As the intensity of assistance for students increases from Tier 1 to Tier 2 to Tier 3, progress monitoring of those students becomes more frequent. Tier 1 involves practices and resources that are universally available to all students, Tier 2 involves short-term solutions for students not successful in Tier 1, and Tier 3 consists of more intense interventions for students not helped by Tier 2. The document asks questions about the resources, interventions, specialists, and fidelity of implementation at each tier.

1. Progress Monitoring becomes more frequent as
intensity of assistance increases
.
Universal Screening
E.H.P.S. SRBI Resource Mapping
Gaps
Tier 3 Lead Question
What are the more
intense/frequent interventions
when Tier 2 is ineffective?
Probing Concepts:
Supplemental resources?
Interventionists or specialists?
Operational?
Fidelity of interventions?
Tier 2 Lead Question
What short term solutions are taken to
address students who are not successful
through Tier 1?
Probing Concepts:
Supplemental resources?
In class environment?
Interventionists or specialists?
Operational?
Fidelity of interventions?
Tier 1 Lead Question
What practices or resources are available in school to which all students
have access?
Probing Concepts:
Access to Technology?
Articulated Curriculum?
Lesson Planning?
Culturally relevant practices?
Universal assessment?
Record of student performance trends?
Disaggregated Data (subgroups)?
Record Keeping?
Fidelity of implementation?