State of Storage Study 2015
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•2,552 views
In March 2015, Tintri storage surveyed 1,000 data center professionals about the storage topics and trends shaping their world. We explored their top pain points and plans to adopt new technologies. Dig into this deck for all the results.
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (13)
Similar to State of Storage Study 2015
Similar to State of Storage Study 2015 (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
State of Storage Study 2015
- 1. June 2, 2015 State of Storage Study 2015 Scott Buchanan sbuchanan@tintri.com
- 2. 1 Respondent Profile 2 Storage Pain 3 Virtualization Vision 4 What’s Next?
- 4. Mix of PRIMARY job responsibilities 57% of respondents have >5 years of experience in current function Respondents by Role 4PROPRIETARY INFORMATION © 2015 Tintri Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- 5. Respondents by Storage Type Used 5PROPRIETARY INFORMATION © 2015 Tintri Inc. All Rights Reserved. Grouped respondents into one of three categories based on current storage provider(s) [Dell, EMC, Fujitsu, Hitachi, HP, IBM, NetApp] [Nimble Storage, Nutanix, Pure Storage, SolidFire, Tegile, Tintri]
- 6. Storage Pain
- 7. Biggest Storage Pain Points 7PROPRIETARY INFORMATION © 2015 Tintri Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- 8. Source of Pain? Data Center Disconnect 8PROPRIETARY INFORMATION © 2015 Tintri Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 75% 2014 2015 2016 2017 82% 2018 Percentage of workloads that have been virtualized
- 9. Biggest Storage Pain Points by Role 9PROPRIETARY INFORMATION © 2015 Tintri Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- 10. Biggest Storage Pain Points by Type Used 10PROPRIETARY INFORMATION © 2015 Tintri Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- 11. Storage Tactics : Strategic Projects Ratio of Tactics to Strategic Projects 11PROPRIETARY INFORMATION © 2015 Tintri Inc. All Rights Reserved. Tintri 0.9 : 1 All Other Providers >2.0 : 1
- 13. 38% of respondents are using multiple hypervisors Current Hypervisor 13PROPRIETARY INFORMATION © 2015 Tintri Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- 14. Spending Shift Favors Storage + Private Cloud 14PROPRIETARY INFORMATION © 2015 Tintri Inc. All Rights Reserved. Server / compute Network Storage Private Cloud Public Cloud “The key to containing costs is finding storage that is built for virtualization and cloud”
- 15. What’s Next
- 16. Storage Provider Shift Favors ‘Emerging’ 16PROPRIETARY INFORMATION © 2015 Tintri Inc. All Rights Reserved. LEGACY -3.7% EMERGING +11.8%
- 17. Storage Buying Criteria 17PROPRIETARY INFORMATION © 2015 Tintri Inc. All Rights Reserved. Criteria used to select current provider: 1 2 3 4 PERFORMANCE EASE OF USE COST PER GIGABYTE VENDOR RELATIONSHIP Criteria used to select next provider: 1 2 3 4 PERFORMANCE EASE OF USE COST PER GIGABYTE VENDOR RELATIONSHIP “If you always think what you always thought, you’ll always get what you always got.”
- 18. Storage Innovation (Open-ended) 18PROPRIETARY INFORMATION © 2015 Tintri Inc. All Rights Reserved. Most recent innovation: Desired next innovation:
- 19. Q & A
- 20. Thank You 20PROPRIETARY INFORMATION © 2015 Tintri Inc. All Rights Reserved. info@tintri.com @Tintri @Tintri_EMEA
Editor's Notes
- Global manufacturing company HQ in Japan 3000 employees worldwide Virtualized mission critical servers including SAP, SQL Server Reduced Opex and management burden, reduced LUNs and the OpEx to manage them 40:1
- Global manufacturing company HQ in Japan 3000 employees worldwide Virtualized mission critical servers including SAP, SQL Server Reduced Opex and management burden, reduced LUNs and the OpEx to manage them 40:1
- Global manufacturing company HQ in Japan 3000 employees worldwide Virtualized mission critical servers including SAP, SQL Server Reduced Opex and management burden, reduced LUNs and the OpEx to manage them 40:1
- Global manufacturing company HQ in Japan 3000 employees worldwide Virtualized mission critical servers including SAP, SQL Server Reduced Opex and management burden, reduced LUNs and the OpEx to manage them 40:1
- Global manufacturing company HQ in Japan 3000 employees worldwide Virtualized mission critical servers including SAP, SQL Server Reduced Opex and management burden, reduced LUNs and the OpEx to manage them 40:1
- Global manufacturing company HQ in Japan 3000 employees worldwide Virtualized mission critical servers including SAP, SQL Server Reduced Opex and management burden, reduced LUNs and the OpEx to manage them 40:1
- Global manufacturing company HQ in Japan 3000 employees worldwide Virtualized mission critical servers including SAP, SQL Server Reduced Opex and management burden, reduced LUNs and the OpEx to manage them 40:1
- Global manufacturing company HQ in Japan 3000 employees worldwide Virtualized mission critical servers including SAP, SQL Server Reduced Opex and management burden, reduced LUNs and the OpEx to manage them 40:1
- Global manufacturing company HQ in Japan 3000 employees worldwide Virtualized mission critical servers including SAP, SQL Server Reduced Opex and management burden, reduced LUNs and the OpEx to manage them 40:1
- Global manufacturing company HQ in Japan 3000 employees worldwide Virtualized mission critical servers including SAP, SQL Server Reduced Opex and management burden, reduced LUNs and the OpEx to manage them 40:1
- Global manufacturing company HQ in Japan 3000 employees worldwide Virtualized mission critical servers including SAP, SQL Server Reduced Opex and management burden, reduced LUNs and the OpEx to manage them 40:1
- Global manufacturing company HQ in Japan 3000 employees worldwide Virtualized mission critical servers including SAP, SQL Server Reduced Opex and management burden, reduced LUNs and the OpEx to manage them 40:1
- Global manufacturing company HQ in Japan 3000 employees worldwide Virtualized mission critical servers including SAP, SQL Server Reduced Opex and management burden, reduced LUNs and the OpEx to manage them 40:1