Static test techniques provide a powerful way to improve the quality and productivity of software development. This chapter describes static test techniques, including reviews, and provides an overview of how they are conducted. The fundamental objective of static testing is to improve the quality of software work products by assisting engineers to recognize and fix their own defects early in the software development process. While static testing techniques will not solve all the problems, they are enormously effective. Static techniques can improve both quality and productivity by impressive factors. Static testing is not magic and it should not be considered a replacement for dynamic testing, but all software organizations should consider using reviews in all major aspects of their work including requirements, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. Static analysis tools implement automated checks, e.g. on code.
YAHDI SANDRA
11453104752
Program Studi S1 Sistem Informasi
Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
http://sif.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://fst.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://www.uin-suska.ac.id/
YAHDI SANDRA
11453104752
Program Studi S1 Sistem Informasi
Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
http://sif.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://fst.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://www.uin-suska.ac.id/
Static techniques can improve both quality and productivity by impressive factors. Static testing is not magic and it should not be considered a replacement for dynamic testing, but all software organizations should consider using reviews in all major aspects of their work including requirements, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. Static analysis tools implement automated checks, e.g. on code
This chapter describes static test techniques, including reviews, and provides an overviewof how they are conducted. The fundamental objective of static testing is to improve the quality of softwarework products by assisting engineers to recognize and fix their own defects early in the softwaredevelopment process. While static testing techniques will not solve all the problems, they areenormously effective. Static techniques can improve both quality and productivity by impressive factors.Static testing is not magic and it should not be considered a replacement for dynamic testing, but allsoftware organizations should consider using reviews in all major aspects of their work includingrequirements, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. Static analysis tools implementautomated checks, e.g. on code
Static test techniques provide a powerful way to improve the quality and productivity of software development.
This chapter describes static test techniques, including reviews, and provides an overview of how they are conducted
Static test techniques provide a powerful way to improve the quality and productivity of software development. This chapter describes static test techniques, including reviews, and provides an overview of how they are conducted
abdurrahimradhin Program Studi S1 Sistem Informasi Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
http://sif.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://fst.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://www.uin-suska.ac.id/
Referensi ke Graham et.al (2006)
Topics: Reviews and the test process, Types of review, static analysis
To know more about
Offer- http://mazenet-chennai.in/mazenet-offers.html
Syllabus- http://www.mazenet-chennai.in/software-testing-training-in-chennai.html
Slide share: http://www.slideshare.net/mazenet_solution/presentations
For more events- http://mazenet-chennai.in/mazenet-events.html
All videos- https://www.youtube.com/c/Mazenetsolution
Facebook- https://www.facebook.com/Mazenet.IT.Solution/
Twitter- https://twitter.com/Maze_net
Mail us : marketing@mazenetsolution.com
Contact: 9629728714
Testing throughout the software life cycle & statistic techniquesNovika Damai Yanti
CATEGORIES OF TEST DESIGN TECHNIQUES
Recall reasons that both specification-based (black-box) and structure-based (white-box) approaches to test case design are useful, and list the common techniques for each. (K1)
Static techniques can improve both quality and productivity by impressive factors. Static testing is not magic and it should not be considered a replacement for dynamic testing, but all software organizations should consider using reviews in all major aspects of their work including requirements, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. Static analysis tools implement automated checks, e.g. on code
This chapter describes static test techniques, including reviews, and provides an overviewof how they are conducted. The fundamental objective of static testing is to improve the quality of softwarework products by assisting engineers to recognize and fix their own defects early in the softwaredevelopment process. While static testing techniques will not solve all the problems, they areenormously effective. Static techniques can improve both quality and productivity by impressive factors.Static testing is not magic and it should not be considered a replacement for dynamic testing, but allsoftware organizations should consider using reviews in all major aspects of their work includingrequirements, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. Static analysis tools implementautomated checks, e.g. on code
Static test techniques provide a powerful way to improve the quality and productivity of software development.
This chapter describes static test techniques, including reviews, and provides an overview of how they are conducted
Static test techniques provide a powerful way to improve the quality and productivity of software development. This chapter describes static test techniques, including reviews, and provides an overview of how they are conducted
abdurrahimradhin Program Studi S1 Sistem Informasi Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
http://sif.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://fst.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://www.uin-suska.ac.id/
Referensi ke Graham et.al (2006)
Topics: Reviews and the test process, Types of review, static analysis
To know more about
Offer- http://mazenet-chennai.in/mazenet-offers.html
Syllabus- http://www.mazenet-chennai.in/software-testing-training-in-chennai.html
Slide share: http://www.slideshare.net/mazenet_solution/presentations
For more events- http://mazenet-chennai.in/mazenet-events.html
All videos- https://www.youtube.com/c/Mazenetsolution
Facebook- https://www.facebook.com/Mazenet.IT.Solution/
Twitter- https://twitter.com/Maze_net
Mail us : marketing@mazenetsolution.com
Contact: 9629728714
Testing throughout the software life cycle & statistic techniquesNovika Damai Yanti
CATEGORIES OF TEST DESIGN TECHNIQUES
Recall reasons that both specification-based (black-box) and structure-based (white-box) approaches to test case design are useful, and list the common techniques for each. (K1)
This is chapter 3 of ISTQB Advance Test Manager certification. This presentation helps aspirants understand and prepare the content of the certification.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
2. Static test techniques provide a powerful way to improve the quality and
productivity of software development. Static techniques can improve both quality
and productivity by impressive factors. Static testing is not magic and it should not be
considered a replacement for dynamic testing, but all software organizations should
consider using reviews in all major aspects of their work including requirements,
design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. Static analysis tools implement
automated checks, e.g. on code.
3. REVIEWS AND THE TEST
PROCESS
Studies have shown that as a result of reviews, a significant increase in productivity and
product quality can be achieved [Gilb and Graham, 1993], [van Veenendaal, 1999]. Reducing the
number of defects early in the product life cycle also means that less time has to be spent on testing
and maintenance. To summarize, the use of static testing, e.g. reviews, on software work products has
various advantages:
– Since static testing can start early in the life cycle, early feedback on quality issues can be established, e.g. an
early validation of user requirements and not just late in the life cycle during acceptance testing.
– By detecting defects at an early stage, rework costs are most often relatively low and thus a relatively cheap
improvement of the quality of software products can be achieved.
– Since rework effort is substantially reduced, development productivity figures are likely to increase.
– The evaluation by a team has the additional advantage that there is an exchange of information between the
participants.
– Static tests contribute to an increased awareness of quality issues.
4. REVIEW PROCESS
Reviews vary from very informal to formal (i.e. well
structured and regulated). Although inspection is perhaps the most
documented and formal review technique, it is certainly not the
only one. The formality of a review process is related to factors
such as the maturity of the development process, any legal or
regulatory requirements or the need for an audit trail. In practice
the informal review is perhaps the most common type of review.
Informal reviews are applied at various times during the early
stages in the life cycle of a document. A two-person team can
conduct an informal review, as the author can ask a colleague to
review a document or code. In later stages these reviews often
involve more people and a meeting. This normally involves peers of
the author, who try to find defects in the document under review
and discuss these defects in a review meeting. The goal is to help
the author and to improve the quality of the document. Informal
reviews come in various shapes and forms, but all have one
characteristic in common – they are not documented.
5. a. Phases of a formal review
In contrast to informal reviews, formal reviews follow a formal process. A typical
formal review process consists of six main steps:
– Planning
– Kick-off
– Preparation
– Review meeting
– Rework
– Follow-up.
6. • Planning
Although more and other entry criteria can be applied, the following can be regarded
as the minimum set for performing the entry check:
– A short check of a product sample by the moderator (or expert) does not reveal a
large number of major defects. For example, after 30 minutes of checking, no more
than 3 major defects are found on a single page or fewer than 10 major defects in
total in a set of 5 pages.
– The document to be reviewed is available with line numbers.
– The document has been cleaned up by running any automated checks that apply.
– References needed for the inspection are stable and available.
– The document author is prepared to join the review team and feels confident with
the quality of the document.
7. Within reviews the following focuses can be identified:
– focus on higher-level documents, e.g. does the design comply to the
requirements;
– focus on standards, e.g. internal consistency, clarity, naming conventions,
templates;
– focus on related documents at the same level, e.g. interfaces between soft ware
functions;
– focus on usage, e.g. for testability or maintainability.
8. The author may raise additional specific roles and questions
that have to be addressed. The moderator has the option to also
fulfill a role, alongside the task of being a review leader.
Checking the document improves the moderator's ability to
lead the meeting, because it ensures better understanding.
Furthermore, it improves the review efficiency because the
moderator replaces an engineer that would otherwise have to
check the document and attend the meeting. It is
recommended that the moderator take the role of checking
compliance to standards, since this tends to be a highly
objective role, which leads to less discussion of the defects
found.
9. • Kick off
An optional step in a review procedure is a kick-off meeting.
The goal of this meeting is to get everybody on the same wavelength
regarding the document under review and to commit to the time that
will be spent on checking. Also the result of the entry check and defined
exit criteria are discussed in case of a more formal review. In general a
kick-off is highly recommended since there is a strong positive effect of
a kick-off meeting on the motivation of reviewers and thus the
effectiveness of the review process. At customer sites, we have
measured results up to 70% more major defects found per page as a
result of performing a kick-off, [van Veenendaal and van der Zwan,
2000]
10. Preparation
A critical success factor for a thorough preparation is the number of pages checked
per hour. This is called the checking rate. The optimum checking rate is the result of
a mix of factors, including the type of document, its complexity, the number of
related documents and the experience of the reviewer. Usually the checking rate is
in the range of five to ten pages per hour, but may be much less for formal
inspection, e.g. one page per hour. During preparation, participants should not
exceed this criterion. By collecting data and measuring the review process,
company-specific criteria for checking rate and document size (see planning phase)
can be set, preferably specific to a document type.
11. • Review meeting
Every defect and its severity should be logged. The participant who identifies the defect proposes the severity. Severity classes
could be:
– Critical: defects will cause downstream damage; the scope and impact of the defect is beyond the document under
inspection.
– Major, defects could cause a downstream effect (e.g. a fault in a design can result in an error in the implementation).
– Minor, defects are not likely to cause downstream damage (e.g. non-compli ance with the standards and templates). ,
At the end of the meeting, a decision on the document under review has to be made by the participants, sometimes based on
formal exit criteria. The most important exit criterion is the average number of critical and/or major defects found per page
(e.g. no more than three critical/major defects per page). If the number of defects found per page exceeds a certain level, the
document must be reviewed again, after it has been reworked. If the document complies with the exit criteria, the document
will be checked during follow-up by the moderator or one or more participants. Subsequently, the document can leave the
review process. If a project is under pressure, the moderator will sometimes be forced to skip re-reviews and exit with a defect-
prone document. Setting, and agreeing, quantified exit level criteria helps the moderator to make firm decisions at all times.
12. • Rework
Based on the defects detected, the author will improve the
document under review step by step. Not every defect that
is found leads to rework. It is the author's responsibility to
judge if a defect has to be fixed. If nothing is done about an
issue for a certain reason, it should be reported to at least
indicate that the author has considered the issue. Changes
that are made to the document should be easy to identify
during follow-up. Therefore the author has to indicate
where changes are made (e.g. using 'Track changes' in word-
processing software).
13. Follow-up
The moderator is responsible for ensuring that satisfactory
actions have been taken on all (logged) defects, process
improvement suggestions and change requests. Although
the moderator checks to make sure that the author has
taken action on all known defects, it is not necessary for
the moderator to check all the corrections in detail. If it is
decided that all participants will check the updated
document, the moderator takes care of the distribution
and collects the feedback. For more formal review types
the moderator checks for compliance to the exit criteria.
14. Referensi
Graham, d., et al. 2006. Foundation of Software Testing: ISTQB certification
London, UK: International Thomson Business Press
http://www.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://sif.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://fst.uin-
suska.ac.id