, these reasons may be good enough, and they can fit into the broader
framework, but they stop short of the primary reason for studying nature and its phenomena: to
better understand ourselves and how our personal actions fit into the cosmic dance.
As beings of evolution, we have aspects of nature embedded into us. We have inclinations
toward both change and harmony, competition and cooperation, pursuits and comforts.
Now, of course, certain traits have a stronger pull in some people than others, and when we are
young, many of these traits are raw, but as we age and as we experience, we can use reason
to move us away from instinct toward an understanding that accords with the world.
If we follow this path of reason, what we are often left with are core motivations that drive us to
pursue our interests, core motivations that move us to take care of those around us, and core
motivations to overcome different challenges that life throws our way.
The key thing to note here is that the Stoics were against blind romanticism, where feelings and
pleasures guide what we do. No, Zeno taught that we use experience and then refine it with
reason as a way to harmonize with the world and that’s what should guide us.
Once a certain refinement has been reached, then its pull works like a compass, one we
shouldn’t fight if it’s telling us that we should go in the other direction when we are stuck.
At any point in life, there is a larger wave around our body that gives form to many of our
characteristics, and it’s on us to both ride this wave and to let it flow through us as we do.
22. Stoicism
Seeing Virtue as the Source of Goodness
Once we have a clear understanding of our relationship to both our nature and the broader nature, we are
absolved from all of the uncertainties that we are likely to face but one.
This brings us to the core of the Stoic worldview: their ethics. At the end of the day, very little of this matters
unless, in some way, we change our actions, conducts, and ways of being.
While using reason and experience to align ourselves with our surroundings is a start, it’s not the end. There
are still conflicts that we are likely to face, namely those that challenge us, where the broader nature is putting
undue stress on our own personal experience.
When, for example, we get hurt, or when reality fails to meet our expectations, or when we lose people we
care about, there is clearly a conflict, and harmonizing things isn’t easy.
Here Zeno would say that any action or conduct is right if it is simply good. And what does he mean by good?
Well, something is good if it is virtuous: when you use your reason to change what it is in your control (which
is your reaction) and let go of what isn’t (a problem).
When you put virtue at the center, as the most meaningful thing to strive toward, you take full responsibility for
how you experience reality because virtue is born within you; not in the outside world. If something is wrong,
it’s because you are not matching your responsibility.
It may be true that people are treating you unfairly, or that it wasn’t your fault, or that life in general is just hard,
but once a non-reversible event has occurred, you can do one of two things: fight it or harmonize with it. And if
you can’t change the world, the only way to harmonize with it is to change your reaction: to create goodness
by doing the virtuous thing.
The better your reaction, the more virtuous of a life you live, and the more good you create.
23. Stoicism
Having A Neutral Valuation of the World
The importance of virtue highlights the value of managing our internal reality: that what is good
and true comes from looking inward. Fair enough, but what about the outside world?
If the only source of goodness is the part of us in charge of managing our reaction to outside
events, then what exactly is the point of caring about anything in the world surrounding us?
This question is where Zeno and his followers diverged away from the Cynics, a different brand
of philosophers, who Zeno built his ideas on. The Cynics claimed that the outside world didn’t
matter at all. As long as you kept your internal world in check, you were fine.
The Stoics, however, argued that it does matter. The objects we experience and live around
may not carry positive or negative values in themselves, but they play an important role.
Everything in the outside world is neutral. In itself, it’s neither good nor bad; it simply is. That
said, the way our internal virtue and goodness interacts with this world is of consequence. For
example, it’s more preferable to avoid sickness by being cautious than to walk into it.
Striving for health and wealth and community, things that help to preserve us, are natural and
preferable, as long as we don’t confuse them as the source of our virtue and goodness.
Once we have refined our innate reason, and once we pursue the core motivations that it has
imbued in us, not interacting with this world of external objects would be an act against the
harmony. It would be creating a conflict where there otherwise would not be one.
Many Stoics that lived after Zeno had a different relationship with the external reality and its
demands, making a case for things like duty, but they all agreed that it plays a key role.
24. Stoicism
All You Need to Know
It’s a simple idea: control what you can and let go of what you can’t. But it takes more than just
saying it and knowing it for it to truly kick into effect in the day to day business of living.
Zeno of Citium, the first Stoic, may not have left behind a perfectly clear system for us to study,
but there is enough there to guide us toward our own variations of the framework.
There are three key things we can learn from him:
1. Live in accordance with nature. By using our experience to study nature and then refining this
experience with reason, we can harmonize our drives with the broader reality around us. We are
a very small part of the cosmic dance, one that moves through us, and it’s our job to ensure that
we are living in ways that are honest to it.
2. See virtue as the source of goodness. If there is a conflict between our experience and the
broader nature, we can either fight against it or seek to harmonize with it. It’s our responsibility to
adjust our reactions to things once they have occurred and once they are outside our control.
Virtue and goodness are born from how well we do this.
3. Have a neutral valuation of the world. Things that exist externally aren’t good or bad in
themselves; they are neutral. Nonetheless, even though virtue is born within and goodness can
only be created internally, the external world does have a role to play. Health and wealth and
community are preferable to the alternatives.
We may have our own terminology for it, but something like virtue is inherent in all of our
conceptual model of reality. Our job is simply to remember what we already know.
Being stoic has a lot to do with being resilient and strong, yes, but it’s also a way of life.