YAHDI SANDRA
11453104752
Program Studi S1 Sistem Informasi
Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
http://sif.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://fst.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://www.uin-suska.ac.id/
Static test techniques provide a powerful way to improve the quality and productivity of software development. This chapter describes static test techniques, including reviews, and provides an overview of how they are conducted. The fundamental objective of static testing is to improve the quality of software work products by assisting engineers to recognize and fix their own defects early in the software development process. While static testing techniques will not solve all the problems, they are enormously effective. Static techniques can improve both quality and productivity by impressive factors. Static testing is not magic and it should not be considered a replacement for dynamic testing, but all software organizations should consider using reviews in all major aspects of their work including requirements, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. Static analysis tools implement automated checks, e.g. on code.
Formal reviews follow a six step process: 1) Planning, 2) Kick-off, 3) Preparation where reviewers identify defects individually, 4) Review meeting where defects are logged and discussed, 5) Rework by the author to address defects, and 6) Follow-up by the moderator to ensure defects were addressed. Key roles include the moderator who leads the process, author of the document, reviewers who identify defects, and scribe who logs defects discussed.
Static techniques provide powerful ways to improve software quality and productivity. Static testing finds defects early by reviewing work products like requirements, design, code, and documentation. Reviews can be informal or formal, following a defined process. Formal reviews typically involve planning, a kickoff meeting, individual preparation, a group review meeting, reworking by the author, and follow up by a moderator. The goal is to improve quality by identifying and fixing defects early in development.
Static techniques such as reviews can improve both quality and productivity in software development. Static testing examines software work products like requirements and design documents manually or with tools before execution, finding defects early. Dynamic testing executes software with test cases. The two techniques are complementary, as static testing finds defects like missing requirements or design flaws while dynamic testing finds failures from execution. Using static testing from early in the development lifecycle provides advantages like early feedback, low rework costs, increased productivity, and greater awareness of quality issues.
This document discusses static testing techniques, including reviews. It describes the review process and roles involved in reviews. The review process consists of six main phases: planning, entry check, kick-off meeting, preparation, review meeting, rework, and follow-up. Key roles include the moderator, author, scribe, and reviewers. The goal of reviews is to improve quality and productivity by finding defects early.
YAHDI SANDRA
11453104752
Program Studi S1 Sistem Informasi
Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
http://sif.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://fst.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://www.uin-suska.ac.id/
Static test techniques provide a powerful way to improve the quality and productivity of software development. This chapter describes static test techniques, including reviews, and provides an overview of how they are conducted. The fundamental objective of static testing is to improve the quality of software work products by assisting engineers to recognize and fix their own defects early in the software development process. While static testing techniques will not solve all the problems, they are enormously effective. Static techniques can improve both quality and productivity by impressive factors. Static testing is not magic and it should not be considered a replacement for dynamic testing, but all software organizations should consider using reviews in all major aspects of their work including requirements, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. Static analysis tools implement automated checks, e.g. on code.
Formal reviews follow a six step process: 1) Planning, 2) Kick-off, 3) Preparation where reviewers identify defects individually, 4) Review meeting where defects are logged and discussed, 5) Rework by the author to address defects, and 6) Follow-up by the moderator to ensure defects were addressed. Key roles include the moderator who leads the process, author of the document, reviewers who identify defects, and scribe who logs defects discussed.
Static techniques provide powerful ways to improve software quality and productivity. Static testing finds defects early by reviewing work products like requirements, design, code, and documentation. Reviews can be informal or formal, following a defined process. Formal reviews typically involve planning, a kickoff meeting, individual preparation, a group review meeting, reworking by the author, and follow up by a moderator. The goal is to improve quality by identifying and fixing defects early in development.
Static techniques such as reviews can improve both quality and productivity in software development. Static testing examines software work products like requirements and design documents manually or with tools before execution, finding defects early. Dynamic testing executes software with test cases. The two techniques are complementary, as static testing finds defects like missing requirements or design flaws while dynamic testing finds failures from execution. Using static testing from early in the development lifecycle provides advantages like early feedback, low rework costs, increased productivity, and greater awareness of quality issues.
This document discusses static testing techniques, including reviews. It describes the review process and roles involved in reviews. The review process consists of six main phases: planning, entry check, kick-off meeting, preparation, review meeting, rework, and follow-up. Key roles include the moderator, author, scribe, and reviewers. The goal of reviews is to improve quality and productivity by finding defects early.
Static techniques can improve both quality and productivity by impressive factors. Static testing is not magic and it should not be considered a replacement for dynamic testing, but all software organizations should consider using reviews in all major aspects of their work including requirements, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. Static analysis tools implement automated checks, e.g. on code
The document discusses static testing techniques, specifically reviews. It describes the review process, which typically involves 6 phases: planning, kick-off, preparation, review meeting, rework, and follow-up. Key roles in a review include the moderator, author, scribe, and reviewers. The moderator leads the process, while the author's goal is to improve the document. Reviews can find defects early and improve quality and productivity.
This document discusses software inspections as a way to improve quality. It describes the benefits of inspections in finding defects early. Inspections typically involve a moderator, author, reader, recorder and inspectors reviewing requirements, design or code documents. Key aspects of inspections include planning, overview, preparation, meeting, analysis and rework. Guiding principles are to critique products not people and find problems, not fix them, during reviews. Record keeping of found defects is important for process improvement. Providing training and building inspections into schedules can help make them most effective.
Static testing involves examining a program's code and documentation without executing the code. It aims to improve quality by finding errors early. Techniques include informal reviews with minimal documentation; formal reviews following steps like planning, preparation, and follow-up; technical reviews of specifications; walkthroughs where authors explain work; and inspections led by moderators. Static testing allows early feedback but cannot find runtime issues and is time-consuming.
Static techniques involve reviewing software work products to improve quality. There are both informal and formal review processes. A formal review process consists of 6 phases: planning, kick-off, preparation, review meeting, rework, and follow-up. During the review meeting, issues are logged and discussed. The author then reworks the document based on defects found. Roles in a formal review include moderator, author, scribe, and reviewers. Different types of formal reviews are described such as walkthroughs, technical reviews, and inspections.
This chapter describes static test techniques, including reviews, and provides an overviewof how they are conducted. The fundamental objective of static testing is to improve the quality of softwarework products by assisting engineers to recognize and fix their own defects early in the softwaredevelopment process. While static testing techniques will not solve all the problems, they areenormously effective. Static techniques can improve both quality and productivity by impressive factors.Static testing is not magic and it should not be considered a replacement for dynamic testing, but allsoftware organizations should consider using reviews in all major aspects of their work includingrequirements, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. Static analysis tools implementautomated checks, e.g. on code
Static techniques involve examining software work products like requirements, design, and code manually or with tools without executing the software. Some key advantages of static techniques include finding defects early when costs are low, increasing development productivity by reducing rework, and improving quality awareness. Static techniques can be informal reviews or more formal processes like inspections. Formal reviews follow steps like planning, preparation, review meetings, rework, and follow-up. Ensuring coding standards are followed, measuring code metrics, and having success factors like training and continuous improvement can help static techniques be effective.
The document discusses static and dynamic testing methods. Static testing involves analyzing code or documentation without executing the software, while dynamic testing executes the software. Both methods find different types of defects. Key aspects of static testing include review processes, which can be informal or formal. Formal reviews involve several phases: planning, kick-off, preparation, review meeting, rework, and follow-up. The review meeting itself includes logging defects, discussing them, and deciding on next steps. Roles in the review include moderator, author, scribe, and reviewers. Different review types are described.
Topics: Reviews and the test process, Types of review, static analysis
To know more about
Offer- http://mazenet-chennai.in/mazenet-offers.html
Syllabus- http://www.mazenet-chennai.in/software-testing-training-in-chennai.html
Slide share: http://www.slideshare.net/mazenet_solution/presentations
For more events- http://mazenet-chennai.in/mazenet-events.html
All videos- https://www.youtube.com/c/Mazenetsolution
Facebook- https://www.facebook.com/Mazenet.IT.Solution/
Twitter- https://twitter.com/Maze_net
Mail us : marketing@mazenetsolution.com
Contact: 9629728714
Static testing methods examine software work products like requirements and design documents without executing the software. This allows defects to be found early. Some advantages of static testing include early feedback on quality, low rework costs from finding defects early, and increased development productivity. Formal reviews follow a defined process with roles like moderator, author, scribe, and reviewers. Reviews can find defects, improve quality, and create common understanding. Static analysis tools can check for adherence to coding standards and metrics.
The document describes the planning, preparation, and execution of a review process. It discusses the following key points:
1. A moderator plans the review by scheduling it and performing an entry check to ensure the document is ready.
2. Reviewers individually prepare by checking pages according to their assigned role and logging any issues found.
3. The review meeting involves logging all issues page by page without discussion, then discussing and deciding on each issue.
4. The author addresses issues through rework and indicates changes.
5. The moderator ensures all issues were adequately addressed and collects review metrics for process improvement.
The document discusses static techniques for testing software work products like code, requirements, and design specifications. Static techniques like reviews and static analysis aim to find defects early before testing to improve productivity and reduce costs. Reviews involve examining documentation for defects, while static analysis checks code complexity, errors, and other issues without executing the code. Formal reviews follow steps like planning, kickoff meetings, preparation, review meetings, reworking defects, and follow up. Roles include managers, moderators, authors, reviewers, and scribes.
The document discusses Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (DFMEA) which identifies ways failures can occur, estimates their effects and seriousness, and recommends corrective actions. It also discusses reliability prediction and measurement, techniques like standardization and redundancy to optimize reliability, tools for design verification, reliability testing, measurement system evaluation including accuracy, precision, calibration, and process capability evaluation.
This document discusses static testing techniques, including reviews. It describes the review process, roles in reviews, types of reviews, and static analysis using tools. Reviews are a formal process typically involving planning, preparation, a review meeting, rework, and follow-up. Roles include the moderator, author, scribe, and reviewers. Types of reviews serve different purposes at different stages. Static analysis tools can check coding standards and metrics, as well as code structure.
For Youtube Videos: bit.do/sevents
What is a testing technique?
Black and White box testing
Black box test techniques
White box test techniques
Error Guessing
This document discusses quality management procedures for construction projects. It begins by outlining six basic procedures required by the ISO 9001 standard, but notes these are not sufficient on their own for large construction projects. Additional common procedures are then listed across areas like procurement, design, subcontracting, and handover. Quality management tools like check sheets, control charts, Pareto charts, and scatter plots are also defined. The document emphasizes keeping quality systems simple in order to ensure usability and compliance.
Continous auditing vs traditional slide shareBob Sahm
Advantages of Shifting from a Traditional Problem Based
Audit Approach to a Continuous Audit Approach
Focused on Control Improvement
Provides justification to non-auditor audience why traditional internal audit project based approach needs to have a mix with continuous controls approach.
This was originally prepared for a public sector state agency.
Static analysis techniques provide a powerful way to improve software quality and productivity. Static techniques include reviews of software work products by teams to find defects early when rework costs are low. Automated static analysis tools can also examine code structure and adherence to coding standards without executing code. The goal of static analysis is to identify defects before dynamic testing to reduce rework.
The document discusses static testing techniques, which involve examining software work products like requirements and design documents manually or with tools, without executing the software. Some key benefits of static testing mentioned are that it allows early feedback on quality issues, defects can be detected and fixed early at lower cost, and development productivity may increase as rework effort is reduced. Various types of static testing techniques are described, including reviews, inspections, coding standard checks, and code metrics analysis. Formal reviews follow defined processes with roles like moderator, author, and reviewers. Success factors for effective reviews include training participants, explicit planning, and continuous process improvement.
The document describes the six phases of a formal review process:
1. Planning involves assigning a moderator and scheduling the review.
2. Kick-off is an optional meeting to align participants on the document and time commitment.
3. Preparation includes checking documents at a defined rate, usually 5-10 pages per hour.
4. The review meeting logs defects, discusses severity, and decides if exit criteria are met.
5. Rework is done by the author to address defects found before another review.
6. Follow-up ensures all defects were adequately addressed before the document is finalized.
The document provides an overview of the formal technical review (FTR) process. It discusses the objectives and benefits of FTR, which include improving quality and reducing defects and costs. The document outlines the basic principles of review, including a general inspection process with phases for planning, orientation, preparation, review meeting, rework, and verification. It also discusses critical success factors for effective reviews, such as using detailed checklists to guide inspection and allocating sufficient time for preparation.
Static techniques can improve both quality and productivity by impressive factors. Static testing is not magic and it should not be considered a replacement for dynamic testing, but all software organizations should consider using reviews in all major aspects of their work including requirements, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. Static analysis tools implement automated checks, e.g. on code
The document discusses static testing techniques, specifically reviews. It describes the review process, which typically involves 6 phases: planning, kick-off, preparation, review meeting, rework, and follow-up. Key roles in a review include the moderator, author, scribe, and reviewers. The moderator leads the process, while the author's goal is to improve the document. Reviews can find defects early and improve quality and productivity.
This document discusses software inspections as a way to improve quality. It describes the benefits of inspections in finding defects early. Inspections typically involve a moderator, author, reader, recorder and inspectors reviewing requirements, design or code documents. Key aspects of inspections include planning, overview, preparation, meeting, analysis and rework. Guiding principles are to critique products not people and find problems, not fix them, during reviews. Record keeping of found defects is important for process improvement. Providing training and building inspections into schedules can help make them most effective.
Static testing involves examining a program's code and documentation without executing the code. It aims to improve quality by finding errors early. Techniques include informal reviews with minimal documentation; formal reviews following steps like planning, preparation, and follow-up; technical reviews of specifications; walkthroughs where authors explain work; and inspections led by moderators. Static testing allows early feedback but cannot find runtime issues and is time-consuming.
Static techniques involve reviewing software work products to improve quality. There are both informal and formal review processes. A formal review process consists of 6 phases: planning, kick-off, preparation, review meeting, rework, and follow-up. During the review meeting, issues are logged and discussed. The author then reworks the document based on defects found. Roles in a formal review include moderator, author, scribe, and reviewers. Different types of formal reviews are described such as walkthroughs, technical reviews, and inspections.
This chapter describes static test techniques, including reviews, and provides an overviewof how they are conducted. The fundamental objective of static testing is to improve the quality of softwarework products by assisting engineers to recognize and fix their own defects early in the softwaredevelopment process. While static testing techniques will not solve all the problems, they areenormously effective. Static techniques can improve both quality and productivity by impressive factors.Static testing is not magic and it should not be considered a replacement for dynamic testing, but allsoftware organizations should consider using reviews in all major aspects of their work includingrequirements, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. Static analysis tools implementautomated checks, e.g. on code
Static techniques involve examining software work products like requirements, design, and code manually or with tools without executing the software. Some key advantages of static techniques include finding defects early when costs are low, increasing development productivity by reducing rework, and improving quality awareness. Static techniques can be informal reviews or more formal processes like inspections. Formal reviews follow steps like planning, preparation, review meetings, rework, and follow-up. Ensuring coding standards are followed, measuring code metrics, and having success factors like training and continuous improvement can help static techniques be effective.
The document discusses static and dynamic testing methods. Static testing involves analyzing code or documentation without executing the software, while dynamic testing executes the software. Both methods find different types of defects. Key aspects of static testing include review processes, which can be informal or formal. Formal reviews involve several phases: planning, kick-off, preparation, review meeting, rework, and follow-up. The review meeting itself includes logging defects, discussing them, and deciding on next steps. Roles in the review include moderator, author, scribe, and reviewers. Different review types are described.
Topics: Reviews and the test process, Types of review, static analysis
To know more about
Offer- http://mazenet-chennai.in/mazenet-offers.html
Syllabus- http://www.mazenet-chennai.in/software-testing-training-in-chennai.html
Slide share: http://www.slideshare.net/mazenet_solution/presentations
For more events- http://mazenet-chennai.in/mazenet-events.html
All videos- https://www.youtube.com/c/Mazenetsolution
Facebook- https://www.facebook.com/Mazenet.IT.Solution/
Twitter- https://twitter.com/Maze_net
Mail us : marketing@mazenetsolution.com
Contact: 9629728714
Static testing methods examine software work products like requirements and design documents without executing the software. This allows defects to be found early. Some advantages of static testing include early feedback on quality, low rework costs from finding defects early, and increased development productivity. Formal reviews follow a defined process with roles like moderator, author, scribe, and reviewers. Reviews can find defects, improve quality, and create common understanding. Static analysis tools can check for adherence to coding standards and metrics.
The document describes the planning, preparation, and execution of a review process. It discusses the following key points:
1. A moderator plans the review by scheduling it and performing an entry check to ensure the document is ready.
2. Reviewers individually prepare by checking pages according to their assigned role and logging any issues found.
3. The review meeting involves logging all issues page by page without discussion, then discussing and deciding on each issue.
4. The author addresses issues through rework and indicates changes.
5. The moderator ensures all issues were adequately addressed and collects review metrics for process improvement.
The document discusses static techniques for testing software work products like code, requirements, and design specifications. Static techniques like reviews and static analysis aim to find defects early before testing to improve productivity and reduce costs. Reviews involve examining documentation for defects, while static analysis checks code complexity, errors, and other issues without executing the code. Formal reviews follow steps like planning, kickoff meetings, preparation, review meetings, reworking defects, and follow up. Roles include managers, moderators, authors, reviewers, and scribes.
The document discusses Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (DFMEA) which identifies ways failures can occur, estimates their effects and seriousness, and recommends corrective actions. It also discusses reliability prediction and measurement, techniques like standardization and redundancy to optimize reliability, tools for design verification, reliability testing, measurement system evaluation including accuracy, precision, calibration, and process capability evaluation.
This document discusses static testing techniques, including reviews. It describes the review process, roles in reviews, types of reviews, and static analysis using tools. Reviews are a formal process typically involving planning, preparation, a review meeting, rework, and follow-up. Roles include the moderator, author, scribe, and reviewers. Types of reviews serve different purposes at different stages. Static analysis tools can check coding standards and metrics, as well as code structure.
For Youtube Videos: bit.do/sevents
What is a testing technique?
Black and White box testing
Black box test techniques
White box test techniques
Error Guessing
This document discusses quality management procedures for construction projects. It begins by outlining six basic procedures required by the ISO 9001 standard, but notes these are not sufficient on their own for large construction projects. Additional common procedures are then listed across areas like procurement, design, subcontracting, and handover. Quality management tools like check sheets, control charts, Pareto charts, and scatter plots are also defined. The document emphasizes keeping quality systems simple in order to ensure usability and compliance.
Continous auditing vs traditional slide shareBob Sahm
Advantages of Shifting from a Traditional Problem Based
Audit Approach to a Continuous Audit Approach
Focused on Control Improvement
Provides justification to non-auditor audience why traditional internal audit project based approach needs to have a mix with continuous controls approach.
This was originally prepared for a public sector state agency.
Static analysis techniques provide a powerful way to improve software quality and productivity. Static techniques include reviews of software work products by teams to find defects early when rework costs are low. Automated static analysis tools can also examine code structure and adherence to coding standards without executing code. The goal of static analysis is to identify defects before dynamic testing to reduce rework.
The document discusses static testing techniques, which involve examining software work products like requirements and design documents manually or with tools, without executing the software. Some key benefits of static testing mentioned are that it allows early feedback on quality issues, defects can be detected and fixed early at lower cost, and development productivity may increase as rework effort is reduced. Various types of static testing techniques are described, including reviews, inspections, coding standard checks, and code metrics analysis. Formal reviews follow defined processes with roles like moderator, author, and reviewers. Success factors for effective reviews include training participants, explicit planning, and continuous process improvement.
The document describes the six phases of a formal review process:
1. Planning involves assigning a moderator and scheduling the review.
2. Kick-off is an optional meeting to align participants on the document and time commitment.
3. Preparation includes checking documents at a defined rate, usually 5-10 pages per hour.
4. The review meeting logs defects, discusses severity, and decides if exit criteria are met.
5. Rework is done by the author to address defects found before another review.
6. Follow-up ensures all defects were adequately addressed before the document is finalized.
The document provides an overview of the formal technical review (FTR) process. It discusses the objectives and benefits of FTR, which include improving quality and reducing defects and costs. The document outlines the basic principles of review, including a general inspection process with phases for planning, orientation, preparation, review meeting, rework, and verification. It also discusses critical success factors for effective reviews, such as using detailed checklists to guide inspection and allocating sufficient time for preparation.
Static techniques allow for examining software work products like requirements, design documents, and source code manually or with tools, without executing the software. This is known as static testing. Static testing can evaluate all software work products early in the development lifecycle through review techniques. Reviews involve examining documents for defects and quality issues in a team setting. This allows information sharing and helps focus testing. Reviews have been shown to improve productivity and quality by reducing defects found later.
The document summarizes the review process for documents. It discusses the phases of a formal review process including planning, kick-off, preparation, review meeting, rework, and follow-up. It also describes the roles and responsibilities of those involved in the review including the moderator, author, scribe, and reviewers. Finally, it outlines different types of reviews including walkthroughs and technical reviews.
Static testing is a software testing method that involves examination of program's code and its associated documentation but does not require the program to be executed.
Static Testing Techniques
Informal Reviews
Formal Reviews
Technical Reviews
Walk Through
Inspection Process
Static Code Review
Things to keep in mind before starting a test planNexSoftsys
If you are going to start a test plan, then you will know that most of the time in software testing, there is more debate on its quality and plan of activities. Today many things are worth noting, but you have to pay attention to these important things before starting the test plan.
Static techniques like reviews and static analysis tools can find defects in software work products like requirements, design, and code without executing the software. Reviews vary in formality from informal discussions to more structured inspections and walkthroughs. Static analysis examines software artifacts automatically using tools to identify defects before dynamic testing begins.
This is chapter 3 of ISTQB Advance Test Manager certification. This presentation helps aspirants understand and prepare the content of the certification.
This document discusses the formal review process and types of reviews. It provides details on the typical phases of a formal review process: planning, kick-off, preparation, review meeting, rework, and follow-up. It also describes different types of reviews - walkthroughs, inspections, and their key characteristics. Finally, it lists some critical success factors for implementing formal reviews, such as finding a champion, training participants, and continuously improving the review process.
The document discusses static techniques for software testing, including static analysis and reviews. It describes static testing as examining software work products like code manually or with tools without executing it. Reviews can range from informal to formal, with formal reviews involving planning, preparation by reviewers finding defects, a review meeting, rework by the author, and follow-up. The roles of moderator, author, scribe and reviewer in formal reviews are also outlined. Types of reviews like walkthroughs, technical reviews and inspections are also described. Finally, the document discusses how static analysis tools can find defects in code, standards, metrics and structure.
This document discusses fundamentals of software testing. It explains why testing is necessary to find defects that could harm people or companies. Testing helps ensure quality by evaluating if software meets requirements. There are limitations to testing, as exhaustive testing of all combinations is not feasible. The document compares software testing to driving tests, noting both involve planning tests, evaluating results against requirements, and making risk-based pass/fail decisions. It discusses using both static and dynamic testing to achieve test objectives like finding defects and gaining confidence in quality.
SQA (Software Quality Assurance) involves planned and systematic activities to ensure quality of software products and processes. This includes establishing standards and procedures for development, continuous monitoring of products and processes, and conducting audits. Key SQA activities include product evaluation to ensure adherence to standards, process monitoring to ensure procedures are followed correctly, and product audits to thoroughly review products and processes. The SQA plan documents the quality assurance approach and controls quality throughout the project.
The document provides information about auditing a microbiological laboratory. It defines quality audits and outlines the scope and objectives of auditing. Key areas that are audited include laboratory equipment, standard operating procedures, documentation, environmental monitoring, and testing processes. The document discusses auditing the laboratory facility, equipment, documentation systems, and testing methods to ensure compliance with standards.
Organizational responsibilities and test automationvineeta vineeta
the responsibilities and roles of the members of an organization during the software testing and development phase moreover, the test automation and its techniques with the need of doing test automation is discussed in the presentation
The document discusses various topics related to software testing such as the testing life cycle, requirement traceability matrix, test planning, different types of testing, challenges in testing, test team approaches, and cost aspects. It emphasizes that testing is an important process to identify defects and improve quality but is often undervalued. A structured approach and clear policies are needed to make testing effective. Tracking metrics like defect trends and test team efficiency can help optimize the testing process.
06-04-2024 - NYC Tech Week - Discussion on Vector Databases, Unstructured Data and AI
Round table discussion of vector databases, unstructured data, ai, big data, real-time, robots and Milvus.
A lively discussion with NJ Gen AI Meetup Lead, Prasad and Procure.FYI's Co-Found
4th Modern Marketing Reckoner by MMA Global India & Group M: 60+ experts on W...Social Samosa
The Modern Marketing Reckoner (MMR) is a comprehensive resource packed with POVs from 60+ industry leaders on how AI is transforming the 4 key pillars of marketing – product, place, price and promotions.
State of Artificial intelligence Report 2023kuntobimo2016
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a multidisciplinary field of science and engineering whose goal is to create intelligent machines.
We believe that AI will be a force multiplier on technological progress in our increasingly digital, data-driven world. This is because everything around us today, ranging from culture to consumer products, is a product of intelligence.
The State of AI Report is now in its sixth year. Consider this report as a compilation of the most interesting things we’ve seen with a goal of triggering an informed conversation about the state of AI and its implication for the future.
We consider the following key dimensions in our report:
Research: Technology breakthroughs and their capabilities.
Industry: Areas of commercial application for AI and its business impact.
Politics: Regulation of AI, its economic implications and the evolving geopolitics of AI.
Safety: Identifying and mitigating catastrophic risks that highly-capable future AI systems could pose to us.
Predictions: What we believe will happen in the next 12 months and a 2022 performance review to keep us honest.
Enhanced Enterprise Intelligence with your personal AI Data Copilot.pdfGetInData
Recently we have observed the rise of open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) that are community-driven or developed by the AI market leaders, such as Meta (Llama3), Databricks (DBRX) and Snowflake (Arctic). On the other hand, there is a growth in interest in specialized, carefully fine-tuned yet relatively small models that can efficiently assist programmers in day-to-day tasks. Finally, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) architectures have gained a lot of traction as the preferred approach for LLMs context and prompt augmentation for building conversational SQL data copilots, code copilots and chatbots.
In this presentation, we will show how we built upon these three concepts a robust Data Copilot that can help to democratize access to company data assets and boost performance of everyone working with data platforms.
Why do we need yet another (open-source ) Copilot?
How can we build one?
Architecture and evaluation
Natural Language Processing (NLP), RAG and its applications .pptxfkyes25
1. In the realm of Natural Language Processing (NLP), knowledge-intensive tasks such as question answering, fact verification, and open-domain dialogue generation require the integration of vast and up-to-date information. Traditional neural models, though powerful, struggle with encoding all necessary knowledge within their parameters, leading to limitations in generalization and scalability. The paper "Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks" introduces RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation), a novel framework that synergizes retrieval mechanisms with generative models, enhancing performance by dynamically incorporating external knowledge during inference.
Learn SQL from basic queries to Advance queriesmanishkhaire30
Dive into the world of data analysis with our comprehensive guide on mastering SQL! This presentation offers a practical approach to learning SQL, focusing on real-world applications and hands-on practice. Whether you're a beginner or looking to sharpen your skills, this guide provides the tools you need to extract, analyze, and interpret data effectively.
Key Highlights:
Foundations of SQL: Understand the basics of SQL, including data retrieval, filtering, and aggregation.
Advanced Queries: Learn to craft complex queries to uncover deep insights from your data.
Data Trends and Patterns: Discover how to identify and interpret trends and patterns in your datasets.
Practical Examples: Follow step-by-step examples to apply SQL techniques in real-world scenarios.
Actionable Insights: Gain the skills to derive actionable insights that drive informed decision-making.
Join us on this journey to enhance your data analysis capabilities and unlock the full potential of SQL. Perfect for data enthusiasts, analysts, and anyone eager to harness the power of data!
#DataAnalysis #SQL #LearningSQL #DataInsights #DataScience #Analytics
06-04-2024 - NYC Tech Week - Discussion on Vector Databases, Unstructured Data and AI
Discussion on Vector Databases, Unstructured Data and AI
https://www.meetup.com/unstructured-data-meetup-new-york/
This meetup is for people working in unstructured data. Speakers will come present about related topics such as vector databases, LLMs, and managing data at scale. The intended audience of this group includes roles like machine learning engineers, data scientists, data engineers, software engineers, and PMs.This meetup was formerly Milvus Meetup, and is sponsored by Zilliz maintainers of Milvus.
Beyond the Basics of A/B Tests: Highly Innovative Experimentation Tactics You...Aggregage
This webinar will explore cutting-edge, less familiar but powerful experimentation methodologies which address well-known limitations of standard A/B Testing. Designed for data and product leaders, this session aims to inspire the embrace of innovative approaches and provide insights into the frontiers of experimentation!
1. Static techniques
by: Riat Rayendra
Information System UIN Suska Riau 2017
http://sif.uin-suska.ac.id/
http://uin-suska.ac.id/
2. INTRO
• Static test techniques provide a powerful
way to improve the quality and productivity
of software development.
• Static techniques can improve both quality
and productivity by impressive factors.
• Static testing is not magic and it should
not be considered a replacement for
dynamic testing, but all software
organizations should consider using
reviews in all major aspects of their work
including requirements, design,
implementation, testing, and maintenance.
Static analysis tools implement automated
checks, e.g. on code.
4. Studies have shown that as a result of reviews, a significant increase in
productivity and product quality can be achieved [Gilb and Graham, 1993], [van
Veenendaal, 1999]. Reducing the number of defects early in the product life
cycle also means that less time has to be spent on testing and maintenance. To
summarize, the use of static testing, e.g. reviews, on software work products
has various advantages:
– Since static testing can start early in the life cycle, early feedback on
quality issues can be established, e.g. an early validation of user
requirements and not just late in the life cycle during acceptance
testing.
– By detecting defects at an early stage, rework costs are most often
relatively low and thus a relatively cheap improvement of the quality of
software products can be achieved.
– Since rework effort is substantially reduced, development productivity
figures are likely to increase.
– The evaluation by a team has the additional advantage that there is an
exchange of information between the participants.
– Static tests contribute to an increased awareness of quality issues.
REVIEWS AND THE TEST PROCESS
5. • Reviews vary from very informal to formal (i.e. well structured
and regulated). Although inspection is perhaps the most
documented and formal review technique, it is certainly not the
only one.
• The formality of a review process is related to factors such as the
maturity of the development process, any legal or regulatory
requirements or the need for an audit trail. In practice the
informal review is perhaps the most common type of review.
REVIEW PROCESS
6. Phases of a formal review
In contrast to informal reviews, formal reviews
follow a formal process. A typical formal review
process consists of six main steps:
• 1 Planning
• 2 Kick-off
• 3 Preparation
• 4 Review meeting
• 5 Rework
• 6 Follow-up.
7. Planning
Although more and other entry criteria can be applied, the following can
be regarded as the minimum set for performing the entry check:
• A short check of a product sample by the moderator (or expert) does
not reveal a large number of major defects. For example, after 30
minutes of checking, no more than 3 major defects are found on a
single page or fewer than 10 major defects in total in a set of 5 pages.
• The document to be reviewed is available with line numbers.
• The document has been cleaned up by running any automated checks
that apply.
• References needed for the inspection are stable and available.
• The document author is prepared to join the review team and feels
confident with the quality of the document.
8. Planning
Although more and other entry criteria can be applied, the following can
be regarded as the minimum set for performing the entry check:
• A short check of a product sample by the moderator (or expert) does
not reveal a large number of major defects. For example, after 30
minutes of checking, no more than 3 major defects are found on a
single page or fewer than 10 major defects in total in a set of 5 pages.
• The document to be reviewed is available with line numbers.
• The document has been cleaned up by running any automated checks
that apply.
• References needed for the inspection are stable and available.
• The document author is prepared to join the review team and feels
confident with the quality of the document.
9. Kick off
• An optional step in a review procedure is a kick-off meeting.
The goal of this meeting is to get everybody on the same
wavelength regarding the document under review and to
commit to the time that will be spent on checking.
• Also the result of the entry check and defined exit criteria are
discussed in case of a more formal review. In general a kick-off
is highly recommended since there is a strong positive effect of
a kick-off meeting on the motivation of reviewers and thus the
effectiveness of the review process.
• At customer sites, we have measured results up to 70% more
major defects found per page as a result of performing a kick-
off, [van Veenendaal and van der Zwan, 2000]
10. Preparation
• A critical success factor for a thorough preparation is the
number of pages checked per hour. This is called the checking
rate. The optimum checking rate is the result of a mix of
factors, including the type of document, its complexity, the
number of related documents and the experience of the
reviewer.
• Usually the checking rate is in the range of five to ten pages
per hour, but may be much less for formal inspection, e.g. one
page per hour. During preparation, participants should not
exceed this criterion. By collecting data and measuring the
review process, company-specific criteria for checking rate and
document size (see planning phase) can be set, preferably
specific to a document type.
11. Review meeting
Every defect and its severity should be logged. The participant who identifies the defect
proposes the severity. Severity classes could be:
• Critical: defects will cause downstream damage; the scope and impact of the defect
is beyond the document under inspection.
• Major, defects could cause a downstream effect (e.g. a fault in a design can result
in an error in the implementation).
• Minor, defects are not likely to cause downstream damage (e.g. non-compli ance
with the standards and templates). ,
At the end of the meeting, a decision on the document under review has to be made by
the participants, sometimes based on formal exit criteria. The most important exit
criterion is the average number of critical and/or major defects found per page (e.g. no
more than three critical/major defects per page). If the number of defects found per page
exceeds a certain level, the document must be reviewed again, after it has been reworked.
If the document complies with the exit criteria, the document will be checked during
follow-up by the moderator or one or more participants. Subsequently, the document can
leave the review process. If a project is under pressure, the moderator will sometimes be
forced to skip re-reviews and exit with a defect-prone document. Setting, and agreeing,
quantified exit level criteria helps the moderator to make firm decisions at all times.
12. Rework
• Based on the defects detected, the author will improve the document
under review step by step. Not every defect that is found leads to
rework.
• It is the author's responsibility to judge if a defect has to be fixed. If
nothing is done about an issue for a certain reason, it should be
reported to at least indicate that the author has considered the issue.
Changes that are made to the document should be easy to identify
during follow-up. Therefore the author has to indicate where changes
are made (e.g. using 'Track changes' in word-processing software).
13. Follow-up
• The moderator is responsible for ensuring that satisfactory actions
have been taken on all (logged) defects, process improvement
suggestions and change requests.
• Although the moderator checks to make sure that the author has
taken action on all known defects, it is not necessary for the
moderator to check all the corrections in detail. If it is decided that
all participants will check the updated document, the moderator
takes care of the distribution and collects the feedback. For more
formal review types the moderator checks for compliance to the exit
criteria.
14. Follow-up
• The moderator is responsible for ensuring that satisfactory actions
have been taken on all (logged) defects, process improvement
suggestions and change requests.
• Although the moderator checks to make sure that the author has
taken action on all known defects, it is not necessary for the
moderator to check all the corrections in detail. If it is decided that
all participants will check the updated document, the moderator
takes care of the distribution and collects the feedback. For more
formal review types the moderator checks for compliance to the exit
criteria.
15. Reference
• Graham, d., et al. 2006.
Foundation of Software Testing:
ISTQB certification London,
UK: International Thomson
Business Press
http://sif.uin-suska.ac.id/http://uin-suska.ac.id/